DIVISION OF CITY SCHOOLSCity of Mandaluyong

Division Plan for CY 2013

Type of Learners:

- In-school:- 33,859 Elementary/kinder- 18,193 Secondary- 174 Elem. SPED- 21 Sec. SPED - 3,027 Jose Fabella Memorial School (Special School)

PROBLEM ANALYSIS

The secondary schools have a PCR of 64.67 which means that it does not meet R.A. 7880, schools with severe shortage of classrooms.

The PCR of Elem. Schools is 54.15 which means that it does not meet the R.A. 7880 even with double shifting.

ACCESS

GER (Elem.) has increased to 88.38 in 2011, however it is below the PDP target of 108.27%.

GER (HS) has increased to 81.32 in 2011 , however it is below the PDP target of 86.86.

Causes:• In the elementary the enrolment of the entire

Division increased from 29,923 to 31,308 (2009-2011).

• The enrolment for secondary schools increased from 16,270 to 17,857 (2009-2011)

• A significant number of learners are enrolled in Private Schools and public schools in nearby divisions.

• Transfer of learners to other public schools in nearby divisions and provinces

Strategies:• Request to the LGU Executives for the

construction of medium rise building in Andres Bonifacio Integrated School and Jose Fabella Memorial School with buildable space.

• Establishment of new School Annexes and Integrated Schools(1 elem. School and 1 Integrated School)

• Conduct of school mapping to determine the school-age children.

• Conduct of advocacy campaigns.

ACCESS

QUALITY

• Increase/decrease of NAT MPS for elementary has been erratic in the last three years and way below the 75% National MPS target.

NAT for the last 3 Years (Elementary)SCHOOL YEAR

MATHEMATICS ENGLISH SCIENCE FILIPINO HEKASI MPS

2009-2010 46.64 56.35 50.91 69.95 56.1155.9

9

2010-2011 53.35 55.15 49.55 71.79 59.0457.7

7

2011-2012 46.54 53.66 52.64 61.30 51.1753.0

6

MATHEMAT-ICS

ENGLISH SCIENCE FILIPINO HEKASI MPS0

1020304050607080

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

MATHEMAT-ICS

ENGLISH SCIENCE FILIPINO HEKASI MPS0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2009-20102010-20112011-2012

NAT for the last 3 Years (Secondary)School Year MATHEMATICS ENGLISH SCIENCE FILIPINO HEKASI

Critical Thinking MPS

2009-2010 36.66 48.83 41.84 60.55 38.82

45.34

2010-2011 39.81 50.61 38.86 64.26 53.60 49.462011-2012 42.62 52.92 39.12 52.34 55.08 51.65 48.81

QUALITY

• Increase/decrease of NAT MPS for secondary has been erratic in the last three years and way below the 75% National MPS target.

Causes:

• Low reading performance as manifested in Phil-IRI results.• Teacher competence and capacity in managing different types of

learners, innovative teaching style and strategies and curricular reforms.

• Frequent suspension of classes due to heavy rains and typhoons• Existence of 2 shifts in all schools divisions in some schools

divisions • Overlapping of extra-curricular activities across levels (attending

trainings, workshops, celebrations, contests and meetings)• Frequent floodings and other geophysical problems in four

schools.• Instructional supervisory style/strategies of School Heads and

Supervisors.• Absence for Incentive and Award System for high performing

learners

QUALITY

Strategies:• Roll out of PASBE - SBM ACCESs • Implementation of K to12 Curriculum• Implementation of strategic reading program in all schools.• Identification of least mastered skills in NAT and provide appropriate learning

activities for remediation/reinforcement • Enhancement of Assessment/Testing Program of the Division and Schools • Effective and efficient implementation of the K-12 Curriculum and other reforms• Development of learning modules as a catch-up instruction during suspension of

classes/ holding of make-up Saturday classes. • Establishment of additional Special Science Elementary Schools• Enhancement of library hubs, eClassrooms and ICT Integration in teaching.• Creation of the learning resource portal (division and school websites)• Regulation of Co-Curricular activities for learners and add-on tasks for teachers

division heads, supervisors and principals.• Capability building programs for instructional managers, school heads and teachers. • Launching of Incentive and Award System for High Performing Learners

QUALITY

EFFICIENCY

• Elem. Schools have an insignificant drop-out rate for the last three year ranging from 0.67% to .0.49% whereas HS have a range of 5.95% to 2.13%. It can be noted that Elem. and HS have decreasing drop-out rate for the last three years.

• Completion Rate for both elementary and secondary is below the PDP target. (93.8% elem. and 77.97% HS)

• CSR for both elem. and HS is above the PDP targets.

Causes:

• Frequent floodings and other geophysical problems.

• Teacher competence and capacity in managing different types of learners, innovative teaching style and strategies and curricular reforms

• High cost of living resulting to irregular attendance of learners.

• Parental involvement

EFFICIENCY

Strategies:• Convergence with barangay and LGU officials.• Launching of Eco-Savers Program• Institutionalization of Greening Program.• Implementation of Disaster and Risk Reduction Program. • Capability building programs for teachers. • Establishment of additional Open High Schools.• Effective and efficient implementation of the K-12 Curriculum and

other reforms• Increasing the number of beneficiaries for the Feeding Program.• Strict adherence to no collection policy and regulations on the

requirements of school projects and other co-curricular activities.• Institutionalization of parents support system/Guidance and

counseling services to learners.• Maintain Medical and Health Services to less privilege learners.• Recommend additional beneficiaries for the 4Ps Program.• Widen coverage of relevant ALS Livelihood Programs. • Request for additional slots for GASTPE grantees

EFFICIENCY

GOVERNANCE• Absence of Plantilla Items for administrative and financial staff of the

Division Office and Schools. • Full implementation of eBEIS, LIS. However, some ICT Support

systems like LRMDS and AMS are still to be implemented. • Information dissemination process with in the division needs

upgrading.• Absence of permanent ADR committees in the division and schools.• The division is only on the start up stage of the implementation

Child Protection Policy.• School Audit Team is no yet in placed. • Preparation of Work and Financial Plan and Annual Procurement

Plan is for compliance only• Incentive and award system for School heads, supervisors,

teachers and non-teaching personnel needs enhancement.• Consultative and Support System between and among DepEd

Officials, Local School Board and Congressional Office is very evident.

• Division office has no authority to create and fill plantilla items• Continuing support funds for internet connections not sustained• LRMDS and AMS implementation is still on process.• Resistance to change and slow adaptability of division and school

officials and personnel ICT-enhanced processes.• Low level of awareness on ADR law and processes• Central Office had just released the DepEd Order on Child

Protection Policy• Low level of awareness on the significance of School Audit Teams• Low level of expertise in the preparation of Work and Financial Plan

and Annual Procurement Plan• Incentive and award system is not well publicized

Causes:GOVERNANCE

Strategies:• Wait patiently for the approval of the Rationalization Plan • Request authority to fill for vacant non-teaching items• Include allocation of the salaries of Guards/ Utility Workers / Clerks

of the division office and schools in the SEF budget. • Follow strictly the calendar of the implementation of LRMDS and

AMS• Utilization of the Division website for the paperless info

dissemination, transactions, and reports. • Conduct capability building for ADR and Accounting and Auditing

Processes, Rules and Regulations among the division and school officials and concerned teachers.

• Conduct of Orientation on DepEd on Child Protection Policy.• Retrain division and school officials on the preparation of Work and

Financial Plan and Annual Procurement Plan• Convene the division and school Incentive and Awards Committees• Continuous interfacing between and among the DepEd Officials,

Local School Board and Congressional Office.

GOVERNANCE

• Expand and improve participation and absorptive capacity of all schools and learning centers (ACCESS & EFFICIENCY)

• Achieve proficiency level of performance in all learning areas/strands for all levels (QUALITY)

• Ensure that the learning competencies are responsive to the fast-changing environment (QUALITY)

• Ensure synergy of support systems in the management of educational services (GOVERNANCE)

GOALS

OBJECTIVES:

• Increased GER, NER, AIR, NIR by 2% - 5% from the previous year

• Increased MPS in NAT by 2% - 5%• Increased CSR, CR & GR by 2% - 5%• Decreased SDR, SLR, Failure & Repetition

Rates to 0.5% in the elementary level and to 2% in the secondary level

• Increased efficiency in management and operations (frontline services and other related functions)

GOALS

CY2013 Programs/Activities/ProjectsMFO 1.

1 K – 12 Basic Education Program

2 Assessment/Testing Program

3 Kinder Education for all 5 year kids

4 Mother Tongue-Based Multi-Lingual Education (MTB-MLE)

5 Special Science Elementary School

6 ESEP

7 SPED

8 Special Schools

9 Open High Schools10 ICT Enhanced Instruction

11 eClassrooms

12 Dynamic Leaning Program conceptualized by the Bernidos of Bohol

13 Voch-Tech Schools

14 Strategic Reading Program

15 Values Formation Program

16 Campus Journalism

17 Sports Development

18 Scouting Program

19 Journalism Program

20 MTAP Program

22 Alternative Delivery Mode (ADM) in Formal Basic Education

23 ALS Basic Literacy and Livelihood Program

24 School Health and Nutrition Program

25 Child – Friendly School Program

26 Opening of Annex School and Integrated School

27 Special Program for the Arts

28 Special Program for Foreign Languages

29 Upgrading of Science Laboratory Room ,Facilities and Speech Laboratory

30 Reproduction of modules for K-12 /OHS/ALS

31 Revitalized Guidance Program for Secondary Schools

32 Guro Ko, Patnubay Ko Counselling Program

33 Incentive and award system for high performing learners

MFO 2.

1Capability building program for school heads and supervisors on Instructional Leadership, Financial Management and Legal Procedures and ALS Programs.

2 Capability building program for teachers on Strategies and Content, ICT enhanced instruction and Child Protection

3 Capability building program for School Audit Teams, ADR Teams and Child Protection Committee.

4 Development and enhancement of Division Website

5 Advocacy campaigns on various programs and projects

6 Accreditation of elem. and sec. schools (PASBE)

7 SBM ACCESs

8 Interfacing with Local School Board and Congressional Office

9 National Greening Program / Disaster Risk Reduction Programs

10 Eco-savers Program

11

Incentive and award system for division officials, school heads, teachers and non-teaching personnel 12. Hiring of Legal Consultant

MFO 3.1

Standardization and recognition of Private Schools

2Orientation – Workshop on LIS Implementation

3Capability building program for School heads and Teachers on K-12 BEC

Budget AllocationFUND 2010 2011 2012

SEF 295,000,000 295,000,000 300,000,000

GAA 377,602,000 434,615,000 460,022,000

Total 672,602,000 729,615,000 760, 022,000