discrimination complaint to the lancaster county human relations commission discrimination complaint...

Advanced Media Group of 194 08/22/2007

ORDINANCE NO. 64

On motion of Commissioner Shaub seconded by Commissioner Ford

WHEREAS, the County of Lancaster has fostered the cause of those civil rights protected by state and federal law by providing for a Lancaster City-County Human Relations Commission, as set forth in Resolution No. 45 of 1964; and

WHEREAS, in order to effectuate and accomplish the goals and objectives set forth in Resolution No. 45 of 1964, the County of Lancaster granted appropriate enforcement powers under state law to the Lancaster City-County Human Relations Commission as set forth in Ordinance No. 28 of 1991; and

WHEREAS, in order to effectuate and accomplish the goals and objectives as set forth in Ordinance No. 28 of 1991, the County of Lancaster withdrew from the Lancaster City-County Human Relations Commission and established a human relations commission under its own jurisdiction with appropriate enforcement powers as set forth in Ordinance No. 30 of 1991; and

WHEREAS, in order to effectuate and accomplish the goals set forth in Ordinance No. 30 of 1991, it is necessary for the County of Lancaster to (1) expand the powers of the Lancaster County Human Relations Commission to provide procedures, rights and remedies that are substantially equivalent to those provided in the Fair Housing Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq., for the purpose of enforcing said Act on behalf of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; (2) incorporate in said Ordinance certain amendments made to the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act since the passage of said Ordinance; and (3) authorize the Lancaster County Human Relations Commission to seek the necessary authorization from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to enforce the Fair Housing Act on behalf of said Department, and enter into worksharing agreements with said Department, the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED AND ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of Lancaster County AND IT IS HEREBY ENACTED AND ORDAINED BY AUTHORITY OF THE SAME as follows:

Ordinance No. 30 of 1991, dated August ! ". 19°:, is hereby amended, to (1) provide procedures, rights and remedies thai a^c substantially equivalent to those provided in the Fair Housing Act. as amended. 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq., for

1


the purpose of enforcing said Act on behalf of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, (2) incorporate certain amendments made to the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act since the passage of said Ordinance, and (3) authorize the Lancaster County Human Relations Commission to seek the necessary authorization from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to enforce the Fair Housing Act on behalf of said Department, and enter into worksharing agreements with said Department, the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission and the Equal Opportunity Commission as follows:

SECTION 1.

SECTION 2.

SECTION 3.

SECTION 4.

SECTIONS.

SECTION 6.

SECTION 7.

SECTION 8.

SECTION 9.

SECTION 10.

SECTION 11.

SECTION 12.

SECTION 13.

SECTION 14.

SECTION 15.

SECTION 16.

Findings and Declaration of Policy

Scope and Application

Right to Freedom From Discrimination in Employment, Housing, Education, Public Accommodations, Lending Practices and Real Estate Practices

Definitions

Lancaster County Human Relations Commission

Powers and Duties of the Commission

Investigatory Hearings Related to Racial or Ethnic Problems

Unlawful Employment Practices

Unlawful Housing Practices

Unlawful Educational Practices

Unlawful Public Accommodations Practices

Unlawful Real Estate Practices

Injunctions

Procedure

Retaliation. Encouragement of Unlawful Practices and Obstruction of Commission Orders Prohibited

Enforcement and Judicial Review


SECTION 17. Authorization to Receive Donations

SECTION 18. Penalties

SECTION 19. Separability

SECTION 20. Repeal of Inconsistent Provisions of Prior Resolutions

and Ordinances

SECTION 21. Right of Action in Court

SECTION 22. Effective Date

SECTION 1. FINDINGS AND DECLARATION OF POLICY

(a) The population of the County of Lancaster consists of people representing a broad spectrum of diversity. The practice or policy of discrimination against individuals or groups by reason of their race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, familial status, possession of general education diploma, handicap or disability or use of a guide or support animal because of physical handicap because of the handicap or disability of the user is a matter of concern to the County. Such discrimination encourages domestic strife and social unrest, while threatening the rights and privileges of all the inhabitants of the County.

Employment discrimination deprives persons of earnings necessary to maintain decent standards of living, tends to impair the County's productive capacity, reduces public revenues and contributes to group tensions and conflicts. Housing discrimination results in overcrowded, segregated areas which tends to promote substandard, unsafe and unsanitary living conditions. These adverse conditions foster crime, vice, juvenile delinquency and similar evils which are all detrimental to the welfare of the County.

Discrimination in educational institutions precludes equal opportunities. Lack of equal education opportunity impedes the students' abilities to compete for gainful employment when the educational phase is completed.

Discrimination in places of public accommodation causes humiliation, embarrassment and is an inconvenience to citizens and visitors alike.

(b) It is hereby declared to be the policy of the County of Lancaster to promote the right and opportunity of all persons to participate in the


(k) Render from time to time, but not less than once a year, a written report of its activities and recommendations to the Board of Commissioners of Lancaster County.

(1) Adopt, promulgate, amend or rescind such rules and regulations, as may be necessary, to carry out the purposes and provisions of this Ordinance.

(m) Seek the necessary authorization from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to enforce the Fair Housing Act and enter into a work-sharing agreement with the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

SECTION 7. INVESTIGATORY HEARINGS RELATED TO RACIAL OR ETHNIC PROBLEMS

(a) Whenever any problem of racial or ethnic discrimination or racial or ethnic tension arises, the Commission may immediately hold investigatory hearings. The place of any such hearings may be held anywhere in the County that a problem arises. The hearings may be public or private and the Commission shall have the same powers as provided in this Ordinance for hearings on a complaint.

(b) The purpose of the hearings shall be to resolve the situation promptly by the gathering of all the facts from all interested parties and making such recommendations as may be necessary. Should the recommendations of the Commission not be accepted within a reasonable time, the Commission may, with the consent of the majority of members, on its own behalf initiate a complaint based upon the findings resulting from the hearings and thereafter the procedure shall be as set forth in Sections 14 and 16 herein.

SECTION 8. UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES

It shall be an unlawful discriminatory employment practice, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification or applicable security regulation established by the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or the County of Lancaster:

(a) For any employer to refuse to hire any person or -otherwise to discriminate against any person with respect to hiring, tenure, compensation, promotion, discharge, or other terms, conditions or privileges directly or indirectly related to employment because of race, color, religion,

15


ancestry, national origin, sex, age, non-job related handicap or disability or the use of a guide or support animal because of the blindness, deafness or physical handicap of any individual or independent contractor, if the individual is the best able and most competent to perform the services required.

The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to (1) operation of the terms or conditions of any bona fide retirement or pension plan which has the .effect of a minimum service requirement; (2) operation of the terms or conditions of any bona fide group or employee insurance plan; or (3) age limitations placed upon entry into bona fide apprenticeship programs of two years or more approved by the State Apprenticeship and Training Council of the Department of Labor and Industry. Notwithstanding any provision of this subsection, it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for a religious corporation or association to hire or employ on the basis of sex in those certain instances where sex is a bona fide occupational qualification because of the religious beliefs, practices, or observances of the corporation or association.

(b) For any employer, employment agency or labor organization, prior to employment or admission to membership, to elicit any information or make or keep a record of or use any form of application or application blank containing questions or entries concerning the race, color, religious creed, ancestry, age, sex, national origin, past handicap or disability or the use of a guide or support animal because of the blindness, deafness or physical handicap of any applicant for employment or membership. Prior to an offer of employment, an employer may not inquire as to whether an individual has a handicap or disability or as to the severity of such handicap or disability. An employer may inquire as to the individual's ability to perform the essential functions of the employment.

(c) For an employer, employment agency or labor organization to publish or circulate or to cause to be published or circulated, any notice or advertisement relating to employment or membership which indicates any discrimination because of race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, sex, age, non-job related handicap or disability, the use of a guide or support animal because of the blindness, deafness or physical handicap of the user.

(d) For any employment agency to fail or refuse to classify properly or refer to employment or otherwise to discriminate against any person because of race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, sex, age, non-job related handicap or disability, the use of a guide or support animal because of the blindness, deafness or physical handicap of the user.

16


University, Hahnemann University, Thomas Jefferson University, the Medical College of

Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania College of Podiatric Medicine, Pennsylvania

College of Optometry, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia University, and

University of the Arts.

(h) When considering any matter brought before it with respect to any alleged

unfair educational practice based on sex, the Commission shall take into consideration the

educational pro grams offered by the institution and the number of admissions necessary to

maintain programs and departments at educationally and economically feasible levels.

SHCT1ON 1 1. UNLAWFUL PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS PRACTICES

It shall be an unlawful public accommodation practice for any person being the owner,

lessee, proprietor, manager, superintendent, agent or employee for any place of public

accommodation to:

(a) refuse, withhold from or deny to any person because of that person's race, color,

religion, ancestry, national origin, sex, handicap or disability, use of a guide or support animal

because of the blindness, deafness or physical handicap of the user or because the user is a

handle)' or trainer of support or guide animals, cither directly or-indirectly, any ol the

accommodations, advantages, facilities, services or privileges, products or goods of such place of

public accommodation;

(b) publish, circulate, issue, display, post or mail, either directly or indirectly, any

written or printed communication, notice or advertisement to the effect that any of the

accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, products, services and privileges of any such place

shall be refused, withheld or denied to any person because of race, color, religion, ancestry,

national origin, sex, handicap or disability, use of a guide or support animal because of the

blindness, deafness or physical handicap of the user or because the user is a handler or trainer of

support or guide animals, or that the patronage of any person of any particular race, color, religion,

ancestry, national origin, sex, handicap or disability, or to any person due to use of a guide or

support animal because of the ' blindness, deafness or physical handicap or because the user is a

handler or trainer of support or guide animals, is unwelcome, objectionable, or not acceptable,

desired or solicited;

(e) construct, operate or otherwise make available such place of public

accommodation which is not accessible; or


1

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com mailto:[email protected]

717.731.8184 Phone 717.427-1621 Fax

Stan Caterbone Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516

February 8, 2007

Nelson Brewster Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office Civil Rights Enforcement Section 14th Floor Strawberry Square Harrisburg. PA 17120 RE: Complaint received in the Civil Rights Enforcement Section (CRES) on July 21,2006 Dear Mr. Brewster: In addition to the Complaint that you had received on July 21, 2006, I would like to add the following Employment related complaints regarding discrimination, and other causes of actions regarding my Civil Rights1. Attached are several applications for employment, my resume, and several communications via email soliciting employment with potential opportunities for employment. As you can see, I have applied for employment at a wide variety of companies, including the City of Lancaster and the County of Lancaster. All of these applications occurred from approximately October of 2006 and this date. I am alleging that due to the fact that I would have accepted any position, even that of a clerk at both Turkey Hill and McDonalds, I have been subject to a vast array of discrimination towards a Whistle Blower2, and discrimination3 for my political views and beliefs.

1 §1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: “The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from federal interference”, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 241, 242; U.S.C.A. – Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, § 2: 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A. 2 In the case of United States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the following: “Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an indictment and it’s proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan”. This illustrates the legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to cover-up my International Signal & Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities. 3 §1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: “The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from federal interference”, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 241, 242; U.S.C.A. – Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, § 2: 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.


2

I was denied an application at McDonalds on the Millersville Pike on more than 4 occasions, and was only allowed to submit an Employment Interest Form. This all occurred over the last 45 days. I was also denied interviews at all places of employment. I had submitted resumes to several of the more professional employers.

There is no excuse for this behavior given the fact that I have never failed at any business endeavor in my life. My professional accomplishments are truthful and honest and I challenge you or anyone to find otherwise. I hope to hear from you in the very near future. I appreciate your help regarding these serious allegations. Respectfully, Stan J. Caterbone Advanced Media Group Cc: file enclosure


Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road

Conestoga, PA 17516 www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

[email protected]

717.427-1621 Fax

1984 To 1987 In 1984/85 We had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President of Citi Group (the largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to help advise on the future of Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the investment industry at large. Mr. Weil was performing due diligence for the merger of American Express and IDS (Investors Diversified Services). We were at that time a national leader in the company in delivering Fee Based Financial Planning Services, which was a new concept in the investment community and mainstream investors. That concept is now widely held by most investment advisors. In 1985/86 We were elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4 times. We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial Planner, Ms. Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150 professionals attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work together in order to be most effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals including; brokers, lawyers, accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners, bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has become evident that financial planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us from Blue Ball National Bank to help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank. In 1985 we developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting departments. (See Washington Post ¾ page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were dependant on the team scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed a strategy of video taping the camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all of the scouting departments for teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was signed at that camp by the Ottawa Roughriders of the CFL, and went on to be a leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2 years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino was starting quarterback. We were a Certified Agent for the National Football League Players Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp, while we were at a Conference for agents of the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article about our camp and


associated it with other camps that were questionable about their practices. Actually, that was the very reason for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the country that were not very well organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants, with one player coming from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a professional production company filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video. The well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys, had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him and said he looked forward to reviewing the tapes for any hopeful recruits. * In 1986 We had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services organization comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had developed a stock purchase program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new firm. FMG had financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys, realtors, liability insurance services, tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of our corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we had 24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices in Pennsylvania, and several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and our advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees from the other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at about $3 to $4 million. In 1987 We had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a major banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100 million dollars. Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations from developers across the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to raise capital that include both debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity funding through private placements, and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We had secured refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the midst of replacing the current loan that was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and discussions with Drew Anton of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We also had a number of other prominent local developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We were constantly told that our financing packages were more completive than local institutions. In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York retained me as executive producer of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format; the first of it’s kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept for the Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and marketing formula of the DOLBY technology trademark. We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording industry featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of Philadelphia was the lead patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station Studios was the


brainchild of Tony Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was 15. Tony and Power Station Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were responsible for developing Bon Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper, Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station Studios had produced the original Sound Track for the original “Star Wars” motion picture. It was released for distribution and was the number one Sound Track recording of its time. Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We had developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the Digital Movie and it’s related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the commercialization of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry simultaneously with the release of the Digital Movie. I also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the technology, similar to the DOLBY sound system’s trademark. The acronym’s stand for the Power Station Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a portable medium, a compact disc. 1988 To 1998 In 1989 We had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with commercial companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies. I performed services and contracts for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of Standards & Technology (NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft, AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, and a host of others. I also was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing various interactive mapping technologies, which is now a major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is the premier provider of mapping software and applications for the internet and is often used in delivering maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for High Industries to sell American Helix, the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly. We had brokered a deal and the executives from Donnelly’s Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to discuss the deal and perform due diligence of the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield Industrial Park. 1990 - 1991 We had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the government’s technology think tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). I co-authored the article “Escaping the Unix Tar Pit” with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine “DISC”, then one of the leading publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy that technology whenever you call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types of applications involving telecommunications.


In 1991 We were elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador Program, which was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was founded to “To give specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and effectively communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face scientific, technical, and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F. Kennedy, the State Department established a non-profit private foundation to administer the program. We were scheduled to tour the ***iet Union and Eastern Europe to discuss printing and publishing technologies with scientists and technicians around the world. 1993 We were retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible for saving the company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts, the company was facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We were responsible for implementing computerized accounting, accounting and contract policies and procedures, human resource policies and procedures, marketing strategies, performance measurement reporting, and negotiate for the payment of unpaid contracts. The bonding company was especially problematic, since it was the lifeline to continue work and bidding for public contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County demanded a complete accounting of the operations in order to stave off a default on the notes and loans it was holding. We essentially revamped the entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its previous years, and record revenues. 1998 We had began to administer the charity giving of Tom’s Project Hope, a non-profit organization promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We had provided funding for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide Prevention Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable organizations and faith based charities. 1999 to 2005 In 1999 We contributed to the debate, research, and implementation of strategies to counter the effects of the global Y2K threat to the worlds computer technologies. We attended the U.S. Sponsored Y2K symposium and Conference in Washington, D.C. hosted by the Senate Y2K Subcommittee and Senator William Bennett. * In 1999 We developed a comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery, known as the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan was developed in conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the Revitalization of Downtown Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the former Watt & Shand building.


In 2000 to 2002 We developed an array of marketing and communication tools for wholesalers of the AIM Investment Group and managed several communication programs for several of the company wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa Rica. We also began a Day Trading project that lasted until 2004 with success. In 2004 We embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment industries with an emphasis on assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of artists rights and royalties in the fight against electronic piracy. We have attempted to assist in developing new business models to address the convergence of physical and electronic mediums; as it displaces royalties and revenues for those creating, promoting, and delivering a range of entertainment content via wireless networks. We also began our philanthropic endeavors working with such organizations as ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton Global Initiative, Lancaster Convention Authority, Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Tom’s Project Hope, People to People International, GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide Hotline, Schreiber Pediatric Center, and others.


McDonald'se Employment Interest Form Fill this out and return to this McDonald's Restoura~t Monager.

Area Code Phone Number

Have you everworkgd in o McDonald's Rertouront before? If yes, datesand location-

AVAILABILITY: , . Total hours available per week Y a - Doyr and times available .e L ~ E W I ~ ~ & 1) - ~ U Z Z Z ~ B ~ Are you olderthon 188 ~ e r ~ ~ o If not, birth date - - A 4 p u legally able to be employedin the U.S.? Yes N o - How did you hear of iob? U I ( I C ~ C How hr do you live from restourorit? 3 s b c b s Do you hove transportation? $!5s

/

SCHOOL MOST RECENTLY ATTENDED:

Nomc

Sbset Address 4 city &,LLH l d ~ u d state y4 L ~ r t Grode Completed - Grode point ~*ero@e k ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ t ~ d ? Y ~ ~ & ~ -

Now Enmlled? Yes - No - Sports or Activities

. Job Supervisar

Dater Worked: From Salary

Reason For learing-A/!!

If contacted, you will be required to complete an employment application. llyou would rother

submit on opplicotion now, ask for one of the front counter Return completed opplimtion fo 0

Manager ot this McDonold'r Restaurant.

THANK YOU FOR SHOPPING

P r i c I t a n UQ C A K E M I X 1 19

W Q R T S F R O S T 1 29

W Q N O O D L E S WC 9 3

CLUB C U S T O M E R 40041 3890 W Q NOODLES DISC 1 4

t * x t T R X 00 B A L 3 27 < ,, 7 S . L I

Cash ,.A

CHANGE . UU

Wels C l u b S s v i n s s T o t a l . . . . . , . . . yout- ~ o t a l S a v l n s s o r e 4 . 1 1 % .id

1 / 2 1 / 0 1 5 . 1 0 P M 5 0 4 1 5 0 1 0 2 8 2 4 2 2

TZ 9 - m . mu, -I= a*< OAaO N Z X

W Z W - z * 0 0 - OI

0 7 2 m - r W8 7 z 0 2 rt 0 3

9 ' g h 8 a

m b

rn D W ' U + m a

g oco 7 3 0 - -~ -. O.+Z m

I

C -5 2 2%r$E

C Yg:' oooox wutnm= 40-3 z A n m 3

W U 1 X a , m r w g8 -cZ

w 3 - '-7 0

m

'D Advanced Media Group of 194 08/22/2007

Em Application for Employment Weis Markets is committed to a policy of Equal Employment Opportunity and will not discriminate against an applicant or employee on the basis of actual or perceived age, sex, sexual orientation, race, coior, creed, religion, familial status, ethnicity, national origin, alienage or citizenship, disability, marital status, military or veteran status, or any other legally recognized protected basis under federal, state or local laws, regulations or ordinances. Applicants with a disability may be entitled to reasonable accommodation under terms of the Americans with Disabilities Act and certain state or local laws. A reasonable accommodation is a change in the way things are normally done which will ensure an equal employment opportunity without imposing undue hardship on Weis Markets. Please inform a Company representative if you need assistance completing any forms or to otherwise participate in the application process. This application will remain active for 60 days, after 60 days, you must reapply for further consideration.

PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY (USE PEN ONLY)

DATE

NAME S T A ~ fir t

3 - middle initial

ADDRESS 1 2 bast f%Km~k street AT. hllmm state 17&03 cihi zio

TELEPHONE ( ) baa6 SOCIAL SECURITY NO. $00 -+ area code number

b - 0 4 n

Are you under the age of 18? YESGAO If yes, please state your age

Are you legally authorized to work in the United States? Y E S ~ N O q (If hired, verification will be requlred consistent wlth federal law)

Have you ever been convicted of a felony which has not been expunged or sealed by a court? YESO NO R E C O R ~

You should answer "no record" if a conviction has been sealed or expunged or otherwise statutorily eradicated. If you checked yes, please explain below. If more space is required, please use separate sheet. A criminal conviction wll l not necessarily be a bar to employment. To help us evaluate your application, please describe the nature of the crime and your subsequent rehabilitation.

How were you referred to us? ~dver t i sementn Weis employeen Walked in&hooln

Employment Agency0 State Employment Office[? O t h e r 0 (specify)

I

Position($ applied for u\/ Date you can start MU^ Y l manthldaylyear

Wages desired? $ per hour, or $ per week

We are a 7-day-a-week business with emphasis on nights and weekends. Please indicate your availability below:

Full T i m e w Part T i m e 0 (How many hours? )

~ a ~ s m ~ v e n i n ~ s m ~ i ~ h t s B ~ e e k e n d s B

Put the specific hours (Fromno) you are available for work in the boxes below. (Leave the box empty if you are not available at all that day and write " A under any day you are "available" all that day without any scheduling restrictions.)

Form #45 Revised 6-1-04

From (AMIPM)

To (AMIPM)

SUN MON TU E WED THU FRI SAT


Name and location of school I Circle highest year I Graduated I DegreelMajor comoleted

Are you now enrolled? Y E S ~ NOE If yes, name and location of school

Availability during school vacations: FULL^ PART^ NONE 1 Other education, training, skills or hobbies relevant to employment cons~derat~on

Hlgh School or GED NAME: L. P. d. 5 ADDRESS LhUhCb College or Un~vers~ty NAME: IZA 1-a~ 0 ADDRESS tt.i r u I&,& Other (Spec~fy) NAME: ADDRESS

'Beginning with the most recent employment, list the last four employers (including military service) or cover at least a seven year period, whichever is longer. Use separate sheet if necessary.

9 10 11 @

FR SO A3 @ 1 2 3 4

Previous Em~lover Phone f ) l From TO

YES

YES &y NO

YES NO

C rent or Most Rec nt Employer AD i//krcbrf J&o C& *UP

tate Zip +r ~7 ClG

Pre us Employer Phone ( u u / - t t q i k ? r - 7 M

L City State Zip [I 5Si( I sub-

)

Street /?h< d1&&9~&

Zip t7ko f

. , I MO. Y r. MO. Y r. Street I Base Salary or Wage

From To Mo. ~ r 1 4 90 MO. ~ r a 7 Base Salary or Wage Starting Ending Supervisor's Name

Reason for leaving

From ~ 0 , J * h ) y r , / ~ 9 ~ ~ o , ~ i 1'748 Base Salary or Wage Starting Ending 3s Supervisor's Name

f r Ieavirs Reasw te0 Gc;T From Mo. Yr. Base Salary or Wage

Yr. 15&8 Starting Ending /0d

Rea n for leaving Z ~ e m em-

I

Job Title and Duties I Reason for leaving

1 Starting Ending

I *ALL employment Information above must be completed in full for your application to be considered.

City State Zip

In the past seven years have you ever been discharged, suspended or asked to resign by an employer? YES NOD If yes, give employer name, date of action, and reason

Supervisor's Name


Have you ever worked for us? YES NOW If yes, and not included above, give dates employed, position. any other name used and reason for leaving-

May we contact your present employer at this time for a reference? YES@NO@

For the purpose of verifying information on this application, have you ever worked or attended school under a different name at any of the organizations you have listed? Y E S O NOW If yes, specify name

PLEASE READ THESE STATEMENTS OVER CAREFULLY AND INITIAL EACH PARAGRAPH BEFORE SIGNING AT THE BOTTOM nave dlscosed all infarnht :- r-a- s 'eevant and should be consldered applicable to my candidacy for employment. 4 C lnltials

List two professional references familiar with your work ability (exclude relatives)

-AS.- - -. ;.tand, where permissible under applccable state and local law, I may be subject to apre-employment drug test after .... =.- . - 3 a conditional offer of empioyment. and must receive a negative result before being permitted to commence .,. r -- ;. :'I Weis Markets. SJ {nitiais

me (not related to you)

Address ate ZIP

17~3 -&d- f t k C ' * & Phone

How acquainted and far haw ,ng?

x-4L-3

I <--?-tand, where permissible under applicable state and local law, I may be subject to a pre-employment medical ex-- lation after receiving a conditional offer of employment, and must meet the qualifications for the position, 6.::- ;r without reasonable accommodation, before being permitted to commence work with Weis Markets. S 4 C_ initials

! -ereby certify that the information given by me is true in all respects. I authorize Weis Markets and its representatives 10 contact my prior employers and all others 'or the purpose of verification of the Information I have supplied and release same from any liability resulting 'ram !he rfsr-natlon reieased. I authorize employers, schools and other persons named an this appilcat~on to prcvde any lnformation or transcripts requested. b J lnitials

Full Name (not related to you) - 1- 6Lertti

~(idlehb street tafe ZIP

I Z S I ~ , ~ A w . I ST. P I ? Y * ~

I expressly understand and agree that, if employed, my employment, having no specified term, is based upon mutual consent and may be terminated at will, with or without cause, by either party (the employer or me) without prior notice to the other, unless otherwrse prohibited by law. SJ C- Initials

Phone

3$3-01 b o

I understand that no representation, whether oral or written, by any representative or agent of Weis Markets, at any time, can constitute an implied or expressed contract of empioyment. I further understand no representative or agent of Weis Markets, has the authority to enter into an agreement for employment for any specified period of time or to make any change in any policy, procedure, benefit or other terms or condition of employment other than in a document signed by the Dlrector of Human Resources or hislher authorized representative. Inithis

Occupation i z c ~ . At41

r------------------------------------------------------------------.

I FOR MARYLAND APPLICANTS ONLY: I I

1 Maryland lie detector law - "Under Maryland law, an employer may not require or demand, as a condition of employment, prospective I I employment, or continued employment, that an individual submit to or take a lie detector or similar test. Any employer who violates this pro- I I vision is guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine not exceeding S100." I

I

I Acknowledgment of Maryland Lie Detector Law: Date I Maryland allplioants signature required

i I

I certify, under penalty Of Perjury, that all of the above information is true and complete, and I understand that any falsification or omission of information may result in denial of employment or, if hired, may result in termination regardless of the time lapse before discovery. S J c lnltials

Note: An offer of employment is conditioned upon complying with Weis Markets' requirements including, but not limited to signing a Consent to Conduct an Investigation.

MY SIGNATURE IS EVIDEN TH THE ABOVE STATEMENTS ;'-, Appltcant's signature


COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY

MARK M. DALTON DMctEavrt Administrator

THOMAS N. WEAVER; ESQUIRE Depuiy Dlstrlct Court bdrninlntrator

FAY E. BINZEN Assistah4 Distrld Court Adminfstratw - Civil

RUSSELL A. GLASS Assistant Dlstrlct Court Mminist@~r - Criminal

ELIZABETH A. GLITHRIDGE Asslslsnt Dlstrict Court Adrninllrator - Humsn R#soure~scaYP~rchastng

BEVERLY A. KIRBY Assislanl DisMct C~urt Admlnlstiator - Judicial lnformatioo Systems

OFFICE OF DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATION

Fourth Floor, New Courthouse 50 North Duke Street, PO Box 83480

Lancaster, PA 17608-3480 Phonc 71 7-299-8041

Fax: 717-295-3599 www.co.lancaster.pa.lrslcou~s

PREfAlAL SERVICES AND BAIL ADMINISTRATION DANIEL D. SCARBERRY

Bail Administrator Second Floor, Old Courthouse

Phone: 71 7-295-3584 Fax: 71 7-295-3625

Stan Caterbone 1250 Fremont Street kincaster, Pennsylvania 17603

Dear Mr. Caterbone:

Enclosed please &d your Application to the Court of Common Pleas for the Appointment as Republican County Commissioner and your resume which you hand delivered to the Court Adminishation Office on Tuesday, January 23,2007. 1 am retunkg these documents to you because as required by the aunou11cement of position vacaucy (www.co.lancsteraaus/wurts) you must also include a statement of your goals and objectives and a signed criminal background investigation waiver. All these documents must be delivered in one package and must include twelve (12) copies. I also note that you checked the box indicating that you were not a member of the Republican party which is a requirement to be considered for the forthcoming Commissioner vacancy.

Mark M. Dalton District Court Administrator


COUNTY OF LANCASTER APPLICATION TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR APPOINTMENT AS REPUBLICAN

COUNTY COMMISSIONER NAME Caterbone Stan DATE 01/23/2007

LLST -RST M <

PRESENTADDRESS 1250 F r e m o n t S t ree t L a n c a s t e r PA 17603 9,REC. C8," S,*,G X \ P C O D C

SALARY: $83,439 DATE YOU CAN START 0211412007

HAVE YOU BEEN PREVIOUSLY EMPLOYED BY THECOUNN?U NO. IF YES LIST: DEPARTMENT DATTCMPLOYTD

LIST PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS. LICENSES. APPRENTICESHIPS, SPECIALIZED TRAINING, OR FOREIGN LANGUAGE SKILLS:

Life Insurace, NASD series 7.22 ~ ~ - - p ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~

EDUCATION

HIGH SCHOOL

COLLEGE UNDERGRADUATE

..... GRADUATE

OTHER POST HIGH SCHOOL

REFERENCES: GIVE THE NAMES OF 3 PERSOW NOT RELATEDTO YOU. WHOM IOU HAVE KNOWN AT LEASTONE YEAR

II I I I I II

NAME AND LOCATION OFSCHOOL

Lancaster Catholic H i g h School

Millersville University

11 R o b e r t Kauffman 1 1755 Oregon Pike, Lancaster, PA 17601 1 I Primier F inanc ia l I Former Partner. 11

NAME

D a l e H i g h

John Garafolo

II THECOUNNISAN EQUALOPPORTUNITYEMPLOYERANDDOESNOTUNLAWFULLY DISCRIMINATE IN EMPLOYMENT. NO QUESTION ON THIS APPLICATION IS USED F O R M E PURPOSE OF LIMITING OR EXCLUDING ANY APPLICANT FROM CONSIDERATION FOR EMPLOYMENT ON A 11

YEARS

COMPLETED

3

4

BASIS PROHIBITED BY LOCAL. STATE. OR FEDERAL LAW. EQUAL ACCESS TO EMPLOYMENT SERVICES AND PROGRAMS ARE AVAILABLE 11 TO ALLPERSONS. APPLICANTS REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATlONTOTHEAPPLlCATlON AND/OR INTERVIEW PROCESSSHOULD 11

ADDRESS

High Industries, Greenfield Park, Lancaster. PA

Gaithersburg. MD

11 CONTACT THE COURT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE. 11

DIPLOMWDEGREE

College Prep

Bachelor of Schience Business Admin i s t r a t i on

Paae 1 of 2

COURSE OF STUDY

Computer S c i e n c e and Business Admin i s t r a t i on

PHONE NO. BUSINESS

High Indust r ies . - - National Institute

RELATIONSHIP

Former Jo in t . . - Former Proiect


Caterbone 0112312007

EMPLOYMENT EXPERIENCE - Inc lude any j o b r e l a t e d mi l i tary service assignments a n d volunteer activities.

Advanced Media Group

I All Inclusive

I I

PHONE NO. SUPERVISOR NAME RE&SON FOR LEAVING

I EMPLOYER NAME/ADDRESS

Pflumm Contractors, Inc.

REASON FOR LEAVING

Forced to Resign PHONE NO.

717-872-72 I

EMPLOYER N&ME/ADDRESS

Financial Management Group, Ltd.

JOB TITLL: Controller

108 DUTIES:

Management Consultant, MIS, Controller

STARTING MOIYR

0111994

SUPERVISOR

Mr. David Pflumm

ENDINGMOIYR

0111998

PHONE NO.

I I CONVICTED OF, PLEAD G U l L N TO OR RECEIVED DEFERRED ADJUDICATION FOR A MISDEMEANOR OR A OVES I F YES, PLEASE EXPIAIN

108 TITLE: Executive Vice P r e s i d e n t , President of

JOB DUTIES:

STARTING MOIYR

0111986

SUPERVISOR

-5-F

JOB DUTIES:

d 2) ARE YOU A REGISTERED ELECTOR OF LANCASTER COUNN? YES NO

3) CAN YOU PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF ELlGlBlLlrYTO WORK I N THE UNITED

5 ) ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? 0 YES

4) MAY WE CONTACTYOUR PRESENT EMPLOYER PRIOR TO

ENDiNG MOIYR

1111988

Founder, Management, Secretary FMG, President FMG Advisory. Joint Ventures, Commercial Mortgage Banking. Financial Planner

JOB TITLE: EMPLOYER NAME/ADDRESS

REASON FOR LFAYINC

In Current Federal Litigation

REASON FOR LEAVING PHONE NO.

I HEREBY GIVE THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER AND THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS THE RIGHTTO MAKE A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION

INTO MY PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION AND REFERENCES. I RELEASE FROM LlABlLlN ALL PERSONS, COMPANIES, AND

CORPORATIONS SUPPLYING SUCH INFORMATION AND INDEMNIN AND HOLD HARMLESS THE COUNN OF LANCLSTER AND THE

COURTOF COMMON PLEAS FROM ANY LIABILITY WHICH MIGHT RESULT FROM SUCH AN INVESTiGATlON.

STARTING MOIYR

SUPTRYISOR

I UNDERSTAND THAT ANY FALSE ANSWERS, STATEMENTS OR REPRESENTATIONS MADE BY ME IN THlS APPLICATION AND ANY AND

ALL ACCOMPANYING PAPERWORK SHALL CONSTITUTE SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR REMOVAL FROM OFFICE AND/OR PENALTIES UNDER

ENDING MD/YR

18 PA CONS.STAT., SECTION 4904 RELATED TO THE UNSWORN FALSIFICATION TO AUTHORITIES. I UNDERSTAND THAT NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION ORTHE GRANTING OF AN INTERVIEW IS INTENDED TO CREATE AN OFFER OF

APPOINTMENTTOTHE APPLIED FOR POSITION.


Application to the Court of Common Pleas for appointment as Republican County Commissioner Instructions

Use this application to apply for county commissioner for the County of Lancaster

To begin, click mouse in 'Last Name' box and begin typing. Use tab to move to next box, use shiftltab to movc to previous box Left click mouse or press Entcr to chcck or uncheck box. All 4 digits of a year must be shown in a date.

Please he aware that you will not be ab!e to save the completed application as a computerized file.

When you finish cntcring data, be sure to read the information directly above the signature line. Please understand that by signing the form you state that the infoni~ation IS correct; authorize the County of Lancaster and the Court of Comrnon Pleas to investigate your employment and educational background; and understand that the application does not create an employment contract between you and the County of Lancaster.

Plcasc sign and date the application and send both pages and any accompanying paperwork to:

Court of Common Pleas Mark Dalton, District Court Administrator 50 North Duke Street P.O. Box 83480 Lancaster, PA 17608-3480


Kunzler & Co. Inc. 640-662 Manor Street

P.O. Box 4747 Lancaster, PA 17604

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

we ere an Egust oppnunity Employer. It is our miicy to abide by slt Federal. State, and iosai laws concerning dissrimination in empioymenl D~~~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ N~ question in this appiication is intended to elicit information in vioiation of any rucn law nor will any information obtained in response to any questson be used in violation of any svch law. I- 22-d 7

9 - - Last Name F8nl

Street Addless

1 J&G&#NT S W ~ M CltY nstate ZIP I

Db03 I

1 List any rqlatives or friands working for thrs organlzatlon

Sm8a1 ~CUIIIY NO

a00 -%-om ~ o m e Phone

( ) P J ~ A now tong a! ~ r e s e l nodress?

Position Appiying For (If rpplisant responds "ANV, appiisrlion will NOT be considered further)

I

I 1 In case of accident notify 1 Phone

Wages Elpested

were you previously employed by this organization? Yes, Date@) &

Department

I -- ~

Mechanical and/or Technical Experience (Describe any and all qualifications):

Name Relationsnip

Name and Locat ion of School

Have you been convicted of a crime in the past 10 years, excluding misdemeanors and summary offenses, which has not been annulled, expunged, or sealed by a court? (A conviction record will not necessarily be a bar to employment.)

Yes

GRADUATE I SCHOOL I

If "yes," please describe in full detail: I

Yes No

Can you verify your legal rights to work in the U.S. by providing a birth certificate, proof of U.S. Citizenship, or by some other means? Yes

n NO o--+: -.,- A -- c,*b..- c.:..,..

HOW Long? Have you served an apprenticeship?

Yes

Type or Trade

Where did you serve? When did YOU serve?


I FORM 2700

EXPERIENCE - Lis t Present and Former Employers for last 10 years beg inn l n t w i t h most recent .

NAME AND ADDRESS OF COMPANY

Aa,,wwfiMk 66 2-24 se- Lk.c&i

L-b

LAST WAGES

SUPERVISOR

ni? 6-

May we contact the above employers? d e s 0 No If "No," indicate which one@) you do not wish us to contact.

Additional Remarks:

APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION - Please read carefu l ly before signing.

I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the answers given by me to the foregoing questions and the statements made by me in this application are correct and complete. I understand that misrepresentation or omission of facts in this application may result in my discharge.

If employed, i understan gree that such employment may be terminated at any time, without prior notice, and that my employment will not be governed by any exp or i m p l i m t r a c t by(Js aywill.

Applicontls Sipn~ture M U m 1 Date I / -aa -u? / DO #of WRITE BELOW - FOR COMPANY USE ONLY

I Interview? Yes No Date Hour

Resul ts o f Interview:

Acceptable fo r Employment? Yes N o Star t ing Rate Star t ing Da te Shift

, 3 4 i E

STAPTE? / LEF~ DESCRIBE YOUR WORK

--iL-W+ 11-4 hhwfiww L b .

I - $7& ib ,tutkr

lntewlewed By Date

REASON FOR LEAVING

jcl LICI(.AT~W

14 L- C I J W

Approved By Date


Select Security Please Print Clearly

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Date of Application: /o - c- 2m&

This company is an equal oppomnity employer and will not discriminate in the hiring process on the basis of sex, religion, race, color, a; ancestry or handicap.

PERSONAL INFORMATION

EMPLOYMENT INTEREST

&SF?-)

ry Desired: /

Social Security No. 2m -%-oW7 Home Phone

(749 431 -8/&f Business Phone (7/3 f31-@'8$

. Date you can start? Can you work overtime if necessary? Yes No

Work Status Desired Full Time Part Time If Pan Time, Number of Hours Temporary

I

Are you available to work: Overtime- Weekends- Shifts - " *.

EDUCATION AND TRAINING +


-

Other special training or skills (languages, machine operation, licenses, etc.)

6 ,?56---,@6

EMPLOYMENT HISTORY (list below last three employers, starting with last one first)

-5GF & & * c L ~ Company Name

Address &Telephone

State Job Title and Describe Your Work

Company Name

Employed (state Month and Year) From To

Pay or Salary

Reason for Leaving

Employed (state Month and Year) From To

I Address &Telephone

State Job Title and Describe Your'Work

MILITARY SERVICE RECORD f i

Pay or Salary

Reason for Leaving

Company Name

- - - Address & Telephone

State Job Title and Describe Your Work

Have you served in the U.S. Armed Forces? yes (i+j

Employed (state Month and Year) From To -

J

Pay or Salary

Reason for Leaving

Date of Entry Branch of Service

Date of Discharge Final Rank

Indicate service school attended or special training received Advanced Media Group of 194 08/22/2007

DRIVING HISTORY . '

(Answer ONLY if you arc applying for aDriving-related position)

Do you currently have a valid driver's license? Yes No If yes, in what State/Counrry: Driver LicensenD Number:

Have you had your driver's license suspended or revoked in the past (3) years? Yes No If yes, explain:

Do you currently have any restrictions on your driver's license? If yes, explain:

GENERAL

Have you ever applied for employnent with this company before? Yes

Have you been employed by Select Security in the past? Yes @ lfyes, when

Are you authorizcd to work in the United States? Indicate how you are authorized: fl US Citiz :&anent Resident Other

Are you I8 years of age or older?

Have you been convicted of a crime (which has not been annulled or sealed by a court) during the past 7 involving theft, 6aud or other dishonesty, rape, murder, assault or other violence, or the sale or possession of illegal drugs? Yes &

If yes, please provide details:

A conviction record will not necessarily be a barrier to employment at Select Security. All factors, including thc nature of the inkaction, the date of conviction, the rehabilitation and the job for which you arc applying will be considcred. If yes, provide details:

--

REFERENCES Telephone Years Known Occupation

7 ...

/ * - a

AUTHORIZATION (PLEASE M A D CAREFULLY BEFORE SIGNING)

"1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF hlY KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTAND THAT, IF EMPLOYED, FALSIFIED STATEMENTS ON THIS APPLICATION SIIALL BE GROUNDS FOR DISMISSAL.

I AUTHORIzF ISVFSTIGATION OF ALL STATEbIEKTS COVTAINED IIFREIN AND THE REFERENCES AND F\IPI.OYERS LISTED ABOVE TO GIVE YOU ANY AND ALL INFORI\IATION COSCERYING h N PKEVlOUS E\lPLOYJIENT AKD ANY PEKTIXEKT LKFORhlATlOPl THEY hlAY I IAm, PERSONAL OR OTHERWISE. AND RELEASE THE COhIPANY FROM ALL LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGE THAT RlAY RESULT FROM UT~IZATION OF SUCH INFORMATION.

1 ALSO UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT NO REPRESENTATIVE OF THE COMPANY HAS ANY AUTHORlTY TO ENTER ISTO ANY AtiKEE.\lEKT FOR E>lPLOYhlENT FOR ANY SPECIFILD PERIOD OFTI>IE ORTO hlAKE AKY ,~-\CREE~IEN'I CO3 IKARY TO THE FOREGOING, I:NLESS IT IS IX WRITISC ASD SIGNED BY AN AWHOKIZED COfilPANY REPRESENTATIVE.


1 UNDERSTAND THAT, AS A CONDITION OF EMPLOYMENT, I MUST BE AUTHORIZED TO WORK IN THE UNITED STATES AND DEMONSTRATE THAT AUTHORIZATION AS REQUIRED BY THE IMMIGRATION REFORM & CONTROL ACT OF 1986.

I UNDERSTAND THAT IF I AM EXTENDED AN OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT WITH SELECT SECURITY, IT WILL BE COSTINCEST UPOS nly SUCCESSFL.L COMPLETION OF A POST-OFFER PINSICAI. EXAMINATION. I CONSENT TO HEI.EA3E O t ALL 3lY >IEDICAI, IYFORh1ATION AS >MY BE NEEDED TO DETER31INF. hlY C,\YARII.ITY TO PERFOR\l THE WORK \\'HIGH I kUVE UEES OFFERED. I USDERSTAND THE POST-OFFER PHYSICAL EXAM WILL -

lNCLUDE DRUG AND ALCOHOL SCREENING.

I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS APPLICATION OR SUBSEQUENT EMPLOYMENT IS "AT WILL" AND CAN BE TERMINATED BY EITHER ME OR SELECT SECURITY AT ANY TIME FOR ANY OR NO REASON.

I K4VE READ, UNDERSTAND, AND BY MY SIGNATURE A

ate /O ere &< Signature


Turkey Hill Minit Markets, an Equal Opportunity Employer, does not discriminate in hiring or terms a r d conditions of employment because of an individual's race, religion, color, sex, age, ancestry, n;i:oibi?i origin, marital status o r disability. Please answer al l questions as completely as possible.YOUR APPLICATION WILL BE CONSIDERED ACTIVE FOR SIXTY (60) DAYS. FOR CONSIDERATION AFTER THATYOU MUST REAPPLY.

Full Name Last Firs

?-25?2@ 6 Present Address 220 d w b Qd$FG4

No 8 Street Ctty State ZIP ~ - 2 s - L 6

,

43- If this phone is not your phone, in whose Phone No. (Day) 1?/{3/- f/gy Phone No. (Night) -ChVI name IS it listed?

social security NO' ''-3~2 f~ cqc? Do you have a valid Penna drivers license? ( )Yes ( W o

If not at least 18 years of age, list date of birth

If under 18, can you submit a work permit? ( )Yes ( ) No

Posltlon desired Date you can start 4 ~ a - How many hours per week do you want to work? -

Turkey Hill Minit Markets tries t o grant employees' requests regarding availability for work; however, due t o the nature of our business, employees will be required to work at night, on weekends, and holidays, sometimes with short notice and may be requested to work overtime.

Will you work Full time? Hours availabie 2% Will you work Saturday? Holidays? 3 or 4 hour shifts? f

/ Are you available to work

/

Have you ever worked for Turkey Hill Minit Markets? ( )Yes ( L)+%- When? Where? - .. Position?

Do you have friendsirelatives working for Turkey Hill Minit Markets? ( q ~ e s ( ) No Where? ) ) A d E aok [krdlm After reading the Physical Capabi tes Analysis of the job for which you are applying, do you believe that you can the essentla functions of that job with or wthout a reasonable accommodation? (Applicants will not necessarily be dsqualified if they are upable to perform a particuiar job duty.) f - r t e s I ) No If the answer is No. please list (from the descrption) which duty (duties) you are unabie to perform:

Do you liave transportation? ( Y ~ e s ( ) No If No, please explain

May we contact your present employer for a reference? ( )Yes ( ) No

Have you been convicted of a criminal offense (except minor traffic offenses)? Convictioli is not necesszrily a bar to employment. fisweve:. dece@& as to ther existence or falsificaton of their exact nature will result in denial of employment. ! ! Ye$ &yo If yes. please explain

EDUCATION Type af Graduated or GED?

Cjqe Degrees Elementary

C o i i e g e ~ P

What further training or special courses have you had since leavng schooi? .

Will you be continuing your education during your employment with Turkey Hill? ( )Yes ( ) No

Please check below w t skills you have and indicate: Where 2Retail (Saies)

Grocery Store Background Cash Register Operation ?7ZJ'- /% 2 l, Calculator Bookkeeping

T y p i n g WPM Other Office Machines (please explain)


DISCLOSURE AND RELEASE In connection with my application for employment with Turkey Hill

Minit Markets, I understand that consumer reports which may contain public record information may be requested. These reports may include the following types of information: names and dates of employment, reason for termination of employment, acc~dents, work experience, etc. I further understand that such reports may contain public record information concerning my driving record, credit, bankruptcy proceedings, criminal records, etc., from federal, state and other agencies which maintain such records.

You have the right, upon written request, to receive a written description of the nature and scope of the investigation requested and a written summary of your rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

I authorize, without reservation, any person or entity contacted by Turkey Hill Minit Markets or its agent or agents to furnish the above- stated information, and I release any such person or entity from any liability for furnishing such information.

Print Name 7-,2&,20) 6

Applicant's Signature -


SERVICE IN U.S. AF$jED FORCES

Have you served 111 U S Armed Forces? ( )Yes (&ld What branch of the servlce?

Spec~al tra~nlng rece~ved Member of Reserve or Guards( )Yes ( ) No

PERSONAL REFERENCES

WORK EXPERIENCE

Give the names of 3 persons not related to you whom you have known at least 1 year. Do not include previous employers.

I Name

i /+V/~O&LOW' 2 fi/e /JPLo& k? 3 prL4-J

Street Address 8 Town 1 Phone Number / ~ c c . ~ a : 2- 8 h6-e c' E , ~ - ~ s $ I k a n Acn-a~ted - 2'8 - yC2 9 fl.f.2 h .

/S'LUE /be ,4340

List all positions, starting with your present or most recent job, including all periods of unemployment and reasons.

1

1 Have you ever been asked to resign a job or been terminated? ( ) Yes (& if yes, please explain

3

F-

Indicate by number which of the above jobs you liked m o s t . Which of the above jobs did you like l e a s t .

If you used another name during your employment, state the name you used and indicate the company by number

2

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY -APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION AND AGREEMENT I certify that the information I have provided to the foregoing questions is true and correct and no attempt has been made to conceal pertinent lnformation. I

authorize my former employers, schools and personal references to provide any information they may have regarding me. I voluntarily give Turkey Hill Minit Markets the right to investigate all statements contained in the application. If any information given by me in this application is found to be false or misleading, I will be subject to dismissal at any time during the period of my employment, and I agree to hold this company blameless in that event.

In consideration for my employment by your company. I agree to Conform to the rules and regulations of the company and acknowledge that these rules and regulations may be changed, interpreted, suspended, withdrawn, or added to by your company at any time, at the company's sole option and without any prior notice to me.

I further acknowledge that my employment may be terminated, and any offer of employment, if such is made, or my acceptance of an employment offer, if such is to occur, may be withdrawn, w~th or without cause, and with or without prior notice, at any time, at the option of the company or myself. I understand that no representative of the company other than the President, and then only in writing signed by him and me, has any authority to enter into any agreement for employment for any spec~fied period of time or to assure any benefits or terms and conditions of employment, or make any agreement contrary to the foregoing. I understand that I cannot rely on contrary oral statements.

AS a condition of mv emDlovment with Turkev Hill. I aaree that all information which I receive in the course of mv emolovment relatina in anv manner to the

Starting

Employer

Street Address

City, State. Zip

~ ~ . . . r .,s ness ac: t ' es, r..stomers. i narcla alfa rs, orograms. corcepts or desigrs of T ~ r ~ e y n are :o oe treated as traoe secrets a10 Kept r con1 aence not to oe a sr 3%: :q arty "I autrortzed person etner n,r ng or aher my emplo)~rent. ur .set b) me r ary mainer aa.%Se to h e n1eres:s of T:wy h

t .-zt.sta.lu t r l d I..>:! rng co.#td rlru i?l 118 s clr ~ l ~ y l l ei 1 +PI c j t 0.1 or 11 tne grant r 3 of an i7tenlerr 5 l l t en i e l to Czeate a1 ernpc)nie '1 n)nlldit Uelneen

- Employer

Srreet Address

City, State. Zip

- , , - r i e l ".I! and myself for either employment or for providing of any benefit. I acknowledge that a?y offer of employment to me by Turkey M i Minit Markets is contingent upon my timely completion of INS Form 1-9 and producing the

proper documents requlred by the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. My failure to se requirements within the specified time will result in the termnaton of employment.

I acknowledge that I

/

Ending

Name and m e of immed,a:e Superwscr

Date Hired

Date Separated

Phone

Date Hired

Date Separated

Phone

fhank You For Your Interest id Turkey ~ i l f Minit Markets

Starting

Ending

Name and Title of Immedicte Supervisor


Smith Barney 150 North Queen Street Lancaster, PA 17602

Dropped resume off and talked to Office Manager and Abe Diffenbach, Senior Broker and Manager.


Ocotober 24, 2006

Stan Caterbone 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 1,7516

Dear Mr Caterbone:

The City of Lancaster has received your Municipal Building resume/appl icat ion.

You will be notified if the City has any further interest in your experience and skills. If you are not notified, your resume/application will be placed in our active file and will remain active for a period of two years. Please provide us with any changes of address and/or phone number in order for us to up-date your resurne/application.

The City is pleased that you thought enough of our organization to want to be part of our team.

Sincerelv,

Chief of Human Resources

PO Box 1599 120 N. Duke Street. Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17608-1599 717-291-4711 TDD 717-291-4761 FAX 717-291-4713


[email protected] Printed: Monday, January 29, 2007 9:09 AM

From : Stan Caterbone <[email protected]>

Sent : Saturday, October 14, 2006 1:25 PM

To : [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Subject : Media-jInfoTech-Financial Consultant

Attachment :

ResumeOctober52006.pdf (0.25 MB)

For your considerations for hourly or project consulting. Thank you in advance. Advanced Media Group Stan Caterbone mailto: [email protected] www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com Fax: (717) 427-1621 Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516


45 Erick Road, Lancaster, PA 17601 (717) 397-4246

Application for Employment RED ROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY

An Equal Opportunity Employer

PERSONAL INFORMATION

Name Stan J. Caterbone Social Security Number:

Mailing Address 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA 17603 Address

Telephone Number None

City State Zip . Are you a United States Citizen? Yes X No

EMPLOYMENT DESIRED

Position Bus Driver Date you can start Immediately

Fulltime XXX -Part-Time Salary Desired

May we inquire of your present employer?

EDUCATION

Name/Address of School Course Did you

Years Attended* Graduate?*

High School Lancaster Catholic High Julliette Avenue, Lancaster, PA 17603

College Prep 3 1976

College Millersville University Business Admin Computer Science

4 1980

Other

*The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 prohibits discrimination on the basis of age with respect to individuals who are at least 40 but less than 70 years of age.

MILITARY SERVICE

U.S. Military or Naval Service.

Membership in National Guard or Reserve .

GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS

Rank

Rank

Bus Operator/Mechanic Applicants: Driver License No. State

Do you currently have a commercial drivers license? Yes Q No Q

Class ____________________________________________ Endorsements

Have you had any motor vehicle accidents, moving violations, license suspensions or other violations of the Motor Vehicle Code within the last ten years? Yes Q No Q

If yes, list details of violations and/or accidents

RRTA

Date:


GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (Continued)

Office Applicants: Please indicate which of the following office equipment you can operate.

Typewriter Q WPM _____ Calculator Q Dictaphone Equipment Q Shorthand/Speedwriting Q WPM

Computer Q Please list all software used

Other (please specify)

All Applicants:

Have you had any felony or misdemeanor convictions in the last three years? No

If yes, please list where, when and type of violation

No

EMPLOYMENT RECORD

List employers starting with the most recent. Federal regulations require information on all driving jobs held for the past 10 years including dates of employment and reason for leaving each employer. Date Month/Year Name/Address/Phone of Employer Salary Position Reason for Leaving

From 1998 Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA 17516

None CEO/Owner

To Present From 1994 Pflumm Contractors,

54 S. Duke St, Millersville,PA 1755140K Controller Hostile Termination Retaliation

For Federal Civil ActionsTo 1998

From

To

From

To

Attach a separate sheet if necessary.

REFERENCES

Name Address/Phone Occupation Years Known Robert Kauffman 1755 Oregon Pike, Lancaster, PA 17601 Financial Planner 25 Michael Caterbone 122 Swan Avenue, Plantation, FL 33324 AIM Wholesaler 45 Mal Brubaker 835 High Street, Lancaster, PA 17603 Construction Estimator 14 REMARKS

I authorize investigation of all statements in this application. I understand that misrepresentation or omission of facts called for is cause for dismissal. Further, I understand and agree that my employment is for no definite period and may, regardless of the date of payment of my wages and salary, be terminated at any time without previous notice. Date. Signature.


DL-503 (6-06) REQUEST FOR

DRIVER INFORMATION DO NOT SEND CASH

PRINT OR TYPE ALL INFORMATION LEGIBLY SEE REVERSE FOR INSTRUCTIONS / INFORMATION

CHECK (/) ONE ONLY: D BASIC INFORMATION: $5.00 FEE (Driver history is not included) [] 3 YEAR DRIVER RECORD: S5.00 FEE [jj 10 YEAR DRIVER RECORD:

$5.00 FEE (Employment Purposes Only)

D CERTIFIED DRIVER RECORD: $10.00 FEE Q COPY OF DOCUMENT FROM FILE (MICROFILM): $5.00 FEE

Q CERTIFIED COPY OF DOCUMENT FROM FILE: $10.00 FEE

A REQUESTER INFORMATION B END USER OF INFORMATION BEING REQUESTED Red Rose Transit Authority NAME/COMPANY

ADDRESS P.O. Box number may be used in addition to the actual address, but cannot be used as the only address. 45 Erick Road

ADDRESS (PO Box not acceptsole), need to provide physics! location of business/residence

3ITY Lancaster

STATE ZIP CODE PA 17601

CITY STATE ZIP CODE

PHONE NUMBER (REQUIRED) (717) 397-5613 Safety & Training Mgr. DAYTIME TELEPHONE NUMBER DAYTIME TELEPHONE

NUMBER D AFFIDAVIT OF INTENDED USE

S1GNATURE

Lisa M. Marion

NOTARIZATION NOT REQUIRED WHEN REQUESTING YOUR OWN RECORD

C DRIVER INFORMATION NAME: LAST

Caterbone FIRST Stan

INITIAL J.

ADDRESS 1250 Fremont Street CITY Lancaster STATE PA

ZIP CODE 17603

intended Use of the Information Requested: CHECK ONLY ONE B = Driver Release (Driver has given written authorization to obtain his/her record.) ' C = Credit (In connection with a credit transaction involving the driver.) E = Employment (To support the hiring or the continuation of employment. Employer must have driver's signed release on file.) R = Insurance Company requesting record of person it intends to insure, now insures, or has rejected for insurance. K = Court Order must be attached. (A subpoena issued in compliance with Pa. R.C.P. 4009.21 will be accepted in lieu of a court order). L = Attorney representing driver identified in Section C (Driver has given written authorization to obtain his/her record.)

PHONE NUMBER I hereby Certify that Li S3 M. Marion PRINTED NAME OF REQUESTER

DRIVER NUMBER 18195782

DATE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR

July 15 1958 200-46-0959

Will use the driver record abstract(s) required pursuant to Section 6114 of the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code, for the purpose checked above only and no other reason. This affidavit is filed in compliance with Section 607 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. I/We have read and signed this form after its completion, and I/We swear or affirm that the statements made herein are true and correct, and that

E DRIVER RELEASE statement made on or pursuant to this form is subject to the penalties of 18 PA C.S. Section 4903(a)(2) (relating to false

hereby request

NAME OF DRIVER the Department of Transportation to furnish a copy of my PA Drivers Record to

shall include punishment of a fine not exceeding $5,000, or to a term of imprisonment of not more than two years, or both.

X NAME OF PERSON/COMPANY SIGNATURE OF REQUESTER

Safety and Training Manager Title

SIGNATURE OF DRIVER DATE F MICROFILM ; • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN

TO BEFORE ME: MONTH DAY YEAR 2 X

TYPE OF DOCUMENT DATE OF VIOLATION

SIGNATURE OF PERSON ADMINISTERING OATH

(see list of available documents below)

You may obtain a copy of your own 3 Year and/or 10 Year Driving Record on PennDOT'S website at www.dmv.state.pa.us


Documents Available: • Citations • Suspension Credit Affidavits •Court Certifications -Suspension/Revocation Letters •Applications -Restoration Letters • License Renewals • Rescind Letters • Judgments • Department Hearing or Exam Notice

SIGN IN PRESENCE OF NOTARY

MESSENGER NO.


RED ROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY "Release of Information Form - 49 CFR Part 40 Drug and Alcohol Testing"

Section 1: To be completed by new employer, signed by the employee, and transmitted to the . previous employer: Employee Printed or Typed Name: ______________________________________ Employee-SS or ID number: __________________________________________

/ hereby authorize release of information from my Department of Transportation regulated drug and alcohol testing records by my previous employer, listed in Section I-B, to the employer listed in Section I-A. This release is in accordance with the DOT Regulation 49 CFR Part 40, Section 40.25. I understand that information to be released in Section II-A by my previous employer, is limited to the following DOT-regulated testing items: 1. Alcohol tests with a result of 0.04 or higher; 2. Verified positive drug tests; 3. Refusals to be tested; 4. Other violations of DOT agency drug and alcohol testing regulations; 5. Information obtained from previous employers of a drug and alcohol rule violation; 6. Documentation, if any, of completion of the return-to-duty process following a rule violation.

Employee Signature:___________________________________________________ Date: ___________ I-A. New Employer Name: Red Rose Transit Authority ______________ Address: ____________ 45 Erick Road ____________________________

____________ Lancaster, PA 17601 ____________________ Phone #: (717) 397-5613 Fax#: (7171 397-4761 ________ Designated Employer Representative: Lisa M. Marion ________________ I-B. Previous Employer Name: _____________________________________________ Address: ___________________________________________________________

Phone #: ~~ Fax #: Designated Employer Representative (in known):____________________________

Section: To be completed by the previous employer and transmitted by mail or fax to the new employer: U-A. In the two years prior to the date of the employee's signature (in Section I), for DOT-regulated testing— 1. Did employee have alcohol tests with a result of 0.04 or higher? YES _____NO X 2. Did the employee have verified positive drug tests? YES ____NO X 3. Did the employee refuse to be tested? YES ____ NO X 4. Did the employee have other violations of DOT agency drug and alcohol testing regulations? YES ____ NO X 5. Did a previous employer report a drug and alcohol rule violation to you? YES ____ NO X 6. If you answered "yes" to any of the above items, did the employee complete the return-to-duty process? YES ____ NO______ NOTE: If you answered "yes" to item 5, you must provide the previous employer's report. Ifyouansered "yes" to item 6, you must also transmit the appropriate return-to-duty documentation(e.g., SAP report(s), follow-up testins record). II-B Name of person providing information in Section II-A: ____________________________________ Title: ___________________________________ Phone #: Date:


RED ROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY

APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PRE-EMPLOYMENT DRUG TESTING

In accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration's regulations, 49 CFR Part 40, all prospective employees that will be performing safety-sensitive functions, as defined in the regulations, must complete and acknowledge the following information in order to be considered for an available position with RRTA:

PART A

I, Stan J. Caterbone, have not, tested positive for or refused to test, on any (Name of Applicant) (Circle one)

pre-employment drug or alcohol test administered by an employer to which I applied for, but did not obtain, safety-sensitive transportation work covered by DOT agency drug and alcohol testing rules during the last two years.

PARTB

I understand that as part my application for employment I must successfully complete a pre-employment drug test. I understand that a negative test result is required before I will be considered for hire.

May 29, 2007

Signature of Applicant Date

*PLEASE COMPLETE THE ATTACHED RELEASE OF INFORMATION FORM ON REVERSE SIDE FOR EACH EMPLOYER WITHIN THE PRIOR TWO YEARS.


Jersey Mike's Subs - Franchise Information - Franchise Application Form http://www.jerseymikes.com/franchise/apply.html

1 of 1 9/8/2005 11:58 AM

Most Frequently Asked Questionsregarding Jersey Mike's

As of: MM/DD/YY

# of Units Liquid Assets/Net Worth Franchise Fee

1 Unit $75,000/$175,000 $18,500

Complete the form for: (1) each proprietor, or (2) each limited partner who owns 10% or more interest and each general partner, or (3) each stockholder voting stock and each corporate officer and director, or (4) any other person or entity providing a guaranty on the loan.

Name (full legal)

Date of Birth: MM/DD/YY

Residence Address

City, State & Zip Code

Business Phone:

Residence Phone:

E-mail Address:

Marital Status: nmlkj Married nmlkji Single

Spouse Name:

Spouse's Date of Birth: MM/DD/YY

How long at this residence? Years

Previous address if less than 5 years

Current Employer

Position:

Date of Employment: MM/DD/YY To: MM/DD/YY

Address

City, State & Zip Code

1. Are you a partner or officer in any other venture? No 6No

If YES, explain:

2. Have Bankruptcy Proceedings ever been instituted by or against you? Yes 6Yes

If YES, explain:

3. Which two people would attend the 8-10 week training program?

Name: Phone:

09/08/05

Stan Caterbone

07/15/58

220 Stone Hill Road

Conestoga PA 17516

717-799-5915

717-799-5915

[email protected]

Stan Caterbone

10

220 Stone Hill Road


CEO, Owner

02/02/1987 09/08/05

220 Stone Hill Road

Conestoga PA 17516

Chapter 11, US Eastern District Court

Stan Caterbone 717-799-5915


1

Civil Rights Enforcement 15th Floor, Strawberry Square

Harrisburg, PA 17120 (717) 787-0822

Fax: (717) 787-1190

2. IF EMPLOYMENT RELATED, WHOM IN MANAGEMENT HAVE YOU INFORMED OF YOUR COMPLAINT? DAVID PFLUMM; PFLUMM CONTRACTORS, INC., FEBRUARY OF 1998 WHAT ACTION WAS TAKEN? NONE 3. DO YOU KNOW OF ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL (S) WHO HAS BEEN TREATED THE SAME OR RECEIVED SIMILAR TREATMENT? NO WHAT HAPPENED TO THESE INDIVIDUALS? 4. DO YOU HAVE ANY WITNESSES TO VERIFY OR CONFIRM YOUR COMPLAINT? YES 5. DID YOU SUFFER ANY MONETARY LOSS OR LOSS OF BENEFITS? PLEASE EXPLAIN YES VARIOUS BUSINESS INTERESTS –

1. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP,LTD., AND ALL RELATED OPPORTUNITIES 1987 a. FMG ADVISORY,LTD. REGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISOR b. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP,LTD., STOCK AND OPTIONS AND

FRANCHISING OPPORTUNITIES c. MORTGAGE BANKING OPERATIONS d. VENTURE CAPITAL OPPORTUNITIES e. AVIATION CHARTER BUSINESS AND OPPORTUNITIES

2. POWER PRODUCTIONS I – DIGITAL MOVIE JOINT VENTURE WITH a. POWER STATION STUDIOS


2

b. TONY BONJIOVI 1987 c. FLATBUSH FILMS

3. ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD., a. STOCK VALUE b. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES BUSINESS AND OPPORTUNITIES c. JOINT VENTURE OPPORTUNITIES WITH

i. AMERICAN HELIX CORPORATION ii. HIGH INDUSTRIES AND AFFILIATED HIGH COMPANIES iii. AIM INVESTMENTS AND INVESCO iv. EXCELSIOR PLACE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR DOWNTOWN

LANCASTER AND MEEDER GROUP v. DONNELLY GEO SYSTEMS, LANCASTER,PA vi. GAMILLION FILM STUDIOS OF HOLLYWOOD CALIFORNIA

vii. INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS OF HOUSTON TEXAS viii. PLANNERS SECURITIES GROUP, INC. OF ATLANTA, GA

ix. BENNET WILLIAMS REAL ESTATE OF YORK, PA x. BECKY AUSTIN OF HOLLYWOOD, CA; MORTGAGE BANKER xi. MARCY SILEN AND FLATBUSH FILMS OF HOLLYWOOD, CA xii. SKIP LANGLEY AND EESCOMP OF HARRISBURG, PA xiii. NETTWERK MUSIC GROUP BEVERLY HILLS, CA

4. PENNSYLVANIA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BENEFITS –

a. NOVEMBER OF 1987 b. APRIL OF 1998

5. PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING AND FINANCE AGENCY – a. EMERGENCY MORTGAGE FUNDS, NOVEMBER OF 198 b. EMERGENCY MORTGAGE FUNDS , FEBRARY OF 2006

6. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE a. FOOD STAMPS AND CASH ASSITANCE; May 2005 b. FOOD STAMPS AND CASH ASSITANCE; June 2006

7. PROVIDE THE DATE(S) OF INCIDENT(S): QUESTIONS CONTINUED ON PAGES #70

THE FOLLOWING ARE INCIDENTS AND ACCOUNTS TAKEN FROM OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR LEGAL PURPOSES. FOR TIME AND CONVENIENCE DUE TO THE LIGITATION SCHEDULE OF THE COMPLAINTANT, SOME OF THE INCIDENTS MAY NOT BE GERMAIN TO THIS COMPLAINT AND SHOULD BE IGNORED. PLEASE ACCEPT OUR APOLOGIES FOR ANY ERRORS IN EDITING AND FORMATING. ALL COMMUNICATIONS INCLUDING LETTERS, FACSIMILES AND EMAILS ARE IN ITALICS.

July 2, 1987 - In an effort to continue all efforts and business activities, Stan Caterbone visits the Office

Works, owned and operated by High Industries, to purchase a printer while staying in Stone Harbor.

FMG, Ltd., had an open account, which Stan Caterbone authorized, as an officer of FMG, Ltd.,. The

Office Works demands cash payment and refuses to put the purchase on credit.

July 6, 1987 - In an effort to document the conspiracy theory, Stan Caterbone requests Tom Caterbone

to call Robert Kauffman to inquire about the status of his affairs, and to tape the conversation. Tom


3

Caterbone identifies himself as John Green, a client of Stan Caterbone's and Robert Kauffman states the

following: "Stan Caterbone has moved his office to Stone Harbor, NJ.. he is not taking care of business,

and I need to see to it that his clients are taken care of for the time being.. he has been spending a lot of

money, an airplane, a place at the shore, and he seems to think that he is too important for his traditional

clientele.. There is some history of mental disorders in his family history.. I can't come right out and say

that that is what's going on, .. I wish Stan would get some professional help.. However for the time being,

Stan is not taking care of business, and I need to be concerned for his clients.”

July 6, 1987 - Stan Caterbone telephones Dr. Al Schulz, psychiatrist at St. Joseph Hospital, and client of

Stan Caterbone's in order to thwart the allegations of insanity. Dr. Al Shulz had disclosed that several

persons, including Mary Lynn Dipaolo and Jere Sullivan had called him concerning Stan Caterbone's

behavior and activities. From the allegations, Dr. Shulz advised that Stan Caterbone was suffering from

illusions of grandeur, and prescribed Lithium treatment, and to return to Lancaster for consultation. Stan

Caterbone insisted that the allegations were purely fabricated, and that no one had any legal right to

interfere with his business and or legal affairs, let alone his confidential medical records.

July 6, 1987 - Stan Caterbone contacts David Drubner, of Boston, Ma, a friend of Stan Caterbone's

brother’s Mike, and an attorney. During the conversation, David Drubner questions Stan Caterbone

about "taking some medication", and supports the allegations of insanity.

July 6, 1987 - In the following days, Stan Caterbone had made numerous telephone calls to local, state,

and federal authorities, for intervention and help regarding all of the preceding events and

circumstances. The following is a brief description of each: Manheim Township Police Department,

responded "what bank branch repossessed your aircraft"; Pennsylvania State Senator Gib Armstrong,

responded, "I will call the Pa Attorney General's Office and have them call you; the Federal Bureau of

Investigation (FBI), the Philadelphia-based field office; U.S. Representative Robert Walker (RPa), a

detailed and explicit conversation with Mrs. Robert Walker, who would only advise Stan Caterbone to put

his situation in writing and submit it to the Congressman in his Washington, D. C. office. In addition:

David Wouls (Executive Vice President of the Lancaster chamber of Commerce & Industry), Stan

Caterbone talked at length, and in detail, making allegations of misconduct with members of the same;

National Association of securities Dealers (NASD), in Washington, D.C., Stan Caterbone discussed the

securities related violations. And also: the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC), also in

Washington, D.C., and discussed securities laws violations; the Pennsylvania Securities Commission, of

Harrisburg, Pa, discussed the implications of Stan Caterbone's illegal lockout, and his legal and formal


4

positions, including incorporating officer of FMG, Ltd., Stan Caterbone received no support or follow-up

communications concerning all of the above requests, despite his apparent emotional duress, and

extreme situation.

July 8, 1987 - A formal notification of the termination of Stan Caterbone's Registered Representative

Securities license with the Planners Securities Group Inc., of Atlanta, GA is received, with a "cc: Robert

Kauffman".

July 8, 1987 - Stan Caterbone's brothers, Steve, Phil, Mike, and Tom, arrive unexpectedly and uninvited

at the residence of Stan Caterbone's in Stone Harbor, NJ, and refuse to leave until Stan Caterbone

agrees to take Lithium and return to Lancaster to undergo treatment by Dr. Al Schulz, for mental illness.

July 16, 1987 - Stan Caterbone travels to New York, from Boston, MA, to visit with Bob Walters of Power

Station Studios, to discuss the allegations of Blackmail, and to find out who is involved, including Scott

Robertson and Power Station Studios. Stan Caterbone discusses the illegal repossession and other

related matters, however during the conversation, becomes suspicious when Bob Walters and Tony

Bongiovi disclose that the "Digital" Movie project is suddenly suspended until a later time.

July 17, 1987 - Stan Caterbone travels to Hollywood, California to meet and visit with Ted Gamillion and

Gamillion Studios (Film Studio), and Marcia Silen of Flatbush Films. Ted Gamillion had previously

solicited the consulting of Stan Caterbone in order to help reorganize the financing of the film studio, after

earlier arrangements in North Carolina had gone sour. Stan Caterbone had spent several days visiting

and touring the studio. Ted Gamillion agreed to allow Stan Caterbone to represent the studio in order to

secure the required financing. Ted Gamillion provided Stan Caterbone with substantial amounts of

confidential financial, legal, and tax documents for the project. During the visit, Marcia Silen had

disclosed to Stan Caterbone that Scott Robertson had made allegations of insanity about him (Stan

Caterbone) to persons at Power Station Studios and at Flatbush Films.

July 24, 1987 - Michael M. Hartlett sends a letter to all creditors of FMG, Ltd., informing them that stated

the following: “Stan Caterbone is no longer an officer of the corporation; he was removed from office on

July 1, 1987; he had been purchasing items under FMG, Ltd., and obtaining corporate discount and

rates; and formally notifying

them that Stan Caterbone had never had the right to purchase items through FMG, Ltd., or make

corporate commitments on behalf of FMG, Ltd., or contract or in any way obligate FMG, Ltd.,.”


5

July 30, 1987 - Stan Caterbone had paid $600 to Dr. Levine, a Psychiatrist from North field, New Jersey,

for an objective evaluation of his mental state of mind, in order to prove the fabricated allegations of

'insanity". Dr. Levine had conducted a 2 hour meeting in his residence in Stone Harbor, NJ, and required

Stan Caterbone complete the Minneapolis Multiphase Personality Inventory (MMPI). Stan Caterbone

completed the test, immediately returned it to Dr. Levine. After several weeks without any

communications from Dr. Levine, Stan Caterbone had called for the results. Dr. Levine had explained

that he had conducted telephone interviews with members of Stan Caterbone's without notice or

consent, in addition to the original request of Stan Caterbone to conduct an objective and confidential

examination. In addition, Dr. Levine prescribed Lithium drug therapy, and disclosed a diagnosis of Bi-

Polar Mood Disorder.

August 6, 1987 - The legal firm of Appel, Yost & Sorentino, of Lancaster, Pa., send a formal notice to

Stan Caterbone, demanding the return of a facsimile machine leased from the ACM company of

Lancaster, Pa. Attorney Appel advises Stan Caterbone that it is the property of FMG, Ltd., and should be

returned at once or legal action will follow.

August 8, 1987 - John M. Wolf, Executive Vice President of Commonwealth National Bank sends Stan

Caterbone a formal letter advising that the repossession of July 2, 1987 was both lawful and appropriate,

and declines to accept a settlement of $5 million for lender liability violations.

August 10, 1987 - Stan Caterbone receives a facsimile from the Board of Directors of FMG, Ltd., signed

by Robert Long threatening to file criminal charges for "embezzlement (we have checks to prove it),

burglary, employee theft, corporate opportunity and slander against our firm".

August 12, 1987 - Yolanda Caterbone, mother of Stan Caterbone, Steve, Phil, Mike, and Tom

Caterbone, all brothers, arrive unexpectedly and uninvited to the residence of Stan Caterbone in Stone

Harbor. After several requests for the visitors to leave the premises are denied, several brothers refuse

to let Stan Caterbone leave the premises. Stan Caterbone flees, and the brothers chase after him. Stan

Caterbone runs into a neighbors house to ask to use the telephone to phone the police. However, after

realizing that he is scaring the occupants, he flees to the Stone Harbor Police Department, a few blocks

away, in an effort to obtain a restraining order and to lawfully have the unwanted persons vacate his

residence and personal property. Officer Steve Conners and Officer Henry Stanford refuse the request,

and hold Stan Caterbone in custody. After some 30 minutes, the officers, accompanied by Steve and


6

Tom Caterbone, place Stan Caterbone into a Police Cruiser and proceed to the Burdette Tomlin

Hospital, in Stone Harbor. Upon arriving, Stan Caterbone is interrogated and questioned extensively

about a "gun". A hospital staffer then accuses Stan Caterbone of an attempted suicide and keeps him in

custody for 4 or more hours. Another hospital staffer performs an extensive mental health evaluation.

Stan Caterbone is given an ultimatum of signing a contract in order to be released form the hospital, the

contract stated: "I Stanley J. Caterbone will not take my life tonight or at anytime".

August 14, 1987 - The same family members again arrive unwanted at the residence of Stan Caterbone

in Stone Harbor, NJ. After another confrontation, similar to the incident of two evenings before, Stan

Caterbone fleas to the Avalon Police Department for another attempt to get a restraining order. However,

en route, just a few blocks from the Avalon Police Station, an Avalon Police cruiser pulls Stan Caterbone

over and arrests him for the following violations:

1. Driving Beyond the speed limit.

2. Driving an unregistered vehicle (all required registration materials were in Lancaster, PA)

3. Containing an empty beer can in his vehicle (which was at .1 east three days old)

In addition, the Avalon Police Department repossessed his car and locked it in the Avalon Police

Department Compound, which was his only means of transportation and communication by car phone.

August 24, 1987 - Robert Kauffman sends a letter to Millard Johnson, Stan Caterbone's client, regarding

his previous intentions of paying the $25,000 demand note of Stan Caterbone to Millard Johnson. Robert

Kauffman had previously promised to pay the debt to Millard Johnson during a meeting. Robert

Kauffman, told Millard Johnson to contact the FMG, LTD., attorney, Craig Russell in order to file legal

claim, and formally disclosed that he would: “ no longer handle any discussions concerning Stanley J.

Caterbone. “ In the last paragraph, Robert Kauffman discloses that "attorney Mr. Patterson, no longer

represents the Caterbone family regarding his pending bankruptcy or guardianship". Notes: Stan

Caterbone never gave any legal jurisdiction or rights to any family member, has never filed for

bankruptcy, was not bankrupt, or even knew of an attorney named Mr. Patterson.

September 3, 1987 - Robert Kauffman calls detective Larry Sigler or the Manheim Township Police

Department to report an alleged Terroristic threat made two days prior, on September 1, 1987, by Stan

Caterbone between the hours of 9:00 and 1 pm noontime. Detective Larry Sigler issues a warrant for the

arrest of Stan Caterbone with District Justice Murray Horton that was issued at about the same time as

the arrival of Stan Caterbone at Romar Aviation. At approximately 3:00 pm Mary Lynn Dipaolo picks Stan

Caterbone up at Romar Aviation for a scheduled visit and dinner. After Stan Caterbone becomes


7

annoyed at Mary Lynn Dipaolo's unjustified allegations, Stan Caterbone borrows her car to go home to

his residence in Conestoga and to go play basketball. At approximately 7:00 pm, upon leaving the

playground, he is approached by Nancy Arment, FMG, Ltd., secretary, who is elaborated and crying,

asking "why are you doing this?". At approximately 9:00 pm, in an attempt to recover additional stolen

personal and business tiles, Stan Caterbone proceeds to the offices of FMG, Ltd., where he is greeted by

employee Stacy Waters and allowed to enter the building. Stan Caterbone insists that Stacy Walters

accompany him throughout the building as he recovers files in the offices of Robert Kauffman, Michael

Bartlett, and Robert Long. In addition retrieving a Back-Up (FMG, Ltd, records and communications)

copy of the computer system which he integrated. Upon leaving, Stan Caterbone temporarily disconnect

the systems which he had integrated and developed for FMG, Ltd., which fall under intellectual property

rights. Stacy Walters assists Stan Caterbone in loading the tiles in his automobile, and Stan Caterbone

kisses Stacy Walters goodbye, and awaits for her safe return to the building until leaving. Upon entering

his residence later that night, Stan Caterbone is taken into custody by the Conestoga Police, and

requests that the files that he had taken out of the offices of FMG, Ltd., be taken along to prove his rights

to the property, and his position within the company. Stan Caterbone was then taken to the jurisdiction of

Manheim Township Police, where he is arrested and taken into custody.

September 4, 1987 - At approximately 2:00 am, Stan Caterbone is arraigned before District Justice

Richard R. Reeser for the following charges: Terroristic threats; burglary; unlawful restraint; unlawful use

of computers; theft by unlawful taking; robbery; and criminal mischief. Bail is set at $20,000 and Stan

Caterbone is placed in The Lancaster county prison. He was not permitted to post real estate for bail.

September 5, 1987 - The Lancaster New Era and the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal report the alleged

crimes, reporting that Stan Caterbone is an ax-employee; that FMG, Ltd., sustained $60,000 because of

his actions; and that he threatened 2 female employees. The entire arrests and reports fail to

acknowledge that Stan Caterbone is an individual lessee of the property, and in accordance with law, still

holds all of his offices of PING, Ltd., and is the founder of the company. The above incident further

facilitates the ongoing conspiracy, and publicly discredits Stan Caterbone in every way, financially,

professionally, and most importantly conveniently supports the continued allegations of insanity.

September 9, 1987 - Stan Caterbone is given an ultimatum by the Lancaster county prison authorities,

Robert Bayer, Yolanda Caterbone, and Mary Lynn Dipaolo of posting the required bail only if Stan

Caterbone voluntarily admits himself into the Psychiatric Unit of St. Joseph Hospital, or remain in the


8

Lancaster County prison. Stan Caterbone is released from Lancaster County prison, and immediately

escorted to St. Joseph Hospital and admitted into the Psychiatric Unit.

September 15, 1987 - Stan Caterbone questions the legality of the ultimatum for posting tail, and upon

learning that it is unlawful, arranges for his discharge - Upon his discharge, the St. Joseph Hospital

administrators learn that FMG, Ltd., had terminated his health insurance, and demand payment of $3,

064.60 for the six days of hospitalization. Stan Caterbone is not able to pay, and leaves the hospital and

returns to his residence of Conestoga, PA.

September 15, 1987 - Stan Caterbone receives an invoice from St. Joseph Hospital for $3,064.00.

September 16, 1987 - Stan Caterbone receives a call from Howard Eisler, an Investigator for the

Pennsylvania Securities Commission who requests a meeting with Stan Caterbone. A meeting is

scheduled for September 29, and Stan Caterbone arranges for Robert Beyer and Millard Johnson to

attend.

September 21, 1987 -ISC and the British Ferranti firm agree in principal to merge, creating what

appeared to be a $1.5 billion defense/electronics conglomerate, after six months of negotiations.

September 29, 1987 - Howard Eisler conducts a meeting at the Residence of Stan Caterbone, with all

parties consenting to have the meeting recorded by Stan Caterbone. Howard Eisler was not able to

provide a believable explanation of what he was investigating or why he had contacted Stan Caterbone.

Stan Caterbone explains all of the circumstances regarding his prior meeting with ISC/Chem Con

executive Larry Resch, and details his allegations of wrongdoing of James Guerin/ISC/Chem Con6 and

the discussions of that meeting on June 23, 1987, with ISC executive Larry Resch. Stan Caterbone also

discloses his ISC stock holdings, and his relationships with ISC and Chem Con associates. Millard

Johnson testifies to Howard Eisler during the meeting regarding a previous meeting in August with

Robert Kauffman, where Robert Kauffman tried to persuade Millard Johnson to fabricate a story that a

legitimate personal loan of $25,000 to Stan Caterbone in June of 1987, was instead intended for

investment and embezzled by Stan Caterbone. Robert Kauffman wanted Millard Johnson to support this

story to authorities. Stan Caterbone spent more than 4 hours explaining and detailing all of his

allegations and business activities including how he founded and built Financial Management Group,

Ltd.,; his mortgage banking activities; the illegal repossession of his aircraft; all of the fabricated arrests;

and the chronology of events after the June 23 meeting with ISC executive Larry Resch. Howard Eisler

ended the meeting and requested copies of documents from Stan Caterbone.


9

October 2, 1987 - District Justice Murray Horton conducts a preliminary hearing for all criminal charges

against Stan Caterbone. Attorney Robert Beyer refuses to discuss any issues regarding his individual

lease of the FMG, Ltd., offices, or any issues resulting in the illegal activities of anyone other than Stan

Caterbone District Justice Murray Horton orders Stan Caterbone to defend all of the criminal charges in

the next term of criminal court in Lancaster County. Stan Caterbone ordered to be bound over for the

next term of criminal court of Lancaster County.

October 18, 1987 - The Unemployment Compensation Review Board formally and officially decides

against a claim for benefits by Stan Caterbone and cites misconduct and wrongdoing as the reasons.

October 27, 1987 - Lancaster Aviation files a civil suit with District Justice Murray Horton for alleged

unpaid bills of some $5,000.

November 9, 1987 - Stan Caterbone visits with Parent Federal Savings and Loan's president, John

Depatto, to discuss him problems in meeting his current mortgage payments. John Depatto immediately

disclosed to Stan Caterbone that foreclosure proceedings have officially begun, and that the full loan of

approximately $110,000 is immediately due. Stan Caterbone stands up from the conference table and

declares, "You tell Mr. James Guerin he is in trouble", and abruptly walks out of the offices.

November 23, 1987- A Referees Decision by the unemployment Compensation Review Board upholds a

recent decision to deny Stan Caterbone from collecting any benefits, again citing misconduct and

wrongdoing. Stan Caterbone calls Howard Fisler, of the Pennsylvania Securities Commission and

demands an explanation for not returning to obtain any documents as promised in the meeting of

September 29th. The phone call was recorded.

November 25, 1987 - Stan Caterbone receives a letter from the Pennsylvania Securities Commission,

Howard Zisler, citing a misunderstanding and lack of communication, and now requests that Stan

Caterbone submit a written complaint of all allegations discussed in the meeting of September 29, 1987.

November 26, 1987 - Stan Caterbone visits the Pennsylvania State Police barracks in Lancaster, to file

a formal complaint to the White Collar Crime Division. Stan Caterbone was treated as if he was making

the entire story up, and received no help.


10

December 4, 1987 - Financial Management Group, Ltd., holds its first annual shareholders meeting, for

the year ended June 30, 1987, at the Treadway Resort Inn. In an effort to promote propaganda against

Stan Caterbone, and to support the fabricated allegations of insanity, FMG, Ltd., president hired armed

security personnel to guard the doorways of the meeting, insinuating that the meeting was under a threat

of violence, and to collaborate his recent allegations of Terroristic threats, which Stan Caterbone was

previously arrested and awaiting trial.

December 17, 1987 - The United States Postal Inspector acknowledges receipt of formal complaint from

Stan Caterbone regarding executives from FMG, Ltd., illegally changing or address; opening of

confidential personal and business mail; and withholding and possibly destroying confidential personal

and business mail at Stan Caterbone's leased property of 1755 Oregon Pike, Lancaster, PA, also the

headquarters of FMG, Ltd.,.

January 26, 1988 - The Pennsylvania Homeowners Emergency Mortgage Assistance Program formally

and officially denies Stan Caterbone of benefits citing the following: " Applicant was terminated from job

FMG, Ltd.,), therefore was not suffering from circumstances beyond his control".

March 14, 1988 - Stan Caterbone is served notice by Lancaster Constables regarding Parent Federal

.Guerin' Bank) v. Stan Caterbone Mortgage Foreclosure of his residence at 2323 New Danville Pike,

Conestoga, PA.

May 1988 - Stan Caterbone is forced to sell his residence, and subdues to the undo influence that he

was responsible for all circumstances, and moves to Florida with his brother.

Sep 15, 1988 - Seven Chem-Con executives, including Christian, are criminally indicted for the firms $15

million defense contracting fraud.

October 23, 1988 -Stan Caterbone, destitute, without a personal residence, automobile, or any income,

and with accumulated debts of more than $65,000 from all related incidents in the 1987 "Blackmail", sells

his FMG, Ltd., holdings to Robert Kauffman and is given $72,000 in proceeds at settlement. This by and

of itself will be proven to be extortion. Robert Kauffman was in fear of Stan Caterbone exercising his

large voting rights in the upcoming FMG, Ltd., annual shareholders meeting, which included the election

off FMG, Ltd., Board of Directors. Stan Caterbone had approximately 19% of the outstanding shares of


11

FMG, Ltd., and had the potential to vote someone of his selection to a Board seat. Scott Robertson had

solicited the deal for both parties, and acted as negotiator for both.

July 19, 1989 - Stan Caterbone, Scott Robertson, and American Helix agree on a one year employment

contract, which American Helix will never fulfill in its entirety, and will be terminated in the following April.

April 1990 - The American Helix Board of Directors, lead by S. Dale High/High Industries, vote to

terminate Scott Robertson of American Helix, and to discontinue the financing of the CD-ROM

business which Stan Caterbone was directly involved. The joint venture agreement with Network

Technologies, or Washington, D.C., had lost an estimated $450,000 in the past 9 months, and the

technologies, which were to be delivering revenues, had proven to be worthless. Scott Robertson had

solicited, negotiated, and administer the deal, Stan Caterbone had raised serious concerns at to the

capabilities of both the technologies, the business, and Network Technologies, early in the project. High

Industries then conducted several meetings with Stan Caterbone to purchase the business, however,

Stan Caterbone had told the executive in a meeting on Good Friday, that he was solely responsible for

any business that was left, and any there was no real value. High Industries agreed to pay Stan

Caterbone his weekly consulting tee only until June 30, in hopes of negotiating an agreement to keep

American Helix in the CD-RON business, which was only feasible with Stan Caterbone, because of his

knowledge and expertise in "Digital" technologies.

August 2, 1990 - Stan Caterbone discovers that in July, Fulton Bank embezzled $5,000 from the

checking account of Stan Caterbone due to an error by Fulton Bank's accounting department Fulton

Bank refused to credit the account for more than 60 days, without crediting the lost interest income.

Dec 12, 1990 - Ferranti reports a near $40 million loss for the first half year, but says it hopes to begin

showing a profit before year-end in March 1991a Stan Caterbone receives a call from James Christian

while in custody in the Loretto State prison. Stan Caterbone asked Jim Christian if he had authorized or

had knowledge about the June 23, 1987 meeting between himself and ISC executive Larry Reach.

James Christian answered the question as follows:

"I never knew of such a meeting, authorized a meeting with Larry and yourself. Larry (Reseb) was the

courier for Jim Guerin, that is how I and Chem Con got set up and used as the scapegoat to divert

attention away from “You

should talk to Earnest Schriber of Lancaster Newspapers, you can trust him.. Guerin's attorney (Tate)

called to offer


12

me $1.00 to settle my $93 million law suit against Guerin".

Dec 14, 1990 - At a Christmas party of Bradley DeForge's, Mike Dipaolo, during a conversation with Stan

Caterbone, had stated that "You (Stan Caterbone) had Guns and Knives in 1987" as the reason for the mental illness

fabrications. NOTES: Stan Caterbone quickly left the party. In addition, during the same time, other such

statements from friends, regarding his present "mental condition", began to mysteriously resurface only after

knowledge of his activities to take legal recourse for the 1987 incidents, and to pursue his due access to the law.

Stan Caterbone, in order to get work accomplished on the project, traveled to Captiva Island, and continued his

project, the "AMG Legal Systems Prototype" disc. The "AMO Legal Systems Prototype" project was a CD-ROM

system, designed by Stan Caterbone, that would include all of his relevant information concerning his alleged ISC

Cover-Up, including audio conversations, and authentic documents, all stored on one optical disc, or a CD-ROM.

The disc and system was finally completed on May 16, 1991.

December 20, 1990 -Stan Caterbone telephones his cousin Ron Roda, from Captiva Island, Florida, to

inform him that he will arrive home in a few days. During the conversation, Ron Roda, disclosed to Stan

Caterbone that both Jim Warner and Jere Sullivan had made telephone call to his brothers, Phil and

Tom, and made allegations of insanity about Stan Caterbone, and advised the need for medication.

December 23, 1990 -Stan Caterbone forwards a letter to the Department of Defense Mapping Agency

regarding his bid for the $2.5 million CDROM contract (DMA 700-90-0011), then in negotiations. Stan

Caterbone alleges misconduct in the procurement and for the first time publicly discloses his allegations

of Blackmail immediately following his meeting with ISC executive Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.

January 9, 1991 - Lt. Madenspacher of the Manheim Township Police Department call Stan Caterbone

at his lab/office in him home at approximately 2:00 pm. Lt. Madenspacher explains that he had received

a copy of the letter to the Department of Defense, that Detective Larry Mathias had forwarded to him. Lt.

Madenspacher questioned his motives of the letter and stated: "What are you going to do.. We (Manheim

Township Police Department) just don't want to see a multi-million dollar law suit come down our way.."

Stan Caterbone responded, "You know that I was an individual lessee of that property, and in addition I

had never resigned any offices or my Board of Director's seat of FMG, Ltd., .. You also know that I had

met with Larry Resch of ISC on June 2S, 1987, and that I made allegations of misconduct.." Lt.

Madenspacher responded, "We were forced into that (the arrests of Stan Caterbone on Sept. 3, 1987),

we were caught between a rock and a hard place, we were forced into that".


13

Lt. Madenspacher then changed the subject to "Digital" technologies, and described the activities of the

police department of using the same in the telephone surveillance of criminal suspects. Lt.

Madenspacher then requested to meet with Stan Caterbone. Stan Caterbone agreed, however due to his

current busy schedule, confirmed he would contact him later to schedule a meeting.

January 10, 1991 - Stan Caterbone sends a letter to Lt. Madenspacher of the Manheim Township Police

Department, to schedule a meeting for Thursday, Jan. 17th at 3:00 pm, at his office at American Helix

Technology Corporation, at the Green field Corporate Park. Stan Caterbone requested a response only if the time

was in conflict of his schedule.

January 17, 1991 - Lt. Madenspacher fails to show up for the scheduled meeting with Stan Caterbone at

Amen can Helix, and never contacted him before that date to change the meeting, or called to apologize

for not being able to keep the prior commitment.

January 18, 1991 - Stan Caterbone sends documents concerning the Blackmail" of 1987 to several

reporters of the Lancaster Newspapers,: Tim MeKeele; Earnest Schreiber; and Thomas Planner. Tim

MeKeele also received a tape with some excerpts of the September 29, 1987 meeting with the PA

Securities Commission, where Stan Caterbone discusses allegations of misconduct against J. Guerin

and ISC.

January 19, 1991 - High Industries American Helix illegally and without notice locks Stan Caterbone out

of his office and the facility of American Helix, who was currently under a joint venture agreement with

Stan Caterbone and his Advanced Media Group, Ltd., for his digital technologies business. NOTES::

This "Lock-Out" was similar to that of FMG, Ltd., on July 1, 1987. Again conveniently when Stan

Caterbone had raised issues and allegations involving Guerin and ISC.

January 21, 1991 - In fear and confused about his involvement, and in respect to the massive fraud of

the ISC/Ferranti merger, Stan Caterbone sends a package to Ferranti’s legal counsel in England by way

of United Postal Service' Overnight International Delivery Service (Tracking Number 1773 0619 670).

NOTES: Stan Caterbone was in fear that a potential "Cover-Up" by U.S. authorities, and specifically the

Lancaster community, would place his life in danger, and wanted to insure that the information

concerning his knowledge of ISC misconduct before the lSC/Ferranti merger, and his disclosure to local,

state, and federal authorities in the summer of 1987, at least would be received by Ferranti, reducing the


14

possibility of someone terminating his life in order so that these circumstances would not be used as an

asset in the present Ferranti Legal efforts.

Jan 22, 1991 - In an effort to support his allegations of misconduct and the allegedly threatening

activities of Stan Caterbone, American Helix president Dave Dering has all of the locks in the building

changed by a professional locksmith, which is nothing more than an act of propaganda.

February 1, 1991 - ABC News 20/20 features the story "Weapons Sales to Iraq" about the ISC/Cardoen

cluster bomb technology and how it got to Saddam Husain. Feb 17, 1991 - Stan Caterbone receives a

letter from Sandra K. Paul, of the Citizens Ambassador Program, a division of People to People

International, notifying him that he has been selected to participate in the upcoming Printing and

Publishing Delegation to the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in the coming August. People to People

International are a nonprofit organization started by the late Dwight D. Eisenhower to facilitate the

communications of experts from various professions throughout the world. The objective of the

delegation was to exchange ideas, information, and technologies of the printing and publishing industries

with American counterparts in the Soviet Union, and various Eastern European countries.

February 22, 1991 - Federal prosecutors seize $800,000 from Clark, claiming he was privy to

information about ongoing criminal acts within ISC that generated the tainted cash.

February 1991 -In an American Helix staff meeting, with all employees present, but Stan Caterbone,

president David Dering had spent approximately 20 minutes alleging that Stan Caterbone almost ruined

his company, and that he "is a runaway ex-convict, that will end up in jail very soon". The above

discussion was disclosed by engineer Al Thornburg, immediately following the meeting.

May 23, 1991 - At approximately 2:00 pm, Jay Curtis, (appearing as a Department of Defense contractor,

who had recently solicited the services of Stan Caterbone and his Advanced Media Group, Ltd., to

provide engineering in the development of "Digital" simulation and training applications for various U.S.

Military Logistics bases) had called Stan Caterbone. The following is synopsis of the conversation:

"Because of your recent discussions concerning your knowledge and information about the ISC Scandal,

and an alleged "Cover-Up", I had to do a background check on you, to insure against any problems when

including you in by proposal to the U.S. Department of Defense... Everyone backs up your story, and is

looking over your documents now, including the CIA, IRS, SEC, FBI, Scotland Yard, Attorney General,

the British M-4, and others. They are all verifying and confirming your "cover-up" allegations.. They don't


15

know what to tell the Press and Media "I also know that you submitted documents to Mr. Thomas

Flannery of the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal". "How did you know about the CIA and its involvement

with ISC, how did you know that, and what do you know?" NOTES: Jay Curtis kept pushing Stan

Caterbone on the CIA issue, and what he had known and how he knew, Stan Caterbone kept telling him

that the whole situation was to emotional, and that he was afraid for his life. Stan Caterbone had to

eventually tell Mr. Curtis that he could not discuss this anymore. He abruptly changed the subject and

hung up on Mr. Curtis. Stan Caterbone immediately went to a friends house, and disclosed that fact that

he was in fear for his life. He quitly sat on the steps with his friend, Abby. Later that night, his friend Dave

Pflumm would take him to the corner bar for a few drinks, while unknowing to Stan Caterbone, Ted

Koppel was disclosing the story of the CIA’s involvement with ISC. Several hours later, Ted Koppel broke

the story about the CIA and ISC's covert operations to sell arms to Iraq. Immediately following the

conversation with Mr. Jay Curtis regarding the CIA and ISC, Stan Caterbone packed a suitcase and

confidential information assets, in preparation to leave Lancaster, in total and legitimate fear for his life.

May 23, 1991 - ABC News/Nightline and Ted Koppel feature the first in a series of stories, relating to CIA

knowledge of a covert operation to supply munitions to south Africa implemented by ISC and Carlos

Cardoen. The story featured Lancaster and ISC. The report ties Guerin to the National Security Agency

project in the 1970’s. The report was investigated by ABC News, the Financial Times of London, and the

Lancaster Intelligencer News. Tom Flannery of the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal, appeared on the

program and was given credits on the show.

May 24, 1991 - The Lancaster Intelligencer Journal reports on the above story. At approximately 1:30

pm, Stan Caterbone drives out of Lancaster, en route to a safe haven, and stops at a convenience store

and reads the early edition of the Lancaster New Era, learning for the first time of ABC News/Nightline

story about ISC and the CIA the evening before, just hours after his conversation regarding the same to

Jay Curtis.

June 7, 1991 - Stan Caterbone is again arrested by the Stone Harbor Police. After passing several

sobriety tests, and two Breathalyzer tests, Stan Caterbone is placed in a jail cell, and refused to be

released. Several hours later, Stan Caterbone is cited for outstanding arrests warrants of Avalon, NJ,

dated back to August 14, 1987, by an officer of the Avalon Police department who suddenly appeared.

Both arresting officers demanded $340.00 for the posting of bail. Stan Caterbone requested that the

required cash be retrieved from his car, located just a few blocks away. The Avalon police officer


16

responded by saying, "we can't let you go to your car, you may have a gun in there". Stan Caterbone

was immediately escorted to the cape May county Prison, fingerprinted and processed.

June 8, 1987 - Stan Caterbone calls Mike Orstein, Lt. of the Stone Harbor police patrol, and requests

that he retrieve the required cash from his car, and post the required bail. At approximately 2:30 pm,

Stan Caterbone is released on bail.

June 11, 1991 - Stan Caterbone left the Stone Harbor Marina at approximately 12:30 am en route to

Lancaster, Pa, to retrieve some files concerning the ISC cover-up. Upon driving north on Route 47 (the

normal route to Lancaster), approximately 10 miles outside the Cape May county Courthouse, Stan

Caterbone noticed a car following him closely. Suspicious, Stan Caterbone decreased his speed from 55

mph to 35 mph, in order for the car to pass him. However, the car remained directly behind, adjusting the

speed accordingly. In an effort to elude the car, without raising suspicion, Stan Caterbone gradually

increased his speed, while also increasing the distance between the cars, resulting in the loss of his

taillights to the ensuing vehicle - Because of the winding road, Stan Caterbone looked for an abrupt turn-

off, in hopes of dashing the eluding vehicle, by loosing sight of his taillights. There was little or no traffic

on the route during the early morning hours, and Stan Caterbone stopped at an intersection, and noticed

that the headlights of the ensuing vehicle were not visible in his rear view mirror, meaning that his

taillights were also not visible to the ensuing vehicle. Immediately upon pulling from the intersection, Stan

Caterbone noticed a narrow dirt road that lead into a field of small trees, the perfect place to sit for the

ensuing auto to pass him, unnoticed. The ensuing vehicle pulled to the intersection, and continued north

on route 47, in the direction of Lancaster. Stan Caterbone sat in his vehicle a few minutes, until

continuing on his travel, north on Route 47. Approximately five (5) minutes later, a car traveling in excess

of SS mph, approached Stan Caterbone, traveling south on the same road (2 lanes) As the two cars

approached each other, and approximately 30 yards from reaching each other, the approaching vehicle

drove directly into the lane of Stan Caterbone, with its high beams on, and continued straight for his

vehicle, or what appeared to be a head-on-collision. Stan Caterbone drove off of the berm of the road,

missing a line of trees by less than 12 inches (eluding a life threatening disaster), and passed the vehicle

that was still in the north bound lane, heading south. Stan Caterbone, shaking and sweating furiously,

noticed the cars brake lights go on, and the car apparently turned around, and began pursuing Stan

Caterbone again. Stan Caterbone drove as fast as he could to Route 55, hoping to find traffic in order to

hide and loose the pursuing car. Stan Caterbone arrived in Lancaster, at approximately 3:00 am, and

again noticed a car sitting in the parking lot of the vacant "Sportsman's Den", at the intersection of the

New Danville Pike and Prince Streets. Upon driving west on Hershey Avenue, Stan Caterbone noticed


17

the car following him. In an effort to identify the license plate, Stan Caterbone made a few turns in the

area of Hamilton Watch, and followed the car heading north on S. West End Avenue. The car was a late

model, gold or tan, Cougar or possibly a Buick Park Avenue. Stan Caterbone watched the car increase

his speed, and finally changed directions and proceeded to his residence, and parked a few blocks

away, and walked through the woods, to his apartment in the Hershey Heritage complex. Stan

Caterbone then used a flashlight, in order not to reveal his presence, and returned to his vehicle,

sometime in the early morning, during daylight.

June 19, 1991 - Stan Caterbone leaves Stone Harbor, in constant fear for his life, and remains in

seclusion, in various parts of Eastern Seacoast, spanning from Captiva Island, Florida, to Boston, MA, in

order to prepare an official request Congressional Investigation of all related matters.

Jul 11, 1991 - Stan Caterbone files an official request C300 pages) for a Congressional Investigation into

all of the ISC and preceding issues with U. S. Representative Robert Walker CR-Pennsylvania), and

Speaker of the House, U. S. Representative Thomas Foley. Overnight Mail Service of the United States

Post Office, outside of Baltimore, Maryland, sent both requests.

July 12, 1991 - Stan Caterbone returns to his home, in Lancaster, PA, at approximately 12:00 pm, after

remaining in seclusion immediately following the phone conversation of May 23, 1991 with Jay Curtis,

regarding the CIA and ISC. ABC News/Nightline features it's second story about Lancaster's ISC and

Arms to South Africa and Iraq.

July 18, 1991 - U.S. Representative Robert Walker sends a letter to Stan Caterbone relating to his

request for a Congressional Investigation into all of his allegations of misconduct and criminal

wrongdoing regarding his alleged ISC/Fraud "cover-up". The letter said : "Thank you for your recent letter

and information on International Signal & Control corporation. I appreciate your thinking of me; however,

since this case is before the courts, it is unethical for me to interfere with judicial process. If you think I

may be of assistance with other matters, please feel free to contact me".

August 1, 1991 - Stan Caterbone receives a notice of a warrant for his arrest by the Stone Harbor (NJ)

Municipal Court, regarding summons #081370. Stan Caterbone called the Court Clerk, Pam Davidson, to

explain the circumstances. The Court Clerk refused to identify herself, and did not have time to listen to

his explanation. She then questioned why he (Stan Caterbone) wanted to write to the Judge to explain.

Stan Caterbone writes a formal letter to Judge Peter M. Tourison, of the Stone Harbor Municipal Court

explaining his allegations of misconduct, and the issues surrounding his recent arrest of June 7th, and all


18

of the arrests dating back to August of 1987. Stan Caterbone had described in detail his assertions and

evidence that the arrests were conveniently orchestrated while he was seeking legal recourse for the

alleged ISC "Cover-Up'. Stan Caterbone also explained his fear for not returning to the Stone Harbor

Municipality, in light of the fabricated arrests, and other questionable incidents. Stan Caterbone

requested another means of settling all outstanding frivolous traffic violations, other than appearing in

Stone Harbor Municipal Court. Stone Harbor Municipal Court Judge, Peter M. Tourison, sends Stan

Caterbone an official letter acknowledging receipt of his previous letter and explanations. Judge Tourison

concluded his notice by demanding that Stan Caterbone appear in Court, as scheduled, "to have this

matter taken care of in the proper manner.

August 13, 1991 - Ferranti announces it has recovered $650,000 hidden by Guerin in a number of Swiss

Hank accounts. Ferranti also announces a fiscal 1991 loss of $282 million. Stan Caterbone responds to

Judge Tourison letter of August 8, and discloses the recent attempt on his life, the past June, just outside

or Stone Harbor, and states that because of the apparent criminal conspiracy within the same

municipality, Stan Caterbone formally notifies the Judge that he refuses to return to Court, as requested.

August 15, 1991 - Guerin and Cardoen are shown to have been deeply involved in a failed $100 million

arms procurement plot linked to the infamous Iran-Contra scandal.

August 16, 1991 - Stan Caterbone receives a formal notice and demand from American Helix President

David D. Dering, for the return or equipment, currently in the possession of Stan Caterbone, and notice

of the termination of the business agreement, dated October 1, 1990 between Stan J. Caterbone and

American Helix Technology Corporation. Stan Caterbone receives a facsimile from Mike Hess (former

ISC engineer who frequented S. Africa and who solicited Stan Caterbone in late 1989 for work), and

refuses to sign a non-disclosure agreement with Stan Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,

as requested to continue a further relationship considering the recent activities from the May 23rd phone

call and the national media publicity regarding the ISC Scandal.

August 19, 1991 - Stan Caterbone sends a letter to attorney Timothy Lanza via the Lancaster Bar

Association, and asks for an explanation as to his misrepresenting to Stan Caterbone for the past month

that his order for Advanced Media Group, Ltd., stock certificates were ordered, when in fact Stan

Caterbone verified with authorized personnel of the H. Burr Kein company that the order was never

placed. Timothy Lanza had personally disclosed to Stan Caterbone on several occasions that he was

awaiting the delivery of the certificate kit via UPS. Stan Caterbone responds to the previous letter of


19

David D. Dering, and his request for the return of American Helix equipment, currently in the possession

of Stan Caterbone. Stan Caterbone formally notifies David Dering that the equipment will be held as

collateral, according to statutes of the Pa. Uniform Commercial Credit code, that the equipment will not

he returned until the past due invoice {# 1018), of the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., of July 12, 1991 for

$4,914.00, which was due upon receipt according to their business agreement, was paid in full.

August 29, 1991 - A federal judge dismisses Christian's $93 million suit against Guerin, but Christian

vows to re file the suit.

September 13, 1991 - ABC News/Nightline features another story about ISC, the CIA, and Arms Deals,

in preparation for the beginning of the-Confirmation Hearings of George Bush's nomination or the

Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Gates, which begins just three days away, by the

Senate Intelligence Committee.

September 14, 1991 - Ferranti and Clark reach an agreement to settle their legal battle, although either

party does not disclose details. September 16, 1991 - The first day of the Robert Gates' Confirmation

Hearings brings questioning by Senator Murkowski, of the Senate Intelligence Committee, about

knowledge of the ISC operations by Robert Gates. Gates, whose candor about Iran-Contra resulted in

his 1987 withdraw when nominated for the same slot by then President Reagan. In a less-than sincere

line of questioning, Robert Gates denies any knowledge of ISC, Guerin, or Carlos Cardoen, including any

operations to sell munitions to Iraq or South Africa. In addition, he denies any knowledge of any CIA

involvement in the same.

September 19, 1991- Stan Caterbone visits the office of Senator Bill Bradley (D-New Jersey), in the Hart

Office Building, Washington, D.C., and delivers documents, tapes, and a video, all relating to his

allegations of an alleged "Cover-Up" regarding the ISC Scandal. Assistant Jackie Widrow, who signed a

receipt, took the materials.

September 21, 1991- Stan Caterbone delivers a contract for the consulting services he has agreed to

provide to J. Oman Landis, in order to insure against any wrongdoing, and especially in light of Mr.

Landis' assertion the previous Friday that "you (Stan Caterbone) are taking a break (from business) to

rest your mind". This assertion conveniently supports the alibi of mental insanity, that has been made by

numerous persons, including Mr. Landis' friends, the High's, who wholly own American Helix Technology

Corporation. Several hours after delivering the contract to Mr. Landis, and after beginning to work, as


20

outlined in the contract, Mr. Landis called Stan Caterbone into his office and said "there were some

developments over the weekend, why don't you continue on your normal duties of driving (limousines),

this has nothing to do with the contract that you asked me to sign".

October 1, 1991 - Stan Caterbone receives a facsimile from David Dering, President of American Helix,

formally charging Stan Caterbone with charges of 16,730.00. David Dering also demands that the

equipment be returned, and upon receipt, American Helix would forgive $11,816.00 ($16,730 -

$4914)(Caterbone's invoice) of unpaid charges to Stan Caterbone and or the Advanced Media Group,

Ltd., Stan Caterbone sends by certified mail, a copy of a recent complaint (filed Sep. 6, 1991) to the New

Jersey Department of Motor Vehicles, and a demand for the title to his boat, and again allegations of

criminal wrongdoing by the Stone Harbor Marina, for not delivering title, given the bill of sale was

satisfied on June 10, 1991, and a fee for the title was paid as well. Stan Caterbone personally meets with

Ted Koppel, of ABC News/Nightline, at the Washington National Airport, at approximately 5:30 pm. Stan

Caterbone questioned Ted Koppel if he knew a Mr. Jay Curtis, and why he was questioned about the

CIA's involvement with the ISC affairs, just hours before the broadcast. Ted Koppel denied any

knowledge of Mr. Jay Curtis, and stated that Thomas Flannery was involved in the broadcast requested

the phone number of Stan Caterbone, and said that he would contact him later, due to his present time

constraints, and asked "what do you want, and what is the story line?" Stan Caterbone responded,

"Justice and protection, someone is trying to cover me up, and someone already made attempts on my

life... someone keeps getting information from me, while I'm left sitting in Lancaster like a sitting duck".

October 2, 1991 - Stan Caterbone responds by facsimile, to the Oct. 1, correspondence, to David D.

Dering. NOTES: Stan Caterbone requested supportive documentation regarding the suspicious charges

of $16,730.00 as declared, in order to consider the request for the return of the equipment. David C.

Dering responds by facsimile, demanding for Stan Caterbone to meet him at the Holiday Inn, in

Lancaster on Friday, Oct 4th, with the equipment in his possession, and states that he will deliver the

required supportive documentation of the charges as requested.

October 2, 1991 - Stan Caterbone responds by facsimile to Ted Koppel, as to his question concerning

the "story line" October 31, 1991 - Guerin and 19 others, including Larry Reach, are indicted on 75

criminal counts by the Philadelphia based grand jury. Laura McQueen, administrator for the New Jersey

Department of Motor Vehicles, called Stan Caterbone at approximately 3:30 pm, to notify him that she

was trying to sort out the problem with his complaint regarding title to his boat. Ms. McQueen

acknowledged that the Stone Harbor Marina had submitted an application for a title, apparently dated on

or about June 10, however the identity of the boat did not match that of for Stan Caterbone’s. Ms.


21

McQueen also admitted that there seemed to be evidence of wrongdoing, but denied to state whether

the matter was presently being investigated. Ms. McQueen also stated that the title in question was being

microfiche, and that within a few days, they should be able to trace the title, and resolve the problem.

Robert Clyde Ivy, Terrance Faulds, Wayne Radcliffe, Gerald Schuler, and Thomas Jaslin enter not guilty

pleas to all charges handed down by the Philadelphia grand jury.

November 24, 1987 - Robert Shireman, ISC financial executive pleads his guilt in the ISC $billion fraud

and scandal.

November 25, 1987 - Anthony Stagq, ISC executive in charge of Singapore operations, pleads guilty in

the Arms Export violations.

November 27, 1987- ISC Executive Larry Resch pleads guilty to his role in the massive contract fraud in

the Ferranti/ISC merger of November, 1987.

December 3, 1991 - Philadelphia grand jury hands down a "superseding indictment", clarifying the

money laundering portion of the charges. The indictment states that between November of 1986 and

June of 1989, Guerin looped $450 million through phony bank, vendor, -and customer accounts to give

the appearance several of the bogus ISC contracts were real. The preceding information also allows for

the possibility of an indictment of William Clark, and possibly his attorney Joseph Roda. The largest of

the fake contracts was the Pakistan Missile deal, in which Larry Resch was charged and indicted by the

grand jury for managing. Stan Caterbone's best friend in the whole world, little "Abbey Pflumm", shouts

his name, "Taan", for the first time.

December 3, 1991 -Mike Hess, a former ISC engineer that also has done work for Stan Caterbone, visits

Stan Caterbone to deliver all materials in his possession which is the property of the Advanced Media

Group, Ltd., Stan Caterbone and Mike Hess engage in an argument when Mike Hess becomes annoyed

at Stan Caterbone’s continued caution and suspicion of Mike Hess's real motives and agenda for the

relationship. Stan Caterbone had witnessed several incidents of inconsistencies with the attitude of Mike

Hess, with specific respect regarding Stan Caterbone's efforts for justice and legal recourse concerning

the affairs of 1987. Stan Caterbone admitted in several occasions that he will never trust anyone,

especially given his former association with ISC, and most importantly his activities and travel to South

Africa.


22

December 4, 1991 - Stan Caterbone calls the Citizens Commission of Human Rights, after seeing the

organization featured on the Murray Povich Show, and talks to Roy Griffen. The organization's mission is

to investigate abuses within the mental illness profession. Roy Griffen requests information, and agrees

to investigate his allegations. Stan Caterbone states that he will Federal Express a copy of this

chronology.

December 5, 1991 - At approximately 10:00 am, Stan Caterbone sent a package of information via

Federal Express (tracking number 9734766S93) to:

Roy Griffen

Citizens Commission for Human Rights

6362 Hollywood Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90028

(800) 869-2247

The package was received at 9:56 am (PST) by L. Mezkerlsl, at the front desk.

December 5, 1991 - At approximately 4:52 pm, James Guerin pleads guilty to eight (B) grand jury

indictments of October 31. The indictments are as follows:

?? Criminal Conspiracy

?? Violation, Arms Export Control Act

?? Violation, Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid act.

?? Money Laundering

?? Securities Fraud

?? Filing False Income Tax Return

?? Aiding and Abetting the Commission of crime.

Sentencing is scheduled for February 25, 1992, with a minimum of 14 years, and a maximum of Life in

prison.

December 4, 1991 - Stan Caterbone receives uninvited visitors at his residence, cousin Sam Miller

family, who in September left him stranded in Florida. They conveniently need a place to stay, while

visiting in Lancaster, and purposely cause distractions to his efforts for legal recourse.


23

December 11, 1991- Stan Caterbone finally requests that Michelle and Jason Miller vacate his

residence.

December 20, 1991- Stan Caterbone receivers a notice from the Internal Revenue Service regarding a

discrepancy in income reported on his 1989 Federal Income Tax Return. The items in question were his

"disability income" from Monarch life insurance and American Helix "non-employee income".

December 23, 1991- Stan Caterbone responds to the IRS letter and submits a copy of the chronology of

this conspiracy, along with the entire audio transcript (2 - 90 minute cassettes) of his meeting of

September 29, 198? with the Pennsylvania Securities Finding of Facts Resulting in Chapter 11

Bankruptcy Page 41 Commission and requests assistance in his ordeal. The correspondence was sent

via 'Return Receipt Requested" in order to insure proof of delivery. Stan Caterbone sends an updated

chronology to Roy Griffen of the Citizen's Commission for Human Rights.

December 28, 1991- Stan Caterbone sends a formal notice to attorney Howard Cerny, 245 Park

Avenue, New York, informing him to return the previously submitted information and tapes regarding this

case, and also informing him that he no longer wishes to discuss these issues with him or any member of

his firm.

December 30, 1991- Stan Caterbone travels to the U.S. 9:50 am courthouse in Philadelphia, PA, and

personally delivers the chronology and a copy of the "1987" Pennsylvania Securities Commission

meeting to Chief Judge Bechtel, who is presiding over the ISC court preceding. 10:00 am Stan

Caterbone visits the U.S. Attorney Generals office in the same building and files a formal complaint,

"Criminal Conspiracy to "cover-up" the International Signal a Control scandal. The proper form is filed

with the clerk. Assistant U. S. Attorney General Gray asks Stan Caterbone to briefly describe his

complaint. Stan Caterbone gives Gray the chronology along with the tapes. Stan Caterbone briefly

describes the meeting of June 23, 1987 with Larry Resch, the nay 23, 1991 phone call from Jay Curtis,

the arrests by Manheim Township, and the attempts on his life. Agent Gray took notes, and said he is not

familiar with the case, but would personally see that the information is passed to the proper authorities

involved in the case. During the conversation, Mr. Gray asked the exact same question that was asked

by both Joe Roda and Investigator Eisler of the Pennsylvania Securities Commission) "But you did not

work for them (ISC), you were not involved with them?" Stan Caterbone gave this response to all

questions by Mr. Gray: It's all in there (the chronology), all of the information and events".


24

January 6, 1992 - Stan Caterbone sends a copy of the criminal conspiracy chronology and a complete

audio transcript of the PA SEC meeting of 1987 to the legal counsel of the Pennsylvania Securities

Commission via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested: P825 695 935.

January 8, 1992 - At a "Town Meeting" in Columbia, Pennsylvania held by U. S. Senator Arlen Spector,

Stan Caterbone personally delivers a copy of the criminal conspiracy chronology to Anon Spector after

the meeting and asks Arlen Spector to read the letter, Mr. Spector replied, " I will do that".

January 9, 1992 - Stan Caterbone receives the Return Receipt from the Pennsylvania SEC, signed by

Sharon F. Heinspach on January 8, 1992.

November 8, 1997 Stan Caterbone solicits Attorney Matt Samley, of the law firm of Xelkallis, Reese and

Pugh, to provide a legal opinion as to the circumstances involved in the cover up. Mr. Samley quickly

asks if anyone had called Stan Caterbone about the issues. Mr. Samley agrees to review the documents

and will provide a legal opinion of any criminal and prosecutorial misconduct.

November 23, 1997 - Stan Caterbone delivers materials to Mr. Samley and also sends via Federal

Express the same materials to Christina Rainville, of Shnader, Harris, Lewis, and ……. With a letter

requesting a legal opinion from Ms. Rainville.

December, 8, 1997 - Ms. Pam Pflumm call Dr. Albert Shultz regarding the behavior of Stan Caterbone.

December 15, 1997 - Stan Caterbone telephones Jim Christian to again confirm that he did not have

knowledge of his meeting with Mr. Larry Resch. Jim Christian began threatening Stan Caterbone from

public disclosure of these issues; he said, “You have to forget about it. Your life will be worse off than it is

now, you better just forget it”

January 14, 1998 - Stan Caterbone visits with Fr. Edward Lavelle for advice and guidance concerning

his situation. Stan Caterbone only asked that Fr. Lavelle call Mr. David Pflumm, and ask he and is key

employees refrain from inflicting any additional mental duress upon his person Fr. Lavelle refuses unless

he is told to do so by Dr. Al Shulz. He offers no further assistance. 1:00 pm A few hour later, Stan

Caterbone visits Dr. Al Shulz for his quarterly appointment. Immediately upon entering the appointment,

and before the plaintiff will speak any words, Dr. Al Shulz will contemporaneously accuse the plaintiff and


25

declare: “Stan, you are very sick. You are not well! You need to take additional medications”. The

recorded transcript will prove the horrid implications of these conversations.

February 20, 1998 The plaintiff is forced to vacate his position of Controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc.,

due to the purposeful and intentional infliction of mental duress, perpetrated as a direct reprisal against

the Plaintiff’s rightful pursuit of due process of the law concerning all issues contained herein.

April 21, 1998 The Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry will again illegally deny the Plaintiff

of his legitimate claim for Unemployment Compensation Benefits, which again is an act of reprisal

against his rightful pursuit of fair access to the law, and his disclosures of the incidents contained herein.

The Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry’s 1987 rulings against the Plaintiff have been also

proven to be in err, which conveniently and intentionally subjects the Plaintiff to financial hardship and

mental duress, all purposefully hindering the Plaintiff’s right to access the law. The record of the plaintiff’s

claim for Unemployment Compensation Benefits is corrupted.

Diary of Mental Duress Pflumm Contractors, Inc.,

I started to log incidents of mental duress in December of 1997 after the incidents became consistent

and demonstrated not be random acts of mere occurrences. This behavior and malicious treatment was

an extreme divergence from the previous 45 months of my tenure and a polarization of my relationships

with all employees involved, including Mr. David Pflumm.

Ms. Susan Bare (Office Manager, Reporting Directly To Me)

In December, her attitude became especially hostile toward me, upon many occasions challenging my

computer knowledge when in fact she has limited experience. She had continued to persist in wanting to

change procedures, which I had repeatedly told her that systems are reviewed at the end of the fiscal

year, and any necessary changes would only be made during the off-season, as in previous years. She

had continued to challenge my authority, which was out-of -character, and not consistent with her job

description. She had often become upset and snippy when I would not go out and get her lunch, which

was not in my job description.


26

Mr. James Leonards, (Asphalt Paving Supervisor)

In the week preceding Christmas vacation, Mr. Leonards had requested that I submit a form to Wholsen

Contractors, which was incidental to any contracts. The form requested banking accounts, which I had

refused to answer. I would not release the corporate confidential banking information to a General

Contractor of whom we were at credit risk for collecting payments for services rendered, not the other

way around. Mr. Leonards continued to harass me about the document, and kept waiving the document

in front of my face. He continued, and I told him to have Wholsen call me. I had counted five incidents

regarding this document, which I never submitted. This information was immaterial to any negotiations

with Wholsen, and was intended only as a means of mental duress.

Mr. Leonards had shown interest in learning estimating software on the computer. He persistently

requested the opportunity, and I had suggested that he evaluate competing software before any final

decisions were made. He had on his own, obtained a demonstration of software, which he evaluated. It

was not what we required, and before Christmas, I had procured another demonstration disc for his

evaluation. He promised to evaluate that software over the Christmas vacation. Mr. Leonards kept

giving me excuses, and was never evaluated., merely to inflict mental duress.

On many occasions Mr. Leonards insisted on challenging my computer knowledge with incidental

technical questions, knowing that I was becoming annoyed. Mr. Leonards only began working on a

computer at home, within the past several months.

On January 15th, I went out to start my car, and Mr. Leonards and Mr. Ralph Carruthers from the lobby

door, made gestures at me thinking that I was leaving, when in fact I was merely warming up my car.

When I returned to the lobby, Mr. Leonards and Mr. Carruthers had disappeared.

On or about February 24th, upon logging into my AOL account, a “Buddy List” message from Mr. James

Leonards appeared on my computer screen that said “Stan is that you?”. The only way that I am able to

receive “Buddy List” messages is to sign up for the service, of which I had never done, which means that

Mr. Leonards must have illegally accessed my account and signed my account up for the service. The

evening before, a neighbor saw me looking for my cats with a spot light, and yelled “Stan is that you?’.

This is certainly a clear example of mental duress, among other electronic privacy violations.

Mr. John Brown, (Truck Driver)


27

On January 9th, Mr. John Brown was receiving his pay check and made the following remark “ Stan,

why didn’t you go to Cancun with Dave, you look like one of those Mexican’s”.

LN Dockey (Office Assistant, part-time)

Consistently called my car phone upon leaving the office to ask where I was going, and when I was

coming back, which was none of her business. She reported to me, I did not report to her. She knew

that this annoyed me, and was out-of-character and inconsistent with prior behavior.

Mr. Brian Langsett (Subcontractor)

Mr. Brian Langsett continued to make calls to my home, and during the week of February 20th,

screamed and yelled into my voice mail, which resulted in my changing my line to a private phone line.

Mr. Langsett consistently left messages on my voice mail, knowing that I was not going to answer them

back.

Mr. Ralph Carruthers (General Manager)

On January 22nd, Mr. Ralph Carruthers entered my office and requested that I redo a pay application for

the Lancaster Township Park Avenue project that I had done. I informed him that I had nothing to do

with that pay application because I was on vacation. He stormed out of my office, mad that I wouldn’t

redo the pay application and telling me that I had done it. Immediately following his departure, Mr. David

Pflumm stormed into my office and got inches away from my face and said “Do you and Ralph have a

problem, what is your problem?” I nervously and quite upset said, “Dave, I didn’t prepare that pay

application, I was on vacation”. Mr. Pflumm replied, “Yes you did”. I immediately said, “ Dave, mental

duress is a serious matter, you don’t mess with someone’s mind, like that you just don’t play with

someone’s mind like this., I was on vacation” Mr. Pflumm went on to say that I did do the pay

application. I asked him “Do you have a problem with me? He replied no.

I later went to the file and retrieved the original pay application for Lancaster Township’s Park Avenue.

Mr. David Pflumm with his handwriting prepared it. I later showed it to him and he said nothing. THIS IS

MENTAL DURESS.


28

Mr. David Pflumm

In August of 1997, I was responsible for the formulation, presentation, and collection of a Change Order

for the removal of rock at the Cecil County Community College, which we subcontracted the work from

e.e. Murray Construction Company. We had negotiated a unit price per cubic yard of rock removed, and

we were required to document the measurements, which accounted for a billing of some $275,000 to e.e.

Murray.

I had spent several hundred hours on the project, most of which I had done at my office at home.

Through November, it became apparent that the e.e. Murray was trying to pass on their own problems

and mistakes with their contract with the College to us, in an effort to relieve themselves of the $275,000

contractual liability they had with Pflumm Contractors, Inc., This process was an enormous burden, given

the impact the loss would have to our financial, and especially considering that e.e. Murray had no legal

loophole to avoid payment to us, regardless of any dispute they had with the college. I had proven this

through thorough documentation and the specifics of our contractual arrangements.

My policy and the policy of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., up to this point had always been to take legal action

after all other efforts for collections and contract disputes have failed. I had demonstrated an outstanding

performance in reducing the amount of bad receivables, which had almost caused the company into

bankruptcy prior to my affiliation. More Mr. David Pflumm had always demonstrated a hard line stance in

all collection matters, even to the extreme of causing the dismissal of his own employee for failing to

reimburse the company for a $700 repair bill. Mr. David Pflumm was not known for his fairness or good

faith negotiating. His tendency was to inflate production figures, and was lack in leniency to anyone that

owed him money. This was clearly demonstrated in past contractual disputes with the Hershey Library,

Dutch Family Inn, Consolidated Construction, and various other small accounts. His policy was

consistent no matter what the amount of the payable. Mr. Pflumm was quick to take legal action in all

disputes as soon as negotiations proved fruitless.

As early as late October I had advised Mr. Pflumm that we were exhausting our efforts for collection of

the $275,000 and that e.e. Murray was not negotiating in good faith and was in my opinion engaging in

fraudulent tactics. This transaction was of even greater importance than any other bad receivable due to

the fact that a majority of the funds at risk were pure profits. As early as November, it was the advise of

our corporate attorney, Mr. Matt Samley of Xakellis, Reese and Pugh, that a civil law suit should be


29

immediately filed. I had Mr. Matt Samley detail all of the legal parameters of his legal opinion supporting

his contentions.

In November, I had informed Mr. David Pflumm that I personally removed myself form the dispute on the

grounds that e.e. Murray Construction Company was not acting in good faith, I had exhausted all

available resources and means of collecting the monies without a civil law suit being filed, and Mr. David

Pflumm refused to take legal action.

By my departure on February 20th, all efforts for collecting the $275,000 proved fruitless, and Mr. David

Pflumm continued his procrastination of filing a civil lawsuit. I am of the firm belief that the many of the

negotiations and situations surrounding the collection of payments from e.e. Murray was strategically

used as ploy to inflict mental duress for the following reasons:

1. I had exhausted most of my time during September, October, and November while also

managing my regular duties, and had requested a fee for the collection of funds that was

well beyond the scope of my duties.

2. e.e. Murray Construction Company had no legal foundation for not paying Pflumm

Contractors, Inc., regardless of whether e.e. Murray collected the funds from the Cecil County

Community College.

3. e.e Murray had collected enough funds from Cecil County Community College in January,

and still refused any payment to Pflumm Contractors, Inc.,

4. Mr. David Pflumm had exhibited and demonstrated an extreme sense of leniency toward filing

a civil lawsuit that was unprecedented during my tenure and in the history of the company.

5. Over half of the $275,000 was cash for the company.

6. I allege that during the month of February, communications were used to deceive the true

nature of the situation.

7. Mr. Pflumm had always taken my advice on such matters during my tenure.

8. Lastly, the only reasonable explanation for not filing a civil complaint is that the situation was

not being truly disclosed by Mr. David Pflumm and e.e. Murray and that a lawsuit would

become public record and has adverse and irrevocable damages to e.e. Murray Construction

Company.


30

In late January Mr. David Pflumm laid a large envelope addressed to his home on my desk. Inside was a

letter addressed to me from Airways Charter Service, including a brochure depicting a plane, identical to

that which was illegally repossessed from me in 1987. This was clearly a demonstrated tactic for mental

duress. In the history of my tenure, we have never discussed or had any remote need for such a service,

and more importantly, the package was addressed to Mr. David Pflumm’s home.

On week of February 20th, Mr. David Pflumm had provided me with documentation that required my

signature from Town & Country Leasing for my automobile that that had I signed would have given the

leasing company the right to repossess the automobile at any given time while providing me with no legal

recourse to prevent such repossession. Mr. Pflumm had agreed to personally guarantee the payments

for the automobile for the duration of the lease, under any and all circumstances. He has breached his

agreement.

During the weeks preceding my departure, in the course of my travels, I had passed many employees on

many different occasions during the course of the day. On every occasion, not one employee would

acknowledge me with a gesture or waive.

During my tenure at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., not only did I resurrect the company from near

bankruptcy, and restore the company to the best financial condition it has ever experienced, even as

important was the management policies that I had implemented that had for the first time given the

employees fair and equitable place of employment. And their gratitude was often displayed and

demonstrated toward me. The behavior of the company, as a whole, was drastically out of character and

malicious, which had resulted in a hostile environment directly threatening my mental welfare. There is

not a reason in the world where I should have been so maliciously treated. The pain and suffering was

so great, that I specifically sought the advice and help of Fr. Edward Lavelle on January 14th, in the

Office of the Bishop.

Any further detail to this document would greatly compromise my rights for any future litigation, which

may or may not transpire.

I Attest,

Stanley J. Caterbone


31

August 2001 – AIM Management Company begins to systematically sabotage my business with al l of the

Wholesale Representatives and Advanced Media Group, which resulted in the loss of approximately $50,000 per

year of revenues. This was is the beginning of the loss of my earning capacity to present.

2002 to 2004 – Day trading business was again sabotaged by malicious mirror trading of my stock portfolio

resulting in the loss of profitability on my trading transactions. Persons and or organizations would systematically

trade against me while also employing techniques of psychological tactics to distract me from concentrating on my

own instinctive nature and financial analysis required for profitability.

Dec 16, 2004 Plaintiff sends a complaint to Agent Sarsfield of the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s

Office in Pittsburg regarding illicit telephone activities:

December 15, 2004

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Office of Attorney of General

Bureau of Consumer Protection

Pittsburgh Regional Office

6th Floor, Manor Building

Pittsburgh, PA 15129

Attn: Ms. Shannon J. Sarsfield

Ref: Verizon Customer Relations, C-006142-2004

Dear Ms. Sarsfield:

I appreciate your review of the aforementioned file. I was also in receipt of the November 19, 2004

response of the complaint from Verizon. For the record, I have made several previous attempts prior to

the July 28th request to be place on their Do Not Call list. I had made several calls in the previous

months, and the calls did not stop. My telephone has been used as a means of harassment and

intimidation, with my calls often being intercepted, misdirected, or impersonated. And often calls from

“Out of Area” made several times a day, with no answer. If you were to do an audit of my calls (in/out)

over the last several years, you would reveal the nature of these activities.

Dec 16, 2004 Plaintiff sends a complaint to Agent Sarsfield of the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s

Office in Pittsburg regarding illicit telephone activities:


32

December 15, 2004


Office of Attorney of General

Bureau of Consumer Protection

Pittsburgh Regional Office

6th Floor, Manor Building

Pittsburgh, PA 15129

Attn: Ms. Shannon J. Sarsfield

Ref: Verizon Customer Relations, C-006142-2004

Dear Ms. Sarsfield:

I appreciate your review of the aforementioned file. I was also in receipt of the November 19, 2004

response of the complaint from Verizon. For the record, I have made several previous attempts prior to

the July 28th request to be place on their Do Not Call list. I had made several calls in the previous

months, and the calls did not stop. My telephone has been used as a means of harassment and

intimidation, with my calls often being intercepted, misdirected, or impersonated. And often calls from

“Out of Area” made several times a day, with no answer. If you were to do an audit of my calls (in/out)

over the last several years, you would reveal the nature of these activities.

Dec 16, 2004 Approx 1:00 pm Plaintiff meets with Michael Landis, County Detective for Lancaster

County, in his office at the Lancaster Courthouse to discuss J. Karpathious and death threats and the

Southern Regional Police Department. Plaintiff sends email to Michael Landis and a copy of the 1998

Affidavit in the email. Supreme Court announces plans to review Lambert Appeal the next day.

Dear Mr. Landis,

Thank you for taking the time to meet with me yesterday. I appreciate your time. I understand your

frustration in trying to understand the circumstances regarding my situation. I have enclosed a document,

which I authored in 1998 to help you. Also, if you could, maybe you could help to facilitate my application

for food stamps with the County Assistance Office. I would appreciate it.

Feb 18, 2005 - Plaintiff sends the following letter to the Chief of Police of the Southern Regional Police

Department:


33

February 18, 2005

Chief John A. Fiorill

Southern Regional Police Department

3284 Main Street

P.O. Box 254

Conestoga, PA 17516

Dear Chief Fiorill:

I am very disappointed in the way that our meeting had ended. I will be filing complaints With the

appropriate authorities concerning the threats and abuse by Officer Busser. Remember you had

requested that meeting. And as you stated, “I do not believe anything that you say”, well Sir, that is

certainly your choice, however I have never provided anything but the truth to you or any member of your

department. The burden of proof to my allegations falls within your jurisdiction. If you are telling me that I

have to prove every allegation when I report a crime, I just don’t know how that is possible. But you are

the Chief of the department, so I guess I will have to protect my person and property in any manner that

deems appropriate. I apologize for becoming loud and frustrated, however when you tell me that I am

lying and I am most certainly telling the truth; and then you and Mr. Busser yell that I am nuts and to “get

out of here”; and that no one will respond to any of my calls to your office, well we have a very serious

problem. You both have challenged my integrity, my truthfulness, credibility, and my sanity. And Mr

Busser pulling out his night stick and holding it up to hit me, that is more than enough for me.

I get the picture loud and clear. I hope that you do as well.

Cc: Donald Totaro, Lancaster County District Attorney

Feb 19, 2005 Plaintiff files the following complaint with the The Internet Fraud Complaint Center (IFCC)

after the incident of Kerry Egan calling 911 to file a false report of plaintiff sending an email stating to kill

himself.

Saturday, February 19, 2005

The Internet Fraud Complaint Center (IFCC) is a partnership between the Federal Bureau of

Investigation (FBI) and the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).

February 19, 2005 7:26 am


34

At approximately 5:00 am this morning the Conestoga Police entered my home and accused me of

sending an email to Kerry Egan threatening to kill myself. The officer verbally and physically abused me

because I did not know what he was talking about and he kept interrogating me and handcuffed me

because I said that I was not on the internet after 10:00 pm on February 18, the evening before. The

officer told me that I sent an email to Kerry Egan and she called 911 at approximately 5:00 am this

morning. I told the officer that I did I fell asleep at approximately 1:00 am and did not awake until the

officer arrived at my house. The officer was quite abusive and tried to accuse me of lunging at him, when

in fact he was throwing me around. Pam Pflumm, who previously filed trespass charges against me, and

whom I was to have no contact with, illegally entered my home with the officer, via a key which I had kept

on the deck. Before they entered my home, I called 911 and requested that the Pennsylvania State

Police come to my aid because of the verbal and physical threats that I received earlier in the day from

Officer Busser and Chief of Police Fiorill of the Southern Regional Police Department. After they had left,

I took a shower and almost collapsed from exhaustion and trauma. I got dressed and went to the

emergency room of Regional Hospital, former Saint Joseph Hospital. Dr. Laird attended to my concerns.

Feb 20, 2005 Plaintiff calls Southern Regional Police Department and Humane League to file formal

complaint of Cruelty to Animals. Both refused to investigate or file any reports. Complaint phoned in to

the Humane League on Feb 20, 2005 As described to a Letter To The Editor, Gil Smart While I was

away for a family emergency, I had someone let my two cats out after being inside for a few days, which

I have always done in the past. I returned after being in South Florida for one week. Upon driving toward

my driveway, my one cat was anxiously awaiting my arrival. However, my second cat was not there. This

was an immediate cause for concern, since being mother and son; they had always stuck together. After

a few days I knew that my cat was either abducted or was harmed. No way would he be around and not

come home. The other evening I went over to my suspect neighbors home, which I know often has been

mischievous toward my property in the past, and asked him if he saw my cat. He went on to tell me how

big my cat is and how he is the "king of the neighborhood". I found this conversation to be typical bull....

He said "don't worry it will show up soon!" Last evening I found my dead cat lying by my pond with a

possum chewing on its ear. I examined the body and found that its neck had been broken with no other

signs of any other wounds. I called the Humane Shelter and talked to a Cruelty Officer who said" There

is nothing we can do if you did not see anyone physically harm the animal” Is this the way it is? You have

to prove a crime before they will investigate? Sounds a little backwards to me, but then again I often

forget where I am at.


35

Feb 21, 2005 Plaintiff sends letter to Fulton Bank regarding the death of Thomas Caterbone and the

alleged indiscretions and illegalities of the activities of Fulton Bank.

Monday, February 21, 2005

Project Hope

Mr. Scott Smith

Fulton Financial Corporation

One Penn Square

P.O. Box 4887

Lancaster, PA 17604

Dear Mr. Smith:

The reason I had called you on Friday morning was to discuss an outstanding issue with you. I am not

threatening you or coming to you as an adversary, but rather just trying to understand how your

institution can be so cold and rude to my family. On Thursday I visited the Manor Branch to discuss the

account for Tom's Project Hope, our nonprofit foundation that advocates awareness for suicide

prevention, with a focus for teenagers. Of course this foundation was founded after the suicide of my

youngest brother, Tom, in 1996. Well, I never had so much trouble trying to gain access to our account's

statements than I did on that day. All that I heard was how much I would have to pay to get copies of the

statements. Which in itself is a little disheartening, considering we are a non-profit giving something back

to the community. We are a major donor for CONTACT Lancaster. And it is this attitude that inspired me

to address the very reason Tom's Project Hope was unfortunately founded. I had asked the Customer

Service person what would happen if I made an attempt to deposit a check in an account that did not

have funds available at that time. She said "we have to give you the choice to deposit the check or wait

until there are funds". I said are you sure, she said "oh yes, you have the choice to make the deposit or

not". I said that is what I thought was the policy or rule. In 1996 my brother, Tom, had his accounts with

your bank. He was given a check in the amount of approximately $60,000 by an account from Ms. John

Depatto.

Forgive me but I do not have the energy to retrieve all of the details at this time. My brother went to the

Manor Branch to deposit that check, and was refused on at least 3 occasions from making that deposit. I

know this because he was calling me asking for advise and help. I remember telling him to seek legal

counsel because this was not right. Your tellers refused to take the check for deposit because there were


36

no funds available. I kept telling him that this was wrong and that he should make the deposit incase

funds became available the check would be honored. But your tellers kept refusing to make that deposit.

I then went on to learn that funds did become available and were paid to other entities that had NSF

checks waiting for funds, which would have been behind my brothers check had your tellers accepted

that deposit. If you carefully review the financial problems my brother encountered prior to his death, you

would see that this was the one transaction that started a spiral of events that caused him a great

amount of stress and duress. And I know this because I was trying to help him. I eventually took him to

the emergency room of St. Joseph Hospital just 4 days prior to his death.

Now, Sir, you tell me how you would feel if you were in my position, and what would you want to happen.

I have kept this to myself for far too long, and since I have had my own problems with your institution in a

similar way back in 1987. I would like to understand why we are treated like this, and ask that these

matters be addressed. Put yourself in my position, would you want anything less?

Feb 22, 2005 Plaintiff sends email to Lancaster District Attorney Donald Totaro after Supreme Court

announces the Supreme Court of the United States is reviewing Lambert Case, one day after Plaintiff

reviews affidavit for the first time in 7 years.

Dear Don:

Just so there are no misunderstandings, I have never had, nor do I have now, any information regarding

the Lambert proceedings. I have never spoken to anyone concerning the same. I am very suspect as to

the timing of this announcement and find it very disturbing given the document that I had innocently

resurrected after 8 years. My only intent in writing that document was to find resolve for my own tragic

situation. I believe a jury trial would have been the only fair way for an equitable resolution to this case.

Had that occurred in the beginning, I don't believe we would be confronting this issue today. I meant no

disrespect toward your office or that of the state. As far as the police, it is the same, except that I was

very angered at the few that have treated me with such malice, which is in no way a condemnation for

the men in blue. I was literally fighting for my life, and still continue to this day.

Feb 26, 2005 Plaintiff sends letter to President Bush and White House staff addressing concerns

regarding National Security Issues and this case and receives positive signal to proceed to court. Iraq

National Security

To: President George W. Bush


37

From: Mr. Stan Caterbone <[email protected]>

Subject: Write a Supporting Comment on National Security (Iraq)

Dear President Bush:

I need to know if any information contained herein compromises the security of the United States of

America. I have been getting mixed signals as to this question, and my life has been constantly

threatened because of this document. I would submit to a polygraph to verify the credibility of any of the

facts contained in this document. I was the sole author of this writing back in 1998. If you believe that this

document does threaten our National Security, I would like to personally deliver the accompanying

information assets to yourself or the National Security Agency upon request. If you believe that this

document does not compromise the National Security in any manner, then I would ask that you uphold

my civil liberties in continuing my efforts to adjucate these matters and find an opportunity for remedy in

the appropriate court of law.

March 10, 2005 – Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., illegally removes my privileges to post on the Lancaster

Online Chat Board.

March 14, 2005 Plaintiff files complaint to the American Civil Liberties Union of Philadelphia, PA after the

Intake Director directed plaintiff in filing protocols.

March 14, 2005

American Civil Liberties Union Of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, PA

[email protected]

Re: Complaint

I have had many persons levy attacks and harassment upon me with explicit statements defaming my

character and slandering me with such statements as calling me "insane, crazy and nuts". I have been

abused, both emotionally and physically, which are a matter of record, by the Southern Regional Police

Department, formally the Conestoga Police Department. I have had several fabrications and false reports

concerning alleged suicide attempts, all of which have been proved to be total lies. There has been total

disregard for my civil liberties and numerous violations of my civil rights. All of these incidents are

intended to provoke and illicit the very same behavior they accuse me of; that of being mentally unstable.


38

The reason for this is simple, to discredit my allegations and to prevent me from taking legal action and

to block access of due process against the private and public entities of the County of Lancaster, and the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. These attacks, harassment, and intimidation began in June of 1987

and continue today. In the last several weeks, in the matter of 4 days, I was detained and abused by

Police in the middle of the night on 2 different occasions. At 4:00 am one morning a person called 911

and reported that I had emailed a message threatening to commit suicide, proven to be a lie. I had a

Police Officer raised his nightstick and threaten to hit me while he was in a violent rage, only to have

another officer take step in and disarm him. I have had the Police literally break into my home, because I

would not open the door, for fear of my safety after being abused the previous day. The officer

handcuffed me and shoved me around because I would not admit to wanting to kill myself. In the last

several weeks I have had no less than 6 persons attack my mental stability and in an effort to break me

emotionally. In 1987 I had made public allegations of fraud against a Defense Contractor, International

Signal& Control (I was a shareholder), after a meeting in which they wanted me to finance some

questionable activities. From that meeting forward, these illicit and malicious acts have been occurring

quite frequently. It cost me money, financial opportunity, friends, time; and everything imaginable except

my life. And there was at least one attempt on that. In 1987 ISC was in the midst of a multi-million dollar

merger with the British Defense Contractor, Ferranti International. My allegations caused grave

consequences to that deal. Four years later executives of ISC were indicted for the "largest fraud in U.S.

History"; ($1 Billion dollars), and for exporting arms to Iraq by way of South Africa. In 1987, when I made

these allegations, I was making the first digital movie; ironically, I received the original patent research

materials days after that meeting with ISC, from a prominent patent law firm in Philadelphia. I have been

Arrested at least on 6 occasions, and the most outlandish, for stealing my own files from my own office. I

have spent 6 days in prison. I have been taken to the Hospital on 2 occasions, and have been detained

by police on several other occasions for persons making false claims that I threatened to commit suicide.

I have never been convicted of any crime, and all charges are conveniently discharged before any court

proceedings. All charges of suicide have been proven to be false allegations and fraudulent false reports.

In the last week, I had obtained my medical records from the Regional Medical Center, while I was

maliciously and fraudulently admitted there after my arrest in 1987, and there are 3 reports from 3

different psychiatrists which all reveal that there was never any attempt by anyone in the Hospital

administration or medical staff to validate any of my statements; which in and of themselves were used to

indict me and support the diagnosis of manic depression. Of, course, all of my statements were true,

which all are methodically proven in the following supporting documents. I have had my airplane, loaded

with all of my files, repossessed in the middle of the night by the Common National Bank of Lancaster

(Mellon), before any payments were due. This happened immediately after my meeting with International


39

Signal & Control, in 1987. I was trying to find safe haven in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, where we were

making a movie. Tony Bongiovi, of Power Station Studio in New York, had solicited me to help him

produce the 1st Digital Movie, again in 1987.I have been precluded from any seeking any kind of remedy

in the courts due to the sensitive nature and involvement of National Security issues. It has been

reported that the CIA and National Security Agency were all involved in covert and possibly rogue

activities with ISC and the export of arms to Iraq (Cluster Bombs). This was one of the questions that

Robert Gates had to answer in his Confirmation Hearings for Director of the CIA in 1990 by the Chairman

of the Committee (I have the CNN video). There was also a "Presidential Finding" that was said to be

filed by then President George H. Bush regarding the same. The following are supporting documents and

complaints that I filed and are forwarding to you:

March 23, 2005 – Letter to Phi Wenger, President of Fulton Bank;

Email to Phillip Wenger

President of Fulton Bank

Lancaster, PA

Phil:

For the Record-

1. The Project Hope Account; Project Hope was founded in 1996 with it's mission stated in its non-

profit organization charter to raise funds for the intention of contributing to the education and

awareness of mental illness and suicide prevention. Since it's inception, I was the sole

administrator of all monies that were dispersed and donated to various local organizations to

further that cause. These relationships included; The Lancaster County Mental Health Alliance,

The Schreiber Pediatric Center, Contact Lancaster. I also was responsible for the local production

of the video "Numbers Don't Lie" (educational video for teenage suicide prevention) and

distributing that video to a host of local schools, churches, and faith based organizations. Since

about 2001, Project Hope has not made any contributions from it's account, while at the same

time continuing to raise funds from the annual golf tournament. In excess of $9,000 was

accumulated. Every year I questioned Phil and Mike about the contributions and what

organization they were going to give the money to. In December of 2004, Lois Gascho, Executive

Director of Contact Lancaster, personally called me asking if we could help her with some money.

At that time, her affiliation with the League of Churches had been terminated and Contact

Lancaster was without funding, and the 24/7 Suicide Hotline for Lancaster was at risk of being

shut down. I told her I would contact my brothers and get her some help. There was an article in


40

the Lancaster Newspapers about the funding problems and I emailed Mike, Phil, and Jimmy

Karpathious the article and message that Lois called me asking for help. Nothing was done. I kept

trying to tell them that they were not operating the Project within IRS guidelines, and their non-

profit tax-exempt status was in jeopardy for not distributing the monies accumulated, as required

in the IRS regulations concerning the same. When I was down at Mike's last month, I found the

account statements for Project Hope and being that I am a Signatory on the account, took the

entire file with me and started to disperse the monies. I made one check out to Lancaster Contact

for $2500. When I met with Lois Gascho of Contact Lancaster to give her the check, she wanted

to give me a tour of the facility where the suicide hotline operates. While visiting, she was saying

how difficult it is to find volunteers to staff the hotline. I suggested that I could design systems,

with technology, that could allow volunteers to staff the hotline while working from home. This

would help Contact Lancaster a great deal in attracting more volunteers to help staff the hotline.

Remember, the hotline is located downtown, and volunteers must come and go during all hours

of the night to staff the hotline. I designed a conceptual system and called D&E Communications

to provide a proposal to provide the required software and telecommunications technology to

build the system. I expect to receive that proposal on Friday. I will be making a legal challenge to

gain control of that account with the Internal Revenue Service and the Tax-Exempt status of the

Project.

2. Fulton Account – When my Mom got sick while in Florida, it was determined, by her, that she

could not live alone anymore. Our house at 1250 Fremont Street was in dire need of painting and

other maintenance for sometime. I told my mother that I was going to do these tasks now, incase

we have to sell the house. They house is 2 stories, which is more difficult for my mother to live in.

In January I decided that I would make sure the house is ready to put on the market by

springtime, and if we decide not to have to sell the house, it would be already done and could be

sold at anytime without any repairs needed. At the same time, I setup the Fulton Account with

online banking so that I could manage my mother’s bills, and pay them from Lancaster without

having her try to take care of this herself. My mother memory has been a deteriorating problem

since the fall of last year. To give you an example, while in Florida last month, I was taking my

mother out for breakfast, we were driving around looking for a restaurant, and she looked at me in

the car and asked if we had eaten yet! She agreed that it would be best that I manage her bills,

hence the Power of Attorney for the Fulton Account and online banking. The $2,000 transfer was

for the renovations at 1250 Fremont that I am currently doing. I will now fund that project myself,


41

because I do not want to be bothered with this at a later time. So, there you have the truth about

the accounts. So be it.

May 2, 2005 Plaintiff files a complaint with Capital Blue Cross

May 2, 2005

Capitol Blue Cross

Adult Basic Program

P.O. Box 777014

Harrisburg, PA 17177-7014

Re: Policy H200460959 & Policy Laps

As per my meeting in with your customer service representative on Friday, April 29th, at your home office

in Harrisburg, this is a letter of appeal for the lapsed policy and also a letter containing the complaints

concerning the charges from the Lancaster Regional Medical Center and Dr. Laird, the attending

emergency room physician, on February 19th, 2005, as per the request of the customer service

representative.

1) As per the lapse in policy, I was told by Kay Richmond, of Cash Processing Services (717-541-

7262) on several phone calls that there was a 30-day grace period. She had told me that

“although it is not stated, there is a 30 day grace period for your policy”. I had called because my

mail has been tampered with, and I questioned the rule of no grace period, and the policy being

dependant on Blue Cross receiving my payments via the mail. If this person who misrepresented

herself to me as a representative of your company was not who she said she was, this would

certainly not be the first time. Enclosed you will find a complaint that I filed with the Agent

Shannon J. Sarsfield, of the Pittsburg Regional Office of the PA Attorney General. In that

complaint I stated, “My telephone has been used as a means of harassment and intimidation,

with my calls often being intercepted, misdirected, or impersonated”. See the enclosed copy of

the complaint.

2) As per my reason to visit your home office on April 29th, to discuss the charges from the

emergency room visit on February 19th, I have enclosed all relevant documents for your use in

determining the validity of the charges from both Regional Medical Hospital and the emergency

room physician, Dr. Laird. Please direct any and all communications to me at the above address

or [email protected], or phone 717-380- 5903.


42

June 2, 2005


Judicial Conduct Board

RE: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Stanley J. Caterbone

District Court 02-2-06

Docket Number NT: 0000132-05

Commonwealth Court of Common Please

Appeal Docket No. CP-36-SA-00000141-2005

Explanation of Complaint

1. Previous to hearing, I entered the offices of the District Magistrate and requested a meeting with

him to review the rules for procedure for his courtroom. He belligerently yelled at me and told me

that “I will determine who is guilty in this case” and threw me out of his office. 2. I immediately

contracted the Lancaster County Court Reporters (LCCR) service to record the hearing.

2. I requested and paid a service fee to have 4 witnesses subpoenaed for my defense. Prior to the

start of the hearing, the District Magistrate never gave me an opportunity to explain the reason for

calling my witnesses, and collectively dismissed all of my witness without an opportunity for me to

explain how they were involved with this case. During the brief discussion that was on the record,

the District Magistrate intimidated and threatened me with court sanctions when I tried to explain

how the witnesses did have personal knowledge regarding the case. Two of the witnesses were

officers of Lancaster County and were called by me to investigate a crime, in which both refused.

3. At the conclusion of the hearing the District Magistrate threatened me with offensive language

again with court sanctions for merely trying to understand why he was violating the rules of

conduct and the rules of procedure for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

4. A few days after the conclusion of the hearing, I entered the offices of the District Magistrate to

pay for the fines and penalties sanctioned by the court. I first, asked whether I would have to pay

before I entered my appeal to the verdict. They refused to provide any explanation, other than

you will have to get an attorney, we cannot answer that question. I immediately paid the fines

knowing that I would appeal the case.


43

5. After receiving the transcript for the LCCR, I found a blatant lie in the transcript. When asked

whether a witness had personal knowledge about the case, the transcript reads “NO”. Now before

I subpoenaed my witnesses, I reviewed the rules of procedure and was knowledgeable of the

rules for personal knowledge of a witness, and would not have answered “no” to that question

because they did have personal knowledge.

6. The District Magistrate was intimidating me and obstructing justice by trying to deter me from

filing CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-2288 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN

DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, which I filed on May 16, 2005. The case was filed with a Motion

to Seal on the same day.

PRIVATE

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

Docket Number:

The acts committed by the accused were: (Set forth a summary of the facts sufficient to advise the

defendant of the nature of the offense charged. Activation to the statute allegedly violated, without more,

is not sufficient. In a summary case, you must cite the specific section and subsection of the statute

ordinance allegedly violated.

Defendant did knowingly and willingly block plaintiffs access to the door to exit store in an attempt to

intimidate and harass, and after plaintiff tried to avoid the defendant and exit the doorway, defendant did

engage in an illegal sexual act by grabbing and squeezing the defendants buttocks with an inappropriate

gesture with the defendants finger while squeezing. This lude act was in the strictest violation of

Pennsylvania statutes concerning sexual harassment. Witnesses were present both behind the checkout

counter and waiting in line at the checkout counter. Plaintiff requests the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

to prosecute the defendant to the fullest extent of the law. All of which were against the peace and

dignity of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and contrary to the Act of Assembly, or in violation of and

(Subsection) (Section) of the (PA Statute). I ask that process be issued and that the defendant be

required to answer the charges I have made.


44

I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or

information and belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes

Code (18 Pa.C.S. § 4904) relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.

June 11, 2005

Defendant did knowingly and willingly block plaintiff’s access to the door to exit store in an attempt to

intimidate and harass, and after plaintiff tried to avoid the defendant and exit the doorway, defendant did

engage in an illegal sexual act by grabbing and squeezing the defendant’s buttocks with an inappropriate

gesture with the defendants finger while squeezing. This lude act was in the strictest violation of

Pennsylvania statutes concerning sexual harassment. Witnesses were present both behind the

check*out counter and waiting in line at the checkout counter. Plaintiff requests the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania to prosecute the defendant to the fullest extent of the law. Verify that the facts set forth in

this complaint are true and correct to the Recent Police Reports & Status of Ongoing Investigations

1. Break-In reported on June 12, 2005: As reported to the officer, “Adams”? who came to take my

report, I left my home at approximately 2:30pm, with all doors locked. At approximately 9:15pm, I

entered through my garage door and found my back door wide open. I also reported a Honda file

missing, which I have since located.

2. I am requesting the status of the complaint that I reported to Officer Berger on June 10

concerning the sexual harassment by Mr. Thomas Grassel on the same date.

3. During my visit by the officer on June 12, I again asked if anyone in the department had

questioned Mr. David Pflumm regarding access to my home. As I have stated in just about every

complaint about a break-in over the past six months, On Thanksgiving day, 2004, Mr. David

Pflumm, his son Keagan, and daughter Lizzy, approached my home. I wanted NO personal

contact with them, and made sure my doors were closed and locked. After several minutes of

knocking on my back door, I went down to the basement hoping they would leave. They instead

went to my front door and basement door and kept knocking. I was located in the rear of my

basement, waiting for them to leave. Suddenly, Lizzy and Keagan appeared in my basement

asking why I did not answer the door. I quickly asked them how they got into my house. First they

said the door was opened, and then they said Keagan used a credit card to open my back door.

They said Dave was upstairs in my kitchen. We walked upstairs and I quickly asked Dave how

they got into my house, he responded, “We have lots of keys”. Now with all of the reports of

people breaking into my house, and the fact that I first reported the above event to Officer Berger


45

in December with the report of my missing remote control, I will again ask you why your

department refused to question the Pflumm’s regarding keys to my house?

4. During my interview last evening I showed the officer the letter from Mr. David Pflumm dated

June 2, 2005, which was served to me by a Pennsylvania Constable from District Justice Leo

Eckert’s office at approximately 9:30 am on June 10th on Stone Hill road in front of my mailbox.

The officer said, “We have a copy of that letter, and are aware of that”. I requested the officer to

take the letter and my response, sent via facsimile to Pflumm Contractors on June 10th, to you.

The officer refused to take the letter. I asked him to take my statement regarding the same, and

he refused. I asked him why he would not take my statement, if you have a copy of the complaint

from Mr. David Pflumm? He said, “I am going home”. I called him corrupt and said that the whole

department was corrupt. I attest to the above statements as the truth and request a copy of all of

my complaints, reports, and calls to your department, as defined and authorized under the

Freedom Of Information Act, and according to the laws governing the same by the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the federal rules governing the same.

Friday, July 1, 2005 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM: Stan Caterbone files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection in

the U.S. Eastern District Bankruptcy Court in Reading, PA at the Clerk of Courts, pays fee 255.00.

July 5, 2005 - Advanced Media Group issues a stock certificate to Sheryl Crow for a donation to the

Scout’s Trail charity fund; which was to be build in Kennett, MO beside the Sheryl Crow Aquatic Center.

The stock certificate is being held my the Kennett MO Chamber of Commerce.

July 17, 2005 – Posted message on the Sheryl Crow Fan Forum


registered: 4/19/2005 00:00

posts: 5

A new business model? This is a digital revolution. The music industry and consumers are experiencing

a conversion from physical mediums (cd's, videos, dvd's) to electronic files stored in cyberspace and on

mp3 players. Musicians and Artists are facing a legal dilemma in light of the preceding -How to protect

ownership, intellectual property rights, and most importantly royalties from their music. Look at the

statistics. CD sales and revenues are going down. Who needs to own a CD collection when you can pay

Rhapsody $10.00 a month fora 1 million song catalogue with digital quality, accessible 24/7? In addition,

you have the capability to port any song or albumto your mp3 player at half the cost of a CD.

Convergence of mediums is what is driving the partnership between Dell and Sheryl Crow. They are


46

leading the curve with this new technology for home entertainment. And it is not just about music. Sheryl

and Dell are pioneering a new approach at formulating a new business model that helps her

contemporaries meet the challenges facing the music industry at large. The musicians continue to enjoy

making more music, in light of the fact that they have been short changed during this process. When was

the last time you saw an artist go on strike? And what perfect timing to introduce a new album and tour.

I suspect it was all by design by professionals that understand thier markets, thier consumers, and thier

respective products. Give it a chance to play out before passing judgement.

posted: 7/17/2005 10:09

September 30, 2005 Yarnell - Security system malfunction garage door not on line <end>

October 01, 2005 Yarnell Calls 2 times Woke and found 2 calls from Yarnell Security <end>

October 02, 2005 Yarnell Security Dispatcher said someone entered house, aborted alarm at 9:21am

and changed the Master Code. Said she would reset. Code changed from 4115 to 2115. I told her she

had a security breach. Mr. Yarnell called me back and told me to stop calling his office.

October 04, 2005 Judge Mary McLaughlin Resubmit original complaint of 1998 affidavit via fax <end>

October 05, 2005 AB UNITED STATES TRUSTEE'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

THE DEBTOR'S BANKRUPTCY CASE SHOULD NOT BE REINSTATED On September 21, 2005, this

Court entered an Order to Show Cause why, in light of and Brief, his ...

October 05, 2005 - Comcast Cable

October 06, 2005 - Superior Court of California Filing Filed petitions for estate, and cause of death.

October 06, 2005- East Lampeter Police Arrest

Filed with California Superior Court for Sammy's Petitions via Willow Street Post Office. Then headed to

Cingular on Lincoln Hwy East, stopped for lunch at Brasserie. Girl jumped in front of me going in, Sheryl

Crow look alike. 2 girls, noticed SU, with convers...

October 07, 2005 Paid Conestoga Police Speeding Fine From Sunday


47

October 07, 2005 District Justice Savage see 1987 <end>

October 10, 2005 Patio Table Smashed

October 10, 2005 Southern Regional Police Visit Chief Fiorill responds and takes report - said he would

send assignment number for insurance.

October 11, 2005 AB Order

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYL.VANIA

IN THE MATTER OF: STANLEYJ. CATERBONE, Report to Harleysville A. Mazzuchi CIVIL ACTION NO.

05-3689 BKY. NO.

October 13, 2005 Cingular 4 Customer Service Reps will provide an audit within 7 days.

October 14, 2005 Superior Court of CA call Ann, wanted to know what to do with docs about Sammy.

Never called back. Left 2 messages.

October 17, 2005 Harleysville Insurance Letter Still under investigation, reason for case not closed when

due.

October 18, 2005 – Sovereign Bank would not open DIP Account. Kept giving me a hard time.

October 19, 2005 Hugh Ward, Dept of Justice Do not need DIP account, and do not have to submit

anymore docs for first meeting. Instructions will follow.

October 20, 2005 forum post would not give me a private meeting. told 3 people in lobby. <end>

October 22, 2005 East Lampeter Citations Docket No. CR-408-05 OTN- L260045-2 Hearing Nov 17,

3:00pm

October 28, 2005 Meeting with Judge Mary McLaughlin met with her, and at least 4 staffers <end>

November 01, 2005 - District Justice Savage Meeting


48

Requested a change of venue. DJ Williams? told me to go to County Court House to the Court

Administrator and get Change of Venue

November 01, 2005 Lancaster County Court Administrator Will change to another District Justice. Cited

the Affidavit and 1987 abuse in Giest Road during arrest by MT Police, Horton and Reese.

November 04, 2005 called Hugh Ward about appointment Submittals before meeting. Resend original

submittals. 48 hour notice to reschedule. was not in, left message to call if we needed to meet, told him

by back was bad and not able to drive, reschedule for mon or tue.

November 05, 2005 Called Mastropietro and Dr Pool called for appt - both said to go to emergency room

November 06, 2005 Lancaster Regional Hospital Emergency Room too much pain. Went for pain pills.

Did not help

November 14, 2005 Lancaster County Criminal Prothonotary Office 2 documents were not served

including the notice for hearing and the notice regarding appeal decision. Clerks were not very helpful,

and kept giving excuses as to why I never received any notices. Always quick to take my mone for the 2

copies.

November 17, 2005 656-2191District Judge Ron Savage Court Hearing

November 21, 2005 Creditors Meeting Courtroom 1

November 22, 2005 Joss Package per Feb 05

November 29, 2005 Chapter 11 fees Paid fee schedule. Clerk provide details for Dec 15 creditors

meeting, along with mandatory requirements. Addendums and supplemental to schedules for creditors.

November 30, 2005 Charlie Smithgall visited with Dee, she explained the proposal for the Lancaster

Press Building and we discussed the skyline debate and project.

December 01, 2005 Reading Court Hearing


49

December 02, 2005 East Lampeter Addendum for Hearing East Lampeter Citation Addendum to notes:

1. After walking outside I tried to give my credit card to the officer to pay for my bar tab, officer

refused to take the credit card so I threw the credit card on the ground. I told the officer that the

Charges withdrawn - May or may not be reissued by Judge Ruetter. What a crazy discussion and

hearing. Judge gave me the finger in the end while pointing to PA on a piece of paper. I'll save the

specifics and details for myself on this one.

December 06, 2005 eBay account hacked 23 Ipod’s listed from my store from Beijing China

December 06, 2005 IFCC FBI I05120608348825 IFCC internet fraud account 05120608348825

December 07, 2005 - Dr. Black request for records

December 08, 2005 - IFCC FBI I05120804514805 I05120804514805 You are about to submit a

complaint with the IFCC. Please review your information prior to submission.

December 12, 2005 - CD/DVD Writer Hacking tried to restore system configuration - did not work tried to

install new cd/dvd writer - did not work said to reinstall operating system and reinstall all software was

able to write to 3 cd on Iomega drive before it was hacked early am; Comcast Cable again disconnected

service and internet service.

December 14, 2005 – Letter of Denial from the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency:

Pennsylvania Homeowners' Emergency

Housing Finance Agency Mortgage Assistance Loan Program

Pavements: 211 North Front Sheet, P.O. Box 15206

Harrisburg, PA 17105-5206

Correspondence: 211 North Front Street, P.O. Box 15530

Harrisburg, PA 171 05-5530

(717) 780-3940 1-800-342-2397 fax(717) 780-3995

ITY (717) 780-1869


50

STAN J CATERBONE

220 STONE HILL ROAD

CONESTOGA, PA. 17516

S.S. #: 200-46-6095

Your application for a HOMEOWNERS' EMERGENCY MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE LOAN has been

DENIED pursuant to Act 91 of 1983,35 P.S. Section 1680,401-C et seq. and/o-r Agency Guidelines 12

PA Code Sect~on3 1.201 et seq. for the following reasons:

1. No reasonable prospect of applicant resuming full mortgage payments within twenty-four (24)

months and paying mortgage(s) by maturity based on: Applicant's income has been insufficient to

maintain mortgage for the past two (2) years. Total monthly expenses: $3268. 2002 net monthly

income: loss, 2003: 0,2004: extension.

2. No reasonable prospect of applicant resuming full mortgage payments within twenty-four (24)

months and paying mortgage@) by maturity based on: Applicant is financially overextended

based upon income history.

3. Property securing mortgage is not a one-or-two family owner occupied residence based on: The

secured property is used primarily for commercial or business purposes. Per applicant, ~ ~ 65%

of secured property is used for business.

4. Applicant is not suffering financial hardship due to circumstances beyond applicant's control

based on: Applicant has asset(s) which could have been liquidated to cure delinquency – Per

applicant, has stocks and/lor bonds in business valued at $4 million.

You may be entitled to an appeal hearing if you disagree with our decision. Requests for a hearing

must be made in writing and must be submitted to the Agency within 15 days after the postmark date

of this letter. Verbal requests are not acceptable. The hearing may be conducted by telephone

conference call therefore you must include your telephone number. You also have a right to an in-

person hearing at the Agency's office in Harrisburg if you so desire. Requests for hearings must state

the reason(s) that a hearing is requested and must be sent first class, registered or certified mail to:

Chief Counsel - HEMAP Hearing Request, PHFAIHEMAP, 21 1 North Front Street, P.O. Box 15628,

Harrisburg, PA, 17105-5628.

The hearing request may also be faxed to the attention of Chief Counsel - Hearing Request at 717-780-

4031. The Agency will attempt to schedule the hearing within thirty (30) days after the request is


51

received. When sending your appeal, please be sure to print or type your name legibly and include your

social security number and phone number where you may be reached during the day. You have a right

to be represented by an attorney in connection with your appeal. If you cannot afford an attorney you

may be eligible for Legal Services representation. You can contact a Legal Services representative toll

free at 1-800-322-7572 for a referral to the office for your county. Please be aware that scheduling an

appeal hearing does not necessarily stay foreclosure proceedings.

DISCLOSURE OF USE OF INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM OUTSIDE SOURCE:

1. Disclosure inapplicable. The Federal Equal Credit opportunity Act prohibits creditors from

discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex,

marital status, age (provided that the applicant has the capacity to enter into a binding contract);

because all or part of the applicant's income derives from any public assistance program; or

because the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the Consumer Credit Protection

Act. The Federal Agency that administers compliance with this law concerning this creditor is the

Federal Trade Commission, Equal Credit Opportunity, Washington, D.C.

Sincerely,

THE PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY

HPREJECT

Rev. September 2003

December 15, 2005 - Meeting of Creditors Reading Courtroom 1 3rd Floor610-320-5255 341 Meeting

with Mr. Ward of Department of Justice, No Creditors attended. Routine meeting to clarify under oath

schedules submitted. Said to submit all filings to Reading Courts and would only hear from DOJ if

anything additional is needed. Asked when...

December 17, 2005 - Judge McLaughlin Hearing Request

Stanley J. Caterbone (pro se)

220 Stone Hill Road

Conestoga, PA 17516


52

Honorable Judge Mary A. McLaughlin

December 28, 2005 - Cyber warehouse Restore System $50 to restore to factory settings $45 wireless

pci card for old HP Laptop

December 31, 2005 - Depart for Los Cabos SouthWest Fl to Houston 7:20am charged me an extra $25

for luggage that they ended up loosing later in the day in Houston.

January 01, 2006 - Continental Airlines Could not talk to anyone about problem finally at about 8:30

talked to Continental at ticket counter, no flights, all booked until Wednesday. Put me on standby for

other flights that day, but said probably would not get on a flight. Kept arguing about problem with

several ticket agents, very

January 03, 2006 Finally got a flight out to Houston again, abuse and intimidation by Continental

employees, not happy about me getting a flight. Had to pay additional charge of $100 for ticket.

January 05, 2006 - Letter to Editor Drew Anthon Civility, professional etiquette, and the public discourse

for the Lancaster Convention Center debate. Tonight at the meeting at Farm and Home, I had

approached Mr. Drew Anthon and politely asked him to discuss and settle my civil complaint. This was

th...

January 05, 2006 - Complaint number: I06010506177009Password: luggage On January 30 I had

planned to visit Los Cabos, Mexico, for a business trip. I had used the Internet to locate the airport (PTO)

for that destination to locate and book the necessary travel accommodations. “PVR” (Puerto Vallarta,

Mexico) appeared on sev...

January 05, 2006 - Judge Mary McLaughlin, J Order to Serve Notice is received

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STANLEY J. CATERBONE v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, ET EL NO. 05-2288 ORDER CIVIL

ACTION

January 05, 2006 – Federal Bureau of Investigation Internet Crime Unit Complaint number:

I06010506177009 FBI IFCC Complaint via letter


53

January 06, 2006 Complaint number: I06010506177009 USPS

January 06, 2006 Complaint number: I06010506177009 via USPS

January 09, 2006 Judge Twardowski Order of Creditors 610-320-5255 phone Ext 248 Kathy,

Twardowski Clerk Ext 243 Twardowski

January 12, 2006 Honda Inspection

January 12, 2006 Received Judge Mary McLaughlin Serve Order of Jan 5 2005

January 13, 2006 Lancaster County Redevelopment Authority Meeting with Randy Patterson -

Discussed Concerts, said Joe probably does not have any, was not interested in getting involved, said

not his responsibility, Barnstormers manage facility and their option. Said we keep going around in

circles.

January 13, 2006 - Stanley J. Caterbone (pro se)

220 Stone Hill Road

the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (010...

610-320-5255 phone

Ext 248 Kathy, Twardowski Clerk Ext 243 Twardowski

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In Re: Stanley J. Caterbone Debtor Case No: 05-23059-tmtChapter: 11

January 17, 2006 FBI Field Office in Harrisburg; Called about computer hacking and intruders

January 18, 2006 PA Housing Finance Hearing 780-3937 780-4031fax

January 18, 2006 Notice of Service To Fed Civil Actions Mailed all complaints and Judge Mclaughlin's

Notice of Service Package, with the exception of Southern Regional Police Department <end>

January 19, 2006 Joe Pinto Village Clair Bros Email Stan- Thanks for your help on this!! Joe

Delivery Confirmation™ Label Number: 0103 8555 7495 2644 2732 Judge Thomas M. Twardowski,

Unite...


54

Filed Drew Anthon Default Notice and it was stamped in the Prothonotary office at 3:00pm by Audrey

January 20, 2006 Served Drew Anthon Default Notice Served Default Notice to Diane McMahon, the

Secretary in the Marketing Office of the Eden Resort Inn. She said Drew was out of the office, so she

gave the notice to Drew's Secretary while I was there. I went to have 1 drink at the Lounge Bar at the

Eden...

January 20, 2006 Meeting with Joe Pinto & Slide at Snow Magic

January 21, 2006 Yarnell Security Sys Letter YARNELL SECURITY SYSTEMS

131 ELMWOOD RD . LANCASTER PA 17602.717-399-3900 January 20,2006

PA 175 18Dear Mr. Caterbone, We

Turns to a bitchy nagging wife……. <end>

January 23, 2006 US Dept of Justice Hugh Ward letter U.S. Department of Justice Office of the United

States Trustee Eastern District of Pennsylvania 833 Chestnut Street(215) 597-4411 Suite 500 fax (215)

597-5795 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER

COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVLL ACTION - LAW PROJECT HOPE/ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP 220

Stone Hill Road

DRREESWOR ATN RESORT INN AND CONF...

Richard S. Solove, Esquire McNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC

180 Good Drive

Lancaster, PA 17603 (717) 291-1177 Attorney I.D. #I7717 Attorney for Defendants

PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTIO...

Barley Snyder, LLC, Attorneys at Law

126 East King Street

Lancaster, PA 17602-2893

28th Jan Auditorium Theater Chicago - On Sale Dec 10

Sale Dec 10 <end>


55

610-320-5255 phone Ext 248 Kathy, Twardowski Clerk Ext 243 Twardowski

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

February 01, 2006 ANSWER TO FULTON BANK REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY

Local Bankruptcy Form 9014-3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN

DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE :

January 27, 2006 – Claim filed with Harleysville Insurance Company regarding the Los Cabos trip and

all related Freud and deception.

On January 30 I had planned to visit Los Cabos, Mexico, for a business trip. I had used the Internet to locate the airport (PTO) for that destination to locate and book the necessary travel accommodations. ¿PVR¿ (Puerto Vallarta, Mexico) appeared on several Google searches as that airport. I accordingly booked flight itinerary and tickets for that trip. On January 31 I booked a flight from Houston Hobby airport to ¿PVR¿ (Continental Flight 1768, Seat 10D). I had some knowledge of the PTO system, having the national register for PTO’s when I had my plane operating, the Piper Navajo Chieftain, in 1987. I had logged several flights, as far away as Atlanta, and booked it for charter to several clients. ¿PVR¿ was not, in fact, the airport for that destination. I had consumed an estimated $2,000 in expenses for that trip, and never was able to travel to Los Cabos as planned. I was denied a car rental after landing in ¿PVR¿ without any lodging accommodations. I had to spend 3 evenings in the PVR airport because of no lodging accommodations. The only accommodation I could find was at a price of $389.00 (Marriot Hotel) per night, well beyond my budget. I was not allowed fair access to certain return flights to Houston Hobby airport, and was in a constant state of intimidation by the agents at ¿PVR¿ that were under the employ of Continental Airlines. Continental Airlines made no attempt to remedy any of these problems, or make any attempt to accommodate my concerns or complaints. Southwest Airlines conveniently lost my only piece of carryon luggage from Philadelphia to Houston, on January 31 (Flight 1950/2646); which contained my only seasonal clothing, as well as legal and business files of the Advanced Media Group, and related computer hardware. I had to purchase shorts, t-shirts, and sandals, because of that mishap. Southwest Airlines made no real attempt to transport the lost baggage to ¿PVR¿, where I needed it, and tried to use acts of intimidation during my filing of that claim in the Houston Hobby office of Southwest Airlines. (Southwest Airlines Lost Baggage Claim Report number 1000777444). I estimate that the lost monies for this mishap to be approximately $2,200. The airfare alone was $1500. Car rental fees (Avis) were approximately $170. Clothing and other related accessories were approximately $100.00. Food expenses were approximately $200. Upon finally arriving back at the Philadelphia Airport, my battery had been tampered with, and my final trip home was extended an additional 3 hours, this was after the delay of another 4 hours by the Southwest flight from Orlando to Philadelphia. I had been randomly selected for ¿private¿ searches by the Homeland Security agents upon every stop, and in Houston, Texas, was accused by an inspection device (false positive reading) as carrying a plastic explosive in my carry-on luggage, and was treated as such. In addition, a portable storage device was also corrupted during this process, via the Internet. Spending New Years Eve in the ¿PVR¿ airport, cold with only rigid, hard, and very uncomfortable seating, with no one that understood English, all the while experiencing extreme back pain (currently under a physician¿scare and treatment) ---- priceless. Description of how you were defrauded: On January 30 I had planned to visit Los Cabos, Mexico, for a business trip. I had used the Internet


56

to locate the airport (PTO) for that destination to locate and book the necessary travel accommodations. ¿PVR¿ (Puerto Vallarta, Mexico) appeared on several Google searches as that airport. I accordingly booked flight itinerary and tickets for that trip. On January 31 I booked a flight from Houston Hobby airport to ¿PVR¿ (Continental Flight 1768, Seat 10D). I had some knowledge of the PTO system, having the national register for PTO¿s when I had my plane operating, the Piper Navajo Chieftain, in 1987. I had logged several flights, as far away as Atlanta, and booked it for charter to several clients. ¿PVR¿ was not, in fact, the airport for that destination. I had consumed an estimated $2,000 in expenses for that trip, and never was able to travel to Los Cabos as planned. I was denied a car rental after landing in ¿PVR¿ without any lodging accommodations. I had to spend 3 evenings in the ¿PVR¿ airport because of no lodging accommodations. The only accommodation I could find was at a price of $389.00 (Marriot Hotel) per night, well beyond my budget. I was not allowed fair access to certain return flights to Houston Hobby airport, and was in a constant state of intimidation by the agents at ¿PVR¿ that were under the employ of Continental Airlines. Continental Airlines made no attempt to remedy any of these problems, or make any attempt to accommodate my concerns or complaints. Southwest Airlines conveniently lost my only piece of carryon luggage contained my only seasonal clothing, as well as legal and business files of the Advanced Media Group, and related computer hardware. I had to purchase shorts, t-shirts, and sandals, because of that mishap. Southwest Airlines made no real attempt to transport the lost baggage to ¿PVR¿, where I needed it, and tried to use acts of intimidation during my filing of that claim in the Houston Hobby office of Southwest Airlines. (Southwest Airlines Lost Baggage Claim Report number 1000777444). I estimate that the lost monies for this mishap to be approximately $2,200. The airfare alone was $1500. Car rental fees (Avis) were approximately $170. Clothing and other related accessories were approximately $100.00. Food expenses were approximately $200. upon finally arriving back at the Philadelphia Airport, my battery had been tampered with, and my final trip home was extended an additional 3 hours, this was after the delay of another 4 hours by the Southwest flight from Orlando to Philadelphia. I had been randomly selected for ¿private¿ searches by the Homeland Security agents upon every stop, and in Houston, Texas, was accused by an inspection device (false positive reading) as carrying a plastic explosive in my carry-on luggage, and was treated as such. In addition, a portable storage device was also corrupted during this process, via the Internet. Spending New Years Eve in the ¿PVR¿ airport, cold with only rigid, hard, and very uncomfortable seating, with no one that understood English, all the while experiencing extreme back pain (currently under a physician’s care and treatment) ---- priceless.

February 02, 2006 - Judge Twardowski Feb 2 Order UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT 01: PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Stanley J. Caterbone

February 03, 2006 - Lance formally and publicly breaks off engagement to Sheryl by going public and

releasing public statements.

February 03, 2006 - Rcvd LC KEGEL KELIN ALMY & GRlMM response to Fed Civil Action


57

Woke up and found Ipod and Ring Missing (wedding band on ring finger take off during the night by

someone). Ipod was crashed and charging in van.

February 05, 2006 - Conestoga Police Speeding Ticket

February 06, 2006 - Ipod Found.

February 06, 2006 - Donegal Policy Due $159 PAE 3015468 faxed to 426-7031 <end>

February 06, 2006 Manheim Township Police Order to Dismiss Federal cv05-0288 to Judge McLaughlin

2005 to the Court requesting permission to amend his "comp This Court by Order dated January 5,2006,

directed Plaintiff to serve his summons and …

February 10, 2006 - Drew Anthon Motion Due 180 Good Drive Lancaster, PA 17603 (717) 291-1177

Attorney I.D. #I7717 Attorney for Defendants PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

CIVIL ACTIO...Took back digital box for replacement, gave colored woman bankruptcy papers for her

superior, was again going to turn off cable.

February 10, 2006 Drew Anthon Notice of Items Feb. 10 2006 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION

PROJECT HOPE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

220 Stone Hill Road

February 12, 2006 Joe Roda & Diane Nast email Feb. 12 2006 Dear Joe and Diane: These are the

documents I currently have filed in Federal courts. I just saw you were back to work, so I thought I should

share these with you. Please understand that the quotation of my statement

Re: Do you know my cousin, Diane Nast?

To: <[email protected]>Date:...

Again went to Comcast after digital service was again shutt off. Again, another useless phone call to

customer service. Told them that Mable of the Legal dept processed bankruptcy order. After about 20

minutes, said service was restored.


58

February 15, 2006 – Letter to the PA Housing Finance Agency;


220 Stone Hill Road

Conestoga, PA 17516

S.S. #: 200-46-6095

Chief Counsel - HEMAP Hearing Request,

PHFAIHEMAP,

21 1 North Front Street,

P.O. Box 15628,

Harrisburg, PA, 17105-5628

Facsimile: 717-780-4031

February 16, 2006

Re: NOTICE OF DECISION OF HEARING EXAMINER

For the record, I did not provide the statements in the report as you have determined. I protest the

accuracy of the statements that were reported in the Decision, and formally request a copy of the tape

recording. I also have determined there are several inaccuracies concerning the facts that were

established. Given that you a Federally funded program, what courts would have jurisdiction in any

appeals that may follow?

February 21, 2006 Fulton Hearing in Reading 1. If you do not want the court to grant the relief sought in

the motion or if you want the court to consider your views on the motion, then on or before February 8,

2006 you or your attorney must do & of the following:Judge Twardowski Feb 2 Order

February 22, 2006 Visit Comcast to confirm appt.

February 22, 2006 - Lancaster County Commissioners Meeting Art Morris, and Planning Commission.

Walked out after hearing they awarded the consultants bid 1 week before RFP was due.


59

February 22, 2006 Suburban Cable Appt Cable modem turned on before Comcast tech even entered

my office, how could that happen? Blue light on Vonage modem was lit for first time since Friday, the

week before.

February 23, 2006 – Letter from Lynn Stoy of the PA Housing Agency denying my request for a

transcript of the Hearing in January.

February 24, 2006 Received Leo Eckert summons from Conestoga Police

COUNTY OF:

March 01, 2006 Lancaster County Commissioners Meeting

March 01, 2006 Lancaster County District Attorney Office Drop off letter to Donald Attorney <end>

March 01, 2006 Lancaster Chamber of Commerce Request 2006 fee schedule for Project Hope and

Advanced Media Group. See Sharon Roda, who works for the Economic Development and David

Nikollof. Did not know she worked there and asked

to visit with her.

March 01, 2006 Visit Joe Pinto at Clipper Stadium Stopped by to see Joe about the concert schedule for

the summer. Joe was busy.

March 02, 2006 Phone call from Attorney JoLynn Stoy of PHFA Another argument about getting the

recording of my Appeal Hearing on Jan 18th in Harrisburg. She again tried to lie her way out of the fact

that they fabricated my statement in their finding. Hung up

on her. <end>

March 02, 2006 Mail Certified letter to JoLynn Stoy

March 04, 2006 Interrogation

March 05, 2006 NSA


60

March 07, 2006 Hypnosis Seminar Talk to someone and they said smoking would be over at 8pm and

the diet would start at 8pm and end at 10. $59. fee to attend. The went to Dispensing com and had 2

beers, then to Alley Kat had 3 drinks and 3 cokes until 1:15am, then went home. Went back ...March 08,

2006

Desk Sergeant and tall shorthaired officer carrying black gym bag were at front desk. Laid my business

card on desk and asked if "they knew what chlorphorme was, and that I heard rumors around town that

someone was using that stuff, and they should clean...

March 21, 2006 Someone just shot at me At approx 6:30 am this morning I was out by the side of my

house in the woods tying up a tree and someone from the adjacent valley shot one shot which sounded

like it was it could have been at me. There were no hunters in the area that I could see. Their...

March 21, 2006 EXCELSIOR PLACE INVESTOR Excelsior to get new investor Partner to be revealed

today for E. King project BY PAULA HOLZMAN, Intelligencer Journal Staff Today's city Redevelopment

Authority meeting could break the deadlock on plans to renovate several

March 22, 2006 – Facsimile to Lin Patch, Appeals Officer of the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency

Fax Cover Sheet

To: Lin Patch, Appeals Officer

Hemap Appeals Unit

Company: Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency

Fax Number:

From: Stan Caterbone

Date: March 22, 2006 2:58pm

Re: Appeal to Commonwealth Courts

I have received the tape recording of my appeal hearing on March 15, 2006, and upon further review, the

following statement was not found on the recording of my hearing: The applicant provided the following

statement with respect to the cause of the mortgage delinquency: "These circumstances came about

when I met with officials from International Signal & Control, plc., in 1987 and became involved with

agencies providing the United States of America associated with the highest level of Intelligence and

National Security. I was called upon by ISC to help to provide financial assistance for portions of their


61

[sic] operations. I immediately became suspect of these circumstances following my meeting of June 23,

1987; and alerted various officials of local, state, and federal authorities. It was these allegations that

resulted in a 'Billion Dollar Fraud' that was successfully prosecuted by the United State Attorney General

and the Federal Bureau [sic] of Investigation in 1990. Thiese circumstances have been before now, a

dire problem within the scope and bounds of our National Security. These circumstances are now able to

be adjucated within the Court of Law under the provisions and doctrines of the Constitution of the United

States of America. During these activities, certain agencies of the intelligence community began

extracting information on present and future issues concerning the current state of affairs of the United

States of America." I also have learned that Mr. Cooper in the hearing stated that an appeal to the

Commonwealth Courts time expired after 30 days, or 6 days after you provided me with the recorded

transcript, which I initially requested on or about February 10, 2006. Was it your intention to delay the

delivery of the tape recording so that the time for filing my appeal would have expired?

March 25, 2006 Key to Honda Stolen Mom's House and Billy Plank Found beer can in back yard, and

newspapers in kitchen. Noticed people may have been inside house. While there, white small car pulled

up in back beside Billy Planks truck, got out and crawled under truck. Was a clue about the key under my

van that was...

March 25, 2006 Went home to get key for Safety Deposit Box March 25, 2006 Hypnotized (Key) Fulton

Bank Safety Deposit Box Hypnotized with the Key Trick, Alarm went off on car, don't know how, younger

woman beside my car, lipstick. Lost key to ignition, got out of car, stood beside car, went back into car

and key was gone. Went to get key under car, and it was gone. Wanted...

March 25, 2006 Hypnotized (Key) Fulton Bank Safety Deposit Box Hypnotized with the Key Trick, Alarm

went off on car, don't know how, younger woman beside my car, lipstick. Lost key to ignition, got out of

car, stood beside car, went back into car and key was gone. Went to get key under car, and it was gone.

Wanted...

March 25, 2006 Gib Armstrong Office

Pick up Right to Know and Freedom of Information Act documents.

March 28, 2006 Received Judge Fehling Order for Hearing UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


62

April 02, 2006 Someone Enters 220 Stone Hill Road Ran out of house after someone hiding in

basement

April 02, 2006 Registration Stolen from Dodge Pickup

April 03, 2006 Person breaks into 220 Stone Hill Road Leave driveway and with pickup go to Wagon

Wheel for coffee and newspaper, group of Men laughing at me. I ask them if anyone of them was in my

house, stay out of house until 1:30pm.

April 03, 2006 Chorophormed released in Car

April 04, 2006 Southern Regional Police Keep Pounding At Door Said they just wanted to talk, Fedor

and Chief Fiorell Security took picture. Said I was sick and wanted to help me.

April 04, 2006 Phil Called From Austin Texas Said Lance was out of town this week.

April 04, 2006 Fax Southern Regional Police Suit to Don Totaro, Lancaster County District Attorney

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS LANCASTER COUNTY CIVIL

DIVISION Stanley J. Caterbone County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania :

April 05, 2006 Officer Buser/Lancaster General Hospital/Millersville Police/East Lampeter

April 07, 2006 Conestoga Speeding Tickets & Inspection Hearing This court has received your plea of

NOT GUILTY to the above summary violation(s). The sum of $ 112.50 has been accepted as collateral

for your appearance at trial. Your trial has been scheduled as follows: PLEASE TAKE NOTE WHERE

BEARING WILL…

April 08, 2006 - . Hospital Missing Mail Civil Action Complaint given to Staff to mail at 1:00am missing,

rest of mail shown to me and was never mailed.

April 10, 2006 Dr. Pressley 2nd Opinion Dr. Bill Met with Dr. Bill, would not answer question regarding

verifying 302 Order.

April 11, 2006 Judge Anita Brody Appeal to Fulton Bank Stay Entered


63

April 11, 2006 Judge McLaughlin Order for Continuance to May 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Stanley J. Caterbone CIVIL ACTION

April 12, 2006 Sent Transcript to Judicial Conduct Review Board COMMONWEALTH OF

PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD PENNSYLVANIPAL PLACE 301 CHESTNUT STREET

SUITE 403.

April 13, 2006 17101 717-234- 7911March 27,2006Stanley Caterbone220 ...

April 14, 2006 34 Foot Admiral Holiday Rambler Test Drove 30 foot <end>

April 14, 2006 The Sharks Live Walked in and wanted to pay for ticket, said wanted to see Gus and

walked into Village. Dave and Heather, Ken Ray & Carol, Den Lilly, Kratzert, Suzanne Porter, Brett, Fred,

Billy T. Joe Klaus,

April 16, 2006 George at Village Would not let me back in. Said about ticket, and he would not let me

pay him for the ticket.

April 17, 2006 Cable Disconnected Paid Comcast at Office All Cable disconnected at telephone pole.

Sov Bank Project Hope Check #129 Susan Gibson would not turn cable and internet on. Said I had to

pay $990.42 <end>

April 18, 2006 Comcast Suit Fax to Anita Brody Re: Civil Action 05-2288 The 5 page fax you sent

through eFax.com to 12155802356 was successfully transmitted at 2006-04-19 00:28:29 (GMT).

receiving machine's fax ID: .____________...

April 18, 2006 Millersville Boro Police Report 872-4657 Patrolman Michael K. Schaeffer, who took report

on gave me incident no. 2006-MU-00509 Phone 717-872-4657 Fax 717-872-4705 10 Colonial Avenue

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS LANCASTER COUNTY CIVIL

DIVISION Stanley J. Caterbone Applied for Food Stamps

April 18, 2006 Pham Computers

Said could not order Avaratec Power cord, said it might be internal power supply.


64

April 18, 2006 Priority Mail Wcrow & Daile High Priority mail transaction No. 72 USPS 414408-9550

Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road Email April 17, 2006Mr. Dale High High IndustriesFrom :

Advanced Media Group <[email protected]>

Sent : Wednesday, April 19, 2006 4:58 AM To : <[email protected]>

See Federal Civil Action No. 05-2288... Walked in to get a copy of Littering Citation, (Rick) Desk Officer

began yelling at me and told me that I was driving while drinking, even though my car was parked.

Officer asked for my key after he followed me out to my car, gave me a parking ticket fo...

April 22, 2006 Drove to get a paper. Took a shower at Mom's house to go back to Lancaster City Police

Station for my Key and license.

April 22, 2006 Lancaster City Police Station Went in to get license and key and Desk Officer (woman)

kept yelling at me and gave my key back and said I would have to come back tonight to get my license

back. Told me to get out of station and never to come back again!

April 22, 2006 Lancaster County Library Update calendar and email. Tried to lock me out of system.

April 24, 2006 LiHeap Application No More walking, told to come back tomorrow Lois Gascho on

vacation out all week.

April 25, 2006 LiHeap Application $600 from LiHeap, Bankruptcy papers faxed to PP&L; Docket Judge

Anita Brody Order of Oct 5 PP&L to turn on Electric on Wed am

April 25, 2006 Reading Court Hearing Parking Meter

April 25, 2006 Lancaster County Library Got MSN Alert for Reading Parking Ticket Hearing, called

District Justice in Reading

April 25, 2006 FBI Internet Crime Unit Reported calendar hacked and alert for Reading Parking Ticket

and Alert changed.

April 26, 2006 Judge Anita Brody Appeal Due


65

April 26, 2006 Lancaster County Assistance Food Stamps Said denied last year because of resources

(5,000 in bank, credit card liability) Said denied last year because failed to show to interview. Would not

tell me how long to get food stamps

April 27, 2006 District Justice Ballentine Caterbone v. Comcast

April 28, 2006 Amended LGH & Southern Regional Police Department COMMONWEALTH OF

PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF LANCASTER CIVIL DIVISION Stanley J.

Caterbone COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF

LANCASTER CIVIL DIVISION Stanley J. Caterbone to Lancaster General Hospital CIVIL COMPLAINT

CI-06-03349 Emily at information desk, called to corporate, would not give me directions to department,

served 2 copies to LGH and Dr. Pressley

April 28, 2006 Service to William Campbell of Southern Regional Police Left copy inside door. See

pictures.

April 28, 2006 Barnstormers Opening Game

April 29, 2006 Tommy's Anniversary Planted our garden.

May 01, 2006 Totaro's Office, Lancaster County DA Office Requested meeting, told to write letter.

Obstruction of Justice Southern Regional Police Shellenberger

May 01, 2006 Lancaster County Commissioners Office Copy of Letter to Henderson, tried to make

appointment, staff said will not see me for meeting.

May 02, 2006 Millersville Boro Police Incident Report Now, said cannot have incident report.

April 21, 2006

Advanced Media Group Stanley J. Caterbone

220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516Millersville Borough Police Department Michael K...

May 02, 2006 Lance Look alike peddling on near Penn Manor Middle School


66

May 02, 2006 Danny Hershey Talked to Danny for awhile; Gun Shop; told me about DA Detective M.

Landis being a "problem and a lunatic", kept telling me about him, said he lived near Dave on Slackwater

Road, asked if I was having a problem with Dave, and said he was a problem, ……aske...

May 03, 2006 Talked to Chief Rochet via phone of Millersville Boro Police requested incident Re... Told

me to call Sue Moyer of the Lancaster County DA office, would not give incident report FAX COVER

SHEET TO COMPANY FAX NUMBER FROM DATE RE COVER MESSAGE +1-7172953693 Stan

Caterbone Ma5y/ 0033/,0 260 90:628 DATE RE COVER MESSAGE +1-7172934470 Stan I think it is the

judicial branch of government, not the executive; but thanks for the information anyway. I will handle the

problem we discussed today in another manner. As I stated, I will not put myself in harms way by going

near Officer Buser of So... May 04, 2006 Civil Complaint Pam Pflumm AOPC 308A-05

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

COUNTY OF: Lancaster CIVIL COMPLAINT Magisterial District Number: Ma0y2 0-24-,0 AOPC 411A-05

1-2 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF:Lancaster Magisterial District Number : FAX

COVER SHEET TO COMPANY FAX NUMBER FROM DATE RE COVER MESSAGE +1-5738889802

Stan Caterbone

5/04/06 4:03 AM could you please confirm the where...

2006 Business Law Seminar: Lancaster

May 08, 2006 Richard Plum phone call Harleysville Insurance Company Said he would overnight new

affidavit, argued about why no one alerted about deficiencies

May 10, 2006 Fulton Bank Commercial Loan Application Branch Manager refused to provide application

or any documentation

May 10, 2006 Fulton Bank Commercial Loan Application Bill Dougherty, Branch Manager on 1st floor;

would not provide me with an application. Process was to provide financial statements; kept requested

documentation as to application and process, refused. Said did not mail it, would go out today, again

lied.

May 11, 2006 – Went to U.S. Postal Station on Harrisburg Pike, Lancaster, man came up to me “Capt

Palmer? Said he was Dick Shellenberger brother-in-law, wanted to talk to me, kept backing me up while

trying to weigh envelopes, told him to get away, I was busy, walked outside and waited, told him I was

busy and walked away”.


67

May 15, 2006 Availability Staffing Went to talk to Tony Spinello, would not meet, met with Amber.

May 16, 2006 Judge Brody Brief Due

May 17, 2006 FBI Harrisburg Office Obstruction of Justice Complaint Travel to Washington DC

May 17, 2006 Help Make LIVESTRONG DAY One to Remember "It's time for our nation to address our

issues. Together, we can help change things for the better. As a team, we can make a difference for

survivors." -Lance Armstrong

Schedule appt.

May 17, 2006 Senate Select Committee on Intelligence 2 photographers take my picture outside

Hearings Gave phone number to call. FOXNews.com - Intel Panels Hear From NSA Director - Politics

Visit and request meeting with receptionist or another attorney

May 18, 2006 Availabity Staffing Follow up with Amber, said she had someone else in office that could

help find some part-time consulting. Talked with …. Did not even read resume, told him if he had a client

that wanted to increase profits to call me. Said only dealt with manufacturing,..

.

March 29, 2006, 4:05 PM ET Jonathan Cohen, N.Y. Taylor for the 2006 Rainforest B... Joe Pinto Lied

As per the instructions of the receptionist in Senator Specter's office yesterday, I would like to meet with

the Senator regarding information that I have previously sent.

Please forward a date at your earliest convenience.

Thank You for your considerations.


Stan Caterbone

mailto: [email protected]

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

Fax: (717) 427-1621


68

May 19, 2006 Dave Pflumm and Brett Stabley Thought they stole my wife

May 21, 2006 Harleysville Claim Priority Mail

May 22, 2006 Payments for Advanced Media Group Vonage Phone 17.48 Rhapsody .99 Go to My PC

24.95 EBay 15.95 Andale 16.95 Efax 10.00 Nextel

155.00

May 22, 2006 Advance Media v. Mike, Stabley, Pflumm COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS LANCASTER COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION Advanced Media Group Stanley

J. Caterbone Ma2y2 202 County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania: Agent is not processing above claim and

keeps lying to me. After I submitted claim forms and did not hear from him, I called him and he said that

a sworn and notarized affidavit required embossed seal from notary, proved that was not the case. Then

he s...

May 22, 2006 PA Insurance Complaint Agent is not processing above claim and keeps lying to me. After

I submitted claim forms and did not hear from him, I called him and he said that a sworn and notarized

affidavit required embossed seal from notary, proved that was not the case. Then he s... Mike, I

(Advanced Media Group) am suing you for libel, slander and defamation of character. Just what is it you

are trying to accomplish by slandering me with this mental illness allegation?

You need to come clean with how my business with AIM back in 2001 was lost. I find it ironic that as

soon as I received my inheritance from Dad, Dave told me he knew that I went to a different bank to

deposit the funds, and shortly thereafter, you called me and said that your regional sales manager

received some complaints from some wholesalers about the updates I was sending out to you and the

other clients that I had with AIM.

You see Mike, since 1987, you all have been interfering with my business and my finances. You take my

money and my income, and when I try to resolve that through the courts, which is precisely where

matters of this kind are resolved, you go back and slander and libel me with this mental illness allegation.

You have not seen me since February of 2005, and I have only spoken with you on a few occasions,

very briefly, and you never mentioned anything about me being mentally ill.


69

Now, you are going to have to answer in court what type of behavior you have witnessed that leads you

to the conclusion that I am having mental illness problems.

I am in the midst of litigating these and other past issues in the United States Court of the Eastern District

of Pennsylvania, Civil Action 05-2288 (which is sealed to the public), and you are obstructing justice and

interfering with my right to due process. Everyone that has libeled me with these mental illness

allegations will find that they will find a similar civil action filed against them.

I only have a hundred dollars left, and Mom still owes me from the judgment that was awarded to me in

Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas last July. Legally, I cannot leave Lancaster until all of my

legal issues are properly adjucated through the courts, or I will face bench warrants for my arrest.

So, I am asking you once again to overnight mail me the final payment of $800 and I will satisfy the

judgment against 1250 Fremont Street. You can ask Mom just how much she has paid me so far. A few

months ago she sent me a check for $200, and said she would send me the rest of the payments. Last

week she said she would send me a check, and I still have not received it.

Attached is the civil action that I am filing.

And you also need to stop interfering with my relationship with Sheryl, and you better stay away from her.

----Original Message Follows----

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: The right thing?

Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 08:45:06 -0400

Stan you need to get help. You need to see a doctor and get back on your medication. I know you don’t

see this but your not well and we want to help. If you see a doctor I will help financially. Money is not

going to solve your problems in your current condition. Your entire solution to every this is through the

courts and what happens when you exhausted all your options and that what? Mom is getting very old

and we don’t know how much time she has so please leave her alone and you can deal with me. I wish

you could see what you’re doing to yourself but i guess you cant. I know you’re pissed off but we want to


70

help. What is happening with your house? How far behind are you in your mortgage payments and

don’t give me your bankruptcy info. Because donor or later your going to have to settle.

Just trying to help.

Mike

From: Stan Caterbone <[email protected]>


Sent: Fri, 19 May 2006 09:06:18 -0400

Subject: The right thing?

Just what did you mean.

and this is your brother Stan.


Stan Caterbone

mailto: [email protected]

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

Fax: (717) 427-1621


220 Stone Hill Road

Conestoga, PA 17516

May 23, 2006 Email Convention Center Recommendations from March 2005 1 of 2 5/24/2006 4:32

AM Sent : Tuesday, May 23, 2006 1:21 PM... Filed appeal and Forma Papaus to Appeal Reading Traffic

Tickets

May 23, 2006 Convention Over Budget Lancaster New Era Lancaster New Era: Center bids $25M over

budget http://eedition.lancasteronline.com/pages/news/edition/NEPM/200... 1 of 3 5/23/2006 8:19 PM


71

costs could be 30% higher than... CV-0000160-06 Comcast must send notice to defend, otherwise do

not attend. Tried to make me miss this hearing, original taken, I thought it was for June 26, went today to

get

May 26, 2006 Hearing Caterbone v. Comcast CV-0000160-06 Comcast must send notice to defend,

otherwise do not attend.

May 26, 2006 Barley Snyder, LLC - Lancaster General Hospital File Stolen Gave formal notice to

Attorneys Meagan Ford and Mattson regarding LGH file stolen, said allegations that their client may have

been involved, Caroline (African American woman) at reception desk. Called to executive secretary of

both attorneys, were not a...

May 26, 2006 Judge Mary J. McLaughlin Letter faxed Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road

Conestoga, PA 17516

May 26, 2006 Judicial Conduct States District Court for the Eastern District Please explain your

complaint on the reverse of this from. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL CONDUCT

BOARD Pennsylvania Place 301 Chestnut Street, Suite 403 OFFICIAL USE

May 29, 2006 Judicial Conduct Review Board Complaint filed Please explain your complaint on the

reverse of this from. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD

Pennsylvania Place 301 Chestnut Street, Suite 403 Harrisburg, PA

.

May 29, 2006 Grassel Answer to Civil Complaint Due

May 30, 2006 Southern Regional Police Dept Answer Due

May 30, 2006 Kenny Chesney -- Opening for Chesney will be Sugarland and Jake Owen

May 31, 2006 Artie email for Convention Center March 2005 Artie, thanks for the intelligent reply and

discussion. You should understand, there is not too much that you have said that I disagree with. You

are right on point in your analysis. However, too understand my perception, you must understand my

experience...


72

May 31, 2006 - Robert Walker email Advanced Media Group From: Advanced Media Group

[[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 3:48 AM

[email protected] Printed: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:49 AM

May 31, 2006 – Omnis Networks illegally cancels the account for hosting the website

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com without a courtesy call to pay the outstanding invoice as

promised on a telephone conversation with the agent named “Eddie” the previous week.

June 1, 2006 – Response from the Lancaster Newspapers regarding cancellation of editions;

Mr Caterbone’s am responding to your inquiry concerning your edition. The account has been stopped.

When it was started, we were provided with a credit/debit card to pay for the access on a monthly basis.

Starting 4/26, when we tried to process a monthly charge, it was declined. It had been tried for with

weeks of 5/3, 5/10, 5/17 & 5/24 with no success. Access was suspended on 5/26 with an amount due of

$ 3.88. We received your payment of $ 3.88, which paid your account to date. If you wish to have access

to the edition again, we would need to have a credit or debit card to use for the monthly access charge. If

I can assist you further, please contact me at 291-8627 or sign up on our website.

Shirley

Circulation Customer Service

Lancaster Newspapers, Inc.

_____

From : May 31, 2006 9:41 AM... John Wert Assistant to Judge Scheaffer 610-478-6675 610-478-, file

again to reconsider?" shoul... COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

LANCASTER COUNTY CRIMINIAL DIVISION Commonwealth of Pennsylvania :

June 06, 2006 - Letter from the PA Department of Welfare

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE

LANCASTER COUNTY ASSISTMCE OFFICE

832 Manor Street

P.0. Box 4967 I

Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604-4967

June 7,2006


73

Mr. Stan J. Caterbone,

Per Administrative Law Judge Scott Staller's stipulation, the following information is due

before 6120106 in the Lanmter County Assistance Office:

Verification of your income or lack them35 to show how you have been

supporting yourself since 2003 without income. This would include the

bankruptcy verification, loans against your credit cards, etc.

A copy of a photo identification.

Current bank statements or verification the accounts are closed.

Utility bills

Mortgage payments in the form of a mortgage book or receipts showing your

monthly payment.

The PA 600 application form you took with you at your last interview.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Mrs. Rychalsky, Income

Maintenance Casework Supervisor, at the Lancaster County Assistance Office at (717:)

299-7487. Mrs. Rychalsky will be banding any further issues regarding this appeal.

Thank you.

Amy Montgomery

Income Maintenance Casework Supwvisor

Lancaster County Assistance Office

June 06, 2006

Tim,


74

I had a problem at your Sunoco Gas Station on Orange and Prince street at about 2:30 am today. I went

to get some gasoline and my tank was low when I left my house, but the low fuel indicator light did not

come on.

I paid the cashier with 14 silver half dollars and got a pack of Eagle Lights and the rest $3.93 in gasoline,

or about 1.37 gallons, and pumped the gas into my Honda.

Now, on the way home, at about half way my low fuel indicator light came on. I know that I live about 7

miles from the Sunoco, and my 2005 Honda Odyssey gets at least 20 mpg city.

So, apparently, your Sunoco Station took my $3.93 and never gave me any gas, the meter on the pump

moved and shut off at $3.93, but I am alleging that I never put one drop of gasoline in my Honda, yet the

pump made it look like I was pumping gas into my Honda.

I have the receipt.

June 09, 2006 - Hearing for Conestoga Speeding Ticket TR-0000245-06 TR-0000244-06

As per your request, enclosed is a document that describes the last time I had a traffic citation in

Conestoga Township. As I have stated for the record, every time I seek due process that the constitution

of the United States affords me, this is what happens. I have 8 (fabrications and lies) or so similar

hearing in Lancaster County, I requested a continuance because of the demands of my Federal litigation

and the conspiratorial approach to obstruct justice and subvert my Federal civil actions has me without

the proper time to prepare a sufficient defense. I had wished to include the in court testimony, but time

was lacking to prepare. I was up since 2:00 am the previous morning working on a brief that was due the

Honorable Anita Brody of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on the

same day as your Court Hearing.

Every District Justice in Lancaster County denied me a motion for continuance to grant me sufficient time

to prepare for the Hearings this month. You stated for the record that you could not because of a Court

Order to hear this case within a 90 day time period. I was also denied an Informa Pauperis (I am

indigent due to circumstances beyond my control) from every Business Judge on duty, which also

conveniently denied me my right to have a Court Stenographer transcribe your Hearing, as mandated in

the Rules of Civil Procedure of Pennsylvania. May I subpoena your Surveillance Camera for a

transcription of my Hearing? You will not get away with your small town politics, discriminatory and


75

prejudicial antics used to intimidate me and divert my attention, time and resources from my Federal Civil

Actions. I remind you that you are an Officer of the Court and will be held accountable to the law.

June 09, 2006 Hearing for PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT 717-786-2072 fax

Thank you for your response Mr. Caterbone. I would again explain to you that you should contact E-fax directly at

the phone number I gave you in my initial email to discuss what you believe to be a double charge. It is YOUR

responsibility to discuss the charges with E-fax as you gave them the Visa gift card number. The bank cannot be

responsible for YOUR decisions in regards to which you give YOUR card number. Good luck with YOUR inquiry

with E-fax. If E-fax decides you were double billed, then E-fax will refund your card. Again, call E-fax and use the

reference number that I gave you in regards to YOUR account. At this point, Fulton bank will not be refunding any

funds to you. Have a good day Sir.

-----Original Message-----

From: Advanced Media Group [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 6:55 PM

To: Mummert, Carl

Cc: [email protected]

Subject: RE: Fraud Inquiry by you on Visa Gift Card

Fulton Bank owes me $45.98.

Sir, you are blind, there are (2) $26.90 charges on my Gift card Transaction details. And both were

used to compute the balance of $-.81.

I did not authorize the $10.00 Efax charge.

The $10.08 from Turkey Hill is erroneous; I did not purchase 10.08 of gasoline on June 5th or 4th.

Now Sir, I have a brief due in the chambers of U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania's Honorable Anita Brody, Caterbone v. Fulton Bank, tomorrow.

You, Sir, are harassing me with your lies, and you are obstructing justice and my due process by

harassing me with your phone call right when I began to formulate my brief.

Date Description Amount


76

6/3/2006 Pending - J2 *EFAX PLUS SERV 323-817-3205 CAUS -25.9

6/7/2006 EMPIRE BEAUTY SCHOOL #11 EMPIRE BEAUTY SCHO LANCASTER PAUS -8

6/7/2006 TURKEY HILL #0251 Q69 TURKEY HILL #0251 LANCASTER PAUS -5

6/7/2006 TURKEY HILL #0251 Q69 TURKEY HILL #0251 LANCASTER PAUS -0.5

6/6/2006 THE UPS STORE #3413 THE UPS STORE #341 LANCASTER PAUS -5.94

6/6/2006 FUNKS FARM MARKET N GARDE FUNKS FARM MARKET MILLERSVILLE PAUS -5.05

6/6/2006 ATM Balance Inquiry Fee -1

6/6/2006 MILLERSVILLE MART MILLERSVILLE PAUS -5.39

6/6/2006 J2 *EFAX PLUS SERVICE J2 *EFAX PLUS SERV 323-817-3205 CAUS -10

6/6/2006 TENNISTRAINER EQUIP STORE TENNISTRAINER EQUI 760-9171841 CAUS -16.18


6/5/2006 TURKEY HILL #0076 Q69 TURKEY HILL #0076 LANCASTER PAUS -10.08

6/5/2006 VONAGE *PRICE+TAXES VONAGE *PRICE+TAXE 866-243-4357 NJUS -17.48

6/4/2006 DOLLAR GENERAL 1805 COLUMBIA AVE LANCASTER PAUS -3.64


6/4/2006 J2 *EFAX PLUS SERVICE J2 *EFAX PLUS SERV 323-817-3205 CAUS -25.9

6/4/2006 TURKEY HILL #0246 Q69 TURKEY HILL #0246 LANCASTER PAUS -10

6/2/2006 ATM Withdrawal Fee -2

6/2/2006 PNC NE 1503 COLUMBIA AVE LANCASTER 1PAUS -21.75

6/2/2006 Funds Transfer from Fulton Financial Corp 175

Balance of all Transactions -175.81


77

Balance of Fraudulent Transactions $45.98

From: Mummert, Carl [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 6:26 PM


Subject: Fraud Inquiry by you on Visa Gift Card

Mr. Caterbone,

I just tried to call you to talk to you in regards to your request for information on possible fraud

in relation to your Visa Gift card you purchased last week. As you thought it best to hang up on me

as I tried to explain what I found out by calling E-fax to research your gift card, I will now explain in

brief detail what the fees were you inquired about. The $10.00 fee on June 6th is a pre-paid

amount E-fax charges to allow you to fax pages @ .10 per page. When you use the $10.00, E-fax

will then pre-pay/charge another $10.00. As for your inquiry of being double billed the $25.90. I

spoke with a gentleman named Vincent @ E-Fax and he stated that there is not a double charge

and that you were only billed $25.90 one time for 2 months service (May 2nd to June 1st and June

2 to July 3rd). The monthly charge is $12.95 and since the card # you provided E-fax in May was

denied, they billed you for 2 months in the beginning of June. The Reference # for this information

is 001428472. If you have any further questions in regards to YOUR E-fax account, I would ask

you call E-fax yourself. The # for E-fax is (323) 817-3206. At this time I do not have any

information for you in regards to your inquiry at the $10.08 charged on June 6th.

Mr. Caterbone, since you again feel the best way to handle this situation is to hang up on me

when I was trying to give you this information, I would request that you discontinue contacting

myself. I do not have the time to continue to try and help you when you are unwilling to listen to the

information I have to pass onto you. This is the second time in 3 days that you disrespected me,

with the 1st being on Tuesday, June 6th when you called me ignorant and I would respectfully

request that you no longer ask for help from me. I have tried to be polite and respect you and I

would hope you could do the same. When Fulton bank completes its research as to what the

$10.08 charge was that you are disputing, the bank will contact you by email or letter.

Thank you for your attention to this email and I hope the information I passed onto you so far

is useful.

Respectfully,


78

Carl E Mummert Branch Manager Penn Square Branch Fulton Bank (717)291-2451(Phone) (717)295-4792(Fax) [email protected]

June 11, 2006 Country Music Awards CMA Music Fest Sets Initial Lineup

February 13, 2006, 4:30 PM ET

Katie Hasty, N.Y. Brooks & Dunn, Brad Paisley, Carrie Underwood and Montgomery Gentry are

Music Festival. Slated for June 8-11 in down...

MDT citation for leaving car unattended to go look for Sheryl in Terminal. Left car and talked to

Security Officer and he said it was ok and ordered me to move car, and I did. He did not write me a

citation on that day.

June 15, 2006 Hearing DJ Ballentine Caterbone v. Comcast

From : Cheryl L. Kovaly <[email protected]>Sent : Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:13 PMTo : "Stan

Caterbone" <[email protected]>Subject : RE: Caterbone v. Southern Regional Police Commission

Cheryl L. Kovaly, Esquire

Lavery, Faherty, Young & Patterson, P.C.

225 Market Street, Suite 304

Harrisburg, PA 17101

[email protected]

(717) 233-6633

June 19, 2006

H. Gus Dorn

Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania

Office Of Attorney General


79

Bureau Of Consumer Protection

Harrisburg Regional Office

301 Chestnut Street, Suite 105

Harrisburg, PA 17101

(7171 787-7109

May 31, 2006

Re: A-002594-2006

As per our conversation, I will address the issues contained in Mr. Yarnell’s response to your office.

Please not that I was not given any of the exhibits that Mr. Yarnell submitted to your office.

“On August 26,2005 we entered into an agreement with Mr. Caterbone for the installation and monitoring

of an alarm system at 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17518. Our standard pricing for the system he

ordered is $1,899.00 and then he would pay $192.00 per year for the monitoring of the system. Another

option he was given was to pay $1,324.00 for the installation and then pay $299.40 per year for 5 years.

Mr. Caterbone chose the 2nd option. (Attached marked items A and B are the contracts and the service

rider).”

Above paragraph is not contested.

“Mr. Caterbone gave us a check in the amount of $800.00 for the system deposit so that we could start

the job. (Item C) The installation was scheduled for September 30, 2005. Our technician arrived at the

site and installed the system. Mr. Caterbone agreed that the system was installed to his satisfaction and

also added 2 additional key fobs. (See installers check list, Item D).”

Please see Exhibit E: Email of October 1, 2005 of Installation Problems

“This check list goes on every job for the end user to sign. Please note the highlighted item. Please find

attached a copy of Mr. Caterbone’s final invoice in the amount of $1,021.40. This was to be paid to our

installer. He told our technician that he would send it in. (Item E) can see we performed all of our duties

as we agreed.”

Please see Exhibit A: Bankruptcy Chapter 11 Petition, Yarnell Securities is on the matrix of Creditors.

Please see Exhibit B: Bankruptcy Chapte11 Appeal Judge Anita Brody Appeal Response.

Please see Exhibit C: Bankruptcy Chapter 11 Definition and Regulations.


80

“We clearly state on our contracts that the customer provides the phone lines. (Item A paragraphs 7 and

8) We also offer alternate methods of communication for all of our systems. (Cellular Back Up) (Internet

Monitoring). These were refused. See Item B highlighted item.”

Please refer to Exhibit D: Verizon Duplicate Bill for phone number 717-872-6984 which was a dedicated

land line for the security system.

“Attached is a printout showing that the system was tested and working properly. Our contracts clearly

state providing a phone line is the responsibility of Mr. Caterbone. Mr. Caterbone’s system was

completed September 30, 2005 and as of this date we still have not been paid the balance of his monies

due.”

Above paragraph is not contested.

Mr. Caterbone has the system. We provided the complete installation in a timely fashion. Mr. Caterbone

has been called numerous times to collect the balance due. We provided more than 8 hours of labor at

Mr. Caterbone residence, as well the equipment with a normal selling price of over $1800.00 plus the

extra he received. Your help would be greatly appreciated.

Please see Exhibit A: Bankruptcy Chapter 11 Petition, Yarnell Securities is on the matrix of Creditors.

Please see Exhibit B: Bankruptcy Chapte11 Appeal Judge Anita Brody Appeal Response.

Please see Exhibit C: Bankruptcy Chapter 11 Definition and Regulations.

In paragraph 8. of the Residential Sales/Service Agreement it states: there will be no monitoring…..if the

telephone line is interrupted unless the customer elects to pay for additional technology that will report

such an interruption.

Upon the execution and installation of agreement, I was told that a dedicated telephone line was required

so that any interruption with phone service would be detected. Why would you pay for a Security

System with alarms and a monitoring system that contained all of the technological advances if it was

vulnerable to someone snipping your phone line outside of your house, and negating that Security

System as moot?

I wonder if all of the customers for Yarnell Security Systems are aware of this vulnerability.


81

In addition, I was billed for monitoring my security system up to April 3, when in fact my dedicated phone

line with Verizon was terminated on or before December 24, 2005.

And you told me on the telephone in our conversation that this is not fraud?

You see, I have issues with Office of the Attorney General that date back to 1987 that I am trying to

resolve in Federal Court, and must assume that you are retaliating against me for my filing of certain

Federal Civil Actions, which are now currently being litigated in the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

I do not appreciate your tone, nor do I appreciate your accusations or demands. I agreed to provide the

commitment documents to you as a courtesy. As stated, the 302 document was not in the paperwork

received from the Chief. Although additional documents are expected from my client, I have no obligation

at this stage of litigation to provide any documents to you. Given your attitude, I am not inclined to extend

you any additional courtesies.

June 20, 2006 Hearing East Lampeter Prelim Hearing Docket No. CF-0000169-06 02-3-02 MDJ

Commins - On June 19, found that someone hacked my computer and removed my scheduled

appointment for the Hearing with District Justice Commins the following day on June 20th. The

appointment schedule was apparently removed soon after I entered it. I always look forward to calendar

schedule, and would have naturally been preparing days before Hearing. Then went to file and found

that someone removed important documents required for Hearing, from my office. I immediately

called Honorable Justice Commins at 2:25 pm. And asked for a continuance due to the fact that I had

no time to prepare. She told me she could not and would address it at the Hearing at 10:30am. Arrived

and requested to get a copy of my file from District Justice Staff. All witnesses from the Prosecution

were present and called into courtroom about 30 minutes before me with other people), which I was not

aware of. Did not know what type of hearing I was having. Kept asking for an explanation.

Approximately 11:15 am - Hearing started by Honorable Commins with a woman Prosecutor (Said she

was from Lancaster District Attorney Office Ms. Mazzouri?) on opposing desk. I immediately moved for

a motion for a continuance due to the above, and the District Justice declined, and I asked what the

proceeding was, and she said "we will begin this proceeding, Prosecutor call your first witness". Thought

it was like last arraignment on December 5 in Magisterial District Justice Reuter, just Officer Bezzerd and

me. Had to cross witnesses with no time to prepare. Could not raise concern that the Affidavit of

Probable Cause was changed on May 18, 2006 and quite different from original Affidavit of October


82

2005. (See in Original Complaint File Attachments). 2 Witnesses lied extensively, and kept looking to

prosecuter for direction. One witness lied so maliciously and testified under oath that I said "I wish

George Bush and all the Marines would Die” Did not know what to do, interrupted the hearing and

asked the judge what was going on, almost walked out of courtroom, because I was so upset. A subject

matter that I am very passionate and knowledgable about, the War in Iraq and the Troops - always

trying to educate so people would at least support the troops. Ordered case moved to and signed Bail

Bond and received official notice for an Arraignment in Lancaster County Courthouse on July 26,

2006..................

June 21, 2006 - SRP Officer said could not get a copy of files after asking Office Manager - wanted me to cause

disturbance so could cite me with disorderly conduct or get another 302 She was abusive, kept trying to get me

mad with back talk and kept telling me it will cost me for citations, I would have to pay whether in Bankruptcy or not.

Said will call when files are copied.

June 22, 2006 - Digital Cable went down at 3:00 am when trying to complete Brief for Chapter 11 Motion to

Convert Order. Comcast later said it was a system glitch, returned service on Friday, June 23 at 6:00pm.

June 23, 2006 - Lancaster City Bicycle Cop Said I went through stop sign, he was baiting me as I drove

by him in alley street, would not ride near curb Did not run stop sign Would not give me a document for

subpoena, staffer kept giving me a hard time as usual, would not give me instructions in writing, told me

to put it in writing, no instructions, with fee for service, I said Informa Pauperis, she said give it to judge, I

said what am I suppose to write? Judge came out and said do you want to speak with me, I'm sick of

you insulting my staff, I said lets go. Gave me a lecture on insulting her staff, bit my tongue, asked for a

doc or if I could use PA Rules, said "this is the way we do things in my office" I said PA Rules governs

her office, she said no. I walked out.

June 27, 2006 – Pennsylvania State Police; Trooper David “Huanis”, Forensic Unit; 717-290-1976; Was

referred by Southern Regional Police Department during the response to my call in the morning of June

24, 2006; said he could not provide me the service; no one will come and fingerprint my office or

residence. Regardless of all of the complaints and responses by law authorities, no one will process any

procedure that would result in prosecution. I contain video surveillance of perpetrator in my residence,

and evidence of forced entry.


83


84

7. HAVE YOU FILED A COMPLAINT ABOUT THIS MATTER WITH ANY OTHER AGENCY? YES NO YES

IF SO, PLEASE SPECIFY WHICH ONE(S) AND THE DATE YOU FILED, TO THE BEST OF YOUR RECOLLECTION. PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL – JULY 1987 PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 29, 1987 (INTERVIEW WITH AGENT HOWARD EISLER IN MY RESIDENCE AND RECORDED WITH PERMISSION) PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE – JULY 1987 PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING AND FINANCE AGENCY NOVEMBER 1987 AND OCTOBER 2005 PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD – COMPLAINT NO. 2006-214;215 MAY 2006 MEETING AND EMAIL TO CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL MR. JOSEPH MASSEY

8. HAVE YOU FILED ANY COURT ACTIONS IN THIS MATTER? YES NO YES

IF SO, PLEASE SPECIFY IN WHAT COURT AND THE DATE YOU FILED, TO THE BEST OF YOUR RECOLLECTION. United State District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvania 05-2288 - May 16, 2005 CATERBONE v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON ET AL; 06-1538 – June 8, 2005 CATERBONE v. FULTON BANK United States Bankruptcy Court Eastern District; 05-23059 – May 23, 2005 PETITION FOR CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY Pennsylvania Court of Commonwealth Pleas Lancaster County; CI – 03401 – April, 2005 CATERBONE v. SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT ET AL; CI-03349 – April, 2005 CATERBONE v. LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL ET AL;

9. IF YOU ARE REPRESENTED BY AN ATTORNEY, PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR ATTORNEY’S NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER:

Pro Se Litigant


85

10. WHAT DO YOU WANT TO SEE HAPPEN AS A RESULT OF YOUR COMPLAINT? a. Restoration of Civil Rights b. Restoration of Civil Liberties c. Protection of Right to Due Process Without Undo Influence d. Protection of Personal and Business Property e. Financial Remedies Including The Value of Stolen Property; Lost Opportunity; Lost

Business Interests f. Prosecution of Assailants and Perpetrators

11. PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR COMPLAINT INCLUDING THE DETAILS SUCH AS DATE, TIME AND

LOCATION. YOU MAY USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY. SEE ABOVE PAGES 2 TO 68

a. RETALITORY ACTIONS DUE TO THE DISCLOSURE OF ILLICIT AND ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES WITHIN INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL AND CONTROL IN JUNE OF 1987; WHICH WAS PROSECUTED AND CONVICTED IN 1991

b. RETALITORY ACTIONS FOR THE COMMUNICATIONS AND SOLICITING OF LEGAL COUNSEL TO MS. CHRISTINA RAINVILLE IN NOVEMBER OF 1997 FOR THE ABOVE MATTERS OUTLINED IN STATEMENT NUMBERED a.

c. RETALITORY ACTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF AN AFFIDAVIT TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE STEWAR DALZALL OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN 1998 DURING THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA V. LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT CASE

PLEASE WRITE OR TYPE CLEARLY AND DESCRIBE THE EVENTS IN THE ORDER IN WHICH THEY HAPPENED. SEE ABOVE PAGES 2 TO 68 IF YOUR COMPLAINT IS BASED ON RACE, INCLUDE THE RACE OF ALL PERSONS MENTIONED (INCLUDING YOURSELF). IF IT IS A GENDER COMPLAINT, SUPPLY THE GENDER OF ALL PERSONS MENTIONED, ETC. IF THERE ARE OTHER FACTS YOU FEEL SHOULD BE CONSIDERED, RECORD THEM ON AN ADDITIONAL SHEET OF PAPER AND INCLUDE THEM WITH THIS COMPLAINT FORM. SEE DOCUMENT TITLED DEBTOR ANSWER TO UNITED STATES TRUSTEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR CONVERT TO CHAPTER 7; JUNE 2006 SEE DOCUMENT TITLED PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO FULTON BANK’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EX PARTE MEETING WITH THE HONORABLE MARY A. McLaughlin; JUNE 2006 SEE CD ROM TITLED EXHIBIT A DOCUMENTS OF INTEREST 1991 2006 PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT FINDINGS OF FACTS STANLEY J. CATERBONE v. SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT ET AL; APRIL 2006 STANLEY J. CATERBONE v. LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL ET AL; APRIL 2006


86

I HEREBY VERIFY THAT THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS COMPLAINT ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF. I UNDERSTAND THAT FALSE STATEMENTS HERIN ARE MADE SUBJECT TO THE PENALTIES OF 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904, RELATING TO UNSWORN FALSIFICATION TO AUTHORITIES. _____________/SJC/____________ June 27, 2006___________ YOUR SIGNATURE DATE PLEASE NOTE: YOU MAY NEED TO CONTACT A LAWYER SINCE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CANNOT ACT AS YOUR PRIVATE LAWYER. As a law enforcement agency, the primary function of the Attorney General is to represent the public at large by enforcing laws prohibiting acts of discrimination where there is a pattern or practice of unlawful activity. Your complaint does remain on file with our office and the Information contained in it may be used to establish future violations of Pennsylvania law or other issues of general public importance.

REVISED JANUARY 2005


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


STANLEY J. CATERBONE, Plaintiff

v. No. 05-CV-2288 LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED STONE HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT, AVALON POLICE DEPARTMENT, COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK (LC. MELLON BANK), SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, FULTON BANK

Defendant

PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO FULTON BANK’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EX PARTE MEETING WITH THE HONORABLE MARY A. McLAUGHLIN

FULTON BANK RESPONSE

Defendant, Fulton Bank, by and through its attorneys, Barley Snyder, LLC, hereby files the

following Response in opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Ex Parte Meeting with the Honorable

Mary A. McLaughlin: On or about June 2,2006, Plaintiff filed a Motion requesting an ex parte

meeting with the Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin "to discuss the problems of preceding, this

action without obstruction of justice; and to amend the original complaint as discussed

previously." See Plaintiffs Motion. However, Plaintiff provides no justification whatsoever for

his request for an ex parte meeting with the Court. Rather, Plaintiff apparently labors under

the false assumption that by proceeding pro se he is absolved of all responsibility to comply

with the rules. Such is not the case. The fact that Plaintiff decided to be his own lawyer does

not excuse him from following the rules of civil procedure or entitle him to any particular


Compaq_Owner

Confidential

Confidential Page 2 6/12/2006

advantage for lack of legal training. "The right of self-representation is not a license to abuse

the dignity of the courtroom. Neither is it a license not to comply with relevant rules of

procedural and substantive law." Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806,834 n. 46,95 S.Ct.

2525,2541 n. 46,45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975).

In the instant case, Plaintiff has no greater right to be heard than he would have if he were

represented by counsel. As a pro se litigant, Plaintiff, in essence, stands in the place of an

attorney. Plaintiffs request for an ex parte meeting with the Court in this case violates Rule

3.5(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct because it is clear that Plaintiff seeks to influence

the Court with his version of events, without providing defense counsel any opportunity to

respond.' Since an ex parte meeting with the Court would violate the Rules of Professional

Conduct and provide Plaintiff an unfair advantage over Defendants, Plaintiffs request for

such a meeting should be refused.

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

The following is copy of an Affidavit that was filed on January 31, 1998 in the chambers of

Honorable Stewart Dalzell in a desperate attempt for due process of the issues contained

herein. In November of 1997 the PLAINTIFF sought the counsel of Ms. Christina Rainville

while employed by the firm of Schnader, Harrison, Segal and Lewis. This was the last

attempt by the PLAINTIFF of seeking competent legal counsel. Ms. Rainville acknowledged

and communicated to the PLAINTIFF that the firm had barred her from representing any

additional clients from Lancaster County shortly after the PLAINTIFF’s solicitation; which she

had plenty of solicitations from other potential Lancaster County clients. In the document

titled “Plaintiff Finding of Facts” it is clearly documented that the PLAINTIFF did attempt to

solicit and retain several competent lawyers since 1987, all of who displayed conflicts of

interests, and some went so far as to violate rules of ethics concerning client/attorney

privilege. PLAINTIFF’s filing as Pro Se Litigant was the only alternative available that would

protect and preserve the PLAINTIFF’s legal standing and right to due process. The following

excerpt from the Affidavit will demonstrate to the court a factual account of the events that

precluded and provided the Plaintiff the legal standing to file the original complaint on May

16, 2005.



AFFIDAVIT OF 1998 TO HONORABLE JUDGE STEWART DALZELL

“I, Stanley J. Caterbone being duly sworn according to law, make the following affidavit

concerning the years during which I was maliciously and purposefully mentally abused,

subjected to a massive array of prosecutorial misconduct, while enduring an exhaustive

fight for the sovereignty of my constitutional rights, shareholder rights, civil liberties, and

right of due access to the law. I will detail a deliberate attempt on my life, in 1991, exhibiting

the dire consequences of this complaint. These allegations are substantiated through a

preponderance of evidence including but not limited to over 10,000 documents, over 50

hours of recorded conversations, transcripts, and archived on several digital mediums. A

“Findings of Facts” is attached herewith providing merits and the facts pertaining to this

affidavit. These issues and incidents identified herein have attempted to conceal my

disclosures of International Signal & Control, Plc. However, the merits of the violations

contained in this affidavit will be proven incidental to the existence of any conspiracy.

The plaintiff protests the courts for all remedial actions mandated by law. Financial

considerations would exceed $1 million.

These violations began on June 23, 1987 while I was a resident and business owner in

Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, and have continued to the present. These issues are a

direct consequence of my public disclosure of fraud within International Signal & Control,

Plc., of County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, which were in compliance with federal and state

statutes governing my shareholder rights granted in 1983, when I purchased my interests in

International Signal & Control., Plc.. I will also prove intentional undo influence against

family and friends towards compromising the credibility of myself, with malicious and self-

serving accusations of “insanity”. I conclude that the courts must provide me with fair

access to the law, and most certainly, the process must void any technical

deficiencies found in this filing as being material to the conclusions. Such arrogance

by the Courts would only challenge the judicial integrity of our Constitution.”



1. The activities contained herein may raise the argument of fair disclosure regarding the

scope of law pertaining to issues and activities compromising the National Security of the

United States. The Plaintiff will successfully argue that due to the criminal record of

International Signal & Control, including the illegal transfer of arms and technologies to an

end user Iraq, the laws of disclosure must be forfeited by virtue that “said activities posed

a direct compromise to the National Security of the United States”.; the plaintiff will argue

that his public allegations of misconduct within the operations of International Signal &

Control, Plc., as early as June of 1987 ;demonstrated actions were proven to protect the

National Security of the United States.. The activities of International Signal & Control,

Pls., placed American troops in harms way. The plaintiff’s actions should have taken the

American troops out of harms way causing the activities of the International Signal &

Control, Plc., to cease and desist. .

All activities contained herein have greatly compromised the National Security of the

United States, and the laws of jurist prudence must apply towards the Plaintiff’s intent and

motive of protecting the rights of his fellow citizens. Had the plaintiff been protected

under the law, and subsequently had the law enforcement community of the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the County of Lancaster administer justice, United

States troops may have been taken out of harms way, as a direct result of ceasing the

operations of International Signal & Control, Plc., in as early as 1987.

2. The plaintiff will successfully prove that the following activities and the prosecutorial

misconduct were directed at intimidating the plaintiff from continuing his public

disclosures regarding illegal activities within International Signal & Control, Plc,. On June

23, 1998, International Signal & Control, Plc was negotiating for the $1.14 billion merger

with Ferranti International, of England. Such disclosures threatened the integrity of

International Signal & Control’s organization, and Mr. James Guerin himself, ,

consequently resulting in adverse financial considerations to all parties if such disclosures

provided any reason to question the integrity of the transaction, which later became the

central criminal activity in the in The United States District Court For The Eastern District

Of Pennsylvania.



3. The plaintiff will prove that undo influence was also responsible for the adverse

consequences and fabricated demise of his business enterprises and personal holdings.

The dire consequences of the plaintiff’s failed business dealings will demonstrate and

substantiate financial incentive and motive. Defendants responsible for administering

undo influence and interference in the plaintiff’s business and commercial enterprises had

financial interests. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as a taxing authority, Lancaster

County had a great investment who’s demise would facilitate grave consequences to it’s

economic development. . Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon) would have less

competition in the mortgage banking business and other financial services, violating the

lender liability laws. The Steinman Enterprise’s, Inc., would loose a pioneer in the

information technologies industries, and would protect the public domain from truthful

disclosure. The plaintiff will also provide significant evidence of said perpetrators violating

common laws governing intellectual property rights.

4. Given the plaintiff’s continued and obstructed right to due process of the law, beginning in

June of 1987 and continuing to the present, the plaintiff must be given fair access to the

law with the opportunity for any and all remedial actions required under the federal and

state statutes. The plaintiff will successfully argue his rights to the courts to rightfully

claim civil actions with regards to the totality of these activities, so described in the

following “Findings of Facts”, regardless of any statute of limitations. Given the plaintiff’s

genuine efforts for due process has been inherently and maliciously obstructed, the

courts must provide the opportunity for any and all remedial actions deserving to the

plaintiff.

5. Under current laws, the plaintiff’s intellectual capacity has been exploited as means of

discrediting the plaintiff’s disclosures and obstructing the plaintiff’s right to due process of

the law. The plaintiff has always had the proper rights under federal and state laws to

enter into contract. The logic and reason towards the plaintiff’s activities and actions are

a matter of record, demonstrated in the “Findings of Facts”, contained herein..

The plaintiff will argue and successfully prove that the inherent emotional consequences

to all of the activities contained herein have resulted in Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome.



The evidence of the stress subjected to the plaintiff, will prove to be the direct result of the

activities contained herein, rather than the exhibited behavior of any mental deficiency the

plaintiff may or may not have. The courts must provide for the proper interpretations of all

laws, irrespective of the plaintiff’s alleged intellectual capacity. The plaintiff successfully

argue that his “mental capacity” is of very little legal consequence, if any; other than in it’s

malicious representations used to diminish the credibility of the plaintiff.

6. The plaintiff will demonstrate that the following incidents of illegal prosecutions were

purposefully directed at intimidating the plaintiff from further public disclosure into the

activities of International Signal & Control, Plc., consequently obstructing the plaintiff’s

access to due process of the law. Due to the fact that these activities to which the

plaintiff’s perpetrators were protecting were illegal activities, the RICO statutes would

apply.

To this day, the plaintiff has never been convicted of any crime with the exception of 2

speeding tickets. The following report identifies 34 instances of prosecutorial misconduct

during the prosecutions and activities beginning on June 23, 1987 and continuing to

today.

7) Given the preponderance of evidence associated with this affidavit, the courts must

conclude that In The United States District Court For The Eastern District of

Pennsylvania, Federal Judge Stuart Dalzall’s findings of April 14, 1997, in the Lisa

Lambert case identifying acts of Prosecutorial Misconduct, now, by virtue of this affidavit,

now discloses evidence of a bona fide pattern of prosecutorial misconduct, in the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and in the County of Lancaster. Criminal law must now

determine if these disclosures would warrant investigations of a possible criminal

enterprise. This affidavit is of material interest to the Lambert case, for the very fact that

this affidavit compromises the very same integrity of the court, which would tip the scales

of justice even further from the peoples deserving rights..

In the truthfulness of this affidavit, The Commonwealth must concede Lisa Michelle

Lambert to balance the scales of justice, which no other act could accomplish. The



Commonwealth must yield the criminal culpability of Lisa Michelle Lambert to the superior

matter of restoring the integrity to the courts; by it’s own admission of wrongdoing,

assuring the peoples of it’s commitment to administer equalities of justice, not inequalities

of justice. Balancing the scales of justice. Anything less, would take the full scope of

jurisdiction out of the boundaries of our laws, negating our democracy and impugning the

Constitution of the United States. The plaintiff must be restored to whole.”

I was not defending the criminal culpability of Lisa Michelle Lambert, but rather assaulting

the judicial integrity of the Lancaster County Judicial System, from first-hand experience;

and making the point that such conduct eludes every major stakeholder from the truth

and justice – prosecution and defense alike.



PLAINTIFF’S REPLY

PLAINTIFF filed the original complaint on May 16, 2005 prematurely due to the undo

influence and intimidation of several DEFENDANTS’ and other persons, entities, and or

organizations; specifically the threat of a fabricated criminal prosecution. PLAINTIFF readily

recognized the deficiencies in the filing and the lack of a formal complaint (affidavit and

finding of facts only), and had repeatedly requested information and procedural guidance

from the Court during the course of time that had elapsed until the ORDER of the Honor on

January 7, 2006. This had seemed especially difficult in light of the fact that the original filing

was sealed. In 1998 PLAINTIFF stated to the courts the following: “I conclude that the

courts must provide me with fair access to the law, and most certainly, the process

must void any technical deficiencies found in this filing as being material to the

conclusions. Such arrogance by the Courts would only challenge the judicial integrity

of our Constitution”. PLAINTIFF acknowledges that the preceding statement contains an

emotional response to the situation, and readily requests that the Court interprets the legal

intention and merits of the PLAINTIFF’s request for a fair and reasonable access to the Court

to hear and adjudicate the PLAINTIFF’s complaint.

PLAINTIFF has filed numerous formal complaints with the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s

Internet Crime Complaint Center. Those complaints identified as; I05120608348825 ;

I05120804514805; and I06010506177009. Additionally complaints were filed with the

Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga, and the Lancaster County District

Attorney’s Office with Chief Detective Michael J. Landis during the course of the last 2 years,

where the PLAINTIFF’S computer and online broadband connections was hacked. At times

when PLAINTIFF attempted to search and find Rules of Civil Procedure (Federal and

Pennsylvania) and related subject matters, including but not limited to the effective service

for DEFENDANTS, certain provisions were missing and or replaced with erroneous and

misinformation, thus resulting in an improper Certificate of Service and violation of the Rules

of Civil Procedure relating to the Service of the complaint.

Plaintiff deliberately provided no response to all previous Motions to Dismiss filed by several

DEFENDANTS due to the vagueness of the ORDER of January 7, 2006 instructing the

PLAINTIFF to only serve all DEFENDANTS with the complaint. That ORDER stated: “IT IS



HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiff shall serve the summons and complaint on or

before January 25, 2006. If the plaintiff does not do so, the Court will dismiss the

complaint without prejudice. The Court will consider the plaintiff's request to amend

the complaint and for a hearing after the summons and complaint are served”.

The court provided not instructions or demands of the PLAINTIFF to proceed with any

additional motions, responses, and or replies after the effectively serving the original

complaint to all of the DEFENDANTS. PLAINTIFF will argue that continuing with litigating

the original complaint bears no purpose, nor serves any interests of the Court in providing

the PLAINTIFF with due process and access to the Courts due to the fact that the original

complaint was not appropriately formulated to ensure that the PLAINTIFF’S allegations of

misconduct and violations of Federal Law were constructed sufficiently for the Court.

PLAINTIFF, on June 2, 2006, appropriately and formally requested that meeting with the

Court to amend the original complaint in the “Motion for Ex Parte Meeting with the Honorable

Mary A. McLaughlin”.

PLAINTIFF seeks no advantage, special treatment, nor special considerations from the

Court. PLAINTIFF is seeking the ex parte meeting for procedural guidance to amend the

original complaint and to address the ramifications of the sealing of the complaint with

special regards to issues of National Security and documented and factual threats on the

PLAINTIFF’s life . The following is the excerpt from the PLAINTIFF’s Finding of Facts:

“June 11, 1991 - Stan Caterbone left the Stone Harbor Marina at approximately 12:30 am en route to

Lancaster, Pa, to retrieve some files concerning the ISC cover-up. Upon driving north on Route 47

(the normal route to Lancaster), approximately 10 miles outside the Cape May county Courthouse,

Stan Caterbone noticed a car following him closely. Suspicious, Stan Caterbone decreased his speed

from 55 mph to 35 mph, in order for the car to pass him. However, the car remained directly behind,

adjusting the speed accordingly. In an effort to elude the car, without raising suspicion, Stan

Caterbone gradually increased his speed, while also increasing the distance between the cars,

resulting in the loss of his taillights to the ensuing vehicle - Because of the winding road, Stan

Caterbone looked for an abrupt turn-off, in hopes of dashing the eluding vehicle, by loosing sight of



his taillights. There was little or no traffic on the route during the early morning hours, and Stan

Caterbone stopped at an intersection, and noticed that the headlights of the ensuing vehicle were not

visible in his rear view mirror, meaning that his taillights were also not visible to the ensuing vehicle.

Immediately upon pulling from the intersection, Stan Caterbone noticed a narrow dirt road that lead

into a field of small trees, the perfect place to sit for the ensuing auto to pass him, unnoticed. The

ensuing vehicle pulled to the intersection, and continued north on route 47, in the direction of

Lancaster. Stan Caterbone sat in his vehicle a few minutes, until continuing on his travel, north on

Route 47. Approximately five (5) minutes later, a car traveling in excess of SS mph, approached Stan

Caterbone, traveling south on the same road (2 lanes) As the two cars approached each other, and

approximately 30 yards from reaching each other, the approaching vehicle drove directly into the lane

of Stan Caterbone, with its high beams on, and continued straight for his vehicle, or what appeared to

be a head-on-collision. Stan Caterbone drove off of the berm of the road, missing a line of trees by

less than 12 inches (eluding a life threatening disaster), and passed the vehicle that was still in the

northbound lane, heading south. Stan Caterbone, shaking and sweating furiously, noticed the cars

brake lights go on, and the car apparently turned around, and began pursuing Stan Caterbone again.

Stan Caterbone drove as fast as he could to Route 55, hoping to find traffic in order to hide and loose

the pursuing car. Stan Caterbone arrived in Lancaster, at approximately 3:00 am, and again noticed a

car sitting in the parking lot of the vacant "Sportsman's Den", at the intersection of the New Danville

Pike and Prince Streets. Upon driving west on Hershey Avenue, Stan Caterbone noticed the car

following him. In an effort to identify the license plate, Stan Caterbone made a few turns in the area of

Hamilton Watch, and followed the car heading north on S. West End Avenue. The car was a late

model, gold or tan, Cougar or possibly a Buick Park Avenue. Stan Caterbone watched the car

increase his speed, and finally changed directions and proceeded to his residence, and parked a few

blocks away, and walked through the woods, to his apartment in the Hershey Heritage complex. Stan

Caterbone then used a flashlight, in order not to reveal his presence, and returned to his vehicle,

sometime in the early morning, during daylight.



WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group respectfully requests

that Plaintiffs Motion for Ex Parte Meeting with the Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin be

affirmed.

Respectfully submitted,

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant Dated: June 9, 2006 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 174516 717-431-8184 717-427-1821 facsimile [email protected] www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

.




STANLEY J. CATERBONE, Plaintiff v. No. 05-CV-2288 LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED STONE HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT, AVALON POLICE DEPARTMENT, COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK (LC. MELLON BANK), SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, FULTON BANK Defendant

ORDER AND NOW, this - day of ,2006, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Motion for Ex Parte Meeting with the Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin, and Fulton Bank's response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED AND DECREED that the Motion is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT: ________________________________ Mary A. McLaughlin, J.



CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Reply to Response to Motion for Ex Parte Meeting has been served this 12th day of June, 2006, by first class mail, Postage prepaid, upon: Michael Donahue Harbor Police Administration Building 9508 2nd Avenue Stone Harbor. NJ 08247 Stephen Basse, Esquire Stuart A. Weiss, Esquire 817 East Landis Avenue George M. Gowen, 111, Esquire Vineland, NJ 08360 Cozen O'Connor

1900 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 1 9103

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Reply to Response to Motion for Ex Parte Meeting has been served in person to the offices below on this 12th day of June ,2006,: Howard L. Kelin, Esquire George T. Brubaker, Esquire Kegel, Kelin, Almy & Grimm Hartman, Underhill & Brubaker, LLP 24 North Lime Street 221 East Chestnut Street Lancaster, PA 17602 Lancaster, PA 17602 Sfephanie Carfley, Esquire Attorneys for Defendant Fulton Bank 126 East King Street Lancaster, PA 17602-2893 (717) 299-5201

Respectfully submitted,

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant Dated: June 9, 2006 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 174516 717-431-8184 717-427-1821 facsimile [email protected] www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com


1

Local Bankruptcy Form 9014-3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT


In Re: Chapter 11 : Stanley J. Caterbone, : NO. 05-23059-TMT

Debtor :

DEBTOR ANSWER TO UNITED STATES TRUSTEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR CONVERT TO CHAPTER 7

TRUSTEE REPRESENTATIONS: The United States trustee for Region 3, in furtherance of the administrative

responsibilities imposed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 586(a), hereby moves,

pursuant to U.S.C. 5 11 12(b), for the entry of an order dismissing this case, or

converting this case to one under Chapter 7. In support of her motion, the United

States trustee represents as follows:

1. The Debtor commenced this case on May 23,2005, by filing a voluntary

petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

2. The Debtor's case has now been pending before this Court under Chapter

11 for over one year and the Debtor has failed to file and/or obtain

approval of a disclosure statement an/or confirmation of a plan of

reorganization.

3. The Debtor has also failed to remain current with the filing of the monthly:

operating income and expense reports required pursuant to the U. S.


2

trustee Operating Guideline and LBR 201 5.1. To date, reports for the

months of February through April 2006, are past due. Further, the report

for the month of May will be due prior to the hearing on the present

Motion.

4. Upon information and belief, the Debtor has also failed to remain current

with the payment of his post-petition obligations including, but not

necessarily limited to the payment of statutory fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

1930(a)(6). The U. S. Trustee is unable to determine the exact amount

due and owing given the Debtor's failure to file the required reports as set

forth above.

5. The Debtor's failure and apparent inability to obtain confirmation of any

Plan of Reorganization, and his apparent inability to remain current with

his post-petition obligations may evidence a continuing loss to or

diminution of the Debtor's estate, the absence of a reasonable likelihood

of rehabilitation, and the Debtor's inability to effectuate a plan of

reorganization, and may constitute unreasonable delay by the Debtor

which is prejudicial to creditors, all of which are grounds for conversion

or dismissal of this case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 9 11 12(b).

For the reasons set forth above, among others, the U. S. trustee respectfully

requests that the Court conduct a hearing on the above issues and dismiss

this case, or convert it to Chapter 7. If the case is dismissed and any quarterly

fees remain due and owing at the time of the hearing on this matter, the U. S.

trustee requests that the Court enter a judgment order against the Debtor and

in favor of the United States trustee in the amount of all accrued fees owed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 4 1930(a)(6) as of the hearing date. The U. S. trustee

specifically reserves the right to supplement her motion at or prior to the

hearing thereon.


3

DEBTOR ANSWER TO TRUSTEE REPRESENTATIONS:

1. The Debtor commenced this case on May 23,2005, by filing a voluntary

petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, as Pro

Se. On June 13, 2005, the United States Bankruptcy Court filed an

ORDER to DISMISS the case on the grounds that timely documents were

not filed by the DEBTOR. On June 20, 2005, the DEBTOR filed a

response and appeal to that ORDER stating that The DEBTOR filed the

required documents to Hugh J. Ward, Bankruptcy Analyst, of the United

States Department of Justice, Office of the United States Trustee, Eastern

District Court of Pennsylvania, 833 Chestnut Street, Suite 300,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107; at the request of Mr. Hugh Ward. On

October 7th, 2005, The Honorable Judge Anita Brody of The United

States District Court For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, filed an

APPEAL ORDER that the United States Bankruptcy Court REINSTATE

the case and OVERULE the ORDER of Judge Theodore Twardowski on

June 13, 2005 that had the case DISMISSED. The case was reinstated in

November of 2005.

2. On December 15th, 2005, the DEBTOR appeared for a 3 41(a) Meeting of

Creditors in the 3rd Floor Conference Room in the Reading Bankruptcy

Court with Hugh J. Ward, Bankruptcy Analyst, of the United States

Department of Justice, presiding. In that meeting the DEBTOR was asked

when he would be able to submit a plan of reorganization, as required.

The DEBTOR answered and restated his initial reason for filing the

Bankruptcy Petition; the issues were defined and described in the Federal

Civil Action No. 05-2288 (submitted to the Bankruptcy Court and recorded

as a related document on or about November 8, 2005 titled “FINDING OF

FACTS RESULTING IN CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY”), filed on May 16,


4

2005 in The United States District Court For the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania; one week prior to filing a voluntary petition under Chapter

11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The DEBTOR articulated that

he was waiting to amend the complaint and could not file a plan of

reorganization until the Honorable Judge Mary McLaughlin of the United

States District Court For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania responded to

a request. On January 7th, 2006 The Honorable Judge Mary McLaughlin

ORDERED (Exhibit A) the DEBTOR serve the DEFENDANTS the initial

complaint and “The Court will consider the DEBTOR's request to

amend the complaint and for a hearing after the summons and

complaint are served”. On June 19, 2006, the DEBTOR was granted

as stated “1) the request shall be deemed a motion to file an

amended complaint; and 2) the motion is GRANTED”. See Exhibit B.

3. On January 24, 2006 Fulton Bank filed a Motion for Relief from Automatic

Stay Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 362 and Bankruptcy Rule 9014. On

April 8th, 2006 the DEBTOR filed an appeal to the ORDER granting Fulton

Bank Relief From The Automatic Stay. On June 8, 2006 in THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA In the matter of: STANLEY J.

CATERBONE CA 06-1538 filed a “REPLY BRIEF OF THE FULTON

BANK’S ANSWER TO APPEAL” and is awaiting a decision from the

Honorable Judge Anita Brody (See Exhibit C). Fulton Bank is a

DEFENDANT in the Federal Civil Action No. 05-2288, and is accused of

wrongdoing that has material impact to the DEBTOR’s financial hardship

and the filing of this case.

4. The Debtor was forced into filing a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of

the United States Bankruptcy Code, as Pro Se due to the following

mitigating circumstances as defined and recorded in Federal Civil Action

No. 05-2288:


5

a. The following is copy of an Affidavit that was filed on January 31,

1998 in the chambers of Honorable Stewart Dalzell in a desperate

attempt for due process. In November of 1997 the DEBTOR

sought the counsel of Ms. Christina Rainville while employed by the

firm of Schnader, Harrison, Segal and Lewis. This was the last

attempt by the DEBTOR of seeking competent legal counsel. Ms.

Rainville acknowledged and communicated to the DEBTOR that

the firm had barred her from representing any additional clients

from Lancaster County shortly after the DEBTOR’s solicitation;

which she had plenty of solicitations from other potential Lancaster

County clients. In the document titled “DEBTOR Finding of Facts” it

is clearly documented that the DEBTOR did attempt to solicit and

retain several competent lawyers since 1987, all of who displayed

conflicts of interests, and some went so far as to violate rules of

ethics concerning client/attorney privilege. The DEBTOR made

attempts for due process at various times during the past 19 years.

The DEBTOR’s filing as Pro Se Litigant was the only alternative

available that would protect and preserve the DEBTOR’s legal

standing and right to due process. The following excerpt from the

Affidavit will demonstrate to the court a factual account of the

events that precluded and provided the DEBTOR the legal standing

to file the Federal Civil Action No. 05-2288 on May 16, 2005.

b. AFFIDAVIT OF 1998 TO HONORABLE JUDGE STEWART

DALZELL “I, Stanley J. Caterbone being duly sworn according

to law, make the following affidavit concerning the years

during which I was maliciously and purposefully mentally

abused, subjected to a massive array of prosecutorial

misconduct, while enduring an exhaustive fight for the

sovereignty of my constitutional rights, shareholder rights,

civil liberties, and right of due access to the law. I will detail a

deliberate attempt on my life, in 1991, exhibiting the dire


6

consequences of this complaint. These allegations are

substantiated through a preponderance of evidence including

but not limited to over 10,000 documents, over 50 hours of

recorded conversations, transcripts, and archived on several

digital mediums. A “Findings of Facts” is attached herewith

providing merits and the facts pertaining to this affidavit.

These issues and incidents identified herein have attempted to

conceal my disclosures of International Signal & Control, Plc.

However, the merits of the violations contained in this affidavit

will be proven incidental to the existence of any conspiracy.

These violations began on June 23, 1987 while I was a resident

and business owner in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, and

have continued to the present. These issues are a direct

consequence of my public disclosure of fraud within

International Signal & Control, Plc., of County of Lancaster,

Pennsylvania, which were in compliance with federal and state

statutes governing my shareholder rights granted in 1983,

when I purchased my interests in International Signal &

Control., Plc.. I will also prove intentional undo influence

against family and friends towards compromising the

credibility of myself, with malicious and self-serving

accusations of “insanity”. I conclude that the courts must

provide me with fair access to the law, and most certainly, the

process must void any technical deficiencies found in this

filing as being material to the conclusions. Such arrogance by

the Courts would only challenge the judicial integrity of our

Constitution.”

c. The activities contained in the “FINDING OF FACTS RESULTING

IN CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY” may raise the argument of fair

disclosure regarding the scope of law pertaining to issues and

activities compromising the National Security of the United States.


7

The DEBTOR can successfully argue that due to the criminal

record of International Signal & Control, including the illegal transfer

of arms and technologies to an end user Iraq, the laws of disclosure

must be forfeited by virtue that “said activities posed a direct

compromise to the National Security of the United States”.; the

DEBTOR will argue that his public allegations of misconduct within

the operations of International Signal & Control, Plc., as early as

June of 1987 resulted in a massive array of retaliation and

discrimination towards the DEBTOR’S reputation, businesses, and

all related financial, personal and business affairs. Stock holdings in

the following interests were diminished as a direct result; Financial

Management Ltd., FMG Advisory Ltd., and Advanced Media Group

Ltd.

d. The DEBTOR can successfully prove that the following activities

and the prosecutorial misconduct were directed at intimidating the

DEBTOR from continuing his public disclosures regarding illegal

activities within International Signal & Control, Plc,. On June 23,

1998, International Signal & Control, Plc. was negotiating for the

$1.14 billion merger with Ferranti International, of England. Such

disclosures threatened the integrity of International Signal &

Control’s organization, and Mr. James Guerin himself,

consequently resulting in adverse financial considerations to all

parties if such disclosures provided any reason to question the

integrity of the transaction, which later became the central criminal

activity in the in The United States District Court For The Eastern

District Of Pennsylvania. The DEBTOR is also filing a Federal

False Claims Act, described as follows: “The whistleblower

receives a percentage of any money the government recovers.

This is done under the qui tam provisions of the Federal False

Claims Act. The whistleblower (known as a qui tam relater)

files a lawsuit. The U.S. Department of Justice has 60 days to


8

investigate the claim and decide whether it will join in the legal

action. If the government joins the lawsuit, the whistleblower

can receive between 15 and 25 percent of the recovery

depending on the value of the information provided. Similar

laws exist in Florida and other states.”

e. The DEBTOR can prove that undo influence was also responsible

for the adverse consequences and fabricated demise of his

business enterprises and personal holdings. The dire

consequences of the DEBTOR’s failed business dealings (which

were few and far between) will demonstrate and substantiate

financial incentive and motive. Defendants responsible for

administering undo influence and interference in the DEBTOR’s

business and commercial enterprises had financial interests. The

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as a taxing authority and

Lancaster County-at-large had a great investment in International

Signal & Control, Plc., whose demise would facilitate grave

consequences to its economic development. . Commonwealth

National Bank (Mellon), Fulton Bank, Farmers First Bank, and

Hamilton Bank (All had commercial interests with the DEBTOR)

would have less competition in the mortgage banking business and

other financial services, violating the lender liability laws and were

unjustly enriched. The Steinman Enterprise’s, Inc., (Lancaster

Newspapers) was a competitor in the information technologies

business, and would protect the public domain from truthful

disclosure though it’s undo influence. The DEBTOR can also

provide significant evidence of said perpetrators violating common

laws governing intellectual property rights and anti-trust regulations.

f. Given the DEBTOR’s continued and obstructed right to due

process of the law, beginning in June of 1987 and continuing to the


9

present, the DEBTOR must be given fair access to the law with the

opportunity for any and all remedial actions required under the

federal and state statutes. The DEBTOR can successfully argue

his rights to the courts to rightfully claim civil actions with regards to

the totality of these activities, so described in the “FINDING OF

FACTS RESULTING IN CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY”, regardless

of any statute of limitations. Given the DEBTOR’s genuine efforts

for due process has been inherently and maliciously obstructed, the

courts must provide the opportunity for any and all remedial actions

deserving to the DEBTOR must be preserved, thus extending to

this case.

g. Under current laws, the DEBTOR’s intellectual capacity has been

exploited and fabricated as a means of discrediting the DEBTOR’s

disclosures and obstructing the DEBTOR’s right to due process of

the law. The DEBTOR has always had the proper rights under

federal and state laws to file claims for slander, libel, and

defamation of character. The logic and reason towards the

DEBTOR’s activities and actions are a matter of record,

demonstrated in the “Findings of Facts”, contained herein. The

DEBTOR can demonstrate that the incidents of illegal prosecutions

were purposefully directed at intimidating the DEBTOR from further

public disclosure into the activities of International Signal & Control,

Plc., consequently obstructing the DEBTOR’s access to due

process of the law. Due to the fact that these activities to which the

DEBTOR’s perpetrators were protecting were illegal activities, the

RICO statutes would apply.

h. To this day, the DEBTOR has never been convicted of any crime

with the exception of 2 speeding tickets. The “FINDING OF FACTS

RESULTING IN CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY” identifies 34 (not

including instances from 1998 to the present) instances of


10

prosecutorial misconduct during the prosecutions and activities

beginning on June 23, 1987 and continuing to today.

5. The Debtor filed all required reports for the months of February through

April 2006 on June 6, 2006. The Debtor has filed numerous complaints

with several law enforcement authorities as to hacking and sabotaging of

the Debtors computer and Internet technologies that are required for this

case and all other civil actions in Federal and State courts. These

incidents were directly relating to the delaying of the DEBTOR filing the

requirements on a timely basis. Several complaints were filed with the

Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Internet Fraud Unit; Those complaints

identified as; I05120608348825; I05120804514805; and

I06010506177009. The Debtor also filed claims with Harleysville

Insurance Company Claim No. 654619 of Policy No. HOA 193468

pertaining to the damaging and theft of computer equipment. These

activities were also reported to the Southern Regional Police Department

of Conestoga, Pennsylvania. The DEBTOR has also had several files and

documents stolen and taken from his possession causing numerous

problems and delays with this and other litigation matters. These activities

were reported to the Southern Regional Police Department, the Manor

Township Police Department, of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, and the

Millersville Borough Police Department of Millersville, Pennsylvania.

6. The DEBTOR had left two (2) checks, drawn on his Ameritrade Money

Market Account, at the offices of The United States Trustee, Eastern

District Court of Pennsylvania, 833 Chestnut Street, Suite 300,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107; for the payment of fees to the United

States Trustee. Those checks, which had sufficient funds, were not

deposited as required, and Mr. Hugh Ward provided reasons that were not

verified. Since that time, because of the delays, and the unwillingness of

certain persons and companies to pay the DEBTOR certain financial

obligations, the DEBTOR has exhausted his cash holdings. This can be


11

ascertained by the granting of the Informa Pauperis GRANTED by the

Berks County Court of Common Pleas. See Exhibit D.

7. The DEBTOR has had numerous fabricated criminal charges from the

Southern Regional Police Department and the East Lampeter Police

which were in retaliation for the DEBTOR’s civil actions filed in Federal

and State Courts; and as a means to disrupt and delay this case and other

civil actions. The DEBTOR is seeking remedial actions in both Federal

and State courts pertaining to prosecutorial misconduct and other related

causes of actions from the Southern Regional Police Department and

Lancaster General Hospital.

8. The DEBTOR has several DEFENDANTS that are in DEFAULT in the

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas that JUDGEMETENTS will include

financial claims that are yet to be collected.

9. The DEBTOR will file the required report for the month of May prior to the

hearing on the present Motion.

The DEBTOR has suffered extensive financial hardship due to circumstances

and wrongdoing promulgated and executed by others beginning and continuing

from 1987. The preceding extenuating circumstances and a predatory

environment of discrimination has left the DEBTOR indigent. The DEBTOR’s

resume and capabilities statement (Exhibit E) clearly demonstrates the DEBTOR

has been successful and profitable when these efforts are minimal. The

DEBTOR also has demonstrated his expertise in the areas of interest that the

Advanced Media Group has pursued.

The DEBTOR has finally entered these allegations and claims in the Federal

Courts, after an exhausting effort. The DEBTOR is seeking financial remedies

and intends to cure all of the outstanding debts of the CREDITORS as soon as

possible, in full. It would be unfair, and would place the DEBTOR in severe

hardship if the Bankruptcy Court did not consider the totality of the DEBTOR’s

mitigating circumstances pertaining to the filing of a plan of reorganization. The


12

DEBTOR has requested several meetings with Hugh J. Ward, Bankruptcy

Analyst, of the United States Department of Justice, and the Bankruptcy Court to

cure this deficiency, with no avail.

The DEBTOR seeks the necessary time to address these deficiencies while

the Federal and State claims are fairly and properly adjudicated and financial

remedies are enforced.

The DEBTOR has also included a CD ROM disc that contains all supporting

documents and related materials to support the “FINDING OF FACTS

RESULTING IN CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY”.

JUDGMENT AGAINST DEBTOR AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE should be DENIED. DATED: June 22, 2006 ________________________________

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant Advanced Media Group

Dated: June 9, 2006 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 174516 717-431-8184 717-427-1821 facsimile [email protected] www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com


13


U.S. Bankruptcy Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Reading)

The Madison, Suite 300 400 Washington Street Reading, PA 19601 Bankruptcy Petition #: 05-23059-tmt

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 19516 SSN: xxx-xx-0959 Debtor Answer To United States Trustee's Motion To Dismiss Or Convert To Chapter 7 Service To: Mr. Hugh Ward Department of Justice Office of the Trustee 833 Chestnut Street, Suite 500 Philadelphia, PA 19107 Fax: 215-597-5795 Dave P. Adams Department of Justice Office of the Trustee 833 Chestnut Street, Suite 500 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 Fax: 215-597-5795 Certificates of Service were sent by 1st class United States mail on June 22, 2006. By, _____________________________ Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516 [email protected] 717-431-8184 phone 717-427-1621 facsimile


14

EXHIBIT A


SN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STANLEY J. CATERBONE

v. JAN: : 6 2006

LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, $'c&& NO. 05-2288

ORDER

---- AND NOW, this 5th day of January, ~FOG, upon-- -- -

consideration of the plaintiff's December 17, 2005 letter to the

Court requesting to amend the complaint and for a hearing, whereas

the complaint was filed and summons were issued to the pro se

plaintiff on May 16, 2005, and whereas the plaintiff has not served

the summons and complaint within 120 days after filing the - - , . .. . . . , - . ... ' . . . . . , . . . .

complaint, as required by ~ u l e 41m) if the ~eheral ~ u l k of Civil - Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiff shall serve the

summons and complaint on or before January 25, 2006. If the

plaintiff does not do so, the Court will dismiss the complaint

without prejudice. The Court will consider the plaintiff's request

to amend the complaint and for a hearing after the summons and

complaint are served.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion t o

file the complaint under seal (Docket No. 2) is DENIED. A dacument

in a civil action may be filed under seal only if the action is

brought pursuant to a federal statute that prescribes the sealing

of the record, or where good cause is established. +@i',,,,


5.1.5 (a) (1) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure; Pansv v. Borough

of Stroudsburg, 23 F.3d 772, 786 (3d Cir. 1994). The party seeking

confidentiality may establish good cause by showing that disclosure

will work a "clearly defined and serious injury" to that party;

"broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by specific examples or

articulated reasoning," are insufficient. Id. Even when judged by

the less stringent standards by which courts judge p~ se

pleadings, the plaintiff has not brought suit under a statute that

requires the-sealbgaf the-record, or shown -- good cause for doing - - -

so. The plaintiff alleges that several threats have been made on

his life, but does not provide any facts to support this

allegation, or explain how these alleged threats relate to his

complaint.

BY THE COURT:


15

EXHIBIT B



STANLEY J. CATERBONE CIVIL ACTION

v.

LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON. NO. 05-2288

ORDER FilEP JUN 1 9 20M

.. . . ~. .- .. . . ~~. . -~ ~ . ~ .~~ -- . .

AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2006, upon

consideration of the plaintiff's reply brief in support of his

motion for an ex parte meeting with the Court, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that, to the extent that the plaintiff is requesting

leave to file an amended complaint: 1) the request shall be

deemed a motion to file an amended complaint; and 2 ) the motion

is GRANTED. Although the Court dismissed many of the claims in

the original complaint as time-barred, and the plaintiff has not

attached a proposed amended complaint to demonstrate that he will

be able to cure the deficiencies in the original complaint, the

plaintiff is entitled to amend his pleadings once as a matter of

course before a responsive pleading is served. Fed. R. Civ. P.

15(a); Shane v. Fauver, 213 F.3d 113, 115 (3d Cir. 2000). NO

responsive pleading has yet been filed in this case.

BY TEE COURT:

JUN 1 9 2006

CLERK OF C O U H ~ Advanced Media Group of 194 08/22/2007

16

EXHIBIT C


1


In the matter of: STANLEY J. CATERBONE CA 06-1538

APPELLANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE’S REPLY BRIEF OF THE FULTON BANK’S ANSWER TO APPEAL

DATED: June 8, 2006 __________________________ Advanced Media Group Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516 717-431-8184 717-421-1621 Facsimile


2

I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE PER FULTON BANK On or about May 23,2005, Appellant, Stanley J. Caterbone ("Caterbone") filed a pro se

voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the

Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Reading) to Docket No. 05-23059. Appellee Fulton Bank

(“Futlon”) is the holder of a second claim against Caterbone in the Bankruptcy Case by

virtue of a Note (the “Note”) dated January 20,1995 and a Mortgage (the "Mortgage") dated

January 20, 1995 on Caterbone's property located at 220 Stone Hill Road, Township of

Conestoga, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania (the "Property"). After Caterbone failed to

make post-petition payments on the Note and Mortgage for the months of June 2005

through January 2006, Fulton filed its motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay on January

24,2006. On or about February 2, 2006, Caterbone filed Debtor's Response to Motion of

Fulton Bank for Relief from Stay, and a hearing was held on Fulton's Motion for Relief from

Stay on February 21,2006 before the Honorable Richard E. Fehling. At the hearing,

testimony was given on behalf of Fulton, and Caterbone testified on his own behalf.

Thereafter, on February 23,2006, the Bankruptcy Court issued an Order granting Fulton's

Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay and providing its basis for granting such relief. On

or about March 17,2006, Caterbone filed his Notice of Appeal with respect to the

Bankruptcy Court's February 23,2006 Order (the "Appeal"). The Appeal currently is pending

before this Court. Caterbone, after obtaining from this Court an extension of time through

May 15,2006 to file a Brief in support of his Appeal, filed a document titled "Answer to

Complaint" on May 15,2006. This Brief is submitted in opposition of Caterbone's Appeal.

II. ARGUMENT BY FULTON BANK

The Bankruptcy Court's February 23,2006 Order granting Appellee's Motion for Relief from

the Automatic Stav should be affirmed because Appellant has failed to show any clearly

erroneous findings of fact or incorrect conclusions of law by the Bankruptcy Court. Neither

of the documents Caterbone has filed in this appeal alleges, let alone establishes, that

there were any clearly erroneous findings of fact or incorrect conclusions of law by the

Bankruptcy Court, nor has Caterbone filed any designation of the issues to be presented on


3

appeal. this Court's review. As found by the Bankruptcy Court at the February 21,2006

hearing and stated in its February 23,2006 Order, Fulton established at the hearing that

Caterbone made no post-petition payments on the Mortgage since May of 2005, and

Caterbone failed to meet his burden of showing that Fulton's interests in the Property were

adequately protected. These findings of fact may not be set aside on appeal unless clearly

erroneous. See Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Rule 8013. The Bankruptcy Court's

conclusions of law set forth in the February 23,2006 Order are equally clear and concise

and are fully supported by bankruptcy law. Fulton, which had the initial burden to

demonstrate that "cause" existed for the Bankruptcy Court to grant relief, did so by

establishing that Caterbone defaulted in making post-petition mortgage payments.

February 23,2006 Order (citing In re Duoell, 235 B.R. 783,788 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1999); m,

837 F.2d 124, 128 (3rd Cir. 1988); In re Skipworth, 69 B.R. 526,527-28 (Bankr. E.D. Pa.

1987)). Then, the burden shifted to Caterbone to establish the absence of "cause", which

Caterbone may have done by showing that Fulton was adequately protected. Id. (citing m,

235 B.R. at 789; Skipworth, 69 B.R. at 527-28). Once Fulton met its initial burden by

demonstrating "cause" by virtue of Caterbone's failure to make past-petition mortgage

payments, the ultimate burden of proof on tlie issue of adequate protection under 11 U.S.C.

$362(d)(1) was on Caterbone. Id. (citing Skipworth, 69 B.R. at 528). Since Caterbone failed

to meet his burden of establishing the absence of "cause", having introduced no evidence

whatsoever of adequate protection, the Bankruptcy Court correctly found that Fulton was

entitled to an order granting its Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay with respect to the

Property.

III) APPELLANTS REPLY FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE COURT

On May 23, 2005 Appellant filed a filed a pro se voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in

the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Reading)

Docket No. 05-23059. In several filings with the Bankruptcy Court Appellant described the

circumstances, which caused the Appellant to file for Bankruptcy protection. In 1998 the

Appellant filed an affidavit with the Honorable Judge Stewart Dalzall which will clearly and

concisely explain to the Court the reason for Appellant’s Petition for Bankruptcy. The


4

Appellant wishes the Court to review this Affidavit to review the reasons for the cause of

filing for bankruptcy protection. This review of the Appellant’s history is material to the

Court’s decision in the Appeal for several reasons:

1. It will demonstrate that the Appellant has a factual accounting of events that

include misconduct and wrongdoing by the Appellee during the course of the

Appellants commercial relationship with the Appellee.

2. It will demonstrate that the Appellant’s allegations that the Appellant is

operating as a criminal enterprise as stated during testimony in the hearing

on Fulton's Motion for Relief from Stay on February 21,2006 before the

Honorable Richard E. Fehling is with merit and contains many violations with

regards to lender liability laws and statutes, and violations of anit-trust

regulations considering the Appellant’s successful operation of a mortgage

banking operation that was competitive with the Appellee’s efforts to finance

and mortgage commercial real estate properties in excess of $3 million in fair

market value.

3. It will demonstrate that the Appellant’s quest for due process and legal

remedies continue with regards to the issues raised in the Affidavit to the

Honorable Judge Stewart Dalzall.

4. It will demonstrate that the Appellant’s motion for Relief from the Automatic

Stay on January 24,2006 is a further attempt to subvert, obstruct, and divert

the Appelleants right to due process regarding the issues that continue to

harm the Appellant.

IV) AFFIDAVIT OF 1998 TO HONORABLE JUDGE STEWART DALZALL

“I, Stanley J. Caterbone being duly sworn according to law, make the following affidavit

concerning the years during which I was maliciously and purposefully mentally abused,

subjected to a massive array of prosecutorial misconduct, while enduring an exhaustive

fight for the sovereignty of my constitutional rights, shareholder rights, civil liberties, and

right of due access to the law. I will detail a deliberate attempt on my life, in 1991,


5

exhibiting the dire consequences of this complaint.. These allegations are substantiated

through a preponderance of evidence including but not limited to over 10,000 documents,

over 50 hours of recorded conversations, transcripts, and archived on several digital

mediums. A “Findings of Facts” is attached herewith providing merits and the facts

pertaining to this affidavit. These issues and incidents identified herein have attempted to

conceal my disclosures of International Signal & Control, Pls.,. However, the merits of

the violations contained in this affidavit will be proven incidental to the existence of any

conspiracy.

The plaintiff protests the courts for all remedial actions mandated by law. Financial

considerations would exceed $1 million.

These violations began on June 23, 1987 while I was a resident and business owner in

Lancaster County, Pennsylvania., and have continued to the present. These issues are a

direct consequence of my public disclosure of fraud within International Signal & Control,

Plc., of County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, which were in compliance with federal and

state statutes governing my shareholder rights granted in 1983, when I purchased my

interests in International Signal & Control., Plc.. I will also prove intentional undo influence

against family and friends towards compromising the credibility of myself, with malicious

and self-serving accusations of “insanity”. I conclude that the courts must provide me

with fair access to the law, and most certainly, the process must void any technical

deficiencies found in this filing as being material to the conclusions. Such

arrogance by the Courts would only challenge the judicial integrity of our

Constitution.

1. The activities contained herein may raise the argument of fair disclosure regarding the

scope of law pertaining to issues and activities compromising the National Security of

the United States. The Plaintiff will successfully argue that due to the criminal record of

International Signal & Control, including the illegal transfer of arms and technologies to

an end user Iraq, the laws of disclosure must be forfeited by virtue that “said activities

posed a direct compromise to the National Security of the United States”.; the plaintiff


6

will argue that his public allegations of misconduct within the operations of International

Signal & Control, Plc., as early as June of 1987 ; demonstrated actions were proven to

protect the National Security of the United States.. The activities of International Signal

& Control, Pls., placed American troops in harms way. The plaintiff’s actions should

have taken the American troops out of harms way causing the activities of the

International Signal & Control, Plc., to cease and desist. .

All activities contained herein have greatly compromised the National Security of the

United States, and the laws of jurist prudence must apply towards the Plaintiff’s intent

and motive of protecting the rights of his fellow citizens. Had the plaintiff been protected

under the law, and subsequently had the law enforcement community of the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the County of Lancaster administer justice, United

States troops may have been taken out of harms way, as a direct result of ceasing the

operations of International Signal & Control, Plc., in as early as 1987.

2. The plaintiff will successfully prove that the following activities and the prosecutorial

misconduct were directed at intimidating the plaintiff from continuing his public

disclosures regarding illegal activities within International Signal & Control, Plc,. On

June 23, 1998, International Signal & Control, Plc was negotiating for the $1.14 billion

merger with Ferranti International, of England. Such disclosures threatened the integrity

of International Signal & Control’s organization, and Mr. James Guerin himself, ,

consequently resulting in adverse financial considerations to all parties if such

disclosures provided any reason to question the integrity of the transaction, which later

became the central criminal activity in the in The United States District Court For The

Eastern District Of Pennsylvania.

3. The plaintiff will prove that undo influence was also responsible for the adverse

consequences and fabricated demise of his business enterprises and personal

holdings. The dire consequences of the plaintiff’s failed business dealings, will

demonstrate and substantiate financial incentive and motive. Defendants responsible

for administering undo influence and interference in the plaintiff’s business and


7

commercial enterprises had financial interests. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as

a taxing authority, Lancaster County had a great investment who’s demise would

facilitate grave consequences to it’s economic development. . Commonwealth National

Bank (Mellon) would have less competition in the mortgage banking business and other

financial services, violating the lender liability laws. The Steinman Enterprise’s, Inc.,

would loose a pioneer in the information technologies industries, and would protect the

public domain from truthful disclosure. The plaintiff will also provide significant evidence

of said perpetrators violating common laws governing intellectual property rights.

4. Given the plaintiff’s continued and obstructed right to due process of the law, beginning

in June of 1987 and continuing to the present, the plaintiff must be given fair access to

the law with the opportunity for any and all remedial actions required under the federal

and state statutes. The plaintiff will successfully argue his rights to the courts to

rightfully claim civil actions with regards to the totality of these activities, so described in

the following “Findings of Facts”, regardless of any statute of limitations. Given the

plaintiff’s genuine efforts for due process has been inherently and maliciously

obstructed, the courts must provide the opportunity for any and all remedial actions

deserving to the plaintiff.

5. Under current laws, The plaintiff’s intellectual capacity has been exploited as means of

discrediting the plaintiff’s disclosures and obstructing the plaintiff’s right to due process

of the law. The plaintiff has always had the proper rights under federal and state laws

to enter into contract. The logic and reason towards the plaintiff’s activities and actions

are a matter of record, demonstrated in the “Findings of Facts”, contained herein..

The plaintiff will argue and successfully prove that the inherent emotional consequences

to all of the activities contained herein have resulted in Post Traumatic Stress

Syndrome. The evidence of the stress subjected to the plaintiff, will prove to be the

direct result of the activities contained herein, rather than the exhibited behavior of any

mental deficiency the plaintiff may or may not have. The courts must provide for the

proper interpretations of all laws, irrespective of the plaintiff’s alleged intellectual


8

capacity. The plaintiff successfully argue that his “mental capacity” is of very little legal

consequence, if any; other than in it’s malicious representations used to diminish the

credibility of the plaintiff.

6. The plaintiff will demonstrate that the following incidents of illegal prosecutions were

purposefully directed at intimidating the plaintiff from further public disclosure into the

activities of International Signal & Control, Plc., consequently obstructing the plaintiff’s

access to due process of the law. Due to the fact that these activities to which the

plaintiff’s perpetrators were protecting were illegal activities, the RICO statutes would

apply.

To this day, the plaintiff has never been convicted of any crime with the exception of 2

speeding tickets. The following report identifies 34 instances of prosecutorial

misconduct during the prosecutions and activities beginning on June 23, 1987 and

continuing to today.

7) Given the preponderance of evidence associated with this affidavit, the courts must

conclude that In The United States District Court For The Eastern District of

Pennsylvania, Federal Judge Stuart Dalzall’s findings of April 14, 1997, in the Lisa

Lambert case identifying acts of Prosecutorial Misconduct, now, by virtue of this

affidavit, now discloses evidence of a bona fide pattern of prosecutorial misconduct, in

the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and in the County of Lancaster. Criminal law must

now determine if these disclosures would warrant investigations of a possible criminal

enterprise. This affidavit is of material interest to the Lambert case, for the very fact that

this affidavit compromises the very same integrity of the court, which would tip the

scales of justice even further from the peoples deserving rights..

In the truthfulness of this affidavit, The Commonwealth must concede Lisa Michelle

Lambert to balance the scales of justice, which no other act could accomplish. The

Commonwealth must yield the criminal culpability of Lisa Michelle Lambert to the

superior matter of restoring the integrity to the courts; by it’s own admission of


9

wrongdoing, assuring the peoples of it’s commitment to administer equalities of justice,

not inequalities of justice. Balancing the scales of justice. Anything less, would take the

full scope of jurisdiction out of the boundaries of our laws, negating our democracy and

impugning the Constitution of the United States.. The plaintiff must be restored to

whole.”

V. ALLEGATIONS OF WRONGDOING BY THE APPELLEE

1. 1987 - Libel and slander pertaining to a FULTON BANK employee (Jill Carson),

against my person while a customer of FULTON BANK that contributed to my

demise and the demise of my company and it’s subsidiaries Financial

Management Group, Ltd. A check for insurance for my plain that was posted

against my account at FULTON Bank in 1987, was intentionally and maliciously

used for a reason for the wrongful repossession by the then Commonwealth

Bank, resulting in several violations of lender liability against both FULTON

BANK and COMMONWEALTH BANK(MELLON BANK), some 30 days before

my first payment on the loan with COMMONWEALTH BANK.

2. 1990 - Diversion of funds regarding a check that was erroneously posted against

my account in 1991, that involved Mr. Hostettler, the branch manager of the

FULTON BANK branch at the Greenfield Corporate Center.

3. 1995 - The diversion of funds and extortion of funds by FULTON BANK from the

late Thomas P. Caterbone, my brother, in 1995, from his company Country

Funding, which was a primary circumstance surrounding his suicide in 1996.

4. 2006 - The undo influence of the FULTON BANK account for Tom’s Project Hope

account that I was the sole signatory and depositor of funds in 2005 by a

FULTON BANK employee or employees.

5. The diversion of funds from the Appellant by the Appellee with regards to the

purchase of a Visa Giftcard on June 1, 2006.

VI) APPELLANT’S ARGUMENT


10

The Appellant is requesting and wising the Court to ignore the Appellee’s continued

arrogance and undo influence concerning the issues that have required the Appellant to file

for bankruptcy protection in the voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the United

States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Reading) to Docket No.

05-23059. The Appellant is requesting the Court to use it’s discretionary powers to allow

the Appellant’s civil actions currently before The United States District Court For The

Eastern District Of Pennsylvania in STANLEY J. CATERBONE Plaintiff, VS. FULTON

BANK, Civil Action No: 05-2288, under the jurisdiction of the Honorable Mary A.

McLaughlin to continue without interruption and prejudice by the Appellee. By vacating the

Automatic Stay, the Court will enforce an equitable and justifiable right to due process that

the Constitution of the United States affords every citizen of this country. The Appellee’s

financial interest in the property is clearly protected by virtue of it’s 1st place lien, and the

Appellant’s continued payment of that debt would be protected if the various courts would

only uphold the Appellant’s civil rights that are afforded under the Constitution of the United

States.

VII) CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, Appellant, Stanley J. Caterbone, respectfully requests that this

Court deny the Bankruptcy Court's February 23,2006 Order granting Fulton Bank's Motion

for Relief from the Automatic Stay with respect to the Property.

DATED: June 8, 2006 __________________________ Advanced Media Group Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516 717-431-8184 717-421-1621 Facsimile


17

EXHIBIT D


COMMONWE>-LTH O F PENNSYLVPNIA : TN TEE COURT OF COHMGN PLEBS OF BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANI-Q

v s . . . Docke t No. a l e - S A - o c S 4 a d C&+W L a i\ 6

O R D E R

AND NOW, t h i s - /y'daY o f 7 ' 7 & I 2 C , 20& t h e w i t h i n P e t l t i o n t o P r o c e e d i n Forma P a u p e r i s i s

-G4&3+T-E-D-ai-Kts-tiIM&e ~ - f t & - i + - h e t U------- p r o c e e d .

0 AND NOW, t h i s - day of , a e o d t h e w i t h i n P e t i t i o n t o P r o c e e d i n Forma P a u u e r i s i s DENIED end s a i d Defendant s h a l l pay t h e f i l i n g c o s t s 2s

r e q u i r e d by t h e C le rk o f C o u r t s o f Berks County w i t h i n t h i r t y days from t h e d a t e of t h i s o r d e r .

. ..*,, 6!:Et j vi f ; ; i l Pp. Copies t o : Computer

D i s t r i c t A t t o r n e y . ~ * ; L, !.; .;; ,'$j-*-1>,

Judge 3-U: $ d . > . ~ 2 t C >

.. -- D e f e n d a n t .. . Advanced Media Group of 194 08/22/2007

18

EXHIBIT E


Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road

Conestoga, PA 17516 www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

[email protected] 717.731.8184 Phone

717.427-1621 Fax

1984 To 1987 In 1984/85 We had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Wiel, former President of Citi Group (the largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to help advise on the future of Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the investment industry at large. Mr. Weil was performing due diligence for the merger of American Express and IDS (Investors Diversified Services). We were at that time a national leader in the company in delivering Fee Based Financial Planning Services, which was a new concept in the investment community and mainstream investors. That concept is now widely held by most investment advisors. In 1985/86 We were elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4 times. We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial Planner, Ms. Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150 professionals attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work together in order to be most effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals including; brokers, lawyers, accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners, bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has become evident that financial planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us from Blue Ball National Bank to help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank. In 1985 we developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting departments. Current camps were dependant on the team scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed a strategy of video taping the camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all of the scouting departments for teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was signed at that camp by the Ottawa Roughriders of the CFL, and went on to be a leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2 years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino was starting quarterback. We were a Certified Agent for the National Football League Players Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp, while we were at a Conference for agents of the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article about our camp and associated it with other camps that were questionable about their practices. Actually, that was the very reason for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the country that were not very well organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants, with one player coming from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a professional production company filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video. The well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys, had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him and said he looked forward to reviewing the tapes for any hopeful recruits. * In 1986 We had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services


organization comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had developed a stock purchase program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new firm. FMG had financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys, realtors, liability insurance services, tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of our corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we had 24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices in Pennsylvania, and several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and our advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees from the other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at about $3 to $4 million. In 1987 We had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a major banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100 million dollars. Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations from developers across the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to raise capital that include both debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity funding through private placements, and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We had secured refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the midst of replacing the current loan that was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and discussions with Drew Anton of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We also had a number of other prominent local developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We were constantly told that our financing packages were more completive than local institutions. In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York retained me as executive producer of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format; the first of it’s kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept for the Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and marketing formula of the DOLBY technology trademark. We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording industry featuring the digital technology. Sidel,Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of Philadelphia was the lead patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station Studios was the brainchild of Tony Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was 15. Tony and Power Station Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were responsible for developing Bon Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper, Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station Studios had produced the original Sound Track for the original “Star Wars” motion picture. It was released for distribution and was the number one Sound Track recording of its time. Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We had developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the Digital Movie and it’s related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the commercialization of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry simultaneously with the release of the Digital Movie. I also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the technology, similar to the DOLBY sound system’s trademark. The acronym’s stand for the Power Station Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a portable medium, a compact disc. 1988 To 1998


In 1989 We had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with commercial companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies. I performed services and contracts for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of Standards & Technology (NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft, AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, and a host of others. I also was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing various interactive mapping technologies, which is now a major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is the premier provider of mapping software and applications for the internet and is often used in delivering maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for High Industries to sell American Helix, the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly. We had brokered a deal and the executives from Donnelly’s Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to discuss the deal and perform due diligence of the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield Industrial Park. 1990 - 1991 We had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the government’s technology think tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). I co-authored the article “Escaping the Unix Tar Pit” with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine “DISC”, then one of the leading publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy that technology whenever you call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types of applications involving telecommunications. In 1991 We were elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador Program, which was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was founded to “To give specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and effectively communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face scientific, technical, and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F. Kennedy, the State Department established a non-profit private foundation to administer the program. We were scheduled to tour the ***iet Union and Eastern Europe to discuss printing and publishing technologies with scientists and technicians around the world. 1993 To 1998 We were retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible for saving the company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts, the company was facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We were responsible for implementing computerized accounting, accounting and contract policies and procedures, human resource policies and procedures, marketing strategies, performance measurement reporting, and negotiate for the payment of unpaid contracts. The bonding company was especially problematic, since it was the lifeline to continue work and bidding for public contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County demanded a complete accounting of the operations in order to stave off a default on the notes and loans it was holding. We essentially revamped the entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its previous years, and record revenues. 1998 To PresentAdvanced Media GroupPerformed Specialized Marketing and Information Communication services to wholesale representatives of AIM Investments and Invesco reps. Opened eBay StoreCurrent Federal and State Litigation and Various Civil Actions for Personal and BusinessInterest.


COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

LANCASTER COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION

Stanley J. Caterbone Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA 17516 County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania : CIVIL ACTION NO.CI-06-03401 : CIVIL DIVISION

V. : :

Southern Regional Police Department Chief John A. Fiorill Officer Buzzer Officer Fedor Southern Regional Police Department 3284 Main Street Conestoga, PA 17516 : : STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA : : COUNTY OF LANCASTER : ss



LANCASTER COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION

COMPLAINT

1. Libel: On several occasions officers did willfully and knowingly commit acts of libel by verbally communicating and alleging plaintiff suffers from mental disorders without merit and with malice with intent to cause harm to plaintiffs reputation; cause plaintiff stress; cause harm to business affairs and to obstruct plaintiffs federal civil litigation.

2. Slander: Police Department did slander plaintiff and his business. 3. Harassment: Officers did harass plaintiff at plaintiffs home on several occasions. 4. Police Brutality: On several occasions officers did physically abuse plaintiff without

just cause and with malice. 5. Undo influence: Police Department is causing plaintiff problems and is obstructing

plaintiffs right to due process regarding his Federal Civil Action 05-2288 currently in the United States Eastern District Court of Philadelphia Pennsylvania.

6. False Imprisonment: On April 5, 2006 Officer Buzzer did knowingly and willing falsely imprison plaintiff and maliciously attack plaintiff and make false statements to authorities and to Lancaster General Hospital.

7. Officer Buser was responsible for the envelope with $750.00 cash and therefore committed a criminal offense of theft by deception.

Plaintiff seeks trial by jury and damages in excess of $10,000. Dated: April 28th, 2006 By, ________________________________ Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se

220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516 717-431-8184 717-427-1624 [email protected]

Page 1 of 1


COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

COMMON PLEAS COURT LANCASTER COUNTY


Stanley J. Caterbone represented by Stanley J. Caterbone Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road PRO SE Conestoga, PA 19516 Service To: William W. Cambell, Attorney of Record 303 West Fourth Street Quarryville, PA 17366 717-786-4044 phone 717-786-1524 facsimile For: Southern Regional Police Department

Chief John A. Fiorill Officer Buzzer Officer Fedora Southern Regional Police Department 3284 Main Street Conestoga, PA 17516

Certificates of Service were personally delivered on April 28TH , 2006. By, ________________________________ Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se

220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516 717-431-8184 717-427-1624 [email protected]



COUNTY OF LANCASTER CIVIL DIVISION

Stanley J. Caterbone Advanced Media Group : CIVIL COMPLAINT CI-06-03349 CIVIL DIVISION v. Dr. Emily Pressley, Psychiatric Department Ward 8 East Lancaster General Hospital 320 North Duke Street Lancaster. PA 17602 Lancaster General Hospital 320 North Duke Street Lancaster. PA 17602


CIVIL COMPLAINT

1. On April 5th, 2006, Defendants did falsely imprison Defendant at Approximately 3:15 EST at the emergency intake unit of the Lancaster General Hospital, Duke Street, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. 2. Upon request, Agents of the Lancaster General Hospital failed to produce any official documentation to support the apprehension of the Plaintiff or the holding of the Plaintiff in said facility. 3. Defendants did open locking cell and plaintiff gain asked for documentation, plaintiff walked out of the holding cell, and not documentation was produced, agent for defendant picked plaintiff up and literally threw plaintiff back into holding cell. 4. Between 3:30pm and 7:15pm Dr. Riley examined plaintiff by asking the following questions: a. Do you drink alcohol? b. Do you take drugs? c. May I listen to your heart and drugs? The preceding examination took under 2 minutes and was not near sufficient for

the requirements as outlined in the 302 petition, whether legal or not. 5. Mental Duress: Agents, employees, and staff of the Lancaster General Hospital did engage in planned and occasional events to inflict, cause, and provoke extreme mental duress. 6. Agents, employees, and staff did obstruct justice and cause plaintiff to suspend, neglect, and or cease all activities relating to CA 05-0288 and TMT 05-23059 in an overt

Page 1 of 2


attempt to interfere with Plaintiffs constitutional right to due process. 7. Agents, employees, and or staff did subject Plaintiff to a life threatening environment when patient William X was intentionally given a ball point pen immediately after Angela X administered a drug, and William X stood 1 foot away from Plaintiff and held ball point pen as a knife. Plaintiff had to immediately remove himself from the immediate area. Agents, employees, and or staff subjected Plaintiff to further harm by condoning and further provoking situation. As of April l0th, 2006, Plaintiff is still falsely imprisoned. 8. Agents, employees, and or staff did take from Plaintiff’s possession a white bank envelope containing Seven Hundred and Forty-Three dollars ($730.00) which was not included in Plaintiff’s Possession Form. Plaintiff requests trial by jury and seeks damages in excess of $10,000.00 Dated: April l0th, 2006 _________________________________

Stanley J. Caterbone Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro SE Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516 717-431-8184


COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMON PLEAS COURT

LANCASTER COUNTY


Stanley J. Caterbone Represented by Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Conestoga, PA 19516 717-431-8184 Phone 717-427-1621 Facsimile [email protected] Email Service To: Dr. Pressley, Psychiatrist Lancaster General Hospital 320 North Duke Street Lancaster, PA 17603 Dr. Pressley, Psychiatrist Lancaster General Hospital 320 North Duke Street Lancaster, PA 17603 Certificates of Service were delivered in person on April 27, 2006.

By, ________________________________ Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Stanley J. Caterbone


1

AMENDED COMPLAINT WIP from April 28 2006

Bill McCrakken – Harleysville Insurance Claim Tim Decker and Cats Humane League February 20, 2005 – Letter to the Editor After finding my cat killed and left by my pond: “While I was away for a family emergency, I had someone let my two cats out after being inside for a few days, which I have always done in the past. I returned after being in South Florida for one week. Upon driving toward my driveway, my one cat was anxiously awaiting my arrival. However, my second cat was not there. This was immediate cause for concern, since being mother and son, they had always stuck together. After a few days I knew that my cat was either abducted or was harmed. No way would he be around and not come home. The other evening I went over to my suspect neighbors home, whom I know often has been mischievous toward my property in the past, and asked him if he saw my cat. He went on to tell me how big my cat is and how he is the "king of the neighborhood". I found this conversation to be typical bull.... He said "don't worry it will show up soon!" Last evening I found my dead cat lying by my pond with a possum chewing on its ear. I examined the body and found that it's neck had been broken with no other signs of any other wounds. I called the Humane Shelter and talked to a Cruelty Officer who said" There is nothing we can do if you did not see anyone physically harm the animal" Is this the way it is? You have to prove a crime before they will investigate? Sounds a little backwards to me, but then again I often forget where I am at.” March 7, 2005 – Email to Dan Berger, formerly of Financial Management Group, Ltd., and brother-in-law of Honorable Lawrence Stengel, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Advanced Media Group From: [email protected] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Conversation OK, Danny, attached is the document that I had promised. As far at the other issues concerning the Middle East, here it goes. The following is a communication that was specifically for the "intelligence community". As you probably are aware, there are some 15 or more agencies that comprise that part of our government. The following paragraph was never saved as a file, the only way to authenticate the document would be to perform a forensic autopsy on the hard drive to which it was written. The document was displayed on my screen for several days. I had written the communication sometime on or around January 1, 2005. I apologize for not knowing the exact date, but I never really had any reason to resurrect it before now. By memory, the following is the communication: "We finally have an opportunity for real peace in the Middle East, and you continue to play your childish games with me. Stop collecting a paycheck and go and support our president and troops. Your efforts would be far better served. THE PEOPLE OF THIS WORLD DESERVE PEACE AND NOTHING LESS" Remember the timeline of events. The Presidential Inauguration was on January 20, and the Iraq


2

elections on January 21. I went on to expand upon that communication and told Chris Mathews during a debate (no evidence thereof) that "It is about people, not governments" hence the Inaugural speech! There, it is what it is???????” Commins Hearing Phillips Office February 2, 2005 – Phillips Office Supply, Lancaster, PA email; Advanced Media Group From: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 5:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Repair Service Center Just wondering why it takes you 8-10 days to receive whatever it is that you are waiting for when I can receive anything I want within 2-3 day! Just curious. I'll take any necessary action that is within my power and rights to provide a fair and reasonable conclusion to your attempts to humiliate and degrade me. Do you Understand! ----Original Message Follows---- From: "comments" <[email protected]> To: "Stan Caterbone" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Repair Service Center Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:37:14 –0500 Mr. Caterbone - I have researched your issue and spoke with Mr. Leonard Brown who is the Director of our Technology Service. He indicated that he talked with you last week and indicated that your issue would be resolved within 8-10 days. He explained the circumstances and informed me that you were satisfied with the resolution. Please e-mail [email protected] if this is incorrect and require me to look into this further. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Stan Caterbone [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 7:53 AM To: comments Subject: Repair Service Center And where is my facsimile machine guys? Serial Number 372122034, Sharp ux-b700. Let me see if I got this right. I dropped it off with an authorization from Sharp, the manufacturer, case no. 2214140, and you still have not repaired that machine? You had the machine how long now??? I would say about 3 weeks or longer. You know the emotional stress and duress that this causes me is about enough to constitute a very fruitful legal engagement. And especially considering that you are conducting your activities with malice. Weis Markets July 4 2006 Fiorill SRPD Lawsuit


3

Senator Specter Lancaster County In Forma Pauperis Denials Pennsylvania Housing Finance Fabricated Statement Los Cabos Hamilton Hearing Frisking, etc Lancaster City Police Littering; fabricated stop sign arrest; Citizens Bank Extortion

LIST OF ALLEGED ASSAILANTS AND PERPETRATORS Conestoga Police Department and Southern Regional Police Department; Chief Fiorill, Sgt. Robert Busser, Officer M. Fedor, Officer Rob Berger Pflumm Contractors, Inc., and employees, Millersville, PA Thomas Grassell, Conestoga, PA Wagon Wheel Restaurant, Conestoga, PA Residents of Conestoga, PA (Mr. and Mrs. Tim Decker, residents Stone Hill Road) Lancaster County District Attorney, Lancaster, PA Lancaster County Public Defender Office, Lancaster, PA Mannheim Township Police Department The Alley Kat Restaurant, Lancaster, PA Yolanda M. Caterbone, Lancaster, PA Steven P. Caterbone, Miami, Florida Michael T. Caterbone, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Phillip W. Caterbone, Austin, Texas Commonwealth National Bank (Melon Bank), Pittsburg, PA Fulton Bank, Lancaster, PA Farmers First Bank, Pete Richter, Lancaster, PA Bank of Lancaster County, Lancaster, PA Sovereign Bank, Millersville, PA Citizens Bank, Lancaster, PA St. Joseph Hospital, Regional Medical Center, Lancaster, PA Lancaster General Hospital, Dr. Emily Pressly, Dr. Bill, Employees and staff, Lancaster, PA Financial Management Group, Ltd., et al, Lancaster, PA Attilio M. Grossi, Lancaster, PA


discrimination complaint to the lancaster county human relations commission discrimination complaint...

Documents

county of lancaster

department of housing

fair housing act

equal opportunity commission

advanced media group

ordinance certain amendments

urban development

necessary authorization