doc.: ieee 802.11-11/0224r0 submission march 2011 bruce kraemer (marvell)slide 1 wg11 snapshot march...

March 2011

Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

Slide 1

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

WG11 Snapshot March ‘11

Date: 13 -March-2011

Authors:

Name Company Address Phone email Bruce Kraemer Marvell 5488 Marvell Ln

Santa Clara, CA 95054

+1-321-427-4098

[email protected]

March 2011


Slide 2

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

PAR Expiration/Renewal ScheduleProject PAR Expiration Date

MB 31-DEC-2011

S 31-DEC-2011

Revision 31-DEC-2012

AA 31-DEC-2012

AC 31-DEC-2012

AD 31-DEC-2012

AE 31-DEC-2013

AF 31-DEC-2013

AH 31-DEC-2014

AI 31-DEC-2014https://development.standards.ieee.org/pub/active-pars?n=22&o=1a0a2a3d

March 2011


Slide 3

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

March 2011


Slide 4

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

WG11 Task & Study Group Officers – Mar 2011Cat Group Chair Vice Chair Technical Editor Secretary

WG WG11 Bruce Kraemer Jon RosdahlAdrian Stephens

Adrian Stephens Peter Ecclesine

Stephen McCann

TG Mb Dorothy Stanley Michael Montemurro Adrian Stephens Jon Rosdahl

TG S Dee Denteneer Guido Hiertz Kazuyuki Sakoda Guenael Strutt

TG U Stephen McCann none Necati Canpolat Dave Stephenson

TG V Dorothy Stanley none Emily Qi -OPEN-

TG AA Ganesh Venkatesan Alex Ashley Alex Ashley Ganesh Venkatesan

TG AC Osama Aboul-Magd Menzo Wentink, Joonsuk Kim Robert Stacey -OPEN-

TG AD Eldad Perahia Vinko Erceg, James Yee Carlos Cordeiro -OPEN-

TG AE Michael Montemurro Henry Ptasinski -OPEN-

TG AF Peter Ecclesine Peter Ecclesine Zhou Lan

TG AH Dave Halasz noneWongYu Song Jae-Hyung Song

TG AI Hiroshi Mano Marc Emmelmann Tom SiepSC WNG Clint Chaplin

Ad hoc ARC Bruce Kraemer

Ad hoc JTC1 Andrew Myles

Ad hoc REG Peter Ecclesine

Ad hoc SG Bruce Kraemer

NYRQ = Not yet required, nominations are not open OPEN = Candidate Nominations are open

March 2011


Slide 5

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

WG11 Task & Study Group Officers – Mar 2011-adjCat Group Chair Vice Chair Technical Editor Secretary

WG WG11 Bruce Kraemer Jon RosdahlAdrian Stephens

Adrian Stephens Peter Ecclesine

Stephen McCann

TG Mb Dorothy Stanley Michael Montemurro Adrian Stephens Jon Rosdahl

TG S Dee Denteneer Guido Hiertz Kazuyuki Sakoda Guenael Strutt

TG U Stephen McCann none Necati Canpolat Dave Stephenson

TG V Dorothy Stanley none Emily Qi -OPEN-

TG AA Ganesh Venkatesan Alex Ashley Alex Ashley Ganesh Venkatesan

TG AC Osama Aboul-Magd Menzo Wentink, Joonsuk Kim Robert Stacey -OPEN-

TG AD Eldad Perahia Vinko Erceg, James Yee Carlos Cordeiro -OPEN-

TG AE Michael Montemurro Henry Ptasinski -OPEN-

TG AF Peter Ecclesine Peter Ecclesine Zhou Lan

TG AH Dave Halasz noneWongYu Song Jae-Hyung Song

TG AI Hiroshi Mano Marc Emmelmann Tom SiepSC WNG Clint Chaplin

Ad hoc ARC Bruce Kraemer

Ad hoc JTC1 Andrew Myles

Ad hoc REG Peter Ecclesine

Ad hoc SG Bruce Kraemer

NYRQ = Not yet required, nominations are not open OPEN = Candidate Nominations are open

March 2011


Slide 6

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

March 2011


Slide 7

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

IEEE 802.11 Standards Pipeline

PHY

SponsorBallot

MAC

Study groups

802.11kRRM

802.11rFast Roam

802.11b (’99)11 Mbps2.4GHz

PublishedStandard

a 54 Mbps5GHz

g54 Mbps2.4GHz

eQoS

iSecurity

f Inter AP

hDFS & TPC

802.11VNetwork

Management

802.11sMesh

802.11uWIEN

802.11YContention

BasedProtocol

WG Letter Ballot

802.11 -2007

802.11aaVideo Transport

802.11acVHT 5GHz

802.11adVHT 60GHz

TG without draftDiscussion Topics

PublishedAmendment

802.11aeQoS Mgmt Frm

802.11nHigh

Throughput(>100 Mbps)

802.11WManagement

Frame Security

802.11zTDLS

802.11pWAVE

802.11afTVWS

Smart Grid

802.11aiFILS

802.11 ah

802.11mbRevision

March 2011


Slide 8

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

July 2010

Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)Slide 8Slide 8

WG11 Editor Abstract / Agenda – Mar 2011

• Roll Call / Contacts / Reflector• Go round table and get brief status report• ANA Status / Process / What is administered• 802.11 Mandatory Editorial Coordination before

SB• Numbering Alignment process / Spreadsheet• Amendment Ordering / Draft Snapshots• MIB style and Frame practices (FrameMaker 9.0)• Style Guide for 802.11

March 2011


Slide 9

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

WNG SC – March 2011

• Review of objectives

• Review Objectives for May 2011 Meeting

March 2011


Slide 10

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission Slide 10

IEEE 802.11 ARC SC – March 2011

• 802.11 ARC SC meets “as needed”

• Topics for March plenary– 802.1 architecture document revision effort– Goal is to complete comment resolution– Dave not here- supporting from office

March 2011


Slide 11

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

March 2011

Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)Slide 11Slide 11

TGmb - March 2011 • Initial Recirculation Sponsor Ballot on Draft 7.0

closed 5 Nov– Pool 186, 132 affirmative – 90%, 14 Disapprove – 9%, 9 Abstain – 6%

– 132 (+44) comments

• This meeting – Comment resolution, work towards second recirculation SB

– Update timeline

• Agenda in 11-11-0291• Incorporate published amendments

– 11v, 11u being incorporated in D7.01, D7.03

– 11s, when published

March 2011


Slide 12

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

March 2011

Slide 12Slide 12

IEEE 802.11s Mesh Networking• TGs had a successful ad hoc meeting in Eindhoven in order to

– Prepare Draft 9.0,

– Start preparations for the mesh tutorial

• TGs Draft 9.0 passed the 2nd Recirculation Sponsor Ballot (closing March 5) with 95.% approval and 291 comments, see below. Both figures were comparable to the first recirculation Sponsor Ballot.

• During the Singapore meeting,– The TG will present a mesh tutorial on Monday Evening

– The focus is on comment resolution, and Disapprove comments– Tentatively, we expect a third recirculation to happen shortly after Singapore

1

editorial Technical/General

Must be satisfied 82 28% 92 31%

Other 60 21% 57 20%


Come and see the tutorial on Monday

7.30-9.00

March 2011


Slide 13

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

Jan 2011

Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)Slide 13

IEEE 802.11aa – Singapore

• Goals:• Resolve 2nd recirculation LB comments and approve

corresponding resolutions

• Start recirculation letter ballot on Draft 4.0

• Joint Meeting with 802.1AVB (Thursday AM1)

• Opening report in document 11/0222r0

March 2011


Slide 14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

January 2011


IEEE 802.11ac – March 2011• Draft D0.1 Comments Resolution

• Continue with Ad Hoc group meetings and straw polls.• Technical Submissions

• Agenda in document 11-11/0290r0

March 2011


Slide 15

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

TGad – March Meeting Goals

• Finish comment resolution on D1.0• Approve D2.0• Joint meeting with China WPAN on Saturday

March 19th, 9am - 12pm

March 2011


Slide 16

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

Month Year

John Doe, Some CompanySlide 16

TGae March 2011 Summary

• Find a TG Secretary

• LB 172 Result Summary:– 86% Approval (155 Approve, 26 Disapprove, 38 Abstain).

• Complete LB 172 Comment Resolution– 380 Comments (138 Editorial, 242 Technical)

• Approve Recirculation LB

• Revise plan of record.

March 2011


Slide 17

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

March 2011

Slide 17Slide 17

TGaf – Meeting Goals March 2011

• Review the results of LB171

• Invite Andy Gowans to address D1.0 and the Ofcom DD plan [cannot attend; will send presentation]

• Divide the comments into categories and form Ad Hocs

• Comment resolution

• Group reassembly for accepting comment resolutions and listening to helpful presentations

• Plan for May meeting, including an ad hoc the week prior, and teleconferences

March 2011


Slide 18

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

IEEE 802.11ah Snapshot – March 2011

• Process to take TGah to Letter Ballot– 11/239 Proposed selection procedure

• Continue work on,– Use Cases

– Channel models

• Start work on,– Requirements

– Specification framework

• Update timeline

March 2011

David Halasz, OakTree WirelessSlide 18

March 2011


Slide 19

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

IEEE 802.11 FIA TGai – Singapore , March 2011

• Goals for the Meeting:– Review and Approve the Los Angels and Teleconference meeting

minutes

– Presentation of submissions• Approve a use case scenario documentation

• Approve a functional requirement documentation

– TIME line of task group

– Plan for May & Teleconference

March 2011


March 2011


Slide 20

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

Mar 2011


IEEE JTC1 ad hoc – Mar 2011

• The agenda items that will be addressed this week are:– Tuesday

• Review extended goals• Review status of liaisons previously sent to SC6• Discuss responses to identifier conflict liaison previously sent to SC6• Update on status of ISO/IEC 8802-11:2005• Update on status of ISO/IEC 8802-3:2000• Update on WAPI progress

– Wednesday• Discuss a proposed 802.1X/AE related liaison

– Thursday• Review and approve any liaisons to SC6• Approve delegation for next SC6 meeting

March 2011


Slide 21

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Goals - March 2011

• The regulatory summaries

• Regulatory issues status– FCC open issues

– Ofcom presentation on TGaf

– EN 300 328 revision update; actions in TG11

– FCC 5 GHz rules changes update

• Critical issues actions

March 2011

Slide 21

March 2011


Slide 22

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

Smart Grid – March 2011

Tuesday pm1 & Thursday am1 • Revision NIST Smart Grid PAP#2 Report plan.• Australian Smart Metering RFI• UK Consultation• Update of activities in P2030• Open SG• ITU Focus Group• ITU-R paper

March 2011


Slide 23

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

March 2011


Slide 24

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

Year Inter meeting Period

Ballots Completed

WG Sponsor

2010 July - Sept 2 7

2010 Sept - Nov 2 4

2010/2011 Nov - Jan 1 3

2011 Jan - Mar 3 2

Recent Ballot History

March 2011


Slide 25

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

WG – Initial – P802.11af – D1.0IEEE 802.11 WG Letter Ballot #171 was the initial 30 day Working Group Technical

Ballot asking the question "Should P802.11af D1.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?"

Ballot Opening Date: Tuesday January 25, 2010 - 23:59 ETBallot Closing Date: Thursday February 24, 2011 - 23:59 ET

300 eligible people are in this ballot group.

125 affirmative votes 76 negative votes 35 abstention votes === 236 votes received = 78.7% valid returns

= 14.8% valid abstentions

APPROVAL RATE:125 affirmative votes = 62.2 % affirmative 76 total negative votes = 37.8 % negative

The 75% affirmation requirement has not been met, Motion fails.There were 1302 comments received.

March 2011


Slide 26

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

WG – recirc – P802.11ae – D2.0802.11 Ballot #172 was a 15 day Working Group technical recirculation Ballot asking the

question "Should P802.11ae D2.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?". Ballot Opening Date: Thursday February 03, 2011 - 23:59 ETBallot Closing Date: Friday February 18, 2011 - 23:59 ET 278 eligible people are in this ballot group.




The 75% affirmation requirement has been met, Motion passes.There were 386 comments received.

March 2011


Slide 27

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

WG – recirc – P802.11aa – D3.0IEEE 802.11 WG Letter Ballot #173 was a 15 day Working Group Technical Ballot asking

the question "Should P802.11aa D3.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?"

Ballot Opening Date: Wednesday February 09, 2010 - 23:59 ETBallot Closing Date: Thursday February 24, 2011 - 23:59 ET

257eligible people are in this ballot group.




The 75% affirmation requirement has been met, Motion passes.

There were 421 comments received.

March 2011


Slide 28

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

Sponsor – recirc – P802.11rev – D7.0The IEEE P802.11REVmb (802.11 roll-up revision) 15 day recirculation Sponsor Ballot asked the

question “Should P802.11REVmb Draft 7.0 be forwarded to RevCom?” The official results for this Sponsor Ballot follow:

Ballot Opening Date: Thursday February 03, 2011 - 23:59 ETBallot Closing Date: Friday February 18, 2011 - 23:59 ET

RESPONSE RATE:


132 affirmative votes 14 negative votes with comments 0 negative vote without comments 9 abstention votes ======= 155 votes received = 83.3 % valid returns

= 5.8% valid abstentions APPROVAL RATE:132 affirmative votes = 90.4 % affirmative 14 total negative votes = 9.6 % negative

The motion passes.There were 167 comments received

March 2011


Slide 29

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0224r0

Submission

Sponsor – recirc – P802.11s – D9.0The second IEEE P802.11s (MESH networking) 15 day recirculation Sponsor Ballot asked the

question “Should P802.11s Draft 9.0 be forwarded to RevCom?”

Ballot Opening Date: Friday February 18, 2011 - 23:59 ETBallot Closing Date: Saturday March 05, 2011 - 23:59 ET

RESPONSE RATE:


134 affirmative votes 7 negative votes with comments 0 negative votes without comments 9 abstention votes ======= 150 votes received = 81.5 % valid returns

= 6.0% valid abstentions APPROVAL RATE:134 affirmative votes = 95.0 % affirmative 7 total negative votes = 5.0 % negative

The motion passes.There were 291 comments received

doc.: ieee 802.11-11/0224r0 submission march 2011 bruce kraemer (marvell)slide 1 wg11 snapshot march...

Documents