does environmental impact assessment facilitate environmental management activities?
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
1/17
1
Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management
Vol. 2, No. 1 (March 2000) pp. 1–17
© Imperial College Press
DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
TRACEY NITZ
School of Environmental Planning
Griffith University, Nathan QLD Australia 4111
E-mail: [email protected]
IAN HOLLAND
Key Centre for Ethics Law Justice and Governance
Griffith University, Nathan QLD Australia 4111
E-mail: [email protected]
The aim of environmental impact assessment (EIA) is to ensure effective environmental
management outcomes for development projects. Some argue it has failed to achieve this,because environmental management activities are not properly planned in the EIA process.
The extent of this problem is largely unknown, due to a lack of empirical evidence.
This paper presents the results of research investigating environmental management
planning within EIA in the state of Queensland, Australia. The study examined environmental
management commitments within 285 environmental impact statements (EISs).
The majority of the EISs contained environmental monitoring and mitigation
commitments and more than half identified corrective actions. This suggests that EIA
facilitated environmental management within some developments. Nevertheless, many
environmental management activities were not addressed in EISs, even when specifically
requested.Trends in environmental management planning over time revealed dramatic
improvements. These appeared to have resulted from an increase in government requirements
for, and the provision of guidelines to assist, environmental management planning. These
findings suggest improved environmental management must be facilitated by government
agencies, rather than relying upon industry innovation.
Keywords: environmental management, environmental impact assessment, environmental
management plan, empirical analysis
Using Environmental Impact Assessment to Plan forEnvironmental Management
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is one of the major tools relied upon
by governments and societies worldwide to achieve environmental management.
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H
N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
2/17
2 T. Nitz & I. Holland
It is primarily used to assist them in the identification, prediction and mitigation
of the environmental impacts of their activities (Dipper et al., 1998; Sadler,
1996; EPA, 1996).There is general agreement that EIA has led to improvements in the environmental
management of development activities (EPA, 1996; McDonald & Brown, 1995;
Bailey, 1997). However, the development of EIA theory and practice has been
accompanied by the accumulation of a significant body of literature identifying
numerous weaknesses in EIA processes and practice. These include criticisms
of the timing of the EIA process relative to project planning and design and
the poor scientific quality of many EIA studies (James, 1995; McDonald &
Brown, 1995; Buckley, 1989; Fairweather, 1989). EIA processes are also criticised
for allowing inadequate public involvement, inconsistently requiring EIA
procedures, facilitating a view of EIA as a reactive planning tool and numerous
other weaknesses (Leu et al., 1996; James, 1995; Brown & Hill, 1995; Buckley,
1989).
The absence of “follow-up” environmental management activities within most
jurisdictions is often identified as the most critical weakness of EIA practice
(Dipper et al., 1998; Sadler, 1996; Buckley, 1989; Ortolano & Shepherd, 1995;
Bisset & Tomlinson, 1988; Buckley, 1989; EPA, 1996). Follow-up environmental
management activities include tasks such as mitigation, monitoring, reportingand auditing of the environmental impacts of development. These activities,
undertaken by both project proponents and government agencies, are conducted
after a development proposal is approved.
The recognition of problems within EIA practice have led to numerous studies
providing suggestions for improvement, including an international study of the
effectiveness of environmental assessment (Sadler, 1996). That study identified
strengthening follow-up environmental management activities as one of the major
priorities for improving EIA effectiveness. Ultimately, improving environmentalmanagement within EIA will help ensure more environmentally acceptable
development outcomes (Sadler, 1996; Hickie & Wade, 1997).
This paper, therefore, focuses on the environmental management activities
within EIA. As perhaps the most widely adopted and accepted environmental
management tool, it is particularly instructive to examine the environmental
management outcomes of EIA. Within EIA, there is also a range of factors
which may influence environmental management activities. In particular,
environmental management activities can be influenced by
• Design changes in the pre-decision stage of EIA
• Environmental management commitments within EISs
• Environmental management conditions on project approval
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
3/17
Does Environmental Impact Assessment Facilitate Environmental Management Activities? 3
• Environmental management activities implemented in the operational
development
•
Enforcement of approval conditions by government agencies in the operationaldevelopment
Arguably, the first step in improving environmental management activities
is to get project proponents to identify project environmental management strategies
during the planning and approvals process, i.e. the pre-decision stage (Bailey,
1997; Brown & Hill, 1995). This paper explores this aspect of follow-up
environmental management.
The Research Project
During the 1990s there were two main Queensland Acts requiring EIA, the
State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971 and the Local
Government (Planning and Environment ) Act 1991–1998 [LG(P&E) Act]. As
the majority of EIAs were conducted under the LG (P&E ) Act , this paper reports
analysis of only those prepared under that Act. Under the LG (P&E ) Act government
prepares the terms of reference (TOR) for an EIA, and proponents prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS) under the guidance of this TOR.This study examined whether TOR for EIA in Queensland have requested
follow-up environmental management activities as an integral element of EIS
preparation, and whether proponents have responded to those requests. Through
this analysis we aim to add to the currently limited research on the extent of
follow-up activities within EIA systems.
The research project examined environmental management commitments made
within 285 EISs. This paper reports the nature of government requests for follow-
up commitments in the TOR for the EISs. These requests are then compared
with those follow-up commitments within the EISs. Trends in environmental
management commitments over time are identified and explained. The paper
concludes with a discussion of the implications of these results for the use of
EIA in enhancing follow-up environmental management activities.
The Study Methodology
This study was based on empirical analysis of the EIA process leading up to
the point of project approval. The study examined all EISs prepared in Queenslandunder the LG (P&E ) Act for the period 1990 to 1998 for which complete documents
were available from Queensland Government Departments. A total of 285 TORs
and EISs were obtained for review. Each TOR and EIS was read and the nature
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
4/17
4 T. Nitz & I. Holland
of environmental management commitments recorded using a standard data sheet.
The data sheet was used to record the presence of requests for environmental
management commitments in TORs, and the presence and degree of detail of those provided in EISs (see also Amir & Mosseri, 1997). A total of 20 parameters
were recorded for each project TOR and 14 parameters for each EIS.
There is a wide range of follow-up environmental management activities that
can be undertaken. A review of the environmental assessment literature was
used to define the range of activities investigated in this study (see, for example,
Horberry, 1996; Au & Sanvicens, 1996; BCC, 1996; Brew & Lee, 1996). The
resultant list of activities ranged from the development of performance indicators
to the use of external reporting, and are identified and defined below:
Activities, undertaken by proponents and
regulators, such as mitigation, monitoring,
reporting and auditing of the environmental
impacts of development
Management measures to reduce environmental
impacts to acceptable levels (BCC, 1996)
Aims of the monitoring and management
procedures (Bisset & Tomlinson, 1988)Strategies to monitor important features of the
environment to identify environmental impacts
of the development (Wood, 1994)
Criteria which specify the acceptable level of
impact, against which the results of monitoring
can be compared (e.g., legislated standards or
government policy) (EPA, 1996)
Strategies for monitoring environmental
conditions to identify any impacts not predicted
in the EIS (Sanvicens & Baldwin, 1996)
Strategies for monitoring environmental
conditions to identify any differences between
the actual impacts of development and those
predicted in the EIS (Sanvicens & Baldwin,
1996)
Measures to respond to monitoring results which
show unacceptable impact levels (EPA, 1996;BCC, 1996)
Strategies to report on the effectiveness of
mitigation measures and results of monitoring
• Follow-up environmental
management activities
• Mitigation
• Objectives
• Monitoring
• Performance indicators
• Strategies to identify
unpredicted impacts
• Strategies to identify
differences between
actual and predicted
impacts
• Corrective actions
• Internal reporting
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
5/17
Does Environmental Impact Assessment Facilitate Environmental Management Activities? 5
Having gathered this data, we then examined patterns in the requests for,
and adoption of, follow-up environmental management commitments in the TORs
and EISs overall, as well as over time. Non-parametric statistical tests were
used to identify significant trends and differences.1
Study Results
This section of the paper identifies the follow-up environmental management
commitments that were included in the EISs assessed in this study. The content
of EISs in Queensland is also closely related to their terms of reference (TOR),
hence the frequencies of requests for each of the environmental management
activities in the TOR are also presented (Moon, 1998).
Did the Terms of Reference request EIA follow-up activities?
The TOR for the EISs examined in this study were assessed, to identify how
frequently each follow-up activity was requested. Figure 1 shows the frequency
of requests for each follow-up activity in the TOR.
•
External reporting
• Identify responsible
persons
• Management review
within the proponent’s organisation (Au &
Sanvicens, 1996)
Strategies to report on the effectiveness of mitigation measures and results of monitoring
outside the proponent’s organisation (Wood,
1994; Bisset & Tomlinson, 1988)
Allocate responsibility for implementation of
environmental management activities (Au &
Sanvicens, 1996; BCC, 1996)
Strategies for reviewing environmental man-
agement activities in the light of monitoring
and other results (Au & Sanvicens, 1996)
1Contingency table analysis was performed to identify relationships between the variables of interest,
using the SAS statistical package. For the categorical and nominal variables, the log-likelihood ratio
(G2) was used to test whether an association exists between the contingency table variables. This ratio
was used in preference to the traditionally favoured chi-square test of goodness of fit, because it is
more accurate where there are small expected cell frequencies, as is the case in this study (Zar, 1996).The analysis of ordinal variables used the gamma value, which provides a measure of the strength of
association between contingency table variables. This statistic was used because it is more powerful
for detecting positive or negative trends in variables than the chi-square statistic, which ignores the
ordering of variables (Agresti and Finlay, 1997).
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
6/17
6 T. Nitz & I. Holland
Figure 1 indicates that the following environmental management activities
were requested in more than half of the TORs:
(i) Mitigation strategies;
(ii) Monitoring strategies;
(iii) Corrective actions;
(iv) Internal reporting strategies;
(v) Identification of responsible persons;
(vi) Identification of unpredicted impacts; and
(vii) Identification of differences between actual and predicted impacts.
Figure 1 reveals that mitigation and monitoring strategies were requestedin 90 per cent of the TOR. This suggests that the Queensland government agencies
considered these follow-up activities important. Nevertheless, given that the primary
aim of undertaking an EIA is to ensure effective environmental management,
it is a concern that mitigation strategies were not requested in all of the TOR.
Even fewer TOR (84 per cent) required the proponent to identify corrective
actions for any unacceptable impacts identified. Furthermore, only 32 per cent
of the TOR requested the proponent to identify the standards according to which
the acceptability of impacts would be determined. Given that past studies (Horberry,
1996; Au & Sanvicens, 1996; Bisset & Tomlinson, 1988) have identified the
need for performance indicators and corrective actions to ensure effective
environmental management, the absence of requests for these follow-up activities
is likely to weaken the effectiveness of project environmental management.
Fig. 1. TOR requests for follow-up commitments.
n = 285
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
M i t i g a t i o n
M
o n i t o r i n g
P e r f o r m a n c e i n d i c a t o r s
C o r r e c t i v e a c t i o n s
O
b j e c t i v e s
I d e n t i f y r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s
I n t e r n a l r e p o r t i n g
E x t e r n a l R e p o r t i n g R e v i e w
I d e n t i f y u n p r e d i c t e d
I d e n t i f y d i f f e r e n c e s
% T
O R r e q u e s t e d
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
7/17
Does Environmental Impact Assessment Facilitate Environmental Management Activities? 7
It is also interesting to note that while strategies for reporting monitoring
results within the development management structure (variable name — internal
reporting) were requested in 88 per cent of the TOR, reporting these resultsto external bodies such as regulatory agencies was requested in only 12 per
cent of these TOR. This suggests that the focus of government agencies preparing
the TOR was on ensuring environmental management occurred within the
development, rather than on ensuring compliance and providing feedback on
the accuracy of EIA predictions by reporting to external agencies.
Figure 1 also indicates that follow-up review strategies were requested in
16 per cent of the TOR. The absence of requests for follow-up review strategies
from the majority of the TORs is also of concern, as the continual review of
environmental management activities in light of monitoring results is essential
to ensuring their continued effectiveness (Horberry, 1996; Sadler, 1996; Morrison-
Saunders, 1996).
Did proponents include EIA follow-up commitments in the EISs?
The frequency of TOR requests for EIA follow-up commitments can be compared
with the actual commitments within the EISs. The EISs were assessed according
to a scoring system, adapted from a system used by Amir and Mosseri (1997),which reflected the level of detail in which the commitments were provided
and whether they had been requested in the TOR. The frequency and level
of detail of commitments for each environmental management activity in the
EISs examined in this study is shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Nature of follow-up commitments in EISs.
n = 285
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
M i t i g a t i o n s t r a t e g i e s
M o n i t o r i n g s t r a t e g i e s
P e r f o r m a n c
e I n d i c a t o r s
C o r r e c t i v e a c t i o n s
O b j e c t i v e s
I d e n t i f y r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s
I n t e r n a l r e p o r t i n g
E x t e r n a l r e p o r t i n g
R e v i e w
I d e n t i f y u n p r e d i c t e d
I d e n t i f y d i f f e r e n c e s
% o
f E I S s
Provided Partly provided Not provided
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
8/17
8 T. Nitz & I. Holland
Figure 2 indicates that there is considerable room for improvements in
commitments to undertake environmental management activities within the
Queensland EIA process. Of the 11 follow-up activities examined, only mitigationstrategies were fully provided in more than 50 per cent of the 285 EISs. As
discussed earlier, ensuring effective environmental management is the primary
goal of EIA. Thus this absence of commitments to undertake even the most
basic and fundamental follow-up activities indicates a major weakness in the
Queensland EIA process.
Of the remainder of the follow-up activities, the following were fully provided
in more than one-third of the EISs:
(i) Monitoring strategies;(ii) Objectives;
(iii) Identification of responsible persons; and
(iv) Internal reporting strategies.
Thus, seven important EIA follow-up activities examined in this study were
provided in less than one-third of the EISs.
The results also suggest other deficiencies. Figure 2 indicates that monitoring
strategies were provided in half of the EISs. The performance standards with
which monitored impacts must comply, and the actions to be taken to correct
any unacceptable impacts were provided in less than 30 per cent of the EISs.
This suggests that the effectiveness of any monitoring strategies is compromised
by the potential inability of proponents to actually identify and correct unacceptable
impacts.
This analysis also shows that the potential for improving the predictive capacity
of EIA through follow-up activities is not being utilised. Commitments to identify
differences between EIS predictions and the actual impacts of projects and to
identify any unpredicted impacts were provided in less than 10 per cent of theEISs (Fig. 2). This leaves little opportunity for providing feedback about the
accuracy of the predictive tools used in these EIA studies by undertaking post-
auditing studies, as advocated by Dipper, Jones & Wood (1998).
Figure 2 also indicates that follow-up review strategies were provided in
only 10 per cent of the EISs. This suggests that there was little focus on ensuring
the continued effective management of the environmental impacts of developments.
This confirms that proponents fail to appreciate the benefits of conducting continuous
EIA follow-up activities (Dipperet al
., 1998).One interesting, and perhaps unexpected, result depicted in Fig. 2, is that
the disparity between requests for internal and external reporting strategies in
the TOR is not mirrored in the EISs. The relatively high level of external reporting
strategies in EISs may be a result of some proponents recording in EISs their
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
9/17
Does Environmental Impact Assessment Facilitate Environmental Management Activities? 9
external reporting commitments required under other legislation, for example,
as a condition of an environmental license issued under the Environmental Protection
Act (Queensland) 1994. Alternatively, the willingness of some proponents toinclude internal and external reporting commitments in their EIS, regardless of
whether they were requested in the TOR, may be a reflection of their view
of EIA as a “paper chase to secure a development permit”, rather than a real
commitment to undertake these follow-up activities (Au & Sanvicens, 1996).
On the whole, these results suggest that comprehensive environmental
management commitments were rarely evident within the Queensland EIA process.
However, these results provide an indication of follow-up commitments within
EISs only. As such, the absence of many follow-up commitments from a considerable
proportion of EISs does not necessarily mean effective environmental management
activities were not occurring within operational developments. It does, however,
indicate that the Queensland EIA process was rarely used by proponents to
plan for effective environmental management within their proposed development
nor to improve future EIA practice. This represents a missed opportunity within
the EIA process (Dipper et al., 1998).
Were there any trends in EIA follow-up commitments?
Despite this dismal picture of environmental management activities within the
Queensland EIA process, this study also revealed significant increases in follow-
up commitments over time. Statistical analysis was performed to identify any
trends in the follow-up commitments in the EISs submitted in different years.
This analysis revealed that there were statistically significant increases in the
number and level of detail of follow-up commitments in EISs submitted in later
years. This was the case for all 11 of the follow-up activities examined in
this study.Figures 3–5 show the trends in the provision of performance indicators, external
reporting and follow-up review strategies in the EISs, respectively. As the trends
were similar across the different follow-up activities, to avoid repetition, the
results are depicted for these three activities only. Of the 11 follow-up activities
examined in this study, the most significant increases over time occurred in
the provision of monitoring strategies, corrective actions, performance indicators,
internal reporting strategies and the identification of responsible persons.
Figures 3–5 show that, consistent with the level of provision of follow-up
commitments in all of the EISs, the trends over time differ between the follow-
up activities. While the level of commitments for some follow-up activities increase
gradually over time, such as follow-up review strategies (Fig. 5), others, such
as performance indicators (Fig. 3), increased dramatically at one point in time.
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
10/17
10 T. Nitz & I. Holland
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1991 n=16 1992 n=43 1993 n=50 1994 n=35 1995 n=48 1996 n=41 1997 n=35 1998 n=17
% o
f E I S s
Provided Partly provided Not provided
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1991 n=16 1992 n=43 1993 n=50 1994 n=35 1995 n=48 1996 n=41 1997 n=35 1998 n=17
% o
f E I S s
Provided Partly provided Not provided
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1991 n=16 1992 n=43 1993 n=50 1994 n=35 1995 n=48 1996 n=41 1997 n=35 1998 n=17
% o
f E I S s
Provided Partl provided Not provided
Fig. 3. Provision of performance indicators in EISs over time.
Fig. 4. Provision of external reporting strategies in EISs over time.
Fig. 5. Provision of follow-up review strategies in EISs over time.
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
11/17
Does Environmental Impact Assessment Facilitate Environmental Management Activities? 11
This may suggest that the increases in commitments were a result of different
factors. For example, the dramatic increase in provision of performance indicators
from 1994 to 1995 may have been a result of similar requirements for thisinformation in order to obtain an environmental license under the Environmental
Protection Act (Queensland) 1994.
The results also reflect the willingness of proponents to commit to some
follow-up activities more readily than others. Figures 3 and 4 indicate that the
provision of performance indicators in EISs increased to over 75 per cent of
those submitted in 1998, whereas the provision of external reporting strategies
increased to only 50 per cent of the EISs submitted in 1998. Furthermore, Fig. 4
shows that the provision of follow-up review strategies increased to just under
30 per cent of the EISs submitted in 1997. Thus, while the increase in follow-
up commitments was significant for all of the activities, some activities enjoyed
more significant increases than others.
What are the causes of these trends?
To capitalise on the encouraging trend of increasing environmental management
commitments in EISs in Queensland, and to provide lessons for other jurisdictions,
it is important to identify the factors causing these trends. A number of factorswhich influence the effectiveness of EIA have been identified, such as procedural
control, professional control and the provision of government guidance (Ortolano
et al., 1987; Dipper et al., 1998; Moon, 1998).
Ortolano et al. (1987) and Dipper et al. (1998) both suggest that the
role of governments in EIA processes, i.e. procedural control, influences the
effectiveness of EIA. Dipper et al. (1998) argue that to encourage EIA follow-
up “the possibility of developing mandatory requirements and/or central guidance
for EIA follow-up needs further exploration”. Statistical analysis was performedto investigate the influence of these factors.
Figures 6–8 depict the trends in TOR requests for performance indicators,
external reporting and follow-up review strategies, respectively. As for the trends
in follow-up commitments in EISs, the trends in TOR requests were relatively
consistent amongst the different follow-up activities, consequently, the results
are provided for these three activities only.
These figures indicate that there were considerable increases in TOR requests
for these follow-up commitments between 1990 and 1998. For instance, Fig. 6
reveals an increase in TOR requests for performance indicators from no requests
in 1991 to requests in over 90 per cent of TOR in 1998. Analysis revealed
that there were statistically significant increases over time in requests for all
of the environmental management activities examined, with the exception of
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
12/17
12 T. Nitz & I. Holland
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
8090
100
1991 n=16 1992 n=43 1993 n=50 1994 n=35 1995 n=48 1996 n=41 1997 n=35 1998 n=17
% o
f T O R r e q u e s t i n g p e r f o r m a n
c e
i n d i c a t o r s
0
10
20
3040
50
60
70
80
90
100
1991 n=16 1992 n=43 1993 n=50 1994 n=35 1995 n=48 1996 n=41 1997 n=35 1998 n=17 % o
f T O R r e q u e s t i n g e x t e r n a l r e p o r t i n g
s t r a t e g i e s
Fig. 6. Requests for identification of performance indicators in TOR over time.
Fig. 7. Requests for external reporting strategies in TOR over time.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90100
1991 n=16 1992 n=43 1993 n=50 1994 n=35 1995 n=48 1996 n=41 1997 n=35 1998 n=17
Fig. 8. Requests for follow-up review strategies in TOR over time.
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
13/17
Does Environmental Impact Assessment Facilitate Environmental Management Activities? 13
mitigation strategies and corrective actions. This suggests that over time, and
with increasing experience with environmental management activities, Queensland
government agencies began to recognise the importance and potential benefitsof EIA follow-up activities.
As with trends in follow-up commitments in EISs, Figs. 6–8 also indicate
that the trends differed for different follow-up activities, with over 90 per cent
of TOR in 1998 requesting performance indicators, whereas just over 50 per
cent of these TOR requested follow-up review strategies. This may suggest that
government agencies have had more experience with some follow-up activities
than others, or alternatively, consider some activities more important than others.
Most importantly, however, these results indicate that improvements in
environmental management commitments in Queensland appear to have resulted
from increasing government agency requirements. This provides empirical evidence
to support claims that one important strategy for improving follow-up environmental
management is the introduction of mandatory requirements for follow-up
commitments and activities as a part of the EIA process (Dipper et al., 1998).
Another strategy for improving EIA follow-up identified in this study is the
provision of detailed government guidance to assist proponents in planning and
implementing environmental management activities. Such guidance was developed
by the Queensland Department of Environment and accompanied the TOR requestsfor follow-up commitments from April 1996 onwards. This document, Guidelines
for the Preparation of Environmental Management Plans, provided detailed advice
regarding the purpose, components, format and an example of comprehensive
environmental management commitments (Queensland Department of Environment,
1996).
Statistical analysis revealed that the inclusion of the guidelines with the TOR
resulted in a significantly greater level of provision of follow-up commitments
in EISs. This was the case for all of the follow-up activities, except mitigationstrategies, which were usually included in EISs irrespective of the inclusion
of the guidelines. Figures 9–11 show the differences in provision of performance
indicators, external reporting and follow-up review strategies in EISs where the
guidelines were and were not provided, respectively. These results suggest that
the trend of increasing follow-up commitments over time, in particular,
improvements from 1996 onwards, may also be a result of the provision of
the follow-up planning guidelines.
Another potential strategy for improving follow-up environmental management
commitments is through increased awareness of their potential benefits amongst
EIA consultants and other environmental practitioners (Ortolano et al., 1987).
The potential for “professional control” to have influenced trends in environmental
management commitments in this study appeared limited, as 71 per cent of
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
14/17
14 T. Nitz & I. Holland
0
20
40
60
80
100
No Guidelines provided n=233 Guidelines provided n=51
% o
f E I S s
Fig. 9. Proportion of EISs containing performance indicators.
0
20
40
60
80
100
No Guidelines provided n=233 Guidelines provided n=51
% o
f E I S s
Fig. 10. Proportion of EISs containing external reporting strategies.
Fig. 11. Proportion of EISs containing follow-up review commitments.
0
20
40
60
80100
No Guidelines provided n=233 Guidelines provided n=51
% o
f E I S s
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
15/17
Does Environmental Impact Assessment Facilitate Environmental Management Activities? 15
the EISs were prepared by consultants who prepared only that one EIS during
the study period. It seems unlikely that there is significant professional control
in EIA generally when the consultants preparing EISs have so little to do withthe impact assessment process.
Amongst the few consultants with extensive EIA experience (prepared > 5
EISs in the study period), the picture is a little different. Only one consultant
provided environmental management commitments in more detail than the average,
and that greater level of detail was confined to performance indicators, external
reporting and environmental management review strategies. This suggests that
EIA practitioners may have limited potential to influence follow-up environmental
management activities. However, what is worth noting is that this one consultant
was preparing EISs for just one type of development: feedlots. Any improvement
in providing environmental management commitments seems, therefore, more
likely to be a result of the consultant having an in-depth knowledge of a particular
development type, rather than being a product of professional control.
Conclusions
The results presented in this paper have provided empirical evidence of EIA
follow-up within Queensland, both within the TOR for EISs, and within theactual EISs. While there is considerable room for improvement, this does suggest
that Sadler’s (1996) argument that EIA follow-up is poorly developed may be
slightly pessimistic. Indeed the trend of increasing follow-up commitments over
time identified in this study suggests that there has been considerable development
in follow-up environmental management activities within the Queensland EIA
process.
However, the examination of causes of increasing environmental management
commitments highlighted the need for government action to encourage thesetrends. Making follow-up commitments a mandatory part of EIA practice is
critical to enhancing planning and implementation of environmental management
activities. This provides empirical evidence to support Dipper et al.’s (1998)
suggestion that developing binding requirements is an important strategy for
improving EIA follow-up.
This study has also provided evidence that government action can facilitate
improvements in environmental management activities through the provision of
detailed guidance to assist proponents. This supports the suggestion that
improvements in other aspects of EIA practice (such as Strategic Environmental
Assessment in England and Wales) are resulting from the publication of detailed
government guidance (Therivel, 1998).
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
16/17
16 T. Nitz & I. Holland
While this paper has demonstrated the benefits of government action in enhancing
EIA follow-up commitments, it has not ruled out the potential contribution of
other factors, including those identified by Ortolano et al. (1987) as importantinfluences on EIA effectiveness, such as the experience of proponents and EIA
practitioners with follow-up planning, and non-governmental organisation pressure.
Our preliminary analysis, however, suggests there was little potential for EIA
practitioners to influence follow-up environmental management in the Queensland
EIA process.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Ms Edilyn Bajracharya
from the Queensland Department of Environment and Ms Emily Thomas from
the Queensland Department of Housing, Local Government and Planning for
their assistance in locating the EISs. We would also like to thank Professor
Lex Brown for his comments on the paper.
References
Agresti, A. & Finlay, B. (1997) Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, 3rd edn.New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
Amir, S. & Mosseri, Y. (1997) Evaluation of performance of EIS regulations: An
empirical investigation of Israel’s program. Impact Assessment , 15, 127–158
Au, E. & Sanvicens, G. (1996) EIA follow up and monitoring and management. Report
of the EIA Process Strengthening Workshop, Canberra, 4–7 April 1995 , Australian
Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), pp. 91–103. Canberra: EPA
Environmental Protection Authority (EPA, 1996) Report of the EIA Process Strengthening
Workshop, Canberra, 4–7 April 1995. Canberra: EPA
Bailey, J. (1997) Environmental impact assessment and management: An underexploredrelationship. Environmental Management , 21(3), 317–327
Bisset, R. & Tomlinson, P. (1988) Monitoring and auditing of impacts. In Environmental
Impact Assessment: Theory and Practice, ed. P. Wathern, pp. 117–128. London:
Unwin Hyman
Brew, D. & Lee, N. (1996) Monitoring, environmental management plans and post-
project analysis. EIA Newsletter , 12, http://www.art.man.ac.uk/eia
Brisbane City Council (BCC, 1996), Environmental Best Management Practice for
Environmental Impact Assessment . Brisbane: Brisbane City Council
Brown, A.L. & Hill, R.C. (1995) Decision-scoping: Making EA learn how the designprocess works. Project Appraisal, 10(4), 223–232
Buckley, R. (1989) Precision in Environmental Impact Prediction: First National
Environmental Audit, Australia. Canberra: Centre for Resource and Environmental
Studies/Australian National University Press
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .
-
8/17/2019 DOES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FACILITATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES?
17/17
Does Environmental Impact Assessment Facilitate Environmental Management Activities? 17
Dipper, B., Jones, C. & Wood, C. (1998) Monitoring and post-auditing in environ-
mental impact assessment: A review. Journal of Environmental Planning and
Management , 41(6), pp. 731–747
Fairweather, P.G. (1989) Environmental impact assessment: Where is the science in EIA?
Search, 20(5), 141–148
Hickie, D. & Wade, M. (1997) The development of environmental action plans: Turning
statements into actions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management ,
40(6), 789–801.
Horberry, J. (1996) Monitoring and environmental management plans in the EA process
applied to development aid projects. EIA Newsletter , 12, http://www.art.man.ac.uk/
eia
James, D. (1995) Environmental impact assessment: Improving processes and techniques.
Australian Journal of Environmental Management , 2, 78–89
Leu, W.S., Williams, W.P. & Bark, A.W. (1996) Quality control mechanisms and
environmental impact assessment effectiveness with special reference to the UK.
Project Appraisal, 11(1), 2–12
Local Government (Planning and Environment ) Act 1990–1998 (Queensland).
Local Government (Planning and Environment ) Regulation 1991 (Queensland).
McDonald, G.T. & Brown, A.L. (1995) Going beyond environmental impact assessment:
Environmental input to planning and design. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,
15, 483–495
Moon, B. (1998) Environmental impact assessment in Queensland, Australia: A
governmental massacre! Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 16(1), 33–47
Morrison-Saunders, A. (1996) Environmental impact assessment as a tool for ongoing
environmental management. Project Appraisal, 11(2), 95–104
Ortolano, L., Jenkins, B. & Abracosa, R.P. (1987) Speculations on when and why EIA
is effective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 7, 285–292
Ortolano, L. & Shepherd, A. (1995) Environmental impact assessment: Challenges and
opportunities. Impact Assessment , 13, 3–30
Queensland Department of Environment (1996) Guidelines for preparing Environmental
Management Programs. Brisbane: Department of Environment
Sadler, B. (1996) International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment:
Final Report — Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice
to Improve Performance, http://www.environment.gov.au/net/eianet
Sanvicens, G.D.E. & Baldwin, P.J. (1996) Environmental monitoring and audit in Hong
Kong. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management , 39(3), 429–440
Therivel, R. (1998) Strategic environmental assessment of development plans in Great
Britain. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18(1), pp. 39–57
Wood, C. (1995) Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review
. Harlow:Longman
Zar, J.H. (1996) Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edn. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
J . E n v . A s s m t . P o l . M g m t . 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 : 1 - 1 7 . D
o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . w o r l d s c i e n t i f i c . c o m
b y T E C H N I O N - I S R A E L I N S T O F T E C H N
O L O G Y o n 0 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 . F o r p e r s o n a l
u s e o n l y .