![Page 1: Municipal Networks: Competitive? Or Complementary? Brenda van Gelder Director, Virginia Tech eCorridors April 18, 2005](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfd51a28abf838cad787/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Municipal Networks: Competitive? Or Complementary?
Brenda van Gelder
Director, Virginia Tech eCorridors
April 18, 2005
![Page 2: Municipal Networks: Competitive? Or Complementary? Brenda van Gelder Director, Virginia Tech eCorridors April 18, 2005](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfd51a28abf838cad787/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Competitive?
com·pet·i·tive
1. Of, involving, or determined by competition: competitive games.
2. Liking competition or inclined to compete: a highly competitive teammate.
1. “Due to their much larger size, experience, and economies of scale, commercial competitors are able to offer better content and lower prices than municipalities.”-- Joseph L. Bast, President of the Heartland Institute
2. Most municipal telecom efforts consider themselves “the provider of last resort,” and are undertaken only after all possible alternatives have been exhausted
![Page 3: Municipal Networks: Competitive? Or Complementary? Brenda van Gelder Director, Virginia Tech eCorridors April 18, 2005](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfd51a28abf838cad787/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Complementary?
com·ple·men·ta·ry
• Forming or serving as a complement; completing.
• Supplying mutual needs or offsetting mutual lacks.
![Page 4: Municipal Networks: Competitive? Or Complementary? Brenda van Gelder Director, Virginia Tech eCorridors April 18, 2005](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfd51a28abf838cad787/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Ways in Which Municipal Networks are Complementary• Objectives• Markets• Perspectives• Technology• Assets/Expertise• Long term Strategies
![Page 5: Municipal Networks: Competitive? Or Complementary? Brenda van Gelder Director, Virginia Tech eCorridors April 18, 2005](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfd51a28abf838cad787/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Objectives
• Private– return on investment
– market penetration
– critical mass
• Municipal – economic development
– education and quality of life for local citizens
– survival
![Page 6: Municipal Networks: Competitive? Or Complementary? Brenda van Gelder Director, Virginia Tech eCorridors April 18, 2005](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfd51a28abf838cad787/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Markets
• Private – Urban
– high density population areas
– “cherry picking”
• Municipal – tend to occur in rural and isolated communities
– “low return-on-investment areas”
![Page 7: Municipal Networks: Competitive? Or Complementary? Brenda van Gelder Director, Virginia Tech eCorridors April 18, 2005](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfd51a28abf838cad787/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Perspectives
• The dominant private sector providers tend to view the network as a distribution network with a few centralized producers and many consumers (broadcast model)
• Consistent with their economic development objectives, municipal networks strive to provide access to capacity that would allow any citizen and any business to become a point of production and therefore tend to view the network as a “producer network”
![Page 8: Municipal Networks: Competitive? Or Complementary? Brenda van Gelder Director, Virginia Tech eCorridors April 18, 2005](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfd51a28abf838cad787/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Technologies• Private
– the primary technologies comprising the dominant providers’ offerings are copper wire and cable modems
– These technologies typically provide low speed from the consumer to the network hub and moderate speeds from the network to the consumer
– tentative efforts are beginning with wireless and FTTH technologies but are currently limited to urban markets
• Municipal – Are using emerging technologies including wireless, Broadband
over Powerlines, and optical fiber – Experimentation with bi-directional multi-megabit per second
wireless and with gigabits per second capacity to the home and small business
![Page 9: Municipal Networks: Competitive? Or Complementary? Brenda van Gelder Director, Virginia Tech eCorridors April 18, 2005](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfd51a28abf838cad787/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Assets/Expertise
• Private – significant experience in deploying infrastructure; ownership of
infrastructure with sunk costs recovered many times over; regulatory stability and lobbying; Universal Service subsidies; monopoly status
• Municipal – significant experience in providing public infrastructure service
such as power, sewer, water; ownership of ROW; ability to do expeditionary marketing in untapped market segments; efficiencies in deploying infrastructure in conjunction with municipal construction requiring little to no incremental expense; access to small amounts of grant funding for rural “digital divide” projects
![Page 10: Municipal Networks: Competitive? Or Complementary? Brenda van Gelder Director, Virginia Tech eCorridors April 18, 2005](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfd51a28abf838cad787/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Long Term Strategies
• Private – maximize investments in existing infrastructure, minimize
risk
• Municipal – World Domination