Green Breakfast
Pohick Creek Watershed Dam Rehabilitation Dredging and Lake Restoration September 14, 2013
Stormwater Management
Pohick Creek PL-566 Facilities Dam Rehabilitation
Dredging and Lake Restoration
PL-566 Facilities Locations
4
Pohick Creek PL-566 Dams The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) designed and
built six dams in the Pohick Creek Watershed between 1970 and 1985, under the authority of Public Law 83-566, the Watershed and Flood Prevention Act
The Northern Virginia Soil and Water Conservation District (NVSWCD) and Fairfax County were the project sponsors
Fairfax County owns and maintains the six facilities
The Pohick dams have helped mitigate downstream flood damages and provide improved water quality, wildlife habitat, recreational opportunities, and economic benefits to the residents of Fairfax County, and are a significant asset to the residents who live near the lakes
PL-566 Dams Auxiliary Spillway Erosion Study • In 1995, partly as a result of the White Oak dam failure, Fairfax County initiated a
spillway erosion study on four of the PL-566 dams (Royal Lake, Woodglen Lake, Lake Barton, and Huntsman Lake)
• The studies indicated remedial measures were required to preclude excessive
headcutting and possible dam failure during the design flow event (PMF)
White Oak Dam in Madison County after June 1995 rainfall event (~18” in 24 hours)
NRCS Technical and Financial Assistance • Fairfax County and NVSWCD as the original project sponsors requested NRCS
assistance to rehabilitate the four PL-566 facilities (starting with Royal Lake) in 2005
• NRCS developed a rehabilitation plan for Royal Lake in 2006, working collaboratively with Fairfax County, NVSWCD, and a citizen’s task force set up by the Braddock District Supervisor’s office
• After adoption of the rehabilitation plan, NRCS asked Fairfax County and NVSWCD to consider taking the lead on the design and construction effort, with NRCS continuing to provide technical and financial assistance
• NRCS also asked Fairfax County and NVSWCD to provide assistance with the Hydrologic and Hydraulic (H&H) studies required to develop rehabilitation plans for the other facilities (Woodglen Lake, Lake Barton and Huntsman Lake)
PL-566 Facility Rehabilitation – Royal Lake
• Challenges – First project – significant learning curve for county
and consultant in understanding and utilizing NRCS design standards and specifications
– Tropical Storm Hanna impacts
PL-566 Facility Rehabilitation – Royal Lake
9
Tropical Storm Hanna (September 6, 2008) Rainfall Amounts in Fairfax County
10
Royal Lake September 7 and 8, 2008
12
Royal Lake ACB installation
Royal Lake Post-Construction
PL-566 Facility Rehabilitation – Woodglen Lake
NRCS received ARRA funding which accelerated the design schedule somewhat
Unsuitable subgrade material encountered at the end of the new auxiliary spillway exit channel resulted in a field design change for the installation of a subsurface drainage system
15
PL-566 Facility Rehabilitation – Woodglen Lake
PL-566 Facility Rehabilitation – Woodglen Lake
PL-566 Facility Rehabilitation – Lake Barton
Preferred concept (ACB armoring) in original NRCS rehabilitation plan was changed at the request of landowners from whom easements were required. A new concept utilizing cutoff walls that resulted in a much smaller tree loss was moved forward
The sediment pool did not meet the minimum 50-year life requirement at the
completion of rehabilitation, and the rehabilitation plan recommended raising the permanent pool elevation by 0.8 feet to achieve the required sediment storage
Because of resident concerns and land rights issues, Fairfax County decided to
dredge Lake Barton to meet the sediment pool capacity requirements NRCS also received ARRA funding for this project which significantly accelerated
the design schedule
18
PL-566 Rehabilitation Projects: Cost-Share Funds Received
• 2007/2008: Royal Lake Dam, $1.8 million • 2009/2010: Woodglen Lake Dam, $1.4 million • 2010/2011: Lake Barton Dam, $2.8 million • 2013: Huntsman Lake, $1.8 million (obligated)
Fairfax County and NVSWCD as project sponsors have received approximately $6 million to date for rehabilitation of the PL-566 facilities:
Huntsman Lake Dam Rehabilitation Project Background
• Huntsman Lake Dam is regulated by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), Division of Dam Safety
• Huntsman Dam is operating under a conditional operation and maintenance (O&M) certificate from DCR because it’s auxiliary spillway can only convey about 50 percent of the flows from the design storm
Huntsman Lake Dam Rehabilitation Project Summary of Rehabilitation Plan
Huntsman Lake Dam Rehabilitation Project Major Design Elements
Huntsman Lake Dam Rehabilitation Project Riser Replacement
Huntsman Lake Dam Rehabilitation Project Fish Relocation (May 2013)
Lake Dredging and Restoration Lake Sediment
(CY)
Sediment Pool
Capacity (CY)
% sediment pool
expended
Annual Load (CY)
Annual Load (CY/AC)
Lake Barton 32,500 75,000 43.33% 1,100 2.04Huntsman Lake 65,000 295,000 22.03% 2,968 2.00Woodglen Lake 32,500 160,000 20.31% 1,244 1.69
Lake Royal 105,000 416,000 25.24% 4,411 1.88Lake Mercer* 37,000 550,000 6.60% 1,650 0.41
Lake Barton Example
Sources of Sediment
Lake Restoration and Dredging Projects
Project Goals • Restore sediment pool capacity
– Downstream water quality benefits – Aesthetics
• Improve lake water quality and habitat • Provide long term maintenance improvements
Dredging Alternatives
1. Mechanically dredge deposited sediment and haul wet
2. Drain lake and dry deposited sediment in place before hauling
Lake Barton Example: Dredging in Progress
Disposal Site – Sediment Reuse
• Topsoil for landfill cover • Topsoil product for resale
Lake Restoration
• In-lake forebay • Wetland planting • Shoreline stabilization • Fish habitat • Fish stocking
Lake Barton: Fish stocking by Virginia Game and Inland Fisheries Fish habitat created from salvaged trees
Shoreline Protection Options
Huntsman Lake Facts
• Drainage area = 1,482 acres (2.3 square miles) • Lake surface area = 28.6 acres • Sediment pool capacity = 295,000 cubic yards (CY) • Current sediment in lake = 65,000 CY • Estimated annual sediment load = 2,970 CY
32.5 feet
65,000 CY
2011
Inactive Dewatering
Basin
Sediment Thickness
Water Depth
Huntsman Lake - Forebays bank stabilization
aquatic bench
forebay
forebay berms
maintenance access
sanitary sewer
dam embankment
Woodglen Lake
Woodglen Lake: Sediment Thickness
Woodglen Lake: Water Depth
Royal Lake Facts
• Lake surface area = 38 acres • Sediment pool capacity =
417,000 cubic yards (CY) • Current sediment in lake =
105,000 CY • Estimated annual sediment load
= 4,400 CY • Phased
– 55,000 base dredge – 50,000 additional
55 feet
105,000 CY
Royal Lake
Royal Lake: Sediment Thickness
Royal Lake: Water Depth
Proposed Schedule
• Huntsman Spillway Rehabilitation and Dredging: Fall 2013
• Woodglen: Winter 2013 • Royal: Summer 2014
Lake Accotink – Fairfax County Park Authority
Lake Accotink Dredge Disposal Site – Concrete Plant
Lake Accotink Dredging Disposal Site at Virginia Concrete
Disposal site during dredging – March 2008 (198,000 cubic yards of dredge material was disposed at this site)
Disposal site 3 months after final site reclamation – July 2009 (Dredging and disposal were completed in 2008. Site reclamation was performed in spring 2009)
Reclaimed Old Concrete Disposal Site
Lake Accotink Dredge Disposal Site
2013
concrete plant
Lake Accotink
2009
Lake Accotink
2010 with lake drained for spillway repairs
Project Contacts
Stormwater Planning Division (703-324-5500) • Matt Meyers • Dipmani Kumar • Martin Chang Partners: