diversity update 2012 october 2012
DESCRIPTION
Diversity Update 2012 October 2012. Demographic Variables and Reporting. http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm. This section includes information on: Demographic variables and how they are collected and reported. Equity in Educational Outcomes. Demographic Variables for Analysis. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Diversity Update 2012
October 2012
This section includes information on:• Demographic variables and how they are
collected and reported
Demographic Variables and Reporting
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Demographic Variables for Analysis
This presentation is limited to variables for which we have quantitative information, including: Race/ethnicity Income level First-generation in college Gender Geographic diversity Information is not systematically available for all groupsthat are important to inclusive excellence.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Race/Ethnic Categories: Students
Continued terminology from Plan 2008
Includes all Asians, useful for national peer comparisons.
• Targeted Minorities include:» African American» Native American» Hispanic/Latino/a» Southeast Asian
(Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong)
• Minorities include:» Targeted Minority
categories» Other Asians» Native Hawaiians
Students self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of application.http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
International students are not counted in any of these collections, in keeping with state/federal guidelines.
Race/Ethnicity Reportinghttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htmReporting Methodologies for Race/Ethnicity Information
The relatively new ability to indicate multiple race/ethnic values results in a much richer picture of student diversity but data reporting is more complicated. To deal with these complexities, methodology options for data reporting have emerged . The method that is most appropriate depends on for what purpose the data will be used. The table below describes the features of each method and shows how the methods are similar and different from each other. Subsequent slides in this presentation use the Primary reporting methodology.
Reporting Feature Primary Federal Count All
Results in single count of students P P
Prioritizes Hispanic/Latina(a) over other values P
Creates new categories that are not reported by students themselves P
Displays race/ethnic values only for domestic (non international) students P P P
Displays ALL students who indicate a particularrace/ethnicity P
Prioritizes some race/ethnicities over others P P
Used in external data reporting and rankings P
This section includes information on:• Enrollment
– Undergraduate– Graduate– Professional– School/College– Peer comparisons
Includes breakouts by race/ethnicity, gender, geography
Enrollment
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
747576777879808182838485868788899091929394959697989900010203040506070809101112
RevisedRace/Ethnic Categories
Southeast Asian Collection BeginsRace/Ethnicity Collection Begins
Minority Students, 14.5%
Targeted Minority Students, 9.9%
From 2003 to 2012 4.4 percentage
point increase in Minority Enrollment
3.4 percentage point increase in Targeted Minority Enrollment
Indicator 1: Percent Enrollment of MinorityUndergraduate Students
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). Minorities include targeted minorities as well as Other Asians and Native Hawaiians. International students are not counted for targeted minority collections.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data is preliminary.
Indicator 2: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Undergraduate Students by Race/Ethnicity
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
From 2003 to 2012: Increases in undergraduate
enrollment in all race/ethnic
categories 3.7 percentage
point increase in undergraduate
targeted minority enrollment
International Students: 6.8% of
Undergraduate Enrollment
2012 data is preliminary.
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
2.4% 2.4% 2.5% 2.7% 2.9% 2.9% 3.0% 2.8% 2.8% 2.7%
1.2% 1.4% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% 1.8%0.5%0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0% 0.9%2.4%
2.6%2.8%
3.1%3.3% 3.6%
3.8% 3.9% 4.3% 4.4%
% o
f Tot
al U
nder
grad
uate
s
Hispanic/ Latino/a
Native American
SE Asian
African Ameri-can
From 2003 to 2012: 1.6 percentage
point increase in first-year undergraduate targeted minority enrollment
Indicator 2 Detail: Percent Enrollment of First-Year Targeted Minority Undergraduates, by Race/Ethnicity
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data is preliminary.
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
2.7% 2.7% 2.9% 3.3% 3.0% 2.6% 3.0% 2.6% 2.8% 2.3%
1.5% 1.9% 1.9%2.0% 2.2%
1.6%2.2%
2.2% 2.0%1.6%
0.6%0.8% 0.6%
0.6% 0.9%
0.9%
1.2%1.0% 1.0%
0.8%
2.6%
3.3% 3.4%3.7% 3.7%
4.2%
4.7%
3.7%5.2%
4.3%
% o
f Tot
al F
irst Y
ear U
nder
grad
uate
s
Hispanic/ Latino/a
Native American
SE Asian
African American
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
2
4
6
8
10
12
6.98.1 8.1 8.8 9.3 8.9
10.29.1
10.78.8
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
2
4
6
8
10
12
6.5 7.1 7.5 8 8.6 9 9.7 9.5 9.9 9.9
Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Undergraduates
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data is preliminary.
• 9.9% of all undergraduates are targeted minorities.
• 8.8% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are targeted minorities.
All Undergraduates
New Undergraduates
10%9%
6%
10%
8%
16%
11%10%
2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
TOTAL CALS Business Education Engineering SoHE L&S Nursing Pharmacy
% o
f Und
ergr
adua
te E
nrol
lmen
t
N=2,871N=278
N=104
N=196
N=309
N=120
N=1,790
N=73
N=1
• In 2012, the College of Letters and Science has the largest number of undergraduate targeted minority students enrolled.
• The School of Human Ecology has the largest percentage of undergraduate targeted minority students enrolled, with 16 percent of SoHE students identifying as targeted minorities.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Percent Targeted Minority Enrollment by School/College: Undergraduates, Fall 2012
2012 data is preliminary.
Iowa State
Iowa State
Indiana
Wisconsin
Penn State
Pittsburgh
Michigan State
Minnesota
Michigan
Virginia
North Carolina
Florida
Washington
Texas
Rutgers
UC-Davis
UC-San Diego
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
N = 2,228N = 1,917N = 2,328N = 4,102N = 4,365N = 3,360N = 4,137N = 3,050N = 5,870N = 6,559N = 2,904N = 4,371N = 6,109N = 3,456N = 6,110
N = 4,053N = 6,473N = 10,125N = 4,108N = 8,745N = 5,366
N = 10,197N = 11,891N = 9,963N = 11,040
N = 6,468N = 16,673N = 8,720N = 13,892
N = 14,089N = 14,160N = 15,024
N = 15,180N = 15,396
Percent of Undergraduates
Percent of Undergraduates who are Minorities at AAU Public Institutions, Fall 2010
Average Percent Minority for AAU Public Institutions: 29%
6 AAU Public Institutions have a lower percent of minority students than UW-Madison.
10 AAU Public Institutions have a smaller number of minority students than UW-Madison.
Peer Enrollments by Minority Status
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Source: IPEDS Fall Enrollment, Fall 2010
80%
Undergraduate Enrollment Comparisons
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• UW-Madison enrolled 2,750 targeted minority undergraduates (Fall 2009)
• There are 2,731 institutions in the United States that grant bachelor’s degrees. Of these, only 873 (32%) have more total undergraduates enrolled than UW-Madison has targeted minority undergraduates enrolled
• There are 61 institutions in Wisconsin that grant bachelor’s degrees. Of these, only 20 (33%) have more total undergraduates enrolled than UW-Madison has targeted minority students enrolled
UW-Madison educates relatively large numbers of minority students
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
2.1% 2.2% 2.1% 2.3% 2.5% 2.7% 2.7% 2.6% 2.7% 2.8%
0.5% 0.3% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0% 1.0%0.5% 0.4% 0.5%
0.6% 0.7% 0.8% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%2.5% 2.5% 2.7%2.8% 2.9% 2.9%
3.2% 3.5% 3.7% 4.0%
% o
f Tot
al G
radu
ate
Stud
ent E
nrol
lmen
t
His-panic/ Latino/a
Native American
SE Asian
African American
Indicator 3: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Graduate Students, by Race/Ethnicity
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
From 2003 to 2012: Increases in
graduate student enrollment in all race/ethnic categories
3.2 percentage point increase in graduate targeted minority enrollment
International Students make up 25.6% of graduate enrollment
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data is preliminary.
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
3.6% 3.4% 3.9% 4.0% 4.4% 4.5% 4.1% 4.2% 4.2% 4.3%
0.3% 0.4%0.7% 0.9%
1.3% 1.6%1.6% 1.3% 1.2% 0.7%1.1% 1.0%
0.9%1.1%
1.2%1.3%
1.2% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
4.0% 4.1%3.5%
3.6%
3.7%3.7%
3.4%3.4% 3.3%
2.9%
% o
f Tot
al p
rofe
ssio
nal S
tude
nt E
nrol
lmen
t
Hispanic/ Latino/a
Native Ameri-canSE Asian
African Ameri-can
• From 2003 to 2012: Constant percent
of professional targeted minority enrollment
International Students make up 3.9% of professional student enrollment
Indicator 4: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Professional Students, by Race/Ethnicity
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data is preliminary.Professional: DVM, MD, PharmD, Law, PA, MPH, DPT
8%6%
8%
16%
6%
7%
7%
7%
15%
8%
3%
8%
4%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
Total CALS Business Educ. Eng. SoHE Nelson L&S Law SMPH Nurs. Pharm. Vet Med
% o
f Tot
al G
rad/
Prof
Col
lege
Enr
ollm
ent
N=1,060N=72
N=43
N=182
N=88
N=10
N=6
N=326
N=111
N=146
N=11
N=46
N=19
Targeted Minority Enrollment by School/College:Graduate/Professional Programs, Fall 2012
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Fall 2012• The School of
Education has the largest
percentage of targeted minority graduate students
(16%).
2012 data is preliminary.
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201202468
1012141618
12 12.510.7 11.4 11.7 11.1
14.116 16.5
13.7
Indicator 5: Percent Enrollment of Pell Grant Recipients (Undergraduates)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data is preliminary.
• 14.3% of all undergraduates are Pell Grant recipients.
• 13.7% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are Pell Grant recipients.
All Undergraduates
New Undergraduates
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201202468
1012141618
12.6 12.811.6 11.5 12.2 11.7
14.717.0 16.0
14.3
VirginiaMichigan
WisconsinColorado
Penn StateIowa
PittsburghIndianaIllinois
MarylandNorth Carolina
NebraskaPurdue
Texas A & MKansas
MissouriMinnesotaIowa State
OregonWashington
Michigan StateTexas
Ohio StateRutgersFloridaBuffaloArizona
UC-BerkeleyStony Brook
UCLAUC-Santa Barbara
UC-IrvineUC-Davis
UC-San Diego
0 10 20 30 40 50
N = 1,956N = 4,436N = 4,921
N = 4,695N = 7,405N = 4,086N = 3,504N = 6,487N = 6,437N = 5,302N = 3,775N = 4,046N = 7,183N = 8,434N = 4,482N = 5,374
N = 8,090N = 5,741N = 4,977N = 7,406N = 9,250N = 10,236N = 11,854N = 8,679N = 9,857N = 5,971N = 9,679
N = 8,798N = 5,774N = 9,417N = 6,842N = 8,051
N = 10,207N = 10,910
Percent of Undergraduates
Percent of Undergraduates who Pell Recipients at AAU Public Institutions, 2010-11
Average percent pell recipients for AAU public institutions: 26%
2 AAU public institutions have a lower or equal percent of Pell recipients than UW-Madison.
8 AAU public institutions have a lower number of Pell recipients than UW-Madison.
Peer Enrollments of Pell Grant Recipients
Source: IPEDS Student Financial Aid Data, 2010-11http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
50%
Pell Grants are federally funded grants for students with high financial need. This indicator is a proxy for low income student enrollments.
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
5
10
15
20
25
8.1
13.317.6
20.8 22.3 22.1 21.8 20.8 • Data on first-generation status is collected at the time of application.
• Question first asked in 2005.
• 18.9% of New Students (New Freshmen + New Transfers) are first-generation students.
Indicator 6: Percent Enrollment of First-Generation Students (Undergraduates)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data is preliminary.
All Undergraduates
New Undergraduates
Accumulating Data
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
5
10
15
20
25
21.9 23.0 23.4 22.9 23.1 21.4 21.918.9
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201242%
44%
46%
48%
50%
52%
54%
56%
51.6%
48.4%
Indicator 7: Percent UndergraduateEnrollment by Gender, Fall 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data is preliminary.
Women
Men
Women havecomprised morethan half ofundergraduateenrollment since1996.
52%
60%
43%
72%
20%
81%
54%
89%
52%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
TOTAL CALS Business Education Engineering SoHE L&S Nursing Pharmacy
Women as a Percentage of Total Undergraduate Enrollment, by School/College, Fall 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Fall 2012• Nursing has the
highest percent of women
undergraduates enrolled (89%)
and Engineering has the lowest percent (20%)
2012 data is preliminary.
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201242%
44%
46%
48%
50%
52%
54%
56%
50.2%
49.8%
Women havecomprised morethan half ofgraduate/professionalenrollment since2003
Indicator 8: Percent Graduate/ProfessionalEnrollment by Gender, Fall 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Women
Men
2012 data is preliminary.
50%52%
35%
69%
21%
83%
65%
53%
43%
52%
95%
58%
73%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Total CALS Business Educ. Eng. SoHE Nelson L&S Law SMPH Nurs. Pharm. Vet Med
Women as a Percentage of Total Grad/Professional Enrollment, by School/College, Fall 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Fall 2011• Nursing has the highest percent of
women enrolled in a graduate or
professional program, while
Engineering has the lowest percent
of women enrolled.
2012 data is preliminary.
Enrollments by WI CountyHome County of UW-Madison Undergraduate Students (Wisconsin Residents)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Among the 72 Wisconsin counties, each is represented by at least 5 undergraduate students in Fall 2012.
Red: More than 4% of resident undergraduates from countyBlack: Between 2% and 4% of resident undergraduates from countyLight Gray: Less than 2% (but at least five students) of resident undergraduates from county
This section includes information on:• Undergraduate Pipeline and Access• Diversity Programs
Undergraduate Access and Pipeline
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Undergraduate Enrollment Pipeline
The population in high school serves as a major pool for UW-Madison undergraduates• We can estimate the pipeline for several groups
– Minority Students– Low-Income (Pell or Free/Reduced Lunch)– First-Generation Students– Rural students
Pipelinehttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
UW-Madison Enrolled
UW-Madison Admits
UW-Madison Applicants
Population 13-17"Potential"* First
Generation Students
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%Percent of Group Total
Wisconsin's First-Generation College-Going Recruiting Pool
(291,312 of 386,920)
(2,187 of 8,441)
(1,229 of 5,740)
(782 of 3,515)
No data available on graduation rates or academic achievement by parental education levels within Wisconsin
Pipeline: First Generation
*“Potential” First Generation Students does not imply any level of academic achievement, school enrollment, or preparedness. This estimate reflects the population 13-17 with no parent/guardian in the household with a Bachelor’s Degree. Sources: Overall WI Population (U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2005-2007 Estimates), Potential First Generation Students (“Parental Education and College Participation Rates in Wisconsin”, Sara Lazenby, August 2009), 2010 US Census Data, Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls for 2012-13 School Year
An estimated 75% of 13-17 year old Wisconsin residents live in households where no parent/guardian holds a bachelor’s degree.
Approximately 22% of UW-Madison Resident New Freshman are first-generation students.
We do not have a reliable data source on high school graduation or college preparedness by parental education levels for Wisconsin residents.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%Percent of Group Total
Wisconsin's Low-Income Recruiting Pool
(90,991 of 264,206)
(14,504 of 64,687)
No Data Available on Low-Income Status of UW-Madison Applicants or Admits
(591 of 3,515)
Economically Disadvantaged High School Public School Students
Economically Disadvantaged Public High School Graduates
UW-Madison Enrolled
Pipeline: Low Income
“Economically Disadvantaged” represents those students who are eligible for free/reduced lunch.Sources: Wisconsin DPI WINSS, 2010-12 Enrollment by Student Group, Completions by Student GroupUW-Madison Data based on Fall 2012-13
• 34% of Public K-12 students in Wisconsin are Economically Disadvantaged (2011-12)
• 23% of Public High School Graduates are Economically Disadvantaged (2010)
• We have no reliable information on income of applicant students, all data based on financial aid applications
• 17% of Resident New Freshmen are Pell Grant Recipients
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
UW-Madison Enrolled
UW-Madison Admits
UW-Madison Applicants
"Well-Prepared" Minority Public High
School Graduates
Minority Public High School Graduates
Minority Public High School Students
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%Percent of Group Total
Wisconsin's Minority Recruiting Pool
(290,550 of 385,907)
(1,335 of 8441)
(729 of 5,740)
(483 of 3,515)
(753 of 14,943)
(11,568 of 64,687)
(56,519 of 264,206)
Pipeline: Minority
• 21% of Public High School students in Wisconsin are minority students(2011-12)
• 18% of Public High School Graduates are minority students (2009-10)
• 14% of Resident New Freshmen are minority students (2012)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
“Well-prepared” high school graduates are in the top quartile of their graduating classes and score at least 22 (WI Average) on the ACT (or equivalent SAT score). The ACT is only one of many academic factors considered in the admissions process.
23
23
21
30
50
77
77
79
70
50
Percent of Enrolled Freshmen
Percent of Freshmen Admits
Percent of Freshmen Applicants
Percent of 12th Graders
Percent of High Schools
Percent Rural, by Pipeline Step Not Rural Rural
Pipeline: Rural
• While over half of WI high schools are considered rural, only 30% of 12th graders attend a rural high school.
• Rural high school students apply at lower rates than other students
• Once they apply, rural students are admitted and enroll at rates proportional to their application rate.
Source: High School Characteristics and Early Academic Performance at UW-Madison, Clare Huhn, APIR.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls,New Freshmen, Fall 2012
• Wisconsin residents are the most likely applicants to be admitted and are most likely to enroll compared to other groups.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Total Applicants
% Admitted
% Enrolled/ Yield Rate
Overall 29,034 54.6 39.6
Male 14,235 51.0 40.4Female 14,799 57.9 39.0
Resident 8,441 68.0 61.2Domestic Non-Res. 12,581 50.7 22.1
International 4,770 41.3 30.6
Targeted Minorties 3,305 44.5 38.3Total Minority 5,418 49.2 33.3
First Generation 4,790 45.8 47.1
Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls, Transfer Students, Fall 2012
• One reason for low admit rates for transfer applicants is that many applicants do not meet the minimum requirements for admission
• Wisconsin residents are the most likely applicants to be admitted and are most likely to enroll compared to other groups.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Total Applicants
% Admitted
% Enrolled/ Yield Rate
Overall 4,367 45.9 61.0
Male 2,252 43.4 62.2Female 2,115 48.6 59.9
Resident 2,265 55.1 72.6Domestic Non-Res. 1,068 40.6 37.8
International 743 24.8 40.2
Targeted Minorties 460 34.4 52.7Total Minority 662 36.7 54.4
First Generation 1,319 44.4 61.6
Diversity Programs
Programs that increase access and success for underrepresented populations on campus and are centrally coordinated.• Programs with a Pre-College Component
– PEOPLE– POSSE
• Student Support Programs– CEO (formerly TRIO)– Academic Advancement Program– Pathways
• Scholarship Programs– Chancellor’s Scholars– Powers/Knapp– First Wave
Academic Excellence Communitieshttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Fall 2012 Undergraduate Participation in Academic Excellence Communities
*Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Academic Excellence Community
Total Participants
Targeted Minority* Male Wisconsin
ResidentFirst
GenerationPell Grant
Eligible
Academic Advancement Program (AAP)
282 95% 45% 73% 29% 43%
Center for EducationalOpportunity (CEO) 440 88% 40% 72% 92% 79%
PEOPLE 325 86% 46% 96% 56% 58%
Posse 157 83% 48% 0% 62% 51%
First Wave 61 77% 43% 20% 59% 54%
Chancellor’s Scholar Program 203 99% 37% 62% 30% 23%
Powers/KnappProgram 174 99% 40% 84% 52% 46%
Pathways 79 91% 59% 61% 19% 23%
All Undergraduates 29,119 10% 48% 62% 21% 15%
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Impact of PEOPLE and POSSE on Freshmen Enrollment
Targeted Minority New Freshmen Fall 2011 / Fall 20012011 New Freshmen (644) 2001 New Freshmen (389)
Non-Residents(256)
WI Residents(388)
Non-Residents (143)
WI Residents(246)
Illinois(96)
POSSE (9) Milwaukee(105)
PEOPLE (22) Illinois(42)
Milwaukee(76)Other (87) Other (83)
Minnesota(59)
Dane(68)
PEOPLE (37) Minnesota(36)
Dane(54)Other (31)
California(18)
POSSE (8) Waukesha(29)
PEOPLE (2) California(9)
Waukesha(16)Other (10) Other (27)
DC/Maryland/VA(18)
POSSE (11) Racine(11)
PEOPLE (2)New York (7) Brown
(12)Other (7) Other (9)
Other States(65)
Marathon(19)
Other States(49)
Outagamie(10)
Kenosha(17)
PEOPLE (8) Kenosha (7)Other (9)
Other Counties(139)
PEOPLE (7) Other Counties(71)Other (132)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• The first PEOPLE/POSSE students entered college in 2002
This section includes information on progress to degree measures including
• Retention and graduation rates• Time to degree (PERHAPS ADD A
SLIDE ON TTD?)• Peer comparisons
Undergraduate Progress to Degreehttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Retention and Graduation
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 201070
80
90
100
Perc
ent R
etai
ned
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 201040
50
60
70
80
90
100
Year of Cohort Entrance
Perc
ent G
radu
ated
Graduation Rates: (percent graduated within 6 years)
Retention Rates: (percent retained to the second year)
14 percentage pointGraduation Rate gap
2 percentage point First-YearRetention Rate gap
All Students: 94%
All Students: 83%
Targeted Minority Students: 69%
Targeted Minority Students: 92%
Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by Student Group
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm1-Year Retention Rate % Difference 6-Year Graduation
Rate % Difference
All New Freshmen 93.9 - 82.8 -Women 93.7 -.2 83.4 0.6
Men 94.1 0.2 81.9 -0.9Targeted Minority 91.7 -2.2 68.8 -14.0
Non-Targeted 94.2 0.3 84.1 1.3African American 92.9 -1.0 61.9 -20.9Native American 89.5 -4.4 68.6 -14.2
Hispanic/Latino/a 92.3 -1.6 74.9 -7.9South East Asian 89.9 -4.0 68.4 -14.4
Non-Targeted Asian 95.9 2.0 81.7 -1.1International 88.7 -5.2 70.5 -12.3
Wisconsin Residents 95.0 1.1 83.4 0.6Non-Residents 92.4 -1.5 80.7 -2.1
First-Generation College Students 93.1 -0.8 75.8 -7.0Freshmen Who Received Need-Based Aid 93.2 -0.7 76.4 -6.4
Freshmen Recipients of Pell Grants 91.7 -2.2 69.7 -13.1FIGs 95.0 1.1 79.1 -3.7
Targeted Minority in FIGs 93.8 -0.1 64.7 -18.1Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2010 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2005 Cohort
Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by Student Group
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by Student Group
1-Year Retention Rate % Difference 6-Year Graduation
Rate % Difference
All New Freshmen 93.9 - 82.8 -Targeted Minority 91.7 -3.5 68.8 -17.1
PEOPLE 94.8 0.9 70.7 -12.2POSSE 100 6.1 68.2 -14.6
Chancellor's Scholars 95.9 2.0 92.8 10.1Powers/Knapp Scholars 94.7 0.8 83.9 1.1
AAP Participants 94.2 0.3 65.2 -17.6First Wave* 100 6.1
CEO*Pathways*
Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2010 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2005 Cohort*Retention/Graduation Rates not yet available for CEO and Pathways; Graduation rates not yet available for First Wave
Graduation Rates of Targeted Minorities by Participation in an Academic Excellence Program
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
All Students
Targeted Minorities in an Academic Excellence Program
Targeted Minorities not in an Academic Excellence Program
All Targeted Minorities
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 200550
60
70
80
90
100
*Academic Excellence Programs do not include programs coordinated by Schools/Colleges
Retention and Graduation Rates, by Gender and Race/Ethnicity
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Retained to Second Year (Men)
Retained to Second Year (Women)
Graduated in Six Years (Men) Graduated in Six Years (Women)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
UW-Madison Retention and Graduation Rates By Gender and Race/Ethnicity
All Students White Asian/Pacific Islander Hispanic Black American Indian/Alaskan Native
Source: UW-Madison CSRDE Submission; 3-Year Average of Rates from 2003-2005 SL, APIR, September 2012
Retention and Graduation Rates,among Student Athletes
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Total Asian White Black Hispanic International0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
N=22,708
N=1,250
N=19,221
N=584
N =621 N = 674N=385
N=9
N=275
N=68
N = 8
N = 22
Graduation Rates Among Student-Athletes (Average of 2001-2005 Entering Cohorts)
All Students Student-Athletes
Source: 2011 NCAA Graduation Rates Report. Data represents those groups with at least 5 student athletes in the four-cohort average. SL, APIR, July 2012
Ari
zona
Kans
asSU
NY-
Buffa
loN
ebra
ska
SUN
Y-St
ony
Broo
kCo
lora
doO
rego
nM
isso
uri
Iow
a St
ate
Purd
ueM
inne
sota
Iow
aIn
dian
aRu
tger
sO
hio
Stat
eW
eigh
ted
Ave
rage
Pitt
sbur
ghM
ichi
gan
Stat
eG
eorg
ia T
ech
UC
Sant
a Ba
rbar
aCa
se W
este
rnTe
xas
A&
MW
ashi
ngto
nTe
xas
UC
Dav
isM
aryl
and
Syra
cuse
UC
Irvi
neW
isco
nsin
Illin
ois
Flor
ida
Penn
Sta
teCa
ltec
hM
ichi
gan
UCL
AU
C Be
rkel
eyVa
nder
bilt
MIT
Colu
mbi
aCo
rnel
lVi
rgin
iaBr
own
Nor
thw
este
rn
-20.0
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
Perc
enta
ge P
oint
Gap
Percentage Point Graduation Gap of Fall 2003-2005 Entrance Cohorts, Selected AAU Institutions
Selected Institutions, CSRDE data, sorted from lowest to highest overall graduation rates.
• Average graduation gap among AAU institutions is 1.2% (was 9.1% for 2002-2004 cohorts)
• Gap at UW-Madison is 10.5 percent, Compared to 17.1% for 2002-2004 cohorts.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
This section includes information on • Participation in the Wisconsin
Experience• Student’s perception of their
learning experience
Bachelor’s Degree Holdershttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• “Wisconsin Experience” captures four inquiry-based high-impact practices and includes:– Substantial research experiences that
generate knowledge and analytical skills
– Global and cultural competencies and engagement
– Leadership and activism opportunities– Application of knowledge in the “real
world”• In 2010-11, 88% of bachelor’s degree
recipients participated in at least one Wisconsin Experience Program
• Targeted minority graduates were slightly more likely to have completed at least one Wisconsin Experience activity.
Wisconsin Experience
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
88% 92%
0
20
40
60
80
100
Percent of Graduates with at Least One Wisconsin Experience Activity
All Graduates Targeted Minority Graduates
Wisconsin Experience
Equity in Educational Outcomes
• In 2010-11 targeted minority students were slightly more likely to have completed a Wisconsin Experience activity.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Non-Targeted Targeted* Non-Targeted Targeted*ALS 590 39 100 100BUS 563 21 81 81EDU 328 30 97 97EGR 643 30 86 87HEC 274 37 96 100L&S 3,437 336 86 90MPH 46 5 100 100NUR 160 16 100 100PHM 12 0 100 ---Total 6,053 514 88 92
Number of Graduates Percent of Graduates with at Least One Wisconsin Experience Activity
Bachelor's Degree Recipients in 2010-11 by Targeted Minority Status
Wisconsin Experience
Equity in Educational Outcomes
• Transfer-start graduates participated in Wisconsin Experience activities at lower rates (80%) than freshman-start graduates (91%).
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
ALS 499 130 100 100BUS 472 112 85 67EDU 255 103 98 93EGR 542 131 88 82HEC 239 72 96 96L&S 2,958 815 90 73MPH 29 22 100 100NUR 102 74 100 100PHM 10 2 100 100Total 5,106 1,172 91 80
Bachelor's Degree Recipients in 2010-11 by Type of Entrance to UW-Madison (Freshman or Transfer)
Number of Graduates Percent of Graduates with at Least One Wisconsin Experience Activity
Freshman-Start Transfer- Start
Freshman-Start Transfer- Start
Post-Graduation Plans – at Graduation“How able were/are you to …”(Targeted Minorities and Non-Targeted Students)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Learn on your ownApply skills and knowledge of your chosen major(s)
Find, organize, and evaluate information from multiple sources
Draw conclusions after weighing evidence, facts, and ideas
Develop a personal code of ethics and values
Empathize w/ind. differences based on culture, ethnicity, disability or sexual orientation
Write Effectively
Apply knowledge and skills in real world settings
Use computers and electronic technologyUnderstand that science is relevant to everyday life
Lead others effectively
Work collaboratively in groups
Speak Effectively
Understand culture and society within the United States
Contribute to the welfare of others
Understand cultures and societies outside of the United States
Appreciate the arts such as literature, music, and fine arts
Communicate in a language other than English
1
2
3
4
5
Targeted Minority Non-Targeted
Post-Graduation Plans – at Graduation“How able were/are you to …”(First-Generation and Continuing Generation)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Learn on your ownApply skills and knowledge of your chosen major(s)
Find, organize, and evaluate information from multiple sources
Draw conclusions after weighing evidence, facts, and ideas
Develop a personal code of ethics and values
Empathize w/ind. differences based on culture, ethnicity, disability or sexual orientation
Write Effectively
Apply knowledge and skills in real world settings
Use computers and electronic technologyUnderstand that science is relevant to everyday life
Lead others effectively
Work collaboratively in groups
Speak Effectively
Understand culture and society within the United States
Contribute to the welfare of others
Understand cultures and societies outside of the United States
Appreciate the arts such as literature, music, and fine arts
Communicate in a language other than English
1
2
3
4
5
First Generation Continuing Generation
Post-Graduation Plans – at Graduation“How able were/are you to …”(Males and Females)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htmLearn on your own
Apply skills and knowledge of your chosen major(s)
Find, organize, and evaluate information from multiple sources
Draw conclusions after weighing evidence, facts, and ideas
Develop a personal code of ethics and values
Empathize w/ind. differences based on culture, ethnicity, disability or sexual orientation
Write Effectively
Apply knowledge and skills in real world settings
Use computers and electronic technologyUnderstand that science is relevant to everyday life
Lead others effectively
Work collaboratively in groups
Speak Effectively
Understand culture and society within the United States
Contribute to the welfare of others
Understand cultures and societies outside of the United States
Appreciate the arts such as literature, music, and fine arts
Communicate in a language other than English
1
2
3
4
5
Female Male
This section includes information on • Faculty and Staff by gender and by
race/ethnicity
Faculty and Staffhttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Num
ber o
f Fac
ulty
Perc
ent o
f Fac
ulty
Indicator 10: Women as a Percentage of all Faculty
2012 data available in December 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• In Fall 2011 31% of Faculty were women.
• 25.9% of Full Professors, 37.7% of Associate Professors, and 40.4% of Assistant Professors were women.
31%
Women as a Percentage of Faculty and Staff
2012 data available in December 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• Women make up just under 50% of all employees at UW-Madison.
• A smaller proportion of faculty members are women (31%)
Total Faculty Exec/Dir/ Ad-
min
Instructional Acad. Staff
Other Acad. Staff Classified0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Percent of Women Faculty and Staff by Employee Type
Employee Race/Ethnicity Data
Employees self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of hire.
Employees may choose any of the following designations, and may select two or more races as of 2009:
• White• Black• Asian• American Indian• Hispanic/ Latino/a• Hawaiian
Due to challenges arising from the conversion to HRS,Faculty/Staff Head Counts are not updated from the prioryear.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Indicator 11: Minority Faculty Recruitment
• Increases in the percent of faculty hires that are racial/ethnic minorities.
2010-11 Data is preliminary.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 100
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
UW-Madison Faculty Hires by Minority Status
Minority Faculty Non-Asian Minority Faculty
Year of Hire
Perc
ent
Madison Plan
Strategic Hires SHI - 2
Disciplinary Division Affiliation
• Selecting a divisional affiliation is a step in the tenure process. Faculty are not required to identify their divisional affiliation at the time of hire, but many do.
• Women, especially minority women, are heavily concentrated within the Social Studies Division
Note: Chart excludes 24 faculty members who have not yet selected a disciplinary division, as they are not required to do so until they go up for tenure. Data as of October 2010 payroll.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Minority Males Minority Female
Non-Minority Male
Non-Minority Female
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
3220
35 27
16 3214 29
3311
28 10
1937
2334
Faculty Disciplinary Divison Affiliation,by Minority Status and Gender
Social Studies
Physical Sciences
Arts and Humanities
Biological Sciences
Black, 2.2%
Asian, 10.9%
American Indian, 0.5%
Hispanic, 3.5%
Two or More Races, 0.6%
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Minority Faculty as a Percent of the Total Faculty Headcount
16.8%16.9%16.2%
13.2%13.8%
14.3% 14.6%15.1%
15.4%
17.6%
Indicator 12: Minority Faculty Representation
• In 2010: 2,177 total faculty members
• 17.6% (384) of Faculty are racial/ethnic minorities.
• 8% increase in minority faculty since 1996
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Instructional Academic Staff
• In 2010, 2,225 Instructional Academic Staff members
• 11.8% (263) of Instructional Academic Staff are racial/ethnic minorities
• 2.7% increase in minority instructional academic staff since 1996
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Minority Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount
11.7%12.1%
11.2%11.9%11.5%
10.5%9.8%
8.8%8.9%
Black,1.5% (34)
Asian,7.1% (159)
American Indian,.2% (5)
Hispanic/Latino/a,2.6% (57)
11.8%
Two or More Races,.4% (8)
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Minority Non-Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount
Hispanic/ Latino/a, 1.8% (90)
AmericanIndian, .5% (23)
Asian,8.0% (406)
Black,1.7% (85)
12%12%11.7%11.2%11.1%10.9%
10.2%9.6%9.4%
12.3%
Two or More Races,.5% (26)
Non-Instructional Academic Staff
• In 2010: 5,092 non-instructional Academic Staff
• 12.3% of non-instructional Academic Staff are minorities
• 3.7% increase in minority non-instructional academic staff since 1996
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Classified Staff
• In 2010: 5,410 Classified Staff members
• 12.9% (697) of classified staff are minorities
• 8.7% increase in minority classified staff since 1996
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Minority Classified Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount
12.6%12%11.8%11.3%
11%10%
9.1%8.5%8.1%
Hispanic/ Latino/a, 5.4% (291)American Indian,.3% (16)
Asian, 4.3% (233)
Black,2.4% (129)
12.9%
Two or More Races, 0.5% (28)
Executive/Director/Administrators
• In 2010: 410 Executive/Director/Administrators
• 11.9% of Executive/Director/Administrators are racial/ethnic minorities
• 1.4% increase in minority Executive/Director/Administrators since 1996.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Minority Executive/Director/Administrators as a Percent of the Total Headcount
Hispanic/Latino/a, 4.4% (18)American Indian, .7% (3)
Asian, 1.5% (6)
Black,4.9% (20)
11.2%11.6%11.2%11.2%10.8%10.8%11.1%
10.2%10.9%
11.9%
Two or More Races,.5% (2)
All Employee Groups
- Around 13% of all employees are minorities
- A larger proportion of faculty are minorities.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Total Faculty Exec/Dir/
Admin
Instructional Acad. Staff
Other Acad. Staff
Classified0%2%4%6%8%
10%12%14%16%18%20%
Percent of Minority Faculty and Staff by Employee Type
Peer Comparisons
for Faculty Diversity
Non-White Full-Time Faculty as a Percent of Total Full-Time Faculty at AAU Public Institutions, 2010-11
Source: IPEDS Fall HR, 2010-11 (AAUDE data)*2009-10 Numbers for Colorado.http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Average percent non-white faculty for AAU public institutions: 28%
UW-Madison: 17%
8 AAU public institutions have a lower number of non-white faculty.
WisconsinVirginiaOregonIndiana
WashingtonPenn State
North CarolinaColorado
KansasOhio State
UC-Santa BarbaraTexas A & M
FloridaNebraska
UC-BerkeleyStony Brook
IowaMichigan State
MissouriIllinois
BuffaloUC-San Diego
ArizonaUC-Davis
MinnesotaIowa State
Texas A & MRutgers
UCLAMaryland
PurdueUC-Irvine
PittsburghMichigan
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
N=545N=374
N=245N=488N=736N=670N=649
N=553*N=623N=804N=264N=637N=1,036N=411N=1578N=381N=601N=648N=785N=574N=408
N=705N=741
N=849N=1,223N=624N=637N=739N=1,097
N=1,028N=819N=662N=1.723
N=2,203
This section includes information on • Faculty and Tenure
Faculty and Tenurehttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Faculty Tenure Data
• Faculty who did not receive tenure include:– Those who were denied
tenure– Those who left the
university for another position elsewhere
– A few faculty members still hold probationary appointments after 9 years.
• Tenure and promotion rates are calculated at 6 and 9 years after hire, to account for those who have extensions on the tenure clock.
• Data combine hires from 1989-90 to 2004-05 or 1992-93 to 2004-05. This is necessary to account for small numbers of hires.
• Small Ns make tenure rates subject to large variation.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Notes about faculty tenure data:
Indicator 13: Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Gender
• At 9 years, 67% of women faculty have been promoted to tenure.Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1992-93 to 2005-06
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
6 Years 9 Years0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
54%
72%
42%
67%
Percent Promoted to Tenure by Gender,within Six (6) and Nine (9) YearsMen Women
Indicator 14: Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status
• At 9 Years, 66% of minority faculty members have been promoted to tenure.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1992-93 to 2005-06
6 Years 9 Years0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
50%
71%
48%
66%
Percent Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status, within Six (6) and Nine (9) YearsNon-Minority Minority
72%
81% 79%74%
57%64% 66%
81%
72%
48%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Total Physical Sciences Arts and Humanities
Biological Sciences Social Studies
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Gender and Division
Men Women
N=547
N=279
N=89N=144
N=29
N=93
N=190 N=74
N=124
N=83
Promotion to Tenure
• A lower percentage of women and men are promoted to tenure within the Social Studies.
• The largest gap in tenure rates by gender is within the Physical Sciences division.
Data on faculty hires from 1992-93 to 2004-05
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
66%
80%73%
68%
46%
71%79%
85%
75%
56%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Total Physical Sciences Arts and Humanities
Biological Sciences Social Studies
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Minority Status and Division
Minority Non-Minority
N=156
N=580 N=45
N=111
N=40
N=115
N=39N=200
N=32N=154
Promotion to Tenure
• A lower percentage of faculty members are promoted to tenure within the Social Studies division.
• The largest gap in tenure rates by minority status is within the Physical Sciences and Arts and Humanities.
Data on faculty hires from 1992-93 to 2004-05
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Tenure/Promotion Data
Data on faculty hires from 1992-93 to 2004-05
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• All groups have lower promotion rates within the Social Studies division.
• Women, and especially minority women, are more likely to be within the social studies division.
• For groups with small hiring pools, the effect of one person’s tenure/non-tenure can affect the percent tenured dramatically.
• Those not receiving tenure includes those who took a position elsewhere or still have a probationary appointment after 9 years.
Key findings from tenure/promotion data:
This section includes information on • Climate studies and surveys that include
climate-related questions
Climate Studies and Surveyshttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Climate Studieshttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• UW-Madison participated in UW System Climate Study (limited to CALS and Office of Student Life); reports are available in Fall 2012
• Letters & Science Climate Study was conducted in 2009-10; with linkages to STEM, teaching and learning communities
• NSSE Survey includes many climate-related questions, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2011
• WISELI Studies and Programs; on-going since 2002
Climate Studieshttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
UW-Madison Participation in the UW System Climate Study
• The UW System Climate Study was implemented at the request of the Board of Regents. Tier I was implemented by several UWs in 2008-09. Tier II was implemented in 2009-10. Tier III was implemented in 2010-11
• UW-Madison’s Climate Survey was fielded in February 2011; responses were anonymous and confidential
• Questionnaire went to all employees and students in CALS and Division of Student Life
• Reports are now available; see CALS E&D committee poster• More detail: http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity-climate.htm
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011
Selected NSSE 2011 Results
** significantly different
Percent of Seniors who often or very much:
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Tried to better understand someone else's views by imagining how it looks from their perspective
Included diverse perspectives in class discussion or assignments
Had serious conversations with student of a different race or ethnicity than your own
Understand people of other racial/ethnic backgrounds
75
63
71
55
66
56
49
56
67
57
52
56All
Non-Minority
Minority
**
**
See: http://apir.wisc.edu/students-surveys.htm
NSSE 2011
Selected NSSE 2011 ResultsPercent of Seniors for whom the university emphasizes quite a bit or very much:
See: http://apir.wisc.edu/students-surveys.htm
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds
Helping you cope with non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc)
Providing the support you need to thrive socially
Providing the support you need to succeed academically
44
25
40
71
47
21
41
72
46
22
41
72
AllNon-minorityMinority
Summary of Indicators
Indicators present in this report:1. Percent enrollment of minority undergraduate students2. Percent enrollment of targeted minority undergraduate students3. Percent enrollment of targeted minority graduate students4. Percent enrollment of targeted minority professional students5. Percent enrollment of Pell grant recipients6. Percent enrollment of first-generation students7. Percent enrollment of undergraduates by gender8. Percent enrollment of graduate/professional students by gender9. Retention/Graduation rates of targeted minorities, Pell grant recipients,
and first-generation students.10. Women as a percent of all Faculty11. Minority Faculty recruitment12. Minority Faculty representation13. Percent of Faculty promoted to tenure by gender14. Percent of Faculty promoted to tenure by minority status
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Diversity Update 2012
• Slideshow available at http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• Questions about these slides:– Sara Lazenby ([email protected])– Jocelyn Milner ([email protected])