dual-credit policy: impact on pev sales ... - energy institute · approach: new energy and oil...
TRANSCRIPT
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC for the US Department of Energy
Dual-credit policy: Impact on PEV sales and industry profits in China
Zhenhong LinShiqi(Shawn) Ou
TE3 - University of Michigan Energy InstituteOctober 18, 2019
2
PEV sales in China exploding until recent months
199,620
1,069,563
362,868
361,315
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18YEAR
Electr i f ied L ight-duty Vehic le Sales
HEV in China
PEV in China
HEV in US
PEV in US
1999 2005 2009 2010 0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Monthly PEV (Passenger vehicle) Sales in China
2017 2018 2019Data source: https://www.d1ev.com/news/shuju(Ou et al., 2019)
Current 2019 context: Phasing-out PEV subsidies. Falling auto sales.
3
Corporate Average Fuel Consumption (CAFC Credit)
New Energy Vehicle Quota (NEV Credit)
Meet CAFC Target?
Positive CAFC credits
Carry forward to next years
Negative CAFC credits
Offset by own PEV Credits in current year
Offset by CAFC credits transferred from related companies
Offset by purchasing PEV Credits
Yes
No
Meet NEV Production
Target?
Positive NEV credits
Sell PEV Credits
Offset negative CAFC credits
Negative NEV credits
Offset by purchasing PEV Credits
Yes
No
1 CAFC Credit = 1 NEV Credit
September 2017: “Passenger Cars Corporate Average Fuel Consumption and New Energy Vehicle Credit Regulation” (Dual-credit Policy)
Dual-credit combines CAFE and ZEV rules and is replacing purchase subsidies as policy stimulator for PEV sales
Note: NEV = new energy vehicles, including plug-in electric vehicles and fuel cell vehicles
4
Vehicle technologies
Prices
Sales
Policy complianc
e?
Profit
Max (Profit) ?
Done
Resources reallocation
No
Yes
Resource reallocation
No
Yes
Objective function: profit maximization𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑(𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣) = 0,
Or, marginal revenue = marginal cost
Discrete choice model
Approach: New Energy and Oil Consumption Credits Model (NEOCC)• Features
• A consumer choice model with industry profit optimization constrained by the Dual-credit policy• Calibrated with 2017 Chinese vehicle market (and later to 2018 market data)• Market share projection from 2018 to 2050• Policy compliance as constraints, powertrain cross-subsidy as decision variables, gross profit
maximization as the objective function• Key dynamics: battery cost, ICEV efficiency cost curve, subsidy phase-out, PEV multiplier, PEV credit
by range, charging infrastructure• Algorithm
5
Source: Ou, Lin*, Qi, Li, He, Przesmitzki. 2018. Energy Policy 121, 597-610.
530,244
705,942
1,603,416
2,132,996
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
2017 2018 2019 2020
PEV
Sa
les
Year
SUV-BEVSUV-PHEVSed-BEV400kmSed-BEV350kmSed-BEV250kmSed-BEV200kmSed-BEV150kmSed-BEV100kmSed-PHEV80kmSed-PHEV50km
Actual sales830,000
Calibration year
Annual sales by vehicle types Cumulative sales by vehicle types in 2017-2020
NEOCC results: strong PEV sales growth in China
Several institutions projected 1.6 million PEV sales (LDV and commercial) at the beginning of 2019, but have now down-adjusted their projections to about 1.4 million PEVs and 1.1 million passenger PEVs.
66
NEOCC results: PEV multiplier and credit conversion lead to efficiency leakage
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
CAFC Only
ICE-Hig%of LDV ICE-Avg% of LDV ICE-Low% of LDV
PHEV%of LDV BEV% of LDV
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
Dual-Credit Policy
ICE-Hig%of LDV ICE-Avg% of LDV ICE-Low% of LDV
PHEV%of LDV BEV% of LDV
Fewer efficient ICEVs (ICE-Low) if PEV CAFC multiplier and conversion from NEV credits to CAFC credits are allowed.
7
With same subsidy, consumers prefer shorter ranges
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
subs
idy-
elig
ible
BEV
pro
duct
ion,
201
7
Electric range (km)
Subsidies: 36K CNY, 71% Subsidies: 44K CNY, 29% Subsidies: 20K CNY
96.5%
84.8%
Amount per vehicle, based on 2017 policies
8
Strong PEV sales growth will likely continue, especially BEVs
• Driving factors– technology improvement– policies– consumer familiarity– expansion of license restriction to 2nd
and 3rd tier cities– BYD and Tesla effects– investments of foreign major OEMs– charging infrastructure
• Potential uncertainties– overall vehicle market– battery safety– range reduction and disappointment– Relaxation of license restriction
• Soon-to-be-finalized Dual-credit policy 2021-2023– Slightly de-emphasize long e-ranges– More credits for efficient ICEVs
9
Questions for more discussions
• Can de-emphasis of long e-ranges accelerate PEV penetration?
• How will OEMs play differently in the China EV market and what is the implication?
• Are fuel cells a distraction to vehicle electrification in China?
• How to address policy leakage on emissions and efficiency?
• Is the China EV industry technologically progressing (truly and substantially) or still policy dependent?
10
Thank you!
Work sponsored by:– Aramco Service Company
Please contact:Zhenhong LinOak Ridge National Laboratory(865) [email protected] model downloads and publications, please visit http://teem.ornl.gov
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC for the US Department of Energy
Backup
12
Adjustment of vehicle market policy
Dual-credit policy Phase 2 (2021-2023): released on Sept 2019• Adjust calculation methods of credits on every vehicle, weaken the impacts of electric
range on vehicle credits
• Increase incentives for more fuel economy conventional vehicles.
Source: GAST Strategy Consulting
1313
129115
75
020406080
100120140160180200
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
PEV battery pack cost ($/kWh) in China
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
$20,000
$22,000
$24,000
$26,000
20 30 40 50 60 70 80Prod
uctio
n co
sts (
$201
7)
MPG
Estimated Sedan production cost in China by year
2017
2050
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Public charging availability (%)
Major Assumptions – Reference Case
Analyzing technology market penetration under various cost of ownership and policy scenarios
012345678
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(L/1
00km
)
CAFC Target
14
Vehicle policy impacts on China’s market – simulated by NEOCC modelSensitivity analysis – Battery costs (Market in 2020 and battery pack cost is assumed to be $146 /kWh)
-200%
0%
200%
400%
600%
800%
1000%
50 100 150 200 250 300
Sale
s cha
nges
com
pa
red
to
curre
nt le
vel
Battery pack costs ($/kWh)
PHEV sales changes%BEV sales change%
Current battery cost
(1,139)
(422)
261
624
($1,400)($1,200)($1,000)
($800)($600)($400)($200)
$0$200$400$600$800
50% 20% 0% -20% -50%
Battery costs change level
Industry profit impacted by policy ($/vehicle)
Benchmark: 2020 market level.
15
What is the role of public charging infrastructure in market?
Vehicle policy impacts on China’s market – simulated by NEOCC model
Public charging opportunity
Batt
ery
cost
s
PEV sales growth (benchmark: 2020 market level)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%PE
V sa
les g
row
thPublic charging opportunity
Battery costs = $70/kWh
Battery costs = $290/kWh (emerging market)
Benchmark: public charging opportunity is 1% in market.
1. Battery costs are much more important on increasing the growth of PEV sales than the public charging infrastructure;
2. However, the public charging infrastructure is an effective role to contribute the PEV sales growth in the emerging market.