Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-i
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Appendix B
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities
B-ii Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
This page intentionally left blank.
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-iii
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
ContentsAppendix B — Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities .......................................................................................... B‑1References............................... ............................................................................................................................................. B‑1
TablesTable B‑1. Estimates of Groundwater Flow Rates at Hanford Site RCRA Facilities .......................................................... B‑7Table B‑2. Upgradient/Downgradient Comparison Values Used for Statistical Comparisons at RCRA Sites, CY 2010 .... B‑9Table B‑3. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 100‑N Area Units ............................................................................ B‑10Table B‑4. Critical Means for 1301‑N (116‑N‑1) Liquid Waste Disposal Facility for CY 2011 Comparisons ................ B‑11Table B‑5. Critical Means for 1324‑NA (120‑N‑1) Percolation Pond and 1324‑N (120‑N‑2)
Surface Impoundment for CY 2011 Comparisons ........................................................................................ B‑11Table B‑6. Critical Means for 1325‑N (116‑N‑3) Liquid Waste Disposal Facility for CY 2011 Comparisons ................ B‑12Table B‑7. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 116‑H‑6 Evaporation Basins ........................................................... B‑12Table B‑8. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑A‑29 Ditch............................................................................... B‑13Table B‑9. Critical Means for 216‑A‑29 Ditch for CY 2011 Comparisons ..................................................................... B‑13Table B‑10. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑B‑3 Pond.................................................................................. B‑14Table B‑11. Critical Means for 216‑B‑3 Pond for CY 2011 Comparisons ........................................................................ B‑14Table B‑12. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑B‑63 Trench ............................................................................. B‑15Table B‑13. Critical Means for 216‑B‑63 Trench for CY 2011 Comparisons ................................................................... B‑16Table B‑14. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch ............................................................... B‑16Table B‑15. Critical Means for 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch for CY 2011 Comparisons ..................................................... B‑17Table B‑16. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 316‑5 Process Trenches .................................................................... B‑17Table B‑17. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for the Integrated Disposal Facility ....................................................... B‑18Table B‑18. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Liquid Effluent Retention Facility ................................................... B‑18Table B‑19. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 1 ............................................. B‑19Table B‑20. Critical Means for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 1 for CY 2011 Comparisons ................................... B‑20Table B‑21. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 2 ............................................. B‑21Table B‑22. Critical Means for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 2 for CY 2011 Comparisons ................................... B‑22Table B‑23. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 3 ............................................. B‑22Table B‑24. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 4 ............................................ B‑23Table B‑25. Critical Means for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 4 for CY 2011 Comparisons ................................... B‑24Table B‑26. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for the Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill ................................. B‑25Table B‑27. Critical Means for Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill for CY 2011 Comparisons ............................. B‑26Table B‑28. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for RCRA PUREX Cribs 216‑A‑10, 216‑A‑36B, and 216‑A‑37‑1 ........ B‑26Table B‑29. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area A‑AX ....................................................... B‑27Table B‑30. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area B‑BX‑BY ................................................. B‑28Table B‑31. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area C ............................................................. B‑29Table B‑32. Groundwater Assessment Volatile Organic Compound Monitoring at Waste Management Area C............... B‑30Table B‑33. Groundwater Assessment Semivolatile Organic Compound Monitoring at Waste Management Area C ....... B‑31Table B‑34. Groundwater Assessment Inorganic Constituent Monitoring at Waste Management Area C ........................ B‑32Table B‑35. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area S‑SX ........................................................ B‑33Table B‑36. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area T .............................................................. B‑34Table B‑37. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area TX‑TY ..................................................... B‑35Table B‑38. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area U ............................................................. B‑36Table B‑39. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for the KE and KW Basins .................................................................... B‑37Table B‑40. Monitoring Wells, Constituents, and Enforcement Limits for 200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility ... B‑38Table B‑41. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility ................................... B‑38Table B‑42. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Solid Waste Landfill ........................................................................ B‑39Table B‑43. Monitoring Wells, Constituents, and Enforcement Limits for State‑Approved Land Disposal Site ................ B‑40Table B‑44. Analytical Results for Required Constituents at the Solid Waste Landfill ...................................................... B‑41Table B‑45. Results of Shapiro and Francia Test for Normality and Background Threshold Values for the
Solid Waste Landfill ...................................................................................................................................... B‑43
B-iv Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
FiguresFigure B‑1. RCRA Units on the Hanford Site Requiring Groundwater Monitoring ........................................................ B‑44Figure B‑2. Groundwater Monitoring Wells for 100‑N Area RCRA Sites ........................................................................ B‑45Figure B‑3. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 116‑H‑6 Evaporation Basins ................................................................... B‑46Figure B‑4. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑A‑29 Ditch, PUREX Cribs, and
Waste Management Areas A‑AX and C ......................................................................................................... B‑47Figure B‑5. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑B‑3 Pond and 200 Areas Treated Effluent Disposal Facility .............. B‑48Figure B‑6. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch ....................................................................... B‑49Figure B‑7. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 316‑5 Process Trenches ........................................................................... B‑50Figure B‑8. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Integrated Disposal Facility ..................................................................... B‑51Figure B‑9. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Liquid Effluent Retention Facility ........................................................... B‑52Figure B‑10. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Low‑Level Waste Management Area 1 .................................................... B‑53Figure B‑11. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑B‑63 Trench and Low‑Level Waste Management Area 2 .................. B‑54Figure B‑12. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Low‑Level Waste Management Area 3 .................................................... B‑55Figure B‑13. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Low‑Level Waste Management Area 4 .................................................... B‑56Figure B‑14. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill and Solid Waste Landfill ....... B‑57Figure B‑15. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Waste Management Area B‑BX‑BY ......................................................... B‑58Figure B‑16. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Waste Management Areas S‑SX and U .................................................... B‑59Figure B‑17. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Waste Management Areas T and TX‑TY ................................................. B‑60Figure B‑18. Non‑RCRA Regulated Units on the Hanford Site Requiring Groundwater Monitoring ............................... B‑61Figure B‑19. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 100‑K Basins .......................................................................................... B‑62Figure B‑20. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at State‑Approved Land Disposal Site ......................................................... B‑63Figure B‑21. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility ..................................... B‑64
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-1
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Appendix B — Supporting Information for Monitored FacilitiesC.J. Martin
This appendix provides supplemental information for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) and other regulated units on the Hanford Site that require groundwater monitoring, excluding Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 units (which are discussed in Appendix A). Site‑specific discussions for each facility included in this appendix are included in the main text of this document under the respective operable unit in which the facility is located.
Groundwater monitoring under RCRA continued during the reporting period (January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010) at 24 waste management areas (Figure B‑1). Estimates of groundwater velocity, hydrologic properties, and associated references are shown in Table B‑1 for the RCRA sites. To determine if a waste site has adversely affected groundwater quality under RCRA interim status regulations (WAC 173‑303‑400, “Dangerous Waste Regulations,” “Interim Status Facility Standards,” and by reference, 40 CFR 265.93, “Interim Status Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities,” “Preparation, Evaluation, and Response”), concentrations of indicator parameters in downgradient wells are compared to statistically derived critical mean values. The indicator parameters under interim status are specific conductance, pH, total organic carbon, and total organic halides. The critical values to which the indicator parameters are compared represent 99% prediction limits, which are calculated for each facility based on samples from upgradient wells. The upper prediction limits (and lower limit in the case of pH) also are known as critical mean values.
Critical mean values are recalculated annually or if the number of analyses changes. Annual recalculation accounts for changing background conditions. Changes in the number of analyses are usually the result of changes in monitoring well networks (e.g., wells are added or deleted). If changes occur in a monitoring well network, critical mean values for that facility are recalculated for subsequent semiannual sampling events using the new well network.
To reliably indicate potential groundwater effects from a facility, the sample results must be reasonably precise or quantifiable. Specific conductance and pH are field‑measured indicator parameters that are reasonably detectable and quantifiable. The parameters of total organic carbon and total organic halides, however, are much more variable and are often below detection levels. Significant imprecision and variability occur when measuring these parameters near detection limits. The variability in laboratory measurements of field blanks are used to estimate laboratory limits of quantitation during the sampling period. The limit of quantitation is defined as ten times the standard deviation of the field blank analyses (see discussion in Appendix D). For detection monitoring, the statistical comparison values for total organic carbon and total organic halides are the larger of either the critical mean or the limit of quantitation.
Table B‑2 lists the comparison values (critical mean values and limits of quantitation) used during the reporting period. Additional tables list updated critical mean values for use in calendar year 2011 for each RCRA unit where these statistics apply. Tables B‑3 through B‑43 provide supporting information for the RCRA sites, and Figures B‑2 through B‑17 show the locations of monitoring wells at RCRA regulated units.
This appendix also provides constituent lists, well network configurations, and other ancillary information for regulated facilities that fall outside of the RCRA program. Some network wells in these facilities are shared with RCRA facilities, and Figure B‑18 shows the general locations of these facilities. Locations of monitoring wells for these facilities are shown in Figures B‑14, B‑15, B‑19, B‑20, B‑21, B‑22, B‑23, B‑24, and B‑25. Tables B‑39 through B‑44 list the constituents and/or the results summaries for these facilities.
References40 CFR 265, “Interim Status Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities,” Code of Federal Regulations.
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 42 U.S.C. 2011, et seq.
B-2 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
BNWL‑1709, 1973, Collection and Analysis of Pump Test Data for Transmissivity Values, K. L. Kipp and R. D. Mudd, Battelle Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. 9601, et seq.
DOE O 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
DOE/RL‑2000‑72, 2006, Performance Assessment Monitoring Plan for the Hanford Site Low‑Level Burial Grounds, Rev. 1, U. S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations, Richland, Washington.
DOE/RL‑2003‑12, 2003, Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application, Integrated Disposal Facility, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.
DOE/RL‑2008‑58, 2010, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑A‑29 Ditch, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.
DOE/RL‑2008‑59, 2010, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Hanford Site 216‑B‑3 Pond, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.
DOE/RL‑2008‑60, 2010, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑B‑63 Trench, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.
DOE/RL‑2008‑61, 2010, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.
DOE/RL‑2008‑66, 2009, Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring for Fiscal Year 2008, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.
DOE/RL‑2009‑38, 2009, Description of Modeling Analyses in Support of the 200‑ZP‑1 Remedial DesignlRemedial Action Work Plan, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.
DOE/RL‑2009‑68, 2011, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the LLBG WMA‑3, Rev. 1, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.
DOE/RL‑2009‑69, 2010, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the LLBG WMA‑4, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.
DOE/RL‑2009‑73, 2011, Interim Status Groundwater Quality Assessment Plan for the Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area S‑SX, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.
DOE/RL‑2009‑75, 2009, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for LLBG WMA 1, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.
DOE/RL‑2009‑76, 2010, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for LLBG WMA 2, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.
DOE/RL‑2009‑77, 2010, Interim Status Groundwater Quality Assessment Plan for the Single Shell Tank Waste Management Area – C, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.
DOE/RL‑2010‑11, 2010, Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring and Performance Report for 2009 Volumes 1 And 2, Rev. 1, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.
Ecology, 2009, Chemical Test Methods for Designating Dangerous Waste, Appendix 5, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington.
PNL‑6716, 1988, Interim Characterization Report for the 300 Area Process Trenches, R. Schalla, R. W. Wallace, R. L. Aaberg, S. P. Airhart, and D. J. Bates, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-3
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
PNL‑6728, 1988, Geohydrologic Characterization of the Area Surrounding the 183‑H Solar Evaporation Basins, T. L. Liikala, R. L. Aaberg, N. J. Aimo, D. J. Bates, T. J. Gilmore, E. J. Jensen, G. V. Last, P. L. Oberlander, K. B. Olsen, K. R. Oster, L. R. Roome, J. C. Simpson, S. S. Teel, and E. J. Westergard, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNL‑6820, 1989, Hydrogeology of the 200 Areas Low‑Level Burial Grounds — An Interim Report, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNL‑8335, 1992, Applications of Three Aquifer Test Methods for Estimating Hydraulic Properties Within the 100‑N Area, T. J. Gilmore, F. A. Spane, D. R. Newcomer, and C. R. Sherwood, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNL‑8337, 1992, Summary and Evaluation of Available Hydraulic Property Data for the Hanford Site Unconfined Aquifer System, P. D. Thorne and D. R. Newcomer, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNL‑10195, 1994, Three‑Dimensional Conceptual Model for the Hanford Site Unconfined Aquifer System: FY 1994 Status Report, P. D. Thorne, M. A. Chamness, V. R. Vermeul, Q. C. MacDonald, and S. E. Schubert, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑11523, 1997, Combination RCRA Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑A‑10, 216‑A‑36B, and 216‑A‑37‑1 PUREX Cribs, J. W. Lindberg, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑11573, 1997, Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 183‑H Solar Evaporation Basins, M. J. Hartman, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑11957, 1998, Immobilized Low‑Activity Waste Site Borehole 299‑E17‑21, S. P. Reidel, K. D. Reynolds, and D. G. Horton, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑12114‑ICN‑3, 2006, RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area S‑SX at the Hanford Site, Interim Change Notice 3, V. G. Johnson and C. J. Chou, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑12114‑ICN‑4, 2006, RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area S‑SX at the Hanford Site, Interim Change Notice 4, V. G. Johnson and C. J. Chou, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑12227, 1999,Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill, J. W. Lindberg and M. J. Hartman, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑12227‑ICN‑1, 2001, Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill, Interim Change Notice 1, Rev. 1, J. W. Lindberg and M. J. Hartman, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑13014, 2000, Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Solid Waste Landfill, J. W. Lindbert and C. J. Chou, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑13022‑ICN‑3, 2006, Groundwater Quality Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Waste Management Area B‑BX‑BY at the Hanford Site, Interim Change Notice 3, S. M. Narbutovskih, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑13024‑ICN‑4, 2004, RCRA Groundwater Monitoring Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area C at the Hanford Site, Interim Change Notice 4, S. M. Narbutovskih, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
B-4 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
PNNL‑13024‑ICN‑5, 2007, RCRA Groundwater Monitoring Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area C at the Hanford Site, Interim Change Notice 5, S. M. Narbutovskih, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑13032, 2000, Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Hanford Site 200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility, D. B. Barnett, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑13121, 2000, Groundwater Monitoring and Tritium Tracking Plan for the 200 Area State‑Approved Land Disposal Site, D. B. Barnett, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑13378, 2001, Results of Detailed Hydrologic Characterization Tests – FY 1999, F. A. Spane, P. D. Thorne, and D. R. Newcomer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑13514, 2001, Results of Detailed Hydrologic Characterization Tests – FY 2000, F. A. Spane, P. D. Thorne, and D. R. Newcomer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑13612‑ICN‑2, 2006, Groundwater Quality Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area U, Interim Change Notice 2, R. M. Smith, F. N. Hodges, and B. A. Williams, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑13914, 2002, Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 1301‑N, 1324‑N/NA, and 1325‑N RCRA Facilities, M. J. Hartman, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑14033, 2002, Groundwater Monitoring and Assessment Plan for the 100‑K Area Fuel Storage Basins, R. E. Peterson, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑14113, 2002, Results of Detailed Hydrologic Characterization Tests – FY 2001, F. A. Spane, P. D. Thorne, and D. R. Newcomer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑14656, 2004, Borehole Data Package for Four CY 2003 RCRA Wells 299‑E27‑4, 299‑E27‑21, 299‑E27‑22, and 299‑E27‑23 at Single‑Shell Tank, Waste Management Area C, Hanford Site, Washington, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑14753, 2006, Groundwater Data Package for Hanford Assessments, Rev. 1, P. D. Thorne, M. P. Bergeron, M. D. Williams, and V. L. Freedman, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑14804, 2004, Results of Detailed Hydrologic Characterization Tests – Fiscal Year 2003, F. A. Spane and D. R. Newcomer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑15301, 2006, RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area T, D. G. Horton, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑15315, 2006, RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area A‑AX at the Hanford Site, S. M. Narbutovskih and C. J. Chou, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑16005, 2007, RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area TX‑TY, D. G. Horton, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑17732, 2008, Analysis of the Hydrologic Response Associated With Shutdown and Restart of the 200‑ZP‑1 WMA T Tank Farm Pump‑and‑Treat System, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
PNNL‑18279, 2009, Aquifer Testing Recommendations for Well 299‑W15‑225: Supporting Phase I of the 200‑ZP‑1 Groundwater Operable Unit Remedial Design, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. 6901, et seq.
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-5
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
RPP‑21895, 2006, 241‑C‑103 and 241‑C‑109 Tanks Waste Retrieval Work Plan, Rev. 3, J. S. Schofield, CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., Richland, Washington.
RPP‑PLAN‑26534, Integrated Disposal facility Operational Monitoring Plan to Meet DOE Order 435.1, Rev. 0, CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., Richland, Washington.
Shapiro, S. S, 1980, “How to Test Normality and Other Distributional Assumptions,” in ASQC Basic References in Quality Control: Statistical Techniques, Vol. 3, E. J. Dudewicz (ed.), American Society of Quality Control, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Shapiro, S. S., and R. S. Francia, 1972, “Approximate Analysis of Variance Test for Normality,” in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67:215‑216.
WA7890008967, 2006, Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit, Dangerous Waste Portion, Revision 8C, for the Treatment, Storage, and Disposal of Dangerous Waste, as amended, Washington State Department of Ecology, Richland, Washington.
WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells,” Washington Administrative Code.
WAC 173‑303‑400, “Dangerous Waste Regulations,” “Interim Status Facility Standards,” Washington Administrative Code.
WAC 173 303 645, “Dangerous Waste Regulations,” “Releases from Regulated Units,” Washington Administrative Code.
WAC 173‑350, “Solid Waste Handling Standards,” Washington Administrative Code, Olympia, Washington.
WAC 173‑304‑500, “Minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling,” Washington Administrative Code, Olympia, Washington.
WCH‑198, 2008, Groundwater Protection Plan for the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility, Rev. 0, R. L. Weiss, Washington Closure Hanford, Richland, Washington.
WHC‑EP‑0021, 1987, Interim Hydrogeologic Characterization Report and Groundwater Monitoring System for the Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill, Hanford Site, Rev. 0, D. C. Weekes, S. P. Luttrell, and M. R. Fuchs, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.
WHC‑MR‑0207, 1990, Borehole Completion Data Package for the 216‑B‑63 Trench – 1990, Rev. 0, S. M. Goodwin, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.
WHC‑SD‑EN‑AP‑024, 1991, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 200 East Area Liquid Effluent Retention Facility, Rev. 1, J. S. Schmid, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.
WHC‑SD‑EN‑AP‑185, 1995, Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 300 Area Process Trenches, Rev. 0, J. W. Lindberg, C. J. Chou, and V. G. Johnson, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.
WHC‑SD‑EN‑DP‑047, 1992, Borehole Completion Data Package for 216‑A‑29 RCRA Facility Monitoring Wells 299‑E25‑42, 299‑E25‑43, 299‑E26‑12, and 299‑E26‑13, Rev. 0, G. L. Kasza, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.
WHC‑SD‑EN‑DP‑052, 1993, Borehole Completion Data Package for the 216‑S‑10 Facility, CY‑1992, Rev. 0, B. A. Williams and D. B. Barnett, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.
WHC‑SD‑EN‑EV‑002, 1990, Interim Hydrogeologic Characterization Report for the 216‑B‑3 Pond, Rev. 0, M. J. Hartman, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.
B-6 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
WHC‑SD‑EN‑TI‑019, 1992, Hydrogeologic Model for the 200‑East Groundwater Aggregate Area, Rev. 0, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Borghese, C. D. Delaney, B. H. Ford, J. W. Lindberg, and S. J. Trent, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-7
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Tabl
e B
‑1.
Estim
ates
of G
roun
dwat
er F
low
Rat
es a
t Han
ford
Site
RC
RA
Faci
litie
s
Site
Flow
D
irec
tion
Flow
Rat
e (m
/day
)M
etho
d
Hyd
raul
ic
Con
duct
ivity
(m
/day
) (So
urce
)E
ffec
tive
Poro
sity
aG
radi
entb
Com
men
ts
116‑
N‑1
LW
DF
Nor
thw
est
0.05
to 0
. 90
Dar
cy6.
1 to
37
(PN
L‑83
35)
‑‑0.
0024
Gra
dien
t cal
cula
ted
betw
een
wel
ls 1
99‑N
‑34
and
199‑
N‑2
.12
0‑N
‑1 a
nd
120‑
N‑2
Nor
thw
est
0.07
to 1
.3D
arcy
6.1
to 3
7 (P
NL‑
8335
)‑‑
0.00
34G
radi
ent c
alcu
late
d be
twee
n w
ells
199
‑N‑7
2 an
d 19
9‑N
‑26.
116‑
N‑3
LW
DF
Nor
th0.
02 to
0.3
7D
arcy
6.1
to 3
7 (P
NL‑
8335
)‑‑
0.00
10G
radi
ent c
alcu
late
d be
twee
n w
ells
199
‑N‑2
8 an
d 19
9‑N
‑81.
116‑
H‑6
Eva
pora
tion
Bas
ins
East
0.32
to 8
.9D
arcy
15 to
140
(P
NL‑
6728
)‑‑
0.00
64G
radi
ent c
alcu
late
d be
twee
n w
ells
199
‑H4‑
9 an
d 19
9‑H
4‑12
B.
216‑
A‑2
9 D
itch
Sout
heas
tcIn
dete
rmin
ate
Dar
cy18
(W
HC
‑SD
‑EN
‑DP‑
047)
0.25
Inde
term
inat
eU
ncer
tain
ty w
ith g
radi
ent a
nd ra
te o
f flow
(see
Se
ctio
n 10
.3.4
).
216‑
B‑3
Pon
dW
est
0.00
48D
arcy
1.0
(WH
C‑S
D‑E
N‑E
V‑00
2;
PNL‑
1019
5)0.
250.
0014
Aver
age
grad
ient
cal
cula
ted
usin
g w
ell
299‑
E25‑
32P
as d
owng
radi
ent w
ell a
nd
wel
ls 6
99‑4
4‑39
B, 6
99‑4
1‑40
, 699
‑41‑
42,
699‑
42‑4
2B, 6
99‑4
3‑44
, and
699
‑43‑
45.
216‑
B‑6
3 Tr
ench
Inde
term
inat
eIn
dete
rmin
ate
Dar
cy18
2 (W
HC
‑MR
‑020
7)0.
2In
dete
rmin
ate
Unc
erta
inty
with
gra
dien
t and
rate
of fl
ow
(see
Sec
tion
9.3.
6).
216‑
S‑10
Pon
d an
d D
itch
Sout
heas
t0.
15D
arcy
10.4
(W
HC
‑SD
‑EN
‑DP‑
052)
0.1
to 0
.20.
0022
Aver
age
grad
ient
cal
cula
ted
usin
g w
ells
29
9‑W
26‑1
3, 2
99‑W
26‑1
4, 6
99‑3
2‑76
, 69
9‑32
‑77,
699
‑33‑
75, a
nd 6
99‑3
3‑76
.31
6‑5
Proc
ess T
renc
hes
Sout
h‑
sout
heas
t0.
20 to
20
Dar
cy15
0 to
15,
000
(PN
L‑67
16)
0.25
0.00
033
Gra
dien
t cal
cula
ted
betw
een
wel
ls 3
99‑1
‑18A
an
d 39
9‑1‑
17A
.
IDF
East
0.00
2 to
0.0
08D
arcy
68 to
75
(PN
NL‑
1365
2;
PNN
L‑11
957)
‑‑0.
0000
2Fl
ow d
irect
ion
and
grad
ient
det
erm
ined
from
tre
nd su
rfac
e an
alys
is (s
ee S
ectio
n 10
.3.1
).
LER
FSo
uthw
est
0.01
84D
arcy
39.8
(P
NN
L‑14
804)
0.37
30.
0002
Gra
dien
t cal
cula
ted
from
PN
NL‑
1480
4.
LLW
MA
‑1N
orth
‑ no
rthw
est
0.18
75 to
0.8
Dar
cy &
Tre
nd
Mat
chin
g2,
500
to 7
,500
(P
NN
L‑14
753)
0.2
0.00
0015
–
0.00
0021
Gra
dien
t cal
cula
ted
from
two
area
s:
(1) b
etw
een
wel
ls 2
99‑E
33‑2
6 an
d 29
9‑E3
3‑38
an
d (2
) fro
m th
e re
gion
al lo
w g
radi
ent w
ater
le
vels
for L
LWM
A‑1
.
LLW
MA
‑2In
dete
rmin
ate
Inde
term
inat
e‑‑
2,50
0 to
7,5
00
(PN
NL‑
1475
3)0.
2‑‑
Unc
erta
in o
f flow
dire
ctio
n. G
radi
ent t
oo lo
w
to d
eter
min
e flo
w ra
te.
LLW
MA
‑3Ea
st‑
north
east
0.04
to 0
.16
Dar
cy2.
5 to
10
(PN
NL‑
1475
3)0.
1 (P
NN
L‑14
753)
0.00
16Fl
ow d
irect
ion
and
grad
ient
from
wat
er ta
ble
map
.
LLW
MA
‑4Ea
st0.
1 to
0.4
Dar
cy2.
5 to
10
(PN
NL‑
1475
3)0.
1 (P
NN
L‑14
753)
0.00
4Fl
ow d
irect
ion
and
grad
ient
are
var
iabl
e du
e to
ef
fect
s of t
he p
ump‑
and‑
treat
syst
em.
NR
DW
LSo
uthe
ast
0.02
6 to
0.2
3D
arcy
518
to 1
,524
(W
HC
‑EP‑
0021
)‑‑
0.00
0015
Unc
erta
inty
with
gra
dien
t and
rate
of fl
ow.
Flow
dire
ctio
n in
ferr
ed fr
om p
lum
e m
aps.
B-8 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Tabl
e B
‑1.
(Con
t.)
Site
Flow
D
irec
tion
Flow
Rat
e (m
/day
)M
etho
d
Hyd
raul
ic
Con
duct
ivity
(m
/day
) (So
urce
)E
ffec
tive
Poro
sity
aG
radi
entb
Com
men
ts
PUR
EX C
ribs
East
0.00
1 to
0.6
0D
arcy
18 to
3,0
00
(PN
NL‑
1152
3)‑‑
0.00
002
Flow
dire
ctio
n an
d gr
adie
nt d
eter
min
ed fr
om
trend
surf
ace
anal
ysis
(see
Sec
tion
10.3
.2).
WM
A A
‑AX
Sout
heas
t0.
13 to
0.4
0D
arcy
1,98
1 (P
NL‑
8337
; W
HC
‑SD
‑EN
‑TI‑
019)
‑‑0.
0000
2U
ncer
tain
ty w
ith g
radi
ent a
nd ra
te o
f flow
. Fl
ow d
irect
ion
infe
rred
from
plu
me
map
s.
WM
A B
‑BX
‑BY
Nor
th‑
north
wes
tIn
dete
rmin
ate
‑‑73
to 2
,520
(P
NN
L‑68
20)
0.3
Inde
term
inat
eU
ncer
tain
ty w
ith g
radi
ent a
nd ra
te o
f flow
(s
ee S
ectio
n 9.
3.3)
. M
axim
um h
ydra
ulic
co
nduc
tivity
bas
ed o
n aq
uife
r tes
t dat
a.d
WM
A C
Sout
herly
Inde
term
inat
e‑‑
1890
to 6
,888
(P
NN
L‑14
656)
0.3
Inde
term
inat
e
The
Tc‑9
9 pl
ume
confi
gura
tion,
ion
chem
istry
co
mpa
rison
, and
Tc‑
99 tr
end
com
paris
ons
prov
ide
cons
iste
nt in
dica
tion
of so
uthw
est
flow
; Tc‑
99 tr
end
mar
kers
bet
wee
n w
ells
29
9‑E2
7‑23
and
299
‑E27
‑21
indi
cate
ave
rage
flo
w ra
te.
WM
A S
‑SX
East
to
east
‑sou
thea
st0.
07 to
0.1
4C
onta
min
ant
trave
l tim
e (P
NN
L‑13
441)
NA
NA
NA
Bas
ed o
n in
ferr
ed c
onta
min
ant t
rave
l tim
e be
twee
n 21
6‑S‑
25 C
rib a
nd d
owng
radi
ent
wel
ls 2
99‑W
23‑1
5 an
d 29
9‑W
22‑4
6, a
nd
betw
een
wel
ls 2
99‑W
22‑4
6 an
d 29
9‑W
22‑8
3.
East
0.01
1 to
0.2
7 (B
est v
alue
: 0.
088)
Dar
cy1.
33 to
14.
4 (B
est v
alue
: 6.1
) (P
NN
L‑13
514;
PN
NL‑
1411
3)
0.09
to 0
.20
(Bes
t val
ue:
0.12
)0.
0017
Gra
dien
t det
erm
ined
by
trend
surf
ace
anal
ysis
.
WM
A T
East
0.12
to 0
.19
(PN
NL‑
1773
2)D
arcy
6.11
to 9
.69
(PN
NL‑
1773
2)0.
10.
002
Flow
dire
ctio
n ba
sed
on tr
end
surf
ace
anal
ysis
. Fl
ow d
irect
ion
and
grad
ient
influ
ence
d by
pu
mp‑
and‑
treat
.
WM
A T
X‑T
YVa
riabl
e (s
ee te
xt
disc
ussi
on)
NA
NA
0.07
to 1
9.9
(PN
NL
1827
9)0.
18 (D
OE/
RL‑
2009
‑38)
NA
Flow
dire
ctio
n an
d ra
te in
fluen
ced
by
200‑
ZP‑1
pum
p‑an
d‑tre
at sy
stem
.
WM
A U
East
to
east
‑nor
thea
st0.
018
to 0
.20
(Bes
t val
ue:
0.07
7)D
arcy
1.69
to 9
.5
(Bes
t val
ue: 6
.12)
(P
NN
L‑13
378)
0.10
to 0
.20
(Bes
t val
ue:
0.17
)0.
0022
Gra
dien
t det
erm
ined
by
trend
surf
ace
anal
ysis
.
a. E
ffect
ive
poro
sity
ass
umed
to b
e be
twee
n 0.
1 an
d 0.
3, a
repr
esen
tativ
e ra
nge
for t
he u
ncon
fined
aqu
ifer s
yste
m, u
nles
s oth
erw
ise
note
d.
b. M
arch
201
0, u
nles
s not
ed o
ther
wis
e.
c. F
low
dire
ctio
n is
bas
ed o
n th
ose
dete
rmin
ed o
n a
regi
onal
bas
is.
d.
Slug
Tes
t Cha
ract
eriz
atio
n Re
sults
for
Mul
ti‑Te
st/D
epth
Int
erva
ls C
ondu
cted
Dur
ing
the
Dri
lling
of W
MA
B‑BX
‑BY
Wel
l 299
‑E33
‑49
(C42
61),
lette
r re
port,
F. A
. Spa
ne a
nd
D. R
. New
com
er, P
acifi
c N
orth
wes
t Nat
iona
l Lab
orat
ory,
dat
ed O
ctob
er 8
, 200
4.
NA
= n
ot a
pplic
able
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-9
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑2. Upgradient/Downgradient Comparison Values Used for Statistical Comparisons at RCRA Sites, CY 2010
QuarterSpecific Conductance Critical Mean (µS/cm) pH Critical Range
TOC Critical Meana,b/LOQ (µg/L)
TOX Critical Meana/ LOQ (µg/L)
116‑N‑1 (1301‑N) FacilityJan. to Mar. 2010 1,600 5.97 – 9.33 3,760/1,130 26.3/11.4July to Sept. 2010 1,600 5.97 – 9.33 3,760/990 26.3/12.0
120‑N‑1 and 120‑N‑2 (1324‑N/NA) FacilitiesApr. to June 2010 750 7.11 – 8.79 870/1,040 13.9/12.0Oct. to Dec. 2010 750 7.11 – 8.79 870/210 13.9/11.8
116‑N‑3 (1325‑N) FacilityJan. to Mar. 2010 510 7.17 – 8.76 1,250/1,040 24.2/11.4July to Sept. 2010 510 7.17 – 8.76 1,250/210 24.2/12.0
216‑A‑29 DitchApr. to June 2010 260 6.96 – 9.62 1,280/1,040 20.712.0Oct. to Dec. 2010 260 6.96 – 9.62 1,280/210 20.7/11.8
216‑B‑3 PondJan. to Mar. 2010 390 6.29 – 9.92 1,010/1,130 10.6/11.4July to Sept. 2010 390 6.29 – 9.92 1,010/990 10.6/12.0
216‑B‑63 TrenchApr. to June 2010 980 7.25 to 8.62 930/1,040 19.9/12.0Oct. to Dec. 2010 980 7.25 to 8.62 930/210 19.9/11.8
216‑S‑10 Pond and DitchApr. to June 2010 360 7.27 to 8.18 23,950/1,040 20.8/12.0Oct. to Dec. 2010 360 7.27 to 8.18 23,950/210 20.8/11.8
LLWMA‑1Apr. to June 2010 910 7.48 to 8.43 590/1,040 17.5/12.0Oct. to Dec. 2010 910 7.48 to 8.43 590/210 17.5/11.8
LLWMA‑2Apr. to June 2010 1,280 6.85 to 8.56 3,036/1,040 91.0/12.0Oct. to Dec. 2010 1,280 6.85 to 8.56 3,036/210 91.0/11.8
LLWMA‑3No statistical comparisons until new baseline is established.LLWMA‑4
Jan. to Mar. 2010 770 6.94 to 8.91 900/1,130 25.9/11.4July to Sept. 2010 770 6.94 to 8.91 900/990 25.9/12.0
NRDWLJan. to Mar. 2010 590 6.79 to 7.72 925/1,130 22.5/11.4July to Sept. 2010 590 6.79 to 7.72 925/990 22.5/12.0
a. Upgradient/downgradient comparison values (in bold) for TOC and TOX are the larger of calculated critical mean value and limit of quantitation for the respective quarter.
b. Reported values rounded to the nearest 10 µg/L.
c. Critical mean value could not be calculated because essentially all measurements were below vendor specified method detection limit.
LOQ = limit of quantitation; based on field blanks collected and analyzed in the previous four quarters
NC = not calculated
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
B-10 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑3. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 100‑N Area Units
Well Numbera Comment W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt
Contamination Indicator Parameters Other Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled
in Reporting PeriodSp
ecifi
c C
ondu
ctan
ce
(Fie
ld)
pH (F
ield
)
TOC
TOX
Alk
alin
ity
Alp
hab
Ani
ons
Met
als
(Filt
ered
)
116‑N‑1 (1301‑N) Liquid Waste Disposal Facility199‑N‑105A ‑‑ C S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑2 ‑‑ P S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑3 ‑‑ P S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑34 ‑‑ P S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑57 ‑‑ C S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 120‑N‑1 and 120‑N‑2 (1324‑N/NA) Facilities199‑N‑71 ‑‑ C S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑72 ‑‑ C S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑73 ‑‑ C S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes
199‑N‑77 Bottom of aquifer; no statistics C S S S S A S A A Yes
199‑N‑165 ‑‑ C S S S S A A A A Yes116‑N‑3 (1325‑N) Liquid Waste Disposal Facility
199‑N‑28 Information only; no statistics P S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes
199‑N‑32 ‑‑ P S S S S S ‑‑ S S Yes 199‑N‑41 ‑‑ P S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑74 ‑‑ C S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑81 ‑‑ C S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes Notes:
1. Requirements from Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 1301‑N, 1324‑N/NA, and 1325‑N RCRA Facilities (PNNL‑13914).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.
a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.
b. Monitored for Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
A = to be sampled annually
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well in accordance with WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
F = fiscal year
P = constructed prior to WAC requirements
S = to be sampled semiannually
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-11
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑4. Critical Means for 1301‑N (116‑N‑1) Liquid Waste Disposal Facility for CY 2011 Comparisons
Table B‑5. Critical Means for 1324‑NA (120‑N‑1) Percolation Pond and 1324‑N (120‑N‑2) Surface Impoundment for CY 2011 Comparisons
Constituent (units) n df Mean
Standard Deviation
CV (%) tc
Critical Mean
pH 8 7 7.771 0.3689 4.7 6.0818 5.39 – 10.15Specific conductance (µS/cm) 8 7 662.1 224.1 33.8 5.4079 1,950
TOC* (µg/L) 8 7 599.7 304.5 50.8 5.4079 2,350TOX* (µg/L) 7 6 6.090 4.281 70.3 5.9588 33.4Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from March 2009 through September 2010 for upgradient wells 199‑N‑34 and 199‑N‑57.
* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.
CV = coefficient of variation
df = degrees of freedom (n‑1)
n = number of background replicate averages
tc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and 20 comparisons
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
Constituent (unit) n df Mean
Standard Deviation
CV (%) tc
Critical Mean
pH 5 4 7.97 0.0589 0.74 9.7291 7.34 – 8.59Specific conductance (µS/cm) 5 4 480.6 34.2703 7.13 8.1216 785
TOC* (µg/L) 5 4 382.7 53.352 13.9 8.1216 860TOX* (µg/L) 6 5 4.52 1.6176 35.8 6.5414 15.9Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from upgradient well 199‑N‑71, June 2008 through August 2010.
* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.
CV = coefficient of variation
df = degrees of freedom (n‑1)
n = number of background replicate averages
tc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and sixteen comparisons
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
B-12 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑6. Critical Means for 1325‑N (116‑N‑3) Liquid Waste Disposal Facility for CY 2011 Comparisons
Table B‑7. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 116‑H‑6 Evaporation Basins
Constituent (unit) n df Mean
Standard Deviation
CV (%) tc
Critical Mean
pH 5 4 8.016 0.0840 1.05 9.729074 7.12 ‑ 8.91Specific conductance (µS/cm) 5 4 404.0 12.93 3.2 8.121637 520
TOC* (µg/L) 5 4 200.9 94.76 47.2 8.121637 1,040TOC* (µg/L) 6 5 5.205 2.303 44.3 6.541442 21.5Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from September 2008 through September 2010 for upgradient well 199‑N‑74.
* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.
CV = coefficient of variation
df = degrees of freedom (n‑1)
n = number of background replicate averages
tc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and sixteen comparisons
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
Well Number Comment W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt Permit‑Specified Other Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled
in Reporting PeriodbC
hrom
ium
(F
ilter
ed)
Nitr
ate
Tc‑9
9a
Fluo
ride
Ura
nium
a
Alk
alin
ity
Ani
ons
Met
als
(Filt
ered
)
199‑H4‑12A Extraction well C A A A A A A A A Yes
199‑H4‑12C Extraction well; mid‑depth unconfined C A A A A A A A A Yes
199‑H4‑3 Extraction well P A A A A A A A A Yes199‑H4‑8 ‑‑ C A A A A A A A A Yes
Notes:1. Requirements from Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 183‑H Solar Evaporation Basins (PNNL‑11573) and 2008 Permit modification (WA7890008967, Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit, Dangerous Waste Portion, Revision 8C, for the Treatment, Storage, and Disposal of Dangerous Waste).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.
a. Radionuclides not typically subject to RCRA monitoring but included in the current Hanford Facility RCRA Permit (WA7890008967) for this facility.
b. 183‑H wells are typically sampled in November (sampled in December 2010).
c. Well 199‑H4‑12C begin extraction operations in August 2010.
A = to be sampled annually
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
P = constructed prior to WAC requirements
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-13
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑8. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑A‑29 Ditch
Well Numbera Comment W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt
Contamination Indicator Parameters
Other Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010Spec
ific.
C
ondu
ctan
ce
(Fie
ld)
pH (F
ield
)
TOC
TOX
Alk
alin
ity
Ani
ons
Met
als
Phen
ols
299‑E25‑26 Upper unconfined C S S S S S S A A Nob
299‑E25‑28 Deep unconfined; no statistics C A A A A A A A A Yes
299‑E25‑32P ‑‑ C S S S S S S A A Yes299‑E25‑34 ‑‑ C A A A A A A A A Yes299‑E25‑35 ‑‑ C S S S S S S A A Yes299‑E25‑48 ‑‑ C S S S S S S A A Yes299‑E26‑12 ‑‑ C A A A A A A A A Yes299‑E26‑13 ‑‑ C S S S S S S A A Yes699‑43‑45 ‑‑ C S S S S S S A A Noc
Notes:
1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑A‑29 Ditch (DOE/RL‑2008‑58).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.
a. Upgradient well(s) are noted in bold italic.
b. Well was not sampled for the year due to maintenance and pump issues.
c. The first 6‑month sample from this well was missed due to access restrictions.
A = to be sampled annually
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well in accordance with WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
S = to be sampled semiannually
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
Table B‑9. Critical Means for 216‑A‑29 Ditch for CY 2011 Comparisons
Constituent (unit) n df Mean
Standard Deviation
CV (%) tc
Critical Mean
pH 8 7 8.125 0.0947 1.2 6.5715 7.46 – 8.79Specific conductance (µS/cm) 8 7 287.72 7.733 2.7 5.8588 336
TOC* (µg/L) 8 7 428.44 248.06 57.9 5.8588 1970TOX* (µg/L) 8 7 3.630 1.097 30.2 5.8588 10.4Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from October 2007 through November 2010 for upgradient well 699‑43‑45.* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.CV = coefficient of variationdf = degrees of freedom (n‑1)n = number of background replicate averagestc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and 32 comparisonsTOC = total organic carbonTOX = total organic halides
B-14 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑10. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑B‑3 Pond
Well Numbera Comment W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt
Contamination Indicator Parameters
Other Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010Spec
ific
Con
duct
ance
(F
ield
)
pH (F
ield
)
TOC
TOX
Alk
alin
ity
Alp
hab
Ani
ons
Bet
ab
Met
als
Phen
ols
699‑42‑42B Bottom of aquifer C S S S S A A A A A A Yes699‑43‑44 ‑‑ C S S S S A A A A A A Yes699‑43‑45 ‑‑ C S S S S A A A A A A Noc
699‑44‑39B ‑‑ C S S S S A A A A A A YesNotes:
1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑B‑3 Pond (DOE/RL‑2008‑59).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer, unless specified otherwise.
a. Upgradient well noted by bold italic.
b. Monitored for Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
c. Annual metals and phenol samples were missed due to lapse in sample scheduling.
A = to be sampled annually
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standard for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
S = to be sampled semiannually
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
Table B‑11. Critical Means for 216‑B‑3 Pond for CY 2011 Comparisons
Constituent (unit) n df Mean
Standard Deviation
CV (%) tc
Critical Mean
pH 6 5 8.034 0.138 1.7 7.6037 6.90 ‑ 9.17Specific conductance (µS/cm) 6 5 276 9.05 3.3 6.5414 340
TOC* (µg/L) 6 5 221.1 98.3 44.5 6.5414 920TOX* (µg/L) 6 5 3.375 1.38 40.8 6.5414 13.1Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from January 2008 through July 2010 for upgradient well 699‑44‑39B.* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.CV = coefficient of variationdf = degrees of freedom (n‑1)n = number of background replicate averagestc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and sixteen comparisonsTOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-15
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑12. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑B‑63 Trench
Well Number W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt
Contamination Indicator Parameters
Other Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010Spec
ific
Con
duct
ance
(F
ield
)
pH (F
ield
)
TOC
TOX
Alk
alin
ity
Alp
haa
Ani
ons
Bet
aa
Met
als
Phen
ols
299‑E27‑8 C S S S S A S A S A A All sampled onceb
299‑E27‑9 C S S S S A S A S A A All sampled onceb
299‑E27‑11 C S S S S A A A A A A Yes299‑E27‑16 C S S S S A A A A A A Yes299‑E27‑17 C S S S S A A A A A A Yes299‑E27‑18 C S S S S A A A A A A Yes299‑E27‑19 C S S S S A A A A A A Yes299‑E33‑33 C S S S S A A A A A A All sampled onceb
299‑E33‑36 C S S S S A A A A A A All sampled onceb
299‑E33‑37 C S S S S A A A A A A Yes299‑E34‑8 C S S S S A A A A A A All sampled onceb
299‑E34‑10 C S S S S A A A A A A YesNotes:
1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑B‑63 Trench (DOE/RL‑2008‑60).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer, unless specified otherwise.
a. Monitored for Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
b. Sampled first half of calendar year 2010, well was dropped from the network with issuance of the revised groundwater monitoring plan in June 2010.
A = to be sampled annually
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
S = to be sampled semiannually
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
B-16 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑13. Critical Means for 216‑B‑63 Trench for CY 2011 Comparisons
Constituent (unit) n df Mean
Standard Deviation
CV (%) tc
Critical Mean
pH 20 19 8.044 0.1337 1.7 4.5718 7.42 ‑ 8.67Specific conductance (µS/cm) 20 19 506.7 119.6 23.6 4.2669 1,030
TOC* (µg/L) 21 20 321.8 157.5 48.9 4.224 1,000TOX* (µg/L) 21 20 4.133 1.557 37.7 4.224 10.9Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from April 2009 through December 2010 for upgradient wells 299‑E27‑8, 299‑E27‑9, 299‑E27‑11, 299‑E27‑17, and 299‑E34‑10.* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.CV = coefficient of variationdf = degrees of freedom (n‑1)n = number of background replicate averagestc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and 48 comparisonsTOC = total organic carbonTOX = total organic halides
Table B‑14. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch
Well Numbera Comment W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt
Contamination Indicator Parameters
Other Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled
During 2010Spec
ific
Con
duct
ance
(F
ield
)
pH (F
ield
)
TOC
TOX
Alk
alin
ity
Ani
ons
Car
bon
Tetr
achl
orid
e
Chl
orof
orm
Hex
aval
ent
Chr
omiu
m
Met
als
Phen
ols
Mer
cury
299‑W26‑13 ‑‑ C S S S S S A A A S A A S Yes299‑W26‑14 ‑‑ C A A A A A A A A A A A A Yes
299‑W27‑2 Bottom of aquifer; no statistics C A A A A A A A A A A A A Yes
699‑32‑76 Quarterly samplesb C S S S S S A A A S A A S Yes
699‑33‑75 Quarterly samplesb C S S S S S A A A S A A S Noc
699‑33‑76 Quarterly samplesb C S S S S S A A A S A A S Yes
Notes:1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch (DOE/RL‑2008‑61).2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer, unless specified otherwise.a. Upgradient well noted by bold italic.b. Second year of quarterly RCRA‑specific sampling for obtaining baseline conditions. Routine monitoring frequency will be semiannual as shown.c. The sample for the last quarter of 2010 was not collected due to the stop‑work that ran from September to November.A = to be sampled annuallyC = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance
of Wells”S = to be sampled semiannuallyTOC = total organic carbonTOX = total organic halides
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-17
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑15. Critical Means for 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch for CY 2011 Comparisons
Constituent (unit) n df Mean
Standard Deviation
CV (%) tc
Critical Mean
pH 4 3 7.78 0.0584 0.75 16.3263 6.72 – 8.85Specific conductance (µS/cm) 4 3 289.7 3.9863 1.38 12.9240 350
TOC* (µg/L) 4 3 226.7 88.594 39.1 12.9240 1,510TOX* (µg/L) 4 3 5.71 0.8236 14.4 12.9240 17.6Note: Based on sampling events from August 2009 through August 2010 for new upgradient well 699‑33‑76.* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.CV = coefficient of variationdf = degrees of freedom (n‑1)n = number of background replicate averagestc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and twenty comparisonsTOC = total organic carbonTOX = total organic halides
Table B‑16. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 316‑5 Process Trenches
Well Number Comment W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt
cis‑
1,2‑
Dic
hlor
oeth
ene
Tetr
achl
oroe
then
e
Tric
hlor
oeth
ene
Ura
nium
a
Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010b
399‑1‑10A ‑‑ C S S S S Yes399‑1‑10B Lower unconfined C S S S S Missed July; resampled in August399‑1‑16A ‑‑ C S S S S Yes399‑1‑16B Lower unconfined C S S S S Missed July; resampled in August399‑1‑17A ‑‑ C S S S S Missed February; paperwork not prepared399‑1‑17B Lower unconfined C S S S S Yes399‑1‑18A ‑‑ C S S S S Yes399‑1‑18B Lower unconfined C S S S S Yes
Notes:
1. Requirements from Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 300 Area Process Trenches (WHC‑SD‑EN‑AP‑185).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.
a. Radionuclides not typically subject to RCRA monitoring, but included in the current Hanford Facility RCRA Permit (WA7890008967, Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit, Dangerous Waste Portion, Revision 8C, for the Treatment, Storage, and Disposal of Dangerous Waste) for this facility.
b. During the reporting period (January through December 2010), the 316‑5 Process Trenches wells were sampled in January, February, March, June, July, August, September, and December.
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
S = to be sampled four times semiannually (8 months)
B-18 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑17. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for the Integrated Disposal Facility
Well Numbera W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt Indicator Parameters Other Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled in
2010Chr
omiu
m
(Filt
ered
)
Spec
ific
Con
duct
ance
(F
ield
)
pH (F
ield
)
TOC
TOX
Alk
alin
ity
Turb
idity
(F
ield
)
Ani
ons
Met
als
Alp
hab
Bet
ab
I‑12
9b
Tc‑9
9b
299‑E17‑22 C S c S c S c S c S c S S S S S S S S Yes299‑E17‑23 C S c S c S c S c S c S S S S S S S S Yes299‑E17‑25 C S c S c S c S c S c S S S S S S S S Yes299‑E17‑26 C S c S c S c S c S c S S S S S S S S Yes299‑E18‑1 C S c S c S c S c S c S S S S S S S S Yes299‑E24‑21 C S c S c S c S c S c S S S S S S S S Yes299‑E24‑24 C S c S c S c S c S c S S S S S S S S Yes
Notes:1. Requirements from Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application, Integrated Disposal Facility (DOE/RL‑2003‑12) and Integrated Disposal facility Operational Monitoring Plan to Meet DOE Order 435.1 (RPP‑PLAN‑26534).2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.b. Operational parameters monitored for DOE O 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management.c. To be sampled four times semiannually (total of eight times per well each year).d. The sample frequency on all samples was changed to annually with the approval of Ecology after the April 2010 sampling event. Annual sampling will begin in CY 2011 to maintain baseline monitoring.C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance
of Wells”S = to be sampled semiannuallyTOC = total organic carbonTOX = total organic halides
Table B‑18. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Liquid Effluent Retention Facility
Well Numbera W
AC
‑C
ompl
iant
Alk
alin
ity
Alp
hab
Am
mon
ium
Ani
ons
Bet
ab
Met
als
Phen
ols
VO
A
Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010299‑E26‑10 C A S S A S A A S Yes299‑E26‑11 C A S S A S A A S Yes
299‑E26‑77 C A S S A S A A S Yes, resampled in December due to unsuccessful attempt in July
299‑E26‑79 C A S S A S A A S YesNotes:1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 200 East Area Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (WHC‑SD‑EN‑AP‑024).2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.b. Monitored for Atomic Energy Act of 1954.A = to be sampled annuallyC = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance
of Wells”S = to be sampled semiannuallyVOA = volatile organic analysis
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-19
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑19. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 1
Well Namea Purpose W
AC
Com
plia
nt
Wat
er L
evel
b
RCRA Required Constituentsc
Supporting Constituentse
Sampled as
Scheduled in 2010
Contaminant Indicator Parameters
Groundwater Quality Parameters
Anionsd
Phen
olsd
Metals, Unfiltered, Filteredd
pHb
Spec
ific
Con
duct
ance
b
TOC
TOX
Chl
orid
e
Sulfa
te
Iron
Man
gane
se
Sodi
um
Alk
alin
ity
Dis
solv
ed
Oxy
genb
Tem
pera
ture
b
Turb
idity
b
299‑E28‑26 Upgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E28‑27 Upgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E28‑28 Upgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E32‑2 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E32‑3 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E32‑4 Cross‑gradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E32‑5 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E32‑6 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E32‑7 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E32‑8 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E32‑9 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E32‑10 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E33‑28 Upgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E33‑29 Upgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E33‑34 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E33‑35 Upgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E33‑265 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Sampled once
299‑E33‑266 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Sampled once
Notes:
1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for LLBG WMA 1 (DOE/RL 2009 75).
a. Upgradient wells are noted in bold italic.
b. Field measurement.
c. Constituents and parameters required by 40 CFR 265.92, “Interim Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities,” “Sampling and Analysis.”
d. For anions, analytes include chloride, fluoride, nitrate, nitrite, and sulfate. For metals, analytes include (but are not limited to) calcium, chromium, iron, manganese, potassium, and sodium.
e. Constituents not required by RCRA but needed to support interpretation.
A = to be sampled annually
S = to be sampled semiannually
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
Y = well is constructed in accordance with WAC 173‑160 requirements
B-20 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑20. Critical Means for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 1 for CY 2011 Comparisons
Constituent (unit) n df Mean
Standard Deviation
CV (%) tc
Critical Mean
pH 28 27 8.000 0.1276 1.6 4.4137 7.43 – 8.57Specific conductance (µS/cm) 28 27 562.94 128.11 22.8 4.1540 1,100
TOCa,b (µg/L) 27 26 268.31 249.56 93.0 4.1772 1,330TOXa (µg/L) 28 27 3.880 1.703 43.9 4.1540 11.1Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from upgradient wells 299‑E28‑26 and 299‑E28‑27: June 2009 through December 2010 for all indicators; upgradient wells 299‑E28‑28 and 299‑E32‑4: December 2008 through June 2010 for pH and specific conductance, June 2009 through January 2011 (December 2010 delayed sample) for TOC and TOX; from upgradient wells 299‑E33‑28, 299‑E33‑29; and 299‑E33‑35: December 2008 through July 2010 for pH and specific conductance, June 2009 through January 2011 for TOC and TOX.
a. For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.
b. Excluding erroneous data from June 2010.
CV = coefficient of variation
df = degrees of freedom (n‑1)
n = number of background replicate averages
tc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and 68 comparisons
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-21
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑21. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 2
Well Name Purpose W
AC
Com
plia
nt
Wat
er L
evel
c
RCRA Required Constituentsa
Supporting Constituentsb
Sampled as
Scheduled in 2010
Contaminant Indicator Parameters
Groundwater Quality Parameters
Anionsd
Phen
olsd
Metals, Unfiltered, Filteredd
pHc
Spec
ific
Con
duct
ance
c
TOC
TOX
Chl
orid
e
Sulfa
te
Iron
Man
gane
se
Sodi
um
Alk
alin
ity
Dis
solv
ed O
xyge
nc
Tem
pera
ture
c
Turb
idity
c
299‑E27‑8 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E27‑9 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E27‑10 Cross‑gradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E27‑11 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E27‑17 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E34‑2 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E34‑9 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E34‑10 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
299‑E34‑12 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes
Notes:
1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for LLBG WMA 2 (DOE/RL 2009 76).
a. Constituents and parameters required by 40 CFR 265.92, “Interim Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities,” “Sampling and Analysis.”
b. Constituents not required by RCRA but needed to support interpretation.
c. Field measurement.
d. For anions, analytes include chloride, fluoride, nitrate, nitrite, and sulfate. For metals, analytes include (but are not limited to) calcium, chromium, iron, manganese, potassium, and sodium.
A = to be sampled annually
S = to be sampled semiannually
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
Y = well is constructed in accordance with requirements of WAC 173‑160
B-22 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑22. Critical Means for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 2 for CY 2011 Comparisons
Constituent (unit) n df Mean
Standard Deviation
CV (%) tc
Critical Mean
pH 6 5 7.80 0.111 1.4 9.0332 6.72 – 8.89Specific conductance (µS/cm) 6 5 1,046.4 49.27 4.7 7.7981 1,460
TOC* (µg/L) 6 5 689.1 181.3 26.3 7.7981 2,220TOX* (µg/L) 7 6 6.90 4.24 61.5 6.6568 37.1Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from April 2008 through December 2010 for upgradient well 299‑E27‑10.
* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.
CV = coefficient of variation
df = degrees of freedom (n‑1)
n = number of background replicate averages
tc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and 36 comparisons
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
Table B‑23. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 3
Well Number W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt
Contamination Indicator Parameters
Other Chemical Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010pH (F
ield
)
Spec
ific
Con
duct
ance
(F
ield
)
TOC
TOX
Alk
alin
ity
Ani
ons
Met
als
Phen
ols
299‑W7‑4 C S S S S A A A A No*299‑W10‑29 C S S S S A A A A Yes299‑W10‑30 C S S S S A A A A Yes299‑W10‑31 C S S S S A A A A Yes
Notes:
1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the LLBG WMA‑3 (DOE/RL‑2009‑68).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.
* Well 299‑W7‑4 added back to network as required in DOE/RL‑2009‑68.
A = to be sampled annually
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
S = to be sampled semiannually
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-23
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑24. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 4
Well Numbera Comment W
AC
Com
plia
nt
Contamination Indicator Parameters
Other Chemical Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010pH (F
ield
)
Spec
ific
Con
duct
ance
(F
ield
)
TOC
TOX
Alk
alin
ity
Ani
ons
Met
als
Phen
ols
299‑W15‑17 Deep unconfined; no statistics C S S S S S A A A Yes
299‑W15‑30 ‑‑ C S S S S S A A A Yes299‑W15‑83 ‑‑ C S S S S S A A A Yes299‑W15‑94 ‑‑ C S S S S S A A A Yes
299‑W15‑152 ‑‑ C S S S S S A A A Yes299‑W15‑224 ‑‑ C S S S S S A A A Yes
299‑W18‑21 Went dry in mid‑2010 C S S S S S A A A Nob
299‑W18‑22 Deep unconfined; no statistics C S S S S S A A A Yes
Notes:
1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the LLBG WMA‑4 (DOE/RL‑2009‑69).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.
a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.
b. Well 299‑W18‑21 was not sampled during the second half of the year as it went dry in July.
A = to be sampled annually
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
S = to be sampled semiannually
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
B-24 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑25. Critical Means for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 4 for CY 2011 Comparisons
Constituent (unit) n df Mean
Standard Deviation
CV (%) tc
Critical Mean
pH 14 13 7.920 0.1892 2.4 4.6981 7.00 – 8.84Specific conductance (µS/cm) 13 12 497.5 54.79 11.0 4.4215 750TOCa,b (µg/L) 14 13 304.6 126.4 41.5 4.3191 870TOXa (µg/L) 12.0 11 5.983 3.866 64.6 4.5477 24.3Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from January 2007 through July 2007 for upgradient well 299‑W15‑15, from January 2007 through February 2010 for upgradient well 299‑W18‑21, and from February 2007 through May 2008 for upgradient well 299‑W18‑23.
a. For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.
b. Excluding “R” flagged data, February 2008.
CV = coefficient of variation
df = degrees of freedom (n‑1)
n = number of background replicate averages
tc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and 24 comparisons
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-25
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑26. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for the Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill
Well Numbera Comment W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt
Contamination Indicator ParametersOther Chemical
Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010pH (fi
eld)
Spec
ific
Con
duct
ance
(F
ield
)
TOC
TOX
Ani
ons
Met
als
Phen
ols
VO
A
699‑25‑33A Top of LPU; no statistics C S S S S S A A S Yes
699‑25‑34A ‑‑ C S S S S S A A S Nob
699‑25‑34B ‑‑ C S S S S S A A S Yes
699‑25‑34D ‑‑ C S S S S S A A S Yes
699‑26‑33 ‑‑ C S S S S S A A S Yes
699‑26‑34A ‑‑ C S S S S S A A S Yes
699‑26‑34B ‑‑ C S S S S S A A S Yes
699‑26‑35A ‑‑ C S S S S S A A S Yes
699‑26‑35C Top of LPU; no statistics C S S S S S A A S Yes
Notes:
1. Requirements from Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill and Interim Change Notice 1 (PNNL‑12227 and PNNL‑12227‑ICN‑1).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless otherwise specified.
a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.
b. The first semiannual sample for the January through April 2010 time period was not collected for well 699‑25‑34A because of limited resources by the sampling teams in the January through July 2010 time period.
A = to be sampled annually
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
LPU = low‑permeability unit in upper portion of Ringold Formation (within HSU‑5)
S = to be sampled semiannually
TOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
VOA = volatile organic analysis
B-26 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑27. Critical Means for Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill for CY 2011 Comparisons
Constituent (unit) n df Mean
Standard Deviation
CV (%) tc
Critical Mean
pH 8 7 7.306 0.0521 0.7 6.4295 6.95 – 7.66Specific conductance (µS/cm) 8 7 529.6 6.027 1.1 5.7282 570
TOC* (µg/L) 8 7 251.3 124.4 49.5 5.7282 1,010TOX* (µg/L) 8 7 3.722 1.671 44.9 5.7282 13.9Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from January 2009 through July 2010 for upgradient wells 699‑26‑34A and 699‑26‑35A.* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.CV = coefficient of variationdf = degrees of freedom (n‑1)n = number of background replicate averagestc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and 28 comparisonsTOC = total organic carbon
TOX = total organic halides
Table B‑28. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for RCRA PUREX Cribs 216‑A‑10, 216‑A‑36B, and 216‑A‑37‑1
Well Numbera Comment W
AC
‑C
ompl
iant
Primary RCRA Constituent
Supporting Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010 Nitr
ate
Ani
ons
Met
als
Phen
ols
299‑E17‑1 216‑A‑10 P S S S A Yes299‑E17‑14 216‑A‑36B C Q Q Q A Yes299‑E17‑16 216‑A‑36B C S S S A Yes299‑E17‑18 216‑A‑36B C S S S A Yes299‑E17‑19 216‑A‑10 C S S S A Yes299‑E24‑16 216‑A‑10 C Q Q Q A Yes299‑E24‑18 Upgradient C S S S A Yes299‑E25‑17 216‑A‑37‑1 P S S S A Yes299‑E25‑19 216‑A‑37‑1 P Q Q Q A Yes299‑E25‑31 Upgradient C S S S A Yes699‑37‑47A Downgradient C S S S A Yes
Additional wells Far‑field ‑‑ b b ‑‑ ‑‑ See Appendix A for 200‑PO‑1Notes:1. Requirements from Combination RCRA Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑A‑10, 216‑A‑36B, and 216‑A‑37‑1 PUREX Cribs (PNNL‑11523).2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.b. Far‑field wells sampled annually to triennially in conjunction with the 200‑PO‑1 OU.A = to be sampled annuallyC = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance
of Wells”P = constructed prior to WAC requirementsQ = to be sampled quarterly
S = to be sampled semiannually
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-27
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑29. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area A‑AX
Well Numbera W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt Site‑Specific Constituents
Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010Nitr
ate
Sodi
um
Sulfa
te
TOC
Chr
omiu
m
Lea
d
Alk
alin
ity
Ani
ons
Met
als
Tc‑9
9b
299‑E24‑20 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E24‑22 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E24‑33 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Noc
299‑E25‑2 P Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Noc
299‑E25‑40 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E25‑41 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E25‑93 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E25‑94 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E25‑236 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes
Notes:
1. Requirements from RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area A‑AX at the Hanford Site (PNNL‑15315).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.
a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.
b. Atomic Energy Act of 1954 parameter.
c. Samples not collected during fourth quarter as a result of the site‑wide stop work.
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells
P = constructed prior to WAC requirements
Q = to be sampled quarterly
TOC = total organic carbon
B-28 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑30. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area B‑BX‑BY
Well Number* W
AC
‑C
ompl
iant
RCRA Parameters AEA Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled in 2010A
lkal
inity
Ani
ons
Cya
nide
Met
als
Gam
ma
Tc‑9
9
Triti
um
Ura
nium
299‑E28‑8 P Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes
299‑E33‑7 P S S S S S S S SMissed second half of CY 2010 sample due to water below the pump inlet. Maintenance to
lower pump.
299‑E33‑9 P S S S S S S S S Missed second half of CY 2010 sample due to work stoppage.
299‑E33‑15 P S S S S S S S SDue to the work stoppage the second
semiannual sample was not collected until 1/4/11.
299‑E33‑16 P Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Third quarter sample missed due to maintenance issues.
299‑E33‑17 P A A A A ‑‑ A A A Yes299‑E33‑18 P Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑20 P A A A A ‑‑ A A A Yes299‑E33‑21 P A A A A ‑‑ A A A Yes
299‑E33‑26 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Fourth quarter sample missed due to maintenance issues.
299‑E33‑31 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑32 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑38 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑39 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑41 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑42 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑43 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑44 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑47 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑48 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑49 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes
299‑E33‑334 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑335 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑337 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes
299‑E33‑338 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Due to the work stoppage the fourth quarter sample was not collected until 1/5/11.
299‑E33‑339 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes
299‑E33‑205 C S S S S S S S S Missed second half of CY 2010 due to work stoppage.
299‑E33‑341 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Missed first quarter sample due to sample schedule lapse.
299‑E33‑342 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑343 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes
299‑E33‑344 C S S S S Q S S SWell was scheduled for annual sampling only during CY 2010. Perched well that has not been formally accepted into the network.
299‑E33‑345 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-29
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑31. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area C
Well Namea Purpose W
ell
Con
stru
ctio
n St
anda
rd
pH Spec
ific
Con
duct
ance
Alk
alin
ity
Ani
ons
Cya
nide
Met
alsb ,
Unfi
ltere
d,
Filte
red
Wat
er L
evel
Sampled as Scheduled in 2010299‑E27‑4 Downgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q‑ Yes299‑E27‑7 Upgradient N Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E27‑12 Upgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Sampled in three of four quarters299‑E27‑13 Downgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E27‑14 Downgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E27‑15 Upgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E27‑21 Downgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E27‑22 Upgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q‑ Yes299‑E27‑23 Downgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E27‑155 Cross‑ to downgradient C SA SA SA SA SA SA SA Yes299‑E27‑24 Downgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E27‑25 Cross‑gradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q YesNotes:1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Quality Assessment Plan for the Single‑Shell Waste Management Area C (DOE/RL‑2009‑77).2. Water levels are measured in all wells before sampling. T he measurement frequency is provided.3. WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells.”a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.b. Metals for groundwater quality include iron, manganese, and sodium.C = well constructed as a WAC 173‑160 resource protection wellsN = well constructed before requirements of WAC 173‑160 were applicable at the Hanford SiteQ = quarterly
SA = semiannually
Table B‑30. (Cont.)
Well Number* W
AC
‑C
ompl
iant
RCRA Parameters AEA Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled in 2010A
lkal
inity
Ani
ons
Cya
nide
Met
als
Gam
ma
Tc‑9
9
Triti
um
Ura
nium
Notes:1. Requirements from Groundwater Quality Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area B‑BX‑BY at the Hanford Site (PNNL‑13022‑ICN‑3).2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer.* Gradient nearly flat; indeterminate flow direction; no upgradient wells defined.A = to be sampled annuallyC = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance
of Wells”P = constructed prior to WAC requirementsQ = to be sampled quarterly
S = to be sampled semiannually
B-30 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑32. Groundwater Assessment Volatile Organic Compound Monitoring at Waste Management Area C
Dangerous Waste Constituent Namea CAS #
Wells
299‑
E27
‑4
299‑
E27
‑7
299‑
E27
‑12
299‑
E27
‑13
299‑
E27
‑14
299‑
E27
‑15
299‑
E27
‑21
299‑
E27
‑22
299‑
E27
‑23
299‑
E27
‑155
Prop
osed
U
pgra
dien
t Wel
lb
Prop
osed
D
owng
radi
ent
Wel
lb
1,1‑Dichloroethane 75‑34‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,1‑Dichloroethylene 75‑35‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,1,1‑Trichloroethane 71‑55‑6 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,1,2,2‑Tetrachloroethane 79034‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,1,2‑Trichloroethane 79‑00‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,2‑Dibromoethane 106‑93‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,2‑Dichloroethane 107‑06‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,2‑Dichloropropane 78‑87‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,2,4‑Trichlorobenzene 120‑82‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,4‑Dichlorobenzene 106‑46‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,4‑Dioxane 123‑91‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X2‑Butanone (MEK) 78‑93‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X X2‑Hexanone 591‑78‑6 X X X X X X X X X X X X2‑Propanone (Acetone) 67‑64‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X3‑Chloropropene 107‑05‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X4‑Methyl‑2‑petanone 108‑10‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X XAcetonitrile 75‑05‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X XAcrolein 107‑02‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X XAcrylonitrile 107‑13‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X XBenzene 71‑43‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X XBromomethane 74‑83‑9 X X X X X X X X X X X XCarbon disulfide 75‑15‑0 X X X X X X X X X X X XCarbon tetrachloride 56‑23‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X XChlorobenzene 108‑90‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X XChloroethene 75‑01‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X XChloroform 67‑66‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X XChloromethane 74‑87‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X XCis‑1,3‑dichloropropene 10061‑01‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X XDichlorodifluoro‑methane 75‑71‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X XDichloromethane 75‑09‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X XEthylbenzene 100‑41‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X XEthyl cyanide 107‑12‑0 X X X X X X X X X X X XMethacrylonitrile 126‑98‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X XStyrene 100‑42‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X XTetrachloroethene 127‑18‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X XToluene 108‑88‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X XTrans‑1,3‑dichloropropene 10061‑02‑6 X X X X X X X X X X X XTrichloroethylene 79‑01‑06 X X X X X X X X X X X XTrichlorofluoro‑methane 75‑69‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X XXylenes 1330‑20‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X Xa. Constituents collected and analyzed during the December sampling event. Constituents considered dangerous constituents, as defined in WAC 173‑303‑645(4) and based on the logic discussed in Section 9.2, will be retained for quarterly sampling for the first year, semiannual sampling in the second year, and annually thereafter, or until no longer required.
b. Wells will be sampled for constituents in the December sampling event if sample‑ready; otherwise, the wells are sampled in March.
CAS = Chemical Abstract Services
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-31
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑33. Groundwater Assessment Semivolatile Organic Compound Monitoring at Waste Management Area C
Dangerous Waste Constituent Namea CAS #
Wells
299‑
E27
‑4
299‑
E27
‑7
299‑
E27
‑12
299‑
E27
‑13
299‑
E27
‑14
299‑
E27
‑15
299‑
E27
‑21
299‑
E27
‑22
299‑
E27
‑23
299‑
E27
‑155
Prop
osed
U
pgra
dien
t W
ellb
Prop
osed
D
owng
radi
ent
Wel
lb
1,2‑Dichlorobenzene 95‑50‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X
1,3‑Dichlorobenzene 541‑73‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X
2‑Chlorophenol 95‑57‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X X
2‑Methylphenol 95‑48‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X X
2‑Nitrophenol 88‑75‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X X
2‑sec‑Butyl‑4,6‑dinitrophenol 88‑85‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X X
2,4‑Dinitrotoluene 121‑14‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X
2,4,5‑Trichlorophenol 95‑95‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X X
2,4,6‑Trichlorophenol 88‑06‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X
3‑Methylphenol 108‑39‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X X
4‑Methylphenol 106‑44‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Acenaphthene 83‑32‑9 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Acetophenone 98‑86‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Aldrin 309‑00‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Alpha‑BHC 319‑84‑6 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Benzo[a]pyrene 50‑32‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Beta‑BHC 319‑85‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Butylbenzylphthalate 85‑68‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Dibenzene[a,h]anthracene 53‑70‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Dieldrin 60‑57‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Di‑n‑butylphthalate 84‑74‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Diphenylamine 122‑39‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Endrin 72‑20‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Fluoranthene 206‑44‑0 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Gamma‑BHC 58‑89‑9 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Heptachlor 76‑44‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Hexachlorobenzene 118‑74‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Hexachlorobutadiene 87‑68‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Hexachloroethane 67‑72‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Isodrin 465‑73‑6 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Naphthalene 91‑20‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Nitrobenzene 98‑95‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X X
N‑Nitrosodi‑methylamine 62‑75‑9 X X X X X X X X X X X X
N‑Nitrosodi‑propylamine 62164‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X X
n‑Nitrosomorpholine 59‑89‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X
p‑Chorol‑m‑cresol 59‑50‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Pentachloronitro‑benzene 82‑68‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Pentachlorophenol 87‑86‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Phenol 108‑95‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Pyrene 129‑00‑0 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Pyridine 110‑86‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Toxaphene 8001‑35‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X
B-32 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑34. Groundwater Assessment Inorganic Constituent Monitoring at Waste Management Area C
Dangerous Waste Constituent
Namea CAS #
Wells
299‑
E27
‑4
299‑
E27
‑7
299‑
E27
‑12
299‑
E27
‑13
299‑
E27
‑14
299‑
E27
‑15
299‑
E27
‑21
299‑
E27
‑22
299‑
E27
‑23
299‑
E27
‑155
Prop
osed
U
pgra
dien
t W
ellb
Prop
osed
D
owng
radi
ent
Wel
lb
Antimony 7440‑36‑0 X X X X X X X X X X X XArsenic 7440‑38‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X XBarium 7440‑39‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X XBeryllium 7440‑41‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X XCadmium 7440‑43‑9 X X X X X X X X X X X XChromium 7440‑47‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X XCobalt 7440‑48‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X XCopper 7440‑50‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X XCyanide 57‑12‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X XLead 7439‑92‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X XMercury 7439‑97‑6 X X X X X X X X X X X XNickel 7440‑02‑0 X X X X X X X X X X X XSelenium 7782‑49‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X XSilver 7440‑22‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X XSulfide 18496‑25‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X XThallium 7440‑28‑0 X X X X X X X X X X X XTin 7440‑31‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X XVanadium 7440‑62‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X XZinc 7440‑66‑6 X X X X X X X X X X X Xa. Constituents will be collected and analyzed during December sampling event. Constituents considered dangerous constituents, as defined in WAC 173‑303‑645(4) and according to the logic discussed in Section 9.2, will be retained for quarterly sampling for the first year, semiannual sampling in the second year, and annually thereafter, or until no longer required.
b. Wells will be sampled for constituents in the December sampling event if sample‑ready; otherwise, the wells are sampled in March.
CAS = Chemical Abstract Services
Table B‑33. (Cont.)
Dangerous Waste Constituent Namea CAS #
Wells
299‑
E27
‑4
299‑
E27
‑7
299‑
E27
‑12
299‑
E27
‑13
299‑
E27
‑14
299‑
E27
‑15
299‑
E27
‑21
299‑
E27
‑22
299‑
E27
‑23
299‑
E27
‑155
Prop
osed
U
pgra
dien
t W
ellb
Prop
osed
D
owng
radi
ent
Wel
lb
a. Constituents collected and analyzed during December sampling event. Constituents considered dangerous constituents, as defined in WAC 173‑303‑645(4) and per the logic discussed in Section 9.2, will be retained for quarterly sampling for the first year, semiannual sampling in the second year, and annually thereafter, or until no longer required.b. Wells will be sampled for constituents in the December sampling event if sample‑ready; otherwise, the wells are sampled in March.CAS = Chemical Abstract Services
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-33
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑35. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area S‑SX
Well Numbera W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt
RCRA Supporting Constituents
Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010Chr
omiu
m
Nitr
ate
Alk
alin
ity
Ani
ons
Met
als
Se‑7
9
Tc‑9
9
Triti
um
Ura
nium
Gam
ma
299‑W22‑26 b P Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑44 C Q Q Q Q Q A Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑45 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑47 C Q Q Q Q Q A Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑48 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑49 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑50 C Q Q Q Q Q A Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑69 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑72 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑80 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑81 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑82 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑83 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑84 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes
299‑W22‑85 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ No; third quarter missed due to maintenance issue and stop work
299‑W22‑86 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑89c C 2 2 2 2 2 ‑‑ 2 1 1 ‑‑ Yes299‑W23‑15 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W23‑19 C Q Q Q Q Q A Q A A A Yes
299‑W23‑20 C Q Q Q Q Q A Q A A ‑‑ No; fourth quarter missed due to stop work
299‑W23‑21 C Q Q Q Q Q A Q A A ‑‑ YesNotes:
1. Requirements from RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area S‑SX at the Hanford Site, Interim Change Notice 4 (PNNL‑12114‑ICN‑4).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer.
a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.
b. Sampled during the reporting period; was added to the revised monitoring plan (DOE/RL‑2009‑73) for sampling in 2011.
c. New well installed in June 2010; sampled the indicated number of times; was added to the revised monitoring plan (DOE/RL‑2009‑73) for sampling in 2011.
A = to be sampled annually
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
P = constructed prior to WAC requirements
Q = to be sampled quarterly
B-34 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑36. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area T
Well Number* Comment W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt
Constituents of Concern
Supporting Groundwater Quality Constituents and AEA Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010Chr
omiu
m
(Tot
al, F
ilter
ed)
Nitr
ate
Alk
alin
ity
Ani
ons
Gam
ma
Alp
ha
Bet
a
I‑12
9
Met
als
Tc‑9
9
Triti
um
299‑W10‑1 ‑‑ P Q Q Q Q A A ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑W10‑4 Not sampled second quarter P Q Q Q Q A A A ‑‑ Q Q Q No299‑W10‑8 Not sampled fourth quarter P Q Q Q Q ‑‑ A A ‑‑ Q Q Q No
299‑W10‑22 Removed from network in the revised monitoring plan C S S S S ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ S S S No
299‑W10‑23 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ A A ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑W10‑24 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q S S S ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑W10‑28 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ A A ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes
299‑W11‑7 Removed from network in the revised monitoring plan P S S S S ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ S S S No
299‑W11‑12 Not sampled first and fourth quarters P Q Q Q Q ‑‑ A A ‑‑ Q Q Q No
299‑W11‑39 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q S S S ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑W11‑40 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ A A ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑W11‑41 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q S S S A Q Q Q Yes299‑W11‑42 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q S S S ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes
299‑W11‑45
Extraction well; screened 8.5 to13 meters below water
table
Not sampled third and fourth quarters
C Q Q Q Q A A A ‑‑ Q Q Q No
299‑W11‑46 Extraction well; screened 6 to 12 meters below water table C Q Q Q Q S S S ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes
299‑W11‑47 Screened 9 to 18 meters below water table C Q Q Q Q S S S A Q Q Q Yes
Notes:
1. Requirements from RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area T (PNNL‑15301).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.
* Bold italic indicates upgradient well.
A = to be sampled annually
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
P = constructed prior to WAC requirements
Q = to be sampled quarterly
S = to be sampled semiannually
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-35
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑37. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area TX‑TY
Well Numbera Comment W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt
RCRA Parameters
Supporting Groundwater Quality Constituents and AEA Parameters
Sampled as
Scheduled in 2010C
hrom
ium
(T
otal
, Filt
ered
)
Nitr
ate
Alk
alin
ity
Ani
ons
Alp
ha
Bet
a
Gam
ma
I‑12
9
Met
als
Sr‑9
0
Tc‑9
9
Triti
um
299‑W10‑26 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q A A A ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑W10‑27 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q A A A ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes
299‑W14‑6 Well went dry in fourth quarter P Q Q Q Q ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ Q Q Q No
299‑W14‑11 Screened 11 to 14.6 m below water table C Q Q Q Q A A S Q Q A Q Q Yes
299‑W14‑13 Not sampled in second, third, and fourth quarters C Q Q Q Q A A S Q Q A Q Q No
299‑W14‑14 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q A A A ‑‑ Q ‑‑ Q Q Yes299‑W14‑15 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q S S A Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Yes299‑W14‑16 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q S S ‑‑ Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Yes
299‑W14‑17 Not sampled in second and fourth quarters C Q Q Q Q A A ‑‑ Q Q ‑‑ Q Q No
299‑W14‑18 Not sampled in second quarter C Q Q Q Q A A A Q Q ‑‑ Q Q No
299‑W14‑19 Not sampled in second quarter C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ ‑‑ A ‑‑ Q ‑‑ Q Q No
299‑W15‑40 Extraction well C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ Q ‑‑ Q Q Yes299‑W15‑41 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q A A A S Q ‑‑ Q Q Yes
299‑W15‑44bExtraction well; not
sampled in first and second quarters
C Q Q Q Q A A A S Q ‑‑ Q Q No
299‑W15‑763 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q A A A ‑‑ Q ‑‑ Q Q Yes
299‑W15‑765 Extraction well; not sampled in second quarter C Q Q Q Q A A A S Q ‑‑ Q Q No
Notes:
1. Requirements from RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area TX‑TY (PNNL‑16005).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer, unless specified otherwise.
a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.
b. Well 299‑W15‑44 was taken out of service as an extraction well and converted to a monitoring well by third quarter CY 2010.
A = to be sampled annually
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
P = constructed prior to WAC requirements
Q = to be sampled quarterlyS = to be sampled semiannually
B-36 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑38. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area U
Well Numbera W
AC
‑Com
plia
ntRCRA Supporting Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled in 2010bC
hrom
ium
Nitr
ate
Alk
alin
ity
Ani
ons
Met
als
Tc‑9
9
Gro
ss A
lpha
/B
eta
Gam
ma
299‑W18‑30 C Q Q Q Q Q Q A A Yes
299‑W18‑31 C Q Q Q Q Q Q A A Dry in fiscal year 2008
299‑W18‑40 C Q Q Q Q Q Q A A Yes
299‑W19‑12 C Q Q Q Q Q Q A A Yes
299‑W19‑41 C Q Q Q Q Q Q A A Yes
299‑W19‑42 C Q Q Q Q Q Q A A Yes
299‑W19‑44 C Q Q Q Q Q Q A A No; first quarter missed due to maintenance issue
299‑W19‑45 C Q Q Q Q Q Q A A Yes
299‑W19‑47 C Q Q Q Q Q Q A A YesNotes:
1. Requirement from Groundwater Quality Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area U, Interim Change Notice 2 (PNNL‑13612‑ICN‑2).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer.
a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.
b. Fourth quarter sampling delayed from October to November/December for all wells due to stop work.
A = to be sampled annually
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
Q = to be sampled quarterly
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-37
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Tabl
e B
‑39.
Mon
itorin
g W
ells
and
Con
stitu
ents
for t
he K
E an
d K
W B
asin
s
Wel
lC
omm
ent
WAC‑Compliant
Con
tam
inan
ts o
f Con
cern
Sam
pled
as
Sche
dule
d in
201
0
Gross Alpha
Anions
Gross Beta
C‑14
Metals
Sr‑90
Tc‑99
Tritium
Alkalinity
Uranium (Total)
VOA
KE
Bas
in
199‑
K‑2
9‑‑
PQ
/MQ
Q/M
A/S
A/S
0/S
0/Q
M0/
S‑‑
‑‑N
o; sa
mpl
ed in
Dec
embe
r 201
0. D
ecom
mis
sion
ed in
D
ecem
ber 2
010
199‑
K‑3
0‑‑
PQ
A/S
S‑‑
0/S
Q0/
S‑‑
‑‑N
o; sa
mpl
ed in
Janu
ary,
Apr
il, a
nd D
ecem
ber 2
010.
D
ecom
mis
sion
ed in
Dec
embe
r 201
019
9‑K
‑32A
‑‑C
QA
/SA
/S‑‑
A/S
Q0/
S‑‑
‑‑Ye
s; sa
mpl
ed in
Mar
ch, J
une,
Sep
tem
ber,
and
Dec
embe
r 201
019
9‑K
‑110
A‑‑
CS
SS
‑‑A
/S‑‑
‑‑S
0/S
‑‑‑‑
Yes;
sam
pled
in A
pril
and
Dec
embe
r 201
0
199‑
K‑1
11A
‑‑C
Q/Q
/QA
A/S
‑‑A
/SQ
/Q0/
S‑‑
‑‑Ye
s; sa
mpl
ed in
Feb
ruar
y, M
arch
, Apr
il, Ju
ne, J
uly,
Sep
tem
ber,
and
Dec
embe
r 201
019
9‑K
‑141
‑‑C
0/S
0/S
0/S
0/S
0/S
0/S
0/S
0/S
0/S
‑‑‑‑
Yes;
sam
pled
in F
ebru
ary
and
July
201
019
9‑K
‑142
‑‑C
0/S
0/S
0/S
0/S
0/S
0/S
0/S
0/S
0/S
0/S
‑‑Ye
s; sa
mpl
ed in
Mar
ch, J
une,
Sep
tem
ber,
and
Dec
embe
r 201
0K
W B
asin
199‑
K‑3
1N
ot in
clud
ed in
m
onito
ring
plan
P0/
S0/
S0/
S‑‑
0/S
‑‑0/
A0/
S0/
A‑‑
‑‑Ye
s; sa
mpl
ed in
Mar
ch a
nd Ju
ne 2
010
199‑
K‑3
4‑‑
CQ
AS/
QA
AQ
0/A
0/A
‑‑Ye
s; sa
mpl
ed in
Apr
il, Ju
ne, S
epte
mbe
r, an
d D
ecem
ber 2
010
199‑
K‑1
06A
‑‑C
QA
/SS/
Q‑‑
0/Q
Q0/
S‑‑
0/S
No;
sam
pled
in M
arch
and
June
201
019
9‑K
‑107
A‑‑
CQ
AS/
QA
AQ
0/A
0/A
‑‑Ye
s; sa
mpl
ed in
Janu
ary,
Apr
il, Ju
ly, a
nd D
ecem
ber 2
010
199‑
K‑1
08A
‑‑C
SS
S0/
SS
‑‑‑‑
S0/
S‑‑
‑‑Ye
s; sa
mpl
ed in
Janu
ary,
Mar
ch, J
une,
Aug
ust,
Sept
embe
r, an
d D
ecem
ber 2
010
199‑
K‑1
32‑‑
CS/
QS/
QS/
QA
/SS/
Q‑‑
0/S
S/Q
0/S
‑‑0/
SYe
s; sa
mpl
ed in
Feb
ruar
y, Ju
ne, A
ugus
t, an
d N
ovem
ber 2
010
Not
es:
1. R
equi
rem
ents
from
Gro
undw
ater
Mon
itori
ng a
nd A
sses
smen
t Pla
n fo
r the
100
‑K A
rea
Fuel
Sto
rage
Bas
ins (
PNN
L‑14
033)
.2.
Fre
quen
cy re
quire
d un
der m
onito
ring
plan
is li
sted
firs
t. S
ome c
onst
ituen
ts ar
e sam
pled
mor
e fre
quen
tly d
urin
g ba
sin
clea
nout
; tho
se fr
eque
ncie
s are
list
ed af
ter t
he sl
ash.
For
exam
ple,
“0
/Q”
mea
ns n
ot re
quire
d un
der m
onito
ring
plan
but
cur
rent
ly sa
mpl
ed q
uarte
rly.
3. W
ells
are
com
plet
ed a
t the
top
of th
e un
confi
ned
aqui
fer.
4. S
ampl
ing
abbr
evia
tions
use
d in
this
tabl
e ar
e as
follo
ws:
A
= to
be
sam
pled
ann
ually
C
= w
ell i
s con
stru
cted
as a
reso
urce
pro
tect
ion
wel
l und
er W
AC
173
‑160
, “M
inim
um S
tand
ard
for C
onst
ruct
ion
and
Mai
nten
ance
of W
ells
”M
=
to b
e sa
mpl
ed m
onth
lyP
= co
nstru
cted
prio
r to
WA
C re
quire
men
tsQ
=
to b
e sa
mpl
ed q
uarte
rlyS
= to
be
sam
pled
sem
iann
ually
B-38 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑40. Monitoring Wells, Constituents, and Enforcement Limits for 200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility
Well Number* W
AC
‑Com
plia
ntConstituents with
Enforcement Limits Other Constituents
Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010pH (6
.5 to
8.5
)
Cad
miu
m (5
µg
/L)
Lea
d (1
0 µg
/L)
Spec
ific
Con
duct
ance
Alp
ha
Ani
ons
Bet
a
Met
als
Tota
l Dis
solv
ed
Solid
s
Trac
e M
etal
s
Triti
um
699‑40‑36 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q A Yes
699‑41‑35 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q A Yes699‑42‑37 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q A YesNotes:
1. Requirements from Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Hanford Site 200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility (PNNL‑13032).
2. All wells completed at the top of the Ringold Formation confined aquifer.
* Bold italic indicates upgradient well.
A = to be sampled annually
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
Q = to be sampled quarterly
Table B‑41. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility
Well Numbera W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt
Alk
alin
ity
Alp
ha
Ani
ons
Bet
a
C‑1
4
I‑‑2
9
Met
als
Rad
ium
b
Tota
l Dis
solv
ed
Solid
s
Tc‑9
9
TOX
Ura
nium
VO
A Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010699‑35‑66A P S S S S S S S S S S S S S Yes699‑36‑66B C S S S S S S S S S S S S S Yes699‑36‑70A C S S S S S S S S S S S S S Yes699‑37‑66 C S S S S S S S S S S S S S YesNotes:
1. Requirements from Groundwater Protection Plan for the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (WCH‑198).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer.
a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.
b. Total alpha energy emitted from radium.
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
P = constructed prior to WAC requirements
S = to be sampled semiannually
TOX = total organic halides
VOA = volatile organic analyte
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-39
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑42. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Solid Waste Landfill
Well Numbera Comment W
AC
‑Com
plia
nt
Contamination Indicator Parameters
Other Parameters
Sampled as Scheduled
in 2010Am
mon
ia
Che
mic
al O
xyge
n D
eman
d
Chl
orid
e
Iron
(Filt
ered
)
Man
gane
se (F
ilter
ed)
Zin
c (F
ilter
ed)
Nitr
ate
Nitr
ite
pH (F
ield
)
Spec
ific
Con
duct
ance
(F
ield
)
Sulfa
te
Tem
pera
ture
(Fie
ld)
Col
iform
Bac
teri
a
TOC
Ani
ons
Met
als (
Filte
red)
Ars
enic
(Filt
ered
)
VO
A
699‑22‑35 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Nob
699‑23‑34A ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes699‑23‑34B ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes
699‑24‑33Information
only; no statistics
P Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes
699‑24‑34A ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes699‑24‑34B ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Nob
699‑24‑34C ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes699‑24‑35 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Nob
699‑26‑35A ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q YesNotes:
1. Requirements from Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Solid Waste Landfill (PNNL‑13014).
2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer.
a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.
b. Well not sampled as scheduled in December 2010 due to large sampling load after work stoppage in October 2010.
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”
P = constructed prior to WAC requirements
Q = to be sampled quarterly
TOC = total organic carbon
VOA = volatile organic analysis
B-40 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Table B‑43. Monitoring Wells, Constituents, and Enforcement Limits for State‑Approved Land Disposal Site
Well Comment
Constituents with Enforcement Limits Other Constituents
Sampled as Scheduled
for CY 2010WA
C C
ompl
iant
pH Ace
tone
Ben
zene
Cad
miu
m *
Chl
orof
orm
Cop
per
*
Lea
d *
Mer
cury
*
Sulfa
te
Tetr
ahyd
rofu
ran
Tota
l Dis
solv
ed
Solid
s
Spec
ific
Con
duct
ance
Alp
ha
Bet
a
Sr‑9
0
Triti
um
299‑W6‑6 Bottom of unconfined C ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ A Yes
299‑W6‑11 ‑‑ C ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ A Yes299‑W6‑12 ‑‑ C ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ A Yes
299‑W7‑3 Bottom of unconfined C ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ S Yes
299‑W8‑1 ‑‑ C ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ A Yes699‑48‑71 Unconfined P ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ A Yes
699‑48‑77A Ringold Formation unit E, upper C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes
699‑48‑77CRingold Formation unit E, middle to lower
C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes
699‑48‑77D Ringold Formation unit E, upper C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes
699‑49‑79 ‑‑ P ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ A Yes699‑51‑75 ‑‑ P ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ S Yes699‑51‑75P Lower unconfined P ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ A YesNotes:
1. Requirements are from Groundwater Monitoring and Tritium Tracking Plan for the 200 Area State‑Approved Land Disposal Site (PNNL‑13121).
2. Wells are completed at the top of the aquifer unless specified otherwise
* Filtered and unfiltered samples.
A = to be sampled annually
C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC‑173‑160
P = constructed prior to WAC requirements
Q = to be sampled quarterly
S = to be sampled semiannually
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-41
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑44. A
nalytical Results fo
r Required Con
stitu
ents at the Solid W
aste Landfi
ll
Con
stitu
enta
Dat
e69
9‑22
‑35
699‑
23‑3
4A69
9‑23
‑34B
699‑
24‑3
369
9‑24
‑34A
699‑
24‑3
4B69
9‑24
‑34C
699‑
24‑3
569
9‑26
‑35A
Am
mon
ium
ion
(µg/
L)
BTV
= 9
0 µg
/Lb
1/19
/10
5.54
<4.3
85.
545.
804.
897.
474.
7716
.7<4
.38
4/20
‑21/
10<4
.38
<4.3
8<4
.38
<4.3
814
.0<4
.38
12.9
23.7
<4.3
87/
19/1
014
.610
.639
.351
.326
.521
.634
.315
.611
.212
/6/1
0SN
C<3
.09
<3.0
912
.6<3
.09
SNC
<3.0
9SN
C<3
.09
Che
mic
al o
xyge
n de
man
d (m
g/L)
BTV
= 1
0 m
g/L
1/19
/10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
4/20
‑21/
10<1
0<1
0<1
0<1
0<1
0<1
0<1
0<1
0<1
07/
19/1
0<1
0<1
0<1
0<1
0<1
0<1
0<1
0<1
0<1
012
/6/1
0SN
C<1
0<1
0<1
0<1
0SN
C<1
0SN
C<1
0
Chl
orid
e (m
g/L)
BTV
= 7
.82
mg/
L
1/19
/10
6.18
6.22
5.86
6.52
6.83
6.40
6.47
5.95
7.10
4/20
‑21/
106.
376.
275.
856.
536.
846.
436.
606.
007.
117/
19/1
07.
287.
146.
627.
167.
427.
17.
196.
447.
4112
/6/1
0SN
CN
AR
NA
R7.
037.
37SN
C7.
12SN
C7.
53
Col
iform
bac
teria
(c
olon
ies/
100m
L)
BTV
=
1 co
l./10
0 m
l
1/19
/10
<1<1
<1<1
3.1
<1<1
<1<1
4/20
‑21/
100
00
00
00
00
7/19
/10
<1<1
<1<1
<1<1
<1<1
<112
/6/1
0SN
CN
AR
NA
RN
AR
NA
RSN
CN
AR
SNC
NA
R
Iron
(filte
red)
(µ
g/L)
BTV
= 1
60 µ
g/L
1/19
/10
<18
38.7
25.9
<18
42.7
77.6
54.2
34.3
20.5
4/20
‑21/
1021
.123
.0<1
8<1
866
.814
943
.919
.6<1
87/
19/1
029
.541
.038
.0<1
836
.073
.020
.0<1
8<1
812
/6/1
0SN
C<3
8<3
8<3
8<3
8SN
C<3
8SN
C<3
8
Man
gane
se
(filte
red)
(µ
g/L)
BTV
= 1
8 µg
/L
1/19
/10
<4.0
<4.0
<4.0
<4.0
<4.0
<4.0
<4.0
<4.0
<4.0
4/20
‑21/
10<4
.0<4
.0<4
.0<4
.0<4
.0<4
.0<4
.0<4
.0<4
.07/
19/1
0<4
.0<4
.0<4
.0<4
.0<4
.0<4
.0<4
.0<4
.0<4
.012
/6/1
0SN
C<4
.0<4
.0<4
.0<4
.0SN
C<4
.0SN
C<4
.0
Nitr
ate
(mg/
L)
BTV
= 2
9 m
g/L
1/19
/10
17.8
19.4
17.4
14.9
13.9
15.2
14.7
12.8
17.9
4/20
‑21/
1018
.220
.117
.815
.114
.416
.115
.213
.218
.17/
19/1
018
.119
.517
.815
.114
.316
.014
.612
.517
.912
/6/1
0SN
CN
AR
NA
R15
.114
.2SN
C14
.4SN
C18
.2
Nitr
ite (µ
g/L)
BTV
= 2
66 µ
g/L
1/19
/10
<118
<118
<118
<118
<118
<118
<118
<118
<118
4/20
/10
to 4
/21/
10<1
18<1
18<1
18<1
18<1
18<1
18<1
18<1
18<1
18
7/19
/10
<118
<118
<118
<118
<118
<118
<118
<118
<118
12/6
/10
SNC
NA
RN
AR
<118
<118
SNC
<118
SNC
<118
B-42 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Tabl
e B
‑44.
(C
ont.)
Con
stitu
enta
Dat
e69
9‑22
‑35
699‑
23‑3
4A69
9‑23
‑34B
699‑
24‑3
369
9‑24
‑34A
699‑
24‑3
4B69
9‑24
‑34C
699‑
24‑3
569
9‑26
‑35A
pH m
easu
rem
ent
BTR
= 6
.68‑
7.84
1/19
/10
6.95
6.65
6.67
6.86
6.7
6.71
6.96
6.87
7.27
4/20
/10
to 4
/21/
106.
916.
636.
646.
866.
816.
857.
606.
837.
267/
19/1
06.
936.
676.
666.
956.
746.
706.
856.
857.
3312
/6/1
0SN
C6.
676.
666.
986.
96SN
C7.
21SN
C7.
29Sp
ecifi
c co
nduc
tanc
e (µ
S/cm
)
BTV
=
583
µS/c
m
1/19
/10
788
741
738
753
668
682
712
573
534
4/20
/10
to 4
/21/
1080
675
875
075
065
267
672
556
553
27/
19/1
081
275
875
773
266
268
972
556
652
2
12/6
/10
SNC
758
747
742
650
SNC
720
SNC
534
Sulfa
te (m
g/L)
BTV
= 4
7.2
mg/
L
1/19
/10
43.3
48.4
45.3
44.3
45.7
46.0
42.5
44.9
40.0
4/20
/10
to 4
/21/
1044
.349
.245
.345
.447
.047
.343
.946
.140
.97/
19/1
043
.948
.844
.844
.546
.346
.743
.644
.740
.512
/6/1
0SN
CN
AR
NA
R44
.346
.8SN
C43
.4SN
C40
.7
Tem
pera
ture
(°C
)
BTV
= 2
0.7°
C
1/19
/10
16.7
18.6
18.0
19.2
17.2
18.5
18.2
17.0
19.0
4/20
/10
to 4
/21/
1019
.418
.117
.919
.618
.118
.518
.417
.819
.77/
19/1
019
.420
.320
.019
.920
.622
.620
.818
.519
.612
/6/1
0SN
C17
.917
.719
.215
.7SN
C16
.5SN
C18
.8
TOC
(µg/
L)
BTV
=
1,20
0 µg
/L
1/19
/10
434
430
461
319
350
300
364
300
300
4/20
/10
to 4
/21/
1078
387
286
476
056
455
954
449
841
77/
19/1
043
548
754
143
533
232
839
830
530
012
/6/1
0SN
C88
61,
000
881
699
SNC
837
SNC
536
Zinc
(filte
red)
(µ
g/L)
BTV
= 4
2.3
µg/L
1/19
/10
<6<6
<67.
5<6
<66.
5<6
7.1
4/20
/10
to 4
/21/
10<6
<6<6
9.2
<6<6
7.6
6.3
<67/
19/1
06.
5<6
<6<6
<6<6
8.0
6.0
<612
/6/1
0SN
C<4
<46.
0<4
SNC
12.0
SNC
5.0
Not
e: R
esul
ts in
bol
d ex
ceed
bac
kgro
und
thre
shol
d va
lues
.a.
WA
C 1
73‑3
04, “
Min
imum
Fun
ctio
nal S
tand
ards
for S
olid
Was
te H
andl
ing.
”b.
201
0 B
ackg
roun
d th
resh
old
valu
es o
btai
ned
from
Tab
le C
‑41
of H
anfo
rd S
ite G
roun
dwat
er M
onito
ring
for C
alen
dar Y
ear 2
009
(DO
E/R
L‑20
10‑1
1).
BTV
=
back
grou
nd th
resh
old
valu
eN
AR
=
no a
naly
sis r
esul
tSN
C
= sa
mpl
e no
t col
lect
edTO
C
= to
tal o
rgan
ic c
arbo
n
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-43
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Table B‑45. Results of Shapiro and Francia Test for Normality and Background Threshold Values for the Solid Waste Landfill
Constituenta (unit)
W‑test Statisticb (Log Value)
W‑test Statisticb (Raw Data)
W‑testb Critical Value, Wαc
Upper Tolerance Limit
Background Threshold
Value
Ammonium (as NH3‑) (µg/L) NC NC NC
90d 19.7e WSCF 27.5e STL
90
Chemical oxygen demand (µg/L) NC NC NC 10,000f 10,000
Chloride (µg/L) 0.954 s 0.962 s 0.963 7,820d 7,820Coliform bacteria (colonies/100 mL) NC NC NC 1f 1
Field pH 0.988 ns NA 0.963 [6.68, 7.84]g [6.68, 7.84]
Iron, dissolved (µg/L) 0.960 s 0.802 s 0.962160d
174e WSCF 129e STL
174
Manganese, dissolved (µg/L) NC NC NC10d
27.5e WSCF 15.1e STL
27.5
Nitrate (as NO3‑) (µg/L) 0.833 s 0.844 s 0.963 29,000d 29,000
Nitrite (as NO2‑) (µg/L) NC NC NC 165e WSCF
14e STL 165
Specific conductance (µS/cm) 0.978 ns NA 0.960 583g 583Sulfate (µg/L) 0.983 ns NA 0.963 47,200g 47,200Temperature (degrees C) 0.953 s 0.961 s 0.963 20.7d 20.7
Total organic carbon (µg/L) NC NC NC 842d 210e 842
Zinc, dissolved (µg/L) NC NC NC42.3d
18.3e WSCF 32.1e STL
42.3
a. Constituents are specified in WAC 173‑304‑490(2)(d). Data collected from March 1993 to May 2000 from upgradient wells 699‑24‑35 and 699‑26‑35A.
b. From “Approximate Analysis of Variance Test for Normality,” in Journal of the American Statistical Association (Shapiro and Francia, 1972).
c. Obtained from Table A‑9 in “How to Test Normality and Other Distributional Assumptions,” in ASQC Basic References in Quality Control: Statistical Techniques (Shapiro, 1980) for α = 5%.
d. Maximum value reported.
e. Based on limit of quantitation determined from field blanks (for total organic carbon) or laboratory blanks.
f. Based on laboratory lowest detected result.
g. Based on log‑normal distribution.
NA = not applicable
NC = not calculated; insufficient measured values
ns = not significant at 0.05 level of significance
s = significant at 0.05 level of significance
STL = Severn Trent Laboratories (St. Louis)
WSCF = Waste Sampling and Characterization Facility
B-44 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Figure B‑1. RCRA Units on the Hanford Site Requiring Groundwater Monitoring
LLWMA 1
WMA B-BX-BY SST
LLWMA 2
LERF 216-B-3 Pond
216-A-29 Ditch
216-A-37-1 Crib
WMA-C SST
WMA-A-AX SST
IDF
200-East Area
216-S-10 Pond and Ditch
LLWMA 3 WMA T SST
WMA TX-TY SST
LLWMA 4WMA U SST
WMA S-SX SST
200-West Area
1325-N LWDF
100-N Area
183-H Solar Evaporation Basins100-H Area
316-5 ProcessTrenches
300 Area
Solid Waste Landfill
NRDWL
1325-N LWDF1301-N LWDF 183-H SolarEvaporation Basins
100-H Area
1324-N/NA Facilities
100-N Area
Not to Scale
IDF Integrated Disposal FacilityLERF Liquid Effluent Retention FacilityLLWMA Low-Level Waste Management AreaLWDF Liquid Disposal FacilityNRDWL Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill
SALDS State-Approved Land Disposal SiteSST Single-Shell TankSWL Solid Waste LandfillWMA Waste Management Area £
216-A-10 Crib
216-A-36B Crib
216-B-36 Trench
gwf10441
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-45
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Figure B‑2. Groundwater Monitoring Wells for 100‑N Area RCRA Sites
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Co
l um
bi a
Ri v
er
120-N-1 Percolation Pond
116-N-1LWDF
116-N-3LWDF
120-N-2Surface Impoundment
N-2
N-3
N-165
N-71
N-57
N-77
N-34
N-81
N-72
N-28
N-41
N-74
N-32
N-105A
N-73
! RCRA Monitoring Well
Well prefix '199-' omitted
Waste Site
Facility
Former Operational Area
Groundwater Operable Unit
£0 500 1,000 ft
0 100 200 300 m
gwf10442
B-46 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Figure B‑3. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 116‑H‑6 Evaporation Basins
H
H
!!
Co l u m
b i a Ri v e r
116-H-6 SolarEvaporation Basins
HR-3Process
HXTransfer
HXProcess
H4-8
H4-3H4-12A
H4-12C
! RCRA Monitoring Well
H RCRA Monitoring Well and Extraction Well
Pump and Treat Building
Waste Site
Former Operational Area£0 150 300 450 m
0 500 1,000 1,500 ft gwf10443
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-47
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Figure B‑4. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑A‑29 Ditch, PUREX Cribs, and Waste Management Areas A‑AX and C
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
E17-19
216-A-45Crib
216-A-10Crib
216-A-38-1Crib
216-A-36BCrib 216-A-30
Crib
216-A-37-2Crib
216-A-8 Crib
216-A-24 Ditch216-A-29 Ditch
WMA A-AX
WMA C
216-A-37-1Crib
216-B-3Pond
E27-155E27-24
E27-25
699-43-45
E25-28
E25-26E25-35
E25-34
E26-13
E26-12
E25-48
E25-32PE25-2E25-94
E24-33
E24-20
E25-40
E25-41E24-22
E25-93E25-236
E17-1
E24-18
E17-16
E17-14
E25-17
699-37-47A
E25-19
E17-18
E25-31
E24-16
E27-7
E27-4
E27-12
E27-22
E27-14E27-23
E27-21
E27-13
E27-15
gwf10444
! A-29 Monitoring Well! A-AX Monitoring Well! PUREX Cribs Monitoring Well ! WMA C Monitoring Well!( Other Monitoring Well Decommissioned Well
Waste SiteFacilityFormer Operational Area
Well prefix '299-' omitted0 0.25 0.5 km
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 mi £
B-48 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Figure B‑5. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑B‑3 Pond and 200 Areas Treated Effluent Disposal Facility
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!
!
!
!
!
216-A-29Ditch
216-B-3-3 Ditch 216-B-3Pond 216-B-3A
Pond216-B-3B
Pond
200 AreasTEDF
42-42B
43-44
43-45
44-39B
299-E26-11
39-39
41-42
41-40
42-40A
42-40C
42-39A42-39B
41-35
40-36
42-37
216-B-3CPond
216-A-30 Crib216-A-37-2 Crib
gwf10445
! B Pond Monitoring Well!( TEDF Monitoring Well!( Other Monitoring Well
Well prefix '699-' omitted
Waste SiteFormer Operational AreaBasalt Above Water Table £
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 mi
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 km
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-49
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Figure B‑6. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch
`
!
!
!
!
!
216-S-16 Ditch
216-S-11 Pond
216-S-10 Pond
216-S-10
Ditch
216-S
-5
216-S-6
W27-2
32-76
33-75
33-76
W26-14
W26-13
200 West Area
gwf10446
! RCRA Monitoring Well
` Deep RCRA Monitoring Well
Well prefix '299-' or '699-' omitted
Waste Site
Former Operational Area
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 ft
0 100 200 300 m £
B-50 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Figure B‑7. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 316‑5 Process Trenches
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
Co
l um
bi a
Ri v
er
618-4 Burial Ground
618-5 Burial Ground
316-2NorthProcessPond
316-1SouthProcessPond
618-1BurialGround
618-2BurialGround
316-5 ProcessTrenches
316-3 Trench
1-18A1-18B
1-17B
1-10B
1-16B
1-10A
1-16A1-17A
! RCRA Monitoring Well
Well prefix '399-' omitted
Waste Site
Facility
Former Operational Area
£
gwf104470 200 400 600 ft
0 100 200 m
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-51
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Figure B‑8. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Integrated Disposal Facility
!
!
!
!
!
!
IntegratedDisposalFacility
200 East
E18-1
E17-25
E24-21
E17-23
E24-24
E17-26
! RCRA Monitoring WellWell prefix '299-' omitted
Former Operational AreaWaste SiteFacility £
gwf10448
0 75 150 225 m
0 250 500 750 ft
B-52 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Figure B‑9. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Liquid Effluent Retention Facility
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!
!
!
!
LERF
216-B-3-3 Ditch
216-A-29Ditch
E26-77
E26-79
699-43-45
E27-7
E27-14
E26-12
E26-10
E26-13
E27-22
E26-11
! RCRA Monitoring Well
!( Other Monitoring Well
Well prefix '299-' omitted
Waste Site
Former Operational Area
Basalt Above Water Table
£0 500 1,000 ft
0 100 200 300 m
gwf10449
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-53
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Figure B‑10. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Low‑Level Waste Management Area 1
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
LLWMA 1
E32-6
E32-5
E32-2
E32-7
E32-4
E32-9
E32-3
E32-8
E28-26
E28-27
E33-28
E28-28
E33-30
E33-21
E33-265
E33-29
E32-10
E33-35
E33-34
E33-266
£0 250 500 750 ft
0 75 150 225 m
gwf10450
! RCRA Monitoring Well
Well prefix '299-' omitted
Waste Site
Former Operational Area
B-54 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Figure B‑11. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑B‑63 Trench and Low‑Level Waste Management Area 2
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!(
(
(
(
(
LLWMA 2
E34-9
E34-2
E27-10
E34-12
E27-9
E34-8
E27-8
E34-10
E33-37
E27-19
E33-36
E33-33
E27-18
E27-16
E27-17
E27-11
£ 0 500 1,000 ft
0 100 200 300 m
gwf10451
( LLWMA 2 and B-63 Monitoring Wells
! LLWMA 2 Monitoring Well
! B-63 Monitoring Well
!( Other Monitoring Well
Decommissioned Well
Well prefix '299-' omitted
Waste Site
Facility
Former Operational Area
Basalt Above Water Table
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-55
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Figure B‑12. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Low‑Level Waste Management Area 3
!
!
!
!
LLWMA 3
LLWMA 5
WMA T
216-T-32 Crib
216-T-7 Crib
WMA TX-TY
216-T-36 Crib
SALDS(616-A Crib)
W7-4
W10-29
W10-31
W10-30
! RCRA Monitoring Well
Well prefix '299-' omitted
Waste Site
Former Operational Area
£0 500 1,000 ft
0 100 200 300 m
gwf10452
B-56 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Figure B‑13. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Low‑Level Waste Management Area 4
\
\
\!
!
!
!
!
!
!
LLWMA-4
W15-30
W15-94
W15-15
W18-23
W18-22
W15-83
W15-17
W18-21
W15-224
W15-152
! RCRA Monitoring Well
\ Dry Well
Well prefix '299-' omitted
Waste Site
Former Operational Area
£
0 500 1,000 ft
0 100 200 300 m
gwf10453
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-57
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Figure B‑14. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill and Solid Waste Landfill
`
`
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
NRDWL
Solid WasteLandfill
25-33A
26-33
26-34A
25-34B
26-35C26-34B26-35A
25-34A
25-34D
24-33
24-34C
22-35
24-35
24-34B
23-34A
23-34B
24-34A
! Monitoring Well Completed atTop of Unconfined
` Monitoring Well Completedin Upper Ringold Unit
Well prefix '699-' omitted
Waste Site
£0 500 1,000 ft
0 100 200 300 m
gwf10454
B-58 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Figure B‑15. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Waste Management Area B‑BX‑BY
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!
!
!!
!
!
BY Cribs
B-8 Crib and Tile Field
WMA BY
WMA BX WMA B
B-7 A & B CribsE33-18,344,345
E33-9
E33-7
E28-8
E33-17E33-44
E33-43
E33-49
E33-39
E33-16
E33-21
E33-31
E33-48
E33-47
E33-32
E33-38
E33-26
E33-42
E33-41
E33-15
E33-20
E33-334
E33-337
E33-338E33-335 E33-339
E33-40
E33-341
E33-5
E33-342
E33-1A
E33-2
E33-3
E33-4
E33-340
E33-12
E33-50E33-13
E33-14
E33-33
E33-36
E33-37
E33-343
gwf10455
! RCRA Monitoring Well
!( Other Well Sampled CY 2006 - 2010
Well prefix '299-' omitted
Waste Site
Former Operational Area
Basalt Above Water Table£
0 60 120 180 m
0 200 400 600 ft
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-59
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Figure B‑16. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Waste Management Areas S‑SX and U
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
LLWMA 4
U Pond
WMA U
WMA SY
WMA S-SX
216-S-25 Crib
216-S-7 Crib
216-S-13 Crib
216-S-9 Crib
216-S-23 Crib
216-U-1,2Cribs
W19-44
W18-30
W22-47
W19-41
W18-31
W22-82
W22-48
W19-47
W22-44
W22-49
W18-40
W22-45
W23-19
W23-15W22-83
W23-21
W22-80
W22-84
W22-85
W22-72
W22-69
W19-45
W22-86
W19-12
W23-20
W22-81
W22-50
W19-42
! RCRA Monitoring Well
Well prefix '299-' omitted
Waste Site
Facility
Former Operational Area
£
0 500 1,000 ft
0 100 200 300 m
gwf10456
B-60 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Figure B‑17. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Waste Management Areas T and TX‑TY
H
H
H
H
H
H
H H
H
H
H
H
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
WMA T
WMA TY
WMA TX
W10-32
W15-34
W15-44
W10-8
W10-1
W10-4
W14-6
W14-18
W11-40
W10-26
W10-27
W14-14
W11-41 W11-7
W14-19
W14-15
W11-39
W14-16
W14-17
W10-22
W14-11
W15-41
W10-23
W11-47
W11-12
W10-28
W14-13
W11-42
W15-763
W10-24
W15-7W15-1
W15-35
W15-40W15-43
W15-45
W11-46
W15-11
W11-45
W15-765
W15-225
! RCRA Monitoring Well
H Extraction Well
Decommissioned Well
Well prefix '299-' omitted
Waste Site
Facility
£0 500 1,000 ft
0 100 200 300 m
gwf10457
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-61
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Figure B‑18. Non‑RCRA Regulated Units on the Hanford Site Requiring Groundwater Monitoring
TEDF
SolidWasteLandfill
ERDF
100-KArea
KW Basin
KE Basin
200-WestArea
200-EastArea
SALDS
(See Figure gwf10445 for well locations)
Hanford Site Boundary
gwf10458
Former Operational Area
Basalt Above Water Table
0 2 4 6 8 mi
0 4 8 12 km
£ERDF -Environmental Restoration Disposal FacilitySALDS -State-Approved Land Disposal SiteTEDF -Treated Effluent Disposal Facility
Columbia River
B-62 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Figure B‑19. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 100‑K Basins
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
C o l um b i a
R i ve r
100-K
Crib
(116-K
-1)
100-K
Tren
ch
(116-K
-2)
100-K Burial
Ground
(118-K-1)
KE Condensate
Crib (116-KE-1)
KW Condensate
Crib (116-KW-1)
KWDrain Field
(116-KW-1)
KE
Drain Field
(116-KE-3)
K-179
K-178
K-144
107-KW
Retention Basins
107-KE
Retention Basins
K-191
K-187
K-190
K-198K-199
K-200
K-183
K-35
K-138
K-140
K-137K-166
K-132
K-156
K-168
K-165
K-127
K-145
K-141
K-174
K-125A
K-124A
K-120A
K-119A
K-123A
K-139
K-27
K-36
K-31
K-30
K-23
K-20
K-19K-18
K-32B K-32A
K-181
K-173
K-157
K-142
K-175
K-162
K-158
K-125A
K-109A
K-111A
K-110A
K-107AK-106AK-34
K-29
K-11
K-108A
K-123A
! Monitoring Well CY 2006 - 2010
Decommissioned Well
H Extraction Well
H
Injection Well
E Aquifer Tube
Well prefix '199-' omitted
Waste Site
Facility
Former Operational Area
£ 0 500 1,000 ft
0 100 200 300 m
gwf10459
Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-63
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B
Figure B‑20. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at State‑Approved Land Disposal Site
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
`
`
`
`
!
!!! !
!
!
48-77B
W6-6W7-3W8-1
50-74
49-79
48-71
W6-12 W6-11
51-7551-75P
48-77A
48-77D48-77C
! Tritium Tracking Well(Sampled for Tritium Only)
` SALDS Network Monitoring Well!( Other Monitoring Well
Well prefix '299-' or '699-' omitted
Decommissioned WellWaste Site
Former Operational Area
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 ft
0 200 400 600 m£
gwf10460
SALDS
LLWMA 3 LLWMA 5
B-64 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010
DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B
Figure B‑21. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!
!
!
!
ERDF
38-70
35-70
38-65
36-70B
38-70B 38-70C
38-68A
37-66
36-66B
36-70A
35-66A
36-67
37-68
gwf10461
£! ERDF Network Monitoring Well!( Other Monitoring Well Decommissioned Well
Well prefix '699-' omittedWaste SiteFormer Operational Area
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 mi
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 km