dr. andres perez - spatial epidemiology of ped virus

15
Andres Perez Associate Professor, CVM, UMN [email protected] Spatial epidemiology of PED 2014 Allen D. Leman Swine Conference Pre-conference workshop September 13, 2014 St. Paul RiverCentre, St. Paul, Minnesota

Upload: john-blue

Post on 05-Dec-2014

152 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus - Dr. Andres Perez, University of Minnesota, Associate Professor, Veterinary Population Medicine, from the 2014 Allen D. Leman Swine Conference, September 15-16, 2014, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. More presentations at http://www.swinecast.com/2014-leman-swine-conference-material

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

Andres PerezAssociate Professor, CVM, [email protected]

Spatial epidemiology of PED

2014 Allen D. Leman Swine ConferencePre-conference workshop

September 13, 2014St. Paul RiverCentre, St. Paul, Minnesota

Page 2: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

Introduction

Page 3: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

Coauthors

Julio Alvarez (DVM, PhD) Research Associate, CVM, U of MN

Dane Goede (DVM) Research Assistant, CVM, U of MN

Bob Morrison (DVM, PhD)Professor, CVM, U of MN

Page 4: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

Objective and methods

• To assess the spatial dynamics of PED spread in two case-studies (NC and IA)

• Techniques used– Cuzick-Edwards’ test

• Do cases tend to neighbor other cases?

– Knox / Mantel test• Do cases tend to cluster within critical times and distances?

– Directional test• Do cases spread on a given direction?

– Scan statistic• Where and when did clusters occurred?

Page 5: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

Results and Conclusions

We will show that:1. There were areas and times at highest risk for

disease and that disease spread on specific directions

2. Cases neighbored other cases (<20thand <4th order of neighborhood in NC and IA, respectively)

3. Clustering was maximum within 1 week, high within 2 weeks, and still significant within 3 weeks.

4. Clustering increased linearly, up to 1 mile, and then remained stable

Page 6: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

North Carolina

• Data from most (>70%) farms in 4 counties (>2000)– 59% finishing, 21% nursery, 15% farms with sows

• 614 positive sites (30%) (54.6% lateral)• Report of cases– Start: July-2013– End: Jan-2014

2 months

Page 7: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

Location and direction

• Five significant clusters:– “Early stage”– “Dissemination” stage

• Highly significant trend towards NE:33.8°

Page 8: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

CE: Order of neighborhood

• NC: cases largely clustered (time not considered)

Page 9: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

Knox test (critical time and distance)

Time (d)Space (km)

Pairs of cases

Observed-to-expected ratio

Page 10: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

Iowa

• Data from four companies (>400 sites)– 50% finishing, 6% nursery, 42% farms with sows

• Several counties (majority of sites there)• 156 positive sites (37%) (73% lateral)• Cases– Start: May-2013– End: Feb-2014

5 months

Page 11: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

• 2 significant clusters– Dissemination stage

• 8 cases in four days (0.64 expected!)

– Late stage

• Highly significant trend towards SE: 322 °

Location and direction

Page 12: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

• Cluster at the first levels of neighborhood (k=4)

CE: Order of neighborhood

Page 13: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

Knox test (critical time and distance)

Time (d)Space (km)

Observed-to-expected ratio

Pairs of cases

Page 14: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

Results and Conclusions

We showed that:1. There were areas and times at highest risk for

disease and that disease spread on specific directions

2. Cases neighbored other cases (<20thand <4th order of neighborhood in NC and IA, respectively)

3. Clustering was maximum within 1 week, high within 2 weeks, and still significant within 3 weeks.

4. Clustering increased linearly, up to 1 mile, and then remained stable

Page 15: Dr. Andres Perez - Spatial Epidemiology of PED Virus

Thank you!Andres Perez Associate Professor

Julio AlvarezResearch Associate

Javier SarradellVisiting Professor

Ana Alba Visiting Researcher

Barbara Brito Research Specialist

Pablo Valdes Research Specialist

Amy KinsleyResearch assistant

Gabe AlGhalithResearch assistant