distinguishing wellbore breathing from formation influx
TRANSCRIPT
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
1
www.geoservices.com
Distinguishing Well Breathing from Formation Influx
presented by
Mark HerkommerGeopressure Technology Center
Geoservices, A Schlumberger CompanyConroe, Texas
February, 2012
2 2
Central Theme – Wellbore Breathing
� Wellbore breathing (ballooning) or Formation Influx are identified during
connections when mud flowback is observed.
� Wellbore Breathing: If the mud weight is too high, when the pumps are switched on pressure applied to the formation can open fractures, which
then take fluid. Shutting the pumps off relieves the downhole pressure allowing the fractures to close and causes the mud to flow back into the wellbore.
� Formation Influx: If the mud weight is too low, when the pumps are switched off the loss of pressure can permit permeable formations to flow into the wellbore.
� An inappropriate response can worsen the problem and lead to lost circulation or a dangerous kick. Early diagnosis is the key.
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
2
3 3
Central Theme – Wellbore Breathing vs. Kick
4 4
Volume of FracturesFracture Volume in Barrels per 10' of
Formation Thickness
radial depth of penetration
fracture
widthinches
length
5 feetarea200 sqft
length10 feetarea
400 sqft
length20 feetarea
800 sqft
length40 feetarea1600 sqft
length
80 feetarea3200 sqft
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.6
0.2 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.6 3.2
0.3 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.4 4.7
0.4 0.4 0.8 1.6 3.2 6.3
0.5 0.5 1.0 2.0 4.0 7.9
0.6 0.6 1.2 2.4 4.7 9.5
0.7 0.7 1.4 2.8 5.5 11.1
0.8 0.8 1.6 3.2 6.3 12.7
0.9 0.9 1.8 3.6 7.1 14.2
1.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 7.9 15.8
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
3
6 6
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx: Detection Methods
�Pit Volume - Small to Severe Losses Detection
�Synchronized Event Display - Fingerprinting
�Pressure While Drilling – ECD Management
�Early Kick Detection - Differential Flow Rates
�Gas and Gas Ratios - Compositional Analysis
8 8
PVT behavior during a connection
Note rounding of Pit Volume Totalizer (PVT) curve as the wellbore returns
and accepts fluid when pumps are turned off and on Legend:Flow Rate (FR)Active Vol.
First
indication of wellbore
breathing
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
4
9 9
Suspected Well Breathing at 4647m
Losses at
4635m: high FR + high RPM
Losses at
4646m: incr. FR + high RPM
Losses at 4646m: high FR + high RPM
PVT Behavior While Drilling and During a
Connection
Legend:
Flow Rate (FR)Active Vol.
11 11
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx: Detection Methods
�Pit Volume - Small to Severe Losses Detection
�Synchronized Event Display - Fingerprinting
�Pressure While Drilling – ECD Management
�Early Kick Detection - Differential Flow Rates
�Gas and Gas Ratios - Compositional Analysis
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
5
13 13
Assessment of Normal Flow Back During Connection: Flowback Fingerprinting
Differential
flow shows amount of fluid
returned after the pumps are
stopped
14 14
Well Breathing
Abnormal Flow Back during Connections:
Well Breathing
Normal
Flow Back
Abnormal
Flow Back
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
6
15 15
Well Kicking
Abnormal Flow Back during Connections:
Well Kicking
Normal
Flow Back
Abnormal
Flow Back
4 minutes
16 16
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx: Detection Methods
�Pit Volume - Small to Severe Losses Detection
�Synchronized Event Display - Fingerprinting
�Pressure While Drilling – ECD Management
�Early Kick Detection - Differential Flow Rates
�Gas and Gas Ratios - Compositional Analysis
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
7
17 17
Abnormal ECD Response: Well Breathing
� Normal, square shaped ECD during
connection
� With increased ballooning the ECD
adopts a more curved appearance during flow back
� As ballooning worsens, the loss and gain become more rounded
Courtesy Sperry
18 18
Abnormal ECD Response: Well Kicking
� Increasing Connection Gas during each connection
� Increasing active pit levels
during influx and
corresponding ECD response
Courtesy Sperry
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
8
19 19
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx: Detection Methods
�Pit Volume - Small to Severe Losses Detection
�Synchronized Event Display - Fingerprinting
�Pressure While Drilling – ECD Management
�Early Kick Detection - Differential Flow Rates
�Gas and Gas Ratios - Compositional Analysis
20 20
Abnormal EKD response: Well Breathing
The alarm is green :
nothing to notice.
The flow given by
the flowmeter matches the
theoretical flow out
Abnormally high
return at pump stop.
Warning status.
Losses mitigated with LCM :
Fractures only opening when pump start.
Return volume increasing
with depth: consistent with
fracture enlargement.
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
9
21 21
Abnormal EKD Response: Well Kicking
22 22
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx: Detection Methods
�Pit Volume - Small to Severe Losses Detection
�Synchronized Event Display - Fingerprinting
�Pressure While Drilling – ECD Management
�Early Kick Detection - Differential Flow Rates
�Gas and Gas Ratios - Compositional Analysis
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
10
25 25
Underbalanced drilling: Swabbing/Influx
� Formation at higher pressure than static mud column
� During connection, All the gases are exchanged between formation and mud in hole
� No or minor change in gas ratio because the gas is the same composition as the drilled gas
� Time of exchange is limited to Pump Off time : 5-10 min
26 26
Conditions for Well Breathing
� Some mud losses must have occurred, prior the well breathing.
� Losses are due to fractures induced by the ECD (not losses in a permeable formation with lower pressure)
� Hydrostatic pressure (ESD) at TD is below the closing fracture gradient.
� Increasing MW does not stop the PCG, and possibly make them worse.
� Severe or total losses can be expected, if MW is raised above the fracture closing pressure.
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
11
27 27
What Happens During Well Breathing
� At pump off time, fracture closes slowly,
mud flows back to hole
� Multiples fractures at various depth may have been induced or re-opened.
� Mud is charged mostly with light gases
� High gas peak may be expected
� High PCG observed, but with light gases.
Minor increase of the heavier gases C4-C5.
� Time of exchange : during the pumping time, i.e. several hours
28 28
Volume of FracturesFracture Volume in Barrels per 10' of
Formation Thickness
radial depth of penetration
fracture
widthinches
length
5 feetarea200 sqft
length10 feetarea
400 sqft
length20 feetarea
800 sqft
length40 feetarea1600 sqft
length
80 feetarea3200 sqft
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.6
0.2 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.6 3.2
0.3 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.4 4.7
0.4 0.4 0.8 1.6 3.2 6.3
0.5 0.5 1.0 2.0 4.0 7.9
0.6 0.6 1.2 2.4 4.7 9.5
0.7 0.7 1.4 2.8 5.5 11.1
0.8 0.8 1.6 3.2 6.3 12.7
0.9 0.9 1.8 3.6 7.1 14.2
1.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 7.9 15.8
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
12
29 29
How Gas Moves From a Formation
Into the Drilling Fluid
� INFLUX: Darcy Flow – Gas flow through a porous media under the influence of a pressure differential between the
formation and the drilling fluid
� WELLBORE BREATHING: Diffusion Flow – Gas flow through
a saturated porous media under the influence of a concentration gradient between the formation and the drilling
fluid
35 35
Gas Peaks Composition: Well Breathing
Evolution toward
lighter composition with same EMW
Evolution toward
lighter composition with same EMW
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
13
36 36
Gas Peak Composition: Well Kicking
No relationship
between compositions before
the kick – even, FG becoming lighter
New (much heavier) composition for the kick
37 37
Gas Ratios – Well Breathing/Ballooning
Pipe Connection Gas
is high and rich in light components
and strong changes
of gas ratios
Gas Ratios
Purple – Balance
Blue – Wetness
543
21
CCC
CCBh
++
+=
54321
5432 100)(
CCCCC
CCCCWh
++++
×+++=
Balance
Wetness
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
14
38 38
Gas Ratios – Well Kicking/Swabbing
Pipe Connection
Gas peaks are sharp and affect all gas
components without
change in gas ratio
Gas Ratios
Purple – Balance
Blue– Wetness
543
21
CCC
CCBh
++
+=
54321
5432100)(
CCCCC
CCCCWh
++++
×+++=
Balance
Wetness
39 39
� When to suspect well breathing
� Section with a very tight MW window � ECD is close to the weakest formation in the open hole section
(weakest point not always at the shoe) � Losses were observed during the section
� Well Breathing Indicators
� Abnormal Flowback, but stabilizing� Pit behavior during medium to severe well breathing� ECD shape has rounded character
� EKD shows losses, followed by an equal gain
� PCG gas composition enriched in lighter components compared to background gas and may not arrive on
time
Well Breathing Identification – Conclusions
Distinguishing Well Breathing from
Formation Influx
February, 2012
© Copyright, 2012. All Rights Reserved.Geoservices, A Schlumberger Company
Conroe, Texas
15
40 40
� When to suspect well influx (kick)
� Section with a very tight MW window � ESD is close highest formation pore pressure in the open hole
section
� Well Influx Indicators
� Abnormal Flowback and NOT stabilizing� Pit behavior shows gain without prior loss� ECD shape has square-ish (normal) character� EKD shows gain without prior losses
� PCG gas composition is similar to background gas and will tend to arrive on time
Well Influx Identification – Conclusions
www.geoservices.com
Thank you for your attention.
QUESTIONS...