Transcript

Industry-speci�c forums

LinkedIn

Google Plus

Other online community sites

Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

None of these

26%

18%

16%

10%

9%

5%

4%

50%

CHANNELS USED

Testimonial

Interview withcompany expert

External analyst

Peer review

Technical spec

‘How to’ guide

Industry comparison

Pricing info

– Usage +

TYPES

– In

�u

ence

+

Supplier website

Search engine

Advice form a friend

Industry speci�c intermediary

Industry speci�c online community

Sent by a friend

Email

Online display ad

Wider advice

Social media

– Usage +

SOURCES

+ In

�u

ence –

Identifyingneed

Researching Solution

Researching Suppliers

FinalDecision

35%

25%

15%

5%

Business leader

IT

Finance

Sales

Procurement/ purchasing

AT EACH STAGE

38%15%15%

25%

24%15%

14%12%

11%9%

5%5%5%

40%

Owner/chairman/CEO/MD

Director/partner

General manager

Finance

IT

Operations

Production/technical

Procurement/purchasing

Admin/accounts

Sales

HR

Marketing

Legal

Other

IN THE PROCESS

21% 41% 4%

18% 41% 7%

19% 41% 5%

28% 42% 3% 1%

34% 33% 7% 2%

26% 41% 4% 2%

23% 43% 4% 1%

16% 38% 10% 2%

18% 33% 10% 3%

11% 42% 8% 1%

15% 33% 9% 1%

10% 22% 14% 1%

9% 28% 9% 2%

of needs

Product/service better than others

Heard of them before

Better understanding

Responded more quickly

More usefultechnical info

Provided morestrategic info

Better at building personal relationship

Communicated more frequently

Lower price

Brand stood out

Info easer to �ndon website

More creativemarketing

Website gave better impression

of the company

RATIONAL ATTRIBUTES

33%

27%

23%

27%

17%

13%

15%

15%

10%

5%

44%

45%

48%

45%

42%

39%

35%

37%

31%

16%

1%

6%

6%

5%

6%

6%

7%

9%

9%

31%

1%

1%

1%

1%

3%

2%

1%

3%

18%

Con�dent theywould deliver

Con�dent you werepaying a reasonable price

Con�dent of beingvalued

Good rapport with their reps

Pleasurable buying process

Proud to be associated with them

Excited about future opportunities with them

O�ered somethingunique

Brand presence was ‘cool’/’forward thinking’

Disappointed you had to compromise

EMOTIONAL ATTRIBUTES

CEOs and business owners are far more likely to be involved at the start and end of the buying process; IT are more likely to help with supplier selection in the middle. Procurement departments appear to have little in�uence.

1

Factual content, such as pricing and product specs, were the most frequently sought content. But opinion-based content revealed that the professional opinions of external analysts were much more in�uential than amateur reviews by peers.

Social media plays no part whatsoever in in�uencing 50% of buyers. Those who do use, tend towards industry-speci�c communities rather than the mainstream platforms of Twitter, Facebook or even LinkedIn.

‘Best price’ and ‘reliability’ were quoted as the qualities of the perfect supplier. The most quoted characteristic of the supplier actually chosen by our buyers was that they were familiar and could be trusted to deliver. Winning suppliers were also more likely to have used extensive email in their marketing.

2

4

3

Agree strongly

Tend to agree

Tend to disagree

Disagree strongly

WHAT BUYERS WERE LOOKING/HOPING FOR

Visit www.baseone.co.uk/buyersphere to download full report

Top Related