FUTURE PROSPECTSOF INTERCONTINENTAL MARITIME
LINKS IN THE BSRWARSAW, 02.12.2011
Julian Skelnik, Marketing Director
Johann Carl Schultz (1801-1873),Long Embankment in Gdansk, 1837
Gdansk is a remarkable city owing to its over 1000-year's history, Hanseatic tradition and
outstanding architectural heritage.
OUTER PORTINNER PORT
1. General cargo (Free Zone)2. General cargo (Free Zone)3. Ferry terminal4. General cargo, grain5. Grain6. Universal quay7. Container terminal8. Scrap
9. Grain10. Bulk cargo11. Bulk cargo12. Universal quay13. Universal quay14. Universal quay 15. Bulk cargo16. Ferry terminal
17. Liquid fuel terminal18. Coal terminal19. LPG terminal20. Universal pier21. Container terminal
The quays leased and operated by Port of Gdansk Cargo Logistics SA
photo: Maciej Nicgorski, City Hall of Gdansk
PORT OF GDANSK
Total throughput in 2010:27.2 million tonnes
Value of cargo handled:EUR 25 billion
thou. tonnes
THROUGHPUT OF POLISH PORTSYEARS 2006-2010
TEU
CONTAINER THROUGHPUTOF POLISH PORTSYEARS 2006-2010
CARGO HANDLING STRUCTURE IN 2010
Total volume of 27.2 million tonnes
BALTIC SEA TRANSPORT
Year Baltic Sea TransportWorld Sea Transport
(mio tons) (mio tons) (%)
1960 110
1989 300
2000 400
2009 773
1 080
3 891
5 872
7 843
10,2
7,7
6,8
9,9
2010 834
0,02
0,3
0,140,12
0,03
0,23
0,150,13
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
Poland Finland Sweden Norway
2008
2010
CONTAINER TURNOVERPER CAPITA IN SEAPORTS
EU FUNDS IN IMPLEMENTED PROJECTSincl. European Regional Development Fund, European Social Fund and Coherence Fund
mill
iard
Eur
o
years 2007-2013
based on report by the European Commission, March 2010
SUCHARSKI ROUTE
TUNNEL
Chernivtsi
Luts'kRivne
L'vivTernopil
Luhans'k
Donets'k
Kharkiv
Sumy
Uzhhorod
Vinnytsya
Cherkasy
Odesa
Mykolayiv
Kherson
Zaporizhzhya
Kirovohrad
Dnipropetrovs'k
Zhytomyr
K y y iv (K ie v )
Khmelnytskyy
Simferopol
Poltava
Chernihiv
Ivano -Frank ivs 'k
UKRAINE
EdimeK rklareli
Istanbul
Linz
Salzburg
Innsbruck
Bregenz
Klagenfurt
Graz
Sankt Pölten W ie n
Eisenstadt
AUSTRIA
SW ITZERLAND
B e rn
Karlskrona
Luleĺ
Umeĺ
Östersund
Härnösand
Falun
Gävle
Örebro
Göteborg
Halmstad
Jönköpingen
Växjö
Malmö
Uppsala
S to c k ho lm
Nyköping
Linköpingen
Västerŕs
Karlstad
Visby
Kalmar
SW EDEN
Pamplona
Zaragoza
Barcelona
Palma de M allorca
Valencia
SLOVENIAL ju lja n a
B ra tis la v aNitra
Tren ín
Banská Bystrica
Prešov
Košice
Trnava
Zilina
SLOVAKIA
Novi Sad
B e og ra d (B e lg rad e )
SERBIA
Krosnodar
Moskva (Moscow)
Vladimir
Syktyvkar
Arkhangel'sk
Nar'yan-M ar
Murm ansk
Vyatka
Vologda
Kostroma
Yoshkar-Ola
Nizhny Novgorod
Ivanovo
Tver
Saransk
Penza
Tambov
Tula
Kaluga
Orel
Belgorod
Rostov-na-Donu
Kursk
Voronezh
Bryansk
Smolensk
Velikiy Novgorod
Pskov
Sankt-Peterburg
Petrozavodsk
Ryazan
Lipetsk
Yaroslavl'
Kaliningrad
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Br ila
Alexandria
C l ra i
Giurgiu
Ploie tiR im Nicu-VilceaBuz u
Slobozia
Tulcea
Constanja
Gala iBra ov
Pite ti
Tirgoviste
CraiovaSlatina
Tirgu Jiu
Drobeta Turnu-Severin
Re i a
Deva
AradAlba Iulia
Oradea
Zal u
Baia Mare
Bis tri a
Suceava
Boto ani
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? o ? ? ?
Lasi
Vaslui
Foc ani
Bac u
Miercurea-Ciuc
Târgu Mure
Satu Mare
Stiniu Gheorghe
B u c ures ti (B u c h a re s t)
ROM ANIA
Ponta Delgada
Olsztyn
Katowic
W roclaw
Opole
Krakáw
Biafystok
W arszawa (W arsaw)
Kielce
Kódz
Lublin
Rzeszów
Szczec in Bydgoszcz
Poznań
Gda sk
Zielona Góra
POLAND
Lilleham mer
Moss
O s lo
Stavanger
Bergen
Hermansverk
Molde
Trondheim
Steinkjer
Bodř
Tromsř
Vadsz
Hamar
Arendal
Skien
Dramm en
Třnsberg
Kristiansand
NORWAY
A m s te rd am
Arnhem
Maastricht
Assen
Groningen
's Hertogenbosch
Leeuwarden
Middelburg
Zwolle
La Haye's-Gravenhage
Lelystad
Utrecht
MO LDOVA
C h i in u
MACEDONIA
S k o p je
Klaipčda
V iln iu sTauragé
Alytus
Panev ysŠiaulia i
UtenaTelš ia i
Kaunas
Marijampole
LITHUANIA
Liepäja
R ï g a
LATVIA
Daugavpils
LA T G A L EJelgava
Z E M G A L E
P r is tina
KOSOVO
Torino
Cagliari
Trento
Venezia
Bologna
Milano
Genova
Firenze
L'Aquila
Napoli
Potenza
Bari
Catanzaro
Palerm o
Campobasso
Perugia
Ancona
Aosta
Bolzano
Trieste
R om a (R o m e )
ITALY
SAN MARINO
Eger
Gyár
Szeged
Nyíregyháza
Debrecen
Pécs
KecskemétBékéscsaba
Miskolc
Szolnok
B u da p e s t
Szeksard
Kaposvár
Szom bathely
Zalaegerszeg
Salgótarján
HUNGARYVeszprém Székesfehérvár
Tatabánya
Ioannina
Komotin i
Kerkyra
Stuttgart
Kiel
Schwerin
Potsdam
Magdeburg
Hannover
Düsseldorf
B e rlin
Bremen
Erfurt
Mainz
Saarbrücken
W iesbaden
München
Dresden
Hamburg
GERMANY
Metz
Strasbourg
Lille
Rennes
Nantes
Bordeaux
LimogesClermont-Ferrand
Lyon
Toulouse
Montpellier
Marseille
Besançon
Dijon
Poitiers
Châlons-en-Champagne
Amiens
Ajaccio
P a ris
Orléans
RouenCaen
FRANCE
MO NACO
Oulu
Rovaniemi
Mariehamn
H e ls ink iTurku
Mikkeli
FINLAND
Tartu
Vňru
Pôlva
Jógeva
Viljandi
Rakvere
Haapsalu
Kuressaare
Kohtla-Järve
Kärdla
Volga
T a ll in n
PaideRapla
Pärnu
ESTONIA
Viborg
Aalborg
VejleK øb e nh a v n (C o pe n h a ge n)
P ra h a (P ra gu e )
ZlinBrno
Jihlava
Plzeń
eské Bud jovice
Ústínad Laben
Pardubice
Karlovy Vary
Olomouc
Ostrava
Hradec Králové
Liberec
CZECH REPUBLIC
Z ag re b
CROATIA
Leuven
Arlon
Ličge
Hasselt
Brugge
Gent
Antwerpen
Mans Namur
W avre
B ru xe lle s /B ru s se l
LUXLuxemburg
VarnaShumen
Blagoevgrad
Plovdiv
Sliven
Stara Zagora
Lovech
Vidin
S o fiy a (S o fia )
Pernik
Kyustendil
Pazardzhik
Silistra
Ruse
Pleven
Turgovishte
Khaskovo
Montana
Smolyan
Veliko Tarnovo
Vralsa
Gabrovo
Razgrad
Burgas
Yambol
Dobrich
K rdzhali
BULGARIA
Mahilyow
Vitsyebsk
Homel'
Hrodna
Brest
M in s k
BELARUS
S a ra je v o
BOSNIAAND HERZEGOVINA
LICHTENSTEINV a du z
MO NTENEGROP o go r ic aANDORRA
Andorra la Vella
ALBANIA
T ira na
The Baltic Region
100 million consumers Hundreds of thousands of companies Expanding markets Growing demand Increased freight volumes Changing cargo flows Focus on intermodal solutions
Total turnover of the Baltic seaports[million tonnes]
source: Gdynia Maritime University, Baltic Transport Journal
Maritime transport of freight – national structure of the Baltic seaports in 2010
TOP 10 BALTIC SEAPORTS IN 2010thou. tonnes
thou. TEU
TOP 10 BALTIC CONTAINER SEAPORTSIN 2010
0
100 000
200 000
300 000
400 000
500 000
600 000
700 000
800 000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
TEU
FORECAST
CONTAINERSIN THE PORT OF GDANSK
ROTTERDAM
BREMERHAVEN
AARHUS
GOTHENBURG
GDANSK
ANTWERP
VALENCIA
FELIXSTOWE
GIOIA TAUROALGECIRAS
HAMBURG
ZEEBRUGGE
LE HAVRE
SOUTHAMPTON
BARCELONA
LA SPEZIA
GENOACONSTANTA
KOPER
RIJEKA
TRIESTE
SEAPORTS CONNECTED WITH ASIA BY MAERSK SERVICES
FEEDER CONTAINER SERVICES
BREMERHAVEN
HAMBURG
ST. PETERSBURG
SLAWKOWBRZEG DOLNY
GLIWICE
KOTKA
STOCKHOLM
RAUMA
GOTHENBURG
ANTWERP
GÄVLE
COPENHAGEN
AARHUS HELSINGBORG
HELSINKI
ROTTERDAM
PORT OF GDANSK
Sulphur regulations for Marine Fuel
Global sulphur limits (including EU countries not in the SECA)4.5% is maximum today3.5% from 20120.5% globally from 2020 if feasible otherwise from 2025
Sulphur limits in SECA (Sulphur Emission Control Area),which is within the English Channel, North Sea and Baltic Sea:1.0% is maximum today (from July 2010) 0.1% from 2015
The Sulphur Emission Control Area (SECA)Countries with water only in SECACountries with part of the coast in SECACountries without coast in SECAHas not signed the Marpol convention
Geographical areaof the IMO sulphur regulation
Negative consequences of IMO SOx regulations
Cost increase of marine fuel by 45-80% – average 75%
Sea transport cost increase with 30-50%
Cost increase in the range of 2-9€/tonne product
Modal back-shift ca. 30% to road and rail – increased CO2 emissions
Changed logistics flow in Europe in order to avoid the SECA
THANK YOUFOR YOUR ATTENTION