drug alert (august-2011)

Upload: priyadarshini-ch

Post on 06-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Drug Alert (August-2011)

    1/8

    CONTENTS

    1

    Editorial - 1

    Case Report - 2

    New Approach - 3

    Update - 4

    New Approvals - 5

    Cross Word - 7

    DRUG ALERTADR Monit or ing Centre

    Department of Pharmacology, JIPMER, Puducherry-605006, India

    Co-ordinator: Dr. C. Adithan

    Sub Co-ordinator: Dr. Steven A Dkhar

    Editors: Dr. Melvin George, Dr. Sandhiya S, Dr. Surendiran A

    Website: www.j ipmer.edu

    E-mail: [email protected]

    Volume V, Issue 3 August - 2011

    Benflu orex - A French story to rememb er ...

    Edi to r ia l

    Benfluorex, a fenflura mine d erived p rodu ct has been

    in wid e use s ince 1975 in several European and Asian

    countries. In France, the dr ug w as initially promoted as a

    hypolipidemic drug until 1987 when its therapeutic

    indication was expand ed to includ e it as an aid to dieting

    in patients with hypertriglyceridemia or overweight

    patients and diabetes. The drug was mark eted und er the

    brand name of Mediator by the ph arm aceutical comp any

    Servier. In 2007, a reassessm ent of the benefit-risk balan ce

    wa s don e by the AFSSAPS (Agence Francaise de Secur ite

    Sanitaire des Produ its de Sante), the French dru g regu lating

    agency, as there w ere case reports of cardiac valvular

    regurgi ta t ion and severe pu lmonary hypertension.

    Following this a d ecision wa s taken to restrict its use only

    to patients with diabetes wh o are overweight.

    Meanwhile a cohort stud y was u ndertaken u sing the

    French database am ong 10,48,173 d iabetic patient s du ring

    the per iod betw een 2007 and 2008. A total of 43044(4.1%)

    were exposed to benfluorex. The relative risk [RR] of

    hospitalization for an y cardiac valvular regurgitation wa s

    higher in the benfluorex grou p, crud e RR = 2.9[95% CI, 2.2

    -3.7] and ad justed RR = 3.1[95% CI, 2.4-4.0]. Adjusted RR

    for mitral regur gitation and a ortic regur gitation were 2.5

    and 4.4 respectively. There was also an increased need for

    valve replacement su rgery in these p atients. In fact it has

    come to light, that in the last 33 years since this dr ug has

    been in the m arket there h ave been atleast 500 reported

    cases of valvu lar regur gitation and several more cases of

    related hospitalizations.

    The results of this study and other similar reports

    plus its marginal benefit in d iabetes patients led to the

    drug being withdrawn by the AFSSAPS and EMA

    (European Medical Agency) in France and EU cou ntries

    respectively towards the end of 2009. However a lot of

    eyebrows w ere raised as the French regulatory bodys

    response w as rather p rotracted in the light of emerging

    eviden ce as early as 2007. Earlier case reports of similar

    kind w hich w ere noticed in Spain led to the dru g being

    with dra wn in 2005 from the Span ish mar ket. The French

    regulatory body drew a lot of flak for its sluggish response

    and a revamp ing of the w hole pharm acovigilance process

    has been m uch sough t after in the French parliament ever

    since.

    However wh at is interesting to learn is that 11 cases

    of valvular regu rgitation w ere solely detected by th eBrest University in Paris in the year 2009 due to the

    active surveillance coordinated by a chest physician,

    Irene Franchon. She went on to expose the drug by

    writing a book for the pub lic highlighting th e problems

    associated w ith benfluorex and slamming the French

    regulatory agency for their lacklustre response to the

    situa tion. Althoug h her actions have stirred a hornets

    nest in the French med ia and public, it appa rently has

    generated a p rocess of tightening the loose ends of the

    French pharmacovigilance system to prevent such

    mishaps from occurring aga in. One hopes that th e recent

    improvements in our nations p harma covigilanceprogramme w ould serve to bring out similar dan gerous

    trends an d remove such unsa fe dru gs from the Indian

    market before a disaster of this mag nitud e strikes our

    country.

    References

    1. Weill A et al. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.2010;

    19: 1256-62

    2. Tribouilloy C. Eur J Echocardiogr.2010; 11: 614-21

    3. Moulin P et al. Diabetes Metab. 2010; 36: 76-77.

    Dr. Melv in George, Dr. Radhik a A ,

    Dr. Steven A Dkhar,

    Department of Pharmacology,

    JIPMER, Pondicherry.

  • 8/2/2019 Drug Alert (August-2011)

    2/8

    2

    L-Asparginase in du ced cortical venou s th rombosis

    L-Asparginase is used for remission induction in acute

    lymph oblastic leu kemia (ALL). 16 yr old boy d iagnos ed

    as ALL received L-Aspa rginase 6000 IU/ m 2 on alternatedays d uring the repeat indu ction ph ase. He presented w ith

    headache, vomiting an d seizures. Contrast enhan ced CT

    Bra in was taken which revea led cor t i ca l venous

    thrombosis (CVT). He was started on heparin and his

    symptoms improved.

    L-Asparaginase is a bacteria-derived enzyme that

    provides specific therapy for lymphoid malignancies su ch

    as acut e lymph oblastic leukem ia (ALL) by catalyzing the

    hyd rolysis of l-asparag ine to l-aspartic acid an d dep leting

    the circulating pools of this amino acid. Although the

    capacity to syn thesize l-asparagine is constitutive in most

    normal tissu es, malignancies of lymph oid origin lack theenzym e tha t catalyzes the transformation of l-aspartic acid

    to l-asparagine (asparagine synthetase) and therefore

    depend on exogenous sou rces of l-asparagine. Despite this

    app arent specificity for lymp hoblasts, however, therap y

    with l-aspara ginase is often limited by significan t toxicity

    such as coagulation abnorm alities an d h ypersensitivity

    reactions.

    of sinovenous thrombosis in the brain. About 2% of

    c h i l d r e n t r e a t e d w i t h L - a s p a r a g i n a s e d e v e l o p

    hemorrhagic or nonh emorrhagic infarcts consequ ent tocortical sinusven ous throm bosis (CSVT).

    Treatment of CVT resulting from L-aspa raginase-

    indu ced an t i thrombin d ef ic iency includ es general

    sup portive measures, anticonvu lsants for seizures, and

    an t icoagula t ion . Fur ther L-asparag inase i s

    contraindicated. However, the key to management is

    early diagnosis by imaging as delayed institution of

    an t icoagula t ion may be fu t i l e . For the rapeu t ic

    anticoagulation, low m olecular w eight h eparin is given

    initially and th is may be continued or it may be substitu ted

    by oral anticoagulant s for 36 month s.

    We conclude that, diagnosis of CSVT in leukemic

    patients being treated with L-asparaginase requires a high

    ind ex of clinical susp icion in the presen ce of seizu res, a

    focal neurological def ic i t , and features of ra ised

    intracranial tension. Early diagnosis demands a low

    thresh old for imaging, and MRI shou ld be preferred over

    CT. Identification of relevant findings such as venous

    Venous throm bosis may cause as man y as 30% of the

    acute central nervous system events in acute leuk emias.

    The estimated risk of thrombosis during th e treatment of

    ALL in ch i ld ren i s abou t 5%. L i fe - th rea ten ing

    complications may resu lt when th e central nervous system

    is involved. L-asparaginase may impair the h emostatic

    system by redu cing the syn thesis of coagulation factors

    (includ ing fibrinogen, factor II, IX, and X) and inhibitors

    of coagulation (such as antithrombin, protein C, and

    protein S) as a consequence of asparagine depletion.

    D e s p i t e a r e d u c t i o n o f b o t h p r o c o a g u l a n t a n d

    anticoagulant activity, the h emostatic balance app ears tobe shifted tow ard s a hyp ercoagu lable state. Asparaginase-

    indu ced deficiency of antithrombin III, the most important

    end ogenou s anticoagulan t, significantly increases the risk

    infarcts, the emp ty delta sign, and absent flow in the d ural

    sinuses on CT and MR venography enables proper

    diagnosis and man agement.

    References

    1. Sbire G et a l.Brain.2005;128:47789.

    2. Caru so V et al.Blood.2006;108:221622.

    3. Vzque z E et al.Radiograph ics.2002;22:141128.

    4. Hu nau lt-Berger M et al.Haematologica.2008;93:

    148894

    5. Connor SE et al.Clin Rad iol.2002;57:44961.

    Dr. Biswajit Dubashi,

    Department of Medical Oncology,

    JIPMER, Pondicherry.

    Case Repor t

  • 8/2/2019 Drug Alert (August-2011)

    3/8

    3

    Revolution in man agement of chron ic hep atitis C: to wh at extent?

    The global prevalence of hep atitis C is around 2% and

    it accounts for 350,000 dea ths every year. Stud ies in Ind ia

    among blood d onors have noted th e prevalence of HCV

    (hepa titis C virus) infection to be be low 2%. Hep atitis C is

    also the major indication for liver tran splant . The stand ard

    of care for chronic hep atitis C has be en th e combination

    of interferon-/ peginterferon-with ribavirin. However,

    despite a long term regimen for about a year, this

    combination cannot achieve cure in about half of the

    patient s. In addition to tha t, it is also associated w ith man y

    intolerable side-effects rang ing from fatigue and flu like-

    symptoms to an aemia and severe depression. Neither of

    the tw o directly targets HCV. While interferon- boosts

    pat ients immu ne system ; ribavirin is a genera l inhibitor

    of viral rep lication.

    In May 2011, FDA approved two new oral drugs

    (protease inhibitors) for chronic hepatitis C; namely

    boceprevir and telaprevir. Both the dru gs are app roved

    for genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C infection with

    compen sated liver disease, in treatm ent nave as well as

    previously treated p atients. These dru gs are directly acting

    antivirals inhibiting non-structural (NS) protease NS3/

    4A. This se r ine p ro tease c leaves HCV encoded

    polyproteins into m ature forms of NS4A, NS4B, NS5A an d

    NS5B; so it is essential for viral replication. These d ru gs

    are approved for use in patients aged 18 years and abov e;

    only in combination w ith peginterferon- and ribavirin(PR). In phase III trials, both t hese d rugs had a significantly

    higher rates of sustained virological response (SVR)

    compared to standard treatm ent. SVR is defined as absence

    of serum HCV RNA by PCR assay 24 weeks after

    completion of therapy. Although being a surrogate end

    point of virological cur e; SVR is show n to be associated

    with su bstantially reduced all cause mortality in H CV

    patients. In a ph ase III trial among previously unt reated

    patients, boceprevir group achieved SVR in 63-66%

    compared to 38% in PR48 (peginte rferon-with ribavirin

    for 48 weeks) group . While in pat ients w ith previously

    failed th erapy SVR rates were 59-66% in boceprevir groupand 23% in PR48 group . With respect to telaprevir; ph ase

    III stud ies in treatm ent n ave patients showed SVR rates

    of 74-79% compared to 46% in PR48 grou p. In p articu lar,

    SVR rates were substan tially improved in patients ha ving

    nega tive pred ictive factors for a respon se to PR therap y,

    such as bridging fibrosis/ cirrhosis, older age, diabetes,

    HCV RNA levels > 800,000 IU/ ml or m ore. The p hase III

    trial in previously treated patients show ed SVR in 65% of

    telaprevir group compared to 17% in PR48 grou p. The

    greatest improvem ents in SVR rates (upto six times) were

    seen in prior null respond ers to PR. Among th e two, only

    telaprevir has been stud ied in previous nu ll-respond ers

    and achieved better SVR. In ad dition to h igher SVR rates,

    both the d rugs show ed considerably lower relapse rates

    also.

    Based on period ic HCV RNA levels, response gu ided

    therapy (RGT) is recommend ed for both boceprevir and

    telaprevir. Triple therapy with telaprevir + PR is given

    for 12 weeks, followed by dual therapy with PR for

    ad ditional 12 or 36 weeks. Favou rable HCV RNA levels

    could be obtained in more than half of treatment n ave

    patients, requiring total therapy for 24 weeks only. In

    case of boceprevir, therapy is initiated with PR for 4 weeks

    as a lead in phase, followed by triple therapy with

    boceprevir + PR for 24 to 32 weeks, with or without

    ad ditional 12 weeks of PR.

    The common adverse effects seen with boceprevir are

    fatigue, anemia, nau sea, headache and dysgeu sia. It causes

    anemia in up to half of the p atients, causing ad ditional

    drop in Hemoglobin to that caused by interferon-/

    r ibavir in . Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia are

    relatively rare but occur m ore frequen tly compa red to

    interferon- / ribavirin. The ad verse effects seen w ith

    telaprevir are rash, pruritus, anemia, nau sea, hemorrhoids,

    diar rhea, anor ectal discomfort, vomiting. Rash occurs in

    over 50% patients, w hich may become severe in minority

    of patients and requ ire treatment discontinuation. Anemia

    with telaprevir is comparatively less frequent than

    boceprevir, but still more frequent than interferon-/

    ribavirin. Both telaprevir and boceprevir are inhibitors

    of CYP3A4 and P-gp. As both th ese drugs are appr oved to

    be used only in combination with interferon- andribavirin, the contr aindications to interferon-/ ribavirin

    (eg. pregn an cy) also apply to these dru gs.

    The p rotease inhibitors h ave certainly revolutionized

    the treatm ent of chronic hepatitis C, by imp roving the

    outcome as well as decreasing the du ration of therapy.

    Yet certain hurdles are not yet overcome. These newer

    dru gs are not studied in genotypes other than genotype 1,

    HIV co-infection, H BV co-infection and decomp ensat ed

    cirrhosis. As these drugs only supplement rather than

    replacing the older d rugs, patients will be su bjected to

    same ad verse effects, an d possibly a few m ore.

    References

    1. Shepard CW et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:558-67.

    2. Perz JF et al. J Hep atol. 2006;45:529-38.

    3. Mukhop ad hyaya A. J Biosci. 2008;33:465-73.

    4. Poord ad F et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1195-206.

    5. Poynard T et al. Lancet. 1998;352:142632.

    6. McHutchison JG et al. N Engl J Med . 1998;339:148592.

    7. Jacobson IM et al. Hepatology. 2010;52:427A.

    8. Zeuzem S et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2417-28.

    Dr. Anil Rajani, Dr. Steven A Dkhar

    Department of Pharmacology

    JIPMER, Pondicherry.

    New Approach

  • 8/2/2019 Drug Alert (August-2011)

    4/8

    4

    Tardive dyskinesia: an up date

    First described by Faurbye in 1964, tard ive dyskinesia

    (TD) is one of th e most serious ad verse effects of long-

    term an tipsychotic treatm ent. TD consists of involun tary

    movemen ts that have both faster and slower components(choreo-athetoid movements), with a tendency to

    involve the lips, tongu e, facial mu scles, and r espirator y

    muscles. A variant form, tardive dystonia, consists of

    sustained postu res of larger muscles in the n eck and trunk.

    Clinical features:

    Tardive d yskinesia affects aroun d 20-30% of patients

    taking long-term an tipsychotics, with an approximate risk

    of 3-5% per year of treatm ent. Factors associated w ith th e

    developmen t of TD includ e extremes of age, organic brain

    d isorders , i r regu la r t rea tment , h igh-po tency

    ant ipsychotic treatment, acute extrapyra mida l side-effects

    (EPS), and u se of an ticholinergic dr ug s. An Indian stu dy

    found male gender , early age of onset of mental illness,

    an d p oor functioning to be s ignificant risk factors. TD is

    potentially irreversible, and the rate of reversibility

    declines w ith age. Though rarely fatal on its ow n, TD is

    disfigu ring, and m ay be associated w ith a poorer outcome

    of schizophr enia and increased long-term mortality. It m ay

    also contribute to the stigma faced by mentally ill patients

    receiving d rug therapy.

    Atypical antipsychotics and the risk of TD:

    The most widely accepted p athop hysiological mod el

    for TD is dopamine (D 2) receptor supersensitivityfollowing prolonged blockade, though other theories

    have been proposed Theoretically, the newer or atypical

    antipsychotics which are less potent D2

    blockers and

    cause less acute EPS should carry a lowe r risk of TD.

    However, long-term stud ies in real-world settings, such

    as the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention

    Effectiveness (CATIE) found tha t th ese differences were

    small and did not contribute significantly to cost-

    effectiveness. A stud y from Europe found that at ypical

    an tipsychotics may ha ve a significan tly lower risk of TD

    in the long term, after 5 or more years of treatmen t.

    Prevention of TD:As there is no cure for TD, prevention is vital.

    Antipsychotics should be prescribed only for valid

    indications, such as schizophrenia and man ia, by trained

    medical personnel. The need for long-term treatment

    should be periodically assessed. If older d rugs are used ,

    lower d oses are pr eferred. Regular checks for TD, using a

    structured instrum ent such as the Abnormal Involuntary

    Movement Scale (AIMS), are recommended every 6

    months . Efforts should be m ade to ensu re that patientstake their medication regularly, and anticholinergics

    should be prescribed only when necessary. Medical

    conditions that may increase the risk of TD, such as diabetes

    mellitus and iron deficiency, shou ld be corrected.

    Treating TD:

    No sing le effective treatm ent exists. Dose redu ction

    and dru g d iscontinua tion are often tried, but there is little

    eviden ce for this pra ctice. Cha nging from a typ ical to an

    atypical drug, su ch as risperidone, olanzapine, qu etiapine

    or aripipra zole, may be ben eficial. Clozap ine is useful in

    both TD and tardive dystonia, bu t is reserved for resistant

    cases because of its ad verse e ffect profile. Tetrabena zine,

    wh ich d epletes central dop amine, has sh own efficacy in a

    controlled trial. Benzodiazepines have a modest but

    significant effect. Other treatment approaches, such as

    cholinesterase inhibitors and d eep brain stimu lation, are

    still experimental. Finally, supp lementation w ith v itamin

    E (400-1600 IU/ day ) may p revent or slow th e progression

    of TD.

    Pharm acogenetics and TD :

    An exc i t ing a rea o f cur ren t resea rch i s the

    identification of genetic factors linked with TD, which

    may allow high-risk p atients to be identified beforestarting treatment. Various cand idate genes hav e been

    proposed , but r esults are equ ivocal in most cases. Stud ies

    from India suggest th at polymorphisms in serotonin (5-

    HT2) receptor genes, and in the dopamine D

    3receptor gene,

    may be as sociated with a n increased r isk of TD.

    Further work in this area, and on developing non-

    dop amine based an tipsychotics, wou ld represent a major

    advan ce in man aging and treating th is distressing ad verse

    effect.

    Further reading:

    1. Sachd ev PS. Aust N Z J Psychiatr . 2000; 34:355-369.

    2. Margolese HC et al. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50:541-547.

    3. Margolese HC et al. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50:703-714.

    Dr. Ravi Philip Rajkumar

    Department of Psychiatry

    JIPMER, Pondicherry.

    Linaglip tin A new an d b etter choice of drug in Type 2 Diab etes Mellitus

    Type 2 diabetes m ellitu s is one of the leading caus es

    of death w orldwide. Gliptins are the new class of drugs

    used in type 2 diabetes mellitus and linagliptin is thelatest ad d ition to this grou p. Linagliptin (Trad e nam e-

    TRADJENTA) is recomm end ed a s 5 m g once d aily ta blet.

    This group of drugs acts by inhibiting the enzyme

    dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) which is responsible for

    the inactivation of incretins su ch as glucagon like peptide

    1 (GLP-1) and glucose-d epend ent insulinotrop ic pep tide(GIP). These peptides control the dietary glucose

    dependent release of insulin. DPP-4 inhibitors increase

    the c i rcu la t ing GLP-1 leve l s to the h igh normal

    U p d a t e

  • 8/2/2019 Drug Alert (August-2011)

    5/8

    List of newly ap p roved drugs in Ind ia from 01-01-2011 to 30-06-2011

    New Approvals

    S.No.

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    Indication

    For the treatment of patients with

    acu te pa in fu l muscu loske le ta l

    conditions

    For the treatment of patients with

    diabetic polyneuropath y

    For treatment of hyper pigmentry

    disorders

    For the treatment of iron deficiencyin adu lts wh en oral iron preparations

    are ineffective or cannot be used.

    Date of issue

    05.01.11

    05.01.11

    31.01.11

    11.02.11

    Name of Drug

    S (+) Etodolac 300mg +Thiocolchicoside

    8mg Tablet

    Metformin H Cl IP 500mg + Alpha Lipoic

    Acid USP 200mg Tablet

    Hyd roquinone USP 2% w/ w + Tretinoin

    USP 0.025% w/ w + Allant oin USP 1%w/

    w Gel

    Ferr ic Carboxymaltose equivalent toelement al Iron50mg/ ml Injection

    5

    physiological range. They n ot only improve the insulin

    secretion from the pancreas bu t also decrease the glucagon

    outp ut from cells of islets of p ancreas.

    DPP-4 inhibitors carry the advantage over GLP-1

    receptor agonists in a wa y that they can be given orally;

    have fewer adverse events and do not cause w eight loss,

    wh ile possessing s imilar efficacy as compar ed t o GLP-1

    agonists in redu cing plasma glucose levels. These d rugs

    also enhance the sur vival of cells and stimulate their

    growth , thu s preserving cell mass. Among th e gliptins

    sitagliptin, saxagliptin and vildagliptin are already

    app roved. The approval of alogliptin is delayed because

    of the insu fficient d ata regarding its cardiovascular risks.

    Linagliptin is the recent dr ug approved by US-FDA on

    May 2011.

    Linagliptin is a potent an d long acting dru g am ong

    the gliptins and has long lasting effect on glucose

    tolerance. Gliptins can be used as monotherapy or in

    combination with metformin, thiazolidinediones and

    sulfonylureas. The other drugs such as sitagliptin,

    saxagliptin and vildagliptin have the limitation of

    requiring d ose redu ction in renal d ysfunction. How ever,

    linagliptin has insign ificant rena l clearance and hen ce it

    can be used safely in patients with ren al dysfun ction and

    it does not need dose adjustment in liver dysfunction.

    Linagliptin has lower drug interactions with CYP3A4

    substrate dru gs compared to other gliptins.

    In clinical stud ies for safety a nd efficacy, linagliptin

    showed significant red u ction in HbA1C

    (-0.4% from base

    line), fasting plasma glucose and 2 hour post-prandial

    plasma glucose levels. Linagliptin 5 mg once daily was

    stud ied as m onotherapy in two p lacebo-controlled trials

    o f 18 and 24 weeks dura t ion . I t was found tha t

    nasopharyngitis occurred in more than 5% of patients

    receiving linagliptin (n=2566) and more comm only than

    pa tients w ho received p lacebo (n=1183, 5.8% vs 5.5%). A

    stud y comparing th e ad verse effects of linagliptin and

    glimepiride as add on therapy to metformin showed

    greater occurren ce of arthralgia, back pain and head ache

    in the group treated with linagliptin. In another stud y it

    was shown that linagliptin had similar effect on prod ucing

    hypoglycemia compared to placebo when used as

    monotherapy or in combina t ion w i th met formin .However, when it was combined with sulphonylurea and

    metformin (n=791), they prod uced a greater incidence of

    hyp oglycemia compared to the combination of p lacebo

    with sulphonylurea and metformin (n=263,22.9% vs

    14.8%). Pancreatitis has also been reported with linagliptin

    in clinical trials.

    The effect of linagliptin on long term use and on

    immu ne system is yet to be explored. It is not effective in

    type 1 diabetes mellitus and no adequ ate information is

    available regard ing the u se of linagliptin in combination

    with insulin. It is not recommen ded for use in diabetic

    ketoacidosis as its efficacy is not established in thiscondition.

    Linagliptin is yet to be marketed in India. With some

    advantages over other oral anti-diabetic agents, linagliptin

    is an alternative in the treatment of type 2 d iabetes mellitus.

    Further reading:

    1. Pratley R. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23:91931

    2. Blech S et al. Drug Met ab Dispos. 2010;38:667-78.

    3. Thomas L et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009;328:556-63.

    4. Heise T et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;11:786-94.

    Dr. Alphienes St anley, Dr. Shewade DG

    Department of Pharmacology,

    JIPMER, Pondicherry.

  • 8/2/2019 Drug Alert (August-2011)

    6/8

    6

    S.No. Indication Date of issueName of Drug

    5.

    6.

    7.

    8.

    9.

    10.

    11.

    12.

    13.

    14.

    Pidotimod Tablet 400 mg/ 800 mg & Oral

    Solution 400 mg/ 800 mg per 7ml

    Iloper idone Tab le ts 1mg/ 2mg/ 4mg/

    6mg/ 8mg/ 10mg/ 12mg

    Cal f lung sur f ac tan t In t r a t r achea l

    Suspension containing Phospholipids...

    35mg (containing 26 mg ph osphatidy l-

    choline of which 16mg is disaturated

    phosphatidylcholine) Proteins....0.65mg

    (includ ing 0.26mg of surfactant associated

    proteins B) per ml

    Eslicarbazepine Acetate Tablets 200mg/

    400mg/ 600mg/ 800mg

    Aspirin (EC Tablets) 75mg/ 75mg / 150mg

    +Rosuvastatin (Granu les) 5mg/ 10mg/

    10mg Capsules

    Ilapra zole Tablets 5mg/ 10mg

    Asenapine Maleate Sublingual Tablets

    5mg/ 10mg

    Tapentad ol Hy dr ochlorid e Tablets 50mg/

    75mg/ 100mg

    Diclofenac Coles tyramine 145.6 mg

    cor responding to 75mg Dic lo fenac

    Sodium Capsules.

    1. PROBIO:

    Each sachet (1g) contain s:

    Tota l Probio t ic.... N ot less tha n 1.25

    Billion CFU (Lactobacillus acidop hilus,

    Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacte-

    rium longum , Saccharom yces boulardii)

    2. PROBIO & PR EBIO (F)s

    Each sachet (1g) contain s:

    Prob io (CMP 5)Total Probi otic...Not less

    than 1.25 Billion CFU (Lactobacillus

    acidophilus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus,

    Bifidobacterium longum, Saccharomycesboulardii)

    Fructo Oligo Saccharides.. 100mg

    For infect ions of the respiratory

    system in secondary and primary

    immu nodeficiency with alteration

    in maturation of T cells in adults

    only.

    For the acute treatment of adults

    with schizophrenia.

    (a). As a prophylaxis therapy for

    premature in fan t s

  • 8/2/2019 Drug Alert (August-2011)

    7/8

    Pharmacology Cross Word

    3. Autocoid, causes hypertrichosis as an adverse

    effect(11)

    4. Side-effect of inhalational Corticosteroids (9)

    5. Used for the treatment of Diabetic gastroparesis

    (12)

    6. Used for the treatmen t of nausea and v omiting,

    associated w ith cancer chemotherap y (10)

    7. Causes hand and foot syndrom e (12)

    8. Opioid an tagonis t useful for pos toperat ive

    paralytic ileus (9) Dr. Mani Prabhu

    Department of Pharmacology, JIPMER, Puducherry.

    Across

    1. Monoclonal an tibody, characteristically causes

    septal perforation (11)

    9. Cell w all synthesis inh ibitor, indicated on ly for

    topical use (10)

    10. Inhalat ional drug, used oral ly for sys temic

    mastocytosis (14)

    11. Shortest acting anti-depressant (10)

    Down

    2. Used as an adjuvant to Sodium stilbogluconate

    in the treatm ent of kala azar (11)

    Cross Word

    S.N o. In dication Date of issueName of Drug

    15.

    16.

    3. PROBIO & PREBIO (D)

    Each sachet (1.3g) contains:

    Probio (CMP 5)Total probiotic... no t less

    than 1.25 bill ion CFU (Lactobacillus

    acidophilus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus,

    Bifidobacterium longum, Saccharomycesboulardii)

    Fructo Oligo Saccharides..... 1000 mg

    Silodosin Capsules2mg/ 4mg/ 8mg

    Tiapr ide H yd rochloride Tablets 25mg/

    50mg/ 100mg

    For the t r ea tment o f s igns and

    symptoms of ben ign p ros ta t i c

    hyp erplasia (BPH) in ad ults only.

    For the treatment of agitation and

    aggressiveness in ad ult patients with

    cognitive impairment.

    23.06.11

    23.06.11

    1 2 3

    4

    5 6

    8

    9

    1 0

    1 1

    7

    7

    Dr. Saranya Vilvan

    Department of Pharmacology, JIPMER, Puducherry.

    Reference: www.cdsco.nic.in

  • 8/2/2019 Drug Alert (August-2011)

    8/8

    8

    Attention

    Interested Faculty an d Senior/ Ju nior residents of JIPMER may contribu te articles for forth

    coming issues of DRUG ALERT. Your articles may include short drug reviews, adverse drug

    reactions, ph armacotherapy and other therapeutical dilemmas related to d rug therapy.

    For further details kindly contact the address given below:

    Email: m elvingeor ge2003@gm ail.com ; sandhiyaselvara jan @gmail.com

    Phon e No: 6361/ 6359

    Gu idelines for reporting of Ad verse Dru g Reactions

    ADR Monitoring Centre, Department of Pharmacology, JIPMER, Pondicherry invites reports

    of all suspected adverse reactions to drugs and other medicinal substances, including herbals,

    traditional and complementary medicines, blood products, medical devices and vaccines.

    Report even if:

    The drug is an established one and the adv erse

    dru g reaction is well known

    You are not certain the produ ct caused adverse

    event

    You d ont ha ve all the d etails

    Who can report?

    Any h ealth care professional (doctors including

    in te rns , r es iden ts , den t i s t s , nu r ses and

    pharmacists)

    Where to report: You can rep ort online at w ww.jipmer.edu or send your reports to:

    Dr. C. Adithan , Co-ordin ator

    ADR Monitoring Centre

    Department of Pharm acology, JIPMER, Pondicherry-605006.

    Note:If you are at JIPM ER you can also use the yellow forms provided in wards.

    Drug Information Service

    C Have queries on therapy of disease? C Want to know th e safety of a drug?

    C Need to know about d rug interactions? C Searching for information about new dr ugs?

    We are here to help you

    Drug Information CentreDepa rtm ent of Pharm acology, JIPMER, Puducherry-605 006.

    Mob ile No: 8056986804; Pho ne: 2277369; Ext: 6359.

    E-mail: ad rjipm er@gm ail.com

    Cross W ord Answ ers

    Across

    1. Bev aciz um ab

    9. Ba cit ra cin

    10. Cromolynsod ium

    11. Nefazodone

    Down

    2. A llop ur in ol

    3. Bim a top rost

    4. Dysp hon ia

    5. Er yt hro my cin

    6. Dr on abin ol

    7. Ca pe cit ab in e

    8. Alvim op an