dynamic dependence in corporate credit peter christoffersen, university of toronto kris jacobs,...
TRANSCRIPT
Dynamic Dependence in Corporate Credit
Peter Christoffersen, University of TorontoKris Jacobs, University of Houston
Xisong Jin, University of LuxembourgHugues Langlois, McGill University
Conference on Copulas and Dependence: Theory and Applications
Columbia UniversityOctober 11-12, 2013
2
Research Questions
• Industry reports suggest that diversification benefits in corporate credit markets have gone down.– How do we model dynamic dependence in credit
markets?– How do we measure diversification benefits?
• Do credit spreads, volatility, and correlation have similar or separate dynamics?
• Which economic variables drive credit and equity correlations?
3
Credit Default Swaps• Corporate credit can be measured using corporate bonds or
credit default swaps.• Credit default swaps (CDS) can best be thought of as a simple
insurance product, providing insurance against corporate default (or credit events more in general).Periodic payments are exchanged against a lump sum payment contingent on default.
• CDS offer many advantages over bonds for measuring corporate credit conditions and credit spreads.– Liquidity– Cleaner measure
4
Credit Default Swaps: Applications• Hedging
– CDS allow capital or credit exposure constrained businesses (banks for example) to free up capacity.
– CDS can be a short credit positioning vehicle. It is easier to buy credit protection than short bonds.
– CDS may allow users to avoid triggering tax/accounting implications that arise from sale of assets.
– Counterparty risk.
• Investing– Investors take a view on deterioration or improvement of credit quality of a
reference credit– CDS offer the opportunity to take a view purely on credit– CDS offer access to hard to find credit (limited supply of bonds)– Investors can tailor their credit exposure to maturity requirements, as well as
desired seniority in the capital structure
5
Overview
1. Data2. Conditional Mean and Volatility Models3. Copula Models4. Credit Diversification Benefits5. Economic Drivers of Dependence6. (Tail) Dependence and Credit Spreads
6
1. Data• 5-year-CDS quotes each Wednesday.• From Markit: 215 individual firms included in
the first 18 series of the CDX North American investment grade index.
• Data range: from 01/01/2001 to 22/08/2012.• Equity data from CRSP
7
Some Market Events in our Sample
• 19/07/2002 WorldCom Bankruptcy• 05/05/2005 Ford and GM Downgrade to Junk• 08/10/2005 Delphi Bankruptcy• 06/08/2007 Quant Meltdown• 16/03/2008 Bear Stearns Bankruptcy• 15/09/2008 Lehman Bankruptcy• 10/03/2009 Stock Market Trough• 05/08/2011 US Sovereign Debt Downgrade
8
Median CDS Spreads, IQR and 90% Range
9
CDS Spreads for
9 Industries: Indus
try Medi
an and
Industry
90% Rang
e
10
Threshold Correlations• Use the weekly log differences in CDS premia and
equity prices.• Standardize the weekly “returns” using sample
mean and volatility.• Compute threshold correlations:
• Where x is measured in standard deviations from the mean.
11
Biva
riate
Thr
esho
ld C
orre
latio
ns.
Med
ian
and
IQR
acro
ss F
irm P
airs
12
2. Dynamic Conditional Mean and Volatility Models
• Univariate models on weekly log diffs for CDS spreads and equity on 215 firms.
• Up to ARMA(2,2) for the conditional mean. Model selection by AICC.
• Engle and Ng (1993) NGARCH(1,1) for the conditional variance.
• Hansen (1994) asymmetric standardized t distribution for ARMA-NGARCH shocks.
13
Dynamic Conditional Mean and Volatility Models
14
Parameter Estimation (Univariate)
15
Thre
shol
d Co
rrel
ation
s on
Sho
cks.
M
edia
n an
d IQ
R
16
CDS Spreads and CDS Spread Volatility
17
CDS
Spre
ad V
ols
for 9
Indu
strie
s:
Indu
stry
Med
ian
and
Indu
stry
90%
Ran
ge
18
CDS Spreads and Equity Volatility: Structural Credit Risk Models
19
3. The Dynamic Asymmetric Copula (DAC)• Key Challenge: 215 firms and 25,000+ correlations that change
week by week.• Crucial ingredients:
– Parsimonious Dynamic Conditional Correlation model of Engle (2002).
– Flexible Multivariate Skewed t Distribution in DeMarta and McNeil (2004).
– Large-scale composite likelihood estimation as in Engle, Shephard and Sheppard (2008).
– Allow for different start and end times for each firm. Patton (2006).– Unconditional moment matching.– Time-varying degrees of freedom.
• DAC model based on Christoffersen and Langlois (JFQA, 2013) and Christoffersen, Errunza, Jacobs and Langlois (RFS, 2012).
20
Dynamic Asymmetric Copula
Use skewed t copula: three parameters
21
Dynamic Asymmetric Copula• Copula correlation dynamic
• Time-varying degrees of freedom
• Composite likelihood function
22
- Median, IQR, and 90% range of bivariate copula correlations. - CDS spread and equity log diffs.- Note shocks to credit and equity correlations occur at different times.- Note different time paths- Note differentpersistence
23
-Median, IQR, and 90% range of bivariate tail dependence. - Note differences with copula correlations- Note shift incredit and equity tail dependence occurs at different times.- Note different time path
24
CDS
Spre
ad a
nd E
quity
Cor
rela
tions
for 9
Indu
strie
s:
With
in In
dust
ry M
edia
n. C
redi
t in
blac
k.
25CDS
Spre
ad a
nd E
quity
Tai
l Dep
ende
nce
for 9
Indu
strie
s:
With
in In
dust
ry M
edia
n. C
redi
t in
blac
k.
26
Parameter Estimation (Multivariate)
27
4. Conditional Diversification Benefits (CDB)
• Using Expected Shortfall (ES), We define CDB as
• Upper bound on CDB is ES average across firms (no diversification benefits). Lower bound is portfolio VaR (no tail).
• Gaussian version (when p=50%):
28
- 5% CDB for EW credit portfolio (top) and EW equity portfolio. (bottom). - Selling CDS and buying equity.- VIX on right-hand scale. Key dates in vertical bars.- Note: Deterioration in CDB in both markets. Began in credit in 2007.- Decrease in CDB bigger for credit
29
5. Economic Drivers of Credit and Equity Correlations
Macro and market variables considered– The CDX North American investment grade index level is
used to proxy for the overall level of risk in credit markets.
– The VIX index represents equity market risk.– The term structure is captured by a level variable, the 3-
month US Constant Maturity Treasury (CMT), and a slope variable, the 10 year CMT index minus the 3-month CMT.
– The crude oil price as measured by the West Texas Intermediate Cushing Crude Oil Spot Price
– The inflation level as measured by breakeven inflation.– Economic Activity measured by the ADS business index.
30
Levels Regressions for Credit Copula Correlations (as well as Tail Dependence and Volatility)
31
Difference Regressions for Credit Copula Correlations (as well as Tail Dependence and Volatility)
32
6. (Tail) Dependence and Credit Spreads
– Is higher (tail) dependence associated with higher spreads?
– Does dependence matter for spreads after taking the determinants from structural models into account (equity volatility, interest rates, leverage)?
– Conduct analysis at the firm level.– Need to investigate time-series and cross-section
separately.
33
Tail Dependence and Credit Spreads
34
Summary• We estimate a dynamic asymmetric copula model on 215 firms which
each have different start and end dates.• Credit spread levels, volatility, dependence, and tail dependence are
found to have separate dynamics.• Credit dependence appears to be permanently higher after 2007. Equity
dependence not so.• Credit and equity tail dependence both increase throughout the sample • Diversification benefits have declined in both EW credit and EW equity
portfolios, more so for credit. • We find some scope for economic drivers of credit and equity
dependence.• We document the relation between (tail) dependence and credit
spreads at the firm level.• Implications for portfolio credit risk, structured credit products,
counterparty risk management.• Nice related (independent) work by Oh and Patton (2013).
35
Appendix: Credit Events in the Sample
• CIT Group• Delphi• FHLMC• FNMA• Washington Mutual• Tribune• Lear• Eastman Kodak• Residential Cap See: http://creditfixings.com/CreditEventAuctions/fixings.jsp