dupont site and rfi review - amazon s3...storm water and wastewater analysis using clean metals...
TRANSCRIPT
DuPont Site and RFI Review
South River Science Team MeetingOctober 8, 2002
Discussion Items
Areas of known soil contamination
Storm water management
RFI Results
Outfall Locations and Areas of Elevated Hg in Soil
Storm Event Monitoring
June 01 storm event sampled at four outfalls
Grab samples collected after 30 minutes
Composite flow-based samples collected in 20 minute intervals over storm duration
Outfall 001 is combined ww and storm water
Clean metals protocol was not used
Analysis per EPA 245.1
Storm Event Monitoring ResultsTotal Mercury (mg/l)
CompositeGrab
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
2001
<0.00020Outfall 008
<0.00020Outfall 003
<0.00020Outfall 911 (011)
0.00033Outfall 901 (001)
2001
Upcoming Activities
Re-affirmation of site waste management protocols
Storm water and wastewater analysis using clean metals protocol and low-level detection
DuPont Site RFI Results
RFI Objectives
Further characterize the site geology, hydrogeology, and groundwater migration pathways
Characterize site-wide soil and groundwater quality
Evaluate current releases and potential for future releases to the South River
Regional Geologic Map
DuPont
South River
Cwb
Cel
Ceu
Ch
Ca
Site Geology
Overburden Sediments - Shallow Aquifer Alluvial sand, gravel, silt, and clay overlying bedrock Up to 18 feet thick across most of the site > 60 ft thick in karst area (NE) Absent in SW Overlies weathered Waynesboro Formation
Bedrock Waynesboro Formation - highly weathered mudstone, siltstone,
argillite and phylite (very stiff, silty clay, with shale, mudstone, siltstone) over limestone and sandstone
Shady Formation - dolomite, in NE portion of the site, subsurface only - inferred from karst features
Site Geology - Cross Section Lines
BB
'
A'
Site Geology - Cross-Section A-A’
Site Geology - Cross-Section B-B’
Karst Area
From Gathright 1977 - Geology of Waynesboro East and Waynesboro West Quadrangles Karst area believed to be associated with the Shady Formation in
sub-surfaceNot exposed in the areaKnown to be susceptible to karst weatheringPresent to the north and south of Waynesboro
Borings drilled at western toe of Blue Ridge just northeast of Waynesboro - looking for Shady FormationNo carbonate identified up to 365 ft BGSTheorized area is mature karst - most of the Carbonate
removed/collapsed or is very deep Alternate theories on the area
Brecciated zone associated with Blue Ridge thrust faulting
Site Hydrogeology
Shallow aquifer Discharges to the South River to the NW and N May discharge to karst area in NE
Deep bedrock aquifer Groundwater source for plant Discharge location unknown Not a focus of the RFI
Karst area Deep water table - shallow water table may also be present May be in communication with bedrock aquifer Unlikely to discharge to South River
GW elevation at MW-10A = 1235 ft aMSL South River elevation ~ 1270 ft a MSL (at plant)
Captured by plant production wells?
Shallow Zone Groundwater Elevations - Aug-00
WASTE STORAGE
TANKSTORAGETANK
WASTE
FOU
RTH
STR
EE
T
PERIMETER ROAD
FIR
ST
STR
EE
T
THIR
D S
TRE
ET
SEC
ON
D S
TRE
ET
ENGINE ROOM
BUILDING
TANK FARM SALT PREPBUILDING
BENGER
THIR
D S
TRE
ET
10M GAL.TANK
POWER HOUSE
NYLON
NYLONFACTORY
SIGN
LYCRA
SUB-STATION
DELPHINE AVENUE
BRIDGE
JEFFERSON AVENUE
WOODROW AVENUE
U R
BAKERSPRING
WASHINGTON AVENUE
CHEMICAL BLDG
RESERVOIR
RECREATIONPARK
BALLFIELD
1.5MGSTG
TANK
D2+35.500
SIGN
PUMPHOUSEFA 547
WELL #5
FA701
WELL #4
R
FIELDMAINTSHOPSFA 630
WELDINGSHOP
WAYN-TEX INC.
ELECTRICSHOP
MACHINESHOP
CONSOLIDATEDPUMP
DMWATER
MIDDLE AVE.
TEST
WELL
CONC.
BO X
CONC.BOX
SUMP
TRENCH
X
X
X
WELL #2
WELL #6
GRAVEL PARKINGAREA
GRAVEL STORAGEAREA
NAX
EIG
HTH
STR
EET
COALSTORAGE
PERMASEPPERMASEP
%%u LEGEND
PRODUCTION WELLS
U
Q
I
BL
Y
G
E
K
MW-20
MW-19
MW-19D
TW-2
H'
SHALLOW OVERBURDEN
WELL #1
MW-20D
MW-18
MW-16
MW-15
R
T
HF
MW-17D
D'B-1
A
SB-2
MW-3MW-2
MW-1
MW-4
MW-10
MW-9
MW-8
MW-6
MW-5
SAMPLED DURING RA/RFI
WATER LEVELBE USED TO MEASUREMONITORING WELLS TO
MONITORING WELLS TO BE
WELLS TO BE SAMPLED DURINGRA/RFI.
DEEP OVERBURDEN MONITORING
MONITORING WELL AND SOILBORING LOCATION MAP
DuPont Waynesboro SiteWaynesboro, Virginia
As shown 1/23/01 4245D001 S1
MPS
DEL
FIGUREDRAWING NO.DATE SCALE
INITIALSDESIGNED
DRAWN
CHECKED
APPROVED(DESIGN)
APPROVED(CONSTRUCTION)
An Alliance between
Barley Mill Plaza, Building 27Wilmington, Delaware 19880-0027
Corporate Remediation Group
DuPont and The W-C Diamond Group
BG-1
BG-2
BG-4
BG-3
BG-5BG-6
BG-8 BG-7
SB5-1
SB5-2
SB5-3
SB20-1
SB20-2SB18-1
SB18-2
SB17-1
SB16-1
SB14-1
SB15-1
SB3-1
SB3-2 SB3-3
SB2-2SB2-1
SB2-3
S C A L E
200 200' 400'
0C
MW-7
MW-12D
MW-12
MW-11A
S
MW-13
MW-10A
MW-7A
Summary of RFI Sampling Activities Completed Soil Sampling
10 SWMUsSWMU 1 - Hg RecoverySWMU 4 - Incineration Area
Background sampling 86 soil samples + QA/QC VOCs, SVOCs, metals, SPLP Hg, meHg, dioxins/furans, HMD, DMF, DMAC
Groundwater Sampling 40 samples (20 Wells, 2 Rounds) + QA/QC VOCs, SVOCs, metals, meHg, HMD, DMF, DMAC
Other Activities Groundwater level measurements Aquifer slug testing
Monitoring Well and Soil Boring Locations
BB
'
A'
Hg / meHg Results - Soil Hg
Low ppm levels throughout plant areaUp to 100 ppm in Hg Recovery Area (generally low ppm levels)Up to 300 ppm in Incineration AreaElemental Hg observed in buried burning pit accumulation layer (12 ft BGS) in
Incineration Area Good erosion control over the site - gravel or asphalt ground cover Buried burning pit is within silt and clay - isolated from alluvial aquifer
meHg Sampled soils for meHg at Hg Recovery and Incineration Areas only Detected ppt levels across the site Low ppb levels in 2 source areas 5.7 ppm at Incineration Area (associated with elemental Hg)
Hg / meHg Results - Groundwater Hg (dissolved)
Plant area - MW-A (0.5 ppb) Incineration Area - MW-11A (0.2 ppb), MW-12 (0.17 ppb) Down-gradient boundary - All dissolved results ND (MDL=0.050 ug/L) except
MW-20D (0.12 ppb, Oct. 2000)
meHg Sub-ppt levels at all but 2 locations (0.03 to 0.45 ng/l along South River) Ppt levels at 3 wells in sources areas (21.0 to 4.66 ng/l)
MeHg Results - Groundwater
AMB
18B
wayneri.apr
TITLE:
DATE:
CHKD.:
DW N.:
REV.:
APPD .:
DES.:
FIGURE NO.:
FILE NU MBER:
AMB
MS MS
7/5/01 0Barley Mill Plaza, Building 27Wilmington, Delaware 19805
DuPont and URS Diamond An Alliance between
Corporate Remediation Group
N
ð
ððð
ððð
ð
ð
ð
ð
ð
ðð
ð
ðð
ð
ð
ð
MW-13 Aug '00 .057 NG/L Oct '00 .078 NG/L
MW-12D Aug '00 0.14 NG/L Oct '00 0.06 NG/L
R Aug '00 0.17 NG/L Oct '00 0.01 NG/L
MW-5 Aug '00 0.023 NG/L Oct '00 0.076 NG/L
MW-4 Aug '00 ND Oct '00 ND
MW-2 Aug '00 ND Oct '00 ND
MW-20 Aug '00 0.17 NG/L Oct '00 0.26 NG/L
MW-20D Aug '00 ND Oct '00 0.23 NG/L
MW-19D Aug '00 0.17 NG/L Oct '00 0.42 NG/L
MW-15 Aug '00 .089 NG/L Oct '00 .45 NG/L
MW-17D Aug '00 0.071 NG/L Oct '00 0.067 NG/L
F Aug '00 ND Oct '00 0.083 NG/L
H' Aug '00 0.03 NG/L Oct '00 ND
MW-18 Aug '00 0.07 NG/L Oct '00 0.14 NG/L
MW-19 Aug '00 0.03 NG/L OCt '00 0.06 NG/L
H Aug '00 0.132 NG/L Oct '00 ND
MW-16 Aug '00 0.33 NG/L Oct '00 0.32 NG/L
A Aug '00 7.9 NG/L Oct '00 21.0 NG/L
MW-12 Aug '00 18.0 NG/L Oct '00 7.6 NG/L
MW-11A Aug '00 10.5 NG/L Oct '00 4.66 NG/L
RFI Groundwater Sampling Results- Methyl Mercury (NG/L)DuPont Waynesboro Plant
Legend:
ð RFI GW Sample Locations
Well ID Date Sampled Result (NG/L)
MW-13 Aug '00 .057 Oct '00 .078
0 400 800 Feet
MeHg Mass Flux to South River - Worst Case Volumetric groundwater flux (Q) to South River:
= 5.13 x 105 l/d (94 gpm) Based on length of river boundary along plant and mean aquifer
conductivity (K), gradient (i), and saturated thickness (t)
Mass Flux of meHg to South River: = 232 ug/d Based on highest concentration detected in shallow wells along the river
(0.45 ng/l; MW-15)
Predicted increase in concentration (above background) down-stream of plant after mixing: = 5.5 X 10-3 ng/l Assumes WORST CASE - lowest daily mean flow in South River
between 1953 and 1995 (17 ft3/s; Aug 8, 1966) and highest concentrationdetected along the river
Hg Mass Flux to South River - Worst Case Volumetric groundwater flux (Q) to South River:
= 5.13 x 105 l/d (94 gpm) Based on length of river boundary along plant and mean aquifer
conductivity (K), gradient (i), and saturated thickness (t)
Mass Flux of Hg to South River: = 61.6 mg/d Based on highest concentration detected in shallow wells along the river
(0.12 ng/l; MW-20D)
Predicted increase in concentration (above background) down-stream of plant after mixing: = 1.5 X 10-3 ug/l Assumes WORST CASE - lowest daily mean flow in South River
between 1953 and 1995 (17 ft3/s; Aug 8, 1966) and highest concentrationdetected along the river
Phase II RFI Objectives
Confirm nature and extent of soil and groundwater impacts mainly source areas
Further characterize groundwater flow and quality in the northeast corner of the site
Storm event surface-water discharge sampling
Initiate annual groundwater monitoring program
Conclusions Shallow overburden aquifer
Discharges to South River along plant boundary Flows off-site to the Northeast
Karst area Deep groundwater table not likely to be in communication with South
River - perched water table may also be present Depressed groundwater level suggests capture by plant production wells Needs further evaluation - flow and GW quality
MeHg Contribution to South River via shallow groundwater appears to be
negligible Sub-ppt levels detected in GW along South River Ppt concentrations localized to source areas in plant interior