open data in the governance of south african higher education€¦ · in the governance of south...

1
Citizens: System-level governance through transparency and accountability S HES researchers New knowledge and policy advice S OTHER IDSC Research Africa DATA PROVIDERS DATA RESOURCES HEMIS OPEN DATA TABLES CHET Higher Education Performance Indicators PRIMARY DATA SOURCES SECONDARY DATA SOURCES CLOSED DATA OPEN DATA StatsSA HSRC NRF G o v e rn m e n t SAQA DHET P 2 CHE G o v e r n m e nt c o u n cils a n d a g e n c i e s CREST DataFirst/UCT 23 public universities P 1 P u blic u n iv e rs itie s CHET N o n - G o vern m e n ta l O rg a nis a tio n s CHEC African Knowledge Base HIV Prevalence Survey Higher Education Data Analyser International state-funded donor agencies DFID, USAID, Danida, IDRC, Sida, etc. CHEC Web- site RCBF Graduate Pathways Survey Elsevier Scopus Web of Science Thomson Reuters Google Google Scholar Bibliographic Indexes HSRC Data Site QS Quacquarelli Symonds TSL Education ShanghaiRanking Consultancy Cybermetrics Lab (CSIC, Spain) Supranational agencies UN, World Bank, Unesco, OECD Philanthropic organisations Gates Foundation, Ford, Carnegie, Melon, etc. THE Rankings Shanghai Rankings QS Rankings Webometrics Nobel Prize Winners CHET Knowledge Production Dataset CHET Dataset on Differentiation Labour Market Intel- ligence Partnership Database LMIP Data Repository C 3 C 2 C 1 University research units Feedback loops Data flow (supply) Data flow (use) Users HEMIS Database HE planners University-level governance through evidence-based decision-making P Primary P Secondary S PRIVATE SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR L Institutional boundaries R Regulatory conditions ICT Information and communication technologies Enabling/ inhibiting conditions ICT R LEGISLATION National Qualifications Framework Act 67 of 2008 Public Service Regulations Act of 2001 Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000 Public Finance Management Act 1 of 1999 State of Information Technology Agency Act 1998 Skills Development Act 97 of 1998 Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 LEGISLATION Higher Education Act 101 of 1997 Basic Conditions of Employment Act 1997 National Education Policy Act 27 of 1996 South African Qualifications Authority Act 58 of 1995 Public Service Act of 1994 Copyright Act 98 of 1978 STANDARDS / AGREEMENTS Ministerial Interoperability Standards for Information Systems in Gov- ernment v4.1 2007 Post-school Education and Training Green Paper 2012 Higher Education White Paper 2013 Statistics South Africa Statistical Quality Assessment Framework Open Government Partnership Requirements Open Data in the Governance of South African Higher Education Primary research question What is the level of use and possible impact of open data in the governance of South African higher education? Secondary research question What is the role of intermediaries in the supply and use of open data in the governance of South African higher education? Background The Centre for Higher Education Transformation (CHET) is a non-governmental organisation that conducts research on African universtities at both institutional and systemic levels. CHET’s research focuses on issues of university governance, performance indicators, differentiation, knowledge production and the links between higher education and development. The Department for Higher Education and Training (DHET) is the South African government department responsible for funding and steering the post-school system, including the country’s public universities. Universities are governed by their councils. Councils are advised on university performance by the university executive and the university’s institutional planning unit. Method Case study CHET Open Data Platform www.chet.org.za/sahe-open-data/ Data collection Semi-structured interviews with data users [university planners (7) + HES researchers (6)] and the primary data provider [DHET] capacity-constrained government departments. This could strengthen the impact of open data on the governance of South African public universities. Recommendation: Initiate discussions between DHET and other stakeholders on how to share HEMIS data or to improve the data tables currently made available online. 3 There are concerns at both government and university levels about how data will be used and (mis)interpreted, and this may constrain future data supply. Recommendation: Improve data literacy, particularly among journalists. 4 Open data intermediaries increase the accessibility and utility of data. While there is a rich publicly-funded dataset on South African higher education, the data remains largely inaccessible or unusable to universities and researchers in HES. Despite these constraints, the ODDC research shows that intermediaries in the ecosystem are playing a valuable role in making the data both available and useable. 5 Open data intermediaries provide both supply-side as well as demand-side value. CHET’s work on HE performance indicators was intended not only to contribute to government’s steering mechanisms, but also to contribute to the governance capacity of South African universities. The ODDC research supports CHET’s ambition to build institutional-level capacity. Further research is required to confirm the use of CHET data in state-steering of the South African higher education system, although there is some evidence of CHET’s data being referenced in national policy documents. 6 Intermediaries may assume the role of a ‘keystone species’ in a data ecosystem. The ODDC research shows that inter- mediaries such as CHET play an enabling role of mediation and innovation within the ecosystem. CHET enables new connections and solutions within the ecosystem. CHET is also located outside of the two primary institutions – the state and the university – thus enabling it to play a mediating role. 7 Intermediaries democratise the effects and use of open data. Intermediaries play an important role in curtailing the ‘de- ameliorating’ effects of disciplinary surveillance on open data. Intermediaries, as actors who may well operate outside of the boundaries of the state apparatus and of the institution of the university, have the propensity to challenge how data is collected, interpreted and shared. Their role as de-institutionalised actors could contribute to restoring the democratic value of open data. The ODDC research shows that CHET is already playing a unique role to ensure open data justice as it challenges existing, imposed norms in the collection and use of open data in the governance of South Africa’s public university system. o The HE governance open data ecosystem has evolved despite poor data provision by government because of the presence of intermediaries in the ecosystem. o By providing a richer information context and/or by making the data interoperable, government could improve the uptake of data by new users and intermediaries, as well as by the existing intermediaries. o Increasing the fluidity of government open data could remove uncertainties around both the degree of access provided by intermediaries and the financial sustainability of the open platforms provided by intermediaries. Data users University planners (institutional-level policy) Governance mechanism: university councils Higher education studies (HES) researchers (national policy) Governance mechanism: research—policy nexus Primary data provider Government (Department for Higher Education and Training) Primary data source Higher Education Management Information System (HEMIS) Findings 1 CHET’s open data is being used by university planners and HES researchers, albeit infrequently. Researchers expressed the need for richer data. Recommendation: CHET should take note of these findings when planning any modifications to its open data platform; it may need to carve a more differentiated role for itself based the needs of different user groups and given the presence of other intermediaries in the open data ecosystem. 2 HEMIS is an isolated data source. Granting access to HEMIS by third- parties (under controlled conditions to protect personal data) could further stimulate the evolution of the open data ecosystem and relieve pressure on Conclusions The funding for this work has been provided through the World Wide Web Foundation 'Exploring the Emerging Impacts of Open Data in Developing Countries' research project, supported by grant 107075 from Canada’s International Development Research Centre (web.idrc.ca). Find out more at www.opendataresearch.org/emergingimpacts OPEN DATA in the Governance of South African Higher Education The South African higher education governance open data ecosystem François van Schalkwyk ([email protected]), Michelle Willmers ([email protected]) & Laura Czerniewicz ([email protected])

Upload: others

Post on 30-Apr-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Open data in the governance of South African Higher Education€¦ · in the Governance of South African Higher Education The South African higher education governance open data ecosystem

Citizens: System-level

governance through transparency and accountability

SHES researchers

New knowledge and policy advice

S

OTHER

IDSC

Research Africa

DA

TA P

RO

VID

ER

SD

ATA

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

HEMIS OPEN DATA

TABLES

CHET Higher

Education Performance

Indicators

PR

IMA

RY

D

ATA

SO

UR

CE

SS

EC

ON

DA

RY

D

ATA

SO

UR

CE

S

CLOSED DATA OPEN DATA

StatsSAHSRC

NRF

Government

SAQA

DHETP2

CHEGovernment councils and agencies

CRESTDataFirst/UCT

23 public universitiesP1

Public universities

CHETNon-Governmental Organisations

CHEC

African Knowledge

Base

HIV Prevalence

Survey

Higher Education Data Analyser

International state-funded donor agenciesDFID, USAID, Danida, IDRC, Sida, etc.

CHEC Web-site

RCBF

Graduate Pathways

Survey

Elsevier

Scopus

Web of Science

Thomson Reuters

Google

Google Scholar

Bibliographic Indexes

HSRC Data Site

QS Quacquarelli Symonds

TSL Education

ShanghaiRanking Consultancy Cybermetrics Lab (CSIC, Spain)

Supranational agenciesUN, World Bank, Unesco, OECD

Philanthropic organisationsGates Foundation, Ford, Carnegie, Melon, etc.

THE Rankings

ShanghaiRankings

QSRankings

Webometrics

Nobel Prize Winners

CHET Knowledge Production

Dataset

CHET Dataset on

Differentiation

Labour Market Intel-ligence Partnership

Database

LMIP Data Repository

C3

C2

C1

University research units

Feedbackloops

Data � ow(supply)

Data � ow(use) Users

HEMISDatabase

HE plannersUniversity-level governance

through evidence-based decision-making

P

PrimaryP SecondaryS

PRIVATE SECTOR PUBLIC SECTORPUBLIC SECTOR

Institutional boundaries

R Regulatory conditions

ICTInformation and communication technologies

Enabling/inhibitingconditions

ICT

R

LEG

ISLA

TIO

NN

atio

nal Q

uali�

cat

ions

Fra

mew

ork

Act

67

of 2

008

Publ

ic S

ervi

ce R

egul

atio

ns A

ct o

f 200

1Pr

omot

ion

of A

cces

s to

Info

rmat

ion

Act

2 o

f 200

0Pu

blic

Fin

ance

Man

agem

ent A

ct 1

of 1

999

Stat

e of

Info

rmat

ion

Tech

nolo

gy A

genc

y A

ct 1

998

Skill

s Dev

elop

men

t Act

97

of 1

998

Empl

oym

ent E

quity

Act

55

of 1

998

LEG

ISLA

TIO

NH

ighe

r Edu

catio

n A

ct 1

01 o

f 199

7Ba

sic C

ondi

tions

of E

mpl

oym

ent A

ct 1

997

Nat

iona

l Edu

catio

n Po

licy

Act

27

of 1

996

Sout

h A

fric

an Q

uali�

cat

ions

Aut

horit

y A

ct 5

8 of

199

5Pu

blic

Ser

vice

Act

of 1

994

Cop

yrig

ht A

ct 9

8 of

197

8

STA

ND

ARD

S / A

GRE

EMEN

TSM

inist

eria

l Int

erop

erab

ility

Sta

ndar

ds fo

r Inf

orm

atio

n Sy

stem

s in

Gov

-er

nmen

t v4.

1 20

07Po

st-s

choo

l Edu

catio

n an

d Tr

aini

ng G

reen

Pap

er 2

012

Hig

her E

duca

tion

Whi

te P

aper

201

3St

atist

ics S

outh

Afr

ica

Stat

istic

al Q

ualit

y A

sses

smen

t Fra

mew

ork

Ope

n G

over

nmen

t Par

tner

ship

Req

uire

men

ts

Open Data in the Governance of South African Higher Education

Primary research questionWhat is the level of use and possible impact of open data in the governance of South African higher education?

Secondary research questionWhat is the role of intermediaries in the supply and use of open data in the governance of South African higher education?

Background

The Centre for Higher Education Transformation (CHET) is a non-governmental organisation that conducts research on African universtities at both institutional and systemic levels.

CHET’s research focuses on issues of university governance, performance indicators, differentiation, knowledge production and the links between higher education and development.

The Department for Higher Education and Training (DHET) is the South African government department responsible for funding and steering the post-school system, including the country’s public universities.

Universities are governed by their councils. Councils are advised on university performance by the university executive and the university’s institutional planning unit.

Method

Case study CHET Open Data Platform www.chet.org.za/sahe-open-data/

Data collection Semi-structured interviews with data users [university planners (7) + HES researchers (6)] and the primary data provider [DHET]

capacity-constrained government departments. This could strengthen the impact of open data on the governance of South African public universities. Recommendation: Initiate discussions between DHET and other stakeholders on how to share HEMIS data or to improve the data tables currently made available online.

3 There are concerns at both government and university levels about how data will be used and (mis)interpreted, and this may constrain

future data supply. Recommendation: Improve data literacy, particularly among journalists.

4 Open data intermediaries increase the accessibility and utility of data. While there is a rich publicly-funded dataset on South

African higher education, the data remains largely inaccessible or unusable to universities and researchers in HES. Despite these constraints, the ODDC research shows that intermediaries in the ecosystem are playing a valuable role in

making the data both available and useable.

5 Open data intermediaries provide both supply-side as well as demand-side value. CHET’s work on HE performance

indicators was intended not only to contribute to government’s steering mechanisms, but also to contribute to the governance capacity of South African universities. The ODDC research supports CHET’s ambition to build institutional-level capacity. Further research is required to confirm the use of CHET data in state-steering of the South African higher education system, although there is some evidence of CHET’s data being referenced in national policy documents.

6 Intermediaries may assume the role of a ‘keystone species’ in a data ecosystem.The ODDC research shows that inter-

mediaries such as CHET play an enabling role of mediation and innovation within the ecosystem. CHET enables new connections and solutions

within the ecosystem. CHET is also located outside of the two primary institutions – the state and the university – thus enabling it to play a mediating role.

7 Intermediaries democratise the effects and use of open data. Intermediaries play an important role in curtailing the ‘de-

ameliorating’ effects of disciplinary surveillance on open data. Intermediaries, as actors who may well operate outside of the boundaries of the state apparatus and of the institution of the university, have the propensity to challenge how data is collected, interpreted and shared. Their role as de-institutionalised actors could contribute to restoring the democratic value of open data. The ODDC research shows that CHET is already playing a unique role to ensure open data justice as it challenges existing, imposed norms in the collection and use of open data in the governance of South Africa’s public university system.

o The HE governance open data ecosystem has evolved despite poor data provision by government because of the presence of intermediaries in the ecosystem.

o By providing a richer information context and/or by making the data interoperable, government could improve the uptake of data by new users and intermediaries, as well as by the existing intermediaries.

o Increasing the fluidity of government open data could remove uncertainties around both the degree of access provided by intermediaries and the financial sustainability of the open platforms provided by intermediaries.

Data users University planners (institutional-level policy) Governance mechanism: university councils

Higher education studies (HES) researchers (national policy) Governance mechanism: research—policy nexus

Primary data providerGovernment (Department for Higher Education and Training)

Primary data source Higher Education Management Information System (HEMIS)

Findings

1 CHET’s open data is being used by university planners and HES researchers, albeit infrequently. Researchers expressed the need for richer data. Recommendation: CHET should take note of these findings when planning

any modifications to its open data platform; it may need to carve a more differentiated role for itself based the needs of different user groups and given the presence of other intermediaries in the open data ecosystem.

2HEMIS is an isolated data source. Granting access to HEMIS by third-parties (under controlled conditions to protect personal data) could further stimulate the evolution of the open data ecosystem and relieve pressure on

Conclusions

The

fund

ing

for

this

wor

k ha

s be

en p

rovi

ded

thro

ugh

the

Wor

ld W

ide

Web

Fou

ndat

ion

'Exp

lori

ng th

e Em

ergi

ng Im

pact

s of

Ope

n D

ata

in D

evel

opin

g C

ount

ries

' res

earc

h pr

ojec

t, su

ppor

ted

by g

rant

10

7075

from

Can

ada’

s In

tern

atio

nal D

evel

opm

ent R

esea

rch

Cen

tre

(web

.idrc

.ca)

. Fin

d ou

t mor

e at

ww

w.o

pend

atar

esea

rch.

org/

emer

ging

impa

cts

OPEN DATA in the Governance of South African Higher Education

The

Sou

th A

fric

an h

ighe

r ed

ucat

ion

gove

rnan

ce o

pen

data

eco

syst

em

40% tint

K = 80%

R G B5151

102

1535151

15320451

51102153

François van Schalkwyk ([email protected]), Michelle Willmers ([email protected]) & Laura Czerniewicz ([email protected])