Download - High Performance Teaming
OUR GOAL IS TO BE THE BEST BUILDER IN AMERICA.
High Performance TeamingPresenters:Bob BetzSenior Vice President – McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.
Dan Fauchier, CMFSenior Lean Coach – The ReAlignment Group
Commonly Asked Questions
1. Will I be able to get copies of the slides after the event?
2. Is this web seminar being recorded so I or others can view it after the fact?
NOYESü
NOYESü
Have A Question?
How to submit questions to the Speaker during this Web Cast
Click on your Pop-Down Tool Bar
4
Agenda• Introductions• What is High Performance Teaming?• UCSD Biomedical Research Facility II
– Why and How?• Results • Metrics• Takeaways• Final Assessment• Q&A
WHAT IS HIGH PERFORMANCE TEAMING?
High Performance Teaming
5
6
What is High Performance Teaming?• Moving from vertical silos
• To Horizontal Teams– Executive– Manager– Field
Level 1 Thinking - Personal/Professional
Level 2 Thinking - Business/Organizational
Contracts
Owner Contractor
Designer
Fort Mentality
Level 3 Thinking - Project First Thinking
3rd Level Focus
Always Asking First: “What’s Best
for the Project?”
HPT allows teams to…• Focus on tasks at hand• Forecast risks• Forecast opportunities• Manage systems• Encourage professionalism• Encourage collaboration• Quickly resolve inevitable conflicts
11
What is High Performance Teaming?
• Quickly resolve inevitable conflicts
SimplifySimplifySimplify
Resolve issues at the lowest level
Elevate unresolved issues quickly through a simple 3-tier process
OLD WAY
NEW WAY
12
High Performance TeamingFi
eld
Team
can
not
Reso
lve
13
The 5 Big IdeasCollaborate;
Really Collaborate
Networks ofCommitment
Tightly CoupleLearning w/ Action
OptimizeThe Whole
IncreaseRelatedness
Courtesy LCI
UCSD BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FACILITY II
High Performance Teaming
14
15
UCSD Biomedical Research Facility II• 200K sf, 5-story Research Laboratory + 7-story Office wing,
LEED Platinum, completed 2013• Owner: UCSD• Builder: McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.• Designer: ZGF Architects• Facilitator: The ReAlignment Group• Procurement: CM/GC; Select Bid - Fee/GC’s
16
UCSD Biomedical Research Facility II• Incorporated techniques and strategies from:
– Integrated Project Delivery– Design-Build– Design Assist
• Promoted a collaborative delivery model− Facilitated a seamless transition from Preconstruction to
Construction• Lean Construction theory
– Informed the processes– New, more collaborative and reliable partnering model– Utilized pull planning for collaborative scheduling
17
Pull Planning the MEPs
QUARTERLY PRE-SESSIONONLINE SURVEYS
High Performance Teaming
18
19
Pre-Session Surveys
20
Pre-Session Surveys
QUARTERLY HPT SESSIONS(FACILITATED)
High Performance Teaming
21
22
Session Agenda• Introductions + What surprised you most in the
last 90 days?• What’s Working? What’s Not Working?
– In vertical silo teams– From survey, plus live discussion – pick top 3 & report
• Identify Risks and Opportunities– In horizontal teams: Executive, Manager, Field
• Top 4 Risks, Mitigation Strategies & Action Items• Trust Assessment• Plus / Delta• Takeaways
23
Start as Whole Group, then break out into Silo Teams
What’s Working? What’s NOT Working?
24
Then flip to Horizontal Teams
• Executive– Across all the Silos– UCSD– McCarthy– ZGF– Major Trades
25
Horizontal Teams: Risks & Opps
• Manager– Across all the Silos– UCSD– McCarthy– ZGF– All Trades– Inspectors
26
Horizontal Teams: Top 4 Risks
• Field Team– Across all the Silos– UCSD– McCarthy Sup’t– ZGF (on site)– All Trades
27
Break out into Issue Groups
28
“Live Notes” become Report
29
Goals Progress
30
Risks & Opportunities
31
Top 4 Risks/Issues & Action Items
32
Plus / Delta
33
Takeaways
RESULTSHigh Performance Teaming
34
35
Results• 6 Quarterly Meetings of 50, then 40, then 30• Individual horizontal team meetings throughout
– Removed one problem individual – mutual agreement• High Performance Teaming benefits all
stakeholders:– Owner’s management team– Facilities personnel– End users– Architect– Contractor– Consultants– Trade subcontractors
METRICSHigh Performance Teaming
36
37
Trust Assessment
8.19
Team Members’ Trust Levels
5/1/11
6/1/11
7/1/11
8/1/11
9/1/11
10/1/
11
11/1/
11
12/1/
11
1/1/12
2/1/12
3/1/12
4/1/12
5/1/12
6/1/12
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Series1
Steady in the 8’s
5 6 7 8 9 1001020304050
Team Members’ Trust Levels
TAKEAWAYSHigh Performance Teaming
40
41
Takeaways• Finished on time, on budget, Platinum quality• Open communication throughout the entire
project between all levels of the Team• Pull planning was an excellent compliment to the
to HPT process – Facilitated field collaboration• Change resolution uneventful• All issues resolved at the Management/Field Level
of the project• Goal setting by each HPT Group raised the bar on
performance for the project
FINAL ASSESSMENTHigh Performance Teaming
42
43
Final Assessment• Using High Performance Teaming
– Owner realizes quantitative results • Performance enhancements• Delivery of high quality• Meet a fast-track schedule• Collaborative budget control – target value budgeting• Maintain safe jobsite• Foster camaraderie amongst all team members
• Drives all project participants to “Project First” thinking– Streamlining team focus on– What’s ultimately best for the project.
Questions and answers
Have A Question?
How to submit questions to the Speaker during this Web Cast
Click on your Pop-Down Tool Bar
46
Following Today’s Web Cast
Watch your inbox for directions on where to go for downloading today’s presentation and recording.
To contact:Bob Betz
[email protected] Fauchier
OUR GOAL IS TO BE THE BEST BUILDER IN AMERICA.
High Performance TeamingPresenters:Bob BetzSenior Vice President – McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.
Dan Fauchier, CMFSenior Lean Coach – The ReAlignment Group
