dr. andres perez - spatial epidemiology of ped virus
DESCRIPTION
Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus - Dr. Andres Perez, University of Minnesota, Associate Professor, Veterinary Population Medicine, from the 2014 Allen D. Leman Swine Conference, September 15-16, 2014, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. More presentations at http://www.swinecast.com/2014-leman-swine-conference-materialTRANSCRIPT
Andres PerezAssociate Professor, CVM, [email protected]
Spatial epidemiology of PED
2014 Allen D. Leman Swine ConferencePre-conference workshop
September 13, 2014St. Paul RiverCentre, St. Paul, Minnesota
Introduction
Coauthors
Julio Alvarez (DVM, PhD) Research Associate, CVM, U of MN
Dane Goede (DVM) Research Assistant, CVM, U of MN
Bob Morrison (DVM, PhD)Professor, CVM, U of MN
Objective and methods
• To assess the spatial dynamics of PED spread in two case-studies (NC and IA)
• Techniques used– Cuzick-Edwards’ test
• Do cases tend to neighbor other cases?
– Knox / Mantel test• Do cases tend to cluster within critical times and distances?
– Directional test• Do cases spread on a given direction?
– Scan statistic• Where and when did clusters occurred?
Results and Conclusions
We will show that:1. There were areas and times at highest risk for
disease and that disease spread on specific directions
2. Cases neighbored other cases (<20thand <4th order of neighborhood in NC and IA, respectively)
3. Clustering was maximum within 1 week, high within 2 weeks, and still significant within 3 weeks.
4. Clustering increased linearly, up to 1 mile, and then remained stable
North Carolina
• Data from most (>70%) farms in 4 counties (>2000)– 59% finishing, 21% nursery, 15% farms with sows
• 614 positive sites (30%) (54.6% lateral)• Report of cases– Start: July-2013– End: Jan-2014
2 months
Location and direction
• Five significant clusters:– “Early stage”– “Dissemination” stage
• Highly significant trend towards NE:33.8°
CE: Order of neighborhood
• NC: cases largely clustered (time not considered)
Knox test (critical time and distance)
Time (d)Space (km)
Pairs of cases
Observed-to-expected ratio
Iowa
• Data from four companies (>400 sites)– 50% finishing, 6% nursery, 42% farms with sows
• Several counties (majority of sites there)• 156 positive sites (37%) (73% lateral)• Cases– Start: May-2013– End: Feb-2014
5 months
• 2 significant clusters– Dissemination stage
• 8 cases in four days (0.64 expected!)
– Late stage
• Highly significant trend towards SE: 322 °
Location and direction
• Cluster at the first levels of neighborhood (k=4)
CE: Order of neighborhood
Knox test (critical time and distance)
Time (d)Space (km)
Observed-to-expected ratio
Pairs of cases
Results and Conclusions
We showed that:1. There were areas and times at highest risk for
disease and that disease spread on specific directions
2. Cases neighbored other cases (<20thand <4th order of neighborhood in NC and IA, respectively)
3. Clustering was maximum within 1 week, high within 2 weeks, and still significant within 3 weeks.
4. Clustering increased linearly, up to 1 mile, and then remained stable
Thank you!Andres Perez Associate Professor
Julio AlvarezResearch Associate
Javier SarradellVisiting Professor
Ana Alba Visiting Researcher
Barbara Brito Research Specialist
Pablo Valdes Research Specialist
Amy KinsleyResearch assistant
Gabe AlGhalithResearch assistant