doing more with oa repositories
DESCRIPTION
Presented at TICER Summer School, Tilburg University, August 2007TRANSCRIPT
Doing More with Open Access Repositories:
Recent and Developing Services
John MacCollHead, Digital Library
University of EdinburghScotland, UK
Presentation
1 Introduction2 Multi-Venue Publication3 Semantic Enrichment4 Legal Enrichment5 Text-Mining6 Services to Academic Authors: the
Depot7 Overlay Journals
Presentation8 Ranked Research Output Services9 Open Access and Research
Assessment10 Aggregated ETD Services11 Data Linkage12 Federated Search13 Preservation14 Conclusion
The battle for content
UK IR league table, April 2006
ETDs going strong
SHERPA steering the UK
Gold & green
Publishing simplification tools
Open Access publishing: financial support
UK PubMed Central
BioMed Central journals
PLOS journals
UK PMC workflow
PMC DTD
Freely available
Science Commons
Publication policy
Scholar's Copyright Addendum Engine
Neurocommons
The Depot
Overlay Journals: a chimera?
Overlay journals: developing architecture
Source: Van de Sompel, H [et al] 'An interoperable fabric for scholarly value chains' D-Lib Magazine 12 (10) October 2006
Dutch Cream of Science
Ranked research output services
Geographical Services
Disciplinary Services
Geographical by Discipline
Disciplinary by Geography
Set of all institutional repositories
Faculty of 1000
Research Assessment Exercise
'Purity' of Open Access institutional repositories
Edinburgh a aGlasgow a a aSouthampton a aOxford a aWhite Rose a aUCL a aBirmingham a a
Metadata record
Full-text referent for each metadata record
Guaranteed active link to referent
Dependent link to referent
Full-text digitisation request option
Aggregated ETD services
Source: Wells, Andrew. The Australian perspective: innovation and stewardship in building a key national research repository - the Australian Digital Theses Program. Presentation at ETD 2005, University of New South Wales
CLADDIER
StORe
MRC Data Sharing and Preservation Initiative
Deconstructed peer review?
• Read paper within IR• Consult data within its repository• Review not complete until both have been checked and assessed• 'Formal' publication becomes dependent on informal
Federated search
Federated search
Preservation
Conclusions
• Complementarity of formal and informal scholarly publishing systems• Emergence of new business models• Cost-neutral shift to a more efficient system• New tools will continue to appear based on well-formed data – including 'literature as data'• Our current task is to clear the ground
Thank you