-
7/22/2019 Annexure Seniority of Director of Works Accounts
1/12
S.No. Objection Filed by Objection Replies / Remark
1 B.Padmaja
2 Y.Nagaraju
Annexure to Memo No.DWA/HYD/Sn-I/EC-1/2012-13/218 dt:-04- 06-2012
Sarva/Sri
1. The representations vide references 1st to 6th are examined in lightestablished rule position. However, based on the directions of the Honble APA
dt:-31-08-2010 in O.A No.6224/2006 filed by Smt B.Padmaja,DAO(W) Grade-I
Hyderabad have issued batch wise merit list of 1993 and 1994 batches separatel
Sri Md.Arif, DAO(W) and others have filed W.P. No.1166/2010 in the Honble
1. The Obejctions of the
individuals are for bifurcating the
batches of 1993 and 1994 Direct
Recruit DAO(W) Gr-II separetly.
2.Placement of Smt H.Sailaja
3 P.Padmavathy
4 K.Mohan
5 D.Bhagyalatha
6 Md.Arif
AP. The Honble court while admitting the W.P have issued interim directions d
" As status quo. The present plea of the DAO(W) for revision of seniority cann
in view of the interim directions of the Honble High Court of AP dt:-28-01-201
No:1166/2010. However this is subject to outcome of W.P. 2.With regard to
H.Sailaja Rani, she was appointed as DAO(W) Grade-II through APPSC, Hyder
1991 and joined on 21-03-1991 vide G.O.Ms No.73 F&P Dept dt:-07-03-1991.Twho have filed objections referred to above were recruited during 1993.She pro
leave from 24-04-1991 to 28-11-1995 on medical and personal grounds. She rej
1995 and continuing the service. Government vide G.O. Rt No.22 F&P Dept dt:
have treated the leave period from 24-04-1991 to 23-09-1991 as EOL on medica
from 24-04-1991 to 28-11-1995 as DIES NON under FR 18 for all purposes viz
leave and pension. In the instant case the proceeding on EOL on any periods sub
treated as DIES NON will not have any effect on the seniority .This case will no
Rani, DAO(W) Gr-II of 1991
batch is to be decided
-
7/22/2019 Annexure Seniority of Director of Works Accounts
2/12
-
7/22/2019 Annexure Seniority of Director of Works Accounts
3/12
23 A.Venkata Ramana
24 C.Ravichandra Reddy
25 S.Mallikarjuna
26 S.Abdul Munaf
27 A.V.Koteswara Rao
28 D.Kesava Rao
29 T.Upendra Rao
30 V.Krishna Murthy
31 M.Rama Subbaiah
32 Y.Somaiah
33 M.George
34 N.Vivekananda
35 M.Venkateswarulu
36 P.Mallaiah
-
7/22/2019 Annexure Seniority of Director of Works Accounts
4/12
37 V.S.Chandra Sekhar 1) The objection of the
individual is preparation of
Seniority list year wise basedon the Cadre strength and
shall be observed 50% Quota
of the Cadre strength among
D.Rs and Promotees at any
point of time.
1) Annual Panels were drawn basing on the vacancies arose duly earmarking the
and Promotees as per the special Rules.
2) The carry forward SC/ST vacancies were filled with SC/ST qualified candida
promotion as per amended Rule 22(APS&SS) Rules.
SCs/STs who joined after his
date of joining are placed
above his name in Senirotiy
list.
38 P.Surendra Babu Those who did not qualify tilldate in the qualifying test shall
be discharged without any
deviation to Special Rules and
other Orders. Thus, the not
passed candidates shall not
have any place in the Seniority
This has been elaborately dealt with against the objection filed by Sri M.N.A.Anat Sl.No.7 to 36 above . Hence, no further comments.
list, as so many years have
since elapsed after their
recruitment.
-
7/22/2019 Annexure Seniority of Director of Works Accounts
5/12
39 K.Dilli Babu 1) The persons mentioned at
Sl.No.42, 191, 192, 292 to
298, 309, 310, 342, 343, 344,347, 366, 369, 370, 371 and
376 were assigned Seniority
prior to their date of
promotion/date of joining
2) In the Provisional Seniority
1) In pursuance of the orders dated 22-01-2010 in O.A.No.1341 of 2005 and in p
Rule 24(c) of APS&SS Rules, the earlier Panels had to be reviewed. During the
review and revision, persons referred to above had to be given notional date of
Seniority/Promotion.
2) This has been elaborately dealt with against the objection filed by Sri M.N.A.
Others at Sl.No.7 to 36 above . Hence, no further comments.
,
DRs were included viz.,
Sl.No.167, 171, 172, 176, 177,
242, 250, 251, 269, 277, 278,
280, 326, 329 and 331 and
since they did not pass theDepartmental Tests their
names are to be removed.
-
7/22/2019 Annexure Seniority of Director of Works Accounts
6/12
40 Ch.Subramanyam The objection of the individual is
to fix the notional seniority after
Sri Y.Moshey,DAO(W) Gr-II from
the date of passing the test
Certain Direct Recruit DAO(W) Gr-II have filed W.P. No.3253/2007 in the Hon
Court of AP challenging the directions of the Hon'ble APAT dt:-__________ in
no.5469/2004 and also this office Memo No.DWA/Hyd/Sn-I/A1/2006-07/404 d
The Hon'ble High Court while allowing the O.A in favour of Direct Recruit DA
have also issued directions setting aside the orders in O.A No.5469/2004.In view
the request of the individual to place him below Sri Y.Moshey,DAO(W) Gr-II c
considered.41 P.Krishna Mohan Reddy
42 G.Venkateswara Rao
The objections of the individuals
are for reckoning their seniority
from the date of passing the
This point is already answered in respect of S.No.7 to 36 above and the same wi
these persons also
43 G.Narayana
44 V.Sangi Reddy
45 G.V.Ramanaiah
46 M.P.Bade Saheb
47 G.Ramadas
48 M.Subba Narsa Reddy
as well as Direct Recruits
49 D.Sanjeeva Rao
50 P.V.Narasimha Rao
51 L.Lakshmi Narasaiah
-
7/22/2019 Annexure Seniority of Director of Works Accounts
7/12
52 B.D.Kumar Babu
53 K.Ramesh Babu
54 B.Chandra Kumar
55 P.Babu Rao
56 B.Rama Krishna He represented for promotion as
DAO under PH quota
Reservation in promotions for disabled persons is from the panel year 2011-12 o
terms of G.OMS No.42 dt:19-10-2011 of Dept for WCD&Sr.Ctz(DW). The pan
2011-12 is et to be a roved.
The request of these DAO(W) is to
place them in the seniority against
SC/ST carry forward vacancies of
2007-08 panel
It may be stated that these persons did not acquire eligibility, as defined in Rule
APS&SS rules. Therefore the request to include their names in the panel year 20
carry forward vacancies cannot be considered.They acquired eligibility for inclu
names during the panel year 2010-11. This has been done.
57 K.V.Rama Gopal
58 N.Bhasker Rao
59 D.Obulaiah
60 A.Raja Sekhara Reddy
61 L.Nagi Reddy
62 T.Raja Srinivasa Reddy
63 V.Subbaramaiah
The main objections of the
individuals are for reckoning their
seniority from the date of passing the
Division Test both for promotees as
well as Direct Recruits
This point is already answered in respect of S.No.7 to 36 above and the same wi
these persons also
64 L.S.V.B.Narayana
65 D.Sreenivasulu
66 K.Venkataramana
-
7/22/2019 Annexure Seniority of Director of Works Accounts
8/12
-
7/22/2019 Annexure Seniority of Director of Works Accounts
9/12
1) The stand adopted by the
administration is that there is no rota
and quota in the State is gross
violation of the official stand of theGovernment and as such the date of
promotion was adopted as the basis
for Seniority and later the date of
passing the Departmental Test was
also takne as the basis for fixing the
Seniorit .
1) As per the special Rules, Governing the post of DAO(W), 50% of the substan
(not the posts) are to be filled by Direct Recruitment. The remaining shall be fil
methods by promotion and by transfer. The seniority of the DAO(W) shall be re
terms of Rule 33 read with Rule 36 of the General Rules.
76 M.Madhusudhna Rao
decided and number of existing
incumbents and vacancies has to be
arrived at
3) Year wise panels must be prepared
duly earmarking the respective quotas
of DR and promotees
shall be in terms of Rule 6 of General Rules. No. of substantive vacancies arose
panel year shall be the strength of that year. Total Cadre Strength is not relevan
of panels. While preparing the annual panels, the above procedures prescribed i
said Rules was followed.
4) Separate lists must be prepared for
both the streams in their respective
quota and carried forward vacancies
in each stream must be exhibited.
4) There is no such provision in Rule 6 of the General Rules. The combined ann
list consisting of DRs and rank Promotees is to be prepared and published by the
authority in terms of G.O.Ms.No.291, GAD, dated 10-05-1984.
5) If there are any candidates
recruited in excess of their quota the
list of such candidates must be shown
separately duly showing the dates of
their absorption into the seniority list
or their retirement in fortuituous
vacancies.
5) There is no such Rule or Instructions issued by the Government on such of th
appointed/promoted temporarily against DR vacancies shall not have probationa
mentioned in Government Cir.Memo.No.16/SER-A/93-99, GAD, dated 21-04-1
-
7/22/2019 Annexure Seniority of Director of Works Accounts
10/12
6) The provisional list fails to
ascertain the cadre strength and tries
to take shelter under the plea that
records are not available.
6) Seniority list shows the names of the persons in the Cadre in terms of Rule 33
of the general Rules and it has no relevant to the cadre strength.
7) The list exhibits the so called year
wise panels. As seen from the panels
it is obvious that the DWA has shown
the estimated vacancies year wise by
a simple arithmetic of showing
double the number of departmental
7) The averments is not correct. According to the Rule 6 of the general Rules, y
are to be prepared with reference to the vacancies.
promotees. He never bothered about
the rule that the unfilled vacancies of
a particular panel year have to be
carried forward. Brought more than
20 number of departmental
candidates above me in additional to
the promotees already placed aboveme illegally.
8) The dates assigned to various
departmental promotees earlier than
their actual date of joining is highly
irregular and gross violation of the
judgements of the Hon'ble APAT and
8) According to the Rule 33 (c) of the general Rules, notional promotion is perm
However, the pay of such of the candidates shall be regulated in terms of FR 26
g our .
9) The list of candidates who are
working without a regular vacancy in
their quota and holding fortutious
appointments must be prepared and
annexed to the list.
9) There are no such orders from the Government to this extent. It is for the departmen
such lists for its appropriate use.
-
7/22/2019 Annexure Seniority of Director of Works Accounts
11/12
77 N.Shyam Babu
78 K.V.Krishna Rao
79 T.Nageswara Rao
80 K.Trivikram
81 K.Vedagiri
82 M.Venkatesh Babu
83 V.Srinivas
The Obejctions of the individuals
are for maintaining the quota both
for direct recruits and promotees
duly preparing the year wise
panels etc..
The representations received vide reference 77 to 98 have been examined. As pe
of the Honble APAT, Hyderabad dt:-22-01-2010 in O.A No.1341/2005 and as p
judgment of the Honble High Court of AP dt:30-04-2010 in W.P. No.3253/200
panels were prepared from 1980-81 onwards based on the records available dulythe quota both for direct recruits and promotees keeping in view of the adhoc ru
G.O.Ms No.607, GAD dt:-06-12-1992. As per the above directions of the Honb
direct recruits were shown in the seniority list of each year in which they reporte
per rules.As per the directions of the Hon'ble Courts the relevant rules i.e Rule 3
proviso to Rule 33(b) of APS&SS Rules were followed in respect of direct recru
panels are to be prepared to accord promotion to the category of DAO(W) from . .
85 D.Srinivasa Reddy
86 S.Sreenadha Rao
87 Smt C.Neeraja
88 P.Premananda Rao
89 S.Ramachandram
90 Md.Imtiaz
91 I.Sundaraiah
92 I.Vishnudattaraya
93 R.V.Rama Gopal
94 D.Mallikarjuna
.
panels.Hence the representations of Direct Recruits to show their names in the r
panels is not as per rules.
. r nat
96 M.Venkataramana
97 Smt G.Katyayani
98 V.Venkataramana
-
7/22/2019 Annexure Seniority of Director of Works Accounts
12/12
99 Y.Bhaskaramma The objection of the individual is to
alter her date of birth as 31-10-1959
instead 31-10-1957
Smt Y.Bhaskaramma represented vide reference 99, that her date of birth was sh
1957 instead of 31-10-1959 and requested to correct her date of birth.The reque
individual is not relevant to the issue of publication of seniority list of DAO(W)
Sd/-(M.SAMBA MOORTHY)
Director of Works Accounts
A.P. Hyderabad