appendix b supporting information for monitored facilities · 2012-07-02 · supporting information...

Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-i

DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0Appendix B

Appendix B

Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities

B-ii Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010

DOE/RL-2011-01, Rev. 0 Appendix B

This page intentionally left blank.

Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-iii


ContentsAppendix B — Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities .......................................................................................... B‑1References............................... ............................................................................................................................................. B‑1

TablesTable B‑1. Estimates of Groundwater Flow Rates at Hanford Site RCRA Facilities .......................................................... B‑7Table B‑2. Upgradient/Downgradient Comparison Values Used for Statistical Comparisons at RCRA Sites, CY 2010 .... B‑9Table B‑3. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 100‑N Area Units ............................................................................ B‑10Table B‑4. Critical Means for 1301‑N (116‑N‑1) Liquid Waste Disposal Facility for CY 2011 Comparisons ................ B‑11Table B‑5. Critical Means for 1324‑NA (120‑N‑1) Percolation Pond and 1324‑N (120‑N‑2)

Surface Impoundment for CY 2011 Comparisons ........................................................................................ B‑11Table B‑6. Critical Means for 1325‑N (116‑N‑3) Liquid Waste Disposal Facility for CY 2011 Comparisons ................ B‑12Table B‑7. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 116‑H‑6 Evaporation Basins ........................................................... B‑12Table B‑8. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑A‑29 Ditch............................................................................... B‑13Table B‑9. Critical Means for 216‑A‑29 Ditch for CY 2011 Comparisons ..................................................................... B‑13Table B‑10. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑B‑3 Pond.................................................................................. B‑14Table B‑11. Critical Means for 216‑B‑3 Pond for CY 2011 Comparisons ........................................................................ B‑14Table B‑12. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑B‑63 Trench ............................................................................. B‑15Table B‑13. Critical Means for 216‑B‑63 Trench for CY 2011 Comparisons ................................................................... B‑16Table B‑14. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch ............................................................... B‑16Table B‑15. Critical Means for 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch for CY 2011 Comparisons ..................................................... B‑17Table B‑16. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 316‑5 Process Trenches .................................................................... B‑17Table B‑17. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for the Integrated Disposal Facility ....................................................... B‑18Table B‑18. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Liquid Effluent Retention Facility ................................................... B‑18Table B‑19. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 1 ............................................. B‑19Table B‑20. Critical Means for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 1 for CY 2011 Comparisons ................................... B‑20Table B‑21. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 2 ............................................. B‑21Table B‑22. Critical Means for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 2 for CY 2011 Comparisons ................................... B‑22Table B‑23. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 3 ............................................. B‑22Table B‑24. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 4 ............................................ B‑23Table B‑25. Critical Means for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 4 for CY 2011 Comparisons ................................... B‑24Table B‑26. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for the Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill ................................. B‑25Table B‑27. Critical Means for Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill for CY 2011 Comparisons ............................. B‑26Table B‑28. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for RCRA PUREX Cribs 216‑A‑10, 216‑A‑36B, and 216‑A‑37‑1 ........ B‑26Table B‑29. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area A‑AX ....................................................... B‑27Table B‑30. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area B‑BX‑BY ................................................. B‑28Table B‑31. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area C ............................................................. B‑29Table B‑32. Groundwater Assessment Volatile Organic Compound Monitoring at Waste Management Area C............... B‑30Table B‑33. Groundwater Assessment Semivolatile Organic Compound Monitoring at Waste Management Area C ....... B‑31Table B‑34. Groundwater Assessment Inorganic Constituent Monitoring at Waste Management Area C ........................ B‑32Table B‑35. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area S‑SX ........................................................ B‑33Table B‑36. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area T .............................................................. B‑34Table B‑37. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area TX‑TY ..................................................... B‑35Table B‑38. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area U ............................................................. B‑36Table B‑39. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for the KE and KW Basins .................................................................... B‑37Table B‑40. Monitoring Wells, Constituents, and Enforcement Limits for 200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility ... B‑38Table B‑41. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility ................................... B‑38Table B‑42. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Solid Waste Landfill ........................................................................ B‑39Table B‑43. Monitoring Wells, Constituents, and Enforcement Limits for State‑Approved Land Disposal Site ................ B‑40Table B‑44. Analytical Results for Required Constituents at the Solid Waste Landfill ...................................................... B‑41Table B‑45. Results of Shapiro and Francia Test for Normality and Background Threshold Values for the

Solid Waste Landfill ...................................................................................................................................... B‑43

B-iv Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010


FiguresFigure B‑1. RCRA Units on the Hanford Site Requiring Groundwater Monitoring ........................................................ B‑44Figure B‑2. Groundwater Monitoring Wells for 100‑N Area RCRA Sites ........................................................................ B‑45Figure B‑3. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 116‑H‑6 Evaporation Basins ................................................................... B‑46Figure B‑4. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑A‑29 Ditch, PUREX Cribs, and

Waste Management Areas A‑AX and C ......................................................................................................... B‑47Figure B‑5. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑B‑3 Pond and 200 Areas Treated Effluent Disposal Facility .............. B‑48Figure B‑6. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch ....................................................................... B‑49Figure B‑7. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 316‑5 Process Trenches ........................................................................... B‑50Figure B‑8. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Integrated Disposal Facility ..................................................................... B‑51Figure B‑9. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Liquid Effluent Retention Facility ........................................................... B‑52Figure B‑10. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Low‑Level Waste Management Area 1 .................................................... B‑53Figure B‑11. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑B‑63 Trench and Low‑Level Waste Management Area 2 .................. B‑54Figure B‑12. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Low‑Level Waste Management Area 3 .................................................... B‑55Figure B‑13. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Low‑Level Waste Management Area 4 .................................................... B‑56Figure B‑14. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill and Solid Waste Landfill ....... B‑57Figure B‑15. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Waste Management Area B‑BX‑BY ......................................................... B‑58Figure B‑16. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Waste Management Areas S‑SX and U .................................................... B‑59Figure B‑17. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Waste Management Areas T and TX‑TY ................................................. B‑60Figure B‑18. Non‑RCRA Regulated Units on the Hanford Site Requiring Groundwater Monitoring ............................... B‑61Figure B‑19. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 100‑K Basins .......................................................................................... B‑62Figure B‑20. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at State‑Approved Land Disposal Site ......................................................... B‑63Figure B‑21. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility ..................................... B‑64

Supporting Information for Monitored Facilities B-1


Appendix B — Supporting Information for Monitored FacilitiesC.J. Martin

This appendix provides supplemental information for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) and other regulated units on the Hanford Site that require groundwater monitoring, excluding Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 units (which are discussed in Appendix A). Site‑specific discussions for each facility included in this appendix are included in the main text of this document under the respective operable unit in which the facility is located.

Groundwater monitoring under RCRA continued during the reporting period (January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010) at 24 waste management areas (Figure B‑1). Estimates of groundwater velocity, hydrologic properties, and associated references are shown in Table B‑1 for the RCRA sites. To determine if a waste site has adversely affected groundwater quality under RCRA interim status regulations (WAC 173‑303‑400, “Dangerous Waste Regulations,” “Interim Status Facility Standards,” and by reference, 40 CFR 265.93, “Interim Status Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities,” “Preparation, Evaluation, and Response”), concentrations of indicator parameters in downgradient wells are compared to statistically derived critical mean values. The indicator parameters under interim status are specific conductance, pH, total organic carbon, and total organic halides. The critical values to which the indicator parameters are compared represent 99% prediction limits, which are calculated for each facility based on samples from upgradient wells. The upper prediction limits (and lower limit in the case of pH) also are known as critical mean values.

Critical mean values are recalculated annually or if the number of analyses changes. Annual recalculation accounts for changing background conditions. Changes in the number of analyses are usually the result of changes in monitoring well networks (e.g., wells are added or deleted). If changes occur in a monitoring well network, critical mean values for that facility are recalculated for subsequent semiannual sampling events using the new well network.

To reliably indicate potential groundwater effects from a facility, the sample results must be reasonably precise or quantifiable. Specific conductance and pH are field‑measured indicator parameters that are reasonably detectable and quantifiable. The parameters of total organic carbon and total organic halides, however, are much more variable and are often below detection levels. Significant imprecision and variability occur when measuring these parameters near detection limits. The variability in laboratory measurements of field blanks are used to estimate laboratory limits of quantitation during the sampling period. The limit of quantitation is defined as ten times the standard deviation of the field blank analyses (see discussion in Appendix D). For detection monitoring, the statistical comparison values for total organic carbon and total organic halides are the larger of either the critical mean or the limit of quantitation.

Table B‑2 lists the comparison values (critical mean values and limits of quantitation) used during the reporting period. Additional tables list updated critical mean values for use in calendar year 2011 for each RCRA unit where these statistics apply. Tables B‑3 through B‑43 provide supporting information for the RCRA sites, and Figures B‑2 through B‑17 show the locations of monitoring wells at RCRA regulated units.

This appendix also provides constituent lists, well network configurations, and other ancillary information for regulated facilities that fall outside of the RCRA program. Some network wells in these facilities are shared with RCRA facilities, and Figure B‑18 shows the general locations of these facilities. Locations of monitoring wells for these facilities are shown in Figures B‑14, B‑15, B‑19, B‑20, B‑21, B‑22, B‑23, B‑24, and B‑25. Tables B‑39 through B‑44 list the constituents and/or the results summaries for these facilities.

References40 CFR 265, “Interim Status Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities,” Code of Federal Regulations.

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 42 U.S.C. 2011, et seq.

B-2 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010


BNWL‑1709, 1973, Collection and Analysis of Pump Test Data for Transmissivity Values, K. L. Kipp and R. D. Mudd, Battelle Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington.

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. 9601, et seq.

DOE O 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

DOE/RL‑2000‑72, 2006, Performance Assessment Monitoring Plan for the Hanford Site Low‑Level Burial Grounds, Rev. 1, U. S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations, Richland, Washington.

DOE/RL‑2003‑12, 2003, Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application, Integrated Disposal Facility, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

DOE/RL‑2008‑58, 2010, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑A‑29 Ditch, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

DOE/RL‑2008‑59, 2010, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Hanford Site 216‑B‑3 Pond, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

DOE/RL‑2008‑60, 2010, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑B‑63 Trench, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

DOE/RL‑2008‑61, 2010, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

DOE/RL‑2008‑66, 2009, Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring for Fiscal Year 2008, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

DOE/RL‑2009‑38, 2009, Description of Modeling Analyses in Support of the 200‑ZP‑1 Remedial DesignlRemedial Action Work Plan, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

DOE/RL‑2009‑68, 2011, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the LLBG WMA‑3, Rev. 1, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

DOE/RL‑2009‑69, 2010, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the LLBG WMA‑4, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

DOE/RL‑2009‑73, 2011, Interim Status Groundwater Quality Assessment Plan for the Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area S‑SX, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

DOE/RL‑2009‑75, 2009, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for LLBG WMA 1, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

DOE/RL‑2009‑76, 2010, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for LLBG WMA 2, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

DOE/RL‑2009‑77, 2010, Interim Status Groundwater Quality Assessment Plan for the Single Shell Tank Waste Management Area – C, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

DOE/RL‑2010‑11, 2010, Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring and Performance Report for 2009 Volumes 1 And 2, Rev. 1, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

Ecology, 2009, Chemical Test Methods for Designating Dangerous Waste, Appendix 5, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington.

PNL‑6716, 1988, Interim Characterization Report for the 300 Area Process Trenches, R. Schalla, R. W. Wallace, R. L. Aaberg, S. P. Airhart, and D. J. Bates, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.



PNL‑6728, 1988, Geohydrologic Characterization of the Area Surrounding the 183‑H Solar Evaporation Basins, T. L. Liikala, R. L. Aaberg, N. J. Aimo, D. J. Bates, T. J. Gilmore, E. J. Jensen, G. V. Last, P. L. Oberlander, K. B. Olsen, K. R. Oster, L. R. Roome, J. C. Simpson, S. S. Teel, and E. J. Westergard, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNL‑6820, 1989, Hydrogeology of the 200 Areas Low‑Level Burial Grounds — An Interim Report, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNL‑8335, 1992, Applications of Three Aquifer Test Methods for Estimating Hydraulic Properties Within the 100‑N Area, T. J. Gilmore, F. A. Spane, D. R. Newcomer, and C. R. Sherwood, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNL‑8337, 1992, Summary and Evaluation of Available Hydraulic Property Data for the Hanford Site Unconfined Aquifer System, P. D. Thorne and D. R. Newcomer, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNL‑10195, 1994, Three‑Dimensional Conceptual Model for the Hanford Site Unconfined Aquifer System: FY 1994 Status Report, P. D. Thorne, M. A. Chamness, V. R. Vermeul, Q. C. MacDonald, and S. E. Schubert, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑11523, 1997, Combination RCRA Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑A‑10, 216‑A‑36B, and 216‑A‑37‑1 PUREX Cribs, J. W. Lindberg, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑11573, 1997, Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 183‑H Solar Evaporation Basins, M. J. Hartman, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑11957, 1998, Immobilized Low‑Activity Waste Site Borehole 299‑E17‑21, S. P. Reidel, K. D. Reynolds, and D. G. Horton, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑12114‑ICN‑3, 2006, RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area S‑SX at the Hanford Site, Interim Change Notice 3, V. G. Johnson and C. J. Chou, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑12114‑ICN‑4, 2006, RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area S‑SX at the Hanford Site, Interim Change Notice 4, V. G. Johnson and C. J. Chou, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑12227, 1999,Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill, J. W. Lindberg and M. J. Hartman, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑12227‑ICN‑1, 2001, Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill, Interim Change Notice 1, Rev. 1, J. W. Lindberg and M. J. Hartman, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑13014, 2000, Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Solid Waste Landfill, J. W. Lindbert and C. J. Chou, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑13022‑ICN‑3, 2006, Groundwater Quality Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Waste Management Area B‑BX‑BY at the Hanford Site, Interim Change Notice 3, S. M. Narbutovskih, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑13024‑ICN‑4, 2004, RCRA Groundwater Monitoring Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area C at the Hanford Site, Interim Change Notice 4, S. M. Narbutovskih, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.



PNNL‑13024‑ICN‑5, 2007, RCRA Groundwater Monitoring Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area C at the Hanford Site, Interim Change Notice 5, S. M. Narbutovskih, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑13032, 2000, Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Hanford Site 200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility, D. B. Barnett, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑13121, 2000, Groundwater Monitoring and Tritium Tracking Plan for the 200 Area State‑Approved Land Disposal Site, D. B. Barnett, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑13378, 2001, Results of Detailed Hydrologic Characterization Tests – FY 1999, F. A. Spane, P. D. Thorne, and D. R. Newcomer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.


PNNL‑13612‑ICN‑2, 2006, Groundwater Quality Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area U, Interim Change Notice 2, R. M. Smith, F. N. Hodges, and B. A. Williams, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑13914, 2002, Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 1301‑N, 1324‑N/NA, and 1325‑N RCRA Facilities, M. J. Hartman, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑14033, 2002, Groundwater Monitoring and Assessment Plan for the 100‑K Area Fuel Storage Basins, R. E. Peterson, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.


PNNL‑14656, 2004, Borehole Data Package for Four CY 2003 RCRA Wells 299‑E27‑4, 299‑E27‑21, 299‑E27‑22, and 299‑E27‑23 at Single‑Shell Tank, Waste Management Area C, Hanford Site, Washington, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑14753, 2006, Groundwater Data Package for Hanford Assessments, Rev. 1, P. D. Thorne, M. P. Bergeron, M. D. Williams, and V. L. Freedman, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑14804, 2004, Results of Detailed Hydrologic Characterization Tests – Fiscal Year 2003, F. A. Spane and D. R. Newcomer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑15301, 2006, RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area T, D. G. Horton, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑15315, 2006, RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area A‑AX at the Hanford Site, S. M. Narbutovskih and C. J. Chou, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑16005, 2007, RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area TX‑TY, D. G. Horton, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑17732, 2008, Analysis of the Hydrologic Response Associated With Shutdown and Restart of the 200‑ZP‑1 WMA T Tank Farm Pump‑and‑Treat System, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

PNNL‑18279, 2009, Aquifer Testing Recommendations for Well 299‑W15‑225: Supporting Phase I of the 200‑ZP‑1 Groundwater Operable Unit Remedial Design, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. 6901, et seq.



RPP‑21895, 2006, 241‑C‑103 and 241‑C‑109 Tanks Waste Retrieval Work Plan, Rev. 3, J. S. Schofield, CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., Richland, Washington.

RPP‑PLAN‑26534, Integrated Disposal facility Operational Monitoring Plan to Meet DOE Order 435.1, Rev. 0, CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., Richland, Washington.

Shapiro, S. S, 1980, “How to Test Normality and Other Distributional Assumptions,” in ASQC Basic References in Quality Control: Statistical Techniques, Vol. 3, E. J. Dudewicz (ed.), American Society of Quality Control, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Shapiro, S. S., and R. S. Francia, 1972, “Approximate Analysis of Variance Test for Normality,” in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67:215‑216.

WA7890008967, 2006, Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit, Dangerous Waste Portion, Revision 8C, for the Treatment, Storage, and Disposal of Dangerous Waste, as amended, Washington State Department of Ecology, Richland, Washington.

WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells,” Washington Administrative Code.

WAC 173‑303‑400, “Dangerous Waste Regulations,” “Interim Status Facility Standards,” Washington Administrative Code.

WAC 173 303 645, “Dangerous Waste Regulations,” “Releases from Regulated Units,” Washington Administrative Code.

WAC 173‑350, “Solid Waste Handling Standards,” Washington Administrative Code, Olympia, Washington.

WAC 173‑304‑500, “Minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling,” Washington Administrative Code, Olympia, Washington.

WCH‑198, 2008, Groundwater Protection Plan for the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility, Rev. 0, R. L. Weiss, Washington Closure Hanford, Richland, Washington.

WHC‑EP‑0021, 1987, Interim Hydrogeologic Characterization Report and Groundwater Monitoring System for the Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill, Hanford Site, Rev. 0, D. C. Weekes, S. P. Luttrell, and M. R. Fuchs, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

WHC‑MR‑0207, 1990, Borehole Completion Data Package for the 216‑B‑63 Trench – 1990, Rev. 0, S. M. Goodwin, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

WHC‑SD‑EN‑AP‑024, 1991, Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 200 East Area Liquid Effluent Retention Facility, Rev. 1, J. S. Schmid, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

WHC‑SD‑EN‑AP‑185, 1995, Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 300 Area Process Trenches, Rev. 0, J. W. Lindberg, C. J. Chou, and V. G. Johnson, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

WHC‑SD‑EN‑DP‑047, 1992, Borehole Completion Data Package for 216‑A‑29 RCRA Facility Monitoring Wells 299‑E25‑42, 299‑E25‑43, 299‑E26‑12, and 299‑E26‑13, Rev. 0, G. L. Kasza, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

WHC‑SD‑EN‑DP‑052, 1993, Borehole Completion Data Package for the 216‑S‑10 Facility, CY‑1992, Rev. 0, B. A. Williams and D. B. Barnett, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

WHC‑SD‑EN‑EV‑002, 1990, Interim Hydrogeologic Characterization Report for the 216‑B‑3 Pond, Rev. 0, M. J. Hartman, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.



WHC‑SD‑EN‑TI‑019, 1992, Hydrogeologic Model for the 200‑East Groundwater Aggregate Area, Rev. 0, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Borghese, C. D. Delaney, B. H. Ford, J. W. Lindberg, and S. J. Trent, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.



Tabl

e B

‑1.

Estim

ates

of G

roun

dwat

er F

low

Rat

es a

t Han

ford

Site

RC

RA

Faci

litie

s

Site

Flow

D

irec

tion

Flow

Rat

e (m

/day

)M

etho

d

Hyd

raul

ic

Con

duct

ivity

(m

/day

) (So

urce

)E

ffec

tive

Poro

sity

aG

radi

entb

Com

men

ts

116‑

N‑1

LW

DF

Nor

thw

est

0.05

to 0

. 90

Dar

cy6.

1 to

37

(PN

L‑83

35)

‑‑0.

0024

Gra

dien

t cal

cula

ted

betw

een

wel

ls 1

99‑N

‑34

and

199‑

N‑2

.12

0‑N

‑1 a

nd

120‑

N‑2

Nor

thw

est

0.07

to 1

.3D

arcy

6.1

to 3

7 (P

NL‑

8335

)‑‑

0.00

34G

radi

ent c

alcu

late

d be

twee

n w

ells

199

‑N‑7

2 an

d 19

9‑N

‑26.

116‑

N‑3

LW

DF

Nor

th0.

02 to

0.3

7D

arcy

6.1

to 3

7 (P

NL‑

8335

)‑‑

0.00

10G

radi

ent c

alcu

late

d be

twee

n w

ells

199

‑N‑2

8 an

d 19

9‑N

‑81.

116‑

H‑6

Eva

pora

tion

Bas

ins

East

0.32

to 8

.9D

arcy

15 to

140

(P

NL‑

6728

)‑‑

0.00

64G

radi

ent c

alcu

late

d be

twee

n w

ells

199

‑H4‑

9 an

d 19

9‑H

4‑12

B.

216‑

A‑2

9 D

itch

Sout

heas

tcIn

dete

rmin

ate

Dar

cy18

(W

HC

‑SD

‑EN

‑DP‑

047)

0.25

Inde

term

inat

eU

ncer

tain

ty w

ith g

radi

ent a

nd ra

te o

f flow

(see

Se

ctio

n 10

.3.4

).

216‑

B‑3

Pon

dW

est

0.00

48D

arcy

1.0

(WH

C‑S

D‑E

N‑E

V‑00

2;

PNL‑

1019

5)0.

250.

0014

Aver

age

grad

ient

cal

cula

ted

usin

g w

ell

299‑

E25‑

32P

as d

owng

radi

ent w

ell a

nd

wel

ls 6

99‑4

4‑39

B, 6

99‑4

1‑40

, 699

‑41‑

42,

699‑

42‑4

2B, 6

99‑4

3‑44

, and

699

‑43‑

45.

216‑

B‑6

3 Tr

ench

Inde

term

inat

eIn

dete

rmin

ate

Dar

cy18

2 (W

HC

‑MR

‑020

7)0.

2In

dete

rmin

ate

Unc

erta

inty

with

gra

dien

t and

rate

of fl

ow

(see

Sec

tion

9.3.

6).

216‑

S‑10

Pon

d an

d D

itch

Sout

heas

t0.

15D

arcy

10.4

(W

HC

‑SD

‑EN

‑DP‑

052)

0.1

to 0

.20.

0022

Aver

age

grad

ient

cal

cula

ted

usin

g w

ells

29

9‑W

26‑1

3, 2

99‑W

26‑1

4, 6

99‑3

2‑76

, 69

9‑32

‑77,

699

‑33‑

75, a

nd 6

99‑3

3‑76

.31

6‑5

Proc

ess T

renc

hes

Sout

h‑

sout

heas

t0.

20 to

20

Dar

cy15

0 to

15,

000

(PN

L‑67

16)

0.25

0.00

033

Gra

dien

t cal

cula

ted

betw

een

wel

ls 3

99‑1

‑18A

an

d 39

9‑1‑

17A

.

IDF

East

0.00

2 to

0.0

08D

arcy

68 to

75

(PN

NL‑

1365

2;

PNN

L‑11

957)

‑‑0.

0000

2Fl

ow d

irect

ion

and

grad

ient

det

erm

ined

from

tre

nd su

rfac

e an

alys

is (s

ee S

ectio

n 10

.3.1

).

LER

FSo

uthw

est

0.01

84D

arcy

39.8

(P

NN

L‑14

804)

0.37

30.

0002

Gra

dien

t cal

cula

ted

from

PN

NL‑

1480

4.

LLW

MA

‑1N

orth

‑ no

rthw

est

0.18

75 to

0.8

Dar

cy &

Tre

nd

Mat

chin

g2,

500

to 7

,500

(P

NN

L‑14

753)

0.2

0.00

0015

–

0.00

0021

Gra

dien

t cal

cula

ted

from

two

area

s:

(1) b

etw

een

wel

ls 2

99‑E

33‑2

6 an

d 29

9‑E3

3‑38

an

d (2

) fro

m th

e re

gion

al lo

w g

radi

ent w

ater

le

vels

for L

LWM

A‑1

.

LLW

MA

‑2In

dete

rmin

ate

Inde

term

inat

e‑‑

2,50

0 to

7,5

00

(PN

NL‑

1475

3)0.

2‑‑

Unc

erta

in o

f flow

dire

ctio

n. G

radi

ent t

oo lo

w

to d

eter

min

e flo

w ra

te.

LLW

MA

‑3Ea

st‑

north

east

0.04

to 0

.16

Dar

cy2.

5 to

10

(PN

NL‑

1475

3)0.

1 (P

NN

L‑14

753)

0.00

16Fl

ow d

irect

ion

and

grad

ient

from

wat

er ta

ble

map

.

LLW

MA

‑4Ea

st0.

1 to

0.4

Dar

cy2.

5 to

10

(PN

NL‑

1475

3)0.

1 (P

NN

L‑14

753)

0.00

4Fl

ow d

irect

ion

and

grad

ient

are

var

iabl

e du

e to

ef

fect

s of t

he p

ump‑

and‑

treat

syst

em.

NR

DW

LSo

uthe

ast

0.02

6 to

0.2

3D

arcy

518

to 1

,524

(W

HC

‑EP‑

0021

)‑‑

0.00

0015

Unc

erta

inty

with

gra

dien

t and

rate

of fl

ow.

Flow

dire

ctio

n in

ferr

ed fr

om p

lum

e m

aps.



Tabl

e B

‑1.

(Con

t.)

Site

Flow

D

irec

tion

Flow

Rat

e (m

/day

)M

etho

d

Hyd

raul

ic

Con

duct

ivity

(m

/day

) (So

urce

)E

ffec

tive

Poro

sity

aG

radi

entb

Com

men

ts

PUR

EX C

ribs

East

0.00

1 to

0.6

0D

arcy

18 to

3,0

00

(PN

NL‑

1152

3)‑‑

0.00

002

Flow

dire

ctio

n an

d gr

adie

nt d

eter

min

ed fr

om

trend

surf

ace

anal

ysis

(see

Sec

tion

10.3

.2).

WM

A A

‑AX

Sout

heas

t0.

13 to

0.4

0D

arcy

1,98

1 (P

NL‑

8337

; W

HC

‑SD

‑EN

‑TI‑

019)

‑‑0.

0000

2U

ncer

tain

ty w

ith g

radi

ent a

nd ra

te o

f flow

. Fl

ow d

irect

ion

infe

rred

from

plu

me

map

s.

WM

A B

‑BX

‑BY

Nor

th‑

north

wes

tIn

dete

rmin

ate

‑‑73

to 2

,520

(P

NN

L‑68

20)

0.3

Inde

term

inat

eU

ncer

tain

ty w

ith g

radi

ent a

nd ra

te o

f flow

(s

ee S

ectio

n 9.

3.3)

. M

axim

um h

ydra

ulic

co

nduc

tivity

bas

ed o

n aq

uife

r tes

t dat

a.d

WM

A C

Sout

herly

Inde

term

inat

e‑‑

1890

to 6

,888

(P

NN

L‑14

656)

0.3

Inde

term

inat

e

The

Tc‑9

9 pl

ume

confi

gura

tion,

ion

chem

istry

co

mpa

rison

, and

Tc‑

99 tr

end

com

paris

ons

prov

ide

cons

iste

nt in

dica

tion

of so

uthw

est

flow

; Tc‑

99 tr

end

mar

kers

bet

wee

n w

ells

29

9‑E2

7‑23

and

299

‑E27

‑21

indi

cate

ave

rage

flo

w ra

te.

WM

A S

‑SX

East

to

east

‑sou

thea

st0.

07 to

0.1

4C

onta

min

ant

trave

l tim

e (P

NN

L‑13

441)

NA

NA

NA

Bas

ed o

n in

ferr

ed c

onta

min

ant t

rave

l tim

e be

twee

n 21

6‑S‑

25 C

rib a

nd d

owng

radi

ent

wel

ls 2

99‑W

23‑1

5 an

d 29

9‑W

22‑4

6, a

nd

betw

een

wel

ls 2

99‑W

22‑4

6 an

d 29

9‑W

22‑8

3.

East

0.01

1 to

0.2

7 (B

est v

alue

: 0.

088)

Dar

cy1.

33 to

14.

4 (B

est v

alue

: 6.1

) (P

NN

L‑13

514;

PN

NL‑

1411

3)

0.09

to 0

.20

(Bes

t val

ue:

0.12

)0.

0017

Gra

dien

t det

erm

ined

by

trend

surf

ace

anal

ysis

.

WM

A T

East

0.12

to 0

.19

(PN

NL‑

1773

2)D

arcy

6.11

to 9

.69

(PN

NL‑

1773

2)0.

10.

002

Flow

dire

ctio

n ba

sed

on tr

end

surf

ace

anal

ysis

. Fl

ow d

irect

ion

and

grad

ient

influ

ence

d by

pu

mp‑

and‑

treat

.

WM

A T

X‑T

YVa

riabl

e (s

ee te

xt

disc

ussi

on)

NA

NA

0.07

to 1

9.9

(PN

NL

1827

9)0.

18 (D

OE/

RL‑

2009

‑38)

NA

Flow

dire

ctio

n an

d ra

te in

fluen

ced

by

200‑

ZP‑1

pum

p‑an

d‑tre

at sy

stem

.

WM

A U

East

to

east

‑nor

thea

st0.

018

to 0

.20

(Bes

t val

ue:

0.07

7)D

arcy

1.69

to 9

.5

(Bes

t val

ue: 6

.12)

(P

NN

L‑13

378)

0.10

to 0

.20

(Bes

t val

ue:

0.17

)0.

0022

Gra

dien

t det

erm

ined

by

trend

surf

ace

anal

ysis

.

a. E

ffect

ive

poro

sity

ass

umed

to b

e be

twee

n 0.

1 an

d 0.

3, a

repr

esen

tativ

e ra

nge

for t

he u

ncon

fined

aqu

ifer s

yste

m, u

nles

s oth

erw

ise

note

d.

b. M

arch

201

0, u

nles

s not

ed o

ther

wis

e.

c. F

low

dire

ctio

n is

bas

ed o

n th

ose

dete

rmin

ed o

n a

regi

onal

bas

is.

d.

Slug

Tes

t Cha

ract

eriz

atio

n Re

sults

for

Mul

ti‑Te

st/D

epth

Int

erva

ls C

ondu

cted

Dur

ing

the

Dri

lling

of W

MA

B‑BX

‑BY

Wel

l 299

‑E33

‑49

(C42

61),

lette

r re

port,

F. A

. Spa

ne a

nd

D. R

. New

com

er, P

acifi

c N

orth

wes

t Nat

iona

l Lab

orat

ory,

dat

ed O

ctob

er 8

, 200

4.

NA

= n

ot a

pplic

able



Table B‑2. Upgradient/Downgradient Comparison Values Used for Statistical Comparisons at RCRA Sites, CY 2010

QuarterSpecific Conductance Critical Mean (µS/cm) pH Critical Range

TOC Critical Meana,b/LOQ (µg/L)

TOX Critical Meana/ LOQ (µg/L)

116‑N‑1 (1301‑N) FacilityJan. to Mar. 2010 1,600 5.97 – 9.33 3,760/1,130 26.3/11.4July to Sept. 2010 1,600 5.97 – 9.33 3,760/990 26.3/12.0

120‑N‑1 and 120‑N‑2 (1324‑N/NA) FacilitiesApr. to June 2010 750 7.11 – 8.79 870/1,040 13.9/12.0Oct. to Dec. 2010 750 7.11 – 8.79 870/210 13.9/11.8

116‑N‑3 (1325‑N) FacilityJan. to Mar. 2010 510 7.17 – 8.76 1,250/1,040 24.2/11.4July to Sept. 2010 510 7.17 – 8.76 1,250/210 24.2/12.0

216‑A‑29 DitchApr. to June 2010 260 6.96 – 9.62 1,280/1,040 20.712.0Oct. to Dec. 2010 260 6.96 – 9.62 1,280/210 20.7/11.8

216‑B‑3 PondJan. to Mar. 2010 390 6.29 – 9.92 1,010/1,130 10.6/11.4July to Sept. 2010 390 6.29 – 9.92 1,010/990 10.6/12.0

216‑B‑63 TrenchApr. to June 2010 980 7.25 to 8.62 930/1,040 19.9/12.0Oct. to Dec. 2010 980 7.25 to 8.62 930/210 19.9/11.8

216‑S‑10 Pond and DitchApr. to June 2010 360 7.27 to 8.18 23,950/1,040 20.8/12.0Oct. to Dec. 2010 360 7.27 to 8.18 23,950/210 20.8/11.8

LLWMA‑1Apr. to June 2010 910 7.48 to 8.43 590/1,040 17.5/12.0Oct. to Dec. 2010 910 7.48 to 8.43 590/210 17.5/11.8

LLWMA‑2Apr. to June 2010 1,280 6.85 to 8.56 3,036/1,040 91.0/12.0Oct. to Dec. 2010 1,280 6.85 to 8.56 3,036/210 91.0/11.8

LLWMA‑3No statistical comparisons until new baseline is established.LLWMA‑4

Jan. to Mar. 2010 770 6.94 to 8.91 900/1,130 25.9/11.4July to Sept. 2010 770 6.94 to 8.91 900/990 25.9/12.0

NRDWLJan. to Mar. 2010 590 6.79 to 7.72 925/1,130 22.5/11.4July to Sept. 2010 590 6.79 to 7.72 925/990 22.5/12.0

a. Upgradient/downgradient comparison values (in bold) for TOC and TOX are the larger of calculated critical mean value and limit of quantitation for the respective quarter.

b. Reported values rounded to the nearest 10 µg/L.

c. Critical mean value could not be calculated because essentially all measurements were below vendor specified method detection limit.

LOQ = limit of quantitation; based on field blanks collected and analyzed in the previous four quarters

NC = not calculated

TOC = total organic carbon

TOX = total organic halides



Table B‑3. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 100‑N Area Units

Well Numbera Comment W

AC

‑Com

plia

nt

Contamination Indicator Parameters Other Parameters

Sampled as Scheduled

in Reporting PeriodSp

ecifi

c C

ondu

ctan

ce

(Fie

ld)

pH (F

ield

)

TOC

TOX

Alk

alin

ity

Alp

hab

Ani

ons

Met

als

(Filt

ered

)

116‑N‑1 (1301‑N) Liquid Waste Disposal Facility199‑N‑105A ‑‑ C S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑2 ‑‑ P S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑3 ‑‑ P S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑34 ‑‑ P S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑57 ‑‑ C S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 120‑N‑1 and 120‑N‑2 (1324‑N/NA) Facilities199‑N‑71 ‑‑ C S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑72 ‑‑ C S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑73 ‑‑ C S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes

199‑N‑77 Bottom of aquifer; no statistics C S S S S A S A A Yes

199‑N‑165 ‑‑ C S S S S A A A A Yes116‑N‑3 (1325‑N) Liquid Waste Disposal Facility

199‑N‑28 Information only; no statistics P S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes

199‑N‑32 ‑‑ P S S S S S ‑‑ S S Yes 199‑N‑41 ‑‑ P S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑74 ‑‑ C S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes 199‑N‑81 ‑‑ C S S S S A ‑‑ A A Yes Notes:

1. Requirements from Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 1301‑N, 1324‑N/NA, and 1325‑N RCRA Facilities (PNNL‑13914).

2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.

a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.

b. Monitored for Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

A = to be sampled annually

C = well is constructed as a resource protection well in accordance with WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”

F = fiscal year

P = constructed prior to WAC requirements

S = to be sampled semiannually





Table B‑4. Critical Means for 1301‑N (116‑N‑1) Liquid Waste Disposal Facility for CY 2011 Comparisons

Table B‑5. Critical Means for 1324‑NA (120‑N‑1) Percolation Pond and 1324‑N (120‑N‑2) Surface Impoundment for CY 2011 Comparisons

Constituent (units) n df Mean

Standard Deviation

CV (%) tc

Critical Mean

pH 8 7 7.771 0.3689 4.7 6.0818 5.39 – 10.15Specific conductance (µS/cm) 8 7 662.1 224.1 33.8 5.4079 1,950

TOC* (µg/L) 8 7 599.7 304.5 50.8 5.4079 2,350TOX* (µg/L) 7 6 6.090 4.281 70.3 5.9588 33.4Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from March 2009 through September 2010 for upgradient wells 199‑N‑34 and 199‑N‑57.

* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.

CV = coefficient of variation

df = degrees of freedom (n‑1)

n = number of background replicate averages

tc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and 20 comparisons



Constituent (unit) n df Mean

Standard Deviation

CV (%) tc

Critical Mean

pH 5 4 7.97 0.0589 0.74 9.7291 7.34 – 8.59Specific conductance (µS/cm) 5 4 480.6 34.2703 7.13 8.1216 785

TOC* (µg/L) 5 4 382.7 53.352 13.9 8.1216 860TOX* (µg/L) 6 5 4.52 1.6176 35.8 6.5414 15.9Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from upgradient well 199‑N‑71, June 2008 through August 2010.





tc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and sixteen comparisons





Table B‑6. Critical Means for 1325‑N (116‑N‑3) Liquid Waste Disposal Facility for CY 2011 Comparisons

Table B‑7. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 116‑H‑6 Evaporation Basins


Standard Deviation

CV (%) tc

Critical Mean

pH 5 4 8.016 0.0840 1.05 9.729074 7.12 ‑ 8.91Specific conductance (µS/cm) 5 4 404.0 12.93 3.2 8.121637 520

TOC* (µg/L) 5 4 200.9 94.76 47.2 8.121637 1,040TOC* (µg/L) 6 5 5.205 2.303 44.3 6.541442 21.5Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from September 2008 through September 2010 for upgradient well 199‑N‑74.





tc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and sixteen comparisons



Well Number Comment W

AC

‑Com

plia

nt Permit‑Specified Other Parameters


in Reporting PeriodbC

hrom

ium

(F

ilter

ed)

Nitr

ate

Tc‑9

9a

Fluo

ride

Ura

nium

a

Alk

alin

ity

Ani

ons

Met

als

(Filt

ered

)

199‑H4‑12A Extraction well C A A A A A A A A Yes

199‑H4‑12C Extraction well; mid‑depth unconfined C A A A A A A A A Yes

199‑H4‑3 Extraction well P A A A A A A A A Yes199‑H4‑8 ‑‑ C A A A A A A A A Yes

Notes:1. Requirements from Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 183‑H Solar Evaporation Basins (PNNL‑11573) and 2008 Permit modification (WA7890008967, Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit, Dangerous Waste Portion, Revision 8C, for the Treatment, Storage, and Disposal of Dangerous Waste).


a. Radionuclides not typically subject to RCRA monitoring but included in the current Hanford Facility RCRA Permit (WA7890008967) for this facility.

b. 183‑H wells are typically sampled in November (sampled in December 2010).

c. Well 199‑H4‑12C begin extraction operations in August 2010.


C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”




Table B‑8. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑A‑29 Ditch


AC

‑Com

plia

nt

Contamination Indicator Parameters

Other Parameters


in 2010Spec

ific.

C

ondu

ctan

ce

(Fie

ld)

pH (F

ield

)

TOC

TOX

Alk

alin

ity

Ani

ons

Met

als

Phen

ols

299‑E25‑26 Upper unconfined C S S S S S S A A Nob

299‑E25‑28 Deep unconfined; no statistics C A A A A A A A A Yes

299‑E25‑32P ‑‑ C S S S S S S A A Yes299‑E25‑34 ‑‑ C A A A A A A A A Yes299‑E25‑35 ‑‑ C S S S S S S A A Yes299‑E25‑48 ‑‑ C S S S S S S A A Yes299‑E26‑12 ‑‑ C A A A A A A A A Yes299‑E26‑13 ‑‑ C S S S S S S A A Yes699‑43‑45 ‑‑ C S S S S S S A A Noc

Notes:

1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑A‑29 Ditch (DOE/RL‑2008‑58).


a. Upgradient well(s) are noted in bold italic.

b. Well was not sampled for the year due to maintenance and pump issues.

c. The first 6‑month sample from this well was missed due to access restrictions.


C = well is constructed as a resource protection well in accordance with WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”




Table B‑9. Critical Means for 216‑A‑29 Ditch for CY 2011 Comparisons


Standard Deviation

CV (%) tc

Critical Mean


TOC* (µg/L) 8 7 428.44 248.06 57.9 5.8588 1970TOX* (µg/L) 8 7 3.630 1.097 30.2 5.8588 10.4Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from October 2007 through November 2010 for upgradient well 699‑43‑45.* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.CV = coefficient of variationdf = degrees of freedom (n‑1)n = number of background replicate averagestc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and 32 comparisonsTOC = total organic carbonTOX = total organic halides



Table B‑10. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑B‑3 Pond


AC

‑Com

plia

nt


Other Parameters


in 2010Spec

ific

Con

duct

ance

(F

ield

)

pH (F

ield

)

TOC

TOX

Alk

alin

ity

Alp

hab

Ani

ons

Bet

ab

Met

als

Phen

ols

699‑42‑42B Bottom of aquifer C S S S S A A A A A A Yes699‑43‑44 ‑‑ C S S S S A A A A A A Yes699‑43‑45 ‑‑ C S S S S A A A A A A Noc

699‑44‑39B ‑‑ C S S S S A A A A A A YesNotes:

1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑B‑3 Pond (DOE/RL‑2008‑59).

2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer, unless specified otherwise.

a. Upgradient well noted by bold italic.

b. Monitored for Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

c. Annual metals and phenol samples were missed due to lapse in sample scheduling.


C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standard for Construction and Maintenance of Wells”




Table B‑11. Critical Means for 216‑B‑3 Pond for CY 2011 Comparisons


Standard Deviation

CV (%) tc

Critical Mean

pH 6 5 8.034 0.138 1.7 7.6037 6.90 ‑ 9.17Specific conductance (µS/cm) 6 5 276 9.05 3.3 6.5414 340

TOC* (µg/L) 6 5 221.1 98.3 44.5 6.5414 920TOX* (µg/L) 6 5 3.375 1.38 40.8 6.5414 13.1Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from January 2008 through July 2010 for upgradient well 699‑44‑39B.* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.CV = coefficient of variationdf = degrees of freedom (n‑1)n = number of background replicate averagestc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and sixteen comparisonsTOC = total organic carbon




Table B‑12. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑B‑63 Trench

Well Number W

AC

‑Com

plia

nt


Other Parameters


in 2010Spec

ific

Con

duct

ance

(F

ield

)

pH (F

ield

)

TOC

TOX

Alk

alin

ity

Alp

haa

Ani

ons

Bet

aa

Met

als

Phen

ols

299‑E27‑8 C S S S S A S A S A A All sampled onceb

299‑E27‑9 C S S S S A S A S A A All sampled onceb

299‑E27‑11 C S S S S A A A A A A Yes299‑E27‑16 C S S S S A A A A A A Yes299‑E27‑17 C S S S S A A A A A A Yes299‑E27‑18 C S S S S A A A A A A Yes299‑E27‑19 C S S S S A A A A A A Yes299‑E33‑33 C S S S S A A A A A A All sampled onceb

299‑E33‑36 C S S S S A A A A A A All sampled onceb

299‑E33‑37 C S S S S A A A A A A Yes299‑E34‑8 C S S S S A A A A A A All sampled onceb

299‑E34‑10 C S S S S A A A A A A YesNotes:

1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑B‑63 Trench (DOE/RL‑2008‑60).


a. Monitored for Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

b. Sampled first half of calendar year 2010, well was dropped from the network with issuance of the revised groundwater monitoring plan in June 2010.








Table B‑13. Critical Means for 216‑B‑63 Trench for CY 2011 Comparisons


Standard Deviation

CV (%) tc

Critical Mean

pH 20 19 8.044 0.1337 1.7 4.5718 7.42 ‑ 8.67Specific conductance (µS/cm) 20 19 506.7 119.6 23.6 4.2669 1,030

TOC* (µg/L) 21 20 321.8 157.5 48.9 4.224 1,000TOX* (µg/L) 21 20 4.133 1.557 37.7 4.224 10.9Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from April 2009 through December 2010 for upgradient wells 299‑E27‑8, 299‑E27‑9, 299‑E27‑11, 299‑E27‑17, and 299‑E34‑10.* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.CV = coefficient of variationdf = degrees of freedom (n‑1)n = number of background replicate averagestc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and 48 comparisonsTOC = total organic carbonTOX = total organic halides

Table B‑14. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch


AC

‑Com

plia

nt


Other Parameters


During 2010Spec

ific

Con

duct

ance

(F

ield

)

pH (F

ield

)

TOC

TOX

Alk

alin

ity

Ani

ons

Car

bon

Tetr

achl

orid

e

Chl

orof

orm

Hex

aval

ent

Chr

omiu

m

Met

als

Phen

ols

Mer

cury

299‑W26‑13 ‑‑ C S S S S S A A A S A A S Yes299‑W26‑14 ‑‑ C A A A A A A A A A A A A Yes

299‑W27‑2 Bottom of aquifer; no statistics C A A A A A A A A A A A A Yes

699‑32‑76 Quarterly samplesb C S S S S S A A A S A A S Yes

699‑33‑75 Quarterly samplesb C S S S S S A A A S A A S Noc

699‑33‑76 Quarterly samplesb C S S S S S A A A S A A S Yes

Notes:1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch (DOE/RL‑2008‑61).2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer, unless specified otherwise.a. Upgradient well noted by bold italic.b. Second year of quarterly RCRA‑specific sampling for obtaining baseline conditions. Routine monitoring frequency will be semiannual as shown.c. The sample for the last quarter of 2010 was not collected due to the stop‑work that ran from September to November.A = to be sampled annuallyC = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance

of Wells”S = to be sampled semiannuallyTOC = total organic carbonTOX = total organic halides



Table B‑15. Critical Means for 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch for CY 2011 Comparisons


Standard Deviation

CV (%) tc

Critical Mean


TOC* (µg/L) 4 3 226.7 88.594 39.1 12.9240 1,510TOX* (µg/L) 4 3 5.71 0.8236 14.4 12.9240 17.6Note: Based on sampling events from August 2009 through August 2010 for new upgradient well 699‑33‑76.* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.CV = coefficient of variationdf = degrees of freedom (n‑1)n = number of background replicate averagestc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and twenty comparisonsTOC = total organic carbonTOX = total organic halides

Table B‑16. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for 316‑5 Process Trenches

Well Number Comment W

AC

‑Com

plia

nt

cis‑

1,2‑

Dic

hlor

oeth

ene

Tetr

achl

oroe

then

e

Tric

hlor

oeth

ene

Ura

nium

a


in 2010b

399‑1‑10A ‑‑ C S S S S Yes399‑1‑10B Lower unconfined C S S S S Missed July; resampled in August399‑1‑16A ‑‑ C S S S S Yes399‑1‑16B Lower unconfined C S S S S Missed July; resampled in August399‑1‑17A ‑‑ C S S S S Missed February; paperwork not prepared399‑1‑17B Lower unconfined C S S S S Yes399‑1‑18A ‑‑ C S S S S Yes399‑1‑18B Lower unconfined C S S S S Yes

Notes:

1. Requirements from Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 300 Area Process Trenches (WHC‑SD‑EN‑AP‑185).


a. Radionuclides not typically subject to RCRA monitoring, but included in the current Hanford Facility RCRA Permit (WA7890008967, Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit, Dangerous Waste Portion, Revision 8C, for the Treatment, Storage, and Disposal of Dangerous Waste) for this facility.

b. During the reporting period (January through December 2010), the 316‑5 Process Trenches wells were sampled in January, February, March, June, July, August, September, and December.


S = to be sampled four times semiannually (8 months)



Table B‑17. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for the Integrated Disposal Facility

Well Numbera W

AC

‑Com

plia

nt Indicator Parameters Other Parameters

Sampled as Scheduled in

2010Chr

omiu

m

(Filt

ered

)

Spec

ific

Con

duct

ance

(F

ield

)

pH (F

ield

)

TOC

TOX

Alk

alin

ity

Turb

idity

(F

ield

)

Ani

ons

Met

als

Alp

hab

Bet

ab

I‑12

9b

Tc‑9

9b

299‑E17‑22 C S c S c S c S c S c S S S S S S S S Yes299‑E17‑23 C S c S c S c S c S c S S S S S S S S Yes299‑E17‑25 C S c S c S c S c S c S S S S S S S S Yes299‑E17‑26 C S c S c S c S c S c S S S S S S S S Yes299‑E18‑1 C S c S c S c S c S c S S S S S S S S Yes299‑E24‑21 C S c S c S c S c S c S S S S S S S S Yes299‑E24‑24 C S c S c S c S c S c S S S S S S S S Yes

Notes:1. Requirements from Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application, Integrated Disposal Facility (DOE/RL‑2003‑12) and Integrated Disposal facility Operational Monitoring Plan to Meet DOE Order 435.1 (RPP‑PLAN‑26534).2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.b. Operational parameters monitored for DOE O 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management.c. To be sampled four times semiannually (total of eight times per well each year).d. The sample frequency on all samples was changed to annually with the approval of Ecology after the April 2010 sampling event. Annual sampling will begin in CY 2011 to maintain baseline monitoring.C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance

of Wells”S = to be sampled semiannuallyTOC = total organic carbonTOX = total organic halides

Table B‑18. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Liquid Effluent Retention Facility

Well Numbera W

AC

‑C

ompl

iant

Alk

alin

ity

Alp

hab

Am

mon

ium

Ani

ons

Bet

ab

Met

als

Phen

ols

VO

A


in 2010299‑E26‑10 C A S S A S A A S Yes299‑E26‑11 C A S S A S A A S Yes

299‑E26‑77 C A S S A S A A S Yes, resampled in December due to unsuccessful attempt in July

299‑E26‑79 C A S S A S A A S YesNotes:1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 200 East Area Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (WHC‑SD‑EN‑AP‑024).2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.b. Monitored for Atomic Energy Act of 1954.A = to be sampled annuallyC = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance

of Wells”S = to be sampled semiannuallyVOA = volatile organic analysis



Table B‑19. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 1

Well Namea Purpose W

AC

Com

plia

nt

Wat

er L

evel

b

RCRA Required Constituentsc

Supporting Constituentse

Sampled as

Scheduled in 2010

Contaminant Indicator Parameters

Groundwater Quality Parameters

Anionsd

Phen

olsd

Metals, Unfiltered, Filteredd

pHb

Spec

ific

Con

duct

ance

b

TOC

TOX

Chl

orid

e

Sulfa

te

Iron

Man

gane

se

Sodi

um

Alk

alin

ity

Dis

solv

ed

Oxy

genb

Tem

pera

ture

b

Turb

idity

b

299‑E28‑26 Upgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes



299‑E32‑2 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes


299‑E32‑4 Cross‑gradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes











299‑E33‑265 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Sampled once

299‑E33‑266 Downgradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Sampled once

Notes:

1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for LLBG WMA 1 (DOE/RL 2009 75).

a. Upgradient wells are noted in bold italic.

b. Field measurement.

c. Constituents and parameters required by 40 CFR 265.92, “Interim Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities,” “Sampling and Analysis.”

d. For anions, analytes include chloride, fluoride, nitrate, nitrite, and sulfate. For metals, analytes include (but are not limited to) calcium, chromium, iron, manganese, potassium, and sodium.

e. Constituents not required by RCRA but needed to support interpretation.





Y = well is constructed in accordance with WAC 173‑160 requirements



Table B‑20. Critical Means for Low‑Level Waste Management Area 1 for CY 2011 Comparisons


Standard Deviation

CV (%) tc

Critical Mean

pH 28 27 8.000 0.1276 1.6 4.4137 7.43 – 8.57Specific conductance (µS/cm) 28 27 562.94 128.11 22.8 4.1540 1,100

TOCa,b (µg/L) 27 26 268.31 249.56 93.0 4.1772 1,330TOXa (µg/L) 28 27 3.880 1.703 43.9 4.1540 11.1Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from upgradient wells 299‑E28‑26 and 299‑E28‑27: June 2009 through December 2010 for all indicators; upgradient wells 299‑E28‑28 and 299‑E32‑4: December 2008 through June 2010 for pH and specific conductance, June 2009 through January 2011 (December 2010 delayed sample) for TOC and TOX; from upgradient wells 299‑E33‑28, 299‑E33‑29; and 299‑E33‑35: December 2008 through July 2010 for pH and specific conductance, June 2009 through January 2011 for TOC and TOX.

a. For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.

b. Excluding erroneous data from June 2010.










Well Name Purpose W

AC

Com

plia

nt

Wat

er L

evel

c

RCRA Required Constituentsa

Supporting Constituentsb

Sampled as

Scheduled in 2010

Contaminant Indicator Parameters

Groundwater Quality Parameters

Anionsd

Phen

olsd

Metals, Unfiltered, Filteredd

pHc

Spec

ific

Con

duct

ance

c

TOC

TOX

Chl

orid

e

Sulfa

te

Iron

Man

gane

se

Sodi

um

Alk

alin

ity

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

nc

Tem

pera

ture

c

Turb

idity

c



299‑E27‑10 Cross‑gradient Y S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S Yes







Notes:

1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for LLBG WMA 2 (DOE/RL 2009 76).

a. Constituents and parameters required by 40 CFR 265.92, “Interim Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities,” “Sampling and Analysis.”

b. Constituents not required by RCRA but needed to support interpretation.

c. Field measurement.

d. For anions, analytes include chloride, fluoride, nitrate, nitrite, and sulfate. For metals, analytes include (but are not limited to) calcium, chromium, iron, manganese, potassium, and sodium.





Y = well is constructed in accordance with requirements of WAC 173‑160





Standard Deviation

CV (%) tc

Critical Mean

pH 6 5 7.80 0.111 1.4 9.0332 6.72 – 8.89Specific conductance (µS/cm) 6 5 1,046.4 49.27 4.7 7.7981 1,460

TOC* (µg/L) 6 5 689.1 181.3 26.3 7.7981 2,220TOX* (µg/L) 7 6 6.90 4.24 61.5 6.6568 37.1Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from April 2008 through December 2010 for upgradient well 299‑E27‑10.









Well Number W

AC

‑Com

plia

nt


Other Chemical Parameters


in 2010pH (F

ield

)

Spec

ific

Con

duct

ance

(F

ield

)

TOC

TOX

Alk

alin

ity

Ani

ons

Met

als

Phen

ols

299‑W7‑4 C S S S S A A A A No*299‑W10‑29 C S S S S A A A A Yes299‑W10‑30 C S S S S A A A A Yes299‑W10‑31 C S S S S A A A A Yes

Notes:

1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the LLBG WMA‑3 (DOE/RL‑2009‑68).


* Well 299‑W7‑4 added back to network as required in DOE/RL‑2009‑68.










AC

Com

plia

nt


Other Chemical Parameters


in 2010pH (F

ield

)

Spec

ific

Con

duct

ance

(F

ield

)

TOC

TOX

Alk

alin

ity

Ani

ons

Met

als

Phen

ols

299‑W15‑17 Deep unconfined; no statistics C S S S S S A A A Yes

299‑W15‑30 ‑‑ C S S S S S A A A Yes299‑W15‑83 ‑‑ C S S S S S A A A Yes299‑W15‑94 ‑‑ C S S S S S A A A Yes

299‑W15‑152 ‑‑ C S S S S S A A A Yes299‑W15‑224 ‑‑ C S S S S S A A A Yes

299‑W18‑21 Went dry in mid‑2010 C S S S S S A A A Nob

299‑W18‑22 Deep unconfined; no statistics C S S S S S A A A Yes

Notes:

1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the LLBG WMA‑4 (DOE/RL‑2009‑69).



b. Well 299‑W18‑21 was not sampled during the second half of the year as it went dry in July.










Standard Deviation

CV (%) tc

Critical Mean

pH 14 13 7.920 0.1892 2.4 4.6981 7.00 – 8.84Specific conductance (µS/cm) 13 12 497.5 54.79 11.0 4.4215 750TOCa,b (µg/L) 14 13 304.6 126.4 41.5 4.3191 870TOXa (µg/L) 12.0 11 5.983 3.866 64.6 4.5477 24.3Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from January 2007 through July 2007 for upgradient well 299‑W15‑15, from January 2007 through February 2010 for upgradient well 299‑W18‑21, and from February 2007 through May 2008 for upgradient well 299‑W18‑23.

a. For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.

b. Excluding “R” flagged data, February 2008.









Table B‑26. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for the Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill


AC

‑Com

plia

nt

Contamination Indicator ParametersOther Chemical

Parameters


in 2010pH (fi

eld)

Spec

ific

Con

duct

ance

(F

ield

)

TOC

TOX

Ani

ons

Met

als

Phen

ols

VO

A

699‑25‑33A Top of LPU; no statistics C S S S S S A A S Yes

699‑25‑34A ‑‑ C S S S S S A A S Nob

699‑25‑34B ‑‑ C S S S S S A A S Yes

699‑25‑34D ‑‑ C S S S S S A A S Yes

699‑26‑33 ‑‑ C S S S S S A A S Yes

699‑26‑34A ‑‑ C S S S S S A A S Yes

699‑26‑34B ‑‑ C S S S S S A A S Yes

699‑26‑35A ‑‑ C S S S S S A A S Yes

699‑26‑35C Top of LPU; no statistics C S S S S S A A S Yes

Notes:

1. Requirements from Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill and Interim Change Notice 1 (PNNL‑12227 and PNNL‑12227‑ICN‑1).

2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless otherwise specified.


b. The first semiannual sample for the January through April 2010 time period was not collected for well 699‑25‑34A because of limited resources by the sampling teams in the January through July 2010 time period.



LPU = low‑permeability unit in upper portion of Ringold Formation (within HSU‑5)




VOA = volatile organic analysis



Table B‑27. Critical Means for Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill for CY 2011 Comparisons


Standard Deviation

CV (%) tc

Critical Mean


TOC* (µg/L) 8 7 251.3 124.4 49.5 5.7282 1,010TOX* (µg/L) 8 7 3.722 1.671 44.9 5.7282 13.9Note: Based on semiannual sampling events from January 2009 through July 2010 for upgradient wells 699‑26‑34A and 699‑26‑35A.* For values reported below laboratory’s specified method detection limit, one‑half of the method detection limit is used in the critical mean calculation.CV = coefficient of variationdf = degrees of freedom (n‑1)n = number of background replicate averagestc = Bonferroni critical t‑value for appropriate df and 28 comparisonsTOC = total organic carbon


Table B‑28. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for RCRA PUREX Cribs 216‑A‑10, 216‑A‑36B, and 216‑A‑37‑1


AC

‑C

ompl

iant

Primary RCRA Constituent

Supporting Parameters


in 2010 Nitr

ate

Ani

ons

Met

als

Phen

ols

299‑E17‑1 216‑A‑10 P S S S A Yes299‑E17‑14 216‑A‑36B C Q Q Q A Yes299‑E17‑16 216‑A‑36B C S S S A Yes299‑E17‑18 216‑A‑36B C S S S A Yes299‑E17‑19 216‑A‑10 C S S S A Yes299‑E24‑16 216‑A‑10 C Q Q Q A Yes299‑E24‑18 Upgradient C S S S A Yes299‑E25‑17 216‑A‑37‑1 P S S S A Yes299‑E25‑19 216‑A‑37‑1 P Q Q Q A Yes299‑E25‑31 Upgradient C S S S A Yes699‑37‑47A Downgradient C S S S A Yes

Additional wells Far‑field ‑‑ b b ‑‑ ‑‑ See Appendix A for 200‑PO‑1Notes:1. Requirements from Combination RCRA Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 216‑A‑10, 216‑A‑36B, and 216‑A‑37‑1 PUREX Cribs (PNNL‑11523).2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer unless specified otherwise.a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.b. Far‑field wells sampled annually to triennially in conjunction with the 200‑PO‑1 OU.A = to be sampled annuallyC = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance

of Wells”P = constructed prior to WAC requirementsQ = to be sampled quarterly




Table B‑29. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area A‑AX

Well Numbera W

AC

‑Com

plia

nt Site‑Specific Constituents


in 2010Nitr

ate

Sodi

um

Sulfa

te

TOC

Chr

omiu

m

Lea

d

Alk

alin

ity

Ani

ons

Met

als

Tc‑9

9b

299‑E24‑20 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E24‑22 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E24‑33 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Noc

299‑E25‑2 P Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Noc

299‑E25‑40 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E25‑41 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E25‑93 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E25‑94 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E25‑236 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes

Notes:

1. Requirements from RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area A‑AX at the Hanford Site (PNNL‑15315).



b. Atomic Energy Act of 1954 parameter.

c. Samples not collected during fourth quarter as a result of the site‑wide stop work.

C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells


Q = to be sampled quarterly




Table B‑30. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area B‑BX‑BY

Well Number* W

AC

‑C

ompl

iant

RCRA Parameters AEA Parameters

Sampled as Scheduled in 2010A

lkal

inity

Ani

ons

Cya

nide

Met

als

Gam

ma

Tc‑9

9

Triti

um

Ura

nium

299‑E28‑8 P Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes

299‑E33‑7 P S S S S S S S SMissed second half of CY 2010 sample due to water below the pump inlet. Maintenance to

lower pump.

299‑E33‑9 P S S S S S S S S Missed second half of CY 2010 sample due to work stoppage.

299‑E33‑15 P S S S S S S S SDue to the work stoppage the second

semiannual sample was not collected until 1/4/11.

299‑E33‑16 P Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Third quarter sample missed due to maintenance issues.

299‑E33‑17 P A A A A ‑‑ A A A Yes299‑E33‑18 P Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑20 P A A A A ‑‑ A A A Yes299‑E33‑21 P A A A A ‑‑ A A A Yes

299‑E33‑26 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Fourth quarter sample missed due to maintenance issues.

299‑E33‑31 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑32 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑38 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑39 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑41 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑42 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑43 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑44 C Q Q Q Q S Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑47 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑48 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑49 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes

299‑E33‑334 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑335 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑337 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes

299‑E33‑338 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Due to the work stoppage the fourth quarter sample was not collected until 1/5/11.

299‑E33‑339 C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes

299‑E33‑205 C S S S S S S S S Missed second half of CY 2010 due to work stoppage.

299‑E33‑341 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Missed first quarter sample due to sample schedule lapse.

299‑E33‑342 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E33‑343 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes

299‑E33‑344 C S S S S Q S S SWell was scheduled for annual sampling only during CY 2010. Perched well that has not been formally accepted into the network.

299‑E33‑345 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes



Table B‑31. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area C

Well Namea Purpose W

ell

Con

stru

ctio

n St

anda

rd

pH Spec

ific

Con

duct

ance

Alk

alin

ity

Ani

ons

Cya

nide

Met

alsb ,

Unfi

ltere

d,

Filte

red

Wat

er L

evel

Sampled as Scheduled in 2010299‑E27‑4 Downgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q‑ Yes299‑E27‑7 Upgradient N Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E27‑12 Upgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Sampled in three of four quarters299‑E27‑13 Downgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E27‑14 Downgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E27‑15 Upgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E27‑21 Downgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E27‑22 Upgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q‑ Yes299‑E27‑23 Downgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E27‑155 Cross‑ to downgradient C SA SA SA SA SA SA SA Yes299‑E27‑24 Downgradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes299‑E27‑25 Cross‑gradient C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q YesNotes:1. Requirements from Interim Status Groundwater Quality Assessment Plan for the Single‑Shell Waste Management Area C (DOE/RL‑2009‑77).2. Water levels are measured in all wells before sampling. T he measurement frequency is provided.3. WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells.”a. Bold italic indicates upgradient well.b. Metals for groundwater quality include iron, manganese, and sodium.C = well constructed as a WAC 173‑160 resource protection wellsN = well constructed before requirements of WAC 173‑160 were applicable at the Hanford SiteQ = quarterly

SA = semiannually

Table B‑30. (Cont.)

Well Number* W

AC

‑C

ompl

iant

RCRA Parameters AEA Parameters

Sampled as Scheduled in 2010A

lkal

inity

Ani

ons

Cya

nide

Met

als

Gam

ma

Tc‑9

9

Triti

um

Ura

nium

Notes:1. Requirements from Groundwater Quality Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area B‑BX‑BY at the Hanford Site (PNNL‑13022‑ICN‑3).2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer.* Gradient nearly flat; indeterminate flow direction; no upgradient wells defined.A = to be sampled annuallyC = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC 173‑160, “Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance

of Wells”P = constructed prior to WAC requirementsQ = to be sampled quarterly




Table B‑32. Groundwater Assessment Volatile Organic Compound Monitoring at Waste Management Area C

Dangerous Waste Constituent Namea CAS #

Wells

299‑

E27

‑4

299‑

E27

‑7

299‑

E27

‑12

299‑

E27

‑13

299‑

E27

‑14

299‑

E27

‑15

299‑

E27

‑21

299‑

E27

‑22

299‑

E27

‑23

299‑

E27

‑155

Prop

osed

U

pgra

dien

t Wel

lb

Prop

osed

D

owng

radi

ent

Wel

lb

1,1‑Dichloroethane 75‑34‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,1‑Dichloroethylene 75‑35‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,1,1‑Trichloroethane 71‑55‑6 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,1,2,2‑Tetrachloroethane 79034‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,1,2‑Trichloroethane 79‑00‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,2‑Dibromoethane 106‑93‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,2‑Dichloroethane 107‑06‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,2‑Dichloropropane 78‑87‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,2,4‑Trichlorobenzene 120‑82‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,4‑Dichlorobenzene 106‑46‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X X1,4‑Dioxane 123‑91‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X2‑Butanone (MEK) 78‑93‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X X2‑Hexanone 591‑78‑6 X X X X X X X X X X X X2‑Propanone (Acetone) 67‑64‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X3‑Chloropropene 107‑05‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X4‑Methyl‑2‑petanone 108‑10‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X XAcetonitrile 75‑05‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X XAcrolein 107‑02‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X XAcrylonitrile 107‑13‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X XBenzene 71‑43‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X XBromomethane 74‑83‑9 X X X X X X X X X X X XCarbon disulfide 75‑15‑0 X X X X X X X X X X X XCarbon tetrachloride 56‑23‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X XChlorobenzene 108‑90‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X XChloroethene 75‑01‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X XChloroform 67‑66‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X XChloromethane 74‑87‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X XCis‑1,3‑dichloropropene 10061‑01‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X XDichlorodifluoro‑methane 75‑71‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X XDichloromethane 75‑09‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X XEthylbenzene 100‑41‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X XEthyl cyanide 107‑12‑0 X X X X X X X X X X X XMethacrylonitrile 126‑98‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X XStyrene 100‑42‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X XTetrachloroethene 127‑18‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X XToluene 108‑88‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X XTrans‑1,3‑dichloropropene 10061‑02‑6 X X X X X X X X X X X XTrichloroethylene 79‑01‑06 X X X X X X X X X X X XTrichlorofluoro‑methane 75‑69‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X XXylenes 1330‑20‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X Xa. Constituents collected and analyzed during the December sampling event. Constituents considered dangerous constituents, as defined in WAC 173‑303‑645(4) and based on the logic discussed in Section 9.2, will be retained for quarterly sampling for the first year, semiannual sampling in the second year, and annually thereafter, or until no longer required.

b. Wells will be sampled for constituents in the December sampling event if sample‑ready; otherwise, the wells are sampled in March.

CAS = Chemical Abstract Services



Table B‑33. Groundwater Assessment Semivolatile Organic Compound Monitoring at Waste Management Area C


Wells

299‑

E27

‑4

299‑

E27

‑7

299‑

E27

‑12

299‑

E27

‑13

299‑

E27

‑14

299‑

E27

‑15

299‑

E27

‑21

299‑

E27

‑22

299‑

E27

‑23

299‑

E27

‑155

Prop

osed

U

pgra

dien

t W

ellb

Prop

osed

D

owng

radi

ent

Wel

lb

1,2‑Dichlorobenzene 95‑50‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X

1,3‑Dichlorobenzene 541‑73‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X

2‑Chlorophenol 95‑57‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X X

2‑Methylphenol 95‑48‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X X

2‑Nitrophenol 88‑75‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X X

2‑sec‑Butyl‑4,6‑dinitrophenol 88‑85‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X X

2,4‑Dinitrotoluene 121‑14‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X

2,4,5‑Trichlorophenol 95‑95‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X X

2,4,6‑Trichlorophenol 88‑06‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X



Acenaphthene 83‑32‑9 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Acetophenone 98‑86‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Aldrin 309‑00‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Alpha‑BHC 319‑84‑6 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Benzo[a]pyrene 50‑32‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Beta‑BHC 319‑85‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Butylbenzylphthalate 85‑68‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Dibenzene[a,h]anthracene 53‑70‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Dieldrin 60‑57‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Di‑n‑butylphthalate 84‑74‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Diphenylamine 122‑39‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Endrin 72‑20‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Fluoranthene 206‑44‑0 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Gamma‑BHC 58‑89‑9 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Heptachlor 76‑44‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hexachlorobenzene 118‑74‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hexachlorobutadiene 87‑68‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hexachloroethane 67‑72‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Isodrin 465‑73‑6 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Naphthalene 91‑20‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Nitrobenzene 98‑95‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X X

N‑Nitrosodi‑methylamine 62‑75‑9 X X X X X X X X X X X X

N‑Nitrosodi‑propylamine 62164‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X X

n‑Nitrosomorpholine 59‑89‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X

p‑Chorol‑m‑cresol 59‑50‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Pentachloronitro‑benzene 82‑68‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Pentachlorophenol 87‑86‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Phenol 108‑95‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Pyrene 129‑00‑0 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Pyridine 110‑86‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X X

Toxaphene 8001‑35‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X X



Table B‑34. Groundwater Assessment Inorganic Constituent Monitoring at Waste Management Area C

Dangerous Waste Constituent

Namea CAS #

Wells

299‑

E27

‑4

299‑

E27

‑7

299‑

E27

‑12

299‑

E27

‑13

299‑

E27

‑14

299‑

E27

‑15

299‑

E27

‑21

299‑

E27

‑22

299‑

E27

‑23

299‑

E27

‑155

Prop

osed

U

pgra

dien

t W

ellb

Prop

osed

D

owng

radi

ent

Wel

lb

Antimony 7440‑36‑0 X X X X X X X X X X X XArsenic 7440‑38‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X XBarium 7440‑39‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X XBeryllium 7440‑41‑7 X X X X X X X X X X X XCadmium 7440‑43‑9 X X X X X X X X X X X XChromium 7440‑47‑3 X X X X X X X X X X X XCobalt 7440‑48‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X XCopper 7440‑50‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X XCyanide 57‑12‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X XLead 7439‑92‑1 X X X X X X X X X X X XMercury 7439‑97‑6 X X X X X X X X X X X XNickel 7440‑02‑0 X X X X X X X X X X X XSelenium 7782‑49‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X XSilver 7440‑22‑4 X X X X X X X X X X X XSulfide 18496‑25‑8 X X X X X X X X X X X XThallium 7440‑28‑0 X X X X X X X X X X X XTin 7440‑31‑5 X X X X X X X X X X X XVanadium 7440‑62‑2 X X X X X X X X X X X XZinc 7440‑66‑6 X X X X X X X X X X X Xa. Constituents will be collected and analyzed during December sampling event. Constituents considered dangerous constituents, as defined in WAC 173‑303‑645(4) and according to the logic discussed in Section 9.2, will be retained for quarterly sampling for the first year, semiannual sampling in the second year, and annually thereafter, or until no longer required.

b. Wells will be sampled for constituents in the December sampling event if sample‑ready; otherwise, the wells are sampled in March.

CAS = Chemical Abstract Services

Table B‑33. (Cont.)


Wells

299‑

E27

‑4

299‑

E27

‑7

299‑

E27

‑12

299‑

E27

‑13

299‑

E27

‑14

299‑

E27

‑15

299‑

E27

‑21

299‑

E27

‑22

299‑

E27

‑23

299‑

E27

‑155

Prop

osed

U

pgra

dien

t W

ellb

Prop

osed

D

owng

radi

ent

Wel

lb

a. Constituents collected and analyzed during December sampling event. Constituents considered dangerous constituents, as defined in WAC 173‑303‑645(4) and per the logic discussed in Section 9.2, will be retained for quarterly sampling for the first year, semiannual sampling in the second year, and annually thereafter, or until no longer required.b. Wells will be sampled for constituents in the December sampling event if sample‑ready; otherwise, the wells are sampled in March.CAS = Chemical Abstract Services



Table B‑35. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area S‑SX

Well Numbera W

AC

‑Com

plia

nt

RCRA Supporting Constituents


in 2010Chr

omiu

m

Nitr

ate

Alk

alin

ity

Ani

ons

Met

als

Se‑7

9

Tc‑9

9

Triti

um

Ura

nium

Gam

ma

299‑W22‑26 b P Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑44 C Q Q Q Q Q A Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑45 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑47 C Q Q Q Q Q A Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑48 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑49 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑50 C Q Q Q Q Q A Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑69 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑72 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑80 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑81 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑82 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑83 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑84 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes

299‑W22‑85 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ No; third quarter missed due to maintenance issue and stop work

299‑W22‑86 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W22‑89c C 2 2 2 2 2 ‑‑ 2 1 1 ‑‑ Yes299‑W23‑15 C Q Q Q Q Q ‑‑ Q A A ‑‑ Yes299‑W23‑19 C Q Q Q Q Q A Q A A A Yes

299‑W23‑20 C Q Q Q Q Q A Q A A ‑‑ No; fourth quarter missed due to stop work

299‑W23‑21 C Q Q Q Q Q A Q A A ‑‑ YesNotes:

1. Requirements from RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area S‑SX at the Hanford Site, Interim Change Notice 4 (PNNL‑12114‑ICN‑4).

2. Wells completed at the top of the unconfined aquifer.


b. Sampled during the reporting period; was added to the revised monitoring plan (DOE/RL‑2009‑73) for sampling in 2011.

c. New well installed in June 2010; sampled the indicated number of times; was added to the revised monitoring plan (DOE/RL‑2009‑73) for sampling in 2011.







Table B‑36. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area T

Well Number* Comment W

AC

‑Com

plia

nt

Constituents of Concern

Supporting Groundwater Quality Constituents and AEA Parameters


in 2010Chr

omiu

m

(Tot

al, F

ilter

ed)

Nitr

ate

Alk

alin

ity

Ani

ons

Gam

ma

Alp

ha

Bet

a

I‑12

9

Met

als

Tc‑9

9

Triti

um

299‑W10‑1 ‑‑ P Q Q Q Q A A ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑W10‑4 Not sampled second quarter P Q Q Q Q A A A ‑‑ Q Q Q No299‑W10‑8 Not sampled fourth quarter P Q Q Q Q ‑‑ A A ‑‑ Q Q Q No

299‑W10‑22 Removed from network in the revised monitoring plan C S S S S ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ S S S No

299‑W10‑23 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ A A ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑W10‑24 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q S S S ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑W10‑28 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ A A ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes

299‑W11‑7 Removed from network in the revised monitoring plan P S S S S ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ S S S No

299‑W11‑12 Not sampled first and fourth quarters P Q Q Q Q ‑‑ A A ‑‑ Q Q Q No

299‑W11‑39 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q S S S ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑W11‑40 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ A A ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑W11‑41 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q S S S A Q Q Q Yes299‑W11‑42 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q S S S ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes

299‑W11‑45

Extraction well; screened 8.5 to13 meters below water

table

Not sampled third and fourth quarters

C Q Q Q Q A A A ‑‑ Q Q Q No

299‑W11‑46 Extraction well; screened 6 to 12 meters below water table C Q Q Q Q S S S ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes

299‑W11‑47 Screened 9 to 18 meters below water table C Q Q Q Q S S S A Q Q Q Yes

Notes:

1. Requirements from RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area T (PNNL‑15301).


* Bold italic indicates upgradient well.








Table B‑37. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area TX‑TY


AC

‑Com

plia

nt

RCRA Parameters

Supporting Groundwater Quality Constituents and AEA Parameters

Sampled as

Scheduled in 2010C

hrom

ium

(T

otal

, Filt

ered

)

Nitr

ate

Alk

alin

ity

Ani

ons

Alp

ha

Bet

a

Gam

ma

I‑12

9

Met

als

Sr‑9

0

Tc‑9

9

Triti

um

299‑W10‑26 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q A A A ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes299‑W10‑27 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q A A A ‑‑ Q Q Q Yes

299‑W14‑6 Well went dry in fourth quarter P Q Q Q Q ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ Q Q Q No

299‑W14‑11 Screened 11 to 14.6 m below water table C Q Q Q Q A A S Q Q A Q Q Yes

299‑W14‑13 Not sampled in second, third, and fourth quarters C Q Q Q Q A A S Q Q A Q Q No

299‑W14‑14 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q A A A ‑‑ Q ‑‑ Q Q Yes299‑W14‑15 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q S S A Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Yes299‑W14‑16 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q S S ‑‑ Q Q ‑‑ Q Q Yes

299‑W14‑17 Not sampled in second and fourth quarters C Q Q Q Q A A ‑‑ Q Q ‑‑ Q Q No

299‑W14‑18 Not sampled in second quarter C Q Q Q Q A A A Q Q ‑‑ Q Q No

299‑W14‑19 Not sampled in second quarter C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ ‑‑ A ‑‑ Q ‑‑ Q Q No

299‑W15‑40 Extraction well C Q Q Q Q ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ Q ‑‑ Q Q Yes299‑W15‑41 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q A A A S Q ‑‑ Q Q Yes

299‑W15‑44bExtraction well; not

sampled in first and second quarters

C Q Q Q Q A A A S Q ‑‑ Q Q No

299‑W15‑763 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q A A A ‑‑ Q ‑‑ Q Q Yes

299‑W15‑765 Extraction well; not sampled in second quarter C Q Q Q Q A A A S Q ‑‑ Q Q No

Notes:

1. Requirements from RCRA Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area TX‑TY (PNNL‑16005).



b. Well 299‑W15‑44 was taken out of service as an extraction well and converted to a monitoring well by third quarter CY 2010.




Q = to be sampled quarterlyS = to be sampled semiannually



Table B‑38. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Waste Management Area U

Well Numbera W

AC

‑Com

plia

ntRCRA Supporting Parameters

Sampled as Scheduled in 2010bC

hrom

ium

Nitr

ate

Alk

alin

ity

Ani

ons

Met

als

Tc‑9

9

Gro

ss A

lpha

/B

eta

Gam

ma

299‑W18‑30 C Q Q Q Q Q Q A A Yes

299‑W18‑31 C Q Q Q Q Q Q A A Dry in fiscal year 2008





299‑W19‑44 C Q Q Q Q Q Q A A No; first quarter missed due to maintenance issue


299‑W19‑47 C Q Q Q Q Q Q A A YesNotes:

1. Requirement from Groundwater Quality Assessment Plan for Single‑Shell Tank Waste Management Area U, Interim Change Notice 2 (PNNL‑13612‑ICN‑2).



b. Fourth quarter sampling delayed from October to November/December for all wells due to stop work.






Tabl

e B

‑39.

Mon

itorin

g W

ells

and

Con

stitu

ents

for t

he K

E an

d K

W B

asin

s

Wel

lC

omm

ent

WAC‑Compliant

Con

tam

inan

ts o

f Con

cern

Sam

pled

as

Sche

dule

d in

201

0

Gross Alpha

Anions

Gross Beta

C‑14

Metals

Sr‑90

Tc‑99

Tritium

Alkalinity

Uranium (Total)

VOA

KE

Bas

in

199‑

K‑2

9‑‑

PQ

/MQ

Q/M

A/S

A/S

0/S

0/Q

M0/

S‑‑

‑‑N

o; sa

mpl

ed in

Dec

embe

r 201

0. D

ecom

mis

sion

ed in

D

ecem

ber 2

010

199‑

K‑3

0‑‑

PQ

QQ

A/S

S‑‑

0/S

Q0/

S‑‑

‑‑N

o; sa

mpl

ed in

Janu

ary,

Apr

il, a

nd D

ecem

ber 2

010.

D

ecom

mis

sion

ed in

Dec

embe

r 201

019

9‑K

‑32A

‑‑C

QQ

QA

/SA

/S‑‑

A/S

Q0/

S‑‑

‑‑Ye

s; sa

mpl

ed in

Mar

ch, J

une,

Sep

tem

ber,

and

Dec

embe

r 201

019

9‑K

‑110

A‑‑

CS

SS

‑‑A

/S‑‑

‑‑S

0/S

‑‑‑‑

Yes;

sam

pled

in A

pril

and

Dec

embe

r 201

0

199‑

K‑1

11A

‑‑C

Q/Q

QQ

/QA

A/S

‑‑A

/SQ

/Q0/

S‑‑

‑‑Ye

s; sa

mpl

ed in

Feb

ruar

y, M

arch

, Apr

il, Ju

ne, J

uly,

Sep

tem

ber,

and

Dec

embe

r 201

019

9‑K

‑141

‑‑C

0/S

0/S

0/S

0/S

0/S

0/S

0/S

0/S

0/S

‑‑‑‑

Yes;

sam

pled

in F

ebru

ary

and

July

201

019

9‑K

‑142

‑‑C

0/S

0/S

0/S

0/S

0/S

0/S

0/S

0/S

0/S

0/S

‑‑Ye

s; sa

mpl

ed in

Mar

ch, J

une,

Sep

tem

ber,

and

Dec

embe

r 201

0K

W B

asin

199‑

K‑3

1N

ot in

clud

ed in

m

onito

ring

plan

P0/

S0/

S0/

S‑‑

0/S

‑‑0/

A0/

S0/

A‑‑

‑‑Ye

s; sa

mpl

ed in

Mar

ch a

nd Ju

ne 2

010

199‑

K‑3

4‑‑

CQ

QQ

AS/

QA

AQ

0/A

0/A

‑‑Ye

s; sa

mpl

ed in

Apr

il, Ju

ne, S

epte

mbe

r, an

d D

ecem

ber 2

010

199‑

K‑1

06A

‑‑C

QQ

QA

/SS/

Q‑‑

0/Q

Q0/

S‑‑

0/S

No;

sam

pled

in M

arch

and

June

201

019

9‑K

‑107

A‑‑

CQ

QQ

AS/

QA

AQ

0/A

0/A

‑‑Ye

s; sa

mpl

ed in

Janu

ary,

Apr

il, Ju

ly, a

nd D

ecem

ber 2

010

199‑

K‑1

08A

‑‑C

SS

S0/

SS

‑‑‑‑

S0/

S‑‑

‑‑Ye

s; sa

mpl

ed in

Janu

ary,

Mar

ch, J

une,

Aug

ust,

Sept

embe

r, an

d D

ecem

ber 2

010

199‑

K‑1

32‑‑

CS/

QS/

QS/

QA

/SS/

Q‑‑

0/S

S/Q

0/S

‑‑0/

SYe

s; sa

mpl

ed in

Feb

ruar

y, Ju

ne, A

ugus

t, an

d N

ovem

ber 2

010

Not

es:

1. R

equi

rem

ents

from

Gro

undw

ater

Mon

itori

ng a

nd A

sses

smen

t Pla

n fo

r the

100

‑K A

rea

Fuel

Sto

rage

Bas

ins (

PNN

L‑14

033)

.2.

Fre

quen

cy re

quire

d un

der m

onito

ring

plan

is li

sted

firs

t. S

ome c

onst

ituen

ts ar

e sam

pled

mor

e fre

quen

tly d

urin

g ba

sin

clea

nout

; tho

se fr

eque

ncie

s are

list

ed af

ter t

he sl

ash.

For

exam

ple,

“0

/Q”

mea

ns n

ot re

quire

d un

der m

onito

ring

plan

but

cur

rent

ly sa

mpl

ed q

uarte

rly.

3. W

ells

are

com

plet

ed a

t the

top

of th

e un

confi

ned

aqui

fer.

4. S

ampl

ing

abbr

evia

tions

use

d in

this

tabl

e ar

e as

follo

ws:

A

= to

be

sam

pled

ann

ually

C

= w

ell i

s con

stru

cted

as a

reso

urce

pro

tect

ion

wel

l und

er W

AC

173

‑160

, “M

inim

um S

tand

ard

for C

onst

ruct

ion

and

Mai

nten

ance

of W

ells

”M

=

to b

e sa

mpl

ed m

onth

lyP

= co

nstru

cted

prio

r to

WA

C re

quire

men

tsQ

=

to b

e sa

mpl

ed q

uarte

rlyS

= to

be

sam

pled

sem

iann

ually



Table B‑40. Monitoring Wells, Constituents, and Enforcement Limits for 200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility

Well Number* W

AC

‑Com

plia

ntConstituents with

Enforcement Limits Other Constituents


in 2010pH (6

.5 to

8.5

)

Cad

miu

m (5

µg

/L)

Lea

d (1

0 µg

/L)

Spec

ific

Con

duct

ance

Alp

ha

Ani

ons

Bet

a

Met

als

Tota

l Dis

solv

ed

Solid

s

Trac

e M

etal

s

Triti

um

699‑40‑36 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q A Yes

699‑41‑35 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q A Yes699‑42‑37 C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q A YesNotes:

1. Requirements from Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Hanford Site 200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility (PNNL‑13032).

2. All wells completed at the top of the Ringold Formation confined aquifer.

* Bold italic indicates upgradient well.




Table B‑41. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility

Well Numbera W

AC

‑Com

plia

nt

Alk

alin

ity

Alp

ha

Ani

ons

Bet

a

C‑1

4

I‑‑2

9

Met

als

Rad

ium

b

Tota

l Dis

solv

ed

Solid

s

Tc‑9

9

TOX

Ura

nium

VO

A Sampled as Scheduled

in 2010699‑35‑66A P S S S S S S S S S S S S S Yes699‑36‑66B C S S S S S S S S S S S S S Yes699‑36‑70A C S S S S S S S S S S S S S Yes699‑37‑66 C S S S S S S S S S S S S S YesNotes:

1. Requirements from Groundwater Protection Plan for the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (WCH‑198).



b. Total alpha energy emitted from radium.





VOA = volatile organic analyte



Table B‑42. Monitoring Wells and Constituents for Solid Waste Landfill


AC

‑Com

plia

nt


Other Parameters


in 2010Am

mon

ia

Che

mic

al O

xyge

n D

eman

d

Chl

orid

e

Iron

(Filt

ered

)

Man

gane

se (F

ilter

ed)

Zin

c (F

ilter

ed)

Nitr

ate

Nitr

ite

pH (F

ield

)

Spec

ific

Con

duct

ance

(F

ield

)

Sulfa

te

Tem

pera

ture

(Fie

ld)

Col

iform

Bac

teri

a

TOC

Ani

ons

Met

als (

Filte

red)

Ars

enic

(Filt

ered

)

VO

A

699‑22‑35 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Nob

699‑23‑34A ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes699‑23‑34B ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes

699‑24‑33Information

only; no statistics

P Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes

699‑24‑34A ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes699‑24‑34B ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Nob

699‑24‑34C ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes699‑24‑35 ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Nob

699‑26‑35A ‑‑ C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q YesNotes:

1. Requirements from Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Solid Waste Landfill (PNNL‑13014).



b. Well not sampled as scheduled in December 2010 due to large sampling load after work stoppage in October 2010.





VOA = volatile organic analysis



Table B‑43. Monitoring Wells, Constituents, and Enforcement Limits for State‑Approved Land Disposal Site

Well Comment

Constituents with Enforcement Limits Other Constituents


for CY 2010WA

C C

ompl

iant

pH Ace

tone

Ben

zene

Cad

miu

m *

Chl

orof

orm

Cop

per

*

Lea

d *

Mer

cury

*

Sulfa

te

Tetr

ahyd

rofu

ran

Tota

l Dis

solv

ed

Solid

s

Spec

ific

Con

duct

ance

Alp

ha

Bet

a

Sr‑9

0

Triti

um

299‑W6‑6 Bottom of unconfined C ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ A Yes

299‑W6‑11 ‑‑ C ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ A Yes299‑W6‑12 ‑‑ C ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ A Yes

299‑W7‑3 Bottom of unconfined C ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ S Yes

299‑W8‑1 ‑‑ C ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ A Yes699‑48‑71 Unconfined P ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ A Yes

699‑48‑77A Ringold Formation unit E, upper C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes

699‑48‑77CRingold Formation unit E, middle to lower

C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes

699‑48‑77D Ringold Formation unit E, upper C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Yes

699‑49‑79 ‑‑ P ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ A Yes699‑51‑75 ‑‑ P ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ S Yes699‑51‑75P Lower unconfined P ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ ‑‑ A YesNotes:

1. Requirements are from Groundwater Monitoring and Tritium Tracking Plan for the 200 Area State‑Approved Land Disposal Site (PNNL‑13121).

2. Wells are completed at the top of the aquifer unless specified otherwise

* Filtered and unfiltered samples.


C = well is constructed as a resource protection well under WAC‑173‑160






Table B‑44. A

nalytical Results fo

r Required Con

stitu

ents at the Solid W

aste Landfi

ll

Con

stitu

enta

Dat

e69

9‑22

‑35

699‑

23‑3

4A69

9‑23

‑34B

699‑

24‑3

369

9‑24

‑34A

699‑

24‑3

4B69

9‑24

‑34C

699‑

24‑3

569

9‑26

‑35A

Am

mon

ium

ion

(µg/

L)

BTV

= 9

0 µg

/Lb

1/19

/10

5.54

<4.3

85.

545.

804.

897.

474.

7716

.7<4

.38

4/20

‑21/

10<4

.38

<4.3

8<4

.38

<4.3

814

.0<4

.38

12.9

23.7

<4.3

87/

19/1

014

.610

.639

.351

.326

.521

.634

.315

.611

.212

/6/1

0SN

C<3

.09

<3.0

912

.6<3

.09

SNC

<3.0

9SN

C<3

.09

Che

mic

al o

xyge

n de

man

d (m

g/L)

BTV

= 1

0 m

g/L

1/19

/10

<10

<10

<10

<10

<10

<10

<10

<10

<10

4/20

‑21/

10<1

0<1

0<1

0<1

0<1

0<1

0<1

0<1

0<1

07/

19/1

0<1

0<1

0<1

0<1

0<1

0<1

0<1

0<1

0<1

012

/6/1

0SN

C<1

0<1

0<1

0<1

0SN

C<1

0SN

C<1

0

Chl

orid

e (m

g/L)

BTV

= 7

.82

mg/

L

1/19

/10

6.18

6.22

5.86

6.52

6.83

6.40

6.47

5.95

7.10

4/20

‑21/

106.

376.

275.

856.

536.

846.

436.

606.

007.

117/

19/1

07.

287.

146.

627.

167.

427.

17.

196.

447.

4112

/6/1

0SN

CN

AR

NA

R7.

037.

37SN

C7.

12SN

C7.

53

Col

iform

bac

teria

(c

olon

ies/

100m

L)

BTV

=

1 co

l./10

0 m

l

1/19

/10

<1<1

<1<1

3.1

<1<1

<1<1

4/20

‑21/

100

00

00

00

00

7/19

/10

<1<1

<1<1

<1<1

<1<1

<112

/6/1

0SN

CN

AR

NA

RN

AR

NA

RSN

CN

AR

SNC

NA

R

Iron

(filte

red)

(µ

g/L)

BTV

= 1

60 µ

g/L

1/19

/10

<18

38.7

25.9

<18

42.7

77.6

54.2

34.3

20.5

4/20

‑21/

1021

.123

.0<1

8<1

866

.814

943

.919

.6<1

87/

19/1

029

.541

.038

.0<1

836

.073

.020

.0<1

8<1

812

/6/1

0SN

C<3

8<3

8<3

8<3

8SN

C<3

8SN

C<3

8

Man

gane

se

(filte

red)

(µ

g/L)

BTV

= 1

8 µg

/L

1/19

/10

<4.0

<4.0

<4.0

<4.0

<4.0

<4.0

<4.0

<4.0

<4.0

4/20

‑21/

10<4

.0<4

.0<4

.0<4

.0<4

.0<4

.0<4

.0<4

.0<4

.07/

19/1

0<4

.0<4

.0<4

.0<4

.0<4

.0<4

.0<4

.0<4

.0<4

.012

/6/1

0SN

C<4

.0<4

.0<4

.0<4

.0SN

C<4

.0SN

C<4

.0

Nitr

ate

(mg/

L)

BTV

= 2

9 m

g/L

1/19

/10

17.8

19.4

17.4

14.9

13.9

15.2

14.7

12.8

17.9

4/20

‑21/

1018

.220

.117

.815

.114

.416

.115

.213

.218

.17/

19/1

018

.119

.517

.815

.114

.316

.014

.612

.517

.912

/6/1

0SN

CN

AR

NA

R15

.114

.2SN

C14

.4SN

C18

.2

Nitr

ite (µ

g/L)

BTV

= 2

66 µ

g/L

1/19

/10

<118

<118

<118

<118

<118

<118

<118

<118

<118

4/20

/10

to 4

/21/

10<1

18<1

18<1

18<1

18<1

18<1

18<1

18<1

18<1

18

7/19

/10

<118

<118

<118

<118

<118

<118

<118

<118

<118

12/6

/10

SNC

NA

RN

AR

<118

<118

SNC

<118

SNC

<118



Tabl

e B

‑44.

(C

ont.)

Con

stitu

enta

Dat

e69

9‑22

‑35

699‑

23‑3

4A69

9‑23

‑34B

699‑

24‑3

369

9‑24

‑34A

699‑

24‑3

4B69

9‑24

‑34C

699‑

24‑3

569

9‑26

‑35A

pH m

easu

rem

ent

BTR

= 6

.68‑

7.84

1/19

/10

6.95

6.65

6.67

6.86

6.7

6.71

6.96

6.87

7.27

4/20

/10

to 4

/21/

106.

916.

636.

646.

866.

816.

857.

606.

837.

267/

19/1

06.

936.

676.

666.

956.

746.

706.

856.

857.

3312

/6/1

0SN

C6.

676.

666.

986.

96SN

C7.

21SN

C7.

29Sp

ecifi

c co

nduc

tanc

e (µ

S/cm

)

BTV

=

583

µS/c

m

1/19

/10

788

741

738

753

668

682

712

573

534

4/20

/10

to 4

/21/

1080

675

875

075

065

267

672

556

553

27/

19/1

081

275

875

773

266

268

972

556

652

2

12/6

/10

SNC

758

747

742

650

SNC

720

SNC

534

Sulfa

te (m

g/L)

BTV

= 4

7.2

mg/

L

1/19

/10

43.3

48.4

45.3

44.3

45.7

46.0

42.5

44.9

40.0

4/20

/10

to 4

/21/

1044

.349

.245

.345

.447

.047

.343

.946

.140

.97/

19/1

043

.948

.844

.844

.546

.346

.743

.644

.740

.512

/6/1

0SN

CN

AR

NA

R44

.346

.8SN

C43

.4SN

C40

.7

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

BTV

= 2

0.7°

C

1/19

/10

16.7

18.6

18.0

19.2

17.2

18.5

18.2

17.0

19.0

4/20

/10

to 4

/21/

1019

.418

.117

.919

.618

.118

.518

.417

.819

.77/

19/1

019

.420

.320

.019

.920

.622

.620

.818

.519

.612

/6/1

0SN

C17

.917

.719

.215

.7SN

C16

.5SN

C18

.8

TOC

(µg/

L)

BTV

=

1,20

0 µg

/L

1/19

/10

434

430

461

319

350

300

364

300

300

4/20

/10

to 4

/21/

1078

387

286

476

056

455

954

449

841

77/

19/1

043

548

754

143

533

232

839

830

530

012

/6/1

0SN

C88

61,

000

881

699

SNC

837

SNC

536

Zinc

(filte

red)

(µ

g/L)

BTV

= 4

2.3

µg/L

1/19

/10

<6<6

<67.

5<6

<66.

5<6

7.1

4/20

/10

to 4

/21/

10<6

<6<6

9.2

<6<6

7.6

6.3

<67/

19/1

06.

5<6

<6<6

<6<6

8.0

6.0

<612

/6/1

0SN

C<4

<46.

0<4

SNC

12.0

SNC

5.0

Not

e: R

esul

ts in

bol

d ex

ceed

bac

kgro

und

thre

shol

d va

lues

.a.

WA

C 1

73‑3

04, “

Min

imum

Fun

ctio

nal S

tand

ards

for S

olid

Was

te H

andl

ing.

”b.

201

0 B

ackg

roun

d th

resh

old

valu

es o

btai

ned

from

Tab

le C

‑41

of H

anfo

rd S

ite G

roun

dwat

er M

onito

ring

for C

alen

dar Y

ear 2

009

(DO

E/R

L‑20

10‑1

1).

BTV

=

back

grou

nd th

resh

old

valu

eN

AR

=

no a

naly

sis r

esul

tSN

C

= sa

mpl

e no

t col

lect

edTO

C

= to

tal o

rgan

ic c

arbo

n



Table B‑45. Results of Shapiro and Francia Test for Normality and Background Threshold Values for the Solid Waste Landfill

Constituenta (unit)

W‑test Statisticb (Log Value)

W‑test Statisticb (Raw Data)

W‑testb Critical Value, Wαc

Upper Tolerance Limit

Background Threshold

Value

Ammonium (as NH3‑) (µg/L) NC NC NC

90d 19.7e WSCF 27.5e STL

90

Chemical oxygen demand (µg/L) NC NC NC 10,000f 10,000

Chloride (µg/L) 0.954 s 0.962 s 0.963 7,820d 7,820Coliform bacteria (colonies/100 mL) NC NC NC 1f 1

Field pH 0.988 ns NA 0.963 [6.68, 7.84]g [6.68, 7.84]

Iron, dissolved (µg/L) 0.960 s 0.802 s 0.962160d

174e WSCF 129e STL

174

Manganese, dissolved (µg/L) NC NC NC10d

27.5e WSCF 15.1e STL

27.5

Nitrate (as NO3‑) (µg/L) 0.833 s 0.844 s 0.963 29,000d 29,000

Nitrite (as NO2‑) (µg/L) NC NC NC 165e WSCF

14e STL 165

Specific conductance (µS/cm) 0.978 ns NA 0.960 583g 583Sulfate (µg/L) 0.983 ns NA 0.963 47,200g 47,200Temperature (degrees C) 0.953 s 0.961 s 0.963 20.7d 20.7

Total organic carbon (µg/L) NC NC NC 842d 210e 842

Zinc, dissolved (µg/L) NC NC NC42.3d

18.3e WSCF 32.1e STL

42.3

a. Constituents are specified in WAC 173‑304‑490(2)(d). Data collected from March 1993 to May 2000 from upgradient wells 699‑24‑35 and 699‑26‑35A.

b. From “Approximate Analysis of Variance Test for Normality,” in Journal of the American Statistical Association (Shapiro and Francia, 1972).

c. Obtained from Table A‑9 in “How to Test Normality and Other Distributional Assumptions,” in ASQC Basic References in Quality Control: Statistical Techniques (Shapiro, 1980) for α = 5%.

d. Maximum value reported.

e. Based on limit of quantitation determined from field blanks (for total organic carbon) or laboratory blanks.

f. Based on laboratory lowest detected result.

g. Based on log‑normal distribution.

NA = not applicable

NC = not calculated; insufficient measured values

ns = not significant at 0.05 level of significance

s = significant at 0.05 level of significance

STL = Severn Trent Laboratories (St. Louis)

WSCF = Waste Sampling and Characterization Facility



Figure B‑1. RCRA Units on the Hanford Site Requiring Groundwater Monitoring

LLWMA 1

WMA B-BX-BY SST

LLWMA 2

LERF 216-B-3 Pond

216-A-29 Ditch

216-A-37-1 Crib

WMA-C SST

WMA-A-AX SST

IDF

200-East Area

216-S-10 Pond and Ditch

LLWMA 3 WMA T SST

WMA TX-TY SST

LLWMA 4WMA U SST

WMA S-SX SST

200-West Area

1325-N LWDF

100-N Area

183-H Solar Evaporation Basins100-H Area

316-5 ProcessTrenches

300 Area

Solid Waste Landfill

NRDWL

1325-N LWDF1301-N LWDF 183-H SolarEvaporation Basins

100-H Area

1324-N/NA Facilities

100-N Area

Not to Scale

IDF Integrated Disposal FacilityLERF Liquid Effluent Retention FacilityLLWMA Low-Level Waste Management AreaLWDF Liquid Disposal FacilityNRDWL Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill

SALDS State-Approved Land Disposal SiteSST Single-Shell TankSWL Solid Waste LandfillWMA Waste Management Area £

216-A-10 Crib

216-A-36B Crib

216-B-36 Trench

gwf10441



Figure B‑2. Groundwater Monitoring Wells for 100‑N Area RCRA Sites

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Co

l um

bi a

Ri v

er

120-N-1 Percolation Pond

116-N-1LWDF

116-N-3LWDF

120-N-2Surface Impoundment

N-2

N-3

N-165

N-71

N-57

N-77

N-34

N-81

N-72

N-28

N-41

N-74

N-32

N-105A

N-73

! RCRA Monitoring Well

Well prefix '199-' omitted

Waste Site

Facility

Former Operational Area

Groundwater Operable Unit

£0 500 1,000 ft

0 100 200 300 m

gwf10442



Figure B‑3. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 116‑H‑6 Evaporation Basins

H

H

!!

Co l u m

b i a Ri v e r

116-H-6 SolarEvaporation Basins

HR-3Process

HXTransfer

HXProcess

H4-8

H4-3H4-12A

H4-12C


H RCRA Monitoring Well and Extraction Well

Pump and Treat Building

Waste Site

Former Operational Area£0 150 300 450 m

0 500 1,000 1,500 ft gwf10443



Figure B‑4. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑A‑29 Ditch, PUREX Cribs, and Waste Management Areas A‑AX and C

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

E17-19

216-A-45Crib

216-A-10Crib

216-A-38-1Crib

216-A-36BCrib 216-A-30

Crib

216-A-37-2Crib

216-A-8 Crib

216-A-24 Ditch216-A-29 Ditch

WMA A-AX

WMA C

216-A-37-1Crib

216-B-3Pond

E27-155E27-24

E27-25

699-43-45

E25-28

E25-26E25-35

E25-34

E26-13

E26-12

E25-48

E25-32PE25-2E25-94

E24-33

E24-20

E25-40

E25-41E24-22

E25-93E25-236

E17-1

E24-18

E17-16

E17-14

E25-17

699-37-47A

E25-19

E17-18

E25-31

E24-16

E27-7

E27-4

E27-12

E27-22

E27-14E27-23

E27-21

E27-13

E27-15

gwf10444

! A-29 Monitoring Well! A-AX Monitoring Well! PUREX Cribs Monitoring Well ! WMA C Monitoring Well!( Other Monitoring Well Decommissioned Well

Waste SiteFacilityFormer Operational Area

Well prefix '299-' omitted0 0.25 0.5 km

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 mi £



Figure B‑5. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑B‑3 Pond and 200 Areas Treated Effluent Disposal Facility

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!

!

!

!

!

216-A-29Ditch

216-B-3-3 Ditch 216-B-3Pond 216-B-3A

Pond216-B-3B

Pond

200 AreasTEDF

42-42B

43-44

43-45

44-39B

299-E26-11

39-39

41-42

41-40

42-40A

42-40C

42-39A42-39B

41-35

40-36

42-37

216-B-3CPond

216-A-30 Crib216-A-37-2 Crib

gwf10445

! B Pond Monitoring Well!( TEDF Monitoring Well!( Other Monitoring Well


Waste SiteFormer Operational AreaBasalt Above Water Table £

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 mi

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 km



Figure B‑6. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑S‑10 Pond and Ditch

`

!

!

!

!

!

216-S-16 Ditch

216-S-11 Pond

216-S-10 Pond

216-S-10

Ditch

216-S

-5

216-S-6

W27-2

32-76

33-75

33-76

W26-14

W26-13

200 West Area

gwf10446


` Deep RCRA Monitoring Well

Well prefix '299-' or '699-' omitted

Waste Site


0 200 400 600 800 1,000 ft

0 100 200 300 m £



Figure B‑7. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 316‑5 Process Trenches

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

Co

l um

bi a

Ri v

er

618-4 Burial Ground

618-5 Burial Ground

316-2NorthProcessPond

316-1SouthProcessPond

618-1BurialGround

618-2BurialGround

316-5 ProcessTrenches

316-3 Trench

1-18A1-18B

1-17B

1-10B

1-16B

1-10A

1-16A1-17A



Waste Site

Facility


£

gwf104470 200 400 600 ft

0 100 200 m



Figure B‑8. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Integrated Disposal Facility

!

!

!

!

!

!

IntegratedDisposalFacility

200 East

E18-1

E17-25

E24-21

E17-23

E24-24

E17-26

! RCRA Monitoring WellWell prefix '299-' omitted

Former Operational AreaWaste SiteFacility £

gwf10448

0 75 150 225 m

0 250 500 750 ft



Figure B‑9. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Liquid Effluent Retention Facility

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!

!

!

!

LERF

216-B-3-3 Ditch

216-A-29Ditch

E26-77

E26-79

699-43-45

E27-7

E27-14

E26-12

E26-10

E26-13

E27-22

E26-11


!( Other Monitoring Well


Waste Site


Basalt Above Water Table

£0 500 1,000 ft

0 100 200 300 m

gwf10449



Figure B‑10. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Low‑Level Waste Management Area 1

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

LLWMA 1

E32-6

E32-5

E32-2

E32-7

E32-4

E32-9

E32-3

E32-8

E28-26

E28-27

E33-28

E28-28

E33-30

E33-21

E33-265

E33-29

E32-10

E33-35

E33-34

E33-266

£0 250 500 750 ft

0 75 150 225 m

gwf10450



Waste Site




Figure B‑11. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 216‑B‑63 Trench and Low‑Level Waste Management Area 2

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!(

(

(

(

(

LLWMA 2

E34-9

E34-2

E27-10

E34-12

E27-9

E34-8

E27-8

E34-10

E33-37

E27-19

E33-36

E33-33

E27-18

E27-16

E27-17

E27-11

£ 0 500 1,000 ft

0 100 200 300 m

gwf10451

( LLWMA 2 and B-63 Monitoring Wells

! LLWMA 2 Monitoring Well

! B-63 Monitoring Well

!( Other Monitoring Well

Decommissioned Well


Waste Site

Facility






!

!

!

!

LLWMA 3

LLWMA 5

WMA T

216-T-32 Crib

216-T-7 Crib

WMA TX-TY

216-T-36 Crib

SALDS(616-A Crib)

W7-4

W10-29

W10-31

W10-30



Waste Site


£0 500 1,000 ft

0 100 200 300 m

gwf10452




\

\

\!

!

!

!

!

!

!

LLWMA-4

W15-30

W15-94

W15-15

W18-23

W18-22

W15-83

W15-17

W18-21

W15-224

W15-152


\ Dry Well


Waste Site


£

0 500 1,000 ft

0 100 200 300 m

gwf10453



Figure B‑14. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill and Solid Waste Landfill

`

`

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

NRDWL

Solid WasteLandfill

25-33A

26-33

26-34A

25-34B

26-35C26-34B26-35A

25-34A

25-34D

24-33

24-34C

22-35

24-35

24-34B

23-34A

23-34B

24-34A

! Monitoring Well Completed atTop of Unconfined

` Monitoring Well Completedin Upper Ringold Unit


Waste Site

£0 500 1,000 ft

0 100 200 300 m

gwf10454



Figure B‑15. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Waste Management Area B‑BX‑BY

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!

!

!!

!

!

BY Cribs

B-8 Crib and Tile Field

WMA BY

WMA BX WMA B

B-7 A & B CribsE33-18,344,345

E33-9

E33-7

E28-8

E33-17E33-44

E33-43

E33-49

E33-39

E33-16

E33-21

E33-31

E33-48

E33-47

E33-32

E33-38

E33-26

E33-42

E33-41

E33-15

E33-20

E33-334

E33-337

E33-338E33-335 E33-339

E33-40

E33-341

E33-5

E33-342

E33-1A

E33-2

E33-3

E33-4

E33-340

E33-12

E33-50E33-13

E33-14

E33-33

E33-36

E33-37

E33-343

gwf10455


!( Other Well Sampled CY 2006 - 2010


Waste Site


Basalt Above Water Table£

0 60 120 180 m

0 200 400 600 ft



Figure B‑16. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Waste Management Areas S‑SX and U

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

LLWMA 4

U Pond

WMA U

WMA SY

WMA S-SX

216-S-25 Crib

216-S-7 Crib

216-S-13 Crib

216-S-9 Crib

216-S-23 Crib

216-U-1,2Cribs

W19-44

W18-30

W22-47

W19-41

W18-31

W22-82

W22-48

W19-47

W22-44

W22-49

W18-40

W22-45

W23-19

W23-15W22-83

W23-21

W22-80

W22-84

W22-85

W22-72

W22-69

W19-45

W22-86

W19-12

W23-20

W22-81

W22-50

W19-42



Waste Site

Facility


£

0 500 1,000 ft

0 100 200 300 m

gwf10456



Figure B‑17. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at Waste Management Areas T and TX‑TY

H

H

H

H

H

H

H H

H

H

H

H

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

WMA T

WMA TY

WMA TX

W10-32

W15-34

W15-44

W10-8

W10-1

W10-4

W14-6

W14-18

W11-40

W10-26

W10-27

W14-14

W11-41 W11-7

W14-19

W14-15

W11-39

W14-16

W14-17

W10-22

W14-11

W15-41

W10-23

W11-47

W11-12

W10-28

W14-13

W11-42

W15-763

W10-24

W15-7W15-1

W15-35

W15-40W15-43

W15-45

W11-46

W15-11

W11-45

W15-765

W15-225


H Extraction Well

Decommissioned Well


Waste Site

Facility

£0 500 1,000 ft

0 100 200 300 m

gwf10457



Figure B‑18. Non‑RCRA Regulated Units on the Hanford Site Requiring Groundwater Monitoring

TEDF

SolidWasteLandfill

ERDF

100-KArea

KW Basin

KE Basin

200-WestArea

200-EastArea

SALDS

(See Figure gwf10445 for well locations)

Hanford Site Boundary

gwf10458



0 2 4 6 8 mi

0 4 8 12 km

£ERDF -Environmental Restoration Disposal FacilitySALDS -State-Approved Land Disposal SiteTEDF -Treated Effluent Disposal Facility

Columbia River



Figure B‑19. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at 100‑K Basins

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

C o l um b i a

R i ve r

100-K

Crib

(116-K

-1)

100-K

Tren

ch

(116-K

-2)

100-K Burial

Ground

(118-K-1)

KE Condensate

Crib (116-KE-1)

KW Condensate

Crib (116-KW-1)

KWDrain Field

(116-KW-1)

KE

Drain Field

(116-KE-3)

K-179

K-178

K-144

107-KW

Retention Basins

107-KE

Retention Basins

K-191

K-187

K-190

K-198K-199

K-200

K-183

K-35

K-138

K-140

K-137K-166

K-132

K-156

K-168

K-165

K-127

K-145

K-141

K-174

K-125A

K-124A

K-120A

K-119A

K-123A

K-139

K-27

K-36

K-31

K-30

K-23

K-20

K-19K-18

K-32B K-32A

K-181

K-173

K-157

K-142

K-175

K-162

K-158

K-125A

K-109A

K-111A

K-110A

K-107AK-106AK-34

K-29

K-11

K-108A

K-123A

! Monitoring Well CY 2006 - 2010

Decommissioned Well

H Extraction Well

H

Injection Well

E Aquifer Tube


Waste Site

Facility


£ 0 500 1,000 ft

0 100 200 300 m

gwf10459



Figure B‑20. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at State‑Approved Land Disposal Site

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

`

`

`

`

!

!!! !

!

!

48-77B

W6-6W7-3W8-1

50-74

49-79

48-71

W6-12 W6-11

51-7551-75P

48-77A

48-77D48-77C

! Tritium Tracking Well(Sampled for Tritium Only)

` SALDS Network Monitoring Well!( Other Monitoring Well

Well prefix '299-' or '699-' omitted

Decommissioned WellWaste Site


0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 ft

0 200 400 600 m£

gwf10460

SALDS

LLWMA 3 LLWMA 5



Figure B‑21. Groundwater Monitoring Wells at the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!

!

!

!

ERDF

38-70

35-70

38-65

36-70B

38-70B 38-70C

38-68A

37-66

36-66B

36-70A

35-66A

36-67

37-68

gwf10461

£! ERDF Network Monitoring Well!( Other Monitoring Well Decommissioned Well

Well prefix '699-' omittedWaste SiteFormer Operational Area

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 mi

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 km

appendix b supporting information for monitored facilities · 2012-07-02 · supporting information...

Documents