determination of the influence of primary protons on the assessed neutron doses in the iss
DESCRIPTION
Determination of the influence of primary protons on the assessed neutron doses in the ISS. ID 236, Neutron Dosimetry. R J Tanner, L G Hager and J S Eakins INTS24, Bologna, September 2008. HPA PADC dosemeter & EuCPD. EuCPD. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards
Determination of the influence of primary protons on the assessed neutron doses in the ISS
R J Tanner, L G Hager and J S EakinsINTS24, Bologna, September 2008
ID 236, Neutron Dosimetry
© HPA
HPA PADC dosemeter & EuCPD
• Routine issue for neutron personal dosimetry – electrochemical etch rear face
• Calibrated for neutrons ≤ 173 MeV• Electrochemical etch produces
indistinguishable tracks for neutrons, direct protons, and heavy ions
• Forms a component of European Crew Personal Dosimeter – to assess neutron dose equivalent only
EuCPD
© HPA
Representative neutron energy distributions
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
1010
1011
Neutron energy, E (eV)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
No
rmal
ized
/l
n(E)
Ersmark calculated ISS Columbus Module
Sato calculated NASA STS shuttle
Goldhagen measured ER-2 56 g cm-2
Wilson calculated NASA STS-36
© HPA
Methods – need to get rid of the charged particles
Simple method to get neutron dose
ISSR
BNH
But, charged particles are recorded by other elements of the dosemeter – these can be detected via entry and exit tracks, NCP
ISSR
BNNH CP
© HPA
Residual range vs Emax in PADC
100 101 102 103 10410
1
102
103
104
105
Emax (MeV amu-1
)
CS
DA
ra
ng
e ( m
)
t
d
p
3He
4He
6Li7Li
9Be
12C
20Ne
Thickness of dosemeter = 500 m Can produce tracks on both faces
Cannot produce tracks on both faces
ISSR
BNNNH LIHI
If E > Emax thenLET < LETcrit
© HPA
Calculated protons inside ISS Columbus module
SAA Belt
GCR
(T Ersmark PhD thesis, June 2006, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm)
© HPA
The problem
• Need to avoid overestimates of the dose to astronauts on the ISS because a component of the reported neutron dose is due to charged particles
• A correction is required: the charged particles only exceed LETcrit near the end of their range
• A > 2 particles can be excluded by detection of entry and exit tracks
• Can estimate the number of tracks caused by protons if we know the LETcrit for protons
• Shortage of available proton beams
© HPA
Detector stack arrangement for HIMAC irradiations
Ions
• HIMAC irradiations provided data for 4He, 12C and 56Fe in May 2008
• Prior data for 20Ne
• PMMA block in the beam to ensure ions stop in the PADC stack
• Data allow etchable range of an ion to be estimated
• LETcrit can be inferred
© HPA
HIMAC 4He: 105.6 MeV into PADC
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Mea
sure
d t
rack
s, N
ne
t (cm
-2)
Distance into PADC stack, x (mm)
TRIM calculation
Measurement
• 116.8 mm PMMA
• Trim does not include air
• Straggling modelled well
2.5 m air577.14 MeV +
116.8 mm PMMA
© HPA
Rcrit
D
D = dosemeter thickness
Rcrit = etchable length of track (i.e. LET > LETcrit)
= fluence
Quoted FluenceEtchable 4He tracks
4He: Etchable range in PADC
Stack
DN
Rcrit
© HPA
HIMAC 12C: 1493 MeV into PADC
0 10 20 30 40 50
Distance into PADC stack, X (mm)
0
500
1000
1500
Net
tra
cks
cm-2
Region of mixedtrack diameters
4582 MeV 12C + 185.2 mm PMMA
© HPA
HIMAC 56Fe: 9.727 GeV into PADC
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance into PADC stack, X (mm)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Net
tra
cks
(cm
-2)
23.3 GeV 56Fe + 47.6 mm PMMA
Quoted = 5000 cm-2
Measured ~ 3900 cm-2
© HPA
LET threshold in PADC
IonEtchable track
length, LEnergy, E
(MeV)
LET∞ PADC
(keV m-1)
LET200 PADC
(keV m-1)
4He 130 µm 12.75 58 33
12C 2.9 mm 403.6 77 44
56Fe > 3 m - - > threshold
20Ne - 6020 44 25
• Uncertainties yet to be determined
• The LET for 56Fe will always be very high and will exceed the etching threshold, at any energy
• Therefore the 56Fe measurement is a measure of the total fluence
© HPA
Angle of incidence, θ vs Ep
40 60 100 200 300 400 500 600 800
Proton energy, Ep (keV)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
An
gle
of
inci
den
ce,
(°)
Minimum protontreeing energy
Maxiumum proton treeing energy
Analysis needs refinement. c is probably in the 35o – 50o range
• Envelope defines the energy range of etchable tracks
• Assume dosemeter mounted on an ICRU tissue sphere inside ISS
• Calculate tissue depth traversed to the detector surface for all incident angles
• Calculate for each , the energy range which produces etchable tracks
© HPA
Revised estimate of etchable proton tracks
p TOTAL p Etchable
Origin (cm-2 d-1) (cm-2 d-1) Ratio
SAA belt 1.24 x 105 1.79 1.44 x 10-5
GCR 5.50 x 104 0.17 3.09 x 10-6
TOTAL 1.96
1.96 cm-2 d-1 ~ 3.5 d-1 (read area = 1.767 cm2)
© HPA
Neutron dose estimateMATROSHKA 2A
Total tracks
HI(17%)
Non-HI(83%)
Protons (14%)
Neutrons(69%)
9349 1589 7760 1285 6475
Neutron tracks
Hp(10)(mSv)
EISO
(mSv)Hp(10) rate(mSv d-1)
EISO rate(mSv d-1)
6475 70.4 53.1 0.19 0.14
i.e. 31% lower than the uncorrected doses
© HPA
Summary
• The HPA PADC dosemeter can be used for the determination of the neutron dose in low earth orbit, but requires:• subtraction of high energy ions with Z>2• direct protons & -particles
• So far the assessment has considered subtraction of:• Z > 2 ions by measurement after secondary chemical
etch ~ 17%• Direct protons by calculation ~ 14%
• Still to be considered: -particles
© HPA
Future Work
• Determine experimentally the maximum proton energy threshold of detection: currently assumed 800 keV at the detector surface, equivalent to about 30 keV µm-1
• Determine experimentally the critical angle for protons as a function of energy
• Simulate the results obtained using TRIM
• Use a more realistic shape in the calculations than the ICRU sphere
• Perform a full uncertainty analysis
© HPA
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the help of:
• Tore Ersmark formerly of Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, for the calculated proton spectra
• Staff at DLR, Cologne, Germany for assistance in arranging the measurement programme
• Staff at HIMAC, Chiba, Japan for providing the irradiation facilities