doc_20326

Upload: souleymane2013

Post on 03-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    1/22

    Amnesty International

    CORPORATEACCOUNTABILITYShell & Vedanta

    Youth Group Action : April 2010

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    2/22

    SHELL CAMPAIGN UPDATE

    Amnesty Youth Groups

    have sent more than1,500 postcards, letters,

    placards and banners to

    Peter Voser, the chief

    executive of

    Shell, protesting aboutthe companys behaviour.

    Thanks to your efforts weve been keeping Shells human

    rights record under the spotlight up and down the UK.

    And your actions are really having an impact!

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    3/22

    OVERVIEW: SHELL IN THE NIGER DELTA

    The Niger Delta has massive

    and very valuable oil

    deposits, but the majority of

    Its 31 million inhabitants live

    in poverty.

    Shell is responsible for 80%

    of oil and gas extraction in

    the area. Its damaging

    practices are stripping the

    inhabitants of their human rights and keeping them in poverty.

    Rather than protect its people, the Nigerian Government has

    abandoned them to the oil companies.

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    4/22

    FACTFILE ON THE NIGER DELTA

    Location: Nigeria, West Africa

    Population: 31 million

    Area: Approx 70,000 km2

    Ethnic groups: over 40,

    including the Efik Eburutu, IbibioNation, Annang Nation, Oron

    Nation, & Ogoni people

    Languages: 250 dialects are

    spoken

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    5/22

    THE IMPACT OF SHELLS OPERATIONS ON

    HUMAN RIGHTS

    Oil spills, gas flaring* and pollution are all having a

    devastating impact on the land and rivers these

    communities depend upon.

    Local people are left to drink polluted water, eat contaminated

    fish, farm on spoiled land, and breathe air that stinks of oil

    and gas.

    In August 2008, a Shell pipeline leaked more than 1,600

    barrels of oil into local waterways at Bodo Creek.

    Sadly this is just one of a series of shocking pollution

    incidents which Shell and the Nigerian Government have not

    responded to adequately.

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    6/22

    THE IMPACT OF SHELLS OPERATIONS ON

    HUMAN RIGHTS

    * What is gas flaring?

    When oil is pumped out of the ground, the gas produced is

    separated and, in Nigeria, most of it is burnt as waste.

    This is extremely wasteful and environmentally damaging, and

    there are concerns that it has a negative impact on human

    health. It has been illegal in Nigeria since 1984, but Shell

    continue to do it.

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    7/22

    THE IMPACT OF SHELLS OPERATIONS ON

    HUMAN RIGHTS

    We want the Federal Ministry of Environment and Shell

    Petroleum Development Company in particular to come and put

    a stop to this My people dont go to fishing any longer youcan see the devastating effects and this is our main source of

    livelihood.

    Representative of the Bodo community, after oil spill at Bodo,

    Ogoniland, 2008

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    8/22

    THE IMPACT OF SHELLS OPERATIONS ON

    HUMAN RIGHTS

    Decades of pollution in the Niger Delta has led to serious human rights violations,driving the people of the region into poverty.

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    9/22

    WHICH HUMAN RIGHTS IS SHELL ABUSING?

    Right to

    clean

    water

    Right to an

    adequate

    standard ofliving

    Right to earn a

    living through

    work Right to health +a healthyenvironment

    Right

    to food

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    10/22

    THE IMPACT OF SHELLS OPERATIONS ON

    HUMAN RIGHTS

    A local fisherman described the

    devastation caused by oil spills:

    If you want to go fishing, you

    have to paddle for about four

    hours through several rivers

    before you can get to where youcan catch fish some of the

    fishes we catch, when you open

    the stomach, it smells of crude

    oil.

    Hundreds of thousands of people are affected, particularly the poorest

    and those that rely on traditional livelihoods such as fishing and

    agriculture.

    A fisherman with his canoe in Goi, Ogoniland.

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/sites/impact.amnesty.org/files/PUBLIC/Regions/AFR/nigeria-niger-delta-03.jpg
  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    11/22

    VIOLENCE IN THE NIGER DELTA

    Poverty and pollution have sparked protests against Shell and

    other oil companies, and some of these protests have been

    violent.

    Armed gangs have formed, and have been involved in sabotage,theft, property destruction, and kidnapping oil workers. Amnesty

    condemns this violence.

    The recent increase in confrontations between armed groups

    and government security forces has negatively impacted on thepeople of the Niger Delta.

    In June 2009, tens of thousands of people fled their homes to

    avoid fighting between government forces and group known as

    the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta.

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    12/22

    SHELLS RESPONSE TO AMNESTYS CAMPAIGN

    Your actions are clearly having an impact,

    as Shells PR machine has been going into

    overdrive. Many Amnesty groups have

    received letters from Shell in response totheir appeals to CEO Peter Voser.

    Shells response has been disappointing but not surprising.

    They focus on the complexity of the situation in the Niger Delta

    without acknowledging their own role in human rights

    violations.

    Below you will find detailed responses to some of the claims

    which Shell has been making in these letters.

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    13/22

    SHELLS RESPONSE TO AMNESTYS CAMPAIGN

    Shell claim that the situation in the Niger Delta is complexand that Amnesty has not adequately reflected this,ignoring the realities and root causes

    Not true -Amnestys report (Petroleum, pollution and poverty inthe Niger Delta) focuses on some of the root causes of conflictand poverty in the region. These include: the impact of half acentury of pollution and environmental damage; the lack ofaccess to justice for the people of the Niger Delta, who faceextreme difficulties in bringing legal proceedings againstmultinational corporations like Shell; and a lack of transparencyin relation to the impacts of the oil industry. Communities arerarely given information about the impact of Shells operationson their environment and human rights.

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    14/22

    SHELLS RESPONSE TO AMNESTYS CAMPAIGN

    Shell claim that 85% of the oil spillage in the Niger Delta is causedby attacks and sabotage

    It is difficult to put an accurate figure on the proportion of oil spills caused by sabotage,as opposed to corrosion and equipment failure. There is often no independentinvestigation into the cause of a spill, and given that Shell has to pay compensation if a

    spill is caused by corrosion or equipment failure, their own figures may not be reliable.

    This is illustrated by the case of a major oil spill at Batan in Delta State in 2002. Shellwrote to the Governor of Delta State claiming the spill was caused by sabotage. Theletter was written two days before the investigation was done. An independentinvestigation showed the cause of the spill to be equipment failure.

    By their own admission, most of the oil spilt by Shell between 1989 and 1994 was due tocorrosion or operational problems and only 28% was attributed to sabotage. In 2007Shells estimates had risen to 70% and in response to Amnestys report, Shell estimates85%.

    While Amnesty acknowledges that sabotage and vandalism are serious problems, we are

    not aware of any credible evidence to support this data.

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    15/22

    SHELLS RESPONSE TO AMNESTYS CAMPAIGN

    Shell claims it does disclose its social and environmental impact

    assessments

    Shell asserts that Environmental and Social Impact Assessments have

    been and are being made public, but the company did not provide any

    Environmental Impact Assessments to Amnesty International, despite

    repeated requests made whilst researching our report.

    Although assessments are meant to be available in government offices,

    when Amnesty tried to obtain copies from one local government office,staff were afraid to provide them but did not say why. We believe

    assessments should also be made available to the affected

    communities not just sitting in local offices.

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    16/22

    SHELLS RESPONSE TO AMNESTYS CAMPAIGN

    Shell does not believe Amnesty has adequately

    acknowledged the companys contribution to Nigerias

    economy and community development in the Niger

    Delta.

    Amnestys report acknowledges that Shell has made some

    positive contributions in Nigeria. However, human rights

    abuses cannot be offset. The funds spent by Shell on

    education, as well as infrastructure, do not reverse thedamage done to communities as a result of Shells core

    business activities in the Delta.

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    17/22

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    18/22

    TAKE ACTION 2: SHOW THE FILM

    See how 200 students from Amnesty groups across the UK

    marched a 40-metre-long gas pipeline through the streets of

    London to protest about Shells harmful practice of gas

    flaring in the Niger Delta. The film is available online at

    www.amnesty.org.uk/youth

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    19/22

    RESOURCES

    You can read the full report Petroleum, pollution

    and poverty in the Niger Delta at

    www.amnesty.org.uk/dignity

    Watch the video:Shells damaging practices in the Niger Delta are

    revealed.

    http://www.protectthehuman.com/videos/welcome-to-

    shell

    Watch the video:

    Exeter University Amnesty group head to their local

    Shell station to give it a jolly good clean up!

    http://www.protectthehuman.com/videos/the-big-

    shell-cleanup

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    20/22

    MINING COMPANY IN THE SPOTLIGHT OVER

    HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES

    On 9 February an Amnesty delegation

    Presented Vedanta Resources with a

    report showing how pollution from their

    alumina refinery in Lanjigarh, Orissa,

    India threatens the health of localpeople and their access to water. The

    report also shows that Vedantas plans

    to open a bauxite mine in the nearby Niyamgiri Hills could threaten

    the way of life of the indigenous Dongria Kondh community, who

    depend on the hills for their water, food, livelihoods and culturalidentity.

    The Dongria Kondh do not cut trees or cultivate the top of the hill as

    they believe that their deity (god) Niyam Raja Penu lives there. Now

    they face the prospect of a 700-hectare open-cast mine in their

    holiest place.

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    21/22

    MINING COMPANY IN THE SPOTLIGHT OVER

    HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES

    Just days before the Amnesty report was published, the Church

    of England announced that it was withdrawing its investments

    from Vedanta because of its concerns over the companys

    human rights record. The Rowntree Trust, Marlborough Ethical

    Fund andMillfield House Foundation sold their shares, worth 2.2 million,

    soon afterwards.

    Amnesty International is calling on Vedanta to address the

    human rights and environmental impacts of their aluminarefinery, and not to expand the refinery or begin mining until the

    current problems are resolved. Amnesty is also calling on the

    Indian authorities to set up a process to seek the consent of the

    Dongria Kondh before allowing Vedanta to start mining.

    For more information: www.protectthehuman.com/vedanta

  • 7/28/2019 doc_20326

    22/22

    TAKE ACTION 3: SIGN THE PETITION

    We have launched a petition to hand over at Vedantas AGM in July

    this year.

    Please send all signed petitions back to us by 20th June at the

    latest.

    You can also sign the petition online at

    www.protectthehuman.com/vedanta