1
IW
R M
PACIFIC
GEF Pacific IWRM Demonstration Project
Integrated Water and Land Management for the Sustainable Use
of the Laura Water Lens
Final ReportMajuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands
June 2014
Marshall
Islands
An Initiative of the Global Environment Facility Supported Project:“Implementing Sustainable Water Resources and Wastewater Management in Pacific Island Countries”
GEF Pacific IWRM Project
2
Contents
Preface 3
1. Water and Sanitation iSSueS in the develoPment of the rmi Gef Pacific iWrm national demonStration Project
4
2. manaGement of the Gef Pacific iWrm national demonStration Project in rmi
6
3. eStabliShment of a coordinatinG body for the oPeration of the Gef Pacific iWrm demonStration Project in rmi
8
4. PlanninG Stakeholder ParticiPation in the execution of the rmi Gef Pacific iWrm demonStration Project
10
5. reSultS oriented PlanninG and imPlementation of the Gef Pacific iWrm demonStration Project in rmi
12
5.1 logframe development
5.2 Priority areas of Work and results
5.3 catalytic impacts 16
5.4 Participatory Planning, monitoring and evaluation
6. StrenGtheninG national coordination and iWrm Policy and PlanninG in rmi
17
6.1 linkages of demonstration activities with iWrm Planning
6.2 national iWrm Planning
7. caPturinG leSSonS learned for rePlication and ScalinG-uP of iWrm beSt Practice in rmi
18
7.1 lessons learned
7.2 replication and Scaling up
8. PlanninG the tranSition from iWrm to the reGional ridGe to reef initiative
19
8.1 Scaling-up to broader integrated land, Water and coastal management
annexeS 20
3
PrefaCe
the phrase “water is life” is an understatement in the republic of the marshall islands (rmi), where there is a chronic shortage of water and the population is at high risk of disease due to poor sanitation. the strong connections between water and sanitation and the health and quality life, combined with the risks associated with climate change, make effective water resource management one of the highest priorities in rmi. all of rmi’s 26 coral atolls and 5 islands are low lying, with extremely limited freshwater resources, difficult sanitation challenges, and vulnerability to extreme weather events and natural disasters. at least 74% of the population now lives in the two urban centers of majuro and ebeye, and this brings with it additional challenges.
improved water supply coverage is high, at least 97%, yet limited water availability, contamination, and drought all present high risks to the people of the marshall islands. the primary source of freshwater is rain, which is mostly harvested via rainwater catchments, and which also acts to recharge several groundwater lenses which are found in some favorable locations. on majuro atoll, the water system is more than 75% rainwater collection with the remainder coming from the laura groundwater lens. on ebeye, the water supply system is based solely on desalinization through expensive reverse osmosis filters. Water quality testing conducted by the rmi ePa show that the majority of household catchments, in both urban and rural settings, are contaminated.
at least seven severe droughts were recorded in the last half century, with majuro receiving less than 35 inches of rainfall over 7 months during these droughts. it is anticipated that should current climate predictions play out, gradual sea level rise and more frequent and severe droughts will exacerbate the high natural variability in freshwater availability in rmi. Progressively more urban households are installing private rainwater catchments, with more than 64% on majuro and 37% on ebeye. it is estimated that 49% of all households in the rmi have less than 4 days of freshwater storage.
Sanitation severely lags behind water with only 70% improved coverage, 82% in urban areas and 53% in rural areas. despite a law mandating the use of toilets many households are still without improved toilets, with 35% of the population in rural areas and 3.6% in urban still defecating in the open. additionally both urban sewer systems on majuro and ebeye dispose raw sewage directly into open water adjacent to populated areas severely impacting the environment and health. this trend is especially concerning in dense urban areas and in areas above freshwater groundwater lenses where there is contamination of critical resources and high potential for disease outbreaks.
on 22 and 23 march 2011, a national Water Summit convened in majuro highlighted the key sector issues and confirmed the urgency of water and sanitation improvements. in particular it was agreed that while there are a number of official policies, laws, regulations, plans and agreements that articulate rmi’s intentions and standards with respect water and sanitation, they have been developed over several decades in a relatively uncoordinated fashion. in march of 2014 a national Water and Sanitation Policy was endorsed that brings together and addresses these concerns.
the national and Water and Sanitation Policy articulates the rmi’s overarching vision for water and sanitation which is: “to provide all marshallese citizens access to clean and adequate water supplies and a level of hygiene and sanitation comparable to world standards”.
mr. jorelik tibon
chairman of the laura integrated Water and land management advisory Group
4
1. Water and sanitation Issues in the Development of the rMI Gef Pacific IWrM national Demonstration Project
in 2007 the rmi completed a diagnostic iWrm analysis. the diagnosis provided a detailed assessment of important water and sanitation issues in the country and aimed to: help the rmi develop a sustainable integrated water resource management system; help ensure that water resources used effectively for wellbeing and development; and help safeguard water resources for future generations.
the ten key findings of the diagnosis are as follows:
1. overall, water resource management in the rmi is more non-integrated than it is integrated;
2. While there is some cooperation among water related agencies, overall collective management remains weak;
3. all organisations with direct and indirect responsibilities for water and sanitation management and the network that connects them need capacity development and strengthening;
4. the absence of a formally established and authorized national water apex body and lack of a clear and credible water and sanitation policy result in a relatively unclear future for the water and sanitation sector;
5. majuro, ebeye and the outer islands face both water quantity and quality challenges;
6. the two main water utilities continue to face severe financial and operational challenges which affect the effectiveness and quality of their services;
7. conservation and demand management remain weak;
8. Water resources assessment and monitoring remains limited, although this is improving;
9. the rmi faces increasing vulnerability from floods and other natural and man-made disasters and yet its disaster preparedness capacity remains fundamentally weak;
10. iWrm is common sense, but it is not commonly practiced in the rmi and there is much room for improvement across the board.
as part of the 2007 diagnosis, the rmi also conducted a hot Spot analysis (hSa) exercise to identify and evaluate areas of national, regional or global significance and where conditions adversely affect human health, threaten ecosystem functioning, reduce biodiversity and/or compromise resources and amenities of economic importance in a manner that would appear to warrant priority management attention. in addition to hot spots, a number of sensitive areas were also identified and evaluated. these sensitive areas are areas of national regional and/or global significance which, although not degraded at present, are threatened with future degradation.
5
the hSa considered nine hot spots and sensitive areas. these were of different types: thematic, geographic, institutional, and policy/legislation. after conducting its evaluation and rating of each of these, using the prescribed hSa methodology, laura village’s fresh water lens was selected as the most suitable hot spot for a Global environment facility supported national iWrm demonstration Project. located on the western tip of majuro atoll, laura village is the third largest population center in the rmi the groundwater lens at laura is increasingly relied upon by the greater population of majuro and yet it faces mounting threats, and it offers an ideal microcosm and laboratory for an iWrm demonstration project in that it integrates a number of water and wastewater issues, socio-economic factors, and other considerations. laura was also selected based on the fact that success in this endeavour is directly applicable for replication in other areas in the rmi. a case study on the laura area and factors influencing the management of the laura water lens has been prepared and is available in hard copy and electronic format at the office of rmiePa.
the laura water lens is a critical resource in that it supplies a significant portion of fresh water for the majuro population, and yet it faces multiple threats and has not been managed very effectively or sustainably over the years. it is therefore imperative and critical that steps be taken to introduce more sustainable use of water lens – this is the main objective of rmi’s Gef supported iWrm national demonstration Project.
the project is entitled “integrated Water and land management for the Sustainable use of the laura Water lens” and is commonly referred to nationally as the “laura lens Project”. in summary, the key demonstration
project components of are:
1: Strengthened coordination for integrated land and Water management at laura
2: identification of key threats and management issues for the Water lens
3: development of a laura integrated Water and land resources management Plan
4: targeted Stress reduction demonstrations for the Water lens, including:
4.1: reducing Stress from overloaded and leaking Septic Systems
4.2: reducing Stress from domestic Solid Waste leachate Pollution
4.3: building capacity of Pig farmers to reduce Stress on the Water lens
5: enhancing awareness and understanding of the Water lens, including:
5.1: Public awareness
5.2: training and education
6: iWrm Policy and Plan development
6
Overview of the Lead Agency, IWRM Focal Point, and Project Management Unit
the rmi environmental Protection authority (rmiePa) is the lead agency for both the Pacific iWrm Program in the marshall islands. the authority’s executive function is headed by the General manager, mr. lowell alik who provides overall leadership in administering the affairs of the authority. the General manager facilitates cooperative efforts with other ministries/agencies and supplies the board with policy advice and assistance with cabinet-level concerns. the General manager is assisted by a deputy General manager in directing the areas of Policy and Planning, in order to improve the delivery of services nationally and within communities. the authority strives to be innovative in strengthening its capacity to provide more effective leadership. the organizational chart is provided below in figure 1, and illustrates how the Pacific iWrm project has been embedded in the core work of rmiePa.
ePa’s strategic direction is guided by the 3-year rolling Strategic Plan which serves as the foundation for the development of the annual Portfolio budget Statement. the ePa Strategic Plan follows the direction as detailed in the environment Protection authority act.
Alignment with the National Vision 2018
in working into the future, the authority takes into account the national Goals and objectives as stated in the vision 2018 Strategic development Plan framework, 2003-2018 with a firm commitment to ensuring that the preservation of the culture and heritage of the rmi is aligned with these overall national goals.
the specific functions and duties of the ePa, are mandated under the following acts and legislation:
○ an act to provide for the establishment of a national environmental Protection authority for the protection and management of the environment national environment Protection act 1984 [P.l. 1984-31][P.l. 1987-2]
○ the ePa is responsible for the administration, control, custody and management of the coastal Zone, and for the implementation of the provisions of the coastal conservation act (1988), with respect to the obligations and mandates described above in the environment Protection act (1984)[P.l. 1988-13].
○ Public health, Safety and Welfare act, chapter 1 Public health and Sanitation, ePa and the ministry of health work together to perform food inspections to improve safety of foods sold by grocery stores, restaurants and cooked food, and continues to do public awareness on the importance of having sanitary toilet facilities and septic systems.
○ ePa is also mandated to administer and enforce the following regulations: ozone layer Protection regulations (2004) and the Pesticides and Persistent organic; Pollutants (PoPs) regulations (2004); Public Water Supply regulation; marine Water Quality regulations; toilet facilities and Sewage disposal regulations; rmi Sustainable development regulations; Solid Waste regulations.
2. Management of the Gef Pacific IWrM national Demonstration Project in rMI
Lead Agency rmi environmental Protection authority
Memorandum of Agreement
Signed 29th May 2009
national iWrm focal Point
mr. lowell alik
General manager, rmi environmental Protection authority
national iWrm Project manager
mr julius lucky
rmi environmental Protection authority
7
Signing of the Memorandum of Agreement and Establishment of the Project Management Unit
the memorandum of agreement between rmi and the Pacific islands applied Geoscience commission (now the applied Geoscience and technology division of the Secretariat of the Pacific community) was signed on 29th may 2009 by the then General manager of rmiePa, mr. john bungitak. mr. bungitak and mr. Glann lewis attended the inception Workshop for the Gef Pacific iWrm Project convened in nadi, fiji in September 2009. Shortly thereafter, mr. bungitak’s employment with rmiePa was discontinued and he was replaced by ms. barker-manase in late 2009. at that time, ms. barker-manase formally assumed the role of rmi’s national iWrm focal Point for the regional Pacific iWrm Programme. See table 1 and 2 for summary information and contacts.
there followed the recruitment of a national Project manager for rmi’s national iWrm demonstration Project. ms. moriana Phillip was appointed national Project manager on 20th december 2009. the Project management unit (Pmu) was formally established at rmiePa in january 2010, including the appointment of mr. Glann lewis as demonstration Project assistant. both ms. barker-manase and ms. Phillip attended the
Second and third Pacific iWrm regional Steering committee meetings convened in the republic of Palau (july 2010) and the cook islands (july 2011)
as at 30 September 2011, the Pmu for the rmi Gef national iWrm demonstration Project had been operational for 21 of the 60 months initially identified as being required to successfully deliver the project. rmi worked during 2010, to strengthen the implementation of the european union supported iWrm Policy and Planning component of the Pacific iWrm Programme. this culminated in the development of a detailed national costed work plan aimed at stimulating this much needed area of work during 2011. ms. tamera heine was subsequently appointed national Water Policy Support officer and joined the Project management unit in december 2010.
the project management unit for the rmi have changed recently replacing the project manager, the focal point and appointing a new project assistant. the new Pmu consists of mr.julius lucky, the new project manager, mr.lowell alik the new ePa general manager and the new iWrm focal point, and mr.roderick kabua the new project assistant.
8
a start-up committee for the iWrm demonstration Project was first established in 2009 with members limited to traditional leaders, major landowners, and council officials from the local Government. following establishment of the Project management unit in 2010, effort was made to revitalise and expand the membership of this group. initially, traditional leaders and laura residents were invited to consultations to re-introduce project goals, objectives, and to ensure all key traditional leaders were adequately represented in these discussions.
the idea of establishing a formal body for the coordination of the Gef iWrm demonstration was first raised amongst key stakeholders in march 2010, and shortly thereafter the “laura integrated Water and land management advisory committee” was formed. this is informally referred to as the “laura lens committee” or “committee in kejparok aiboj lal eo ilo laura” in marshallese. discussions with stakeholders resulted in the following suggested actions to further strengthen membership and participation within the committee:
○ revitalization of participation through face-to-face consultations with key traditional leaders of laura. these consultations resulted in an expanded membership list to include representation of community leaders not in original membership list;
○ establishment of an advisory Sub-committee to act as Working Group of the committee;
○ elaboration of committee terms of reference to guide the work of the committee.
the (1) membership list and (2) terms of reference for the laura integrated Water and land management advisory committee and the
advisory Sub-committee/Working Group are included in this report as annex 1 and annex 2, respectively.the following diagram illustrating how the committee links to national decision making bodies.
Overview of National Coordination Mechanisms and Linkages with RMI’s GEF IWRM Demonstration Project
in october 2008, a cabinet resolution established a national iWrm Water task force (nWtf) and appointed ePa as the chair of this. the resolution however, contained no clear no clear specifications for membership. and at the time of establishment of the rmi iWrm Project management unit in 2010, there was no evidence of the nWtf ever having met. as such it was identified that the Gef iWrm demonstration project would work to make the nWtf operational in order to strengthen national coordination in the water and sanitation and to work towards the development of a national Water and Sanitation Policy and iWrm Plan.
accordingly, rmi ePa assembled a national taskforce team. this taskforce is comprised of officials from Governmental, non-Governmental organizations, and executive members of the laura integrated Water and land management advisory committee. letters were dispatched to all relevant water stakeholders, both in Government and non-Governmental organizations, inviting participation in the work of the taskforce. Whilst broad representation of all stakeholders was encouraged, high level representation from each Government ministry was encouraged with the assistance of the office of the chief Secretary. the full list of nWtf members is included in this report as annex 3.
once established, a key initiative of the national iWrm task force was the organisation and conduct of a national Water Summit from 22nd-23rd
3. establishment of a Coordinating Body for the operation of the Gef Pacific IWrM Demonstration Project in rMI
9
march 2011. this Summit was used inter alia to: launch the task force; identify its priority areas of work; and to agree on the steps needed to strengthen national coordination of water and sanitation initiatives (e.g. establishment of a formal Water commission) and to develop the national Water and Sanitation Policy and iWrm Plan. a Policy Sub-committee of the national task force force was formed in support of water policy development.
Development of a National Water and Sanitation Policy and the Establishment of the “RMI Water and Sanitation Commission”
the rmi Water and Sanitation Policy calls for the formal establishment of the “rmi national Water and Sanitation commission” to strengthen and formalise the functions and roles of the national iWrm task force. Since its establishment in october 2008, the task force has served a useful purpose in terms of coordinating water and sanitation policy and planning. however, the constitution, functions, and roles of the task force require further elaboration to better support the implementation of a national Water and Sanitation Policy and iWrm Plan. the body will also benefit greatly from strengthened institutional authority as a “commission”.
there is strong support among key stakeholders in the rmi on the need to establish this more formal, fully-functional and authoritative institution to serve as the rmi’s WatSan needs. the concept of a new Water and Sanitation commission has received support by the members of the task force, through consultations with policy makers, and during the march 2011 national Water Summit. the adoption of the new policy and the establishment of the commission are two key components in the larger effort to institutionalize and strengthen iWrm in the rmi. the draft national Water and Sanitation Policy can be obtained by contacting ms. barker-manase at rmi ePa.
Basic Functions and Roles of the Commission
the primary purpose of the commission will be to govern overall water and sanitation policy, planning, decision making and resource allocation in the rmi.
it has been identified that the commission shall:
○ be established at the highest level of authority and through well-designed enabling instruments. initially this would be via a detailed resolution to be jointly adopted by the cabinet and the nitijela. later on, this institution should be formally established and authorized via a new comprehensive iWrm Plan and law (proposed for late 2012);
○ have oversight and responsibility for the effective implementation of the Water and Sanitation Policy;
○ institutionalize its internal working relations through a multi-party ‘compact’ that clearly articulates each member’s roles and responsibilities and that commits the members to active participation in the nWab and its activities and endeavors;
○ have a very clearly articulated mandate, constitution (membership), structure, functions, roles, powers, procedures and protocols;
○ be inclusive, with representation from all key stakeholder groups in the country;
○ be comprised of geographic and thematic sub-bodies or sub-committees, structured along the main priorities and action areas for iWrm in the rmi (e.g. laura committee, Sanitation and health committee, ebeye committee, utilities committee, landowners, etc.);
○ include a ‘core’ working group (which meets more frequently) and a larger working group.
○ be well organized and coordinated, primarily through the services of a Secretariat, in the form of a iWrm coordination office (also to be established in 2012);
○ be active and proactive, meeting regularly (e.g. bi-monthly) and looking ‘beyond the horizon’ to anticipate emerging challenges and opportunities;
○ focus on effective coordination, both domestically (intergovernmental, national-local-community), regionally, and internationally (e.g. with donor and development partners);
○ utilize efficient resource allocation principles, including cost-benefit analysis and other objective criteria to inform decision making; and
○ be responsible for coordinating annual national Water day activities.
an active and effective national-level water institution that follows these main principles would constitute ‘key ingredient’ for more integrated and sustainable water resources management in the rmi.
10
a stakeholder analysis was undertaken in early 2010 to identify key stakeholders and brainstorm strategies for engaging these key groups and individuals. as part of the analysis an action Plan for Stakeholder engagement was developed (see annex 4). the following table summarizes the key stakeholders identified and strategies to engage them.
Some strategies have been successful to date in terms of engaging high ranking traditional leaders at the outset to encourage more community participation and support in the planning stages. other strategies will be undertaken starting end of 2011 such as the establishment of a “laura lens learning center” located in laura, to be accessible to schools and members of the general public. this center will exhibit educational materials, demonstration activities, models and other media. the table on the following page highlights key stakeholders and engagement strategies.
in the community, the traditional leaders and the landowners are the most influential; engaging them in decision making processes for the iWrm demonstration project has encouraged community ownership of the project. their participation has also been effective in encouraging interest from other community members. because community ownership of the project is essential for the sustainability of the initiative, it is crucial that these key groups are involved in the process
of the development of the key output, i.e., the laura Water and land management Plan.
Similarly, the involvement of high level government stakeholders in the national iWrm task force has been equally beneficial for the long term water and sanitation policy and planning initiatives of the project. this has stimulated high level government buy-in. the project was effective in facilitating the appointment of first lady hannah Zedkaia as rmi’s national Water and Sanitation champion in lead-up to the first national Water Summit convened on World Water day 2011. the first lady has provided high level, instrumental support to all key project initiatives which has proven very effective in terms of raising the awareness of the initiative and water and sanitation issues generally in the rmi.
to improve stakeholder participation, particularly with respect to the national Water and Sanitation Policy and iWrm Plan development, the Pmu plans to work closely and focus on the most influential stakeholders, including traditional leaders, the first lady, Politicians and active and influential community members to lobby support from groups that are against or are indifferent to the project.
4. Planning stakeholder Participation in the execution of the rMI Gef Pacific IWrM Demonstration Project
11
Stakeholder Key Interests & Why Engage? Strategies for Engagement
traditional leaders (chiefs and landowners)
○ highest ranking in traditional system
○ landowner and community leader.
○ advice, especially on traditional land issues
need to be engaged during the planning stages at each stage of the project. need to be fully informed and have clear understanding of project objectives to avoid high expectations.
risk of opposition from high ranking community members is reduced if this group has clear understanding of project objectives. this will facilitate community support during implementation on the ground.
community leaders (active community members, may have some land title rights)
landowner and community leader. community advisor and participation
Policy-Planning and implementation. community leaders may range from those with traditional land title and those without. both are key to implementation. engagement through committee meetings and advice and input on decision making for project activities, assign as points of contact in the community.
local Government council members
local government representatives for majuro-specifically laura village. can assist with mobilizing resources and/or organizing community events
Provide updates and information on project progress throughout implementation. Should be involved in decision making and enforcement at local government level
high level Government officials
landowner, traditional leader, farming and business. assistance & Support from the local Government and local communities
Political representatives from majuro, President is currently Paramount chief and has much traditional influence in laura. engagement through establishment of Water and Sanitation champion – first lady. high level briefings throughout project implementation
community associations/organizations including Womens Groups
farmers association, Womens Groups-handicrafts, catering of local foods. activities impact water resources, can help promote water campaigns traditional advise, education and participation
laura water lens meeting & laura community meeting. involvement in training programs relating to water and agriculture organized by the project.
non Government organizationsSynergies with existing programs and campaigns
technical meetings/trainings, community meetings and advisory group meetings
School childrenfuture leaders and take home messages
Study tours, educational center, School visits, activities and games
12
5.1 logframe development
the national Gef supported iWrm demonstration project in the rmi focuses on integrated Water and land management for the Sustainable use of the laura Water lens, majuro atoll. the overall aim of the demonstration Project is to achieve sustainable use of the majuro groundwater supply, namely the laura lens, focusing on practical demonstration of best practices to address national priority water issues and raise political will to act in the interests of iWrm. in 2010, the original scope of work was re-evaluated and the Pmu and laura lens committee worked to adjust planned activities to meet local needs, priorities, and available resources. a detailed project logical framework matrix (logframe) incorporating Smart indicators was developed during the first half of 2010 for final review and endorsement by the Second regional Steering committee for the Gef Pacific iWrm Project.
to assist with improving stakeholder awareness and understanding of the key areas of work and anticipated results of the project, the completed project logframe was translated into marshallese language for public comment. using inputs from several landowners and community representatives, the logframe was subsequently finalised in june 2010. the english and marshallese versions of the logframe are included in this report as annex 5.
5.2 Priority areas of Work and results
the following table summarises the priority objectives and activities of the iWrm project. the full project logframe is included with this report as annex 4.
5. results oriented Planning and Implementation of the Gef Pacific IWrM Demonstration Project in rMI
Project Objectives ActivityGoal:component 1: Strengthened coordination for integrated land and Water management at laura, majuro atoll
1.1 review of socio-economic and political factors influencing iWrm and Water use efficiency in the laura area of majuro atoll, including: (a) incentives; formal and informal institutions; and economic structures relating to water and land use in the laura area; (b) recommendations for national level reform of water sector1.2 establishment and operation of a national integrated Water resource management task force, to: (a) promote the effective development and management of water resources; (b) oversee development and implementation of a laura integrated Water and land resources management Plan (liWlrmP)1.3 formalise the laura integrated Water and land management advisory committee, including endorsement from the national integrated Water resource management task1.4 develop and implement a laura community Stakeholder engagement Plan, including identification of roles and responsibilities of local partners in project implementation1.5 develop and implement an iWrm and Water use efficiency capacity building Programme for the laura integrated Water and land management advisory committee1.6 develop and implement a community based Project to foster involvement of Women’s Groups in Water management and decision-making in the laura area
component 2: identification of key threats and management issues for the laura Water lens
2.1 development of a fine scale topographical map of the laura area
2.2 review of sanitation and waste management systems in laura, including: (a) identification of all septic systems and those requiring remediation; (b) solid waste disposal methods and sites; and (c) farm waste management. Summary of sanitation and waste management recommendations for laura.
13
2.3 review of the status of laura water and land resources, including identification of current and projected impacts, and recommendations for land use zoning.2.4 compilation of existing data and information to produce a GiS map of land use and potential sources of pollutants in the laura area2.5 identification of the benefits and costs of integrated water and land management in the laura area with: (a) identification of water allocation issues; (b) tariffs and price mechanism; (c) possible extraction fee; and (d) possible cost sharing arrangements (e.g. polluter versus beneficiary pays).
component 3: development of a laura integrated Water and land resources management Plan
3.1 establishment and operation of a technical Working Group of the liWlmac to develop a laura integrated Water and land resources management Plan (liWlrmP)3.2 agreement between and amongst water related agencies and funding bodies (both Government and external) of priority water problems and required management interventions at laura, including benchmarking of current and planned projects and financing levels.3.3 community forum meetings to agree needs and vision for the laura community for integrated water and land management at laura, including desired management goals, objectives, and targeted management actions.3.4 draft laura integrated Water and land resources management Plan, including targeted costed action plan and financing mechanisms presented to laura community for comment and reviewed by and endorsed by liWlmac for submission to cabinet3.5 laura integrated Water and land resources management Plan and action Plan submitted for cabinet endorsement
component 4: targeted Stress reduction demonstrations for the laura Water lens
4.1.1 development of a septic monitoring, collection, and disposal program to: (a) monitor sewage levels of septic tanks at laura; and (b) initiate timely sewage collection from overloaded and leaking septic systems and subsequent disposal using majuro’s public sewer system. [activity 2.2 to provide baseline information]
Sub-component 4.1
4.1.2 composting toilet designed and operational at central laura location, including: survey of community perceptions; preferred design features; and operational considerations.
Sub-component 4.2 – reducing Stress from domestic Solid Waste leachate Pollution at laura
4.2.1 based on results of 2.2 develop community-based project for solid domestic waste management at laura4.2.2 community survey of numbers, types, and suitable locations for solid waste bins and disposal areas4.2.3 development of education materials and activities to inform the community on domestic waste management (link to component 5).
Sub-component 4.3 – building capacity of Pig farmers to reduce Stress on the laura Water lens
4.3.1 identification of priority pig farms for involvement in trial, preferably farms located in low-lying coastal lands adjacent to water lens4.3.2 identification and development of techniques for the use of coconut husk in dry litter waste management at selected piggeries, specifically to produce compost for market garden fertiliser4.3.3 establishment of communal composting site for production of pig waste fertiliser
14
component 5: enhancing awareness and understanding of the laura Water lensSub-component 5.1: Public awareness 5.1.1 laura Water lens learning center in the laura area to assist with
promotion of demonstration project and dissemination of information materials5.1.2 exhibition materials for the learning center, including: learning displays (e.g. posters), interactive database/dvd-rom of information and data relating to laura water lens, and audio-visual materials (e.g. videos).5.1.3 Promotion of learning center role via local radio, local and regional television and print media, and a programme of visits by schools and other civil society groups5.1.4 network of local journalists and government communications staff to organise television and radio broadcasts and news articles about water conservation and stress reduction demonstration activities5.1.5 laura Water lens website based on open Source content management System Software (e.g. joomla) to act as a central repository of information and data relating to integrated water and land management at laura5.1.6 electronic dissemination of a quarterly demonstration project newsletter
Sub-component 5.2: training and education 5.2.1 training needs assessment and preparation of a training programme targeting government officers and local communities, including, identification of needs for specific training in areas such as sanitation, composting toilets etc.5.2.2 implementation of the training programme at the community level. i tis envisaged that training needs may include but not be limited to: principles and practice of water resource management; sanitation and sustainable solid waste disposal methods; septic maintenance and remediation techniques; water quality monitoring; and resource use zoning.5.2.3 implementation of the targeted training programme for government agencies and personnel. it is envisaged that training needs may include but not be limited to: economic valuation and cost sharing principles; interpretation of socio-economic and scientific data and its use in planning and zoning land use; and iWrm policy and planning5.2.4 identification of needs and opportunities for a group study tour (including rmiePa management staff and selected nGo community group members from laura) to selected Gef iWrm demonstration projects in the Pacific region.5.2.5 Preparation and distribution of posters, brochures and booklets on topics of relevance to iWrm and Water use efficiency as identified in the training needs assessment.
component 6: management and coordination of the laura demonstration Project
6.1 Successful management, coordination, and implementation of: the project to achieve the demonstration objectives and to meet the strategic needs of the republic of marshall island’s environmental Protection authority.6.2 effective planning and control of the endorsed6.3 establishment and effective operation of a demonstration Project management unit (Pmu) to: (a) manage the interface between the lead agency and the regional Project coordinating unit, user groups, and other stakeholders and government agencies; and to (b) manage the consultation process to ensure comprehensive input from user groups and other stakeholders into the development and implementation of the project6.4 consistency between the various project components and related activities provided or funded by other donor organisations, including realisation of co-financing where possible6.5 Participation of project representatives in meetings of the regional Project Steering committee meetings, and associated regional training and capacity building sessions
15
5.2.1 co-financing
the following tables highlights the co-financing that was realised and the additional funding that was leveraged from success of the project activities.
ISSUE KEY RESULT
institutional management of pressing water resource issues
establishment and operation of the national iWrm task force as rmi’s aPex body for coordination and Planning of Water and Sanitation investments and actions
Public awareness of water resource issues
Strengthened community engagement with national Government on Water and Sanitation issues via establishment and operation of the laura lens committee
contamination of the criticial laura lens from domestic and animal wastes
reduced stress on the laura Water lens by development and operation of septic remediation programme, pilot ecoSan, and conversion of piggeries from wash down waste disposal systems to dry litter systems
the following table provides a summary of key results linked to the projects goal and objectives. a comprehensive review of national results notes linked to performance indications can be found in annex 6.
16
5.2.4 key awareness materials
the rmi Gef Pacific iWrm demonstration project has adopted a storyline approach to documenting project progress and its impact on the social and natural environment. the marshall islands journal (mij) is the rmi’s regular newspaper and features weekly cartoons known by all marshallese. the demonstration project has established a partnership with the mij to regularly update the community on project progress and activities via cartoon sketches.
5.3 catalytic impacts
the dry-litter piggery systems were identified as the most effective methods of reducing the amount of pig waste issues. through piloting dry-litter systems, it has been brought into considerations by community members including local government council members to be the right solution in dealing with the pig waste management issues on laura. currently the only form of governance for pig waste management is the local government ordinance on pig waste management stating all pig farms are required to use septic systems for pig farming. With the good outcomes of the pilot project, suggestions have been made to revise the current ordinance to using dry-litter systems for pig waste management.
5.4 Participatory Planning, monitoring, and evaluation
during the inception period, the project focused on engaging traditional leaders in the planning stages to ensure overall agreement on and understanding of the project objectives. to date, the project has expanded its stakeholder focus to include high level officials in Government. table 3 above provides a summary overview of which stakeholders where particularly important and influential during the planning, monitoring, and reporting aspects of the project. the following summarises how different stakeholders are engaged in iWrm demonstration project planning, monitoring, and reporting. the Participatory Planning, monitoring, and reporting Plan is provided in annex 6.
the laura integrated Water and land management advisory committee’s (or laura lens committee) main role is to provide direction and strategic guidance to the Pmu and the environment Protection authority as the lead agency regarding the design and implementation of the national demonstration project. these include, but are not limited to: review and endorsement of quarterly work plans; evaluation of project progress; and assessment and oversight of stakeholder participation in the project.
in 2010 the Project management unit reviewed the status of the laura integrated Water and land management advisory committee’s (or laura lens committee) with a view to further elaborating the role of the committee in both the demonstration Site as well as in national planning processes relating to water and sanitation issues. consultations were undertaken in early 2010 with members of the committee to identify ways to improve participation at the community level. as a result of the consultations the following suggested actions were undertaken:
○ representation of traditional leaders, landowners, church groups, women’s groups, and residents of demonstration site expanded to include leaders not in original membership list
○ tor updated
○ advisory Group established to act as working group of the committee Pmu meets quarterly with the main committee (laura lens Protection committee) to provide updates on overall project progress.
the Pmu organises the meetings of the laura integrated Water and land management advisory committee to provide updates on overall project progress and ensure full participation in the planning of project activities, expenditures, and communications.
the advisory Sub-committee meets more frequently than the committee and acts as a small working group of the committee to: monitor progress of planned activities; work closely with the Pmu in facilitating communications between the Pmu and the community in laura; draft quarterly work plans and reports for review and endorsement by the full advisory committee. copies of Quarterly Work plans and budgets are provided to the advisory committee to inform members on upcoming project activities and get feedback and approval of quarterly plans.
regular meetings of the advisory Sub-committee also allow discussion on lessons learned from the perspective of the community and other stakeholders. members were selected by the main committee to allow more frequent input into planning, decision making and implementation. during these consultations, the Pmu provides updates on activities and results achieved. lessons learnt are then shared with the group and feedback and suggestions for alternative approaches are agreed on.
the detailed plan guiding the Participatory Planning, monitoring and reporting of the project is included in this report as annex 6.
17
6. strengthening national Coordination and IWrM Policy and Planning in rMI
6.1 linkages of demonstration activities with iWrm Planning
the iWrm demonstration project has demonstrated effective stress reduction pilot projects that have been part of the process for developing the water and sanitation policy. from the demonstration activities, the laura community recognizes the need for scaling up these demonstration pilot projects and the need to develop something that will help sustain the projects. through series of consultations and meetings, the iWrm national task force and the laura lens committee recognized that there was develop a formal national Water and Sanitation Policy.
the development process included a national water summit that convened on march 2011 capturing the community needs in terms of water and sanitation. these needs were then developed into the key elements of the policy document. this national Water and Sanitation Policy was endorsed by government in march 2014.
6.2 national iWrm Planning
the rmi national Water task force, established by cabinet in 2008 (see cabinet resolution in annex 2), currently serves as the tentative nWab for the rmi and has adopted a five-step approach for institutionalizing
iWrm in the rmi over the next two years.
in summary, the major steps to institutionalizing iWrm are as follows (with target dates indicated):
1. develop and adopt a new comprehensive, iWrm-based national Water and Sanitation Policy
2. formally establish and authorize a permanent and fully-functional rmi Water and Sanitation commission to serve as the overarching nWab and governance body for iWrm (target date: early 2012)
3. formally establish a permanent national iWrm coordination office to serve as the primary coordinating unit for water and sanitation policy and to serve as the Secretariat for the commission (target date: early 2012)
4. develop and adopt an iWrm medium-term action and investment Plan (target date: late 2011)
5. develop and enact a new iWrm law to further solidify rmi’s commitment to integrated and sustainable management in the water and sanitation sector (target date: late 2012)
18
7. Capturing Lessons Learned for replication and scaling-up of IWrM Best Practice in rMI
7.1 lessons learned
Committee Involvement in Planning and Decision Making
one of the lessons documented by the project involved postponement of a particular capacity building activity. the activity had been prescheduled prior to final agreement from all members of the committee. as a result the committee members suggested that alternative activities be prioritized. this issue may have been avoided if members were involved earlier in the planning of quarterly activities. it is very important that the committee adds insight can help improve the project; however, it is also very important to be careful as to be able to manage the inputs of the group as to not hinder progress.
Transparency and Honesty
a key lesson learned to date from the demonstration project is the importance of transparency when dealing with community groups, it is important to be clear that your efforts are dedicated to assisting them and that their ideas and time are valuable too. you do this carefully by allowing everyone (landowners or not) space to think, time to contribute, by doing this you give them a sense of ownership and responsibility to their decisions (for example, by agreeing on where the laura lens learning center should be, they are likely to make sure that it is safe all the time)
High Level Support
the iWrm Gef Pmu was heavily involved in the pre-planning and conducting the national Water and Sanitation Summit held in march
2010. one of the successes of this event was the very high level of participation even though the summit was a 2 day event. nominating a national Water and Sanitation champion – the first lady, was key to turning the event into a very high level and participatory event. this same approach has been recently used for the area of climate change.
Community
key lesson learned during the implementation of the project was the appointment of the former first lady hannah Zedkeia to be the national water champion for the rmi with the role of incorporating more women and local community members into the iWrm policy and planning. her role demonstrated to be effective by leading the national water summit heavily involving major community land owners, women’s groups, and other potential members that contributed inputs that lead to the development of the key elements of the water and sanitation policy.
7.2 replication and Scaling-up
the draft replication and scaling up plan for the demonstration project is included in this report as annex 7. it is envisaged that this replication and scaling up plan will be further elaborated as the project moves into activities to pilot water and land use management practices aimed at reducing stress on the laura lens. the capture of lessons learned from the activitieshave been used to inform the drafting of the rmi Water and Sanitation Policy that was endorsed in 2014, iWrm investment Plan, and iWrm law.
19
8. Planning the transition from IWrM to the regional ridge to reef Initiative
8.1 Scaling-up to broader integrated land, Water and coastal management
to be completed
20
annexes
annex 1: list of committee members and Photograph 21
annex 2: committee terms of reference 22
annex 3: updated Stakeholder analysis and engagement action Plan 25
annex 4: updated Project logframe including timing of deliverables 28
annex 5: national iWrm results note 36
annex 6: copies of awareness materials developed and media coverage 47
annex 7: Participatory monitoring and evaluation Plan 48
annex 8: replication and Scaling-up Plan 53
annex 9: iW pilot project logframe 54
21
annex 1: Laura Lens CommitteeList of Members of the Laura Integrated Water and Land Management
Advisory Committee (Laura Lens Committee), 2013 Jorelik Tibon
Chairman
Assistant Chief Secretary,
Chief Secretary’s Office
Ruth Harris
Advisor
Joubon Kabua
Council Woman, Iolap,
Laura Village
Shirolynn Kawakami
Council Woman, Iolap,
Laura Village
Jina David
CMI Land Grant Officer,
Arrak, Laura CMI Campus
Sepe Joash Maria Joash
Paul Rilang Anta Elbon
Silash Malachi Ain Kabua
Anthonio Rear Royal Ceasar
Aki Samuel Rondio Jormuly
Zebty Zebty Jnr.
ANNEX 1
List of Members of the Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee
(Commonly referred to as the Laura Lens Committee)
Ms. Ruth Harris Advisor Laura IWRM Advisor to the Laura Committee
Joubon Kabua Council Woman Iolap, Laura Village Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 528-8492
Shirolynn Kawakami Council Woman Iolap, Laura Village Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 528-8492
Mr. Jorelik Tibon Assistant Chief Secretary Chief Secretary’s Office and Chairman of Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee Laura, Village P.O. Box 15 Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 455-9713 [email protected]
Mr. Julius Lucky Laura IWRM Secretary to Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee P.O. Box 419 Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 455-9712 [email protected]
39
ANNEX 1
List of Members of the Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee
(Commonly referred to as the Laura Lens Committee)
Ms. Ruth Harris Advisor Laura IWRM Advisor to the Laura Committee
Joubon Kabua Council Woman Iolap, Laura Village Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 528-8492
Shirolynn Kawakami Council Woman Iolap, Laura Village Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 528-8492
Mr. Jorelik Tibon Assistant Chief Secretary Chief Secretary’s Office and Chairman of Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee Laura, Village P.O. Box 15 Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 455-9713 [email protected]
Mr. Julius Lucky Laura IWRM Secretary to Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee P.O. Box 419 Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 455-9712 [email protected]
39
ANNEX 1
List of Members of the Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee
(Commonly referred to as the Laura Lens Committee)
Ms. Ruth Harris Advisor Laura IWRM Advisor to the Laura Committee
Joubon Kabua Council Woman Iolap, Laura Village Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 528-8492
Shirolynn Kawakami Council Woman Iolap, Laura Village Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 528-8492
Mr. Jorelik Tibon Assistant Chief Secretary Chief Secretary’s Office and Chairman of Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee Laura, Village P.O. Box 15 Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 455-9713 [email protected]
Mr. Julius Lucky Laura IWRM Secretary to Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee P.O. Box 419 Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 455-9712 [email protected]
39
ANNEX 1
List of Members of the Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee
(Commonly referred to as the Laura Lens Committee)
Ms. Ruth Harris Advisor Laura IWRM Advisor to the Laura Committee
Joubon Kabua Council Woman Iolap, Laura Village Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 528-8492
Shirolynn Kawakami Council Woman Iolap, Laura Village Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 528-8492
Mr. Jorelik Tibon Assistant Chief Secretary Chief Secretary’s Office and Chairman of Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee Laura, Village P.O. Box 15 Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 455-9713 [email protected]
Mr. Julius Lucky Laura IWRM Secretary to Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee P.O. Box 419 Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 455-9712 [email protected]
39
40
Mr. Jina David CMI Land Grant Officer Arrak, Laura CMI Campus P.O Box Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 528-6631
Mr. Roderick Kabua Laura IWRM – Vice Chairman of the Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee Laura Village (692) 456-1530 [email protected]
Ms. Moriana Phillip IWRM Project Manager Environmental Protection Authority P.O. Box 1322 Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 625-3035 [email protected]
Mrs. Deborah Barker-Manase General Manager/National IWRM Focal Point Environmental Protection Authority P.O. Box 1322 Majuro, MH 96960 (692)625-3035 [email protected]
Ms. Tamera Heine Water Policy Support Officer Environmental Protection Authority P.O. Box 1322 Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 625-3035 [email protected]
Ms. Renee Cabral Project Coordinator Majuro Atoll Waste Company Majuro, MH 96960 (692) 247-2700
22
annex 2: Laura Lens Committee torANNEX 2
Terms of Reference for the Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee
(Commonly referred to as the Laura Lens Committee)
RationaleThe Laura groundwater lens and associated infiltration galleries and treatment facility is over 30 km west of the DUD area. Water is drawn from 7 infiltration galleries, all constructed around 1990. There is already a real risk of significant contamination of the water lens and if Laura is to be retained as a viable water resource for the greater Majuro population, action is urgently required.
RoleThe Committee’s main role is to facilitate safeguarding the Laura Lens from unsustainable use and over pollution from land-based activities
Responsibilities
Goals and Objectives
1. To provide direction and strategic guidance to the PMU and Lead Agency regarding the design and implementation of the national demonstration project
Receive, review and approve reports from the Project Management Unit regarding the outputs and outcomes of project activities
Review stakeholder involvement in project activities and take action where necessary to ensure appropriate levels of government, NGO, community, and private sector engagement
Review and evaluate, at the national level, progress in implementation of the project, and provide guidance for improvement to the PMU and Lead Agency (EPA) when necessary
2. To build community capacity in the implementation of the Groundwater Protection Plan
To establish a Working Committee of the Laura Lens (Groundwater) Protection Plan Periodically consult/inform the community of the status/condition of the lens. Identify potential sources of pollutants/contaminants to the Laura lens. Produce awareness and educational materials for the community-schools, residences, and
churches. Involve participation of Laura communities to assist in the campaign of the groundwater
protection plan.
3. Periodic meetings (monthly, quarterly or annually):
To consult/share new/update information-regarding implementation of the GEF Demonstration Project
Make/propose (action or strategic) plans, Develop/review policies, guidelines or standards for the development of the Laura
Groundwater Protection Plan. Review and revise TOR and role of Committee and members on an annual basis to ensure
adequate representation by key stakeholders.
4. Annually assess the plan, policies, guidelines or standards for the Groundwater Protection Plan
41
23
5. Membership & Roles
Chairman – Chairing of regular Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee Meetings, Review of Agenda Items-facilitate discussions. Also to sit on National IWRM Task Force and update members of issues affecting water and sanitation in Laura, and input into national level advice to government regarding water and sanitation.
Traditional Leaders & Landowners (Iroij and Alabs)There shall be adequate representation from Iroij and Alaps in the Committee. This membership shall be reviewed on an annual basis to ensure traditional leaders are informed of activities relating to water and sanitation in Laura.
Traditional leaders and landowners are one of the most influential decision makers in Laura and will need to be informed of results of studies on Laura Groundwater Lens in order to provide support in the implementation of plans, policies, guidelines and standards for Laura in relation to water and sanitation.
Local Government Representation
Councilmen/womenThere are (4) seats in the Majuro Atoll Local Government (MALGOV) council allocated to Laura Village. There shall be adequate representation of councilmen/women in the Committee to ensure close coordination with MALGOV.
Each councilman/woman represented in the Committee is responsible for coordinating with the Advisory Group in informing their constituents of any plan, policy, guidelines or standard that may be developed relating to water and sanitation in Laura. Council members are also responsible for informing Communities in Laura of any ordinances relating to water and sanitation and to assist the Committee in enforcing violations.
The Committee shall inform MALGOV Executive Council and Mayor on any recommendations affecting local ordinances for water and sanitation in Laura. As needed the Mayor and any other Executive Council Member may be invited to Committee meetings.
Laura Farm Association
There shall be (1) representative from the Laura Farm Association on the Committee.
The Laura Farm Association will be responsible for providing information on use of fertilizers (chemical and non chemical), water usage, waste disposal methods relating to agricultural activities in Laura. The representative of the Laura Farm Association shall also be responsible for informing the members of the association of any recommendations, activities, plans, standards or guidelines developed and agreed on by the Committee.
Government and Technical Representation The following offices shall be represented on the Committee and shall provide information and technical advice and recommendations to the Committee on matters relating to water and sanitation
Environmental Protection Authority- The RMI EPA as PMU for the IWRM GEF Demonstration Project shall provide to the Advisory Group and Committee quarterly reports on progress of the IWRM GEF Demonstration Project and may also provide quarterly updates on water quality-Total and Fecal Coliform (E.coli), Conductivity Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Salinity Chloride Nitrates, Heavy Metals, Pesticides, and other parameters as required to develop adequate guidelines for protecting the groundwater lens.
Majuro Water and Sewer Company - The MWSC shall provide to the Committee at its quarterly meetings, updates on extraction and pumping rates per quarter. Updates on septic suction operations for Laura residents requiring pumping of septic systems shall be provided listing schedule for residential pumping.
42
2443
National Weather Services-The National Weather Services shall be responsible for providing on a quarterly reporting on rainfall data, and forecasts, including data on rainfall collected at the demonstration site.
NON-Government/Community Based Organization Representation-There shall be at least one active NGO or CBO in the Laura community represented in the Committee. Each group shall coordinate with initiatives of the Committee to ensure activities are coordinated and complimentary.
ROC Taiwan Farm Technical Assistance to RMI-As needed a representative from the ROC Taiwan Farm Technical Assistance Program located in Laura shall be invited to quarterly or special meetings of the Committee. The Technical Mission shall provide information on all agriculture and animal husbandry activities that may impact on the laura groundwater lens. In addition the ROC Taiwan Farm shall be required to comply with any plan, guidelines, standards, policies developed and endorsed by the Committee.
Project Management Unit (Demo Project) - Administrative functions The PMU will consult with members of the Laura Committee and Advisory Group in work planning and will be responsible for providing quarterly updates to the Laura Lens Protection Committee on GEF Demo project activities
Meetings The Committee will meet regularly on a quarterly basis, and may call special meetings as required. The PMU will act as Secretariat for Committee meetings initially. The Chairman in coordination with the PMU shall organize and call quarterly and/or special meetings of the Committee.
Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee
IWRM Task Force
Office of the Chief Secretary
Office of the President & Cabinet
Nitijela (Parliament)
25
annex 3: stakeholder analysis and engagement action PlanG
EF-P
acif
ic IW
RM P
roje
ct
Coun
try
Stak
ehol
der
Enga
gem
ent
Ana
lysi
s an
d Pl
an
Coun
try:
Rep
ublic
of
Mar
shal
l Isl
ands
___
_
Stak
ehol
der
Ana
lysi
s RM
I-A
ctio
n pl
an f
or s
take
hold
er e
ngag
emen
t
Dem
onst
rati
on P
roje
ct C
ompo
nent
1
/
2 /
3
/
4 /
5
/
6 /
7
[For
incl
usio
n in
ann
ual w
orkp
lan
(and
bud
get)
if a
ppro
pria
te]
Co
mpo
nent
foc
us…
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
……
…..
1 St
akeh
olde
r (O
rgan
isat
ion/
post
/ na
me/
cont
act)
2
Key
inte
rest
s,
conc
erns
3
How
doe
s th
e pr
ojec
t af
fect
the
m?
4 H
ow s
uppo
rt-
ive
will
the
y be
? ++
; +
; =
; -
; -
-
How
muc
h in
flue
nce
Very
5 –
0
6 Pr
iori
ty
to e
ngag
e To
p 5
- 0
7 W
hat
do w
e ne
ed
/wan
t th
em t
o do
?
8 W
hat
(& h
ow)
do w
e do
to
enga
ge t
hem
? (t
o ge
t w
hat
we
need
) 9
Whe
n do
we
enga
ge t
hem
? 10
Who
lead
s?
1.
Wit
ten
Phill
ipo
Priv
ate
Lega
l At
torn
ey
Land
owne
r an
d Co
mm
unit
y Le
ader
Gre
ater
aw
aren
ess
of
the
proj
ect
&
appr
ecia
tion
for
nee
ds
to p
rote
ct L
aura
w
ater
lens
sou
rces
++
5 5
Prov
ide
lega
l adv
ice,
es
peci
ally
on
trad
itio
nal l
and
issu
es
Polic
y-Pl
anni
ng a
nd
impl
emen
tati
on
IWRM
Nat
iona
l st
akeh
olde
r m
eeti
ng
Laur
a W
ater
le
ns s
elec
ted
com
mit
tee
wit
h IW
RM’s
su
ppor
t
2.
Jore
lik T
ibon
D
eput
y Ch
ief
Secr
etar
y (R
MI)
Land
owne
r an
d Co
mm
unit
y Le
ader
Acce
ss t
o im
prov
e w
ater
qua
lity
and
quan
tity
++
5 5
Com
mun
ity
advi
sor
and
part
icip
atio
n
Polic
y-Pl
anni
ng a
nd
impl
emen
tati
on
IWRM
Nat
iona
l st
akeh
olde
r m
eeti
ng
Laur
a W
ater
le
ns s
elec
ted
com
mit
tee
wit
h IW
RM’s
su
ppor
t
3.
Joub
on K
abua
Co
unci
l Wom
an
Land
owne
r,
trad
itio
nal l
eade
r,
Farm
ing
and
Busi
ness
Prom
ote
publ
ic
rela
tion
, ac
cess
to
impr
ove
wat
er q
ualit
y an
d qu
anti
ty &
be
nefi
t of
the
pro
ject
at
tain
men
ts
++
5 5
Assi
stan
ce &
Sup
port
fr
om t
he L
ocal
G
over
nmen
t an
d lo
cal
com
mun
itie
s
Dec
isio
n m
akin
g &
Im
plem
enta
tion
Maj
uro
Loca
l G
over
nmen
t m
eeti
ng,
IWRM
Nat
iona
l st
akeh
olde
rs
mee
ting
, &
La
ura
wat
er
lens
co
mm
itte
e m
eeti
ng
Laur
a W
ater
le
ns s
elec
ted
com
mit
tee
wit
h IW
RM’s
su
ppor
t
4.
Ruth
Har
ris
Seni
or L
and
Ow
ner
Com
pens
atio
n, s
itti
ng
fee
& f
inan
cial
rew
ard
Extr
a so
urce
of
inco
me,
par
tici
pate
in
deci
sion
mak
ing
&
bene
fit
of t
he
proj
ects
att
ainm
ents
++
5 5
Trad
itio
nal
advi
se &
pa
rtic
ipat
ions
Trad
itio
nal &
dec
isio
n m
akin
g &
im
plem
enta
tion
Laur
a w
ater
le
ns m
eeti
ng,
Laur
a co
mm
unit
y m
eeti
ng
Laur
a w
ater
le
ns
com
mit
tee,
IW
RM s
uppo
rt
offi
ce &
MW
SC
5.
Ain
Kabu
a Se
nior
Lan
dow
ner
Com
mun
ity
Lead
er &
Bu
sine
ss
Publ
ic r
elat
ion,
acc
ess
to im
prov
e w
ater
qu
alit
y an
d qu
anti
ty &
be
nefi
t of
the
pro
ject
at
tain
men
ts
++
5 5
Trad
itio
nal a
dvis
e &
pa
rtic
ipat
ion
Trad
itio
nal &
Ele
ctio
n m
akin
g &
Im
plem
enta
tion
s
Laur
a w
ater
le
ns m
eeti
ngs
& L
aura
co
mm
unit
y m
eeti
ngs
Laur
a W
ater
le
ns s
elec
ted
com
mit
tee
wit
h IW
RM’s
su
ppor
t
6.
Jasp
er L
anki
Tr
adit
iona
l lea
der
& S
enio
r em
ploy
ee
of t
he M
ajur
o At
oll
Loca
l Gov
erne
men
t
Land
owne
r &
Co
mm
unit
y Le
ader
Publ
ic r
elat
ion
&
serv
e pe
ople
as
trad
itio
nal l
eade
r
++
5 5
Trad
itio
nal A
dvis
e,
educ
atio
n &
pa
rtic
ipat
ion
Trad
itio
nal &
Dec
isio
n m
akin
g &
im
plem
enta
tion
Laur
a w
ater
le
ns m
eeti
ngs
& L
aura
co
mm
unit
y m
eeti
ngs
Laur
a w
ater
le
ns
com
mit
tee,
IW
RM s
uppo
rt
offi
ce &
MW
SC
7.
Ronn
y Bo
kmej
Ch
air
pers
on f
or
the
Laur
a Fa
rmer
s As
soci
atio
n
Farm
ing
&
Com
mer
cial
de
velo
pmen
t
Publ
ic r
elat
ion
&
serv
e pe
ople
as
trad
itio
nal l
eade
r
++
5 5
Trad
itio
nal a
dvis
e,
educ
atio
n an
d pa
rtic
ipat
ion
Trad
itio
nal &
Dec
isio
n m
akin
g &
im
plem
enta
tion
s
Laur
a w
ater
le
ns m
eeti
ng
& L
aura
co
mm
unit
y
Laur
a w
ater
le
ns
com
mit
tee,
IW
RM s
uppo
rt
26
GEF
-Pac
ific
IWRM
Pro
ject
Co
untr
y St
akeh
olde
r En
gage
men
t A
naly
sis
and
Plan
Co
untr
y: R
epub
lic o
f M
arsh
all I
slan
ds _
___
mee
ting
of
fice
& M
WSC
8.
Tom
my
Laib
wij
Co
unci
lman
&
Busi
ness
Com
mun
ity
lead
er &
co
mm
erci
al
deve
lopm
ent
Acce
ss t
o w
ater
qu
alit
y an
d qu
anti
ty,
impr
ove
capa
city
bu
ildin
g of
far
min
g &
be
nefi
t fr
om
proj
ects
’att
ainm
ent
++
5 5
Assi
stan
ce &
Sup
port
fr
om t
he M
ajur
o At
oll
Loca
l Gov
ernm
ent
&
Part
icip
atio
n
Trad
itio
nal &
Dec
isio
n m
akin
g &
im
plem
enta
tion
Laur
a w
ater
le
ns m
eeti
ng
& L
aura
co
mm
unit
y m
eeti
ng
Laur
a w
ater
le
ns
com
mit
tee,
IW
RM s
uppo
rt
offi
ce &
MW
SC
9.
Anto
nio
Rear
Co
unci
lman
&
Trad
itio
nal l
eade
r
Com
mun
ity
lead
er &
bu
sine
ss d
evel
opm
ent
Publ
ic r
elat
ion,
acc
ess
to im
prov
e w
ater
qu
alit
y an
d qu
anti
ty &
be
nefi
t fr
om p
roje
cts
atta
inm
ents
++
5 5
Assi
stan
ce &
Sup
port
fr
om t
he M
ajur
o At
oll
Loca
l Gov
erne
men
t
Dec
isio
n m
akin
g an
d Im
plem
enta
tion
Maj
uro
atol
l lo
cal
gove
rnm
ent
mee
ting
, La
ura
com
mit
tee
mee
ting
Laur
a Le
ns
com
mit
tee,
IW
RM s
uppo
rt
offi
ce &
MW
SC
10.
Titu
s La
ngri
ne
May
or,
Maj
uro
Atol
l Lo
cal G
over
nmen
t
Land
owne
r,
com
mun
ity
lead
er
Prom
ote
polit
ical
ac
hiev
emen
t an
d pu
blic
rel
atio
n,
infl
uenc
e co
mm
unit
y ac
tion
++
5 5
Assi
stan
ce &
sup
port
fr
om M
ajur
o At
oll
Loca
l Gov
ernm
ent
&
Part
icip
atio
n
Dec
isio
n m
akin
g an
d im
plem
enta
tion
Maj
uro
Atol
l lo
cal
Gov
ernm
ent
&
Laur
a co
mm
unit
y m
eeti
ng
Laur
a w
ater
le
ns
com
mit
tee,
IW
RM s
uppo
rt
offi
ce &
MW
SC
11.
Isai
ah A
lee
Coun
cil &
Ex
ecut
ive
mem
ber
of M
ajur
o At
oll
Loca
l Gov
ernm
ent
adm
inis
trat
ion
and
trad
itio
nal l
eade
r
Land
owne
r &
Co
mm
unit
y le
ader
Publ
ic r
elat
ion,
ser
ve
peop
le a
s tr
adit
iona
l le
ader
, gr
eate
r aw
aren
ess
and
appr
ecia
tion
of
bene
fici
al p
urpo
se o
f th
e pr
ojec
t
++
5 5
Assi
stan
ce &
sup
port
fr
om M
ajur
o At
oll
Loca
l Gov
ernm
ent
&
Part
icip
atio
n
Dec
isio
n m
akin
g an
d im
plem
enta
tion
Maj
uro
Atol
l lo
cal
Gov
ernm
ent
&
Laur
a co
mm
unit
y m
eeti
ng
Laur
a w
ater
le
ns
com
mit
tee,
IW
RM s
uppo
rt
offi
ce &
MW
SC
12.
Shro
line
Kaw
akam
i O
ffic
ial s
taff
of
the
Maj
uro
loca
l go
vern
men
t
Land
owne
r,
com
mun
ity
lead
er &
ac
tive
mem
ber
for
the
wom
ens’
s N
GO
s gr
oups
Incr
ease
app
reci
atio
n an
d un
ders
tand
ing
of
the
proj
ect’
s go
al &
ob
ject
ive,
acc
ess
to
impr
ove
wat
er q
ualit
y &
qua
ntit
y &
ben
efit
fr
om t
he p
roje
cts’
at
tain
men
t
++
5 5
Assi
stan
ce &
sup
port
fr
om M
ajur
o At
oll
Loca
l Gov
ernm
ent
&
Part
icip
atio
n
Dec
isio
n m
akin
g an
d im
plem
enta
tion
Maj
uro
Atol
l lo
cal
Gov
ernm
ent
&
Laur
a co
mm
unit
y m
eeti
ng
Laur
a w
ater
le
ns
com
mit
tee,
IW
RM s
uppo
rt
offi
ce &
MW
SC
GEF
-Pac
ific
IWRM
Pro
ject
Co
untr
y St
akeh
olde
r En
gage
men
t A
naly
sis
and
Plan
Co
untr
y: R
epub
lic o
f M
arsh
all I
slan
ds _
___
St
akeh
olde
r A
naly
sis
Gui
danc
e N
otes
Purp
ose
Thro
ugh
stak
ehol
der
situ
atio
n an
alys
is,
iden
tify
eff
ecti
ve a
ctio
ns t
hat
will
cap
ture
the
pot
enti
al p
osit
ive
impa
ct
of s
uppo
rter
s an
d m
inim
ise
the
pote
ntia
l neg
ativ
e im
pact
of
oppo
sers
, in
ord
er t
o ac
hiev
e pl
anne
d pr
ojec
t IW
RM o
utco
mes
. Be
fore
you
st
art
Dec
ide
how
to
do t
his
stak
ehol
der
anal
ysis
.
Eith
er d
o it
glo
bally
for
the
who
le d
emo
proj
ect.
Or
do it
pro
ject
com
pone
nt b
y pr
ojec
t co
mpo
nent
.
Doi
ng it
glo
bally
may
be
quic
ker.
D
oing
it b
y co
mpo
nent
may
hel
p fo
cus
the
anal
ysis
and
the
eng
agem
ent
acti
on p
lan
mor
e pr
ecis
ely
on
stak
ehol
der
inte
rest
s, is
sues
and
con
trib
utio
n ne
eded
; a
nd h
elp
to li
nk t
he t
imin
g of
the
eng
agem
ent
acti
on
plan
wit
h th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of
the
com
pone
nt’s
act
ivit
ies.
St
art
each
com
pone
nt o
n a
new
she
et.
Are
ther
e an
y Ac
tion
Pla
n ac
tion
s th
at w
ill n
eed
to b
e re
flec
ted
in t
he 1
2-m
onth
wor
kpla
n, 1
2-m
onth
bud
get
and
the
log-
fram
e?
Mos
t co
untr
ies
have
a s
take
hold
er d
iagr
am t
hat
was
pre
pare
d du
ring
the
Niu
e W
orks
hop
in J
uly
2008
. T
his
coul
d be
a s
tart
ing
poin
t to
be
deve
lope
d.
But
keep
it s
impl
e an
d us
eful
.
Stak
ehol
der
anal
ysis
1 St
akeh
olde
r Id
enti
fy t
he m
ain
stak
ehol
ders
(or
gani
sati
on;
sect
ion;
pos
t; n
ame;
con
tact
) w
ho w
ill c
ontr
ibut
e to
, be
aff
ecte
d by
, be
sup
port
ive
of o
r op
posi
ng t
he d
emo
proj
ect
(com
pone
nt).
Fo
cus
on in
-cou
ntry
sta
keho
lder
s.
2 Ke
y in
tere
sts,
co
ncer
ns
Iden
tify
wha
t ar
e th
e m
ain
reas
ons
why
the
sta
keho
lder
s ar
e /w
ould
be
inte
rest
ed in
or
conc
erne
d ab
out
the
proj
ect
(com
pone
nt).
The
y w
ant
an a
dequ
ate
and
relia
ble
supp
ly o
f cl
ean
wat
er?
The
y w
ant
a fr
ee s
uppl
y of
w
ater
? T
hey
wan
t to
min
imiz
e fl
ood
dam
age?
The
y do
not
wan
t to
cha
nge
thei
r la
nd m
anag
emen
t or
pig
ef
flue
nt m
anag
emen
t pr
acti
ces?
The
y w
ant
to b
e ab
le t
o bu
ild o
n w
aste
land
plo
ts in
the
flo
od-p
lain
? T
hey
do
not
wan
t to
han
dle
thei
r ow
n sa
nita
tion
pro
duct
s?
3 H
ow d
oes
proj
ect
affe
ct
them
Iden
tify
the
way
s in
whi
ch t
he p
roje
ct (
com
pone
nt)
(act
ivit
ies
and
outp
uts)
will
aff
ect
the
stak
ehol
der?
W
ill it
af
fect
(le
ad t
o ch
ange
s in
, in
crea
se o
r de
crea
se)
and
if s
o ho
w w
ill it
aff
ect:
the
ir a
utho
rity
? t
heir
pow
er?
th
eir
auto
nom
y?
thei
r ai
ms?
the
ir p
rope
rty?
the
ir w
ork?
th
eir
budg
et?
the
ir li
velih
oods
& p
ract
ices
? t
heir
st
atus
? et
c
4 H
ow s
uppo
rt-
ive
will
the
y be
++
+
= -
--
Cons
ider
ing
the
abov
e, w
ill t
he s
take
hold
er b
e su
ppor
tive
of
the
proj
ect
(com
pone
nt)
or o
ppos
ing
or b
lock
ing
the
proj
ect
(com
pone
nt).
W
ill t
he s
take
hold
er b
e ve
ry s
uppo
rtiv
e (+
+),
sup
port
ive
(+);
ne
utra
l (=)
; o
ppos
ing
(-)
or s
tron
gly
oppo
sing
(--
) th
e pr
ojec
t (c
ompo
nent
)?
5 H
ow m
uch
infl
uenc
e Ve
ry 5
– 0
Your
ass
essm
ent
of h
ow m
uch
the
stak
ehol
der
will
be
able
to
infl
uenc
e th
e im
plem
enta
tion
and
ach
ieve
men
t of
th
e pr
ojec
t (c
ompo
nent
) –
by d
irec
t su
ppor
t or
blo
ckin
g; o
r in
dire
ctly
by
infl
uenc
ing
othe
rs t
o su
ppor
t or
blo
ck.
Ex
trem
ely
infl
uent
ial
5;
Ve
ry in
flue
ntia
l 4;
Q
uite
infl
uent
ial
3;
Som
e in
flue
nce
2;
Ve
ry li
mit
ed in
flue
nce
1;
N
o in
flue
nce
0;
6 Pr
iori
ty t
o en
gage
To
p pr
iori
ty 5
do
wn
4,3
,2,1
to
0 le
ast
Cons
ider
ing
the
abov
e, a
sses
s ho
w im
port
ant
it is
to
enga
ge t
he s
take
hold
er in
ord
er t
o ac
hiev
e th
e pr
ojec
t (c
ompo
nent
) ou
tcom
e. F
or e
xam
ple,
a s
take
hold
er w
ith
limit
ed in
flue
nce
and
alre
ady
supp
orti
ve o
f th
e pr
ojec
t m
ay b
e le
ss im
port
ant
to a
chie
ving
the
pro
ject
(co
mpo
nent
) ou
tcom
es t
han
a ve
ry in
flue
ntia
l st
akeh
olde
r w
ho is
str
ongl
y op
posi
ng t
he p
roje
ct.
Mor
e ef
fort
wou
ld b
e di
rect
ed t
o en
gagi
ng (
or e
ffec
tive
ly
side
linin
g) t
he in
flue
ntia
l and
neg
ativ
e st
akeh
olde
r
Stak
ehol
der
enga
gem
ent
acti
on p
lan
7 W
hat
do w
e ne
ed /
wan
t th
em t
o do
Dec
ide
whi
ch p
rior
ity
grou
ps t
o fo
cus
on f
or t
he e
ngag
emen
t ac
tion
pla
ns,
cons
ider
ing
reso
urce
s av
aila
ble.
Pr
iori
ty 3
upw
ards
(3-
5)?
Pri
orit
y 2
upw
ards
(2-
5)?
Or
all?
An
alys
e w
hat
it is
tha
t is
nee
ded
from
eac
h st
akeh
olde
r in
ord
er t
o ac
hiev
e th
e pr
ojec
t (c
ompo
nent
) ou
tcom
es:
Sa
ncti
on a
nd e
ndor
sem
ent?
Fi
nanc
ial o
r hu
man
res
ourc
es?
Hig
h pr
ofile
pub
lic s
uppo
rt?
Col
labo
rati
on a
nd
inco
rpor
atio
n of
act
ivit
ies
into
the
ir w
ork
plan
s?
Expe
rtis
e?
8 W
hat
do w
e do
to
enga
ge
them
&/o
r ho
w
(in
orde
r to
ac
hiev
e w
hat
we
need
)
Base
d on
the
pre
cedi
ng a
naly
sis,
wha
t w
ill w
e ne
ed t
o do
to
enga
ge t
he s
take
hold
ers,
in o
rder
to
max
imis
e th
e po
siti
ve in
flue
nce
of s
uppo
rter
s; w
in o
ver
stak
ehol
ders
who
are
neg
ativ
e; a
nd/o
r m
inim
ise
the
nega
tive
in
flue
nce
of t
hose
who
rem
ain
oppo
sed?
U
se in
flue
ntia
l sup
port
ers
as f
igur
e he
ads?
One
-to-
one
mee
ting
s?
Join
t pl
anni
ng d
iscu
ssio
ns?
Har
mon
isin
g w
orkp
lans
? S
ite
visi
ts?
Joi
nt im
plem
enta
tion
? J
oint
M&
E an
d re
view
? R
egul
ar b
rief
ings
– e
lect
roni
c, h
ard
copi
es?
Tar
gete
d co
mm
unic
atio
n/in
form
atio
n ca
mpa
ign?
An
adv
ocac
y ca
mpa
ign?
Lo
bbyi
ng s
enio
r de
cisi
on
mak
ers?
Fu
ndin
g?
Prov
ide
alte
rnat
ive
sour
ces
of li
velih
ood,
land
, w
ater
, st
atus
, au
thor
ity
etc
9 W
hen
do w
e en
gage
the
m
Whe
n do
the
eng
agem
ent
acti
viti
es n
eed
to s
tart
in o
rder
to
impl
emen
t th
e pr
ojec
t ac
tivi
ties
on
tim
e.
Whe
n do
seq
uent
ial a
nd f
ollo
w-u
p en
gage
men
t ac
tivi
ties
nee
d to
be
done
to
mat
ch t
he s
take
hold
er’s
pla
nnin
g an
d im
plem
enta
tion
cyc
le?
10 W
ho le
ads
Who
wit
hin
the
lead
age
ncy,
the
PM
U,
or o
ther
sta
keho
lder
s, w
ill b
e re
spon
sibl
e to
init
iate
, de
velo
p an
d fo
llow
th
roug
h w
ith
the
acti
on p
lan
step
?
Rem
embe
r to
o Th
e co
mm
unit
y ar
e al
so s
take
hold
ers!
In
clud
e th
em in
the
sta
keho
lder
ana
lysi
s .
The
com
mun
ity
is m
ade
up o
f di
ffer
ent
sub-
grou
ps:
lead
ers,
men
, w
omen
, yo
uth,
eld
ers,
mor
e in
flue
ntia
l, le
ss
infl
uent
ial,
bet
ter
reso
urce
d, le
ss w
ell r
esou
rced
all
of w
hom
may
hav
e di
ffer
ent
conc
erns
, in
tere
sts
and
infl
uenc
e.
27
GEF
-Pac
ific
IWRM
Pro
ject
Co
untr
y St
akeh
olde
r En
gage
men
t A
naly
sis
and
Plan
Co
untr
y: R
epub
lic o
f M
arsh
all I
slan
ds _
___
St
akeh
olde
r A
naly
sis
Gui
danc
e N
otes
Purp
ose
Thro
ugh
stak
ehol
der
situ
atio
n an
alys
is,
iden
tify
eff
ecti
ve a
ctio
ns t
hat
will
cap
ture
the
pot
enti
al p
osit
ive
impa
ct
of s
uppo
rter
s an
d m
inim
ise
the
pote
ntia
l neg
ativ
e im
pact
of
oppo
sers
, in
ord
er t
o ac
hiev
e pl
anne
d pr
ojec
t IW
RM o
utco
mes
. Be
fore
you
st
art
Dec
ide
how
to
do t
his
stak
ehol
der
anal
ysis
.
Eith
er d
o it
glo
bally
for
the
who
le d
emo
proj
ect.
Or
do it
pro
ject
com
pone
nt b
y pr
ojec
t co
mpo
nent
.
Doi
ng it
glo
bally
may
be
quic
ker.
D
oing
it b
y co
mpo
nent
may
hel
p fo
cus
the
anal
ysis
and
the
eng
agem
ent
acti
on p
lan
mor
e pr
ecis
ely
on
stak
ehol
der
inte
rest
s, is
sues
and
con
trib
utio
n ne
eded
; a
nd h
elp
to li
nk t
he t
imin
g of
the
eng
agem
ent
acti
on
plan
wit
h th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of
the
com
pone
nt’s
act
ivit
ies.
St
art
each
com
pone
nt o
n a
new
she
et.
Are
ther
e an
y Ac
tion
Pla
n ac
tion
s th
at w
ill n
eed
to b
e re
flec
ted
in t
he 1
2-m
onth
wor
kpla
n, 1
2-m
onth
bud
get
and
the
log-
fram
e?
Mos
t co
untr
ies
have
a s
take
hold
er d
iagr
am t
hat
was
pre
pare
d du
ring
the
Niu
e W
orks
hop
in J
uly
2008
. T
his
coul
d be
a s
tart
ing
poin
t to
be
deve
lope
d.
But
keep
it s
impl
e an
d us
eful
.
Stak
ehol
der
anal
ysis
1 St
akeh
olde
r Id
enti
fy t
he m
ain
stak
ehol
ders
(or
gani
sati
on;
sect
ion;
pos
t; n
ame;
con
tact
) w
ho w
ill c
ontr
ibut
e to
, be
aff
ecte
d by
, be
sup
port
ive
of o
r op
posi
ng t
he d
emo
proj
ect
(com
pone
nt).
Fo
cus
on in
-cou
ntry
sta
keho
lder
s.
2 Ke
y in
tere
sts,
co
ncer
ns
Iden
tify
wha
t ar
e th
e m
ain
reas
ons
why
the
sta
keho
lder
s ar
e /w
ould
be
inte
rest
ed in
or
conc
erne
d ab
out
the
proj
ect
(com
pone
nt).
The
y w
ant
an a
dequ
ate
and
relia
ble
supp
ly o
f cl
ean
wat
er?
The
y w
ant
a fr
ee s
uppl
y of
w
ater
? T
hey
wan
t to
min
imiz
e fl
ood
dam
age?
The
y do
not
wan
t to
cha
nge
thei
r la
nd m
anag
emen
t or
pig
ef
flue
nt m
anag
emen
t pr
acti
ces?
The
y w
ant
to b
e ab
le t
o bu
ild o
n w
aste
land
plo
ts in
the
flo
od-p
lain
? T
hey
do
not
wan
t to
han
dle
thei
r ow
n sa
nita
tion
pro
duct
s?
3 H
ow d
oes
proj
ect
affe
ct
them
Iden
tify
the
way
s in
whi
ch t
he p
roje
ct (
com
pone
nt)
(act
ivit
ies
and
outp
uts)
will
aff
ect
the
stak
ehol
der?
W
ill it
af
fect
(le
ad t
o ch
ange
s in
, in
crea
se o
r de
crea
se)
and
if s
o ho
w w
ill it
aff
ect:
the
ir a
utho
rity
? t
heir
pow
er?
th
eir
auto
nom
y?
thei
r ai
ms?
the
ir p
rope
rty?
the
ir w
ork?
th
eir
budg
et?
the
ir li
velih
oods
& p
ract
ices
? t
heir
st
atus
? et
c
4 H
ow s
uppo
rt-
ive
will
the
y be
++
+
= -
--
Cons
ider
ing
the
abov
e, w
ill t
he s
take
hold
er b
e su
ppor
tive
of
the
proj
ect
(com
pone
nt)
or o
ppos
ing
or b
lock
ing
the
proj
ect
(com
pone
nt).
W
ill t
he s
take
hold
er b
e ve
ry s
uppo
rtiv
e (+
+),
sup
port
ive
(+);
ne
utra
l (=)
; o
ppos
ing
(-)
or s
tron
gly
oppo
sing
(--
) th
e pr
ojec
t (c
ompo
nent
)?
5 H
ow m
uch
infl
uenc
e Ve
ry 5
– 0
Your
ass
essm
ent
of h
ow m
uch
the
stak
ehol
der
will
be
able
to
infl
uenc
e th
e im
plem
enta
tion
and
ach
ieve
men
t of
th
e pr
ojec
t (c
ompo
nent
) –
by d
irec
t su
ppor
t or
blo
ckin
g; o
r in
dire
ctly
by
infl
uenc
ing
othe
rs t
o su
ppor
t or
blo
ck.
Ex
trem
ely
infl
uent
ial
5;
Ve
ry in
flue
ntia
l 4;
Q
uite
infl
uent
ial
3;
Som
e in
flue
nce
2;
Ve
ry li
mit
ed in
flue
nce
1;
N
o in
flue
nce
0;
6 Pr
iori
ty t
o en
gage
To
p pr
iori
ty 5
do
wn
4,3
,2,1
to
0 le
ast
Cons
ider
ing
the
abov
e, a
sses
s ho
w im
port
ant
it is
to
enga
ge t
he s
take
hold
er in
ord
er t
o ac
hiev
e th
e pr
ojec
t (c
ompo
nent
) ou
tcom
e. F
or e
xam
ple,
a s
take
hold
er w
ith
limit
ed in
flue
nce
and
alre
ady
supp
orti
ve o
f th
e pr
ojec
t m
ay b
e le
ss im
port
ant
to a
chie
ving
the
pro
ject
(co
mpo
nent
) ou
tcom
es t
han
a ve
ry in
flue
ntia
l st
akeh
olde
r w
ho is
str
ongl
y op
posi
ng t
he p
roje
ct.
Mor
e ef
fort
wou
ld b
e di
rect
ed t
o en
gagi
ng (
or e
ffec
tive
ly
side
linin
g) t
he in
flue
ntia
l and
neg
ativ
e st
akeh
olde
r
Stak
ehol
der
enga
gem
ent
acti
on p
lan
7 W
hat
do w
e ne
ed /
wan
t th
em t
o do
Dec
ide
whi
ch p
rior
ity
grou
ps t
o fo
cus
on f
or t
he e
ngag
emen
t ac
tion
pla
ns,
cons
ider
ing
reso
urce
s av
aila
ble.
Pr
iori
ty 3
upw
ards
(3-
5)?
Pri
orit
y 2
upw
ards
(2-
5)?
Or
all?
An
alys
e w
hat
it is
tha
t is
nee
ded
from
eac
h st
akeh
olde
r in
ord
er t
o ac
hiev
e th
e pr
ojec
t (c
ompo
nent
) ou
tcom
es:
Sa
ncti
on a
nd e
ndor
sem
ent?
Fi
nanc
ial o
r hu
man
res
ourc
es?
Hig
h pr
ofile
pub
lic s
uppo
rt?
Col
labo
rati
on a
nd
inco
rpor
atio
n of
act
ivit
ies
into
the
ir w
ork
plan
s?
Expe
rtis
e?
8 W
hat
do w
e do
to
enga
ge
them
&/o
r h o
w
(in
orde
r to
ac
hiev
e w
hat
we
need
)
Base
d on
the
pre
cedi
ng a
naly
sis,
wha
t w
ill w
e ne
ed t
o do
to
enga
ge t
he s
take
hold
ers,
in o
rder
to
max
imis
e th
e po
siti
ve in
flue
nce
of s
uppo
rter
s; w
in o
ver
stak
ehol
ders
who
are
neg
ativ
e; a
nd/o
r m
inim
ise
the
nega
tive
in
flue
nce
of t
hose
who
rem
ain
oppo
sed?
U
se in
flue
ntia
l sup
port
ers
as f
igur
e he
ads?
One
-to-
one
mee
ting
s?
Join
t pl
anni
ng d
iscu
ssio
ns?
Har
mon
isin
g w
orkp
lans
? S
ite
visi
ts?
Joi
nt im
plem
enta
tion
? J
oint
M&
E an
d re
view
? R
egul
ar b
rief
ings
– e
lect
roni
c, h
ard
copi
es?
Tar
gete
d co
mm
unic
atio
n/in
form
atio
n ca
mpa
ign?
An
adv
ocac
y ca
mpa
ign?
Lo
bbyi
ng s
enio
r de
cisi
on
mak
ers?
Fu
ndin
g?
Prov
ide
alte
rnat
ive
sour
ces
of li
velih
ood,
land
, w
ater
, st
atus
, au
thor
ity
etc
9 W
hen
do w
e en
gage
the
m
Whe
n do
the
eng
agem
ent
acti
viti
es n
eed
to s
tart
in o
rder
to
impl
emen
t th
e pr
ojec
t ac
tivi
ties
on
tim
e.
Whe
n do
seq
uent
ial a
nd f
ollo
w-u
p en
gage
men
t ac
tivi
ties
nee
d to
be
done
to
mat
ch t
he s
take
hold
er’s
pla
nnin
g an
d im
plem
enta
tion
cyc
le?
10 W
ho le
ads
Who
wit
hin
the
lead
age
ncy,
the
PM
U,
or o
ther
sta
keho
lder
s, w
ill b
e re
spon
sibl
e to
init
iate
, de
velo
p an
d fo
llow
th
roug
h w
ith
the
acti
on p
lan
step
?
Rem
embe
r to
o Th
e co
mm
unit
y ar
e al
so s
take
hold
ers!
In
clud
e th
em in
the
sta
keho
lder
ana
lysi
s .
The
com
mun
ity
is m
ade
up o
f di
ffer
ent
sub-
grou
ps:
lead
ers,
men
, w
omen
, yo
uth,
eld
ers,
mor
e in
flue
ntia
l, le
ss
infl
uent
ial,
bet
ter
reso
urce
d, le
ss w
ell r
esou
rced
all
of w
hom
may
hav
e di
ffer
ent
conc
erns
, in
tere
sts
and
infl
uenc
e.
28
annex 4: IWrM Logframe
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/Out
com
e K
ey In
dica
tors
M
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n A
ssum
ptio
ns/R
isks
R
espo
nsib
le
Part
ners
Com
pone
nt 1
: Str
engt
hene
d C
oord
inat
ion
for I
nteg
rate
d La
nd a
nd W
ater
Man
agem
ent a
t Lau
ra, M
ajur
o A
toll
1.1
Rev
iew
of s
ocio
-eco
nom
ic
and
polit
ical
fact
ors
influ
enci
ng IW
RM
and
Wat
er
Use
Effi
cien
cy in
the
Laur
a Ar
ea o
f Maj
uro
Atol
l, in
clud
ing:
(a) i
ncen
tives
; fo
rmal
and
info
rmal
in
stitu
tions
; and
eco
nom
ic
stru
ctur
es re
latin
g to
wat
er
and
land
use
in th
e La
ura
area
; (b)
reco
mm
enda
tions
fo
r nat
iona
l lev
el re
form
of
wat
er s
ecto
r
Term
s of
Ref
eren
ce a
nd K
ey
Del
iver
able
s fo
r stu
dy
iden
tifie
d by
Aug
ust 2
010
Con
sulta
nt/p
erso
nnel
for
stud
y re
crui
ted
by O
ctob
er
2010
D
raft
repo
rt pr
esen
ted
to
NIW
RM
TF a
nd L
IWLM
AC fo
r re
view
and
com
men
t by
Janu
ary
2011
Fi
nal r
epor
t end
orse
d by
M
arch
201
1
Cal
l for
exp
ress
ions
of
inte
rest
in a
ppro
pria
te
natio
nal a
nd re
gion
al m
edia
C
onsu
ltant
or R
MIE
PA s
taff
cont
ract
Li
st o
f com
men
ts fr
om
natio
nal a
nd L
aura
co
mm
ittee
s Fi
nal e
ndor
sed
repo
rt
In-c
ount
ry c
apac
ity a
nd
acce
ss to
con
sulta
nts
able
to
addr
ess
com
plex
sci
entif
ic,
tech
nica
l, so
cio-
econ
omic
, in
stitu
tiona
l, an
d po
litic
al
fact
ors
influ
enci
ng w
ater
re
sour
ce m
anag
emen
t in
Maj
uro/
Laur
a
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), c
onsu
ltant
1.2
Rev
italis
atio
n an
d O
pera
tion
of a
Nat
iona
l Int
egra
ted
Wat
er R
esou
rce
Man
agem
ent T
ask
Forc
e, to
: (a
) pro
mot
e th
e ef
fect
ive
deve
lopm
ent a
nd
man
agem
ent o
f wat
er
reso
urce
s; (b
) ove
rsee
de
velo
pmen
t and
im
plem
enta
tion
of a
Lau
ra
Inte
grat
ed W
ater
and
Lan
d R
esou
rces
Man
agem
ent
Plan
(LIW
LRM
P)
Term
s of
Ref
eren
ce;
Mem
bers
hip
List
; and
Pr
ogra
mm
e of
Wor
k,
incl
udin
g M
eetin
g Sc
hedu
le
agre
ed b
etw
een
RM
IEPA
an
d w
ater
sta
keho
lder
s by
Se
ptem
ber 2
010.
Q
uarte
rly m
eetin
gs o
f the
N
atio
nal I
nteg
rate
d W
ater
R
esou
rce
Man
agem
ent T
ask
Forc
e, c
haire
d by
RM
IEP
A
Rep
ort o
f Inc
eptio
n M
eetin
g to
laun
ch In
tegr
ated
Wat
er
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Tas
k Fo
rce,
con
tain
ing
agre
ed
Term
s of
Ref
eren
ce;
Mem
bers
hip
List
; and
Pr
ogra
mm
e of
Wor
k.
Min
utes
of q
uarte
rly
mee
tings
.
Suffi
cien
t buy
-in/s
uppo
rt fro
m
rele
vant
gov
ernm
ent
Min
istri
es a
nd a
genc
ies
for
Inte
grat
ed W
ater
Res
ourc
es
Man
agem
ent
Dem
and
from
gov
ernm
ent
offic
ials
for s
ittin
g fe
es
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), M
inis
try o
f R
esou
rces
and
D
evel
opm
ent
1.3
Form
alis
e th
e La
ura
Inte
grat
ed W
ater
and
Lan
d M
anag
emen
t Adv
isor
y C
omm
ittee
, inc
ludi
ng
endo
rsem
ent f
rom
the
Nat
iona
l Int
egra
ted
Wat
er
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Tas
k
Agre
ed T
erm
s of
Ref
eren
ce;
Mem
bers
hip
List
; and
Pr
ogra
mm
e of
Wor
k,
incl
udin
g m
eetin
g sc
hedu
le
by S
epte
mbe
r 201
0.
Qua
rterly
mee
tings
of t
he
Laur
a In
tegr
ated
Wat
er a
nd
Rep
ort o
f Mee
ting
incl
udin
g ag
reed
Ter
ms
of R
efer
ence
; fin
alis
ed M
embe
rshi
p Li
st;
and
Prog
ram
me
of W
ork
2010
-201
1 M
inut
es o
f qua
rterly
m
eetin
gs.
Suffi
cien
t buy
-in/s
uppo
rt fro
m
Laur
a la
ndow
ners
, far
m
oper
ator
s, a
nd p
rivat
e se
ctor
(in
clud
ing
Mar
shal
ls W
ater
an
d Se
wag
e C
ompa
ny)
Cos
t of s
ittin
g fe
es
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I)
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/Out
com
e K
ey In
dica
tors
M
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n A
ssum
ptio
ns/R
isks
R
espo
nsib
le
Part
ners
Fo
rce
Land
Man
agem
ent A
dvis
ory
Com
mitt
ee
1.4
Dev
elop
and
Impl
emen
t a
Laur
a C
omm
unity
St
akeh
olde
r Eng
agem
ent
Plan
, inc
ludi
ng id
entif
icat
ion
of ro
les
and
resp
onsi
bilit
ies
of lo
cal p
artn
ers
in p
roje
ct
impl
emen
tatio
n
Com
mun
ity S
take
hold
er
Con
sulta
tion
Wor
ksho
p(s)
co
nven
ed b
y D
ecem
ber 2
010
Rol
es o
f loc
al p
artn
ers
in
proj
ect i
mpl
emen
tatio
n id
entif
ied
and
stak
ehol
der
enga
gem
ent p
lan
endo
rsed
by
LIW
LMAC
by
Mar
ch 2
011
Doc
umen
tatio
n of
co
nsul
tatio
n w
orks
hops
(s
umm
arie
s, n
ews
item
s,
audi
o-vi
sual
mat
eria
ls)
Endo
rsed
eng
agem
ent p
lan
Loca
l par
tner
com
mitm
ent t
o co
nsul
tativ
e pr
oces
s C
onfli
ct o
f int
eres
ts b
etw
een
and
amon
g lo
cal c
omm
unity
re
pres
enta
tives
and
loca
l pa
rtner
s (e
.g. N
GO
s)
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), L
IWLM
AC
1.5
Dev
elop
and
Impl
emen
t an
IWR
M a
nd W
ater
Use
Ef
ficie
ncy
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g Pr
ogra
mm
e fo
r the
Lau
ra
Inte
grat
ed W
ater
and
Lan
d M
anag
emen
t Adv
isor
y C
omm
ittee
Cap
acity
nee
ds a
sses
smen
t of
LIW
LMAC
con
duct
ed b
y Se
ptem
ber 2
010
Cap
acity
bui
ldin
g pr
ogra
mm
e de
velo
ped
by D
ecem
ber
2010
W
orks
hops
con
duct
ed in
co
njun
ctio
n w
ith q
uarte
rly
mee
tings
of t
he L
IWLM
AC
Cap
acity
nee
ds a
sses
smen
t re
port,
incl
udin
g su
rvey
re
sults
R
epor
t sum
mar
isin
g ca
paci
ty
build
ing
prog
ram
me
Wor
ksho
p do
cum
enta
tion,
au
dio-
visu
al m
ater
ials
, e.g
., (P
ower
Poin
t slid
es)
Avai
labi
lity
of e
ngag
ing
and
inte
ract
ive
train
ing
mat
eria
ls
and
activ
ities
W
illing
ness
of c
omm
ittee
m
embe
rs to
par
ticip
ate
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
LIW
LMAC
1.6
Dev
elop
and
Impl
emen
t a
Com
mun
ity B
ased
Pro
ject
to
Fost
er In
volv
emen
t of
Wom
en’s
Gro
ups
in W
ater
M
anag
emen
t and
Dec
isio
n-M
akin
g in
the
Laur
a Ar
ea
Proj
ect c
once
pt d
evel
oped
in
conj
unct
ion
with
NG
O a
nd
Wom
en’s
Gro
ups
by
Dec
embe
r 201
0 Pr
ojec
t fun
ding
sou
rce
iden
tifie
d by
Mar
ch 2
011
Proj
ect o
pera
tiona
l and
co
mpl
eted
by
Dec
embe
r 20
12
Proj
ect c
once
pt n
ote
and
prop
osal
to fu
ndin
g ag
ency
(e
.g. G
EF S
mal
l Gra
nts
Prog
ram
me)
Pr
ojec
t app
rova
l and
fund
ing
rece
ived
Pr
ojec
t im
plem
enta
tion
revi
ews
and
repo
rts
Avai
labi
lity
of fu
nds
for
com
mun
ity p
roje
cts
on w
ater
in
the
Paci
fic Is
land
C
ount
ries
Com
mitm
ent f
rom
NG
O’s
an
d W
omen
’s G
roup
s to
de
velo
p an
d ex
ecut
e pr
ojec
t
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), N
GO
s, a
nd
Wom
en’s
Gro
ups
C
ompo
nent
2: I
dent
ifica
tion
of K
ey T
hrea
ts a
nd M
anag
emen
t Iss
ues
for t
he L
aura
Wat
er L
ens
2.
1 D
evel
opm
ent o
f a fi
ne s
cale
to
pogr
aphi
cal m
ap o
f the
La
ura
Area
Term
s of
Ref
eren
ce fo
r su
rvey
agr
eed
by L
IWLM
AC
by J
uly
2010
C
onsu
ltant
/per
sonn
el fo
r st
udy
recr
uite
d by
Sep
tem
ber
2010
Agre
ed T
erm
s of
Ref
eren
ce
Con
sulta
nt/p
erso
nnel
co
ntra
cts
Topo
grap
hica
l map
Avai
labi
lity
of s
urve
yors
R
MIE
PA,
GEF
IW
RM
Pro
ject
M
anag
emen
t Uni
t (R
MI),
con
sulta
nts
29
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/Out
com
e K
ey In
dica
tors
M
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n A
ssum
ptio
ns/R
isks
R
espo
nsib
le
Part
ners
Fo
rce
Land
Man
agem
ent A
dvis
ory
Com
mitt
ee
1.4
Dev
elop
and
Impl
emen
t a
Laur
a C
omm
unity
St
akeh
olde
r Eng
agem
ent
Plan
, inc
ludi
ng id
entif
icat
ion
of ro
les
and
resp
onsi
bilit
ies
of lo
cal p
artn
ers
in p
roje
ct
impl
emen
tatio
n
Com
mun
ity S
take
hold
er
Con
sulta
tion
Wor
ksho
p(s)
co
nven
ed b
y D
ecem
ber 2
010
Rol
es o
f loc
al p
artn
ers
in
proj
ect i
mpl
emen
tatio
n id
entif
ied
and
stak
ehol
der
enga
gem
ent p
lan
endo
rsed
by
LIW
LMAC
by
Mar
ch 2
011
Doc
umen
tatio
n of
co
nsul
tatio
n w
orks
hops
(s
umm
arie
s, n
ews
item
s,
audi
o-vi
sual
mat
eria
ls)
Endo
rsed
eng
agem
ent p
lan
Loca
l par
tner
com
mitm
ent t
o co
nsul
tativ
e pr
oces
s C
onfli
ct o
f int
eres
ts b
etw
een
and
amon
g lo
cal c
omm
unity
re
pres
enta
tives
and
loca
l pa
rtner
s (e
.g. N
GO
s)
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), L
IWLM
AC
1.5
Dev
elop
and
Impl
emen
t an
IWR
M a
nd W
ater
Use
Ef
ficie
ncy
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g Pr
ogra
mm
e fo
r the
Lau
ra
Inte
grat
ed W
ater
and
Lan
d M
anag
emen
t Adv
isor
y C
omm
ittee
Cap
acity
nee
ds a
sses
smen
t of
LIW
LMAC
con
duct
ed b
y Se
ptem
ber 2
010
Cap
acity
bui
ldin
g pr
ogra
mm
e de
velo
ped
by D
ecem
ber
2010
W
orks
hops
con
duct
ed in
co
njun
ctio
n w
ith q
uarte
rly
mee
tings
of t
he L
IWLM
AC
Cap
acity
nee
ds a
sses
smen
t re
port,
incl
udin
g su
rvey
re
sults
R
epor
t sum
mar
isin
g ca
paci
ty
build
ing
prog
ram
me
Wor
ksho
p do
cum
enta
tion,
au
dio-
visu
al m
ater
ials
, e.g
., (P
ower
Poin
t slid
es)
Avai
labi
lity
of e
ngag
ing
and
inte
ract
ive
train
ing
mat
eria
ls
and
activ
ities
W
illing
ness
of c
omm
ittee
m
embe
rs to
par
ticip
ate
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
LIW
LMAC
1.6
Dev
elop
and
Impl
emen
t a
Com
mun
ity B
ased
Pro
ject
to
Fost
er In
volv
emen
t of
Wom
en’s
Gro
ups
in W
ater
M
anag
emen
t and
Dec
isio
n-M
akin
g in
the
Laur
a Ar
ea
Proj
ect c
once
pt d
evel
oped
in
conj
unct
ion
with
NG
O a
nd
Wom
en’s
Gro
ups
by
Dec
embe
r 201
0 Pr
ojec
t fun
ding
sou
rce
iden
tifie
d by
Mar
ch 2
011
Proj
ect o
pera
tiona
l and
co
mpl
eted
by
Dec
embe
r 20
12
Proj
ect c
once
pt n
ote
and
prop
osal
to fu
ndin
g ag
ency
(e
.g. G
EF S
mal
l Gra
nts
Prog
ram
me)
Pr
ojec
t app
rova
l and
fund
ing
rece
ived
Pr
ojec
t im
plem
enta
tion
revi
ews
and
repo
rts
Avai
labi
lity
of fu
nds
for
com
mun
ity p
roje
cts
on w
ater
in
the
Paci
fic Is
land
C
ount
ries
Com
mitm
ent f
rom
NG
O’s
an
d W
omen
’s G
roup
s to
de
velo
p an
d ex
ecut
e pr
ojec
t
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), N
GO
s, a
nd
Wom
en’s
Gro
ups
C
ompo
nent
2: I
dent
ifica
tion
of K
ey T
hrea
ts a
nd M
anag
emen
t Iss
ues
for t
he L
aura
Wat
er L
ens
2.
1 D
evel
opm
ent o
f a fi
ne s
cale
to
pogr
aphi
cal m
ap o
f the
La
ura
Area
Term
s of
Ref
eren
ce fo
r su
rvey
agr
eed
by L
IWLM
AC
by J
uly
2010
C
onsu
ltant
/per
sonn
el fo
r st
udy
recr
uite
d by
Sep
tem
ber
2010
Agre
ed T
erm
s of
Ref
eren
ce
Con
sulta
nt/p
erso
nnel
co
ntra
cts
Topo
grap
hica
l map
Avai
labi
lity
of s
urve
yors
R
MIE
PA,
GEF
IW
RM
Pro
ject
M
anag
emen
t Uni
t (R
MI),
con
sulta
nts
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/Out
com
e K
ey In
dica
tors
M
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n A
ssum
ptio
ns/R
isks
R
espo
nsib
le
Par
tner
s S
urve
y co
nduc
ted
and
map
pr
oduc
ed b
y M
arch
201
1 2.
2 R
evie
w o
f san
itatio
n an
d w
aste
man
agem
ent s
yste
ms
in L
aura
, inc
ludi
ng: (
a)
iden
tific
atio
n of
all
sept
ic
syst
ems
and
thos
e re
quiri
ng
rem
edia
tion;
(b) s
olid
was
te
disp
osal
met
hods
and
site
s;
and
(c) f
arm
was
te
man
agem
ent.
Sum
mar
y of
sa
nita
tion
and
was
te
man
agem
ent
reco
mm
enda
tions
for L
aura
.
Ter
ms
of R
efer
ence
for
surv
ey a
gree
d by
LIW
LMA
C
by S
epte
mbe
r 201
0 C
onsu
ltant
/per
sonn
el fo
r st
udy
recr
uite
d by
Dec
embe
r 20
10
Rev
iew
com
plet
ed a
nd re
port
incl
udin
g re
com
men
datio
ns
prod
uced
by
Mar
ch 2
011
Agr
eed
Ter
ms
of R
efer
ence
C
onsu
ltant
/per
sonn
el
cont
ract
s R
evie
w r
epor
t end
orse
d by
LI
WLM
AC
Ava
ilabi
lity
of s
uita
ble
sani
tatio
n an
d w
aste
m
anag
emen
t exp
ertis
e P
artic
ipat
ion
of la
ndow
ners
an
d
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
cons
ulta
nt(s
)
2.3
Rev
iew
of t
he s
tatu
s of
Lau
ra
wat
er a
nd la
nd re
sour
ces,
in
clud
ing
iden
tific
atio
n of
cu
rren
t and
pro
ject
ed
impa
cts,
and
re
com
men
datio
ns fo
r lan
d us
e zo
ning
.
Ter
ms
of R
efer
ence
for
surv
ey a
gree
d by
LIW
LMA
C
by D
ecem
ber
2010
C
onsu
ltant
/per
sonn
el fo
r st
udy
recr
uite
d by
Feb
ruar
y 20
111
Rev
iew
com
plet
ed a
nd re
port
prod
uced
by
June
201
1
Agr
eed
Ter
ms
of R
efer
ence
C
onsu
ltant
/per
sonn
el
cont
ract
s R
evie
w r
epor
t
Ava
ilabi
lity
of s
peci
alis
t with
ca
paci
ty to
reco
ncile
sc
ient
ific,
tech
nica
l, an
d po
litic
al is
sues
rela
ting
to th
e La
ura
area
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
cons
ulta
nt(s
)
2.4
Com
pila
tion
of e
xist
ing
data
an
d in
form
atio
n to
pro
duce
a
GIS
map
of l
and
use
and
pote
ntia
l sou
rces
of
pollu
tant
s in
the
Laur
a ar
ea
Land
use
, pol
luta
nt s
ourc
es,
grou
ndw
ater
wel
ls, a
nd w
ater
qu
ality
(DO
, pH
, Sal
inity
, co
lifor
m) f
or th
e La
ura
Wat
er
Lens
map
ped
to e
stab
lish
base
lines
by
June
201
1
Rep
ort i
nclu
ding
map
s of
la
nd u
se, p
ollu
tant
sou
rces
, rip
aria
n zo
nes,
gro
undw
ater
w
ells
, and
wat
er q
ualit
y of
th
e La
ura
Wat
er L
ens
revi
ewed
and
end
orse
d by
th
e LI
WLM
AC
Cap
acity
and
acc
ess
to
info
rmat
ion
and
data
E
xist
ing
info
rmat
ion
prov
ides
da
ta re
pres
enta
tive
of
base
line
cond
ition
s fo
r the
La
ura
Wat
er L
ens
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I)
2.5
Iden
tific
atio
n of
the
bene
fits
and
cost
s of
inte
grat
ed w
ater
an
d la
nd m
anag
emen
t in
the
Laur
a ar
ea w
ith: (
a)
iden
tific
atio
n of
wat
er
allo
catio
n is
sues
; (b)
tarif
fs
and
pric
e m
echa
nism
; (c)
Ter
ms
of R
efer
ence
de
velo
ped
by M
arch
201
0 In
itial
sur
vey
of s
take
hold
ers
and
info
rmat
ion
gath
erin
g by
Ju
ne 2
010
Dra
ft re
port
prod
uced
for
revi
ew b
y LI
WLM
AC
by
Stu
dy d
esig
n do
cum
ent
Con
sulta
nt/e
cono
mis
t re
crui
ted
Com
mitt
ee c
omm
ents
Fi
nal e
ndor
sed
repo
rt,
outli
ning
cos
ts a
nd b
enef
its
of w
ater
use
and
Cap
acity
and
acc
ess
to
info
rmat
ion
and
data
B
ias,
inco
nsis
tenc
ies,
and
S
econ
dary
dat
a so
urce
s
Prim
ary
data
sou
rces
pro
vide
re
pres
enta
tive
info
rmat
ion
with
out b
ias
and
abou
t wat
er
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), S
OP
AC
E
cono
mic
s A
dvis
er
30
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/Out
com
e K
ey In
dica
tors
M
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n A
ssum
ptio
ns/R
isks
R
espo
nsib
le
Part
ners
po
ssib
le e
xtra
ctio
n fe
e; a
nd
(d) p
ossi
ble
cost
sha
ring
arra
ngem
ents
(e.g
. pol
lute
r ve
rsus
ben
efic
iary
pay
s).
Sept
embe
r 201
0 Fi
nal r
epor
t pub
lishe
d an
d en
dors
ed b
y LI
WLM
AC b
y D
ecem
ber 2
010
man
agem
ent,
and
reco
mm
enda
tions
for p
ricin
g m
echa
nism
s an
d co
st
shar
ing
use
syst
em
Assu
mpt
ions
use
d in
ec
onom
ic a
naly
sis
are
clos
ely
alig
ned
to re
aliti
es o
f w
ater
use
and
man
agem
ent
syst
ems
in M
ajur
o
Com
pone
nt 3
: Dev
elop
men
t of a
Lau
ra In
tegr
ated
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Res
ourc
es M
anag
emen
t Pla
n 3.
1 Es
tabl
ishm
ent a
nd O
pera
tion
of a
Tec
hnic
al W
orki
ng
Gro
up o
f the
LIW
LMAC
to
deve
lop
a La
ura
Inte
grat
ed
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Res
ourc
es
Man
agem
ent P
lan
(LIW
LRM
P)
Term
s of
Ref
eren
ce a
nd
wor
k pr
ogra
mm
e de
velo
ped
by M
arch
201
1 W
orki
ng g
roup
mem
bers
id
entif
ied
with
agr
eed
mem
bers
hip
list b
y Ju
ne
2011
Term
s of
Ref
eren
ce
Wor
k pr
ogra
mm
e an
d tim
etab
le
Mem
bers
hip
list
Sum
mar
y re
port
of
LIW
LMAC
mee
ting
with
en
dors
emen
t of m
embe
rs
Min
utes
of
Avai
labl
e ex
perti
se in
the
LIW
LMAC
for i
nteg
rate
d m
anag
emen
t pla
n de
velo
pmen
t W
illing
ness
and
com
mitm
ent
of L
IWLM
AC m
embe
rs to
co
mm
it to
pla
n de
velo
pmen
t
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
LIW
LMAC
3.2
Agre
emen
t bet
wee
n an
d am
ongs
t wat
er re
late
d ag
enci
es a
nd fu
ndin
g bo
dies
(b
oth
Gov
ernm
ent a
nd
exte
rnal
) of p
riorit
y w
ater
pr
oble
ms
and
requ
ired
man
agem
ent i
nter
vent
ions
at
Laur
a, in
clud
ing
benc
hmar
king
of c
urre
nt a
nd
plan
ned
proj
ects
and
fin
anci
ng le
vels
.
Rou
nd-T
able
mee
ting
of
amon
gst w
ater
rela
ted
agen
cies
and
fund
ing
bodi
es
conv
ened
by
Sep
tem
ber
2011
Pr
iorit
y w
ater
pro
blem
s at
La
ura
iden
tifie
d Pr
iorit
y m
anag
emen
t in
terv
entio
ns a
gree
d by
D
ecem
ber 2
011,
incl
udin
g co
mm
itmen
ts to
sup
port
man
agem
ent p
lan
appr
oach
Rep
ort o
f Rou
nd-T
able
m
eetin
g Ag
reed
list
of p
riorit
y w
ater
pr
oble
ms
at L
aura
C
once
pt n
otes
on
prio
rity
man
agem
ent i
nter
vent
ions
re
quire
d fo
r int
egra
ted
wat
er
and
land
man
agem
ent a
t La
ura
Rep
rese
ntat
ives
of
gove
rnm
ent a
genc
ies
and
dono
rs fa
milia
r with
Lau
ra
wat
er is
sues
In
abilit
y of
age
ncie
s an
d fu
ndin
g bo
dies
to a
gree
on
prio
rity
actio
ns d
ue to
lim
ited
scie
ntifi
c an
d te
chni
cal
info
rmat
ion
avai
labl
e fo
r the
ar
ea
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
LIW
LMAC
3.3
Com
mun
ity fo
rum
mee
tings
to
agr
ee n
eeds
and
vis
ion
for
the
Laur
a co
mm
unity
for
inte
grat
ed w
ater
and
land
m
anag
emen
t at L
aura
, in
clud
ing
desi
red
man
agem
ent g
oals
, ob
ject
ives
, and
targ
eted
m
anag
emen
t act
ions
.
Com
mun
ity fo
rum
mee
tings
co
nven
ed to
Jun
e 20
13
Com
mun
ity n
eeds
and
vis
ion
agre
ed b
y co
mm
unity
re
pres
enta
tives
by
Augu
st
2011
C
omm
unity
asp
ects
of
man
agem
ent p
lan
deve
lope
d fo
r pre
sent
atio
n at
Rou
nd-
Sum
mar
y re
ports
of
com
mun
ity fo
rum
mee
tings
C
omm
unity
sta
tem
ent o
n ne
ed, v
isio
n, m
anag
emen
t go
als,
obj
ectiv
es, a
nd p
riorit
y m
anag
emen
t act
ions
Li
st o
f key
con
side
ratio
ns fo
r co
mm
unity
ele
men
ts o
f m
anag
emen
t pla
n
Cap
acity
of p
artic
ipan
ts in
co
mm
unity
foru
m to
co
ncep
tual
ise
broa
d ra
nge
of
issu
es in
pla
nnin
g in
tegr
ated
w
ater
and
land
man
agem
ent
at L
aura
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), L
IWLM
AC,
and
com
mun
ity
mem
bers
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/Out
com
e K
ey In
dica
tors
M
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n A
ssum
ptio
ns/R
isks
R
espo
nsib
le
Part
ners
Ta
ble
(see
3.2
) 3.
4 D
raft
Laur
a In
tegr
ated
Wat
er
and
Land
Res
ourc
es
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
incl
udin
g ta
rget
ed c
oste
d ac
tion
plan
an
d fin
anci
ng m
echa
nism
s pr
esen
ted
to L
aura
co
mm
unity
for c
omm
ent a
nd
revi
ewed
by
and
endo
rsed
by
LIW
LMAC
for s
ubm
issi
on
to c
abin
et
Firs
t dra
ft m
anag
emen
t pla
n de
velo
ped
for c
omm
ent f
rom
go
vern
men
t, pr
ivat
e se
ctor
, co
mm
unity
, NG
O a
nd o
ther
ci
vil s
ocie
ty g
roup
s by
D
ecem
ber 2
012
Laur
a st
akeh
olde
r w
orks
hop(
s) to
pre
sent
and
di
scus
s m
anag
emen
t pla
n an
d ta
rget
ed c
oste
d ac
tion
plan
(Jan
uary
-Mar
ch 2
012)
M
anag
emen
t pla
n su
bmitt
ed
to c
abin
et b
y Ju
ne 2
013
Firs
t dra
ft m
anag
emen
t pla
n St
akeh
olde
r com
men
ts
Sum
mar
y re
ports
of
stak
ehol
der w
orks
hops
in
clud
ing
parti
cipa
nt li
sts
Fina
l man
agem
ent p
lan
subm
itted
to C
abin
et
Willi
ngne
ss a
nd c
omm
itmen
t of
sta
keho
lder
s to
con
tribu
te
to
Abili
ty to
reac
h ag
reem
ent
betw
een
gove
rnm
ent,
land
owne
rs, a
nd o
ther
st
akeh
olde
rs o
n th
e fin
anci
ng
of m
anag
emen
t pla
n im
plem
enta
tion
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
LIW
LMAC
3.5
Laur
a In
tegr
ated
Wat
er a
nd
Land
Res
ourc
es
Man
agem
ent P
lan
and
Actio
n P
lan
subm
itted
for
Cab
inet
end
orse
men
t
Firs
t dra
ft ac
tion
plan
for
com
mun
ity c
onsu
ltatio
n by
M
arch
201
3 Ac
tion
plan
agr
eed
and
endo
rsed
by
LIW
LMAC
and
su
bmitt
ed to
cab
inet
by
June
20
13
Firs
t dra
ft m
anag
emen
t pla
n St
akeh
olde
r com
men
ts
Sum
mar
y re
ports
of
stak
ehol
der w
orks
hops
in
clud
ing
parti
cipa
nt li
sts
Fina
l man
agem
ent p
lan
subm
itted
to C
abin
et
Willi
ngne
ss a
nd c
omm
itmen
t of
sta
keho
lder
s to
con
tribu
te
to
Abili
ty to
reac
h ag
reem
ent
betw
een
gove
rnm
ent,
land
owne
rs, a
nd o
ther
st
akeh
olde
rs o
n th
e fin
anci
ng
of m
anag
emen
t pla
n im
plem
enta
tion
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
LIW
LMAC
C
ompo
nent
4: T
arge
ted
Stre
ss R
educ
tion
Dem
onst
ratio
ns fo
r the
Lau
ra W
ater
Len
s
Sub-
Com
pone
nt 4
.1 –
Red
ucin
g St
ress
from
Ove
rload
ed a
nd L
eaki
ng S
eptic
Sys
tem
s at
Lau
ra
4.1.
1 D
evel
opm
ent o
f a s
eptic
m
onito
ring,
col
lect
ion,
and
di
spos
al p
rogr
am to
: (a)
m
onito
r sew
age
leve
ls o
f se
ptic
tank
s at
Lau
ra; a
nd (b
) in
itiat
e tim
ely
sew
age
colle
ctio
n fro
m o
verlo
aded
an
d le
akin
g se
ptic
sys
tem
s an
d su
bseq
uent
dis
posa
l us
ing
Maj
uro’
s pu
blic
sew
er
syst
em. [
Activ
ity 2
.2 to
Land
owne
r agr
eem
ent o
n sy
stem
for m
onito
ring
sept
ic
stat
us b
y D
ecem
ber 2
011
Rem
edia
tion
actio
ns
incl
udin
g pu
mpi
ng o
f ov
erlo
aded
and
leak
ing
sept
ics
unde
rway
by
June
20
12
All o
verlo
aded
and
leak
ing
sept
ics
clea
n an
d op
erat
iona
l by
Jun
e 20
13
Tech
nica
l rep
ort a
nd
educ
atio
n m
ater
ials
on
sept
ic
mon
itorin
g, c
olle
ctio
n, a
nd
disp
osal
sys
tem
N
umbe
r of c
lean
sep
tic
syst
ems
Volu
me
of s
eptic
was
te
colle
cted
and
saf
ely
disp
osed
Willi
ngne
ss a
nd a
gree
men
t of
land
owne
rs to
par
ticip
ate
in s
eptic
mon
itorin
g Av
aila
bilit
y of
sep
tic p
ump
truck
Ab
ility
of M
ajur
o to
wn
sew
age
syst
em to
cop
e w
ith
sept
ic w
aste
dis
posa
l Av
aila
ble
hum
an re
sour
ces
for s
eptic
rem
edia
tion
wor
ks
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), L
IWLM
AC,
Maj
uro
Wat
er a
nd
Sew
age
Com
pany
(N
WSC
)
31
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/Out
com
e K
ey In
dica
tors
M
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n A
ssum
ptio
ns/R
isks
R
espo
nsib
le
Part
ners
Ta
ble
(see
3.2
) 3.
4 D
raft
Laur
a In
tegr
ated
Wat
er
and
Land
Res
ourc
es
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
incl
udin
g ta
rget
ed c
oste
d ac
tion
plan
an
d fin
anci
ng m
echa
nism
s pr
esen
ted
to L
aura
co
mm
unity
for c
omm
ent a
nd
revi
ewed
by
and
endo
rsed
by
LIW
LMAC
for s
ubm
issi
on
to c
abin
et
Firs
t dra
ft m
anag
emen
t pla
n de
velo
ped
for c
omm
ent f
rom
go
vern
men
t, pr
ivat
e se
ctor
, co
mm
unity
, NG
O a
nd o
ther
ci
vil s
ocie
ty g
roup
s by
D
ecem
ber 2
012
Laur
a st
akeh
olde
r w
orks
hop(
s) to
pre
sent
and
di
scus
s m
anag
emen
t pla
n an
d ta
rget
ed c
oste
d ac
tion
plan
(Jan
uary
-Mar
ch 2
012)
M
anag
emen
t pla
n su
bmitt
ed
to c
abin
et b
y Ju
ne 2
013
Firs
t dra
ft m
anag
emen
t pla
n St
akeh
olde
r com
men
ts
Sum
mar
y re
ports
of
stak
ehol
der w
orks
hops
in
clud
ing
parti
cipa
nt li
sts
Fina
l man
agem
ent p
lan
subm
itted
to C
abin
et
Willi
ngne
ss a
nd c
omm
itmen
t of
sta
keho
lder
s to
con
tribu
te
to
Abili
ty to
reac
h ag
reem
ent
betw
een
gove
rnm
ent,
land
owne
rs, a
nd o
ther
st
akeh
olde
rs o
n th
e fin
anci
ng
of m
anag
emen
t pla
n im
plem
enta
tion
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
LIW
LMAC
3.5
Laur
a In
tegr
ated
Wat
er a
nd
Land
Res
ourc
es
Man
agem
ent P
lan
and
Actio
n P
lan
subm
itted
for
Cab
inet
end
orse
men
t
Firs
t dra
ft ac
tion
plan
for
com
mun
ity c
onsu
ltatio
n by
M
arch
201
3 Ac
tion
plan
agr
eed
and
endo
rsed
by
LIW
LMAC
and
su
bmitt
ed to
cab
inet
by
June
20
13
Firs
t dra
ft m
anag
emen
t pla
n St
akeh
olde
r com
men
ts
Sum
mar
y re
ports
of
stak
ehol
der w
orks
hops
in
clud
ing
parti
cipa
nt li
sts
Fina
l man
agem
ent p
lan
subm
itted
to C
abin
et
Willi
ngne
ss a
nd c
omm
itmen
t of
sta
keho
lder
s to
con
tribu
te
to
Abili
ty to
reac
h ag
reem
ent
betw
een
gove
rnm
ent,
land
owne
rs, a
nd o
ther
st
akeh
olde
rs o
n th
e fin
anci
ng
of m
anag
emen
t pla
n im
plem
enta
tion
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
LIW
LMAC
C
ompo
nent
4: T
arge
ted
Stre
ss R
educ
tion
Dem
onst
ratio
ns fo
r the
Lau
ra W
ater
Len
s
Sub-
Com
pone
nt 4
.1 –
Red
ucin
g St
ress
from
Ove
rload
ed a
nd L
eaki
ng S
eptic
Sys
tem
s at
Lau
ra
4.1.
1 D
evel
opm
ent o
f a s
eptic
m
onito
ring,
col
lect
ion,
and
di
spos
al p
rogr
am to
: (a)
m
onito
r sew
age
leve
ls o
f se
ptic
tank
s at
Lau
ra; a
nd (b
) in
itiat
e tim
ely
sew
age
colle
ctio
n fro
m o
verlo
aded
an
d le
akin
g se
ptic
sys
tem
s an
d su
bseq
uent
dis
posa
l us
ing
Maj
uro’
s pu
blic
sew
er
syst
em. [
Activ
ity 2
.2 to
Land
owne
r agr
eem
ent o
n sy
stem
for m
onito
ring
sept
ic
stat
us b
y D
ecem
ber 2
011
Rem
edia
tion
actio
ns
incl
udin
g pu
mpi
ng o
f ov
erlo
aded
and
leak
ing
sept
ics
unde
rway
by
June
20
12
All o
verlo
aded
and
leak
ing
sept
ics
clea
n an
d op
erat
iona
l by
Jun
e 20
13
Tech
nica
l rep
ort a
nd
educ
atio
n m
ater
ials
on
sept
ic
mon
itorin
g, c
olle
ctio
n, a
nd
disp
osal
sys
tem
N
umbe
r of c
lean
sep
tic
syst
ems
Volu
me
of s
eptic
was
te
colle
cted
and
saf
ely
disp
osed
Willi
ngne
ss a
nd a
gree
men
t of
land
owne
rs to
par
ticip
ate
in s
eptic
mon
itorin
g Av
aila
bilit
y of
sep
tic p
ump
truck
Ab
ility
of M
ajur
o to
wn
sew
age
syst
em to
cop
e w
ith
sept
ic w
aste
dis
posa
l Av
aila
ble
hum
an re
sour
ces
for s
eptic
rem
edia
tion
wor
ks
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), L
IWLM
AC,
Maj
uro
Wat
er a
nd
Sew
age
Com
pany
(N
WSC
)
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/O
utco
me
Key
Ind
icat
ors
Mea
ns o
f V
erifi
catio
n
Ass
umpt
ion
s/R
isks
R
espo
nsib
le
Par
tner
s pr
ovid
e ba
selin
e in
form
atio
n]
Rel
iabl
e co
st e
stim
ate
of
sept
ic m
aint
enan
ce a
nd
annu
al c
olle
ctio
n vo
lum
es
agre
ed b
y LI
WLM
AC
by
Mar
ch 2
013
4.1.
2 C
ompo
stin
g to
ilet d
esig
ned
and
oper
atio
nal a
t cen
tral
La
ura
loca
tion,
incl
udin
g:
surv
ey o
f com
mun
ity
perc
eptio
ns; p
refe
rred
des
ign
feat
ures
; and
ope
ratio
nal
cons
ider
atio
ns.
Rep
ort o
f com
mun
ity
perc
eptio
ns a
nd d
esire
d de
sign
feat
ure
surv
ey b
y D
ecem
ber
2011
S
elec
tion
and
inst
alla
tion
of
one
dem
onst
ratio
n co
mpo
stin
g to
ilet b
y M
arch
20
12
Com
mun
ity d
emon
stra
tion
of
com
post
ing
toile
t and
use
of
com
post
by
June
201
3
Tec
hnic
al r
epor
t of s
urve
y re
sults
T
echn
ical
not
e on
com
mun
ity
pref
erre
d de
sign
(s)
for
com
post
ing
toile
t C
ompo
stin
g to
ilet o
pera
tiona
l by
Jun
e 20
13
Will
ingn
ess
of c
omm
unity
m
embe
rs to
par
ticip
ate
in
surv
ey
Sur
vey
resu
lts p
rovi
de
repr
esen
tativ
e in
form
atio
n an
d da
ta fo
r se
tting
rea
listic
ba
selin
es
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IW
RM
Pro
ject
M
anag
emen
t Uni
t (R
MI)
, and
LI
WLM
AC
S
ub-C
ompo
nent
4.2
– R
educ
ing
Str
ess
from
Dom
esti
c S
olid
Was
te L
each
ate
Pol
lutio
n at
Lau
ra
4.2.
1 B
ased
on
resu
lts o
f 2.2
de
velo
p co
mm
unity
-bas
ed
proj
ect f
or s
olid
dom
estic
w
aste
man
agem
ent a
t Lau
ra
Com
mun
ity a
gree
men
t on
proj
ect c
once
pt fo
r do
mes
tic
solid
was
te d
emon
stra
tion
by
Dec
embe
r 20
11
Com
mun
ity b
ased
pro
ject
ex
ecut
ed b
y D
ecem
ber
2012
Rep
ort o
f com
mun
ity
mee
tings
and
pro
ject
con
cept
do
cum
ent
Pro
ject
pro
posa
l and
ev
alua
tions
Will
ingn
ess
and
com
mitm
ent
of la
ndow
ners
and
co
mm
unity
mem
bers
to
sust
aina
ble
was
te
man
agem
ent
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IW
RM
Pro
ject
M
anag
emen
t Uni
t (R
MI)
, and
LI
WLM
AC
4.2.
2 C
omm
unity
sur
vey
of
num
bers
, typ
es, a
nd s
uita
ble
loca
tions
for
solid
was
te b
ins
and
disp
osal
are
as
Tec
hnic
al r
epor
t of s
urve
y by
Ju
ne 2
011
Tec
hnic
al r
epor
t M
ap o
f sui
tabl
e lo
catio
ns fo
r bi
ns a
nd d
ispo
sal a
reas
Sur
vey
resp
onse
s re
flect
co
mm
unity
nee
ds
RM
IEP
A a
nd G
EF
IW
RM
Pro
ject
M
anag
emen
t Uni
t (R
MI)
4.
2.3
Dev
elop
men
t of e
duca
tion
mat
eria
ls a
nd a
ctiv
ities
to
info
rm th
e co
mm
unity
on
dom
estic
was
te m
anag
emen
t (li
nk to
com
pone
nt 5
).
Edu
catio
n m
ater
ials
pr
oduc
ed b
y M
arch
201
2 M
ater
ials
dis
trib
uted
to a
ll La
ura
land
owne
rs a
nd
disp
laye
d at
pro
min
ent
loca
tions
in L
aura
(A
pril
2012
–
Dec
embe
r 20
13)
Pos
ters
, bro
chur
es, v
ideo
s et
c pr
oduc
ed
Num
ber
of e
duca
tion
pack
ages
pro
duce
d an
d di
strib
uted
Ava
ilabl
e ex
pert
ise
for
prod
uctio
n of
com
mun
ity
educ
atio
n an
d aw
aren
ess
mat
eria
ls
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IW
RM
Pro
ject
M
anag
emen
t Uni
t (R
MI)
, Mar
shal
l Is
land
s C
onse
rvat
ion
Soc
iety
(M
ICS
)
Sub
-Com
pone
nt 4
.3 –
Bui
ldin
g C
apac
ity o
f P
ig F
arm
ers
to R
educ
e S
tres
s on
the
Lau
ra W
ater
Len
s 4.
3.1
Iden
tific
atio
n of
prio
rity
pig
Pig
farm
site
s id
entif
ied
by
Map
dep
ictin
g pi
gger
y si
tes
Site
s se
lect
ed a
re
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
32
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/Out
com
e K
ey In
dica
tors
M
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n A
ssum
ptio
ns/R
isks
R
espo
nsib
le
Part
ners
fa
rms
for i
nvol
vem
ent i
n tri
al,
pref
erab
ly fa
rms
loca
ted
in
low
-lyin
g co
asta
l lan
ds
adja
cent
to w
ater
lens
Dec
embe
r 201
1 Ag
reem
ent o
f lan
dow
ners
/ fa
rmer
s to
par
ticip
ate
in p
ilot
activ
ity
to b
e us
ed in
tria
l act
ivity
M
inut
es o
f mee
tings
with
la
ndow
ners
rega
rdin
g th
eir
parti
cipa
tion
in tr
ial
repr
esen
tativ
e of
prio
rity
area
s fo
r act
ion
Pig
farm
er w
illin
g to
be
invo
lved
in p
ilot a
ctiv
ity
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
land
owne
rs
4.3.
2 Id
entif
icat
ion
and
deve
lopm
ent o
f tec
hniq
ues
for t
he u
se o
f coc
onut
hus
k in
dry
litte
r was
te
man
agem
ent a
t sel
ecte
d pi
gger
ies,
spe
cific
ally
to
prod
uce
com
post
for m
arke
t ga
rden
ferti
liser
Com
mun
ity tr
aini
ng
wor
ksho
p co
nven
ed b
y Ju
ne
2012
Pi
g fa
rmer
usi
ng w
aste
and
sh
redd
ed c
ocon
ut h
usk
to
prod
uce
com
post
by
Sept
embe
r 201
2 M
etho
d as
sess
ed fo
r re
plic
atio
n/up
take
by
othe
r pi
gger
ies
by M
arch
201
3 C
oope
ratio
n w
ith o
ther
pr
ojec
ts a
s ap
prop
riate
R
elia
ble
cost
est
imat
es o
f co
mpo
st p
rodu
ctio
n by
M
arch
201
3
Com
mun
ity tr
aini
ng m
ater
ials
Su
mm
ary
repo
rt of
co
mm
unity
trai
ning
w
orks
hop,
incl
udin
g au
dio-
visu
al p
rese
ntat
ions
N
umbe
r of p
ig fa
rmer
s tri
allin
g co
conu
t hus
k as
dry
lit
ter f
or c
ompo
st p
rodu
ctio
n Te
chni
cal r
epor
t det
ailin
g as
sess
men
t of t
he m
etho
d an
d re
liabl
e co
st e
stim
ates
Willi
ngne
ss o
f lan
dow
ners
to
trial
new
pig
was
te
man
agem
ent t
echn
ique
s an
d pa
rtici
pate
in tr
aini
ng e
vent
s Av
aila
bilit
y of
coc
onut
hus
k
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
land
owne
rs
4.3.
3 Es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f com
mun
al
com
post
ing
site
for
prod
uctio
n of
pig
was
te
ferti
liser
Com
mun
al c
ompo
stin
g si
te
esta
blis
hed
and
in o
pera
tion,
an
d fo
llow
ing
best
pra
ctic
es
for w
aste
han
dlin
g by
D
ecem
ber 2
012
Com
post
ing
site
ope
ratin
g Vo
lum
e of
was
te p
roce
ssed
an
d co
mpo
st p
rodu
ced
Avai
labi
lity
of la
nd
Best
was
te m
anag
emen
t pr
actic
es e
nsur
e co
mpo
st
prod
uctio
n do
es n
ot im
pact
on
Lau
ra le
ns w
ater
qua
lity
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
land
owne
rs
C
ompo
nent
5: E
nhan
cing
Aw
aren
ess
and
Und
erst
andi
ng o
f the
Lau
ra W
ater
Len
s
Sub-
Com
pone
nt 5
.1: P
ublic
Aw
aren
ess
5.1.
1 La
ura
Wat
er L
ens
Lear
ning
C
ente
r in
the
Laur
a Ar
ea to
as
sist
with
pro
mot
ion
of
dem
onst
ratio
n pr
ojec
t and
di
ssem
inat
ion
of in
form
atio
n m
ater
ials
Com
mun
ity s
uppo
rt fo
r es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f Cen
ter
Lear
ning
Cen
ter l
ocat
ion
agre
ed, l
aunc
hed,
and
op
erat
iona
l by
June
201
1
Min
utes
of L
IWLM
AC
mee
tings
agr
eein
g to
loca
tion
Lear
ning
Cen
ter o
pera
tiona
l N
umbe
r of d
ays
open
and
st
affe
d N
umbe
r of v
isito
rs
Agr
eem
ent a
nd s
uppo
rt of
LI
WLM
AC fo
r Lea
rnin
g C
ente
r Av
aila
bilit
y an
d co
st o
f pr
emis
es
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
LIW
LMAC
5.1.
2 Ex
hibi
tion
mat
eria
ls fo
r the
Le
arni
ng C
ente
r, in
clud
ing:
le
arni
ng d
ispl
ays
(e.g
. po
ster
s), i
nter
activ
e
Lear
ning
Cen
ter c
onta
inin
g ex
hibi
tion
mat
eria
ls (o
ngoi
ng
June
201
1-D
ecem
ber 2
013)
Le
arni
ng d
ispl
ays
depi
ctin
g
Num
ber o
f Lau
ra W
ater
Len
s m
anag
emen
t iss
ues
addr
esse
d by
lear
ning
di
spla
ys
Avai
labl
e ex
perti
se to
pr
oduc
e en
gagi
ng a
nd
info
rmat
ive
exhi
bitio
n m
ater
ials
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), L
IWLM
AC,
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/Out
com
e K
ey In
dica
tors
M
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n A
ssum
ptio
ns/R
isks
R
espo
nsib
le
Part
ners
da
taba
se/D
VD-R
OM
of
info
rmat
ion
and
data
rela
ting
to L
aura
wat
er le
ns, a
nd
audi
o-vi
sual
mat
eria
ls (e
.g.
vide
os).
prog
ress
and
resu
lts o
f st
ress
redu
ctio
n de
mo
activ
ities
on
disp
lay
from
Ju
ne 2
011
and
upda
ted
regu
larly
In
tera
ctiv
e D
VD
-RO
M o
f La
ura
Wat
er L
ens
info
rmat
ion
prod
uced
by
June
201
2
Freq
uenc
y at
whi
ch
info
rmat
ion
from
stre
ss
redu
ctio
n de
mon
stra
tions
are
di
spla
yed
Num
ber o
f req
uest
s fo
r co
pies
of l
earn
ing
mat
eria
ls,
DVD
-RO
M, a
udio
-vis
ual
prod
ucts
Cos
ts o
f exh
ibiti
on m
ater
ial
prod
uctio
n an
d re
quire
d te
chno
logy
(prin
ting
etc)
on
Maj
uro
Ato
ll St
ress
redu
ctio
n de
mo
activ
ities
pro
vide
tang
ible
ex
ampl
es o
f goo
d pr
actic
es
in in
tegr
ated
wat
er a
nd la
nd
man
agem
ent
MIC
S, a
nd
stud
ent v
olun
teer
s
5.1.
3 Pr
omot
ion
of L
earn
ing
Cen
ter r
ole
via
loca
l rad
io,
loca
l and
regi
onal
tele
visi
on
and
prin
t med
ia, a
nd a
pr
ogra
mm
e of
vis
its b
y sc
hool
s an
d ot
her c
ivil
soci
ety
grou
ps
Rad
io, t
elev
isio
n, a
nd
new
spap
er n
ews
item
s on
C
ente
r (on
goin
g 20
11-2
013)
Pr
ogra
mm
e of
vis
its b
y sc
hool
s an
d ot
her g
roup
s un
derw
ay b
y M
arch
201
2
Num
ber o
f rad
io, t
elev
isio
n,
and
new
spap
er n
ews
item
s N
umbe
r of g
roup
s vi
sits
and
to
tal n
umbe
r of v
isito
rs
Num
ber o
f req
uest
s to
vis
it C
ente
r or f
or in
form
atio
n
Lear
ning
Cen
ter e
xhib
ition
s an
d ac
tiviti
es c
onsi
dere
d ne
wsw
orth
y by
loca
l new
s In
tere
st o
f sch
ools
and
oth
er
grou
ps in
Lau
ra w
ater
lens
is
sues
RM
IEP
A an
d G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I)
5.1.
4 N
etw
ork
of lo
cal j
ourn
alis
ts
and
gove
rnm
ent
com
mun
icat
ions
sta
ff to
or
gani
se te
levi
sion
and
radi
o br
oadc
asts
and
new
s ar
ticle
s ab
out w
ater
con
serv
atio
n an
d st
ress
redu
ctio
n de
mon
stra
tion
activ
ities
Mee
ting(
s) o
f loc
al jo
urna
lists
an
d go
vern
men
t co
mm
unic
atio
ns s
taff
conv
ened
by
Dec
embe
r 201
1 In
form
atio
n an
d pr
ess
rele
ases
on
dem
onst
ratio
n pr
ojec
t act
iviti
es d
istri
bute
d to
net
wor
k of
jour
nalis
ts o
n a
quar
terly
bas
is
Min
utes
of m
eetin
g(s)
with
lo
cal j
ourn
alis
ts a
nd
com
mun
icat
ions
sta
ff N
umbe
r of i
nfor
mat
ion
pack
ages
and
pre
ss re
leas
es
issu
ed to
net
wor
k N
umbe
r of n
ews
item
s fro
m
pres
s re
leas
es
Inte
rest
and
sup
port
amon
gst
loca
l jou
rnal
ists
for w
ater
re
sour
ce m
anag
emen
t and
sa
nita
tion
issu
es o
n M
ajur
o Av
aila
bilit
y of
jour
nalis
ts to
m
eet a
nd p
lan
wat
er a
nd
sani
tatio
n co
mm
unic
atio
ns
actio
ns
RM
IEP
A an
d G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I)
5.1.
5 La
ura
Wat
er L
ens
web
site
ba
sed
on O
pen
Sour
ce
Con
tent
Man
agem
ent
Sys
tem
Sof
twar
e (e
.g.
Joom
la) t
o ac
t as
a ce
ntra
l re
posi
tory
of i
nfor
mat
ion
and
data
rela
ting
to in
tegr
ated
w
ater
and
land
man
agem
ent
at L
aura
Laur
a W
ater
Len
s w
ebsi
te
oper
atio
nal b
y M
arch
201
1 W
ebsi
te c
onta
inin
g al
l pro
ject
re
late
d do
cum
ents
, in
form
atio
n, d
ata,
and
aud
io-
visu
al o
utpu
ts (o
ngoi
ng)
Web
site
acc
essi
ble
at
http
://w
ww
.laur
awat
er.o
rg
Num
ber o
f pro
ject
rela
ted
docu
men
ts, n
ews
stor
ies,
ph
otog
raph
s, a
nd o
ther
ou
tput
s ac
cess
ible
onl
ine
Num
ber o
f web
site
s w
ith
links
to L
aura
pro
ject
site
G
oogl
e ra
nk fo
r sea
rch
on
“Lau
ra W
ater
Len
s”
Acce
ssib
ility
to e
xper
tise
for
onlin
e C
onte
nt M
anag
emen
t S
yste
m s
etup
and
m
anag
emen
t Lo
cal I
nter
net c
onne
ctio
n sp
eed
and
relia
bilit
y en
able
s ef
ficie
nt u
ploa
ding
of p
roje
ct
info
rmat
ion
and
outp
uts
GEF
IWR
M
Proj
ect
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I)
5.1.
6 El
ectro
nic
diss
emin
atio
n of
a
Proj
ect E
-New
slet
ter s
ent
Cop
ies
of e
-new
slet
ter
Qua
rterly
e-n
ewsl
ette
r is
Proj
ect
33
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/Out
com
e K
ey In
dica
tors
M
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n A
ssum
ptio
ns/R
isks
R
espo
nsib
le
Part
ners
da
taba
se/D
VD-R
OM
of
info
rmat
ion
and
data
rela
ting
to L
aura
wat
er le
ns, a
nd
audi
o-vi
sual
mat
eria
ls (e
.g.
vide
os).
prog
ress
and
resu
lts o
f st
ress
redu
ctio
n de
mo
activ
ities
on
disp
lay
from
Ju
ne 2
011
and
upda
ted
regu
larly
In
tera
ctiv
e D
VD
-RO
M o
f La
ura
Wat
er L
ens
info
rmat
ion
prod
uced
by
June
201
2
Freq
uenc
y at
whi
ch
info
rmat
ion
from
stre
ss
redu
ctio
n de
mon
stra
tions
are
di
spla
yed
Num
ber o
f req
uest
s fo
r co
pies
of l
earn
ing
mat
eria
ls,
DVD
-RO
M, a
udio
-vis
ual
prod
ucts
Cos
ts o
f exh
ibiti
on m
ater
ial
prod
uctio
n an
d re
quire
d te
chno
logy
(prin
ting
etc)
on
Maj
uro
Ato
ll St
ress
redu
ctio
n de
mo
activ
ities
pro
vide
tang
ible
ex
ampl
es o
f goo
d pr
actic
es
in in
tegr
ated
wat
er a
nd la
nd
man
agem
ent
MIC
S, a
nd
stud
ent v
olun
teer
s
5.1.
3 Pr
omot
ion
of L
earn
ing
Cen
ter r
ole
via
loca
l rad
io,
loca
l and
regi
onal
tele
visi
on
and
prin
t med
ia, a
nd a
pr
ogra
mm
e of
vis
its b
y sc
hool
s an
d ot
her c
ivil
soci
ety
grou
ps
Rad
io, t
elev
isio
n, a
nd
new
spap
er n
ews
item
s on
C
ente
r (on
goin
g 20
11-2
013)
Pr
ogra
mm
e of
vis
its b
y sc
hool
s an
d ot
her g
roup
s un
derw
ay b
y M
arch
201
2
Num
ber o
f rad
io, t
elev
isio
n,
and
new
spap
er n
ews
item
s N
umbe
r of g
roup
s vi
sits
and
to
tal n
umbe
r of v
isito
rs
Num
ber o
f req
uest
s to
vis
it C
ente
r or f
or in
form
atio
n
Lear
ning
Cen
ter e
xhib
ition
s an
d ac
tiviti
es c
onsi
dere
d ne
wsw
orth
y by
loca
l new
s In
tere
st o
f sch
ools
and
oth
er
grou
ps in
Lau
ra w
ater
lens
is
sues
RM
IEP
A an
d G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I)
5.1.
4 N
etw
ork
of lo
cal j
ourn
alis
ts
and
gove
rnm
ent
com
mun
icat
ions
sta
ff to
or
gani
se te
levi
sion
and
radi
o br
oadc
asts
and
new
s ar
ticle
s ab
out w
ater
con
serv
atio
n an
d st
ress
redu
ctio
n de
mon
stra
tion
activ
ities
Mee
ting(
s) o
f loc
al jo
urna
lists
an
d go
vern
men
t co
mm
unic
atio
ns s
taff
conv
ened
by
Dec
embe
r 201
1 In
form
atio
n an
d pr
ess
rele
ases
on
dem
onst
ratio
n pr
ojec
t act
iviti
es d
istri
bute
d to
net
wor
k of
jour
nalis
ts o
n a
quar
terly
bas
is
Min
utes
of m
eetin
g(s)
with
lo
cal j
ourn
alis
ts a
nd
com
mun
icat
ions
sta
ff N
umbe
r of i
nfor
mat
ion
pack
ages
and
pre
ss re
leas
es
issu
ed to
net
wor
k N
umbe
r of n
ews
item
s fro
m
pres
s re
leas
es
Inte
rest
and
sup
port
amon
gst
loca
l jou
rnal
ists
for w
ater
re
sour
ce m
anag
emen
t and
sa
nita
tion
issu
es o
n M
ajur
o Av
aila
bilit
y of
jour
nalis
ts to
m
eet a
nd p
lan
wat
er a
nd
sani
tatio
n co
mm
unic
atio
ns
actio
ns
RM
IEP
A an
d G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I)
5.1.
5 La
ura
Wat
er L
ens
web
site
ba
sed
on O
pen
Sour
ce
Con
tent
Man
agem
ent
Sys
tem
Sof
twar
e (e
.g.
Joom
la) t
o ac
t as
a ce
ntra
l re
posi
tory
of i
nfor
mat
ion
and
data
rela
ting
to in
tegr
ated
w
ater
and
land
man
agem
ent
at L
aura
Laur
a W
ater
Len
s w
ebsi
te
oper
atio
nal b
y M
arch
201
1 W
ebsi
te c
onta
inin
g al
l pro
ject
re
late
d do
cum
ents
, in
form
atio
n, d
ata,
and
aud
io-
visu
al o
utpu
ts (o
ngoi
ng)
Web
site
acc
essi
ble
at
http
://w
ww
.laur
awat
er.o
rg
Num
ber o
f pro
ject
rela
ted
docu
men
ts, n
ews
stor
ies,
ph
otog
raph
s, a
nd o
ther
ou
tput
s ac
cess
ible
onl
ine
Num
ber o
f web
site
s w
ith
links
to L
aura
pro
ject
site
G
oogl
e ra
nk fo
r sea
rch
on
“Lau
ra W
ater
Len
s”
Acce
ssib
ility
to e
xper
tise
for
onlin
e C
onte
nt M
anag
emen
t S
yste
m s
etup
and
m
anag
emen
t Lo
cal I
nter
net c
onne
ctio
n sp
eed
and
relia
bilit
y en
able
s ef
ficie
nt u
ploa
ding
of p
roje
ct
info
rmat
ion
and
outp
uts
GEF
IWR
M
Proj
ect
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I)
5.1.
6 El
ectro
nic
diss
emin
atio
n of
a
Proj
ect E
-New
slet
ter s
ent
Cop
ies
of e
-new
slet
ter
Qua
rterly
e-n
ewsl
ette
r is
Proj
ect
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/Out
com
e K
ey In
dica
tors
M
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n
Ass
umpt
ions
/Ris
ks
Res
pons
ible
P
artn
ers
quar
terly
dem
onst
ratio
n pr
ojec
t new
slet
ter
quar
terly
to p
roje
ct
stak
ehol
ders
Li
st o
f ind
ivid
uals
the
e-ne
wsl
ette
r is
sen
t to
suffi
cien
tly r
egul
ar
Man
agem
ent U
nit
S
ub-C
ompo
nent
5.2
: Tra
inin
g an
d E
duca
tion
5.2.
1 T
rain
ing
need
s as
sess
men
t an
d pr
epar
atio
n of
a tr
aini
ng
prog
ram
me
targ
etin
g go
vern
men
t offi
cers
and
lo
cal c
omm
uniti
es, i
nclu
ding
, id
entif
icat
ion
of n
eeds
for
spec
ific
trai
ning
in a
reas
su
ch a
s sa
nita
tion,
co
mpo
stin
g to
ilets
etc
.
Res
ults
of t
rain
ing
need
s as
sess
men
t gen
erat
ed b
y D
ecem
ber
2010
T
rain
ing
prog
ram
me
targ
et
audi
ence
, top
ics,
del
iver
y m
ode,
and
tim
etab
le a
gree
d by
LIW
LMA
C b
y M
arch
201
1
Rep
ort o
f tra
inin
g ne
eds
asse
ssm
ent
Tra
inin
g pr
ogra
mm
e re
port
, in
clud
ing
list o
f ind
ivid
uals
to
part
icip
ate,
topi
cs, d
eliv
ery
mod
e an
d tim
etab
le
Ava
ilabi
lity
of tr
aini
ng n
eeds
as
sess
men
t and
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g ex
pert
ise
Ava
ilabi
lity
of g
over
nmen
t of
ficer
s an
d co
mm
unity
m
embe
rs to
par
ticip
ate
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IW
RM
Pro
ject
M
anag
emen
t Uni
t (R
MI)
, and
LI
WLM
AC
5.2.
2 Im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e tr
aini
ng p
rogr
amm
e at
the
com
mun
ity
leve
l. It
is e
nvis
aged
that
trai
ning
ne
eds
may
incl
ude
but n
ot
be li
mite
d to
: prin
cipl
es a
nd
prac
tice
of w
ater
res
ourc
e m
anag
emen
t; sa
nita
tion
and
sust
aina
ble
solid
was
te
disp
osal
met
hods
; sep
tic
mai
nten
ance
and
re
med
iatio
n te
chni
ques
; w
ater
qua
lity
mon
itorin
g; a
nd
reso
urce
use
zon
ing.
Tra
inin
g co
nduc
ted
as
plan
ned
at 5
.2.1
dur
ing
perio
d A
pril
2011
–
Dec
embe
r 20
12
Tra
inin
g m
ater
ials
and
su
mm
arie
s lo
aded
to L
aura
pr
ojec
t web
site
with
in 2
w
eeks
of t
rain
ing
activ
ity
com
plet
ion
Sum
mar
ies
of a
ll tr
aini
ng
even
ts in
clud
ed in
qua
rter
ly
elec
tron
ic n
ewsl
ette
rs
Sur
vey
to m
easu
re s
kill
deve
lopm
ent (
ongo
ing
Apr
il 20
11 -
Mar
ch 2
013)
Num
ber
of tr
aini
ng e
vent
s N
umbe
r of
com
mun
ity
mem
bers
invo
lved
N
umbe
r of
trai
ning
mat
eria
ls
prod
uced
and
acc
essi
ble
on
the
proj
ect w
ebsi
te
Num
ber
of tr
aini
ng e
vent
su
mm
ary
repo
rts
and
thei
r in
clus
ion
in th
e qu
arte
rly e
-ne
wsl
ette
r R
esul
ts o
f ski
ll de
velo
pmen
t su
rvey
Ava
ilabi
lity
and
inte
rest
of
com
mun
ity m
embe
rs to
pa
rtic
ipat
e in
trai
ning
ac
tiviti
es
Ava
ilabl
e ex
pert
ise
to
deve
lop
and
deliv
er tr
aini
ng
mat
eria
ls to
add
ress
prio
rity
need
s fo
r co
mm
unity
m
embe
rs
Ski
ll de
velo
pmen
t sur
vey
prov
ides
rea
listic
bas
elin
es
and
mea
sure
s of
im
prov
emen
t
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IW
RM
Pro
ject
M
anag
emen
t Uni
t (R
MI)
, and
LI
WLM
AC
5.2.
3 Im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e ta
rget
ed tr
aini
ng p
rogr
amm
e fo
r go
vern
men
t age
ncie
s an
d pe
rson
nel.
It is
en
visa
ged
that
trai
ning
ne
eds
may
incl
ude
but n
ot
be li
mite
d to
: eco
nom
ic
valu
atio
n an
d co
st s
harin
g pr
inci
ples
; int
erpr
etat
ion
of
Tra
inin
g co
nduc
ted
as
plan
ned
at 5
.2.1
dur
ing
perio
d A
pril
2011
–
Dec
embe
r 20
12
Tra
inin
g m
ater
ials
and
su
mm
arie
s lo
aded
to L
aura
pr
ojec
t web
site
with
in 2
w
eeks
of t
rain
ing
activ
ity
com
plet
ion
Num
ber
of tr
aini
ng e
vent
s N
umbe
r of
gov
ernm
ent
invo
lved
N
umbe
r of
trai
ning
mat
eria
ls
prod
uced
and
acc
essi
ble
on
the
proj
ect w
ebsi
te
Num
ber
of tr
aini
ng e
vent
su
mm
ary
repo
rts
and
thei
r in
clus
ion
in th
e qu
arte
rly e
-
Ava
ilabi
lity
and
inte
rest
of
com
mun
ity m
embe
rs to
pa
rtic
ipat
e in
trai
ning
ac
tiviti
es
Ava
ilabl
e ex
pert
ise
to
deve
lop
and
deliv
er tr
aini
ng
mat
eria
ls to
add
ress
prio
rity
need
s fo
r co
mm
unity
m
embe
rs
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IW
RM
Pro
ject
M
anag
emen
t Uni
t (R
MI)
, and
LI
WLM
AC
34
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/Out
com
e K
ey In
dica
tors
M
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n A
ssum
ptio
ns/R
isks
R
espo
nsib
le
Part
ners
so
cio-
econ
omic
and
sci
entif
ic
data
and
its
use
in p
lann
ing
and
zoni
ng la
nd u
se; a
nd
IWR
M p
olic
y an
d pl
anni
ng.
Sum
mar
ies
of a
ll tra
inin
g ev
ents
incl
uded
in q
uarte
rly
elec
troni
c ne
wsl
ette
rs
Surv
ey to
mea
sure
ski
ll de
velo
pmen
t (on
goin
g A
pril
2011
- M
arch
201
3)
new
slet
ter
Res
ults
of s
kill
deve
lopm
ent
surv
ey
Skill
deve
lopm
ent s
urve
y pr
ovid
es re
alis
tic b
asel
ines
an
d m
easu
res
of
impr
ovem
ent
5.2.
4 Id
entif
icat
ion
of n
eeds
and
op
portu
nitie
s fo
r a g
roup
st
udy
tour
(inc
ludi
ng
RM
IEP
A m
anag
emen
t sta
ff an
d se
lect
ed N
GO
and
co
mm
unity
gro
up m
embe
rs
from
Lau
ra) t
o se
lect
ed G
EF
IWR
M d
emon
stra
tion
proj
ects
in th
e Pa
cific
regi
on.
Lear
ning
and
exc
hang
e ne
eds
and
oppo
rtuni
ties
with
ot
her G
EF d
emon
stra
tion
proj
ects
iden
tifie
d at
ann
ual
Reg
iona
l Ste
erin
g C
omm
ittee
M
eetin
gs
Stud
y to
ur c
onve
ned
by
Dec
embe
r 201
3
Rep
ublic
of M
arsh
all I
slan
ds’
lear
ning
and
exc
hang
e ne
eds
and
oppo
rtuni
ties
note
d in
ann
ual R
SC m
eetin
g re
port
Num
ber o
r par
ticip
ants
and
du
ratio
n of
lear
ning
ex
chan
ge s
tudy
tour
Avai
labi
lity
of re
gion
al fu
nds
or n
atio
nal d
emo
proj
ect
fund
s to
sup
port
lear
ning
ex
chan
ge
Suita
bilit
y of
oth
er G
EF
IWR
M d
emon
stra
tions
to
lear
ning
nee
ds o
f the
R
epub
lic o
f Mar
shal
l Isl
ands
RM
IEP
A, G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I), a
nd
LIW
LMAC
5.2.
5 Pr
epar
atio
n an
d di
strib
utio
n of
pos
ters
, bro
chur
es a
nd
book
lets
on
topi
cs o
f re
leva
nce
to IW
RM
and
W
ater
Use
Effi
cien
cy a
s id
entif
ied
in th
e tra
inin
g ne
eds
asse
ssm
ent.
Lear
ning
mat
eria
ls p
rodu
ced
and
dist
ribut
ed (o
ngoi
ng A
pril
2011
- M
arch
201
3)
Num
ber o
f boo
ks, b
roch
ures
, bo
okle
ts in
clud
ing
date
s of
co
mpl
etio
n D
istri
butio
n lis
ts (i
.e. w
ho
rece
ived
them
and
how
m
any)
Avai
labl
e ex
perti
se to
de
velo
p m
ater
ials
G
EF IW
RM
Pr
ojec
t M
anag
emen
t Uni
t (R
MI)
C
ompo
nent
6: M
anag
emen
t and
Coo
rdin
atio
n of
the
Laur
a D
emon
stra
tion
Proj
ect
6.1
Succ
essf
ul m
anag
emen
t, co
ordi
natio
n, a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n of
: the
pr
ojec
t to
achi
eve
the
Dem
onst
ratio
n ob
ject
ives
an
d to
mee
t the
stra
tegi
c ne
eds
of th
e R
epub
lic o
f M
arsh
all I
slan
d’s
Envi
ronm
enta
l Pro
tect
ion
Auth
ority
.
Com
plet
ion
of p
lann
ed
activ
ities
agr
eed
with
R
MIE
PA,
LIW
LMAC
, the
R
egio
nal P
roje
ct M
anag
er,
and
the
Reg
iona
l Pro
ject
St
eerin
g C
omm
ittee
Pr
oduc
tion
of s
peci
fied
Dem
onst
ratio
n de
liver
able
s w
ithin
the
agre
ed p
erio
d an
d co
st
Qua
rterly
pro
gres
s re
ports
An
nual
Dem
onst
ratio
n Pr
ojec
t Im
plem
enta
tion
Rev
iew
Rep
orts
M
id-T
erm
Eva
luat
ion
Term
inal
Eva
luat
ion
Con
sist
ency
of s
taffi
ng
arra
ngem
ents
at R
MIE
PA
C
onsi
sten
t env
ironm
enta
l co
nditi
ons,
e.g
., no
sev
ere,
le
ngth
y dr
ough
ts o
r oth
er
disa
ster
s w
hich
cou
ld re
quire
re
dire
ctio
n of
RM
IEPA
and
pr
ojec
t sta
ff tim
e Ad
equa
te p
artic
ipat
ion
of
stak
ehol
ders
RM
IEP
A an
d G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I)
6.2
Effe
ctiv
e pl
anni
ng a
nd
cont
rol o
f the
end
orse
d Bu
dget
sho
ws
diss
ecte
d es
timat
es o
f the
cos
t of k
ey
Annu
al b
udge
ts a
nd w
ork
plan
s C
onsi
sten
cy o
f sta
ffing
ar
rang
emen
ts a
t RM
IEP
A
RM
IEP
A an
d G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/Out
com
e K
ey In
dica
tors
M
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n A
ssum
ptio
ns/R
isks
R
espo
nsib
le
Part
ners
de
mon
stra
tion
proj
ect
budg
et, i
nclu
ding
de
velo
pmen
t of c
ash
flow
pr
edic
tions
con
sist
ent w
ith
the
appr
oved
pro
ject
wor
k pl
an a
nd b
udge
t for
the
dura
tion
of th
e pr
ojec
t
dem
onst
ratio
n ac
tiviti
es b
y U
ND
P C
ost C
odes
Es
timat
es o
f cos
t for
a g
iven
ye
ar, f
utur
e ye
ars
and
the
dem
onst
ratio
n as
a w
hole
en
dors
ed b
y th
e R
egio
nal
Proj
ect S
teer
ing
Com
mitt
ee
Cas
h flo
w p
redi
ctio
ns
cons
iste
nt w
ith w
ork
plan
and
up
date
d on
a q
uarte
rly b
asis
Qua
rterly
bud
gets
and
wor
k pl
ans
Endo
rsem
ent o
f bud
get b
y LI
WLM
AC a
nd s
ubse
quen
t ap
prov
al b
y R
egio
nal
Stee
ring
Com
mitt
ee
mee
tings
Fina
ncia
l pla
nnin
g an
d m
anag
emen
t exp
ertis
e in
Pr
ojec
t Uni
t Man
agem
ent
Uni
t
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I)
6.3
Esta
blis
hmen
t and
effe
ctiv
e op
erat
ion
of a
Dem
onst
ratio
n Pr
ojec
t Man
agem
ent U
nit
(PM
U) t
o: (a
) man
age
the
inte
rface
bet
wee
n th
e le
ad
agen
cy a
nd th
e re
gion
al
Proj
ect C
oord
inat
ing
unit,
us
er g
roup
s, a
nd o
ther
st
akeh
olde
rs a
nd
gove
rnm
ent a
genc
ies;
and
to
(b) m
anag
e th
e co
nsul
tatio
n pr
oces
s to
ens
ure
com
preh
ensi
ve in
put f
rom
us
er g
roup
s an
d ot
her
stak
ehol
ders
into
the
deve
lopm
ent a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
proj
ect
Proj
ect M
anag
er a
nd
Assi
stan
t con
tract
s O
ffice
est
ablis
hed
with
ne
cess
ary
com
mun
icat
ion
tech
nolo
gy
Proj
ect i
ssue
s de
alt w
ith a
s th
ey a
rise,
incl
udin
g id
entif
icat
ion
of o
ptio
ns fo
r th
eir r
esol
utio
n Pr
ojec
t coo
rdin
atio
n m
eetin
gs c
onve
ned
regu
larly
an
d ac
cord
ing
to w
ork
plan
Pr
ojec
t pro
gres
s an
d fin
anci
al re
ports
sub
mitt
ed
quar
terly
to re
gion
al P
CU
M
aint
enan
ce o
f acc
urat
e re
cord
s of
mee
tings
, rep
orts
, fin
anci
al m
onito
ring
data
, sp
ecifi
catio
ns, a
nd b
riefs
re
late
d to
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
proj
ect
Qua
rterly
pro
gres
s re
ports
An
nual
Dem
onst
ratio
n Pr
ojec
t Im
plem
enta
tion
Rev
iew
Rep
orts
M
id-T
erm
Eva
luat
ion
Term
inal
Eva
luat
ion
Con
sist
ency
of s
taffi
ng
arra
ngem
ents
at R
MIE
PA
C
onsi
sten
t env
ironm
enta
l co
nditi
ons,
e.g
., no
sev
ere,
le
ngth
y dr
ough
ts o
r oth
er
disa
ster
s w
hich
cou
ld re
quire
re
dire
ctio
n of
RM
IEPA
and
pr
ojec
t sta
ff tim
e Ad
equa
te p
artic
ipat
ion
of
stak
ehol
ders
RM
IEP
A an
d G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I)
6.4
Con
sist
ency
bet
wee
n th
e va
rious
pro
ject
com
pone
nts
and
rela
ted
activ
ities
pr
ovid
ed o
r fun
ded
by o
ther
do
nor o
rgan
isat
ions
, in
clud
ing
real
isat
ion
of c
o-
Des
ign
of n
ew w
ater
and
la
nd p
roje
cts
and
prog
ram
mes
at L
aura
, bot
h go
vern
men
t and
ext
erna
lly
fund
ed, c
onsi
sten
t with
de
mon
stra
tion
proj
ect
Qua
rterly
pro
gres
s re
ports
An
nual
Dem
onst
ratio
n Pr
ojec
t Im
plem
enta
tion
Rev
iew
Rep
orts
M
id-T
erm
Eva
luat
ion
Term
inal
Eva
luat
ion
Con
sist
ency
of s
taffi
ng
arra
ngem
ents
at R
MIE
PA
W
illing
ness
of o
ther
pro
ject
s an
d do
nors
to c
olla
bora
te
RM
IEP
A an
d G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I)
35
Out
put
No.
O
utpu
t/Out
com
e K
ey In
dica
tors
M
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n A
ssum
ptio
ns/R
isks
R
espo
nsib
le
Part
ners
de
mon
stra
tion
proj
ect
budg
et, i
nclu
ding
de
velo
pmen
t of c
ash
flow
pr
edic
tions
con
sist
ent w
ith
the
appr
oved
pro
ject
wor
k pl
an a
nd b
udge
t for
the
dura
tion
of th
e pr
ojec
t
dem
onst
ratio
n ac
tiviti
es b
y U
ND
P C
ost C
odes
Es
timat
es o
f cos
t for
a g
iven
ye
ar, f
utur
e ye
ars
and
the
dem
onst
ratio
n as
a w
hole
en
dors
ed b
y th
e R
egio
nal
Proj
ect S
teer
ing
Com
mitt
ee
Cas
h flo
w p
redi
ctio
ns
cons
iste
nt w
ith w
ork
plan
and
up
date
d on
a q
uarte
rly b
asis
Qua
rterly
bud
gets
and
wor
k pl
ans
Endo
rsem
ent o
f bud
get b
y LI
WLM
AC a
nd s
ubse
quen
t ap
prov
al b
y R
egio
nal
Stee
ring
Com
mitt
ee
mee
tings
Fina
ncia
l pla
nnin
g an
d m
anag
emen
t exp
ertis
e in
Pr
ojec
t Uni
t Man
agem
ent
Uni
t
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I)
6.3
Esta
blis
hmen
t and
effe
ctiv
e op
erat
ion
of a
Dem
onst
ratio
n Pr
ojec
t Man
agem
ent U
nit
(PM
U) t
o: (a
) man
age
the
inte
rface
bet
wee
n th
e le
ad
agen
cy a
nd th
e re
gion
al
Proj
ect C
oord
inat
ing
unit,
us
er g
roup
s, a
nd o
ther
st
akeh
olde
rs a
nd
gove
rnm
ent a
genc
ies;
and
to
(b) m
anag
e th
e co
nsul
tatio
n pr
oces
s to
ens
ure
com
preh
ensi
ve in
put f
rom
us
er g
roup
s an
d ot
her
stak
ehol
ders
into
the
deve
lopm
ent a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
proj
ect
Proj
ect M
anag
er a
nd
Assi
stan
t con
tract
s O
ffice
est
ablis
hed
with
ne
cess
ary
com
mun
icat
ion
tech
nolo
gy
Proj
ect i
ssue
s de
alt w
ith a
s th
ey a
rise,
incl
udin
g id
entif
icat
ion
of o
ptio
ns fo
r th
eir r
esol
utio
n Pr
ojec
t coo
rdin
atio
n m
eetin
gs c
onve
ned
regu
larly
an
d ac
cord
ing
to w
ork
plan
Pr
ojec
t pro
gres
s an
d fin
anci
al re
ports
sub
mitt
ed
quar
terly
to re
gion
al P
CU
M
aint
enan
ce o
f acc
urat
e re
cord
s of
mee
tings
, rep
orts
, fin
anci
al m
onito
ring
data
, sp
ecifi
catio
ns, a
nd b
riefs
re
late
d to
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
proj
ect
Qua
rterly
pro
gres
s re
ports
An
nual
Dem
onst
ratio
n Pr
ojec
t Im
plem
enta
tion
Rev
iew
Rep
orts
M
id-T
erm
Eva
luat
ion
Term
inal
Eva
luat
ion
Con
sist
ency
of s
taffi
ng
arra
ngem
ents
at R
MIE
PA
C
onsi
sten
t env
ironm
enta
l co
nditi
ons,
e.g
., no
sev
ere,
le
ngth
y dr
ough
ts o
r oth
er
disa
ster
s w
hich
cou
ld re
quire
re
dire
ctio
n of
RM
IEPA
and
pr
ojec
t sta
ff tim
e Ad
equa
te p
artic
ipat
ion
of
stak
ehol
ders
RM
IEP
A an
d G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I)
6.4
Con
sist
ency
bet
wee
n th
e va
rious
pro
ject
com
pone
nts
and
rela
ted
activ
ities
pr
ovid
ed o
r fun
ded
by o
ther
do
nor o
rgan
isat
ions
, in
clud
ing
real
isat
ion
of c
o-
Des
ign
of n
ew w
ater
and
la
nd p
roje
cts
and
prog
ram
mes
at L
aura
, bot
h go
vern
men
t and
ext
erna
lly
fund
ed, c
onsi
sten
t with
de
mon
stra
tion
proj
ect
Qua
rterly
pro
gres
s re
ports
An
nual
Dem
onst
ratio
n Pr
ojec
t Im
plem
enta
tion
Rev
iew
Rep
orts
M
id-T
erm
Eva
luat
ion
Term
inal
Eva
luat
ion
Con
sist
ency
of s
taffi
ng
arra
ngem
ents
at R
MIE
PA
W
illing
ness
of o
ther
pro
ject
s an
d do
nors
to c
olla
bora
te
RM
IEP
A an
d G
EF
IWR
M P
roje
ct
Man
agem
ent U
nit
(RM
I) O
utpu
t N
o.
Out
put/O
utco
me
Key
Indi
cato
rs
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Ass
umpt
ions
/Ris
ks
Res
pons
ible
P
artn
ers
finan
cing
whe
re p
ossi
ble
obje
ctiv
es a
nd a
ctiv
ities
6.
5 P
artic
ipat
ion
of p
roje
ct
repr
esen
tativ
es in
mee
tings
of
the
Reg
iona
l Pro
ject
S
teer
ing
Com
mitt
ee
Mee
tings
, and
ass
ocia
ted
regi
onal
trai
ning
and
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g se
ssio
ns
IWR
M F
ocal
Poi
nt a
nd G
EF
IWR
M d
emon
stra
tion
proj
ect
man
ager
par
ticip
ate
in
annu
al R
egio
nal S
teer
ing
Com
mitt
ee m
eetin
gs
Reg
iona
l Ste
erin
g C
omm
ittee
M
eetin
g R
epor
t par
ticip
ant
list
Con
sist
ency
of s
taffi
ng
arra
ngem
ents
at R
MIE
PA
R
MIE
PA
and
GE
F IW
RM
Pro
ject
M
anag
emen
t Uni
t (R
MI)
N
ATI
ON
AL
PO
LIC
Y A
ND
LE
GA
L R
EFO
RM
S F
OR
IWR
M
P.1
N
atio
nal C
omm
ittee
(nam
ed “N
atio
nal I
nteg
rate
d W
ater
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Tas
k Fo
rce”
) est
ablis
hed
and
activ
ities
to re
vita
lise
at 1
.2
P.2
N
atio
nal W
ater
Sum
mit
to
info
rm s
take
hold
ers
of: (
a)
Nat
iona
l Int
egra
ted
Wat
er
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Tas
k Fo
rce
Man
date
and
R
espo
nsib
ilitie
s; a
nd (b
) pr
opos
ed p
roce
ss fo
r pol
icy
and
legi
slat
ive
refo
rm fo
r IW
RM
and
WU
E
Nat
iona
l Wat
er S
umm
it co
nven
ed o
n W
orld
Wat
er
Day
(22nd
Mar
ch) 2
011
Sta
keho
lder
s in
form
ed o
f pr
opos
ed p
roce
ss fo
r IW
RM
an
d W
UE
pol
icy
and
lega
l re
form
. C
omm
ents
rece
ived
by
22nd
A
pril
2011
Nat
iona
l Wat
er S
umm
it co
nven
ed
Pol
icy
pape
r out
linin
g:
mem
bers
hip;
ToR
/man
date
; an
d re
spon
sibi
litie
s of
N
atio
nal I
nteg
rate
d W
ater
R
esou
rce
Man
agem
ent T
ask
Forc
e; a
nd a
gree
d st
eps
for
unde
rtaki
ng p
olic
y an
d le
gisl
ativ
e re
form
for I
WR
M
and
WU
E in
RM
I.
Suf
ficie
nt h
igh
leve
l pol
itica
l bu
y-in
S
uffic
ient
inte
rest
am
ongs
t st
akeh
olde
rs to
com
men
t on
prop
osed
pro
cess
RM
IEP
A a
nd
IWR
M P
olic
y O
ffice
r
P.3
R
evie
w o
f exi
stin
g po
licie
s an
d la
ws
rela
ting
to w
ater
an
d sa
nita
tion,
and
id
entif
icat
ion
of n
eeds
with
re
spec
t to
natio
nal p
olic
y an
d le
gisl
ativ
e re
form
Pol
icy
Adv
iser
recr
uite
d by
Fe
brua
ry 2
011
Pol
icy
repo
rt re
view
ed a
nd
endo
rsed
by
Nat
iona
l In
tegr
ated
Wat
er R
esou
rce
Man
agem
ent T
ask
Forc
e an
d ci
rcul
ated
for p
ublic
com
men
t by
Jun
e 20
11
Fina
l rep
ort p
ublis
hed
and
com
men
ted
by J
uly
2011
Pol
icy
revi
ew re
port
A
vaila
bilit
y of
spe
cial
ist w
ith
expe
rtise
requ
ired
to
effe
ctiv
ely
reco
ncile
sc
ient
ific,
tech
nica
l, a
nd
polit
ical
issu
es re
latin
g to
IW
RM
and
WU
E in
RM
I
RM
IEP
A a
nd
IWR
M P
olic
y O
ffice
r
P.4
D
raft
natio
nal w
ater
pol
icy
and
reco
mm
ende
d le
gal
refo
rms
endo
rsed
by
Nat
iona
l Wat
er C
omm
ittee
fo
r sub
mis
sion
to C
abin
et
Pub
lic h
earin
g to
pre
sent
re
com
men
datio
ns to
st
akeh
olde
rs S
epte
mbe
r 20
11
Com
men
t rec
eive
d an
d fin
al
Pub
lic h
earin
g re
cord
s D
raft
polic
y do
cum
ent
Fina
l dra
ft su
bmitt
ed to
C
abin
et
Ade
quat
e tim
e to
ens
ure
suffi
cien
t buy
-in fr
om s
enio
r of
ficia
ls
RM
IEP
A a
nd
IWR
M P
olic
y O
ffice
r
36
annex 5: results notes
1
GEF PACIFIC IWRM PROJECT RESULTS
NOTE
Integrated Water and Land Management for the Sustainable Use of
the Laura Water Lens, Majuro Atoll
Top 3 Project Results 1. Establishment and Operation of the National IWRM Task Force as RMI’s APEX Body for Coordination and Planning of Water and Sanitation Investments and Actions 2. Strengthened Community Engagement with National Government on Water and Sanitation Issues via Establishment and Operation of the Laura Lens Committee 3. Reduced stress on the Laura Water Lens by development and operation of septic remediation programme, pilot ECOSAN, and conversion of piggeries from wash down waste disposal systems to dry litter systems
Mr. Julius Lucky [email protected]
RMI Environmental Protection Authority
http://www.pacific-iwrm.org/results RSC 5 2013
Implementing Sustainable Water Resource and Wastewater Management in Pacific Island Countries
37
2
============================================================================= 1. PROJECT OBJECTIVE The objective of the “Integrated Water and Land Management for the Sustainable Use of the Laura Water Lens” Project (Laura Lens Project) is to strengthen national and local coordination for water resource management with a focus on reducing stress on the Laura Water Lens and planning the longer-term sustainable use of the Laura Water Lens. ============================================================================= 2. RESULTS: PROCESS A start-up committee for the IWRM Demonstration Project was first established in 2009 with members limited to traditional leaders, major landowners, and Council officials from the Local Government. Following establishment of the Project Management Unit In 2010, effort was made to revitalise and expand the membership of this group. Initially, traditional leaders and Laura residents were invited to consultations to re-introduce project goals, objectives, and to ensure all key traditional leaders were adequately represented in these discussions. Establishment of this locally based committee has been effective in: (a) building relationships of government with traditional landowners and leaders and (b) has also been catalytic in terms of influencing decision makers at the national level to provide support for the revitalisation of the “National IWRM Task Force” to lead national IWRM policy and planning. The National IWRM Task Force then proceeded to organize a national consultative process, including a large National Water and Sanitation Summit convened in March 2011 involving ~300 participants, to agree targets and priorities for the development of national policy and an IWRM Plan. This has facilitated the development of a National Water and Sanitation Policy and draft IWRM Plan for endorsement 2013. 2(a) INDICATOR#1: BEST IWRM AND WUE APPROACHES DEFINED Prior to project inception a consultant had been engaged to identify IWRM and WUE needs for the Marshall Islands. Although these had not been considered by communities or relevant agencies of government. The target was to have the approach defined and endorsed by national APEX body. Via the operation of a national consultation process, involving communities and women’s groups, priorities for and steps towards institutionalizing IWRM approaches in the RMI have been developed and endorsed by the National IWRM Task Force.
Figure 1: Influential female members of the community, including the First Lady, Government Officials, and WUTMI
members attend the 2011 Water Summit to lend their support to IWRM initiatives in RMI
383
Figure 2: Members of the National IWRM Task Force working to incorporate agreed approaches for IWRM into
the National Water and Sanitation Policy 2(b) INDICATOR#2: INCREASE IN COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT WITH NATIONAL GOVERNMENT ON WATER ISSUES At the time of project inception, the relationship with the Laura community and national government was tenuous due to a history of dispute over water resource access and allocation. Prior to project commencement, only 2 community group representatives occasionally took part in government workshops. Regular engagement of traditional leaders, landowners, and Laura residents with government through the operation of the community-based Laura Lens Committee has assisted with developing a common understanding and trust between the community, with on average 12 community leaders meeting on a quarterly basis with government.
Figure 3: Community representatives participating in a National Water Summit in 2011 2(c) INDICATOR#3: MULTI-SECTORAL APEX BODY IN PLACE At the time of project inception, there was no APEX body for water in the RMI. The target of the project was to have such a body established and operational by July 2010. RMI’s National IWRM Task Force was established by Executive Order and includes membership off all relevant community
394
and traditional leaders, national government departments, local governments, private sector and NGOs. The Task Force is actively leading coordination, policy development, and planning.
Figure 4: National IWRM Task Force making a presentation to RMI Parliament on IWRM Policy 2(d) INDICATOR#4: SECTORAL ENGAGEMENT IN FORMAL MULTILATERAL COMMUNICATION ON WATER ISSUES Prior to commencement of IWRM there was limited cross sectoral engagement or communication on water issues. The project aimed to increase engagement, with a particular emphasis on strengthening communication between national government and traditional community-based governance arrangements. The National IWRM Task Force established the forum for this and, with Secretariat support for this group provided through the IWRM, up to 30 different agencies from national and local government, representatives of NGOs, and community leaders have met on a quarterly basis to discuss national water and sanitation policy and IWRM planning, review the status of various water related investment in the Marshall Islands, and to share information on the results of various stress reduction technologies being trialed as part of the IWRM demonstration project. Minutes of the meetings of National IWRM Task Force indicate a high level of continuity of participation by senior representatives of the participating agencies in these meetings.
Figure 5: The President of the Republic of the Marshall Islands facilitating the National Water Summit in 2011
40 5
2(e) INDICATOR#5: LAURA LENS INTEGRATED WATER AND LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE At project inception there existed no mechanism for local community stakeholders, including landowners and traditional leaders to contribute to planning and management of water resource use and sanitation in the area of the Laura groundwater lens. The target of the project was to establish a local coordinating committee to enable community input to planning at both local and national levels and to establish a formal linkage between local stakeholders and the National IWRM Task Force. Terms of Reference and membership for a Laura Lens Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee (or Laura Lens Committee) were developed, considered by the 2011 National Water and Sanitation Summit, and subsequently endorsed by the Chair of the National IWRM Task Force. The Committee has been in operation since 2011 and acts to guide planning of local stress reduction initiatives and provides inputs to national policy and planning.
Figure 6: Members of the Laura Lens Committee meeting with a regional expert on pig waste management to discuss and plan
the installation and maintenance of dry litter pig pens in the Laura Community 2(f) INDICATOR#6: PROPORTION OF COMMUNITY ENGAGED IN WATER RELATED ISSUES Community engagement in awareness activities and on-the-ground work for environment and natural resource management was largely limited to solid waste management prior to the commencement of the IWRM demonstration project. This project aimed to achieve a 30 percent increase in community participation in both water and sanitation related awareness and engagement activities. This has been achieved by development and operation of a targeted water resource protection awareness program which has been mainstreamed into the routine operations of RMI EPA. Supporting initiatives include the active participation of 33 households in testing dry litter pig pens and ecosanitation toilets in the Laura community.
416
Figure 7: Community awareness workshop on IWRM and safeguarding the Laura lens convened as part of the IWRM
demonstration project’s outreach programme 2(g) INDICATOR#7: BEST APPROACHES TO IWRM AND WUE MAINSTREAMED INTO NATIONAL AND REGIONAL PLANNING FRAMEWORKS Prior to project commencement the RMI had no strategy or agreed approaches to water and sanitation policy. The project aimed to define targets and priority actions for IWRM aimed at strengthening national coordination and reducing stress on vulnerable water resources for mainstreaming into national and regional planning frameworks. An intensive consultative process, involving broad cross-sectoral and community participation, enabled the definition of best approaches for water and sanitation management which were subsequently incorporated in the draft National Water and Sanitation Policy and IWRM Plan. National priorities have also been used in broader regional efforts during 2012-2013 to revise the Regional Action Plan for Water and Sanitation.
Figure 8: The Republic of the Marshall Islands’ national policy and planning framework for the water and sanitation sector
42
7
2(h) INDICATOR#8: LESSONS LEARNED INCORPORATED INTO OTHER PROJECT(S) AND/OR REGULATIONS The Majuro Atoll Local Government (MALGOV) ordinances human and pig waste management and the RMIEPA regulations for household toilets require the use of septic systems at each household in the Laura community. Limited resources for septic pump-out and disposal had led to overloaded septic systems contaminating the Laura water lens. The project demonstrated alternative, locally appropriate technologies for the management of pig-waste (dry-litter pig pens) and human waste (ecosanitation composting toilets) in the Laura community. The Laura lens committee for the project has initiated efforts with MALGOV and RMIEPA to amend local government ordinances and national regulations to encourage the use of dry litter pig pens and ecosanitation toilets in place of septic systems.
Figure 9: Council members discussing issues relating to use of septic systems in areas of the vulnerable Laura groundwater lens
============================================================================= 3. RESULTS: STRESS REDUCTION The Laura Lens Project aims to reduce stress on the Laura Water Lens via targeted actions addressing pollution from septic systems, piggeries, and domestic solid waste. These will be supported via introduction of a zoning scheme based on an assessment of Laura water lens vulnerability to land and water uses. Key achievements to date include conduct of a survey of solid and septic waste management practices and needs for all Laura households, and development of septic monitoring and pump-out programme; community led design and conduct of household water use and sanitation audit; construction of 3 pilot ECOSAN systems at prominent locations in Laura community; preliminary works to remediate a large broken pig waste septic at a commercial piggery and conversion of its operation to a dry litter system; and conversion of 30 household pig pens to dry litter system from typical water intensive wash down pens. 3(a) INDICATOR#1: REDUCTION IN SEWAGE POLLUTION IN LAURA COMMUNITY At the time of project inception, there was no system in place for reducing sewage pollution in Laura. Many household septic systems were overloaded and broken. The target of the project was to have 35 percent reduction in sewage pollution of the lens from households. The survey of septic waste identified 117 broken and overloaded septics requiring immediate pump-out. To date around 40% of these septics have been remediated.
438
Figure 10: Example of an overloaded septic immediately above the Laura Water Lens 3(b) INDICATOR#2: REDUCTION IN POLLUTION SOURCES DISCHARGING INTO LAURA GROUNDWATER At the time of project inception, there was no action underway for reducing pollution discharges into Laura groundwater. The target of the project is to achieve 30% reduction in sources discharging into Laura groundwater. To date the number of households and pollutant sources have been identified and characterized. Pollution from pig waste has been identified as a major source. Preliminary work has been done to remediate a large broken pig waste septic at a commercial piggery and conversion of its operation to a dry litter system, and conversion of 30 household pig pens to dry litter system from typical water intensive wash down pens. An ECOSAN pilot activity is also underway in the Laura community, with 3 pilot systems constructed at prominent locations in Laura community. The national IWRM Plan for RMI is being developed and contains targeted costed actions for pig waste management and ECOSAN replication and scaling-up.
Figure 11: Commercial piggery situation above the Laura Water Lens with effluent discharge into cesspit immediately in the
lens. High levels of e coli have been recorded at wells in the vicinity.
449
Figure 12: Waterless dry litter pig waste management being promoted in the Laura community at commercial pig
farms and for household pig pens (change photos above to include Bokmej and household pens
Figure 13 Current toilets being utilized at Laura providing poor sanitation and septic systems
4510
Figure 14: Recently constructed eco-san toilets as part stress reduction methods and ideal replacement for current
toilets being used on Laura 3(c) INDICATOR#3: POPULATION WITH ACCESS TO IMPROVED SANITATION Prior to inception of the IWRM demonstration project there was no monitoring of the status of sanitation systems in the Laura community. Routine monitoring of well water quality and resultant e-coli data had indicated significant risk of waterborne disease. Priority targets of the project were to conduct an assessment of the state of sanitation at the project site and to initiate a monitoring programme to identify septic system remediation and sludge disposal needs. Based on the results of this assessment, the project initiated a partnership with the Majuro Water and Sewer Company for the the routine pump-out of septic systems. To date this has resulted in almost 40 percent of overloaded septic systems having been remediated. Recent surveys of well water quality indicate significant reduction of e-coli in the Laura lens groundwater. This has been augmented with efforts to promote ecosanitation approaches within the community.
Figure 15: The Majuro Water and Sewer Company septic pump-out operations 3(d) INDICATOR#4: REDUCTION IN USE OF FRESHWATER FOR SANITATION PURPOSES DUE TO COMPOSTING TOILET INSTALLATION Prior to project commencement there was limited understanding of the volumes of water used for sanitation at the household level. The project aimed to provide practical demonstrations to
46
11
householders in the Laura community of how to reduce household water use by 30 percent through the use of ecosanitation composting toilets. Technical exchange with the Tuvalu IWRM project enabled the construction of 3 demonstration toilets at key locations within the Laura community. It has been estimated that these households have reduced water use by 40 percent through the use of composting toilets instead of flush systems. These reductions in water use have been augmented by the conversion of wash-down pig pens to waterless dry litter pig waste management systems at 30 households in the community.
Figure 16 Comparison of the commonly used flush toilet in Laura with the waterless composting toilet demonstrated in the Laura community 4. RESULTS: WATER RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS IWRM in the Marshall Islands aims to contribute to improved water resource status by increasing population with access to safe drinking water supply and with access to sanitation. Drinking water safety has been addressed via the development of a drinking water safety planning and IWRM planning underway for RMI incorporates the replication of this work on Ebeye. 4(a) INDICATOR#1: POPULATION WITH ACCESS TO SAFE WATER At the time of project implementation, there had been no water safety planning conducted for Majuro Atoll. The target of the project is to have the Majuro Water Safety Plan implemented. To date water safety issues have been investigated and discussed with key water providers and businesses. A Water Safety Plan has been drafted and reviewed by the IWRM Task Force and is awaiting formal adoption.
47
annex 6: awareness Materials Developed and Media Coverage
48
annex 7: Participatory Monitoring and evaluation PlanAnnex 6
Participatory Planning, Monitoring, and Reporting Planfor the GEF Pacific IWRM Demonstration Project in the RMI
1. INTRODUCTION
There are multiple and varied planning, monitoring and reporting requirements as part of the GEF Pacific IWRM Project. These were discussed and agreed during the project’s Inception Workshop in September 2009 and were adopted as part of the operation of the Republic of the Marshall Island’s national IWRM demonstration project entitled: “Laura Demonstration Project”.
Participation and engagement of key project stakeholders including community groups and Non-Governmental Organisations. The project coordinating committee Laura Water and Land Management Advisory Group, The Environmental Protection Authority, Cabinet, national development partners, and global donors in project planning, monitoring, and reporting was considered important in guiding the successful implementation of the project in Marshall Islands.
2. GUIDING PRINCIPLES
The key principles used in developing the project planning, monitoring, and reporting approach were that it should:
primarily act to better inform an “IWRM continuum of transition” in the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, results, and sustainability of investment in IWRM;
facilitate good governance of demonstration project activities, including areas of project finances, coordination, planning, capture of lessons learned, and technical quality assurance;
ensure efficient and cost-effective compliance of reporting requirements of the National Government of Marshall Islands SPC/SOPAC, UNDP, UNEP, and the GEF;
ensure relevance of the information and data collected, and that data on project results can be rolled up and down, from “Community to Cabinet” and from “Country to Global Donor”; and
Draw on participatory Most Significant Change (MSC) techniques which act to monitoring and validate reported project impacts on behaviour.
3. PLANNING, MONITORING, AND REPORTING FRAMEWORK
The general planning, monitoring, and reporting framework developed for operation through the Marshall Islands national IWRM demonstration project is summarised in Table 1. The timetable of activities is summarised in Table 1.
Project Planning
Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory CommitteeThe Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee’s main role is to provide direction and strategic guidance to the PMU and the Environment Protection Authority as the Lead Agency regarding the design and implementation of the national demonstration project including amongst other things:
Receive, review and approve reports from the Project Management Unit regarding the outputs and outcomes of project activities
Review stakeholder involvement in project activities and take action where necessary to ensure appropriate levels of government, NGO, community, and private sector engagement
Review and evaluate, at the national level, progress in implementation of the project, and provide guidance for improvement to the PMU and Lead Agency (EPA) when necessary
To establish a Working Committee of the Laura Lens (Groundwater) Protection Plan Periodically consult/inform the community of the status/condition of the lens. Identify potential sources of pollutants/contaminants to the Laura lens.
75
49
Produce awareness and educational materials for the community-schools, residences, and churches.
Involve participation of Laura communities to assist in the campaign of the groundwater protection plan.
In 2010 the Project Management Unit reviewed the status of the Laura Lens Protection Committee with a view to further elaborating the role of the Committee in both the Demonstration Site as well as in national planning processes relating to water and sanitation issues. Consultations were undertaken at the end of 2009 and early 2010 with members of the Committee to identify ways to improve participation at the community level. As a result of the consultations the following suggested actions were undertaken:
Representation of traditional leaders, landowners, church groups, women’s groups, and residents of demonstration site expanded to include leaders not in original membership list
TOR elaborated Advisory Group established to act as working group of the committee PMU meets
quarterly with the main committee (Laura Lens Protection Committee) to provide updates on overall project progress.
The PMU meets quarterly with the Laura Lens Protection Committee to provide updates on overall project progress, review any revisions to the Project Logframe.
Project Monitoring
Advisory Group MeetingsThe Advisory Group meets more frequently than the Committee and acts as a small working group of the Committee to monitor progress of planned activities, work closely with the PMU and facilitate communications between the PMU and the Community in Laura, review and approve quarterly work plans and budgets. Copies of Quarterly Work plans and Budgets are provided to the Advisory Group to inform members on upcoming project activities and get feedback and approval of quarterly plans. Regularly scheduled meetings of the Advisory Group also allow discussion on lessons learned from the perspective of the community and other stakeholders. Members were selected by the main committee to allow more frequent input into planning, decision making and implementation. The group is tasked to review quarterly activities, work plans. During these consultations, PMU presents the work plans for review and endorsement. The PMU also go over previous quarter’s work plan to check off on activities that were successfully implemented as well as activities that were delayed or not undertaken. Lessons learnt are then shared with the group and feedback and suggestions for alternative approaches are agreed on.
Quarterly Work plan and Budgeting
Members of the advisory group reside in Laura and assist the PMU with communicating to community
groups and committee members on project related activities.
Coordination and communication between PMU and Community Laura Community
and Partners
Laura Lens Advisory Group
ProjectManagement
Unit
The Advisory Group has provided an opportunity for the PMU to coordinate more closely with the Laura community and other stakeholder groups when organizing and implementing demo project activities and information sharing and feedback on quarterly work plans and budgets.
76
5077
Project Reporting
Community MeetingsUse of power point presentations for community meetings have become a popular means of informing communities about a range of issues. However PMU have started to use approaches that are more aligned towards traditional practice of having “conversation” in an informal setting in the community seems to encourage more dialogue with community members.
Laura Advisory CommitteeWhen the demonstration Logframe was revised in 2010 it was provided to the committee members for feedback. Members requested that the logframe be translated into the local language, and has been done and distributed to committee members for approval.
Advisory Group MeetingsCopies of Quarterly Workplans and Budgets are provided to the Advisory Group to inform members on upcoming project activities and get feedback and approval of quarterly plans. Regularly scheduled meetings of the Advisory Group also allow discussion on lessons learned not just from the perspective of the PMU but from the perspective of the community and other stakeholders as well.
Newspaper articles Newspaper article submissions are used to highlight project activities. Once outputs, such as baseline studies or survey reports are finalized news articles on results of these outputs will be submitted to local newspapers.
High Level Briefing In September the PMU in coordination with other partners organized a Luncheon for Parliament members to brief members on Climate Change Policy Framework and overview of recommendations of the National Water and Sanitation Summit held in March 2011 and the status and timeline for the development of the National Water and Sanitation Policy as well as Demo Project activities. The briefing allowed an opportunity to have an open dialogue with Parliament Members, which is not always easy to schedule with all members of parliament.
Interviews with Laura Integrated Water and Land Management Advisory Committee membersThe PMU conducted and recorded interviews with members from both the Laura Lens Protection Committee and the National Water Task Force. Their responses and pictures were published in the local newspaper. This is one of the approaches the PMU will use for monitoring and evaluation of the demonstration project through feedback on certain issues from committee members as well as other community groups and individuals.
Annual National Project Implementation Review
Each year the PMU is responsible for completing a National Project Implementation Review (PIR). The PIR is meant to incorporate a range of input from various stakeholders to determine rate of progress against agreed outputs per the project logframe. It is a useful exercise to go through internally and can highlight areas that require more stakeholder engagement. This PIR ideally should be vetted through the Demonstration Project Committees as well as the National IWRM Task Force for feedback. This year the PIR ending June 2011 was completed based on community and task force members responses to interview questions. The PMU is looking into developing a simple way of getting feedback for the PIR. Often times such documents are seen as cumbersome and not always well received, particularly at the community level.
51
78
IWR
M C
ontin
uum
of T
rans
ition
in R
elev
ance
, Effe
ctiv
enes
s, E
ffici
ency
, Res
ults
, and
Sus
tain
abili
ty o
f IN
VEST
MEN
T
Cab
inet
Rev
iew
& U
se o
f Pr
ojec
t Out
puts
/Res
ults
Com
mun
ity In
puts
, Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
& F
eedb
ack
Nat
iona
l IW
RM
C
oord
inat
ing
Com
mitt
ee
Nat
iona
l Lea
d A
genc
y &
Ex
ecut
ing
Part
ners
Monitoring & Reporting by Project Management Unit
Q1
Fina
ncia
l Rep
orts
Q1
Prog
ress
Rep
ort
Q1
Less
ons
Lear
ned
Q1
Tech
nica
l QA
Rev
iew
& F
eedb
ack
Ann
ual N
atio
nal P
roje
ct
Impl
emen
tatio
n R
evie
w
Four
(4) Q
uart
erly
R
epor
ting
Pack
ages
Reg
iona
l Pro
ject
Im
plem
enta
tion
Rev
iew
G
EF P
AC
IFIC
IWR
M
Use
d by
Cou
ntrie
s to
Dra
ft P
IR
Use
d by
RP
CU
to V
alid
ate
Nat
iona
l PIR
Rat
ings
Nat
iona
l PIR
Rat
ings
an
d P
rogr
ess
Rol
led-
up
into
Reg
iona
l PIR
Subm
issi
on to
GEF
IAs
for U
se in
Glo
bal/R
egio
nal
Eval
uatio
n of
Impa
ct
Rev
iew
and
Fee
dbac
k fro
m R
egio
nal T
echn
ical
A
dvis
ers/
Task
Man
ager
s
Part
icip
ator
y Pl
anni
ng
& M
onito
ring
Coo
rdin
atio
n of
R
epor
ting
Qua
rter
ly R
epor
ting
&
Pla
nnin
gC
omm
unity
-Cab
inet
-Glo
bal
Rel
evan
ce o
f Rep
ortin
g
Rel
evan
t and
Mea
ning
ful t
o C
omm
unity
Rel
evan
t and
Mea
ning
ful t
o C
abin
et
Incr
easi
ng L
ocal
Con
text
of
Pla
nnin
g &
Mon
itorin
g
Q2
Cas
h R
eque
st
Country -Global
Part
icip
ator
y M
ost
Sign
ifica
nt
Cha
nge
Tech
niqu
es S
truct
ured
vid
eo
inte
rvie
ws
of W
atS
an
stak
ehol
ders
eng
aged
in
IWR
M a
t var
ious
leve
ls to
ga
uge
lear
ning
and
ch
ange
in p
erce
ptio
n S
tory
boar
ding
to h
elp
com
mun
ities
bet
ter
capt
ure
& c
omm
unic
ate
in
fo o
n im
pact
& c
hang
e
Use
of t
he “S
tory
line”
appr
oach
enc
oura
ges
parti
cipa
tion
and
the
use
of d
ialo
gue
and
stor
ies
to a
sses
s pr
ojec
t im
pact
Community-Based Monitoring
Figu
re 1
S
chem
atic
of t
he P
lann
ing,
Mon
itorin
g, a
nd R
epor
ting
App
roac
h A
dopt
ed fo
r the
RM
I Nat
iona
l IW
RM
Dem
onst
ratio
n P
roje
ct
PRO
JEC
T LO
GFR
AM
EE
volv
ing
Base
d on
St
akeh
olde
r R
evie
w&
Inpu
ts
Q2
Wor
k Pl
anni
ng
52
79
Tabl
e 1
D
raft
Par
ticip
ator
y P
roje
ct P
lann
ing,
Mon
itorin
g, a
nd R
epor
ting
Pla
n
Year
2010
20
11
2012
20
13
Qua
rter
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Com
mun
ity G
roup
s (L
aura
Far
mer
s A
ssoc
iatio
n, W
omen
s G
roup
s)
Par
ticip
atio
n in
regu
lar r
evie
w o
f pro
ject
out
puts
X
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XIn
puts
to p
repa
ratio
n of
qua
rterly
wor
k pl
ans
and
budg
et
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
Ref
lect
ive
revi
ew o
f pro
ject
out
com
es –
wor
ksho
ps
XX
XX
Ann
ual r
evie
w a
nd in
puts
to le
sson
s le
arne
d X
XX
Ann
ual
revi
ew
and
plan
ning
of
us
e of
tra
ditio
nal
know
ledg
e/go
vern
ance
in p
roje
ct p
lann
ing
XX
X
Stor
yboa
rdin
g an
d st
ruct
ured
vid
eo in
terv
iew
app
roac
h to
iden
tify
Mos
t Sig
nific
ant C
hang
e at
com
mun
ity le
vel
WW
D22
/3X
WW
D22
/3X
WW
D22
/3X
Nat
iona
l Coo
rdin
atin
g C
omm
ittee
( La
ura
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Man
agem
ent A
dvis
ory
Gro
up, L
aura
Adv
isor
y Su
b-G
roup
) Q
uarte
rly
inpu
ts
to
prog
ress
, fin
anci
al,
and
less
ons
lear
ned
repo
rts p
repa
red
by P
MU
/com
mun
ity g
roup
s X
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
Qua
rterly
revi
ew/e
ndor
sem
ent o
f wor
k pl
ans
and
budg
et
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
Iden
tific
atio
n of
qua
rterly
nee
ds f
or t
echn
ical
sup
ports
an
d pr
epar
atio
n of
rec
omm
enda
tions
bas
ed o
n kn
own
bene
fits
and
cost
s of
opt
ions
X
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
Ann
ual r
evie
w o
f rep
licat
ion
and
scal
ing-
up p
lans
X
XX
Ann
ual
revi
ew o
f qu
arte
rly r
epor
ts a
nd p
repa
ratio
n of
ad
vice
/gui
danc
e fo
r com
mun
ity g
roup
s X
XX
X
Ann
ual e
ndor
sem
ent
of P
roje
ct I
mpl
emen
tatio
n R
evie
w
and
prep
arat
ion
of a
dvic
e fo
r Cab
inet
/Con
gres
s X
XX
X
Lead
Age
ncy
(Env
ironm
enta
l Pro
tect
ion
Aut
horit
y)
Ong
oing
Ove
rsig
ht o
f Pro
ject
Man
agem
ent U
nit S
taff
Ong
oing
rev
iew
of p
rocu
rem
ent a
nd r
epor
ting
to e
nsur
e co
mpl
ianc
e w
ith fi
duci
ary
stan
dard
s of
MoA
par
ties
Qua
rterly
revi
ew a
nd s
igna
ture
of p
rogr
ess
and
finan
cial
re
ports
for s
ubm
issi
on to
SP
C/S
OP
AC
RC
U
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
Subm
issi
on
of
annu
al
PIR
an
d an
nual
su
mm
ary
of
com
mun
ity w
orks
hop(
s) to
Cab
inet
X
XX
X
Dev
elop
men
t Par
tner
s (U
ND
P an
d U
NEP
) R
evie
w a
nd fe
edba
ck o
n an
nual
PIR
repo
rts
XX
XX
Sub
mis
sion
of a
nnua
l pro
ject
resu
lts to
glo
bal d
atab
ase
XX
XX
Pre
para
tion
of m
ater
ials
for g
loba
l sha
ring
of re
sults
X
XX
Sup
port
to p
rodu
ctio
n of
pro
ject
exp
erie
nce
note
s an
d re
ports
on
resu
lts in
glo
bal w
ater
for a
(e.g
. IW
C6&
7)
XIW
C6
XIW
C7
53
annex 8: replication and scaling-up Plan
54
annex 9: IW Pilot Project Logframe
Com
pone
nts
Out
com
esIn
dica
tor
Bas
elin
eTa
rget
s En
d of
Pr
ojec
tSo
urce
of
Verifi
catio
nR
isks
and
A
ssum
ptio
ns1.
Sus
tain
ed
com
mun
ity
adop
tion
of
app
ropr
iate
on
-sit
e w
aste
m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
s to
redu
ce
cont
amin
ant
impa
cts
on e
nvir
onm
enta
l an
d pu
blic
hea
lth
at
laur
a vi
llage
1.1
evid
ence
bas
ed
appl
icat
ion
of o
n-si
te
was
te m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
s th
roug
h op
tim
al
desi
gn a
nd o
pera
tion
of
sys
tem
s to
mee
t in
tern
atio
nal s
tand
ards
fo
r wat
er s
afet
y an
d us
e of
hum
an c
ompo
st in
la
ura
villa
ge
exte
nt o
f app
licat
ion
of s
cien
tific
re
com
men
dati
ons
to im
prov
e sy
stem
de
sign
s
lim
ited
und
erst
andi
ng
of p
roce
sses
of o
n-si
te
was
te m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
s an
d ef
ficac
y at
redu
cing
co
ntam
inan
t lo
ads
to
the
laur
a le
ns
loca
lly a
ppro
pria
te
desi
gn a
nd m
anag
emen
t of
on-
site
was
te
man
agem
ent
syst
ems
deve
lope
d th
roug
h ta
rget
ed s
cien
tific
re
sear
ch in
to c
ompo
stin
g m
echa
nism
s, c
onta
min
ant
redu
ctio
ns a
nd o
ptim
al
oper
atin
g co
ndit
ions
to
enha
nce
syst
em e
ffic
acy
doc
umen
ts o
f as
sess
men
ts a
nd
mon
itor
ing
resu
lts,
an
alys
is a
nd re
sear
ch
repo
rts,
com
para
tive
st
udie
s an
d co
nsul
tati
on
mee
ting
repo
rts
impr
oved
des
ign
and
cons
truc
tion
pla
ns
Publ
ishe
d sc
ient
ific
pape
r [y
r 3}
des
ign
and
oper
atio
n of
ec
o-sa
nita
tion
sys
tem
s ar
e ab
le to
be
opti
mal
ly
impr
oved
in re
mot
e is
land
set
ting
reso
urce
s ar
e su
ffic
ient
ly
avai
labl
e fo
r rel
iabl
e an
alys
is o
f eco
-san
itat
ion
syst
ems
to p
rodu
ce
robu
st s
cien
tific
resu
lts
cost
of r
efin
ed d
esig
n do
es n
ot e
xcee
d ab
ility
to
reso
urce
1.2
impr
oved
com
mun
ity
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
was
te
man
agem
ent
issu
es
and
solu
tion
s th
roug
h en
hanc
ed a
cces
s to
ef
fect
ive
and
appr
opri
ate
info
rmat
ion
volu
me
of n
ew
and
addi
tion
al
info
rmat
ion
avai
labl
e an
d ac
cess
ed t
hrou
gh
the
laur
a le
ns
lear
ning
cen
tre
lim
ited
info
rmat
ion
mat
eria
ls a
vaila
ble
thro
ugh
the
laur
a le
ns l
earn
ing
cent
re
the
laur
a le
ns l
earn
ing
cent
re p
opul
ated
wit
h ef
fect
ive
and
appr
opri
ate
educ
atio
nal r
esou
rces
educ
atio
nal f
ilms
and
docu
men
tari
es,
cons
truc
tion
tra
inin
g m
anua
ls, s
yste
m
oper
atio
nal g
uide
s,
com
post
use
gui
delin
es,
radi
o/au
dio
talk
sho
ws,
to
ilet
owne
r int
ervi
ews
and
advi
ce
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
ed
ucat
ion
mat
eria
ls to
in
crea
se c
omm
unit
y un
ders
tand
ing
of w
aste
m
anag
emen
t is
sues
reso
urce
s av
aila
ble
to d
evel
op e
duca
tion
m
ater
ials
1.3
impr
oved
don
or
supp
ort
for i
ncre
ased
ho
useh
olde
r upt
ake
of
on-s
ite
sani
tati
on s
yste
ms
num
ber o
f Gef
Sm
all G
rant
s Pr
ogra
mm
e, u
Said
an
d a
usa
id p
roje
cts
impl
emen
ted
to s
uppo
rt
hous
ehol
der u
ptak
e of
on-
site
san
itat
ion
syst
ems
low
leve
l of
com
mun
ity
acce
ss
to d
onor
fund
s fo
r im
plem
enti
ng
dom
esti
c on
-sit
e w
aste
man
agem
ent
syst
ems
Part
ners
hips
wit
h G
ef
Smal
l Gra
nts
Prog
ram
me,
u
Said
and
aus
aid
to
stre
ngth
en h
ouse
hold
er
abili
ty to
impl
emen
t do
mes
tic
on-s
ite
was
te
man
agem
ent
syst
ems
Gef
Sm
all G
rant
s Pr
ogra
mm
e, u
Said
and
a
usa
id p
roje
ct p
ropo
sals
an
d im
plem
enta
tion
re
port
s
Suit
able
com
mun
ity
base
d or
gani
sati
ons
to a
ssis
t co
mm
unit
ies
wit
h do
nor p
roje
ct
requ
irem
ents
55
Com
pone
nts
Out
com
esIn
dica
tor
Bas
elin
eTa
rget
s En
d of
Pr
ojec
tSo
urce
of
Verifi
catio
nR
isks
and
A
ssum
ptio
ns2.
inte
grat
ing
targ
eted
sc
ient
ific
inve
stig
atio
n on
co
asta
l and
land
eco
syst
em
proc
esse
s, lo
cal k
now
ledg
e an
d st
rate
gic
part
ners
hips
to
stre
ngth
en k
now
ledg
e ba
se
for k
ey e
vide
nce-
base
d ic
m
plan
ning
and
inve
stm
ent
2.1
enha
nced
kno
wle
dge
of li
nkag
e be
twee
n la
nd-
use
and
coas
tal h
ealt
h an
d st
atus
of c
oast
al
habi
tats
in l
aura
are
a
Stat
us o
f dat
a co
llect
ion
prog
ram
mes
for 3
pri
orit
y si
tes
upt
ake
of s
cien
tific
re
com
men
dati
ons
in ic
m
plan
ning
litt
le d
ata
avai
labl
e on
coa
stal
hab
itat
s,
links
bet
wee
n la
nd-
base
d co
ntam
inan
ts
and
coas
tal w
ater
de
grad
atio
n an
d co
asta
l hab
itat
sta
tus
ecos
yste
m p
roce
sses
an
d co
asta
l hab
itat
dat
a co
llect
ion
prog
ram
mes
op
erat
iona
l to
iden
tify
nu
trie
nt d
ynam
ics
and
thre
ats
from
land
-bas
ed
cont
amin
ants
to c
oast
al
wat
ers,
cau
sal l
inks
to
coa
stal
eco
syst
em
degr
adat
ion
and
habi
tat
stat
us a
t 3
prio
rity
sit
es in
th
e la
ura
area
mon
itor
ing
resu
lts,
an
alys
is a
nd re
sear
ch
repo
rts,
com
para
tive
st
udie
s an
d fin
al
eval
uati
on re
port
[yr 3
]
coas
tal h
ealt
h Su
mm
ary
for P
olic
y &
Pla
nnin
g [y
r 3]
Publ
ishe
d sc
ient
ific
pape
r [y
r 3]
unt
reat
ed e
fflu
ent
disp
osal
is n
egat
ivel
y af
fect
ing
coas
tal w
ater
qu
alit
y
reso
urce
s ar
e su
ffic
ient
ly
avai
labl
e fo
r rel
iabl
e an
alys
is a
nd e
valu
atio
n of
co
ntam
inan
t dy
nam
ics
to
prod
uce
scie
ntifi
c re
sult
s
2.2
impr
oved
syn
thes
is
of in
form
atio
n re
lati
ng
to fi
sher
ies
and
wat
er
qual
ity
stat
us a
nd t
rend
s in
the
lau
ra a
rea
volu
me
of in
form
atio
n co
mpi
led
and
shar
ed o
n ha
bita
t ar
ea a
nd q
ualit
y;
tren
ds in
cat
ch s
ize
and
qual
ity;
and
tre
nds
in
coas
tal a
nd g
roun
dwat
er
qual
ity
lim
ited
sha
ring
an
d lin
king
of d
ata
rega
rdin
g st
atus
of
fishe
ries
and
wat
er
qual
ity
in l
aura
are
a
Part
ners
hips
bet
wee
n rm
iePa
and
dep
t. of
fi
sher
ies
esta
blis
hed
to
shar
e an
d lin
k da
ta re
lati
ng
to fi
sher
ies
use
and
coas
tal
and
grou
ndw
ater
wat
er
qual
ity
dat
abas
e of
sha
red
and
linke
d in
form
atio
n,
com
para
tive
ass
essm
ent
repo
rt
colla
bora
tive
agr
eem
ents
be
twee
n de
part
men
ts
can
be e
stab
lishe
d
Suit
able
repo
sito
ry
can
be e
stab
lishe
d an
d m
aint
aine
d fo
r sha
red
data
2.3
Stre
ngth
ened
in
tegr
atio
n of
tra
diti
onal
kn
owle
dge
wit
h sc
ient
ific
inve
stig
atio
ns
Stat
us o
f rep
osit
ory
and
amou
nt o
f kno
wle
dge
reco
rds
colle
cted
lack
of r
ecor
ded
trad
itio
nal
envi
ronm
enta
l kn
owle
dge
esta
blis
hmen
t an
d po
pula
tion
of l
ocal
re
posi
tory
for t
radi
tion
al
know
ledg
e on
eco
syst
em
proc
esse
s, h
isto
rica
l en
viro
nmen
tal t
rend
s,
coas
tal h
abit
ats
and
fishe
ries
onl
ine
and
hard
copy
da
taba
se o
f kno
wle
dge
reco
rds,
par
tici
pato
ry
inte
rvie
ws,
com
mun
ity
cons
ulta
tion
repo
rts
ade
quat
e in
tern
et s
ervi
ce
to a
llow
sta
ff to
upd
ate
an o
nlin
e da
taba
se
Suff
icie
nt t
radi
tion
al
know
ledg
e av
aila
ble
to
popu
late
dat
abas
e
2.2
enha
nced
acc
ess
to
info
rmat
ion
rega
rdin
g la
nd u
se, a
nd s
tatu
s of
co
asta
l hab
itat
s an
d fis
heri
es in
lau
ra v
illag
e ar
ea
Stat
us o
f the
GiS
and
nu
mbe
r of s
ites
des
crib
edla
ck o
f rel
evan
t G
iS
data
for t
he l
aura
are
ata
rget
ed G
iS o
n la
nd u
se
and
coas
tal h
ealt
h fe
atur
ing
info
rmat
ion
on la
nd u
se,
land
and
coa
stal
sit
es o
f w
aste
dis
posa
l, st
atus
and
lo
cati
on o
f cri
tica
l mar
ine
habi
tats
and
fish
erie
s, w
ater
qu
alit
y da
ta a
nd a
reas
of
publ
ic h
ealt
h co
ncer
n
repo
rt in
clud
ing
map
s of
land
use
, pol
luta
nt
sour
ces,
rip
aria
n zo
nes,
fis
heri
es, c
oast
al h
abit
ats,
gr
ound
wat
er w
ells
, and
w
ater
qua
lity
of t
he l
aura
W
ater
len
s
ade
quat
e in
tern
et s
ervi
ce
to a
llow
sta
ff to
upd
ate
an o
nlin
e da
taba
se
reso
urce
s av
aila
ble
to
unde
rtak
e an
d co
mpl
ete
GiS
map
ping
56
Com
pone
nts
Out
com
esIn
dica
tor
Bas
elin
eTa
rget
s En
d of
Pr
ojec
tSo
urce
of
Verifi
catio
nR
isks
and
A
ssum
ptio
ns3.
n
atio
nal
and
loca
l m
anag
emen
t pl
anni
ng f
or
inte
grat
ed l
and,
wat
er a
nd
coas
tal
man
agem
ent
for
sust
aina
ble
livel
ihoo
ds
at
laur
a
3.1
man
agem
ent
stra
tegi
es
deve
lope
d to
su
stai
n co
asta
l liv
elih
oods
at
la
ura
thro
ugh
inte
r-ag
ency
coo
pera
tion
esta
blis
hmen
t of
a
roun
dtab
le
netw
ork
of
rele
vant
age
ncie
s
Stat
us
of
prio
rity
is
sues
id
enti
ficat
ion
and
man
agem
ent
inte
rven
tion
s ag
reed
up
on a
nd c
omm
itte
d to
litt
le
inte
r-ag
ency
co
oper
atio
n of
co
asta
l m
anag
emen
t at
la
ura
area
cons
ensu
s am
ongs
t re
leva
nt
agen
cies
an
d fu
ndin
g bo
dies
(e
.g
fish
erie
s,
hea
lth,
n
Go
’s)
rega
rdin
g pr
essi
ng c
oast
al
issu
es,
thei
r im
pact
on
su
stai
nabl
e liv
elih
oods
an
d re
quir
ed m
anag
emen
t in
terv
enti
ons
at
laur
a,
incl
udin
g be
nchm
arki
ng
of
curr
ent
and
plan
ned
proj
ects
an
d fin
anci
ng
leve
ls
roun
d-ta
ble
mee
ting
re
port
s in
clud
ing
list
of
part
icip
ants
, jo
int
man
agem
ent
deci
sion
s an
d pa
rtic
ipat
ion
lists
Publ
ishe
d m
anag
emen
t pl
ans
and
impl
emen
tati
on
repo
rts
[yr 3
]
exis
ting
tens
ions
bet
wee
n ag
enci
es
may
lim
it pa
rtic
ipat
ion
in a
rou
nd-
tabl
e ne
twor
k
unw
illin
gnes
s of
pa
rtic
ipan
ts
to
open
ly
disc
uss
caus
es
of
envi
ronm
enta
l de
grad
atio
n
3.2
cau
sal
links
bet
wee
n la
nd
use
and
coas
tal
heal
th,
and
sust
aina
ble
livel
ihoo
ds
and
publ
ic
heal
th
esta
blis
hed
and
unde
rsto
od
thro
ugh
inte
grat
ing
curr
ent
and
hist
oric
al d
ata
dat
abas
e es
tabl
ishe
d an
d po
pula
ted
wit
h in
tegr
ated
da
tase
ts fr
om c
oope
rati
ng
agen
cies
Poor
int
egra
tion
of
data
re
gard
ing
diff
eren
t as
pect
s of
env
iron
men
tal
and
publ
ic
heal
th
for
laur
a ar
ea
dat
a ga
ther
ed
thro
ugh
sub
-con
trac
t ag
reem
ents
w
ith
rele
vant
ag
enci
es
(e.g
. fi
sher
ies,
h
ealt
h)
to
conn
ect
aspe
cts
of
land
us
e an
d co
asta
l he
alth
to
liv
elih
oods
an
d pu
blic
he
alth
fe
atur
ing
info
rmat
ion
on
conn
ecti
on t
o tr
adit
iona
l lif
esty
les
and
nc
d’s
onl
ine
data
base
of
en
viro
nmen
tal a
nd p
ublic
he
alth
info
rmat
ion
unw
illin
gnes
s of
age
ncie
s to
par
tici
pate
in s
hari
ng o
f in
form
atio
n
57
IW
R M
PACIFIC