discovering keystone species - hhmi biointeractive · keystone species. removal of the starfish...

1
Anemone Mussel Barnacles Algae Limpets Chitons Gooseneck barnacle Starfish Sea slug Sponge Pollicipes polymerus Semibalanus cariosus Corallina vancouveriensis Endocladia muricata Rhodomela larix Porphyra sp. Pisaster ochraceus Balanus glandula Mytilus californianus Archidoris montereyensis Anthopleura xanthogrammica Haliclona sp. Katharina tunicata Tonicella lineata Lottia scabra Lottia pelta Sea Snail Anemone Mussel Barnacles Semibalanus cariosus Balanus glandula Mytilus californianus Anthopleura xanthogrammica Gooseneck barnacle Sea slug Sponge Pollicipes polymerus Archidoris montereyensis Haliclona sp. Mussel Mytilus californianus DISCOVERING KEYSTONE SPECIES EXPERIMENT In 1963, Robert Paine embarked on a landmark experiment at the tip of the Olympic peninsula in Washington’s Mukkaw Bay. The bay features intertidal zones where members of a diverse community of invertebrates compete for resources. The concept of the experiment was simple: remove all the starfish from one area. Paine was testing the top-down view of community regulation, in which predators at the top of the pyramid limit the herbivores below them and indirectly control primary producers at the base. This was contrary to the then-popular bottom-up view, in which the availability of producers at the bottom controls the numbers of herbivores, which in turn regulates predators at the top. Mussels Mussels Mussels INTERTIDAL ZONE KEYSTONE SPECIES Removal of the starfish revealed their role in controlling species that they prey upon, which in turn had an impact on species the next level down in the food web. Paine named these strong but indirect top-down effects trophic cascades. This experiment demonstrated the importance of top-down control by the predatory starfish Pisaster ochraceus on the structure and composition of the community. When starfish were removed, the diversity of the community plummeted. Because of its large effect relative to its population size, Paine coined the term keystone species to describe species that, like the starfish, have large disproportionate impacts on their communities. BEFORE STARFISH REMOVAL h igh tide low tide FOOD WEB The food webs at the top of each panel illustrate the community as the experiment progressed. The arrows in the food webs point from the prey to the species consuming it. Starfish are predators that eat a variety of species including barnacles, chitons, limpets, and mussels, with mussels being their most important food. Organisms not directly eaten by starfish also occupied the plots: different species of algae, and a species of anemone, a sponge, and a sea slug. At the beginning of the experiment, the experimental and control plots each had 15 species. MUSSEL BOUNDARY The dashed line indicates how far down the rock face the mussel beds reached as the experiment continued. The intertidal zone is the area that is submerged at high tide and exposed at low tide. In an 8-meter-by-2-meter patch of the intertidal zone, Paine removed all of the starfish as a predator exclusion treatment. He left a similar area untouched as a control. He maintained the starfish exclusion for five years and noted changes in species diversity and abundance. 1 YEAR AFTER REMOVAL FOOD WEB In the absence of starfish predation, mussel populations exploded and outcompeted the other species. The algae, chitons, and limpets disappeared, reducing the species richness from 15 species to 8. MUSSEL BOUNDARY Mussels advanced down the rock face 67 cm from their original zone toward the low tide line. 5 YEARS AFTER FOOD WEB The mussels crowded out almost all other species. Eventually, only the mussels remained, and the community simplified from 15 species to 1. MUSSEL BOUNDARY The maximum distance mussel beds advanced was 85 cm below their original zone. Paine ended the starfish exclusion after 5 years. In the following years, the line of mussels retreated a bit, but the community remained essentially a monoculture of mussels. MUSSEL BOUNDARY Starfish REFERENCES: 1. Paine, R. T. "Food web complexity and species diversity." American Naturalist 100 (1966): 65-75., 2. Paine, R. T. "Intertidal community structure." Oecologia 15 (1974): 93-120. © 2016 Howard Hughes Medical Institute. This poster is provided free of charge by HHMI for educational purposes; the poster may not be sold or resold. All other rights reserved.

Upload: others

Post on 06-Oct-2020

30 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DISCOVERING KEYSTONE SPECIES - HHMI BioInteractive · KEYSTONE SPECIES. Removal of the starfish revealed their role in controlling species that they prey upon, which in turn had an

Anemone

Mussel

Barnacles

Algae

LimpetsChitons

Gooseneckbarnacle

Starf ish

Sea slug

SpongePol l icipespolymerus

Semibalanuscariosus

Coral l inavancouveriensis

Endocladiamuricata

Rhodomela larix Porphyra sp.

Pisaster ochraceus

Balanus glandula

Myti lus cali fornianus

Archidorismontereyensis

Anthopleuraxanthogrammica

Haliclona sp. Katharina tunicata

Tonicel la l ineata

Lot t ia scabra

Lot t ia pel ta

Sea Snail

Anemone

Mussel

Barnacles

Semibalanus cariosus Balanus glandula

Myti lus cali fornianus

Anthopleuraxanthogrammica

Gooseneckbarnacle

Sea slug

Sponge

Pol l icipespolymerus

Archidorismontereyensis

Haliclona sp.

Mussel

Myti lus cali fornianus

D I S C O V E R I N G K E Y S T O N E S P E C I E SEXPERIMENT

In 1963, Robert Paine embarked on a landmark experiment at the t ipof the Olympic peninsula in Washington’s Mukkaw Bay. The bay

features intertidal zones where members of a diverse communityof invertebrates compete for resources. The concept of the

experiment was simple: remove al l the starf ish from onearea. Paine was testing the top-down view of community

regulation, in which predators at the top of the pyramidlimit the herbivores below them and indirectly control

primary producers at the base. This was contrary tothe then-popular bottom-up view, in which the

availabil i ty of producers at the bottom controlsthe numbers of herbivores, which in turn

regulates predators at the top.

Mussels

Mussels

Mussels

INTE

RTI

DA

L Z

ON

EKEYSTONE SPECIES

Removal of the starf ish revealed their role in control l ing species that they prey upon, which in turn had an impact on species the next level down in the food web. Paine named these strong but indirect top-down effects trophic cascades.

This experiment demonstrated the importance of top-down control by the predatory starf ish Pisaster ochraceus on the structure and composition of the community. When starf ish were removed, the diversity of the community plummeted. Because of its large effect relative to its population size, Paine coined the term keystone species to describe species that, l ike the starf ish, have large disproportionate impacts on their communities.

BEFORE STARFISH REMOVAL

high tide

low tideFOOD WEB The food webs at the top of each panel i l lustrate the community as the experiment progressed. The arrows in the food webs point from the prey to the species consuming it. Starf ish are predators that eat a variety of species including barnacles, chitons, l impets, and mussels, with mussels being their most important food. Organisms not directly eaten by starf ish also occupied the plots: different species of algae, and a species of anemone, a sponge, and a sea slug. At the beginning of the experiment, the experimental and control plots each had 15 species.

MUSSEL BOUNDARY The dashed l ine indicates how far down the rock face the mussel beds reached as the experiment continued.

The intertidal zone is the area that is submerged at high tide and exposed at low tide. In an 8-meter-by-2-meter patch of the intertidal zone, Paine removed al l of the starf ish as a predator exclusion treatment. He left a similar area untouched as a control. He maintained the starf ish exclusion for f ive years and noted changes in species diversity and abundance.

1 YEAR AFTER REMOVAL

FOOD WEB In the absence of starf ish predation, mussel populations exploded and outcompeted the other species. The algae, chitons, and l impets disappeared, reducing the species richness from 15 species to 8.

MUSSEL BOUNDARY Mussels advanced down the rock face 67 cm from their original zone toward the low tide l ine.

5 YEARS AFTER

FOOD WEB The mussels crowded out almost al l other species. Eventually, only the mussels remained, and the community simplif ied from 15 species to 1.

MUSSEL BOUNDARY The maximum distance mussel beds advanced was 85 cm below their original zone.  Paine ended the starf ish exclusion after 5 years. In the fol lowing years, the l ine of mussels retreated a bit, but the community remained essential ly a monoculture of mussels.

MUSSEL BOUNDARY

Starfish

REFERENCES: 1. Paine, R. T. "Food web complexity and species diversity." American Natural ist 100 (1966): 65-75., 2. Paine, R. T. "Intertidal community structure." Oecologia 15 (1974): 93-120. © 2016 Howard Hughes Medical Institute. This poster is provided free of charge by HHMI for educational purposes; the poster may not be sold or resold. All other rights reserved.