annexure seniority of director of works accounts

7/22/2019 Annexure Seniority of Director of Works Accounts

1/12

S.No. Objection Filed by Objection Replies / Remark

1 B.Padmaja

2 Y.Nagaraju

Annexure to Memo No.DWA/HYD/Sn-I/EC-1/2012-13/218 dt:-04- 06-2012

Sarva/Sri

1. The representations vide references 1st to 6th are examined in lightestablished rule position. However, based on the directions of the Honble APA

dt:-31-08-2010 in O.A No.6224/2006 filed by Smt B.Padmaja,DAO(W) Grade-I

Hyderabad have issued batch wise merit list of 1993 and 1994 batches separatel

Sri Md.Arif, DAO(W) and others have filed W.P. No.1166/2010 in the Honble

1. The Obejctions of the

individuals are for bifurcating the

batches of 1993 and 1994 Direct

Recruit DAO(W) Gr-II separetly.

2.Placement of Smt H.Sailaja

3 P.Padmavathy

4 K.Mohan

5 D.Bhagyalatha

6 Md.Arif

AP. The Honble court while admitting the W.P have issued interim directions d

" As status quo. The present plea of the DAO(W) for revision of seniority cann

in view of the interim directions of the Honble High Court of AP dt:-28-01-201

No:1166/2010. However this is subject to outcome of W.P. 2.With regard to

H.Sailaja Rani, she was appointed as DAO(W) Grade-II through APPSC, Hyder

1991 and joined on 21-03-1991 vide G.O.Ms No.73 F&P Dept dt:-07-03-1991.Twho have filed objections referred to above were recruited during 1993.She pro

leave from 24-04-1991 to 28-11-1995 on medical and personal grounds. She rej

1995 and continuing the service. Government vide G.O. Rt No.22 F&P Dept dt:

have treated the leave period from 24-04-1991 to 23-09-1991 as EOL on medica

from 24-04-1991 to 28-11-1995 as DIES NON under FR 18 for all purposes viz

leave and pension. In the instant case the proceeding on EOL on any periods sub

treated as DIES NON will not have any effect on the seniority .This case will no

Rani, DAO(W) Gr-II of 1991

batch is to be decided


2/12


3/12

23 A.Venkata Ramana

24 C.Ravichandra Reddy

25 S.Mallikarjuna

26 S.Abdul Munaf

27 A.V.Koteswara Rao

28 D.Kesava Rao

29 T.Upendra Rao

30 V.Krishna Murthy

31 M.Rama Subbaiah

32 Y.Somaiah

33 M.George

34 N.Vivekananda

35 M.Venkateswarulu

36 P.Mallaiah


4/12

37 V.S.Chandra Sekhar 1) The objection of the

individual is preparation of

Seniority list year wise basedon the Cadre strength and

shall be observed 50% Quota

of the Cadre strength among

D.Rs and Promotees at any

point of time.

1) Annual Panels were drawn basing on the vacancies arose duly earmarking the

and Promotees as per the special Rules.

2) The carry forward SC/ST vacancies were filled with SC/ST qualified candida

promotion as per amended Rule 22(APS&SS) Rules.

SCs/STs who joined after his

date of joining are placed

above his name in Senirotiy

list.

38 P.Surendra Babu Those who did not qualify tilldate in the qualifying test shall

be discharged without any

deviation to Special Rules and

other Orders. Thus, the not

passed candidates shall not

have any place in the Seniority

This has been elaborately dealt with against the objection filed by Sri M.N.A.Anat Sl.No.7 to 36 above . Hence, no further comments.

list, as so many years have

since elapsed after their

recruitment.


5/12

39 K.Dilli Babu 1) The persons mentioned at

Sl.No.42, 191, 192, 292 to

298, 309, 310, 342, 343, 344,347, 366, 369, 370, 371 and

376 were assigned Seniority

prior to their date of

promotion/date of joining

2) In the Provisional Seniority

1) In pursuance of the orders dated 22-01-2010 in O.A.No.1341 of 2005 and in p

Rule 24(c) of APS&SS Rules, the earlier Panels had to be reviewed. During the

review and revision, persons referred to above had to be given notional date of

Seniority/Promotion.

2) This has been elaborately dealt with against the objection filed by Sri M.N.A.

Others at Sl.No.7 to 36 above . Hence, no further comments.

,

DRs were included viz.,

Sl.No.167, 171, 172, 176, 177,

242, 250, 251, 269, 277, 278,

280, 326, 329 and 331 and

since they did not pass theDepartmental Tests their

names are to be removed.


6/12

40 Ch.Subramanyam The objection of the individual is

to fix the notional seniority after

Sri Y.Moshey,DAO(W) Gr-II from

the date of passing the test

Certain Direct Recruit DAO(W) Gr-II have filed W.P. No.3253/2007 in the Hon

Court of AP challenging the directions of the Hon'ble APAT dt:-__________ in

no.5469/2004 and also this office Memo No.DWA/Hyd/Sn-I/A1/2006-07/404 d

The Hon'ble High Court while allowing the O.A in favour of Direct Recruit DA

have also issued directions setting aside the orders in O.A No.5469/2004.In view

the request of the individual to place him below Sri Y.Moshey,DAO(W) Gr-II c

considered.41 P.Krishna Mohan Reddy

42 G.Venkateswara Rao

The objections of the individuals

are for reckoning their seniority

from the date of passing the

This point is already answered in respect of S.No.7 to 36 above and the same wi

these persons also

43 G.Narayana

44 V.Sangi Reddy

45 G.V.Ramanaiah

46 M.P.Bade Saheb

47 G.Ramadas

48 M.Subba Narsa Reddy

as well as Direct Recruits

49 D.Sanjeeva Rao

50 P.V.Narasimha Rao

51 L.Lakshmi Narasaiah


7/12

52 B.D.Kumar Babu

53 K.Ramesh Babu

54 B.Chandra Kumar

55 P.Babu Rao

56 B.Rama Krishna He represented for promotion as

DAO under PH quota

Reservation in promotions for disabled persons is from the panel year 2011-12 o

terms of G.OMS No.42 dt:19-10-2011 of Dept for WCD&Sr.Ctz(DW). The pan

2011-12 is et to be a roved.

The request of these DAO(W) is to

place them in the seniority against

SC/ST carry forward vacancies of

2007-08 panel

It may be stated that these persons did not acquire eligibility, as defined in Rule

APS&SS rules. Therefore the request to include their names in the panel year 20

carry forward vacancies cannot be considered.They acquired eligibility for inclu

names during the panel year 2010-11. This has been done.

57 K.V.Rama Gopal

58 N.Bhasker Rao

59 D.Obulaiah

60 A.Raja Sekhara Reddy

61 L.Nagi Reddy

62 T.Raja Srinivasa Reddy

63 V.Subbaramaiah

The main objections of the

individuals are for reckoning their

seniority from the date of passing the

Division Test both for promotees as

well as Direct Recruits

This point is already answered in respect of S.No.7 to 36 above and the same wi

these persons also

64 L.S.V.B.Narayana

65 D.Sreenivasulu

66 K.Venkataramana


8/12


9/12

1) The stand adopted by the

administration is that there is no rota

and quota in the State is gross

violation of the official stand of theGovernment and as such the date of

promotion was adopted as the basis

for Seniority and later the date of

passing the Departmental Test was

also takne as the basis for fixing the

Seniorit .

1) As per the special Rules, Governing the post of DAO(W), 50% of the substan

(not the posts) are to be filled by Direct Recruitment. The remaining shall be fil

methods by promotion and by transfer. The seniority of the DAO(W) shall be re

terms of Rule 33 read with Rule 36 of the General Rules.

76 M.Madhusudhna Rao

decided and number of existing

incumbents and vacancies has to be

arrived at

3) Year wise panels must be prepared

duly earmarking the respective quotas

of DR and promotees

shall be in terms of Rule 6 of General Rules. No. of substantive vacancies arose

panel year shall be the strength of that year. Total Cadre Strength is not relevan

of panels. While preparing the annual panels, the above procedures prescribed i

said Rules was followed.

4) Separate lists must be prepared for

both the streams in their respective

quota and carried forward vacancies

in each stream must be exhibited.

4) There is no such provision in Rule 6 of the General Rules. The combined ann

list consisting of DRs and rank Promotees is to be prepared and published by the

authority in terms of G.O.Ms.No.291, GAD, dated 10-05-1984.

5) If there are any candidates

recruited in excess of their quota the

list of such candidates must be shown

separately duly showing the dates of

their absorption into the seniority list

or their retirement in fortuituous

vacancies.

5) There is no such Rule or Instructions issued by the Government on such of th

appointed/promoted temporarily against DR vacancies shall not have probationa

mentioned in Government Cir.Memo.No.16/SER-A/93-99, GAD, dated 21-04-1


10/12

6) The provisional list fails to

ascertain the cadre strength and tries

to take shelter under the plea that

records are not available.

6) Seniority list shows the names of the persons in the Cadre in terms of Rule 33

of the general Rules and it has no relevant to the cadre strength.

7) The list exhibits the so called year

wise panels. As seen from the panels

it is obvious that the DWA has shown

the estimated vacancies year wise by

a simple arithmetic of showing

double the number of departmental

7) The averments is not correct. According to the Rule 6 of the general Rules, y

are to be prepared with reference to the vacancies.

promotees. He never bothered about

the rule that the unfilled vacancies of

a particular panel year have to be

carried forward. Brought more than

20 number of departmental

candidates above me in additional to

the promotees already placed aboveme illegally.

8) The dates assigned to various

departmental promotees earlier than

their actual date of joining is highly

irregular and gross violation of the

judgements of the Hon'ble APAT and

8) According to the Rule 33 (c) of the general Rules, notional promotion is perm

However, the pay of such of the candidates shall be regulated in terms of FR 26

g our .

9) The list of candidates who are

working without a regular vacancy in

their quota and holding fortutious

appointments must be prepared and

annexed to the list.

9) There are no such orders from the Government to this extent. It is for the departmen

such lists for its appropriate use.


11/12

77 N.Shyam Babu

78 K.V.Krishna Rao

79 T.Nageswara Rao

80 K.Trivikram

81 K.Vedagiri

82 M.Venkatesh Babu

83 V.Srinivas

The Obejctions of the individuals

are for maintaining the quota both

for direct recruits and promotees

duly preparing the year wise

panels etc..

The representations received vide reference 77 to 98 have been examined. As pe

of the Honble APAT, Hyderabad dt:-22-01-2010 in O.A No.1341/2005 and as p

judgment of the Honble High Court of AP dt:30-04-2010 in W.P. No.3253/200

panels were prepared from 1980-81 onwards based on the records available dulythe quota both for direct recruits and promotees keeping in view of the adhoc ru

G.O.Ms No.607, GAD dt:-06-12-1992. As per the above directions of the Honb

direct recruits were shown in the seniority list of each year in which they reporte

per rules.As per the directions of the Hon'ble Courts the relevant rules i.e Rule 3

proviso to Rule 33(b) of APS&SS Rules were followed in respect of direct recru

panels are to be prepared to accord promotion to the category of DAO(W) from . .

85 D.Srinivasa Reddy

86 S.Sreenadha Rao

87 Smt C.Neeraja

88 P.Premananda Rao

89 S.Ramachandram

90 Md.Imtiaz

91 I.Sundaraiah

92 I.Vishnudattaraya

93 R.V.Rama Gopal

94 D.Mallikarjuna

.

panels.Hence the representations of Direct Recruits to show their names in the r

panels is not as per rules.

. r nat

96 M.Venkataramana

97 Smt G.Katyayani

98 V.Venkataramana


12/12

99 Y.Bhaskaramma The objection of the individual is to

alter her date of birth as 31-10-1959

instead 31-10-1957

Smt Y.Bhaskaramma represented vide reference 99, that her date of birth was sh

1957 instead of 31-10-1959 and requested to correct her date of birth.The reque

individual is not relevant to the issue of publication of seniority list of DAO(W)

Sd/-(M.SAMBA MOORTHY)

Director of Works Accounts

A.P. Hyderabad

annexure seniority of director of works accounts

Documents