dr.$fa’h$birol$ ieachief$economist$...

17
© OECD/IEA 2013 Dr. Fa’h BIROL IEA Chief Economist New York, 20 June 2013

Upload: others

Post on 07-Jun-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

Dr.  Fa'h  BIROL  IEA  Chief  Economist  

New  York,  20  June  2013  

Page 2: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

Context  

n  Climate  change  is  slipping  down  the  policy  agenda,  even  as  the  scien'fic  evidence  con'nues  to  accumulate  

n  Energy  sector  accounts  for  two-­‐thirds  of  greenhouse  gas  emissions    

n  Mixed  news  on  energy  trends  

Ø Price  dynamics  between  gas  and  coal  support  emissions  reduc5ons  in  some  regions,  but  impede  them  in  others  

Ø Renewables  are  on  the  rise,  but  investment  slowed  in  2012  

Ø Efficiency  policies  are  gaining  momentum  in  many  countries  

Ø Nuclear  is  facing  challenges  and  CCS  s5ll  remains  distant  

Page 3: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

CO2  emissions  at  record  high  in  2012  

Change  in  energy-­‐related  CO2  emissions,  2012  

CO2  emissions  grew  by  1.4%  to  reach  31.6  Gt  in  2012,  but  trends  vary  by  country  

-­‐300  

-­‐200  

-­‐100  

0  

100  

200  

300  

400  

500  

World   China   Japan   European  Union  

United  States  

Mt  CO2  

Middle  East  

India  

Page 4: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

700  

750  

800  

850  

900  

2003   2006   2009   2012  

gCO2  /  k

Wh  

China  

400  

450  

500  

550  

600  

2003   2006   2009   2012  

gCO2  /  k

Wh  

United  States  

The  two  largest  emiRers  make  encouraging  steps  toward  decarbonisa'on…  

CO2  emissions  per  unit  of  electricity  genera'on  

In  2012,  total  CO2  emissions  in  the  US  were  back  at  the  level  of  the  mid-­‐1990s,    while  total  CO2  emissions  growth  in  China  was  one  of  the  lowest  in  the  last  decade  

Page 5: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

…but  the  world  is  s'll  moving  in    the  wrong  direc'on  

Global  energy-­‐related  CO2  emissions  

CO2  emissions  trends  point  to  a  long-­‐term  temperature  increase  of  up  to  5.3  °C  

1890   1910   1930   1950   1970   1990   2012  

4  

8  

12  

16  

20  

24  

28  

32  Gt  

DissoluJon  of  the  Soviet  Union  

End  of  World  War  II  

1st  oil  price  shock  

Global  economic  downturn  

2nd  oil  price  shock  

Great  depression  

Page 6: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

Four  measures  to  keep  the  2  °C  target  alive  

n  Na'onal  efforts  in  this  decade  need  to  buy  'me  for  an  interna'onal  agreement,  expected  to  come  into  force  in  2020  

n  Measures  to  2020  should  meet  key  criteria:  

Ø No  harm  to  countries’  economic  growth  

Ø Significant  near-­‐term  emissions  reduc5ons  

Ø Reliance  only  on  exis5ng  technologies  and  proven  policies  

Ø Significant  na5onal  benefits  other  than  climate  change  mi5ga5on  

n  Our  4-­‐for-­‐2  °C  Scenario  proposes  four  measures  that  meet  these  criteria  

Page 7: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

Four  measures  can  stop    emissions  growth  by  2020  

Emissions  savings  in  the  4-­‐for-­‐2  °C  Scenario,  2020  

Four  measures  can  stop  the  growth  in  emissions  by  2020  at  no  net  economic  cost,  reducing  emissions  by  3.1  Gt,  80%  of  the  savings  required  for  a  2  °C  path  

49%  

21%  

18%  

12%   Implement  selected  energy  efficiency    

policies    

Limit  use  of    inefficient  coal  power  plants  

Reduce  methane  releases  from  upstream  

oil  and  gas  

ParJal  removal  of    fossil-­‐fuel  subsidies  

Page 8: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

Measure  1:  Improve  energy  efficiency  

Emissions  savings  in  the  4-­‐for-­‐2  °C  Scenario,  2020  

Energy  efficiency  reduces  emissions  by  1.5  Gt,  led  by  minimum  energy  performance  standards  –  addiQonal  investment  is  more  than  offset  by  fuel  bill  savings    

20%   40%  

Buildings  

Industry  

Transport  

80%   100%  

Industrial  motors  

60%  

Hea'ng  &  cooling   Appliances  &  ligh'ng  

Road  

Share  of  efficiency  savings  

Page 9: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

Measure  2:  Limit  the  use  of  inefficient  coal  power  plants  

Change  in  electricity  demand  &  coal-­‐fired  electricity  genera'on  from  the  least-­‐efficient  plants,  2020  

Energy  efficiency  and  reducing  the  role  of  the  least-­‐efficient  coal  power  plants    have  important  co-­‐benefits  for  local  air  polluQon  

-­‐1  000  

-­‐  800  

-­‐  600  

-­‐  400  

-­‐  200  

United  States  

European  Union   China   India  

Lower  electricity  demand  

Lower  electricity  generaJon  from  least-­‐  efficient  coal  plants  

TWh   0  

Page 10: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

Measure  3:  Reduce  methane  releases  into  the  atmosphere  

Methane  emissions  from  the  upstream  oil  and  gas  industry,  2020  

In  2010,  global  methane  releases  were  1.1  Gt  CO2-­‐eq;    halving  the  level  in  2020  adds  around  0.5%  to  cumulaQve  upstream  investment    

50  

100  

150  

200  

250  

300  

350  

United  States  

Other  OECD  

Middle  East  

Russia   Africa   Other  Non-­‐OECD  

ReducJon  in  4-­‐for-­‐2  °C  Scenario  

Mt  CO2-­‐eq  

Page 11: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

Measure  4:  Par'al  removal  of    fossil-­‐fuel  subsidies  

Savings  in  the  4-­‐for-­‐2  °C  Scenario:  360  Mt  

Fossil-­‐fuel  subsidies  in  2011  were  equivalent  to  an  incenQve  of  $110  per  tonne  of  CO2  

Middle  East  54%  

Africa  15%  

Russia  

Other  14%  

7%  La'n    

America  11%  

Page 12: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

The  energy  sector  needs  to  adapt    to  climate  change  

The  energy  sector  needs  to  increase  its  resilience  to  the  physical  impacts    of  climate  change  

©  Natural  hazards  adapted  from  Munich  RE  (2011)  

o C

o C

o C

o C

o C o C

o C

o C o C o C

Increase  of  droughts  and/or  heat  waves    

Power  plant  cooling  impacted  

Page 13: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

Change  in  tropical    cyclones  and  storms  

Typical  cyclones    and  track  direc'ons  

The  energy  sector  needs  to  adapt    to  climate  change  

The  energy  sector  needs  to  increase  its  resilience  to  the  physical  impacts    of  climate  change  

Exposed  oil  and    gas  infrastructure  

©  Natural  hazards  adapted  from  Munich  RE  (2011)  

Page 14: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

Some  fossil-­‐fuel  reserves  may  remain  underground  

Poten'al  CO2  emissions  from  proven  fossil-­‐fuel  reserves  to  2050  

On  today’s  trends,  half  of  the  proven  fossil-­‐fuel  reserves  would  be  leX  undeveloped  to  2050  –  stronger  climate  acQon  would  increase  the  share  

 0  

 400  

 800  

1  200  

1  600  

2  000  

Coal   Oil   Gas  

If  all  proven  reserves  were  used  

New  Policies  Scenario  

Gt  

450  Scenario  

AddiJonal  emissions  in  New  Policies  Scenario  

–  stronger  climate  acQon  would  increase  the  share  

Page 15: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

A  diverse  poreolio  maRers  in    the  power  sector  

Net  revenues  for  new  power  plants  by  scenario,  2012-­‐2035  

Under  a  2  °C  path,  total  net  revenues  for  new  power  plants  are  $3  trillion  higher  –    

2  

4  

6  

8  

Nuclear   Fossil  fuels  Renewables  

New  Policies  Scenario  

450  Scenario  

Trillion  dollars  (2011)  

CCS  fiaed  

 CCS  is  an  effecQve  protecQon  strategy  for  fossil  fuel  assets  

Page 16: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

Key  messages  

n  Despite  encouraging  steps  in  some  countries,  global  emissions  keep  rising  and  the  scien'fic  evidence  of  climate  change  increases  

n  Early  na'onal  ac'on  is  required  while  nego'a'ng  towards  a  global  deal  in  Paris  in  2015  that  then  comes  into  force  by  2020  

n  Four  measures  can  stop  emissions  growth  by  2020  and  keep  the  2°C  target  alive,  without  harming  economic  growth  

n  There  is  a  need  for  parallel  ac'on  to  deploy  cri'cal  low-­‐carbon  technologies  at  scale  aher  2020,  including  CCS  

n  The  energy  sector  must  adapt  to  climate  change,  both  in  the  resilience  of  its  exis'ng  assets  and  in  future  investment  decisions  

Page 17: Dr.$Fa’h$BIROL$ IEAChief$Economist$ New$York,$20$June$2013$energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/home... · ©"OECD/IEA"2013"" Context$! Climatechangeisslippingdownthepolicyagenda,$

©  OECD/IEA  2013    

www.worldenergyoutlook.org/energyclimatemap