division of city schools city of mandaluyong

Free Powerpoint Templates

Division of City Schools

City of Mandaluyong

FY 2014 Plan and Budget


Our Location

Located at the approximate geographical centre of Metro Manila, Mandaluyong City is called "Tiger City of the Philippines", "Metro Manila's Heart", and the "Shopping Mall Capital of the Philippines. Its population is approximately 331,944.

It is the 2nd smallest city in the Philippines.


VISION

By 2018, DepED Mandaluyong is recognized for good governance and for developing learners endowed with life skills and strength of character.


DepED Mandaluyong is committed to engage and collaborate with stakeholders for the provision of quality learning outcomes for all types of clients. Core Values

Integrity Leadership Collaboration

MISSION


GOALS Provide quality and accessible curricular

engagement

Provide leadership in the implementation of K to 12 Program

Create learner-centered environment for all types of clients

Build a community of educators equipped with the highest sense of professionalism and accountability

Work in partnership with stakeholders in the attainment of common aspirations


Basic InputsBasic Inputs

Schools: Elementary - 17Secondary – 10

•5 Integrated Schools•1 Special Science Elementary School(DPCGES)•1 Engineering and Science Education Program (ESEP)(MPNAG)•1 Special Science High School (CMSHS) •1 National Special School with 13 Units (JFMS)


BASIC INPUTS

Classroom - 858: Elementary (570) – 1:52.79Secondary (288) – 1:60.54

Teachers – 1,445: Elementary (817) – 1:37.78 Secondary (628) – 1:29.66

Non Teaching - 407: National (81) Local (326)


BASIC INPUTS

Seats – 34,673: Elementary(25,370) – 1:1.22Secondary (12,916) – 1:1.44

Textbooks – 291,550: Elementary (204,961) – 1:0.79 Secondary (86,589) – 1:0.69


External Analysis Matrix


Area DATA OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

E

C

O

N

O

M

I

C

9,821 New Business Registrants

4 billion increase of income in business

18.38% increase business income in 2012

35 total giant companies/investors (111. 45 B Projected Revenue)

Php 95 million for housing ( 549 families beneficiaries) projected household pop 339,769

Mandaluyong City has its own share of factories and industries and a central business district. Hence, higher revenues.

More new investments rising along Shaw Boulevard

More funds for school support on infrastructures, facilities and other services

Descent housing for the community , hence, better and healthy home environment for the learners



E

C

O

N

O

M

I

C

1,124.97 ha land area is 1.77% of the 636 sq km total land area of Metro Manila

Approx. 100 ha of Welfare Ville Compound is open and unproductive land area

Income classification : First Class

Available space for construction of Athletic/Playground/Multi-Purpose Facilities or School Buildings

Economically vibrantOpportunity for

possible financial support for the school through business establishments.

Limitation in expansion for economic and educational activities.

Limited buildable space for school and other important school facilities

Prone for informal settling and squatting thus, result to congestion and high turn-over of migrant learners


S

O

C

I

A

L

1 SUC, 31 basic education private schools, 3 private universities, computer schools, night school

(20 )CCTV Cameras in Strategic Areas

(1) Central Emergency Command and Control Center Office

(3) Base communication network connecting all emergency response department

9 of 27 barangays are thickly populated with increasing migration rate

Project TEACH for Inclusive Education-Galing Pook Awardee

Potential partners for K to 12 and other educational endeavour

Low crime rate due to the presence of peace and order facilities and infrastructure

Ensured safety environment among school children

Strong support for SPED children

More chances of occurrence of pupil/ student at risk



S

O

C

I

A

L

100 plus major stakeholders and benefactors; about 100 non-government organizations

Every Saturday Pamahalaan sa Pamayanan ( Provision of eyeglasses; relief goods, wheelchairs, etc)

Yearly cultural and tourism activities (PASKUHAN SA Tiger City; Labandero Festival, etc.)

Potential linkages with private stakeholders (Greenfield District, Phil-Asia Foundation, Kabisig-Kalahi, Sea Oil Phils, Rotary Club) and organizations.

Families of school children are direct beneficiaries of the services

Opportunities for poor families and small –scale businessmen and entrepreneur to earn

Revenues channelled to Child-Friendly Projects of the city

Non- regulation of school participation resulting to disruption of classes



S

O

C

I

A

L

Awardee:

Twice NCR Awardee as Most Child -Friendly City

2011 Presidential National awardee for Most Child Friendly City

2010 Nutrition Awardee (Green Banner Award Hall- Famer)

Best Quality of Life Awardee according to AIM

All 27 barangays have functional health centers, a City Medical Center, Lying-in Maternity Hospital and 3 private hospitals; Ciara Marie Foundation.

Conducive for business and other economic activities and peaceful living condition.

Improved educational services

More health services and benefits are addressed especially in the grass root level in the community



AREAS DATA OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

P

O

L

I

T

I

C

A

L

(2) Major political parties : Liberal; Lakas-Campi)

About 100 non-government organizations

Congressman /majority floor leader

Major leaders of the city have good working relationship

Political harmony among politicians and LGUs despite different political persuasion hence, strong LGU to various programs and projects for schools

Freedom to organize is observed

A number of NGOs can be tapped for the programs like Adopt a School Program

More opportunities to fund major projects/ constructions related to schools

Both the Mayor and Congressman are charismatic leaders that promote child friendly programs for conducive learning environments

Different political persuasion of few barangay leaders may result to compromise school support


AREAS DATA OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

P

O

L

I

T

I

C

A

L

E2G2 – for efficient and ethical good governance

Rank 1 in fastest process in approving property registration

(326) city-paid personnel deployed in school

Provide efficient and effective governance or government services. Breakthrough in local governance. (“All information you want at your finger tips”)

School related Information are easily accessible and relevant.

Information can be utilized for effective strategic planning of the school.

More investment and revenues to come which means increase of income in the city that redound to accessible educational resources .

Available support staff of the schools

Information gathered through the system maybe used for personal gain or interest.

Mismatched deployment of city-paid personnel


E

C

O

L

O

G

I

C

A

L

(11) Barangays with Waste Management through Materials Recovery Facilities

Mandaluyong is situated along EDSA

4th City in the world to use Lithium Battery Operated E-Trikes

Create by-products for economic benefits of families of school children : (BIODIESEL PROGRAM and ORGANIC FERTILIZER )

Less populated service roads in the city and comfortable transport mode for school children

The City is situated along central EDSA which exposes the population to pollution

Improper disposal of busted lithium batteries can be a health hazard

AREADATA OPPORTUNITIES THREATS


E

C

O

L

O

G

I

C

A

L

Partially flat on its southwest; mostly rolling with gentle rocky slopes in the rest of the area; with lowest point lies in inland that cause flooding;

Underground canal along San Francisco Street with Flood Pumping Station

The land area is only 1124.97 ha.

Soil formation is conducive for construction of high-rise buildings and multi storey school buildings.

Quick subsiding of flood water

Five (5) barangays (including City Hall compound) are easily floodedFour (4) schools are along the creek and the Pasig River

Limited ecological programs like tree planting or other greening activities

AREADATA OPPORTUNITIES THREATS



T

E

C

H

N

O

L

O

G

I

C

A

L

E2G2 Database System (Citizen’s Database)

(50 ) Centers Business Process Out Sourcing

(21) schools have WIFI/internet connectivity; all government offices with communication facilities available; at least one of each household has mobile phone

Political leaders are technology-savvy

“All City information needed at your fingertips”

Employment opportunities for on-the job training accessibility

Wide access of WIFI/Internet connectivity

Facilitate quick and efficient communication among the school personnel/departments

Easy access of information among the schools children and personnel

Strong support of local leaders to school ICT programs and projects

It is am online system that might be prone to hacking and other cyber crimes.

Unregulated operation of gaming centers, internet café, social network site and other multi media devices are distractions to students

Cyber-bullying Unregulated access to content

and sites in the internet

Source: 2012 State of the City Address of Honorable Mayor Benjamin C. Abalos, Jr.


Internal Analysis Matrix


AreaArea DataData StrengthStrength WeaknessesWeaknesses

Basic Inputs

Teacher: Pupil ratio

Teachers’ Profile

Elementary (817) – 1:37.78

Secondary (628) – 1:29.66

50% of teachers (high knowledge but low attitude)104 Elem and 79 HS teachers (low attitude and low knowledge)

The teacher-pupil ratio has improved for the last 3 years. It’s within the national planning standard.

•Based on the profile of teachers as to knowledge, competency, commitment and attitude 50% of the teachers belong to the high knowledge but low attitude and sad to say that 104 elem. teachers and 79 H.S teachers have low attitude and low knowledge

•The division will strive to develop a more comprehensive assessment profiling tool for teachers and side by side redesign training programs based on assessment results.


AreaArea DataData StrengthsStrengths WeaknessesWeaknessesStudent: Classroom

Elementary (570) – 1:52.79

Secondary (288) – 1:60.54

(1)Integrated School to open , June 2013(Legislated)

(1)Elem School to open in 2014(legislated)

(7) Elem. Schools have I shift classes and (4) H.S.

50% of the HS have speech lab,100% of the schools have computer lab, and science lab

The Division has school building program based on requirements and needs. Majority of the classrooms are within specifications/standards.

Additional integrated school will open by June, 2013 and (1) elementary school is set to open June, 2014.

Eleven schools have one shift classes.

Students have opportunities for hand-on application of learnings. It can be added that a good number of schools have either speech lab, computer lab or science lab.

Some classrooms intended for instruction are utilized for other purposes with the aim of improving ancillary services (e.g. guidance, clinic, library and canteens). However, management does not allow 3 shift in any of the schools


AreaArea DataData StrengthStrength WeaknessesWeaknesses

Pupil: Seat

Elementary (25,370) 1:1.22

Secondary (12,916)– 1:1.44

Student-seat ratio is within planning standards and based on needs.

In the elementary level there is a need to strengthen the maintenance and safekeeping of furniture since the figure in 2011-2012 has decreased the ratio to 1:1.44

No provision for left-handed students

Textbooks

Elem: 1:079HS: 1: 0.69

The figures show that textbook pupil ratio is almost 1:1 and all textbooks are approved by IMCS. These are supplemented by references and workbooks procured by the local school board.

The division has a functional library hub.

The schools have to improve their own library holdings and facilities.


Area Data Strength Weaknesses

WatsanPupil: Toilet Ratio

Elem:66.28:1HS: 74.40:1

There is an on going construction and repair of toilets in 8 schools. The facilities are compliant with to specifications/standards. Water supply is ensured for toilets and lavatories. Drinking water is provided by MWSS.Hand washing areas are available.

Watsan facilities do not meet the standard ratio . The Division does not accept 1-storey toilet facilities due to lack of buildable space. However, all buildings have provisions for WatSan Facilities.


Area Data Strengths Weaknesses

Gross Enrolment Rate

Elem: 116.72%HS: 120.17%

Gross Enrolment Rate - indicates that there are students who are either underage or over-age across all grade/year levels. It implies that there is a significant number of repeaters, ‘balik-paaralan’, transferees in both levels. Efforts must be exerted to ensure survival of learners during the year and that they should not leave school without completing learning cycle.

Net Enrolment Rate

Elem:99.62HS: 89.95

Net Enrolment Rate – Almost all school-age children are in school in elementary level.

However, in high school, almost 11% are not in school. It implies that learning environment is not so attractive to high school students to remain. However, they should not be neglected. Thus, alternative learning system should be considered in the planning of the school program and projects. Furthermore, the division has 5 schools catering to the need of 412 Non-Graded SPED learners which is supported by Project TEACH. This project is funded by the local school board.



AccessGross /Apparent Intake Rate

130.65 %Apparent Intake Rate indicates that there are students who are either underage or overage in Grade I. It means that a significant number of students are repeaters and entered school at an older age. The underage are near below the cut-off date.

Since there are repeaters there’s a need to look into the competencies of grade I teachers as well as the readiness of the 6 year old kids.

Net Intake Rate

67.09% Net Intake Rate is below the planning standard and has been erratic for three years. This implies that there should be more effort to capture or arrest the school-age children to enter school within the age level. Like the grade I level, the figure implies there are also repeaters in grade 2 to 6. Hence, there is a need to look into the various factors that may affect learning.



QualityNAT 3, 6, 4th

The NAT achievement level in Grade 3, Grade 6 and Fourth Year are: 41.74; 53.06 and 48.81. MPS are all below the national standard of 75%.

Subjects taught in English have the lowest MPS. English Reading and Grammar have the lowest achievement rate in Grade 3. It means that the reading proficiency level is not satisfactory. In grade 6 , mathematics got the lowest MPS. Most probably math is the least preferred subject among students and/or teachers need to improve mathematics instruction.

It can now be seen that one of major factors affecting the quality of learning is the level of knowledge, competence, attitude and commitment of teachers.



Proficiency

Cohort Survival Rate

Elem: 100.00HS: 92.87

Elementary cohort survival attained 100%CSR is increasing over the past three years

Completion Rate

Elem: 99.42HS: 89.32

Elementary completion rate has improved

Completion rate in secondary has to be improved

School Leaver Rate

Elem: 0.10HS: 2.97

For the last three years, the elementary school leaver is decreasing

School leaver rate for secondary needs to be worked out


1. Curriculum The schools are using the 2002 Basic Education Curriculum . Teachers are used to follow the standardized curriculum rather than the customizing it to the needs and interest of the learners. A. Instruction/ Methodology

Based on supervisory reports of principals and supervisors, most of the teachers are using teacher-centered learning approaches rather than child-centered. In Pilot sections teachers are using ICT Enhanced Instruction. It can be assumed that teacher-centered learning approaches contributed to the low performance level of the school children

B. Learning Resources

The schools have access to different kinds of resources like books, general references, workbooks and other teaching devices and equipment as revealed in the inventory of properties. However, teachers have to be encouraged to use of the available resources in the library hub and laboratories without fear of damages and losses.

C. Learning Environment

Since classrooms are of standard size and classroom pupil ratio is ideal the learning environment is considered conducive. Classroom are equipped with light and air ventilation facilities. School grounds are well-kept because of the availability of utility and maintenance workers deployed by the LGU.

Others


ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Position Items Remarks

Schools Division Superintendent 1

Out of 27 public schools, 19 Principals are full-pledge principals and 3 are OIC Head teachers. The age bracket of these school officials is between 40 to 64 years old and all are holders of Masters Degree and /or Doctoral Degree. It can be noted that 10 principals have an experience of 1 to 5 years of management and leadership positions.

Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

1

Educational Program Supervisors 9

Public School District Supervisor 2

Principals/Head Teachers 21

Administrative Officer V 1

Human Resource Management Officer

1 (OIC)

Planning Officer II 1

Records Office II 1

Accountant I 1

Cashier II 1

Administrative Assistant III 1 (1 Vacant)

Administrative Aide IV 6

Administrative Aide I 8 (1 Vacant)

Public Health Nurses 5 (1 Vacant)

Security 2 (1Vacant)


Organizations. The Division has a recognized PTA, Teachers and Non-teaching Federations, Principals and Supervisors organizations. These are holding meetings regularly with the Division head as an adviser.

System Mechanism. Division Personnel Selection Board and the Division Bids and Award Committee are in placed, however there is a need to hire a legal consultant and organize an internal audit system.

Management Systems. Adoption of automated data-based systems like, EBEIS,HRIS, AMIS,LRMDS, FMIS, eNGAS are partially installed.

SEF. The annual SEF budget is readily available however, there must be an alignment of priorities and allocation.

Challenges. The biggest challenge faced by the division is to enhance harmonious relationship among key officials and personnel. Efforts of reconciliation are slowly taking place. We would like to believe that it’s not our differences that divide us but it is our judgement about each other.


AWARDS AND RECOGNITION

The Division has been winning in school curricular activities like in sports, journalism, science and mathematics .The schools are also active in school programs and other cultural activities. However, the challenge is to balance all gains to a better learning outcome as measured by the National Achievement Tests (NAT).


S-O (How can strengths be employed to take advantage of the opportunities) 1.Partnership with local government and private business owners, Rotary Club/civic/people organization for better resource programming ( for classroom facilities, seats, toilets, textbooks, etc) 2.Enhancement of human development support system on new trends in learning for instructional leaders 3.Customization of teachers’ training 4.Creation of more attractive learning environment to add value

W-O (How can weaknesses be overcome to take advantage of or exploit the opportunities 1.Collaboration with local government for capability development of teachers and for performance-based incentives as rewards 2.Operationalization of Grass-root based initiatives of all schools for instructional support system 3.Expansion of coverage for ALS programs 4.Linkage with businesses and industries for tech-voc specialization/courses in preparation to K to 12 (grades 11 and 12) 5.Enhancement of SBM practices with stakeholders 6.Installation of results-based performance management system by linking it to local school board

S-T (How can strengths be used to counteract threats in order to take advantage/exploit the opportunities?)1.Exploitation of available ICT facilities in every school2.Enhancement of digital literacy among teachers3.Provision of Alternative Delivery Mode of learning, e.g. Open High School; and Tech-Voc specialized courses in every secondary school.4.Enhancement of human resources deployed by the local school board 5.Enhancement of non-partisan division and school leadership for harmonious relationship with barangay officials

W-T (How can weaknesses be overcome to counteract threats and take advantage the opportunities?)1.Rationalization of the utilization of SEF budget;2.Redefining of collaboration framework with LGU’s, NGO’s and other interest groups;3.Collaboration with private schools for the roll-out of K to 124.Improvement of data-based management systems5.Operationalization of competency assessment and profiling of teachers to address performance gaps6.Enhancement of learner-centered materials through school board and congressional initiative

The SWOT MatrixSTRATEGIC OPTIONS


INDICATOR2011

(Actual)2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Ave % inc. to

meet the target

2016 PDP

Target

ELEMENTARYGross/Apparent Intake Rate

Region 121.29% 117.03% 112.78% 108.52% 104.26% 100.00% -4.26% Mandaluyong 130.65 126.39 122.13 117.87 113.61 100 -4.26

Net Intake RateRegion 62.04% 69.63% 77.23% 84.82% 92.41% 100.00% 7.59% Mandaluyong 67.09 69.75 77.50 85.00 92.50 100

Indicative Division Targets


Region 104.25% 105.40% 106.55% 107.70% 108.85% 110.00% 1.15%

Mandaluyong 116.72 117.72% 118.72% 119.72 120.72 121.72 1.00

Net Enrolment Rate

Region 90.72% 92.57% 94.43% 96.29% 98.14% 100.00% 1.86% 100.00%

Mandaluyong 99.62 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%


INDICATOR2011

(Actual)2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Ave % inc. to

meet the target

2016 PDP

Target

ELEMENTARY

Cohort Survival RateRegion 86.26% 88.61% 89.96% 90.00% 95.00% 98.00% 2.35% 86.76%

Mandaluyong 100 100 100 100 100 100 0.49

Completion RateRegion 83.06% 85.45% 87.84% 90.22% 92.00% 95.00% 2.39%

Mandaluyong 99.42 100 100 100 100 100.

School Leaver RateRegion 2.93% 2.35% 1.76% 1.17% 0.59% 0.00% -0.59%

Mandaluyong 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.01



INDICATOR2011

(Actual)2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Ave % inc. to meet the

target

2016 PDP

Target

SECONDARY


Region 98.43% 98.74% 99.06% 99.37% 99.69% 100.00% 0.31%

Mandaluyong 120.17 120.48 121.1 121.42 121.72 100.00% 0.31

Net Enrolment Rate

Region 78.00% 81.00% 84.00% 87.00% 90.00% 93.00% 3.00% 93.34%

Mandaluyong89.95 92.95 95.95 98.95 100 100 3.00



INDICATOR2011

(Actual)2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


target

2016 PDP

Target

SECONDARY

Cohort Survival RateRegion 84.47% 85.58% 86.68% 87.79% 87.00% 90.00% 1.11% 83.91%

Mandaluyong 92.87 93.98 95.09 96.20 97.31 98.42 1.11%

Completion RateRegion 79.08% 81.26% 83.45% 85.63% 86.00% 90.00% 2.18%

Mandaluyong 89.32 91.50 93.68 95.86 98.04 100 2.18 School Leaver Rate

Region 5.77% 4.91% 4.06% 3.21% 2.00% 1.50% -0.85%

Mandaluyong 2.97 2.67 2.37 2.07 1.77 1.47 0.30



NAT Division Indicative Targets by Subject Area

Subject Area2011

(Actual)2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


target

2016 PDP Target

READING ENGLISH - Grade 3Region 42.8 49.24 55.68 62.12 68.56 75.00 6.44 75.00Mandaluyong 38.92 49.25 55.69 62.50 68.60 75 75.00

READING FILIPINO - Grade 3 Region 50.68 55.54 60.41 65.27 70.14 75.00 4.86 75.00Mandaluyong 46.18 55.80 61.00 65.50 70.50 75 75.00

ENGLISH GRAMMAR - Grade 3 Region 42.07 48.66 55.24 61.83 68.41 75.00 6.59 75.00Mandaluyong 38.2 48.75 55.65 62.00 68.50 75 75.00

FILIPINO GRAMMAR - Grade 3 Region 48.25 53.60 58.95 64.30 69.65 75.00 5.35 75.00Mandaluyong 43.51 53.65 59.00 65.00 70.00 75 75.00

SCIENCE - Grade 3 Region 42.44 48.95 55.46 61.98 68.49 75.00 6.51 75.00Mandaluyong 40.36 49.00 55.80 62.00 68.50 75 75.00

MATH - Grade 3 Region 43.75 50.00 56.25 62.50 68.75 75.00 6.25 75.00Mandaluyong 42.14 51.00 57.00 62.75 68.80 75.00 75.00

TOTAL TEST - Grade 3 Region 45.17 51.14 57.10 63.07 69.03 75.00 5.97 75.00Mandaluyong 41.74 51.24 57.35 63.29 69.15 75.00 75.00



Subject Area2011

(Actual)2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Annual % inc. to

meet the target

2016 PDP Target

MATH - Grade 6Region 51.99 56.59 61.19 65.80 70.40 75.00 4.60 75.00Mandaluyong 46.62 57.00 61.25 65.90 70.50 75.00 75.00

ENGLISH - Grade 6 Region 56.8 60.44 64.08 67.72 71.36 75.00 3.64 75.00Mandaluyong 50.60 60.60 64.50 67.80 71.75 75.00 75.00

SCIENCE - Grade 6 Region 56.63 60.30 63.98 67.65 71.33 75.00 3.67 75.00Mandaluyong 50.98 60.80 64.00 67.75 71.75 75.00 75.00

FILIPINO - Grade 6 Region 64.61 66.69 68.77 70.84 72.92 75.00 2.08 75.00Mandaluyong 61.17 67.00 69.00 71.00 73.00 75.00 75.00

HEKASI - Grade 6 Region 55.38 59.30 63.23 67.15 71.08 75.00 3.92 75.00Mandaluyong 52.48 60.00 63.75 67.50 71.50 75.00 75.00

TOTAL TEST - Grade 6 Region 57.08 60.66 64.25 67.83 71.42 75.00 3.58 75.00Mandaluyong 52.37 61.08 64.50 67.99 71.70 75.00 75.00



Subject Area2011

(Actual)2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Ave inc. to meet the

target

2016 PDP Target

ARALING PANLIPUNAN – HSRegion 55.91 59.73 63.55 67.36 71.18 75.00 3.82 75.00Mandaluyong 54.86 60.00 63.75 67.50 71.50 75.00 75.00

MATH - HS Region 43.89 50.11 56.33 62.56 68.78 75.00 6.22 75.00Mandaluyong 41.48 50.50 56.75 62.75 68.85 75.00 75.00

SCIENCE - HS Region 39.14 46.31 53.48 60.66 67.83 75.00 7.17 75.00Mandaluyong 38.49 46.50 53.75 60.75 68.00 75.00 75.00

ENGLISH - HS Region 53.2 57.56 61.92 66.28 70.64 75.00 4.36 75.00Mandaluyong 49.16 57.75 62.00 66.50 70.80 75.00 75.00

FILIPINO - HS Region 53.13 57.50 61.88 66.25 70.63 75.00 4.37 75.00Mandaluyong 53.07 58.00 62.00 67.00 71.00 75.00 75.00

CRITICAL THINKING - HS Region 50.53 55.42 60.32 65.21 70.11 75.00 4.89 75.00Mandaluyong 48.07 55.50 60.75 65.75 70.50 75.00 75.00

TOTAL TEST – HSRegion 49.32 54.46 59.59 64.73 70.00 75.00 5.14 75.00Mandaluyong 47.64 47.64 54.71 59.83 65.04 70.11 75.00 75.00


Strategies/PAPs1. Put in place grass root-based initiatives of all schools instructional support system

K to 12 Basic Education Program; SBM ACCESs; School Health and Feeding Program; Early Enrolment; Brigada Eskwela; Adopt-A-School; Universal Kindergarten Program; Peace Education; Child Protection Policy, Inclusive Education/SPED

2.Work with the private schools for the implementation of K to 12 Training; M&E activities

3.Widen coverage for ALS programs Launching of other livelihood programs and functional literacy program

4. Install Alternative Delivery Mode of learning Open High School; Dynamic Learning Program; Voc-Tech specialization courses in every secondary school.

ACCESS


5. Strengthen partnership with local government, congressional district office and private business owners, Rotary Club/civic/people

organization for better resource programming (facilities, seats, toilets, textbooks)

SBM ACCESs; Adopt-a-School Program; Kindergarten Program, Tech-Voc Program

6. Acquire learner-centered materials through school board and congressional initiative

Whole Brain Learning - Self- Mastery Learning Child-Centered Learning System;

7. Exploit available ICT facilities in every school ICT Enhanced Instruction; Knowledge Channel

Strategies/PAPsACCESS


Strategies/PAPs1. Put in place human development support system on new trends in learning and legal management for instructional leaders

Whole Brain Learning - Self-mastery Learning, Child-Centered Learning System;

2. Practice competency assessment and profiling of teachers to address performance gaps Competency-Based Assessment; Performance-Based Assessment; Research and Development

3. Strengthen collaboration with local government/congressional district office for capability development of teachers and for

performance- based incentives ICT Training for Teachers ; Performance-Based Incentives System; SSES and ESEP; SPA; SPS; Scouting

QUALITY


4. Improve assessment of current levels of SBM practice of schools, including quality of SIP/AIP and and implementation status

SBM/ PASBE

5. Link with businesses and industries for tech-voc

specialized courses in preparation to K to 12 (Senior HS) On-the-job Training Program for Senior High School

6 Improve learning competencies in Math, Science, English and reading NCR to SOAR; Teacher Quality Circle; Summer Reading and Science Camp; School-based INSET; ECARP; MTAP and other math interventions Journalism Science interventions

7. Foster non-selective/non-partisan relationship with barangay officials SBM- ACCESs

8. Customize trainings of teachers Customized Training for Teachers; Scholarship Program; GAD Integration

Strategies/PAPsQUALITY


EFFICIENCY1. Widen coverage for ALS programs

Launching of other livelihood programs and functional literal program

2. Expand implementation of Alternative Delivery Mode of learning, Open High School; Tech-Voc specialization in every secondary

school.

3. Create attractive learning environment to add value Search for Most Creative Learning Environment Child-Friendly School System

Strategies/PAPs


1. Rationalize the utilization of SEF budget Conduct of regular consultative meetings with political leaders and LSB for alignment of programs and projects; Implementation of the Joint Circular of DBM, DepEd, DILG and COA

2. Redefine collaboration framework with LGU’s, NGO’s and other interest groups Conduct of coordination meetings with LGU’s, Congressional District Office; NGO’s and other interest groups; SBM ACCESs

3. Retool human resources deployed by the local school board and LGU Capacity Building Program on Frontline Service Management; Basic English for Non-Teaching Personnel; Skills-Based Training

4. Install results-based performance management system Roll-Out on RPMS

5. Complete the data-based management systems and other mechanisms EBEIS, LIS, AMIS; HRIS; FMIS; LRMDS; eNGAS, Internal Audit System;

6. Upgrade of Level SBM practices with stakeholders SBM ACCESs; Acquisition, Improvement, Titling and Survey of School Sites

7. Foster non-partisan division and school leadership for harmonious relationship with barangay officials

SBM ACCESs

GOVERNANCE Strategies/PAPs


91.23%

8.77%

2014 PROPOSED BUDGET

PS

MOOE

Allotment GAA 2011 GAA 2012 GAA 2013 Proposed 2014 Budget

PS 397,500,000 417,381,000 528,717,000 602,403,000

MOOE 37,115,000 42,641,000 46,926,000 57,910,000

PS (% of increase) 5% 26.67% 13.94%

MOOE (% of Increase) 14.89% 10.05% 14.71%

The 13.94% (Php 73,686,000) increase in PS is due to the additional 132 items for deployment this 2013 and the opening of our newly legislated school this School Year 2013-2014. The 23.41% (Php 10,984,000) increase in MOOE represents the inclusion of 11 out of the 15 identified PAPs in the proposed budget of the Division.

Note: Proposed Budget SEF 2014 - Php 330,000,000.00

Budget Allocation


1515 Identified PAPs with corresponding DepEd OrdersIdentified PAPs with corresponding DepEd Orders(in '000)

PARTICULARS PS MOOE CO Total

Appropriation

1. Support to Special Science Elementary School (5) 375

1,875

2. Support to Engineering and Science Education Program High Schools (5)

164

820

3. Support to Secondary Schools with Special Program for Arts & Sports SPA and SPS (2)

500

1,000

4. Support to SPED Centers/Schools (4) 500

2,000

5. Every Child A Reader Program (ECARP) (17) * NCR to SOAR * Summer Reading and Science Camp * Early Reading and Math Assessment

1,899198

1,085

3,182

6. Alternative Learning Systems (ALS) * BLP and A&E * AGAP/GAM *ALS Unified Contracting Scheme * BP OSA

116,000

150,000 220,000

125,000

611 7. Implementation of the Alternative Delivery Mode Program * Open high school (9) * Dynamic Learning Program (5) * Whole Brain Learning (15)

584175

4,675 5,434

8. Implementation of the Redesigned Technical-Vocational High School Program (5) 1,109

5,545

9.. School Based Management (SBM) Installation & Support (17)

1,300

1,300

10. Human Resource Training and Development Including Teacher's Training, Scholarship & Fellowship Grants and Capacity building for Non- teaching Personnel

10,622

10,622

11. School Health and Nutrition Program (23) 4,642

4,642

TOTAL - Php 37,031


Programs/Activities/Projects (PAPs)PAPS Proponents/

Implementers

Proposed Budget/Source

Locally- Funded

SEF School Fund

1. Special Science Elem School (SSES)(Php 1,875,000)

Dona Pilar Gonzaga Elementary SchoolHighway Hills Integrated SchoolMandaluyong Elementary SchoolHulo Elementary SchoolEulogio Rodriguez Integrated School

Php 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000

2. Engineering and Science Special School (ESEP)(Php 820,000)

Mataas Na Paaralang Neptali A. Gonzales Andres Bonifacio Integrated School Highway Hills Integrated School, Eulogio Rodriguez Integrated School Mandaluyong High School

164,000 164,000 164,000 164,000 164,000

3. Special Program for the Arts and Sports(SPA/SPS)(Php 1,000,000)

Highway Hills Integrated School (SPA)Eulogio Rodrigues Integrated School (SPS)

500,000 500,000

4. Special Education (SPED) (Php 2,000,000)

Eulogio Rodriguez Integrated SchoolIsaac Lopez Integrated SchoolPedro P. Cruz Elementary SchoolNueve de Febrero Elementary School

500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000



Implementers


Locally- Funded

SEF/ CONG

School Fund

5. Every Child a Reading Program (ECARP)(Php 3,180,500)

a. NCR to SOAR ( 23 Schools)b. Summer Reading and Science Camp (23

schools)c. Early Reading and Math Assessment (19

Schools)

Php 1,898,525

197,500

1,084,475

SEF

6. Alternative Learning System(ALS)(php 611,000)

a. BLP and A&Eb. AGAP/GAMc. ALS Unified Contracting Schemed. BP OSA

116,000 150,000 220,000 125,000

SEF

7. Alternative Delivery Mode (ADM) (php 5,434,050)

a. Open High School (9 HS)b. Dynamic Learning Program (DLP): - DPCGES; PPCES; FPJES;ERIS( HS);HHIS (HS)c. Whole Brain Learning: ( 9 ES & 6 HS)

583,875 175,000

4,675,175

with SEF/conginitiative

8. Redesign Tech-Voc High School Prog (STVEP)(php 5,545,000)

a. MHSb. ABISc. BJNHSd. ILISe. MPNAG

1,109,000 1,109,000 1,109,000 1,109,000 1,109,000

with SEF/Cong.. initiative


Programs/Activities/Projects (PAPs)

PAPS Proponents/Implementers


Locally- Funded

SEF/ CONG

School Fund

9. School-Based Management (SBM)(php 1,292,118)

a. SBM-recipient schools

b. Non-recipient Schools

May also use MOOEif needed

MOOE

ElementaryAndres Bonifacio ISDona Pilar C. Gonzaga ESEulogio Rodriguez ISFilemon P. Javier ESHighway Hills ISHulo ESIlaya Barangka ISIsaac Lopez ISMandaluyong ESNueve de Febrero ESPedro P. Cruz ESPlainview ESPleasant Hills ES

SecondaryANDRES BONIFACIO INTEGRATED SCHOOLBONIFACIO JAVIER NATIONAL HSMATAAS NA PAALARANG NEPTALI A. GONZALESMANDALUYONG HS

Division Office (Support Fund)

110,000.00 50,580.40 70,000.00 75,000.00

100,000.00 100,000.00 55,000.00 70,000.00 70,000.00

130,000.00 50,580.40 50,580.40 50,580.40

55,000.00 50,580.40 60,000.00 80,000.00 63,216.00





Locally- Funded

SEF/ CONG

School Fund

10. Human Resource Training and Development Including Teacher’s Training, Scholarship & Fellowship Grants and Capacity building for Non-Teaching Personnel(HRTD)(php (10,621,850) ALS Teachers’ Training Program (41 x 5 x 7,700)

78,375

312,000

SEF/

CongInitiative

2. Scholarship (30 teachers php 25,000) 750,000

1. Customized training for Teachers 1,760 Knowledge/Content (5 days) (50%) (880 x 5 days x Php 275) Teaching Skills (5 days) (50%) (880 x 5 days x Php 275) Classroom Management Skills / Behavior (2 days) (50%) (880 x 2 days x Php 275) Values Formation for Teachers (5 days) (100%) (1760 x 5 days x Php 275) ICT Enhanced Instruction (2 days) (50%) (880 x 2 days x Php 275) Exploratory Skills Enhancement for TLE teachers (5 days) (138) (138 x 5 days x Php 275) Gender Analysis as a Tool for Gender Responsive Planning

Training/Workshop (50 x Php 5,000) (3-day training)

1,210,000.00 1,210,000.00

484,000.00 2,420,000.00

484,000.00 189,750.00 250,000.00

Training of Kinder Teachers (95 x 3 days x Php 275)

6,638,125.00





Locally- Funded

SEF/ CONG

School Fund

10. Human Resource Training and Development Including Teacher’s Training, Scholarship & Fellowship Grants and Capacity building for Non-Teaching Personnel(HRTD)(php(php 10,621,850)

Php 770,000

SEF/CongInitiative

3. Capability building for Non-Teaching Personneleps/psds (11 x Php 10,000)principals (23 x Php 10,000)

section chiefs (6 x Php 10,000)

support staff (26 x Php 550)

sds (1 x Php 60,000)asds (1 x Php 60,000)

Training workshop for instructional supervision and values formationTraining workshop for instructional supervisionValues formationSelf-Mastery learningSpecialized/Skills trainingSelf-Mastery learning

Frontline service managementEnhancement of skills and Basic English and Technical Writing SkillsEnhancement of managerial and leadership competenciesEnhancement of managerial and leadership competencies

110,000.00 230,000.00

60,000.00

250,000.00

60,000.00 60,000.00



Implementers


Locally- Funded

SEF/ CONG

School Fund

10. Human Resource Training and Development Including Teacher’s Training, Scholarship & Fellowship Grants and Capacity building for Non-Teaching Personnel(HRTD)(php(php 10,621,850)

php 758,725

SEF/CongInitiative

5. Research and Development - Training/workshop on the conduct of research - Research on Authentic Assessment of Students

16,225575,000

Php 591,225

6. Completion of Database Management Systems - Retooling/training of personnel in-charge of the database management system (7 systems x 23 schools; 7 division in-charge; 23 principals) (191 x Php 275 x 7days)

367,675

4. Teachers Profiling and AssessmentCompetency-based assessment

Performance-based assessment (RPMS)

Reproduction of materials (1760 teachers x Php 150)Orientation on the conduct of assessment (1760 teachers x Php 275)Data analysis and interpretation (EPS/PSDS/SDS) (13 x Php 275 x 3 days)

Orientation-RPMS (36 x Php 275)(EPS/PSDS/SDS/ASDS/principals)

264,000.00 484,000.00 10,725.00

9,900.00



Implementers


Locally- Funded

SEF/ CONG

School Fund

10.Human Resource Training and Development Including Teacher’s Training, Scholarship & Fellowship Grants and Capacity building for Non-Teaching Personnel(HRTD)(php 10,621,850)

7. Monitoring and Evaluation and TAs (Quarterly)

736,200.00

SSES (5 schools x 4 periods x Php 5,000)

SPED (5 schools x 4 periods x Php 5,000)

SPA (Php 5,000 x 4 periods)

SPS (Php 5,000 x 4 periods)NCR TO SOAR (23 schools x Php 6,400)

Summer Reading and Science Camp (23 schools x Php 2,000)(at least 4X visits

Early Reading and Math Assessment (19 schools x Php 5,000)

Open High School (9 schools x Php 7,000)

Whole-Brain Learning (4 periods x Php 5,000)

Dynamic Learning Program (5 schools x Php 10,000)

Technical-Vocational High School Program (5 schools x Php 15,000)

100,000.00 100,000.00

20,000.00 20,000.00

147,200.00

46,000.00

95,000.00

63,000.00

20,000.00

50,000.00

75,000.00



Implementers


Locally- Funded

SEF/ CONG

School Fund

11. School Health and Nutrition Program (Php.4,607,205)

1. Health Assessment Program (23 schools)

2. Gulayan sa Paaralan / Food Always in the Home (FAITH) / Bio-intensive Gardening (BIG) (Urban Gardening) ECO - Saver

1,150,000

4,642,205

SEF MOOEMOOE

MOOE

MOOE

Health assessment (Medical, Optical and Dental Assessment)

Medical assessment tool (5,147 pupils x 3 tools x Php 5)

Medical equipment for assessment

Advocacy and mobilization activities

Medical instructional materials (digital or non-digital) (23 schools x Php 5,000)

Medical, Dental and Optical services

Provision of first-aid kit/medicines (10% of the total population of schools = 3,300 x Php 100)

Dental fillings, anaesthesia, etc (10% of the total population of schools = 3,300 x Php 300)

Procurement of Vitamin A, C and Iron (10% of the total population of schools = 3,300 x Php 5 x 120 days)

77,205.00

115,000.00

330,000.00 990,000.00

1,980,000.00 3,492,205.00


This Division is convinced that we will be able to reach our desired destiny. We will be guided by the paradigm that if we want change, we must do things differently. Unlearning of learning that does not work anymore and discovering new learning is said to be the greatest knowledge.

We continue to push our aspirations and cling to our faith that DepEd Mandaluyong can be the best of what it can be for 2014 and beyond.

So, help us God.

DepEd Mandaluyong Dr. EVANGELINE P. LADINES, OIC-Schools Division SuperintendentDr. NERISSA L. LOSARIA, OIC-Asst. Schools Division Superintendent

Dr. ALYN G. MENDOZA, Education Program SupervisorMiss. KRIZEL A. TAYAG, AccountantMrs. MA. DELMA A. ABRINGE- Planning Officer II

In Summary:

division of city schools city of mandaluyong

Documents