drilled cast in situ concrete pile design v1.1
TRANSCRIPT
PROJECT :
CLIENT : JOB NO. :
Drilled Cast-in-place Pile Design Based on ACI 318-11
DESIGN CRITERIA
1.
2.
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
CONCRETE STRENGTH = 4 ksi
VERT. REBAR YIELD STRESS = 60 ksiPILE DIAMETER D = 24 inPILE LENGTH L = 35 ft
FACTORED AXIAL LOAD = 100 k
FACTORED MOMENT LOAD = 200 ft-k
FACTORED SHEAR LOAD = 20 kPILE VERT. REINF. 8 # 7SEISMIC DESIGN (ACI 21.12.4) ? YesLATERAL REINF. OPTION (0=Spirals, 1=Ties) 1 Ties
LATERAL REINFORCEMENT # 4 @ 6 in o.c.(spacing 3.0 in o.c. at top end of 10.0 ft.)
(2012 IBC 1810.3.9 & ACI 21.12.4)
9 in & 14 in )
THE PILE DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
ANALYSISCHECK PILE LIMITATIONS
4 ksi > 4 ksi [Satisfactory]
D = 24 in > MAX( L / 30 , 12 in) [Satisfactory]
CHECK FLEXURAL & AXIAL CAPACITY
ASSUME FIX HEAD CONDITION IF Ldh & Lhk COMPLY WITH THE TENSION DEVELOPMENT. OTHERWISE PINNED AT TOP.
FROM PILE CAP BALANCED LOADS & REACTIONS, DETERMINE MAX SECTION FORCES OF SINGLE PILE, Pu, Mu, & Vu.
fc'
fy
Pu
Mu
Vu
( Ldh = Lhk =
fc' =
941.1 kips., (at max axial load, ACI 318-11, Sec. 10.3.6.2)
where F = 0.8 , ACI 318-11, Sec. 10.3.6.1 or 10.3.6.2
0.65 (ACI 318-11, Sec.9.3.2.2)
452 4.80
AT COMPRESSION ONLY
AT MAXIMUM LOAD
AT 0 % TENSION
AT 25 % TENSION
AT 50 % TENSION
AT BALANCED CONDITION
AT FLEXURE ONLY
AT TENSION ONLY
10 in (at balanced strain condition, ACI 10.3.2)
= 0.656 (ACI 318-11, Fig. R9.3.2)
where 12 in 0.002069
d = 20.06 in, (ACI 7.7.1) 0.85 ( ACI 318-11, Sec. 10.2.7.3 )
183
246 100 kips >
= 0.08 (ACI 318-11, Section 10.9) = 0.011
= 0.005 (2012 IBC 1810.3.9.4.2)
f Pmax =F f [ 0.85 fc' (Ag - Ast) + fy Ast] =
f =
Ag = in2. Ast = in2.
f Pn (k)
AT e t = 0.002
AT e t = 0.005
f Mn (ft-k)
a = Cbb1 =
f =0.75 + ( et - 0.002 ) (50), for Spiral
0.65 + ( et - 0.002 ) (250 / 3), for Ties
Cb = d ec / (ec + es) = et =
b1 =
f Mn = 0.9 Mn = ft-kips @ Pn = 0, (ACI 318-11, Sec. 9.3.2) ,& et,max = 0.004, (ACI 318-11, Sec. 10.3.5)
f Mn = ft-kips @ Pu = Mu
rmax rprovd
rmin
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY
90 kips, (ACI 318-11 Sec. 11.1.1)
> [Satisfactory]where 0.75 (ACI 318-11 Sec. 9.3.2.3)
316 0.40
40.0 kips, (ACI 318-11 Sec. 11.2.1, 11.2.1.3)
80.3 kips, (ACI 318-11 Sec. 11.4.7.2 & 11.4.7.9)
= 10.5 (2012 IBC 1810.3.9.4.2) =
= 1
0.008 < 0.008 [Satisfactory] (ACI 318-11 Sec. 21.12.4.4 & 21.6.4.1)
DETERMINE FIX HEAD CONDITION
11 9 in(ACI 318-11 12.5.2)
= 14 in, (ACI 318-11, Fig. R12.5)
where = 0.875 in
= 0.8
= 1.0 (1.2 for epoxy-coated, ACI 318-11 12.2.4)= 1.0 (normal weight)= 0.7 (#11 or smaller, cover > 2.5" & side >2.0",
ACI 318-11 12.5.3)
f Vn = f (Vs + Vc) =
Vu
f =
A0 = in2. Av = in2. fy =
Vc = 2 (fc')0.5A0 =
Vs = MIN (d fy Av / s , 8 (fc')0.5A0) =
smax sprovd
smin
rs = 0.12 fc' / fyt = rs,provd =
db =
Lhk
db
r required / r provided ( A s,reqd / A s,provd , ACI 318, 12.2.5)
ye
l h
PAGE : DESIGN BY : UsmanREVIEW BY :
Drilled Cast-in-place Pile Design Based on ACI 318-11
1.
THEY ARE NON-LINEAR SET AND EQUAL AT ALL TOPOF PILES FOR RIGID PILE CAP. USING LINEAR SPRINGS TO MODEL THEM IS INADEQUATE.
2. PILE CAPS SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED BY TIES
COLUMN LOADING. (2012 IBC 1810.3.13). TO CONSIDERCONCRETE TENSION CREAKED, THE TIE BEAMSHOULD NOT BE LATERAL REACTION MEMBER.
(2012 IBC Table 1808.8.1)
(2012 IBC 1810.3.5.2)
COMPLY WITH THE TENSION DEVELOPMENT. OTHERWISE PINNED AT TOP.
FROM PILE CAP BALANCED LOADS & REACTIONS, DETERMINE MAX SECTION FORCES OF SINGLE PILE, Pu, Mu, & Vu.
PILE TOP SHEAR, Vu, & MOMENT, Mu, RELATIONSHIP
MUST BE FROM SOIL REPORT (RV vs RM) DIAGRAM.
WITH Min(0.25, SDS/10) TIMES AXIAL VERT
kips., (at max axial load, ACI 318-11, Sec. 10.3.6.2)
> [Satisfactory]
(cont'd)
AT COMPRESSION ONLY 941 0
AT MAXIMUM LOAD 941 132
AT 0 % TENSION 789 208
AT 25 % TENSION 651 250
AT 50 % TENSION 536 267
367 270
AT BALANCED CONDITION 360 272
153 279
AT FLEXURE ONLY 0 183
AT TENSION ONLY -259 0
(ACI 318-11, Fig. R9.3.2)
0.003
( ACI 318-11, Sec. 10.2.7.3 )
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
Pu
f Pn (kips) f Mn (ft-kips)
AT e t = 0.002
AT e t = 0.005
ec =
= 0.004, (ACI 318-11, Sec. 10.3.5)
60 ksi
kips, (ACI 318-11 Sec. 11.4.7.2 & 11.4.7.9)
6 in
[Satisfactory]
(ACI 318-11 Sec. 21.12.4.4 & 21.6.4.1)
THEY ARE NON-LINEAR SET AND EQUAL AT ALL TOPOF PILES FOR RIGID PILE CAP. USING LINEAR SPRINGS TO MODEL THEM IS INADEQUATE.PILE CAPS SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED BY TIES
COLUMN LOADING. (2012 IBC 1810.3.13). TO CONSIDERCONCRETE TENSION CREAKED, THE TIE BEAMSHOULD NOT BE LATERAL REACTION MEMBER.
, & MOMENT, Mu, RELATIONSHIP
MUST BE FROM SOIL REPORT (RV vs RM) DIAGRAM.
/10) TIMES AXIAL VERT
Pile foundation - bearing resistanceExample 8.11
Geometry of pile:
Diameter of pile = 1 m 9
Length of pile = 10 m 0.7
Loading on pile:
Permanent = 2670 kN 1.2
Variable = 0 kN 1.6Soil Properties:
Borehole No.: 1 2 3 4
65 62 70 73
90 79 96 100
0.7853982
Borehole No.: 1 2 3 4
Base resistance: 636.2 558.4 678.6 706.9
Shaft resistance: 1429.4 1363.5 1539.4 1605.4
Total resistance: 2065.6 1921.9 2218.0 2312.2
2129.4
1921.9 (Borehole No.: 2)
1774.5 kN
1201.2 kN
1201.2 kN
349.0 kN
852.2 kN
Combination 1:design resistance = 1169.44 kNdesign actions = 3604.5 kNOverdesign factor = 0.32
Combination 2:
Nc = a =
x3 = x4 =
Mean undrained strength along shaft, cu,
shaft:Mean undrained strength at base, cu, base:
Area of base of pile, Ab m2
Rc; mean
Rc; min
Rc; k (mean) =
Rc; k (min) =
Selected Rc; k =
characteristic base resistance, Rb; k:
characteristic shaft resistance, Rs; k:
design resistance = 896.2028 kNdesign actions = 2670 kNOverdesign factor = 0.34
kPa
kPa
base shaft
645.0 1484.4
558.4 1363.5
2