draft-rkhd-mpls-tp-sd-00 ietf 78 july 2010 rafi ram ([email protected])[email protected] masahiro...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Draft-rkhd-mpls-tp-sd-00 IETF 78 July 2010 Rafi Ram (rafir@orckit.com)rafir@orckit.com Masahiro Daikoku (ms-daikoku@kddi.com)ms-daikoku@kddi.com](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f355503460f94c53bd5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
draft-rkhd-mpls-tp-sd-00
IETF 78 July 2010
Rafi Ram( [email protected])Masahiro Daikoku( [email protected])
![Page 2: Draft-rkhd-mpls-tp-sd-00 IETF 78 July 2010 Rafi Ram (rafir@orckit.com)rafir@orckit.com Masahiro Daikoku (ms-daikoku@kddi.com)ms-daikoku@kddi.com](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f355503460f94c53bd5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Problem Statement
• Provide carrier view guide lines for signal degrade detection for protection triggering
• Suggest SD detection approach originating from server MEP sub-layer
• Provide end-to-end view on architecture of :– Signal degrade detection – Signal degrade condition notification– Signal degrade consideration in protection switching
![Page 3: Draft-rkhd-mpls-tp-sd-00 IETF 78 July 2010 Rafi Ram (rafir@orckit.com)rafir@orckit.com Masahiro Daikoku (ms-daikoku@kddi.com)ms-daikoku@kddi.com](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f355503460f94c53bd5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Guide Lines for SD Detection )1(
• Method MUST not disrupt the forwarded services – e.g. add delay or jitter to real time traffic
• Criterion for determining signal degrade MUST be agnostic to :– Length and rate of frames transmitted– Traffic class and drop precedence marking of
frames– Link congestion level
![Page 4: Draft-rkhd-mpls-tp-sd-00 IETF 78 July 2010 Rafi Ram (rafir@orckit.com)rafir@orckit.com Masahiro Daikoku (ms-daikoku@kddi.com)ms-daikoku@kddi.com](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f355503460f94c53bd5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Guide Lines for SD Detection )2(
• Method SHOULD be able to detect low BER condition
• Method SHOULD have low miss-detection and false alarm probabilities
• Method SHOULD be agnostic to number of LSPs or PWs forwarded over the link
• Method for determining signal degrade is RECOMMENDED not to require transmission of traffic exclusively dedicated for this purpose
![Page 5: Draft-rkhd-mpls-tp-sd-00 IETF 78 July 2010 Rafi Ram (rafir@orckit.com)rafir@orckit.com Masahiro Daikoku (ms-daikoku@kddi.com)ms-daikoku@kddi.com](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f355503460f94c53bd5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Examples for SD Detection Methods
• 1GE PCS : Measurement of rate of 10bit code violations and dispersion errors
• 10GE PCS : Measurement of rate of errored 66bit block headers
• Note : These examples work as long as the layer carrying the information used for SD detection is not terminated in between two
MPLS-TP transport entities
![Page 6: Draft-rkhd-mpls-tp-sd-00 IETF 78 July 2010 Rafi Ram (rafir@orckit.com)rafir@orckit.com Masahiro Daikoku (ms-daikoku@kddi.com)ms-daikoku@kddi.com](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f355503460f94c53bd5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
SD Condition Notification
• A server MEP identifying SD condition should advertise this condition to the MPLS entity handling the protection
• Propose addition of a new fault message type “Link Condition Indication” )LCI(
• The LCI message can have the following impairment flags :)1( Link performance is reduced )i.e. signal degraded()2( Link is congested)3( Link rate is reduced
Note : Using the existing LDI for conveying SD may have the following drawbacks :1. It does not allow the flexibility to report of various impairment conditions2. Need to differentiate between “link down” condition )equivalent to SF( and “link reduced”
)equivalent to SD(, since for APS state machine SF has higher priority than SD
![Page 7: Draft-rkhd-mpls-tp-sd-00 IETF 78 July 2010 Rafi Ram (rafir@orckit.com)rafir@orckit.com Masahiro Daikoku (ms-daikoku@kddi.com)ms-daikoku@kddi.com](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f355503460f94c53bd5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
SD Consideration for Protection Switching
• SD has a lower protection priority than SF-W, but higher than MS
• SD-P and SD-W have similar protection priority :– If SD-P occurs first and then SD-W, there is
no change of state– If SD-W occurs first and then SD-P, there is
no change of state
![Page 8: Draft-rkhd-mpls-tp-sd-00 IETF 78 July 2010 Rafi Ram (rafir@orckit.com)rafir@orckit.com Masahiro Daikoku (ms-daikoku@kddi.com)ms-daikoku@kddi.com](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f355503460f94c53bd5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Next Steps
• Add section of SD BER for various transport technologies and applications
• Address any comments• Republish
![Page 9: Draft-rkhd-mpls-tp-sd-00 IETF 78 July 2010 Rafi Ram (rafir@orckit.com)rafir@orckit.com Masahiro Daikoku (ms-daikoku@kddi.com)ms-daikoku@kddi.com](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f355503460f94c53bd5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Questions ? Comments ?