doc.: ieee 802.11-09/0715r9 submission september 2009 stephen mccann (rim), bruce kraemer (marvell)...

September 2009

Stephen McCann (RIM), Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission

P802.11u Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot

Authors:

Name Affiliation Address Phone email

Stephen McCannResearch in

Motion200 Bath Road, Slough,

Berks, SL1 3XE, UK+44 1753 667099

[email protected]

Bruce Kraemer Marvell5488 Marvell Lane,

Santa Clara, CA 95054+1 (321) 427-4098

[email protected]

Slide 1

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission

Introduction

• This document contains the report to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee showing that P802.11u has met the conditional requirements to proceed to sponsor ballot.

• The fifth recirculation ballot on TGu draft 8.0 (LB156) yielded a new Disapprove vote, and 5 new required comments associated with Disapprove votes.

• Subsequent discussions in TGu resulted in the withdrawal of these new required comments.

• The conditions for conditional approval under Clause 13 of the LMSC Operations Manual have been met.– This explained in more detail on slides 3-10 of this presentation.

• This document (11-09-0715r9) was approved during the closing plenary session of the 802.11 working group on 25 Sep 2009.– Passed in the Task Group yes , no , abstain – Passed in the Working Group yes , no , abstain

Slide 2

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission

Sponsor Ballot Conditions (1)

• a) Recirculation ballot is completed. Generally, the recirculation ballot and resolution should occur in accordance with the schedule presented at the time of conditional approval.

• Answer: recirculation ballot LB156 completed on August 18, 2009, according to the schedule presented in 11-09-0715r9 (slide #16)

Slide 3

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission


• b) After resolution of the recirculation ballot is completed, the approval percentage is at least 75% and there are no new valid DISAPPROVE votes.

• Condition met: The approval percentage is 93%. There was 1 new valid DISAPPROVE vote. Following discussions in TGu, the voter’s single required comment was changed to not required (see email on slide #5). There were no comments which requested the TGu to change the draft in any way. Therefore the intent of the condition has been met.

Slide 4

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission

• -----Original Message-----From: Liwen CHU [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 22 September 2009 09:14To: Stephen McCannSubject: RE: LB156 - IEEE 802.11u Draft 8.0 Comments

• Hi Stephen,

• Yes, I can change my comment to "T".

• Best Regards

• Liwen

• -----Original Message-----

• From: Stephen McCann [mailto:[email protected]]

• Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 6:47 PM

• To: [email protected]

• Subject: LB156 - IEEE 802.11u Draft 8.0 Comments

• Liwen,

• TGu is currently addressing comments from LB156 and notes that you have 1 technical required "TR" comment. TGu currently has 4 "TR" comments and 1 "ER" comment.

• To allow TGu to progress to sponsor ballot, would you be willing to change your comment to "T", so that it is no longer a "TR".

• Thanks

September 2009

Slide 5

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission


• c) No technical changes, as determined by the WG Chair, were made as a result of the recirculation ballot.

• Answer: The comment resolutions in the last recirculation did not approve any changes to the draft.

Slide 6

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission


• d) No new valid DISAPPROVE comments on new issues that are not resolved to the satisfaction of the submitter from existing DISAPPROVE voters.

• Answer: There were initially 4 new required comments from 1 existing DISAPPROVE voter. These were subsequently changed to “not required” by the voter (see email on slide #8). The resolution of these comments found in 11-09-0940r7, did not result in any change to the draft.

Slide 7

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission

• -----Original Message-----From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]

• Sent: 22 September 2009 03:28

• To: Stephen McCann

• Subject: Re: LB156 - IEEE 802.11u Draft 8.0 comments

• Yes I am okay with this.

• Alastair Malarky

• -----Original Message-----

• "Stephen McCann" <[email protected]>

• 09/21/2009 09:51 PM To <[email protected]>

• Subject LB156 - IEEE 802.11u Draft 8.0 comments

•

• Alastair,

• TGu is currently addressing comments from LB156 and notes that

• you have 3 technical required "TR" comment and 1 editorial required "ER"

• comment. In total TGu currently has 4 "TR" comments and 1 "ER" comment.

• To allow TGu to progress to sponsor ballot, would you be willing to

• change your comments to "T" and "E", so they are no longer "required?"

• Thanks

September 2009

Slide 8

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission


• e) If the WG Chair determines that there is a new invalid DISAPPROVE comment or vote, the WG Chair shall promptly provide details to the Sponsor.

• Answer: There were no new invalid DISAPPROVE comments or votes.

Slide 9

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission

Sponsor Ballot Conditions (6)• f) The WG Chair shall immediately report the results of the ballot

to the Sponsor including: the date the ballot closed, vote tally and comments associated with any remaining disapproves (valid and invalid), the WG responses and the rationale for ruling any vote invalid.

• The ballot closed on: August 18, 2009.

• The vote tally is: Approve 148, Disapprove 11, Abstain 35.

• The remaining unsatisfied comments associated with any remaining Disapprove votes are attached here:

Slide 10

11-09-1060-00-000u-required-comments-sum

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission

802.11 WG Letter Ballot Results – P802.11u

BallotID

Ballot Close Date

Title BallotType Pool Return %RtnAbstai

n%Abs Approve

Disapprove

%Approve

132 12 July 2008

Technical Letter Ballot for IEEE 802.11u_D3.0

Technical 213 182 85.5 35 19.2 113 34 76.9

137 08 October

2008

Recirculation Letter Ballot for IEEE 802.11u_D4.0

Recirculation 213 189 88.7 37 19.6 118 34 77.6

142 20 February

2009


Recirculation 213 191 89.7 39 20.4 125 27 82.2

148 24 April 2009


Recirculation 213 192 90.1 35 18.2 142 15 90.4

152 19 June 2009


Recirculation 213 194 91.0 33 17.0 142 19 88.2

156 18 Aug 2009


Recirculation 213 194 91.0 35 18.0 148 11 93

Slide 11

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission

802.11 WG Letter Ballot Comments – P802.11u

Ballot IDBallot

Close DateTitle Ballot Type

Number of Comments received

132 12 July 2008Technical Letter Ballot for TGu Draft 3.0

Technical 944 (525 T, 419 E)

137 8 Oct 2008Recirculation Letter Ballot for TGu Draft 4.0

Recirculation 871 (487 T, 384 E)

142 20 Feb 2009Second Recirculation Ballot for TGu Draft 5.0


14824 April

2009Third Recirculation Ballot for TGu Draft 6.0


152 19 Jun 2009Fourth Recirculation Ballot for TGu Draft 7.0


156 18 Aug 2009Fifth Recirculation Ballot for TGu Draft 8.0


Slide 12

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission Stephen McCann (RIM), Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

Unsatisfied comments by commenterVoter1 LB132 LB137 LB142 LB148 LB152 LB156 Total

Gabor Bajko 15 15

Clint Chaplin 1 20 21

Peter Ecclesine 4 4

Darwin Engwer 2 2

Tom Kolze 2 3 1 2 1 9

Alastair Malarky 8 8

Henry Ptasinski 17 10 4 31

Richard Roy 6 6

Dorothy Stanley 4 1 10 15

Alexander Tolpin 1 1

George Vlantis 2 2 3

Qi Wang 6 6

Total 25 13 5 5 73 0 121

Slide 13

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission

Unsatisfied Comments – Topics

Topic #Comments

Interworking 15

Generic Advertisement Service 44

Subscription Provider Interface 15

Emergency Services 11

Editorial 28

Other 10

Total 121

Slide 14

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission

Unsatisfied comments

• The composite of all unsatisfied comments and the resolutions approved by the comment resolution committee received during working group ballot may be found in the embedded document on the right:

– 11-09-1060r0

• A copy of this same data presented using MyBallot access database report format is attached.

– Double click on the icon to the right to open this.

Adobe Acrobat Document

Slide 15

11-09-1060-00-000u-required-comments-sum

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0715r9

Submission

TGu Timeline Open Close

Fifth recirculation (TGu draft 8.0) 3-Aug-09 18-Aug-09

Pool formation 17-Aug-09 1-Oct-09

First sponsor ballot 21-Oct-09 20-Nov-09

Second sponsor ballot 31-Jan-10 15-Feb-10

Third sponsor ballot 17-Mar-10 2-Apr-10

Fourth sponsor ballot 1-May-10 16-May-10

EC to RevCom Mar-10 (cond.) or Jul-10

RevCom to SB Sep-10

Slide 16

doc.: ieee 802.11-09/0715r9 submission september 2009 stephen mccann (rim), bruce kraemer (marvell)...

Documents