doc.: ieee 802.15-00/205r2 submission 27 october, 2000 pat kinney, intermec technologies project:...
TRANSCRIPT
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)(WPANs)
Submission Title: 00205r2P802.15_TG3-MAC-Proposal-for-High-Rate-WPANDate Submitted: 27 October, 2000Source: Patrick Kinney Company Intermec TechnologiesAddress 550 Second St. S.E., Cedar Rapids, IA, USAVoice:+1.319.369.3593, FAX: +1.319.369.3299, E-Mail:[email protected]
Re: Revision to the earlier proposal for TG3 MAC
Abstract: Presentation format of Proposed MAC for 802.15.3
Purpose: For consideration as the baseline of the MAC for 802.15.3
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
TG3 MAC Proposal for High Rate WPAN
This MAC proposal has been improved from its earlier submission. Significant changes include a QoS mechanism from A Heberling’s MAC proposal, Selective rejection ACKs, RTS/CTS is now optional, and revised numbers for throughput and current drain.
Document 00/218r1 provides the technical backup for this presentation.
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
Targeted Applications for PicoLink (1Mb/s)
• Cable replacement (point to point)– Barcode scanner to portable/mobile
computer
– Printer to portable/mobile computer
• Personal area connectivity (peer to peer)
– hand held computer to numerous peripheral devices including scanners, printers, wide area network radios, etc.
SCAN EntEnt
1 2 3
0
7 8 9
4 5 6
F1 F2 F3 F4
F9 F10 F11 F12
F5 F6 F7 F8
33
PEN*KEY 6500Picking Application
Scan Item 000123456Description: Tide Liq., 50oz.Scan Location: BAY 31Enter Quantity: 40
Take to Location: Dock 5A
Keyboard Keypad Help Exit
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
High Rate WPANsExisting WPANs
Newly Targeted Applications
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
WPAN Solution Requirements•Very low cost
•Low power consumption
•Small size
•Minimal attach/detach times
•Interference immunity
•Ease of use
•Standardized interfaces
•Unlicensed, international usability
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
PicoLink™ Advantages•Proven: Shipping for two years in a 1 Mb/s WPAN
•Very low cost
•Low power consumption
•Small size (ASIC gate count and F/W size)
•Fast response times, quick attach times
•Superior trade-off between response time and current drain
•Ease of use
•Temporary split networks
•Adaptability to different usage scenarios (PAN & Infrastructured)
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
Picolink™ Configurations
PersonalAreaNetwork
InfrastructuredNetwork
Access Point
PowerShip terminalAstra Printer
DADS Terminal
EST
PowerPad
Ethernet
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
Picolink™ Configurations
PersonalAreaNetwork
PowerShip terminalAstra Printer
DADS Terminal
EST
PowerPad
• Personal Area Network (PAN; Peer-to-Peer)– Multiple Networks co-habitate (20 or more have been tested at
current 1 MHz data rate, but this attribute is strongly dependent upon the PHY)
– Dynamic PAN and device IDs with network initiation
– Network maintained devices coming and going
– Temporary devices and Networks also supported
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
Picolink™ Configurations
Limited InfrastructuredNetworkAccess Point
Ethernet
• Limited Infrastructured Network– Main device (access point) typically has power at all times (for
fast access)
– Support for up to 10 devices
– Ethernet access points with higher layer protocol
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Transparent to Upper Layer Protocols
• Ease of Use– Unique 48 bit address– Simple network join/un-join procedure– Device registration
• CSMA: – Proven in current wired and wireless
networks– Superior performance in high bandwidths
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • RTS/CTS: to avoid the hidden node
issue, an optional RTS/CTS mode is supported with the Contention Access Period
• ACK: To support a virtual error free delivery system ACKs are supported. Selective rejection is offered to reduce the ACK overhead
• Peer to peer transmission reduces bandwidth requirements for non-master data transfers.
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Delivered Data Throughput
– For the proposed raw data rate of 22 Mbps a throughput of 20 Mbps is anticipated (e.g. large transfer, Rx-Tx to 10µS, 1024 byte frames)
• Fast Response – Average response time for small packets is
under 5 mS for current 1 Mbps system– Response time for TG3 will be dependent
upon PHY and Superframe configuration
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Data Transfer Types
– Asynchronous• short response times• CSMA/CA; collision sense/collision avoidance
(similarities to 802.11 and 802.3)
– Isochronous: time bounded delivery using the Heberling MAC’s QoS mechanism
– Mixed traffic load management• slots for Async and Isoch
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
MAC Protocol Superframe
Maintain station synchronization•coordinate sleep cycles•FH coordination (if necessary)•Asynchronous slot/cycle assignments•Isochronous slot/cycle assignments
Asynchronous slots
Isochronous slots
ContentionAccessPeriod
Be
aco
n Contention Free Period
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
MAC Protocol Superframe:Contention Access Period
All control messages such as: •attachment requests•authentication responses•slot cycle requestsIn addition short data frames could be sent in this period
Asynchronous slots
Isochronous slots
ContentionAccessPeriod
Be
aco
n Contention Free Period
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
MAC Protocol Superframe: Contention Free Period
Asynchronous slots are composed of cycles assigned to stations
Asynchronous slots
Isochronous slots
ContentionAccessPeriod
Be
aco
n Contention Free Period
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Topology
– Minimum number of active connections• Up to 10 nodes per network
– Ad hoc network• Fully supported• Temporal ad-hoc networks are also supported
– Access to portal• Any node on the network can provide a portal to
another network• Multiple portals are possible
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Reliability
– Master redundancy• in a peer to peer network the “master” merely
coordinates the scheduled services. Data transfers occur between the desired nodes without assistance from the “master”
• Any node on the network can assume the master(coordinator) role either by request from the master or by disappearance of the master
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Reliability (cont’d)
– Loss of connection• The proposed system does provide a method
for detection and recovering from the loss of a link
• System has options allowing it to conserve current drain by allowing periodic searches for link re-establishment rather than continuous searches
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Power Management Types
– Sleeping• Multiple time increments for sleeping are
selectable, e.g. 1,2…beacon periods
– Wakeup• Schedule service intervals allow the MAC to
adapt to various PHY wakeup times
– Polling• Beacons are scheduled and allow the nodes to
wakeup listen for any pending messages and then go back to sleep if there are no messages
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Power Consumption of MAC controller
State .8µ .25µ .18µ – Transmit (mA): 30 18 9– Receive (mA): 30 18 9– Sleep (µA): 30 18 9– Other Power Consumption Features
• Programmable search duty cycle during loss of connect
• Slave to slave links require less energy in a Peer to Peer topology than a Master/Slave topology
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Security
– Authentication: Propose a Public Key method
– Privacy: Propose the use of the 802.15.1 algorithm
• Quality of Service– Time bounded algorithm from Heberling’s
MAC using slot cycle TDMA
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Cost/Complexity
– Baseband controller– functionality described for the HR MAC is
estimated to be 10,000 gates.
– Code size– under 32 Kbytes w/o proposed enhancements
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
CRITERIA REF. Comparison Values- Same +
Transparent to UpperLayer Protocols(TCP/IP)
3.1 FALSE TRUE N/A
Unique 48-bit Address 3.2.1 Not Qualified(required by802)
Essential N/A
Simple NetworkJoin/UnJoin Proceduresfor RF enabled devices
3.2.3 Extendedprocedure forjoining network
802.15.1 style join asspecified in sections8.10.6, 9.3.23 and11.6.5.5
Enhanced self-configuration ofnetwork
Device Registration 3.2.3 Requires manualconfiguration
802.15.1 styleregistration asspecified in sections8.10.7 and 11.6.5.1-4.
Auto registration basedon profile
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
CRITERIA REF. Comparison Values- Same +
Minimum delivered datathroughput
3.3.2 20 Mbps minusMAC overhead
20 Mbps > 20 Mbps
High end delivered datathroughput (Mbps)
3.3.3 20 – 39 Mbps 40 Mbps > 40 Mbps
Data Transfer Types 3.4 Asynchronousonly
Asynchronous orIsochronous
Mixed Mode(Asynchronous &Isochronoussimultaneously)
Topology 3.5.1 Point-to-Multipoint only
Point-to-Multipoint &Point-to-Point (with noPeer-to-Peer)
Point-to-Multipoint,Point-to-Point &Peer-to-Peer
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
CRITERIA REF. Comparison Values- Same +
Max. # of activeconnections
3.5.2 < 7 7 > 7
Ad-Hoc Network 3.5.3 FALSE TRUE EnhancedAccess to a Portal 3.5.4 FALSE TRUE N/AMaster Redundancy 3.6.2 FALSE TRUE EnhancedLoss of Connection 3.6.3 FALSE TRUE N/APower ManagementTypes
3.7 Does not supportpower savingsmodes
Supports 802.15.1power savings modesas specified in sections8.10.8.2-4 and11.6.6.1-5
Enhanced powersavings modes
27 October, 2000
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r2
Submission
CRITERIA REF. Comparison Values- Same +
Power Consumption ofMAC controller (thepeak power of the MACcombined with anappropriate PHY)
3.8 > 1.5 watts Between .5 watt and1.5 watts
< .5 watt
Authentication 3.9.1 Noauthentication
802.15.1 styleauthentication asspecified in sections8.14.4 and 9.3.2
Enhancedauthentication at MAClayer
Privacy 3.9.2 No encryption Encryption as specifiedin 802.15.1 section8.14.3 and 9.3.6
Enhanced privacy atMAC layer
Quality of Service 3.9.2 No provisionsfor QoS
Equivalent to QoSspecified in 802.15.1section 9.3.20 , 10.6.3and 11.6.6.6
Streams,priority,Controlled latency/jitterbounds, Connectionagreements, Dynamicbandwidth allocation,Selectiveretransmission,Dynamic channelselection