Citizens: System-level
governance through transparency and accountability
SHES researchers
New knowledge and policy advice
S
OTHER
IDSC
Research Africa
DA
TA P
RO
VID
ER
SD
ATA
RE
SO
UR
CE
S
HEMIS OPEN DATA
TABLES
CHET Higher
Education Performance
Indicators
PR
IMA
RY
D
ATA
SO
UR
CE
SS
EC
ON
DA
RY
D
ATA
SO
UR
CE
S
CLOSED DATA OPEN DATA
StatsSAHSRC
NRF
Government
SAQA
DHETP2
CHEGovernment councils and agencies
CRESTDataFirst/UCT
23 public universitiesP1
Public universities
CHETNon-Governmental Organisations
CHEC
African Knowledge
Base
HIV Prevalence
Survey
Higher Education Data Analyser
International state-funded donor agenciesDFID, USAID, Danida, IDRC, Sida, etc.
CHEC Web-site
RCBF
Graduate Pathways
Survey
Elsevier
Scopus
Web of Science
Thomson Reuters
Google Scholar
Bibliographic Indexes
HSRC Data Site
QS Quacquarelli Symonds
TSL Education
ShanghaiRanking Consultancy Cybermetrics Lab (CSIC, Spain)
Supranational agenciesUN, World Bank, Unesco, OECD
Philanthropic organisationsGates Foundation, Ford, Carnegie, Melon, etc.
THE Rankings
ShanghaiRankings
QSRankings
Webometrics
Nobel Prize Winners
CHET Knowledge Production
Dataset
CHET Dataset on
Differentiation
Labour Market Intel-ligence Partnership
Database
LMIP Data Repository
C3
C2
C1
University research units
Feedbackloops
Data � ow(supply)
Data � ow(use) Users
HEMISDatabase
HE plannersUniversity-level governance
through evidence-based decision-making
P
PrimaryP SecondaryS
PRIVATE SECTOR PUBLIC SECTORPUBLIC SECTOR
Institutional boundaries
R Regulatory conditions
ICTInformation and communication technologies
Enabling/inhibitingconditions
ICT
R
LEG
ISLA
TIO
NN
atio
nal Q
uali�
cat
ions
Fra
mew
ork
Act
67
of 2
008
Publ
ic S
ervi
ce R
egul
atio
ns A
ct o
f 200
1Pr
omot
ion
of A
cces
s to
Info
rmat
ion
Act
2 o
f 200
0Pu
blic
Fin
ance
Man
agem
ent A
ct 1
of 1
999
Stat
e of
Info
rmat
ion
Tech
nolo
gy A
genc
y A
ct 1
998
Skill
s Dev
elop
men
t Act
97
of 1
998
Empl
oym
ent E
quity
Act
55
of 1
998
LEG
ISLA
TIO
NH
ighe
r Edu
catio
n A
ct 1
01 o
f 199
7Ba
sic C
ondi
tions
of E
mpl
oym
ent A
ct 1
997
Nat
iona
l Edu
catio
n Po
licy
Act
27
of 1
996
Sout
h A
fric
an Q
uali�
cat
ions
Aut
horit
y A
ct 5
8 of
199
5Pu
blic
Ser
vice
Act
of 1
994
Cop
yrig
ht A
ct 9
8 of
197
8
STA
ND
ARD
S / A
GRE
EMEN
TSM
inist
eria
l Int
erop
erab
ility
Sta
ndar
ds fo
r Inf
orm
atio
n Sy
stem
s in
Gov
-er
nmen
t v4.
1 20
07Po
st-s
choo
l Edu
catio
n an
d Tr
aini
ng G
reen
Pap
er 2
012
Hig
her E
duca
tion
Whi
te P
aper
201
3St
atist
ics S
outh
Afr
ica
Stat
istic
al Q
ualit
y A
sses
smen
t Fra
mew
ork
Ope
n G
over
nmen
t Par
tner
ship
Req
uire
men
ts
Open Data in the Governance of South African Higher Education
Primary research questionWhat is the level of use and possible impact of open data in the governance of South African higher education?
Secondary research questionWhat is the role of intermediaries in the supply and use of open data in the governance of South African higher education?
Background
The Centre for Higher Education Transformation (CHET) is a non-governmental organisation that conducts research on African universtities at both institutional and systemic levels.
CHET’s research focuses on issues of university governance, performance indicators, differentiation, knowledge production and the links between higher education and development.
The Department for Higher Education and Training (DHET) is the South African government department responsible for funding and steering the post-school system, including the country’s public universities.
Universities are governed by their councils. Councils are advised on university performance by the university executive and the university’s institutional planning unit.
Method
Case study CHET Open Data Platform www.chet.org.za/sahe-open-data/
Data collection Semi-structured interviews with data users [university planners (7) + HES researchers (6)] and the primary data provider [DHET]
capacity-constrained government departments. This could strengthen the impact of open data on the governance of South African public universities. Recommendation: Initiate discussions between DHET and other stakeholders on how to share HEMIS data or to improve the data tables currently made available online.
3 There are concerns at both government and university levels about how data will be used and (mis)interpreted, and this may constrain
future data supply. Recommendation: Improve data literacy, particularly among journalists.
4 Open data intermediaries increase the accessibility and utility of data. While there is a rich publicly-funded dataset on South
African higher education, the data remains largely inaccessible or unusable to universities and researchers in HES. Despite these constraints, the ODDC research shows that intermediaries in the ecosystem are playing a valuable role in
making the data both available and useable.
5 Open data intermediaries provide both supply-side as well as demand-side value. CHET’s work on HE performance
indicators was intended not only to contribute to government’s steering mechanisms, but also to contribute to the governance capacity of South African universities. The ODDC research supports CHET’s ambition to build institutional-level capacity. Further research is required to confirm the use of CHET data in state-steering of the South African higher education system, although there is some evidence of CHET’s data being referenced in national policy documents.
6 Intermediaries may assume the role of a ‘keystone species’ in a data ecosystem.The ODDC research shows that inter-
mediaries such as CHET play an enabling role of mediation and innovation within the ecosystem. CHET enables new connections and solutions
within the ecosystem. CHET is also located outside of the two primary institutions – the state and the university – thus enabling it to play a mediating role.
7 Intermediaries democratise the effects and use of open data. Intermediaries play an important role in curtailing the ‘de-
ameliorating’ effects of disciplinary surveillance on open data. Intermediaries, as actors who may well operate outside of the boundaries of the state apparatus and of the institution of the university, have the propensity to challenge how data is collected, interpreted and shared. Their role as de-institutionalised actors could contribute to restoring the democratic value of open data. The ODDC research shows that CHET is already playing a unique role to ensure open data justice as it challenges existing, imposed norms in the collection and use of open data in the governance of South Africa’s public university system.
o The HE governance open data ecosystem has evolved despite poor data provision by government because of the presence of intermediaries in the ecosystem.
o By providing a richer information context and/or by making the data interoperable, government could improve the uptake of data by new users and intermediaries, as well as by the existing intermediaries.
o Increasing the fluidity of government open data could remove uncertainties around both the degree of access provided by intermediaries and the financial sustainability of the open platforms provided by intermediaries.
Data users University planners (institutional-level policy) Governance mechanism: university councils
Higher education studies (HES) researchers (national policy) Governance mechanism: research—policy nexus
Primary data providerGovernment (Department for Higher Education and Training)
Primary data source Higher Education Management Information System (HEMIS)
Findings
1 CHET’s open data is being used by university planners and HES researchers, albeit infrequently. Researchers expressed the need for richer data. Recommendation: CHET should take note of these findings when planning
any modifications to its open data platform; it may need to carve a more differentiated role for itself based the needs of different user groups and given the presence of other intermediaries in the open data ecosystem.
2HEMIS is an isolated data source. Granting access to HEMIS by third-parties (under controlled conditions to protect personal data) could further stimulate the evolution of the open data ecosystem and relieve pressure on
Conclusions
The
fund
ing
for
this
wor
k ha
s be
en p
rovi
ded
thro
ugh
the
Wor
ld W
ide
Web
Fou
ndat
ion
'Exp
lori
ng th
e Em
ergi
ng Im
pact
s of
Ope
n D
ata
in D
evel
opin
g C
ount
ries
' res
earc
h pr
ojec
t, su
ppor
ted
by g
rant
10
7075
from
Can
ada’
s In
tern
atio
nal D
evel
opm
ent R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
(web
.idrc
.ca)
. Fin
d ou
t mor
e at
ww
w.o
pend
atar
esea
rch.
org/
emer
ging
impa
cts
OPEN DATA in the Governance of South African Higher Education
The
Sou
th A
fric
an h
ighe
r ed
ucat
ion
gove
rnan
ce o
pen
data
eco
syst
em
40% tint
K = 80%
R G B5151
102
1535151
15320451
51102153
François van Schalkwyk ([email protected]), Michelle Willmers ([email protected]) & Laura Czerniewicz ([email protected])
