dicing with collective urban living visions epsrc final
TRANSCRIPT
RUFkit Project Partners
• Scottish Government
• Defra
• Natural Resources Wales
• Natural England
• Landbridge
• South Downs National Park
• Malmo City Council
• Nebraska Rural Futures
Institute
• PLANED
• Staffordshire County Council
• Queen Mary Grammar School
Walsall
• Localise West Midlands
• RTPI
• Lewes Neighbourhood Plan
• David Jarvis Associates
• Salford University
• Adelaide University/ South
Australian Government
• Rural Strategy
3
Resource to Help Shape Visions and Plans • RUFshire
• Sustainability Strategies
• Regional Plan
• Economic Plan
• Neighbourhood Plan
• Rural Futures
• Urban Fringe
• Green infrastructure
• Rural Proofing
• Land Use Conflict management (A Level Geography)
• Where process of issue identification, question design and rules are just as important as the answers given
Ingredients: Design
• Defined Purpose/Goal
• Board Design
• Target groups
• Question Design
• Rules
• Outcomes
11
Ingredients : Play
• Roles
• Discussions
• Data capture and analysis
• Group Consensus vs Conflict
14
Dicing with Public(s): So What?
• Capacity to co-build dialogue
on key urban living issues
• Engagement on an even
playing field /board
• Dice sets the agenda
• Builds rapport and
understanding across usual
and non usual groups
• Power of unconventional
16
“It creates a positive atmosphere for good discussion and dialogue.”
“The complexity of the landscape is not constructed (so people come to realize how messy the urban fringe is), and yet it is an anonymous place which opens up for a more generous debate on general principles.”
“… an exercise that requires [players] to think from an interdisciplinary and less parochial perspective.”
17
Concluding Points
• RUFkit provides a flexible resource to help with
coproduction of a participatory strategy for urban living
• Process by which any vision or strategy is made is as
important as outcome
• Need to engage more public(s) in more novel and
exciting ways
• www.rufkit.org
18