Transcript
  • Building a future for sustainable small-scale fisheries in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea Regional Conference (7 9 March 2016, Algiers, Algeria)

    Panel 5

  • PANEL 5

    Putting the principlesof the SSF Guidelinesinto practice:

    the case of the Mediterraneanand the Black Sea

    Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale

    Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty

    Eradication

  • PANEL STRUTCURE

    Introductionto session format and panellists

    Introductionof background document

    Panelistpresentations:

    1. Examples of policy and legal frameworks that specifically consider small-scale

    fisheries and that would facilitate/hinder SSF Guidelines implementation

    2. Who are the main stakeholder groups?

    3. Institutional structures: what exists and what is missing?

    4. What are key entry points for the SSF Guidelines implementation in the region?

    5. What is the scope for interactions and collaboration with other initiatives

    Comments and questions from the floor and panellist statements

    Conclusions

  • PANELLISTS

    Mr Said Chakour, Centre National de Rechercheet du Développmentde la

    Pêcheet de (CNRDPA), Algeria

    Mr Brian , Low Impact Fishers of Europe Platform (LIFE)

    Mr MoussaMennad, CNRDPA, Algeria

    Mr YassineSkandrani, Maghreb Platform for sustainable small-scale fisheries

    Mr HaceneHamdani, Mediterranean Artisanal Fisheries Platform (MedArtNet)

  • Presentation of the background paper Lena Westlund

  • What are the SSF Guidelines?

    Negotiated international instrument entirely dedicated to SSF

    A global consensus on principles and guidance for small-scale

    fisheries governance and development

    Bring together social development and responsible fisheries

    beyond fisheries: sustainable livelihoods, social stability, food

    security and sustainable social and economic development

    Complement other international instruments Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries

    Right to Food Guidelines& Voluntary Guidelines on the

    Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests

    Common grounding in human rights principles

  • 2008: First Global Conference on Small-Scale Fisheries, Bangkok + CSO

    statement

    2009: 28 th FAO Committee on Fisheries (COFI)

    expressed need for an international instrument on

    SSF

    2010: Regional consultations on bringing

    together responsible fisheries and social

    development

    2011 : 29th COFI recommends development of international instrument

    2011 2013: National, regional, international

    consultations, workshops, events

    May 2013/Feb 2014:Technical Consultation

    2014: 31st COFI

    Endorsement of the SSF Guidelines

    Key milestones in the history of the SSF Guidelines

  • SSF Guidelines development process

    South

    Africa

    May 2011

    Brazil

    Nov 2011

    Barbados

    Dec 2011

    Thailand

    June

    2011

    Tunisia

    June

    2011

    Morocco

    Jun 2011

    + Dec

    2012

    New

    Zealand

    Aug 2011

    Malawi

    2011/201

    2

    Cambodia

    2011/201

    2

    Oman

    Mar 2012Senegal

    Nov 2011

    Uganda

    Nov 2011

    Honduras

    Nov 2011Sri Lanka

    Nov 2011

    Seychelle

    s

    Nov 2011

    Germany

    Nov 2011

    India

    Sep

    2011

    Monaco

    Nov 2011

    Nicaragua

    Jan 2012

    Costa

    Rica

    Dec 2011Panama

    Jan 2012

    Pakistan

    Mar 2012

    Myanmar

    Oct 2012

    Jamaica

    Dec 2012 Bangladesh

    Oct 2012

    Viet Nam

    Nov 2012

    Mekong

    Nov 2012

    Malaysia

    Nov 2012

    Eritrea

    Oct 2012

    Congo

    Nov 2012

    Yemen

    Dec 2012

    Mozambique

    Nov 2012

    El

    Salvador

    Dec 2012

    Philippines

    Jan 2012

    South

    Africa

    Feb 2012

    Thailand

    Feb 2012Indonesia

    Mar 2012

    Colombia

    Nov 2012

    Denmark

    Marv

    2012

    Italy

    Oct 2012

    New

    Caledonia

    Jun 2012

    Cote

    Nov2011

    SSF Guidelines stakeholder consultations 2011-2013

  • Part 1: Introduction

    1. Objectives

    2. Nature and scope

    3. Guiding principles

    4. Relationship with other international instruments

    What do the SSF Guidelines say?

    Part 2: Responsible fisheries and sustainable development

    5. Governance of tenure in SSF and resource management

    6. Social development, employment and decent work

    7. Value chain, post-harvest and trade

    8. Gender equality

    9. Disaster risks and climate change

    Part 3: Ensuring an enabling environment and supporting

    implementation

    10. Policy coherence, institutional coordination and

    collaboration

    11. Information, research and communication

    12. Capacity development

    13. Implementation support and monitoring

    What do the SSF Guidelines say?

    Part 1:

    Securing sustainable small-scale fisheries

    Promoting a human rights-based approach

    Empowering small-scale fishing communities,

    including both men and women, to participate

    in decision-making processes, and to assume

    responsibilities for sustainable use of fishery

    resources

    Placing emphasis on the needs of developing

    countries and of vulnerable and marginalized

    groups.

    Part 2:

    5. Governance of tenure in SSF and

    resource management

    6. Social development, employment

    and decent work

    7. Value chain, post-harvest and trade

    8. Gender equality

    9. Disaster risks and climate change

    Part 3:

    10.Policy coherence, institutional coordination

    and collaboration

    11. Information, research and communication

    12.Capacity development

    13. Implementation support and monitoring

  • Implementation: we all have a role to play!

    Government

    CSOs/Producer organizations

    Research/academia

    Donors

    Regional organizations

    Private sector

    NGOs

    Dedicated activities

    supporting specific areas

    of the SSF Guidelines

    Mainstreaming SSF Guidelines

    principles in polices,

    strategies and actions

  • What is already happening -examples

    International FAO Umbrella Programmeto support implementation

    Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries questionnaire: new section on SSF (first reporting during 2016 FAO Committee on Fisheries)

    Regional FAO regional consultations

    Inclusion in regional policies and initiatives (e.g. in Central America - OSPESCA, Africa AU-IBAR/NEPAD, Southeast Asia SEAFDEC, Mediterranean GFCM)

    National Executive Decree in Costa Rica

    National Action Plan in Indonesia

    StrategieAquapecheAlgerie

  • Preferential access arrangements supported by legislation

    Strengthening of SSF actor organizations at regional and national levels

    Data and information to support sustainable management

    Safety-at-sea, decent working conditions (ILO guidance) and social security protection

    Integrated approaches reconciling environmental, social and economic development

    Attention to needs of postharvest subsector (investments, regulations, capacity) and market access for SSF to ripe more of the benefits of and income from the sales of their produce

    Government coordination at regional level to negotiate trade agreements with importing countries

    Understanding of international trade and local food security

    Integration of SSF in disaster risk and climate change studies, policies and action plans

    Some outcomesfrom Oman workshop: priorities Near East and North Africa

    (Oman)

    Dec 2015

  • SSF Guidelines objectivesThe role of the SSF Guidelines

    Each region and country

    will need to identify which

    topics are priorities and

    SSF Guidelines

    implementation may look

    different from one place to

    another

    Set out principles and

    guidance for sustainable SSF

    development and for

    enhancing their contribution

    to food security and poverty

    eradication

  • Putting the principles of the SSF Guidelinesinto practice:

    the case of the Mediterraneanand the Black Sea

    Some key questions

  • Panel question No 1

    Are there examples of policy and legal frameworks that specifically consider

    small-scale fisheries and that would facilitate/hinder SSF Guidelines

    implementation?

    SSF Guidelines take a holistic perspective on SSF and their needs and

    implementation has to be cross-sectoraland involve government agencies

    and partners also outside the fisheries sector itself

    Policy and legal frameworks national or regional may need to be

    reviewed to allow for addressing and integrating all the different

    dimensions of the SSF Guidelines: governance of tenure and resource

    management; social development, employment and decent work; value

    chains; postharvest and trade; gender equality; and disaster risks and

    climate change

  • Panel question No 2

    Who are the main stakeholder groups that need to be

    involved in the SSF Guidelines implementation to ensure

    success?

    Small-scale fishers and fish workers need to be directly

    involved in the governance and development of small-

    scale fisheries

    But other stakeholder groups(government agencies,

    institutions, civil society, private sector and other actors)

    have also very important roles to play

  • Panel question No 3

    What institutional structuresexist and what is missing to allow for

    the SSF Guidelines implementation, considering the need for

    effective stakeholder participation, cross-sectoralcollaboration,

    gender equality etc.?

    The appropriate institutional structuresneed to be in place to

    allow for

    Effective stakeholder participation, including also women and

    the postharvest sector

    Cross-sectoral linkages

    Appropriate fisheries stakeholder organisations are needed at

    different levels

  • Panel question No 4

    What are the key entry pointsfor the SSF Guidelines

    implementation and what would be the first practical steps

    towards implementation according to priorities and taking

    current circumstances into account?

    Entry points can be different in different local, national

    and regional circumstances

    Entry points can be found both inside and outside the

    fisheries sector

  • Panel question No 5

    What kind of interactions and collaboration with other

    initiatives would be required or desired and how can

    coherence among related initiatives (in the fisheries and

    other sectors) be ensured?

    Interactions and collaboration with other initiativeswill be

    needed to ensure both actions directly addressing the

    needs of small-scale fisheries and mainstreaming of SSF

    Guidelines principles and provisions more broadly

  • Panellist presentations

  • PANELLISTS AND CASE STUDIES/BACKGROUND PAPERMr Said Chakour, CNRDPA, Algeria:

    National Fisheries and Aquaculture Development Strategy: How to develop sustainable small-scale

    fisheries

    Mr Brian , LIFE:

    Providing a framework for securing sustainable small-scale fishing livelihoods in the Mediterranean Sea:

    Mr MoussaMennad, CNRDPA, Algeria:

    The contribution of small-scale fisheries to integrated coastal development in Algeria: The case of Fouka

    Marine, Tipasa

    Mr YassineSkandrani, Maghreb Platform for sustainable small-scale fisheries:

    Implementing the SSF Guidelines: Maghreb Platform for sustainable small-scale fisheries

    Mr HaceneHamdani, MedArtNet:

    Strengthening the role of stakeholders in the context of management and co-management schemes

    WWF

  • Mr Said ChakourCentre National de Rechercheet du Développmentde la Pêcheet de (CNRDPA), Algeria

    1) What are examples of policy and legal frameworksthat specifically consider small-scale fisheries and that would facilitate/hinder SSF

    Guidelines implementation?

  • RÉPUBLIQUE ALGÉRIENNE DÉMOCRATIQUE ET POPULAIRE

    Étude de cas: « La Stratégie Nationale de Développement de la

    développement durable de la pêche artisanale en Algérie ? »

    Présentée par; Said Chaouki CHAKOUR.

  • quelques années, une attention particulière au développement durable de la pêche artisanale

    sa Stratégie de Développement du secteur de

    SNDPA,

    A ce titre, le plan Aqua-pêche, est venu proposer une approche prospective qui se veut réaliste pour atteindre les objectifs escomptés

    1. La pêche artisanale en Algériecroissance Bleue

    Le plan Aquapêche

    de quatre principaux axes:

    Axe 1 : Promotion de la filière pêche et de la filière

    Axe 2domestique avec des produits diversifiés de meilleure

    qualité et plus accessibles pour le consommateur Mise en

    Axe 3adaptés au développement des filières de la pêche et de

    Axe 4: Consolidation de la gouvernance et renforcement de la gestion participative et

    intégration du secteur au développement des

    productive.

  • Réhabilitation et distinction de la pêche artisanale

    Le plan Aqua-pêche est

    venu appuyer les actions

    réalisées en visant la

    réhabilitation et la

    distinction de la pêche

    artisanale à travers un

    projet noyau intitulé «

    projets intégrés à la pêche

    artisanale SAIDHIRAFI».

    Objectif et actions : Réhabilitation et distinction de la pêche artisanale.

    Outils prévus: Outils et actions pour la concrétisation du projet

    dans le cadre du plan Aquapêche 2020 :Action principale envisagée: Lancement projets intégrés à la pêche artisanale SAIDHIRAFI ».

    socioéconomiques sur la pêche artisanale et mise en

    législatif et réglementaire spécifique à la Pêche artisanale

    La valorisation

    production et la réalisation de nouveaux sites de débarquements aménagés et des sites

    La formation des pêcheurs et

    système de commercialisation pour la prise en charge des produits de la pêche artisanale.

    Projet FAO/PNUD comme appui à la SNDPA notamment la pêche artisanale.

    Valorisation des espaces dédiés à la pêche artisanale pour

    activités et amorcer une dynamique de développement intégré, aquaculture artisanale, pêche récréative, pêche sportive, plongée sous marine,,.

  • Les principaux outputs du projet PNUD/FAO en relation avec

    le développement durable de la pêche artisanale.

    Résultats et contributions : leprojet à permis de:

    Rapport sur les aspects socioéconomiques de la pêche et de

    profession

    Rapport sur les forces et les faiblesses relatives aux aspects de

    commercialisation et de distribution des produits de la pêche et

    Une meilleure organisation pour plus de traçabilité etune

    meilleure valorisation des produits de la pêche. (Chaines de

    valeurs et amélioration du B-Être)

    Rapport sur la sélection et la définition des normes et des

    portuaires et aquacoles

    Le bonchoix des sites pour une meilleurs rentabilisation des

    investissements portuaires et aquacoles.

    environnementaux

    Identifier les principales sources de pollution qui affectent

    Unemeilleure valorisation de la ressource halieutique .

    Rapport de synthèse sur la Stratégie Nationale de la Pêche et de

    artisanale

    Consolideret appuyer le plan aqua-pêche et la SNDPA.

    é

    attention particulière pour la pêche artisanale

  • 2- Les politiques et les instruments: Présenté comme la seule autorité habilitée à mettre en vigueur la législation sur les pêches au niveau national, le MADRP partage la

    -bien au niveau national que local

  • La loi 08-15, un instrument de la politique et un cadre légal qui contribue à

    durable et responsable en Algérie

    Le renforcement du cadre juridique et réglementaire a été consacré par l'élaboration et la

    promulgation de la loi n°01-11 du 03 juillet 2001, relative à la pêche et à l'aquaculture, modifiée

    et complétée par la Loi n° 15-08 ,

    «

    en conformité avec les engagements internationaux

    de conservation et de préservation des ressources biologiques.»

    Un ancrage pour les régimes de cogestion des pêches,notamment , dans son article 5, sur le

    cette activité (sites de débarquement) a été intégré

  • favorisent la réhabilitation et le développement durable de la pêche artisanale à travers:

    halieutiques et aquacoles,

    aquacoles,

    à prélever,

    activités du secteur.

  • La responsable: le résultat de

    Plus qu'un engagement cette charte représente des filières

    pêche et aquaculture" pour un développement durable et responsable de la pêche et dont les principales retombées seraient :

    ,

    Organisation de la profession

    Gestion durable de la pêche et

    des ressources halieutiques

  • Merci de votre attention

  • Mr Brian

    Low Impact Fishers of Europe Platform (LIFE)

    2) Whoare the main stakeholder groups?

  • The Low Impact Fishers of Europe - LIFE

    Rooted in the 2009 Green Paper Process on the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy

    Launched in 2012, by 50 fishers from 9 European Countries to provide a voice for European fishers in decision taking processes at EU level

    Grant the right to fish to those who fish in the most sustainable way

    The Right Gear, in the Right Place at the Right Time commitment to using low impact gears and methods, and to sustaining fishery resources

    Owner on board

    Strong socio-economic and cultural linkages with communities

  • Who are the main stakeholder groups?

    Target Group/ Beneficiaries

    Interested Parties

    Administration/ Institutional Framework


Top Related