discussion proposal sptf meeting bern, june 2010 towards a social performance certification system

17
Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

Upload: clarence-whitehead

Post on 03-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

Discussion Proposal

SPTF MeetingBern, June 2010

Towards a Social Performance Certification System

Page 2: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

Contents

1) Why do we need a social performance certification system? 2) SP: What have we done, and what is missing?3) What is the SPCS? What are its main objectives?4) What are the main features and the scope of the SPCS?5) What are the components of the SPCS ?6) What is the outline of the standardization, accreditation and

certification process?7) What areas are standardized and certified?8) The SP certification seal in microfinance9) What are the benefits for certified MFIs?10) What are the benefits for clients, social investors and other

stakeholders?11) Concerns12) SPCS implementation phases

Page 3: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

• To differentiate the fulfillment of MFIs’ social role from other types of mandates, missions and goals.

• To demonstrate consistency betweeen mission and results – does not mean having “good social performance”.

• Generalization has led to doubts and interventions (contradictory regulatory frameworks, reduced funding sources) that affect the sustainability and progress achieved in favor of the poorest and most vulnerable.

• All interventions are valuable and operating strategies can be similar BUT it is important to differentiate between motivations and destinations of intervention benefits. Profit vs. social and economic development of the poorest and most vulnerable, etc.

• To recognize and reward MFIs that achieve certification.

Why do we need a SP Certification

System?

Page 4: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

SP: What have we done and what is missing?

What?

INDICATORSStandards

CONCEPTSNorms & Codes of Conduct

SYMBOLIC RECOGNITION

Rewards, Incentives

SOCIALRATING

Accreditation & Certification

Page 5: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

What is the SP Certification System?

A set of norms, processes and mechanisms certifying that a MFI plays a social development role and achieves results consistent with this mandate.

Its main objectives are:

•Institute a SP Certification Seal to identify, value and differentiate MFIs with a social development mission and focus from those that prioritize seeking financial inclusion and/or demonstrating socially responsible management.

•Promote the adoption of principles, standards and best practices aimed at continuously improving, and ensuring the sustainability of interventions by MFIs focused on social development.

Page 6: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

SPCS: Aim, Stakeholders and Processes?

MFIs

Certifying Agencies:

(Rating agencies, MFI certifying

agencies)

Norms, Accreditation &

Standards:Working Groups

Certification & Reward:

Technical Committees

Social Investors, Cooperating

Agencies

Page 7: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

SPCS Main Features and Scope

What type of MFIs are subject to certification?

What is certified?

MFIs stating a social mission and interventions focused on the social and economic development of the poorest and/or most vulnerable. (Non-profit-making organizations).

o Approaches and results consistent with a social mission and development focus, as well as socially responsible management.

o Not Social Performance Management processes or tools, although their legitimacy in generating stated results is valued.

Page 8: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

1. STANDARDIZATION• Universally applied standards defined by consensus in a Global Working Group involving all stakeholders

• Parameters used to assess compliance with standards are validated by National-Level Working Groups involving all stakeholders

2. CERTIFICATIONProcesses and agencies that assess/validate compliance with standards

and award the SP Certification Seal

3. ACCREDITATIONMechanism that guarantees the technical capacity and objectivity of

certifying agencies or other entities responsible for carrying out the certification process and awarding the SP Certification Seal. The creation of an Accreditation Board will be considered.

What are the components of the

SPCS?

Page 9: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

Standardization, Accreditation & Certification Process Outline

Certified MFI

CERTIFICATION Certifying Agency

ACCREDITATIONAccreditation Board

NORMS

STANDARDIZATIONWorking Groups

Page 10: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

Standardized and Certified Areas Process

Results

• POVERTY• GENDER• RURAL AREAS

• POVERTY• GENDER• RURAL AREAS

Intention & Design

Internal Systems

and Activities

Outputs Results Impact

•REDUCED VULNERABILITY•PROMOTION PRODUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT•CONSOLID. SOCIAL CAPITAL

•REDUCED VULNERABILITY•PROMOTION PRODUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT•CONSOLID. SOCIAL CAPITAL

CONSUMER PROTECTIONCOMMUNITY SR & ENVIRONMENT PERSONAL SR/WORKING CONDITIONS

CONSUMER PROTECTIONCOMMUNITY SR & ENVIRONMENT PERSONAL SR/WORKING CONDITIONS

FOCUS

IMPACT

SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

SP Seal

Page 11: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

Social Performance Seal in Microfinance

• The SP Seal in Microfinance certifies one or more MFI development approaches, one or more impacts and/or one or more areas of social responsibility. While achieving certification in all areas is not a requirement, efforts made to meet all the standards proposed are recognized.

• The SP Seal in Microfinance accredits the MFI with its stakeholders, recognizing that it voluntarily takes on the commitment to fulfill its social mission and development role.

• The SP Seal commits the MFI to the continuous improvement of its social role – not the end of a process but rather the beginning or ratification of a commitment with its stakeholders, particularly its clients.

Page 12: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

Benefits for Certified MFIs

• Continuous improvement and social role sustainability benchmarks and tools

• Client and social investor attraction, loyalty and retention

• Strengthening of MFI image – certification differentiates the MFI as a leader in SP best practices

• Opportunity to communicate and generate SP culture internally and externally

Page 13: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

Benefits for Clients, Social Investors and other Stakeholders

CLIENTS•Access to services that rather than prioritizing profit-making

focus on making a positive impact on social and economic conditions.

• Identification of MFIs focused on and specializing in their specific needs.

•Certainty that rights and interests are effectively protected.

SOCIAL INVESTORS, GOVERNMENT & OTHERS•Opportunity to target interventions and monitor impact.

Page 14: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

Concerns

Should new organizations be created? The recommendation is to articulate and link interventions by existing organizations (networks, rating agencies, support organizations) rather than creating new ones, because of the costs involved and because it is not necessary.

New conceptualization or adoption of existing conceptualization? Adoption and ownership of conceptual development generated at SPTF level, seeking to build on progress achieved.

Additional duties and costs for MFIs or refocusing of current duties and costs? Functioning of the SPCS should not involve additional duties or costs for MFIs.

Complete proposal or discussion proposal? This proposal is submitted for discussion and feedback from all those interested in the issues addressed.

Page 15: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

SPCS Implementation Phases

1) Designing / validating universally-recognized standards and certification processes (awarding SP Certification Seal)

2) Adapting parameters based on local context and implementation – piloting in 3 countries

3) Defining accreditation mechanism for certifying agencies and implementation of SPCS

Page 16: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

THANK YOU!

Page 17: Discussion Proposal SPTF Meeting Bern, June 2010 Towards a Social Performance Certification System

What is the current state of microfinance

in LAC?

DETAIL MFIs VC MFIs MS EFC/EFP Status Corporations

Civil Associations & Foundations

Corporations Civil Associations & Foundations

Cooperatives Purpose Profit-making Non-profit-making Other Focus Commercialization

of microfinance Reaching poor and vulnerable clients

Autonomous development ofclients

Regulation Regulated Non-Regulated (exceptions)

Regulated & Non-Regulated

Market Urban -uRural & Periurban Rural Main Clients

Microenterprises

Microenterprises Women

Peasants & Farmers

Services & Products

Microcredit, savings, SAF

Microcredit & Community Banking

Investment funding, SAF