determination of atenolol combinations with hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone in tablet...
TRANSCRIPT
This article was downloaded by: [Monash University Library]On: 25 September 2013, At: 09:51Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,UK
Journal of LiquidChromatographyPublication details, including instructions forauthors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ljlc19
Determination of AtenololCombinations withHydrochlorothiazide andChlorthalidone in TabletFormulations by Reverse-PhaseHPLCS. I. Sa'sa' a , I. M. Jalal b & H. S. Khalil ba Chemistry Department, Yarmouk University, Irbid,Jordanb Al-Hikma Pharmaceuticals, P. O. Box, 182400,Amman, JordanPublished online: 19 Dec 2006.
To cite this article: S. I. Sa'sa' , I. M. Jalal & H. S. Khalil (1988) Determinationof Atenolol Combinations with Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone in TabletFormulations by Reverse-Phase HPLC, Journal of Liquid Chromatography, 11:8,1673-1696
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01483918808076729
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all theinformation (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and viewsexpressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of theContent should not be relied upon and should be independently verified withprimary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for anylosses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly orindirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of theContent.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone isexpressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found athttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY, 11(8), 1673-1696 (1988)
DETERMINATION OF ATENOLOL
THIAZIDE AND CHLORTHALIDONE IN
PHASE HPLC
COMBINATIONS WITH HYDROCHLORO-
TABLET FORMULATIONS BY REVERSE-
S. I. Sa’sa’l, I. M. Jalal2, and H. S. Khali12 ]Chemistry Department
Yarmouk University Irbid, Jordan
2A Z-Hikma Pharmaceuticals P. 0. Box 182400 Amman, Jordan
AB Si’KACT
A h i g h p e r f o r m a n c e l i q u i d c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c p r o c e d u r e i s p r e s e n t e d f o r t he s i m u l t a n e o u s d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f a t e n o l o l , h y d r o c h t a b l e t s i n me i n t e r n a
p h a s e ( 5 urn)
o r o t h i a z i de, a n d c h l o r t h a l i done i n p h a r m a c e u t i c a I c o m b i n a t i o n s . An a l i q u o t o f t h e s a m p l e i s d i s s o l v e d
h a n o l c o n t a i n i n g m e t h y l p - h y d r o x y b e n z o a t e as an s t a n d a r d and c h r o m a t o g r a p h e d on a s v p e l c o s i l
LC-8-DB (250mn x 4.6mn i .d . ) c o l u m n u s i n g a m o b i l e f 1.0 amnonium a c e t a t e and 2.0 nfti o c t a n e s u l f o n i c
a c i d s o d i u m s a l t i n a c e t o n i t r i l e : w a t e r ( 2 5 : 75) s o l u t i o n , t h e pH was a d j u s t e d t o 3.5 w i t h g l a c i a l a c e t i c a c i d . The r e l a t i v e s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n s a r e l e s s t h a n i ?/J f o r t h e f i v e c o m n e r c i a l t a b l e t s a n a l y z e d . The m e t h o d was t e s t e d f o r l i n e a r i t y , r e c o v e r y , and s p e c i f i c i t y and was f o u n d t o b e f a s t , s t a b i l i t y - i n d i c a t i n g , a n d f r e e f r o m i n t e r f e r e n c e s .
1673
Copyright 0 1988 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
1674
I NTRODUCT I OM
SA’SA’, JALAL, AND KHALIL
Combina t ion t a b l e t fo rms o f a t e n o l o
h y d r o c h l o r o t h i a z i d e ( I I ) , and a t e n o l o l w i t h
( I l l ) a r e m a r k e t e d by s e v e r a l m a n u f a c t u r e r s as
a n t i h y p e r t e n s i v e drugs .
( 1 ) w i t h
h l o r t h a l i d o n e
d i u r e t i c and
A t e n o l o l i s a b e t a - a d r e n e r g i c r e c e p t o r a n t a g o n i s t .
A n a l y s i s o f a t e n o l o l has p r e v i o u s l y been d e s c r i b e d by
s p e c t r o f l u o r o m e t r i c me thod(1 ) . The method i s s i m p l e b u t c o u l d
n o t be a p p l i e d t o i t s c o m b i n a t i o n s w i t h h y d r o c h l o r o t h i a z i d e
and c h l o r t h a l i d o n e . The GLC d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f I i s s p e c i f i c
and s e n s i t i v e b u t r e q u i r e s a l e n g t h y d e r i v a t i z a t i o n s t e p (2).
t r e a
ava i
w i t h
H y d r o c h l o r o t h i a z i d e and c h l o r t h a l i d o n e a r e w i d e l y used
as d i u r e t i c s i n t h e t r e a t m e n t o f h y p e r t e n s i o n and i n t h e
ment o f c o n g e s t i v e h e a r t f a i l u r e . S e v e r a l methods a r e
a b l e f o r t h e assay o f I I a l o n e (3 -51 , o r i n c o m b i n a t i o n
o t h e r d rugs such as m e t h y l d o p a ( 6 ) , h y d r a l a z i n e ( 7 ) ,
r e s e r p i n e ( 7 , 8 ) , f u r o s e m i d e ( 9 ) , t r i m a t e r e n e ( l 0 1 , and o t h e r -
o f t h e t h i a z i d e f a m i l y ( 1 1 ) . However,
i s a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e s imu l taneous
compounds i n c o m b i n a t i o n w i t h 1 .
a n t i h y p e r t e n s i v e d rugs
none o f t h e methods
de t e r m i na t i on o f t hese
T h i s paper desc r
q u a n t i t a t i v e d e t e r m i n a
bes a r e v e r s e phase HPLC assay f o r t h e
i o n o f I, I I and I l l and some o f t h e i r
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
DETERMINATION OF ATENOLOL COMBINATIONS 1675
OH I
OCH&HCH,NHCHMe2
H CHZC NH, @ II 0
I I1
0 v
COOCH, I
OH Internal Standard
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
1676 SA’SA’, JALAL, AND KHALIL
r a l a t e d compounds 14-amino-6-chloro-l,3-benzenedisulfonamide
( I V ) and 2-(4-chloro-3-sulphamoylbenzoyl~ b e n z o i c a c i d ( V ) ! .
The assay was a p p l i e d s u c c e s s f u l l y t o f i v e comnerc ia l
p r o d u c t s and p r o v e d t o be f r e e o f i n t e r f e r e n c e s f r o m
e x c i p i e n t s n o r m a l l y used i n t a b l e t f o r m u l a t i o n s . The assay i s
f a s t s i n c e i t r e q u i r e s o n l y l i t t l e sample m a n i p u l a t i o n .
I t was a l s o v a l i d a t e d f o r p r e c i s i o n and accuracy . The
pa ramete rs i n v e s t i g a t e d i n t h i s assay i n c l u d e d a c e t o n i t r i l e
pe rcen tage , pH, and i o n i c s t r e n g t h o f t h e m o b i l e phase.
EXPERIMENTAL ------------
Appa r a t u s ---------
The a p p a r a t u s employed was a V a r i a n 2010 pump ( V a r i a n
A s s o c i a t e s , Inc . P a l o A l t o , CA, U.S.A.! equ ipped w i t h a 10-uL
l o o p i n j e c t o r model 7125 (Rheodyne, C o t a t i , Ca USA)
connected t o a V a r i a n 2050 s p e c t r o p h o t o m e t r i c d e t e c t 0 and a
V a r i a n 4290 i n t e g r a t o r . A r e v e r s e phase column(250mn x 4 . 6 m
i.d.) S u p e l c o s i l LC-8-DB (5 urn) ( s u p e l c o , Inc., Pennsy lvan ia ,
USA) was used a t ambien t t empera tu re .
Ma te r i a I s --------- The r e f e r e n c e s tandards , and t h e i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d
( m e t h y l p -hydroxybenzoate , were f r o m BP ( B r i t i s h
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
DETERMINATION OF ATENOLOL COMBINATIONS 1677
Pharmacopoeia Comni s s i o n L a b o r a t o r y , M i d d l e s e x , U.K.).
A c e t o n i t r i le-HPLC, m e t h a n o l , and g l a c i a l a c e t i c a c i d were
f r o m May & Baker L t d (Dagenham, U.K.), R iede l -de Haen AG
(West Germany) and Koch-L igh t L t d ( H a v e r h i l l , U.K.),
r e s p e c t i v e l y . h o n
a c i d sod ium s a l t
( S w i t z e r l a n d ) . Wate
um a c e t a t e purum g rade and o c t a n e s u l f o n i c
(99.0 %) were o b t a i n e d f r o m F l u k a
was a lways d i s t i l l e d and d e i o n i z e d .
E x c i p i e n t s u s u a l l y used i n the t a b l e t f o r m u l a t i o n s :
magnesium ca rbona te , p o t a t o s t a r c h , sod ium l a u r y l s u l f a t e ,
pov idone m i c r o c r y s t a l l i n e c e l l u l o s e , magnesium s t e a r a t e , and
c o l o r i n g agen ts were s u p p l i e d b y Al-Hikma P h a r m a c e u t i c a l s ,
h a n - J o r d a n . Commercial t a b l e t s were purchased l o c a l l y .
P r e p a r a t i o n o f Re fe rence D e c o m p o s i t i o n P r o d u c t s : ................................................
The d e c o m p o s i t i o n p r o d u c t s o f h y d r o c h l o r o t h i a z i d e and
c h l o r t h a l i d o n e ( I V and V) were p r e p a r e d (Scheme I) by
d i s s o l v i n g 1.0 gm o f t h e p a r e n t compound i n 30 m l o f 20 %
NaOH s o l u t i o n . The m i x t u r e s w e r e ' r e f l u x e d f o r 2 hrs, a l l o w e d
t o s t a n d f o r 20 h r s , and t h e n a c i d i f i e d t o pH 4.0 w i t h 6 N
HCI. The r e s u l t i n g p r e c i p i t a t e s were s e p a r a t e d b y vacuum
f i l t r a t i o n , washed w i t h d i s t i l l e d w a t e r , and r e c r y s t a l l i z e d
f r o m w a t e r f o r IV and m e t h a n o l : w a t e r f o r V t o a c o n s t a n t
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
1678 SA'SA', JALAL, AND KHALIL
Scheme 1
melting point. T h e identity of the products (IV and V) w a s
conf i rmed by I R and NMR.
Chromatographic Conditions: ........................... T h e m o b i l e phase consists of 1.0 nM amnonium acetate and
2.0 &I sodium octanesulfonate n acetonitri l e : water ( 2 5 : 7 5 ) ;
the pH w a s adjusted to 3.5 w th glacial acetic acid. T h e
m o b i l e phase was always filtered using 0.45 um-membrane
filters (Supelco, Inc.), and degassed by vacuum prior to use.
T h e flow rate was 1.5 mL/min. T h e wavelength w a s 254 nm and
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
DETERMINATION OF ATENOLOL COMBINATIONS 1679
t h e s e n s i t i v i t y was s e t a t 0.2 AUFS. The c h a r t speed was 0.25
cm/mi n.
S tudy I n t e r f e r e n c e s P lacebo E x c i p i e n t s - A
m i x t u r e o f t h e e x c i p i e n t s was d i s s o l v e d and t r e a t e d i n t h e
same manner as t h e sample s o l u t i o n . Ten-ul i n j e c t i o n s were
made under t h e ch romatog raph ic c o n d i t i o n s d e s c r i b e d .
I n t e r n a l S t a n d a r d S o l u t i o n - The i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d
s o l u t i o n was p r e p a r e d b y d i s s o l v i n g 1Omg o f m e t h y l p-hydroxy-
benzoa te i n 1 .O L o f me thano l .
S tandard S o l u t i o n s For L i n e a r i t y - S t a n d a r d s t o c k
s o l u t i o n c o n t a i n i n g 150.0 mg o f A t e n o l o l , 37.5 mg o f
h y d r o c h l o r o t h i a z i d e , and 37.5 mg o f c h l o r t h a l i d o n e was
p r e p a r e d i n 25 m l o f the i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d s o l u t i o n . The
f o l l o w i n g c o n c e n t r a t i o n s o f a t e n o l o l , h y d r o c h l o r o t h i a z i d e ,
and c h l o r t h a l i d o n e i n t h e i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d s o l u t i o n were
p r e p a r e d by d i l u t i o n : 5.00, 7.00, 8.00, 10.00 and 15.00,
1.25, 1.50, 2 -00 , 2.50, and 3.75 ; and 1.25, 1.50, 2.00,
2.50, and 3.75 ug / lOuL , r e s p e c t i v e l y .
A t e n o l o l and C h l o r t h a l i d o n e S t a n d a r d S o l u t i o n - One
hundred mg o f a t e n o l o l and 25.0 mg o f c h l o r t h a l i d o n e were
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
1680 SA’SA’, JALAL, AND KHALIL
d i s s o l v e d i n 25.0 rnL i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d s o l u t i o n . T h i s was
f u r t h e r d i l u t e d w i t h t h e i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d s o l u t i o n t o o b t a i n
a f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f 1.0 mg/mL and 0 .25 mg/mL,
r e s p e c t i v e l y .
H y d r o c h l o r o t h i a z i d e S t a n d a r d S o l u t i o n - Twenty f i v e mg
h y d r o c h l o r o t h i a z i d e was d i s s o l v e d i n 25 mL i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d
s o l u t i o n . T h i s was f u r t h e r d i l u t e d w i t h t h e i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d
s o l u t i o n t o o b t a i n a f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f 0 . 2 5 mg/mL.
C h l o r t h a l i d o n e S t a n d a r d S o l u t i o n - Twenty f i v e mg o f
c h l o r t h a l i d o n e was d i s s o l v e d i n 2 5 mL i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d
s o l u t i on
so I u t i on
P r epa ra t
T h i s was f u r t h e r d i l u t e d w i t h t h e i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d
t o o b t a i n a f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f 0.25 mg/mL.
on o f The Sample S o l u t i o n : ................................... Twenty t a b l e t s (one t a b l e t i f c o n t e n t u n i f o r m i i v was t o
be d e t e r m i n e d ) were we ighed and powdered. A c c u r a t e l y we ighed
p o r t i o n s o f t h e powder (each e q u i v a l e n t t o t h e w e i g h t o f one
t a b l e t ) were p l a c e d i n 2 5 rnL-vo lumet r ic f l a s k . Each sample
was s o n i c a t e d f o r t h r e e m i n u t e s w i t h 20 r L o f t h e i n t e r n a l
s t a n d a r d s o l u t i o n , t h e n comp le ted t o vo’ume w
s t a n d a r d s o l u t i o n . Samples werz f u r the r d i
i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d s o l u t i o n t o o b t a i n a concen
th t h e i n t e r n a l
u t e d w i t h t h e
r a t i o n o f 1 .OO,
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
DETERMINATION OF ATENOLOL COMBINATIONS 1681
0.25, and 0.25 mg/mL o f a i e n o l o l , h y d r o c h l o r o t h i a z i d e , and
c h l o r t h a l i d o n e . The s c ; l u t i o n s were f i l t e r e d t h r o u g h 0.45 um-
membrane f i l t e r s .
Pe rcen t Recovery S tudy - The s t u d y was p e r f o r m e d b y
p r e p a r i n g s y t h e t i c m i x u t r e s i d e n t i c a l t o t h e p h a r m a c e u t i c a l
f o r m u l d t i o n s and were s p i k e d w i t h known amounts o f
50.0, 70.0, 80.0, 100.0, 125.0, and 150.0 rng
f o l l o w i n g amounts o f h y d r o c h l o r o t h i a z i d e and c h l o r o
a teno I o I
and t h e
h a l i d o n e :
12.50, 15.00, 20.00, 25.00, 30.00, and 37.5Omg spann ing t h e
range o f SO-lSOo/o o f t h e expec ted assay va lues . The r e s u l t i n g
m i x t u r e s were assayed and t h e r e s u l t s o b t a i n e d were compared
w i t h t h e expec ted one.
Assay Method - Equa l volumes (10-uL) and a p p r o x i m a t e l y
equa l c o n c e n t r a t i o n s o f t h e s t a n d a r d and sample s o l u t i o n s
were i n j e c t e d i n t o t h e HPLC and chromatographed under t h e
c o n d i t i o n s d e s c d r i b e d above. The s t a n d a r d and t h e sample
s o l u t i o n s c o n t a i n e d t h e same c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f t h e i n t e r n a l
s tandard . The q u a n t i t y o f each component
w i t h i n t h e l i n e a r i t y range
C a l c u i a t i o E - The r e s u l t s were ca
response r a t i o s (RR) r e l a t i v e t o i n t e r n a l
peak a reas :
RRx
n j e c t e d was a lways
c u l a t e d u s i n g
s t a n d a r d based on
P e r c e n t o f t h e l a b e l c l a i m found = ---- X 100 RR s
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
1682 SA'SA', JALAL, AND KHALIL
Where RRx = sample response r a t i o ; RRs = s t a n d a r d response
r a t i o .
RESULTS AND.DISCUSSION ......................
I n o r d e r t o o p t i m i z e t h e c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c pa ramete rs , t h e
e f f e c t s o f a c e t o i t r i l e c o m p o s i t i o n , pH, and i o n i c s t r e n g t h on
t h e c a p a c i t y f a c t o r (k') were conduc ted ( F i g . 1 -3) . The
I l l , V, and t h e i n t e r n a l
ed b y t h e v a r i a t i o n o f
l e phase ( F i g . 1 ) . A t l ow
c a p a c i t y f a c t o r ( k l ) v a l u e s
s t a n d a r d were s u b s t a n t i a l
a c e t o n i t r i l e c o m p o s i t i o n i n
f o r I,
y a f f e c
t h e mob
a c e t o n i t r i l e c o n c e n t r a t i o n , kl v a l u e s were h i g h
peaks were broadened. A t h i g h a c e t o n i t r i l e c o n c e n t r a t
v a l u e s were lower w i t h s h a r p e r peaks. V a l u e s o f k l
and I V were s l i g h t l y a f f e c t e d b y a c e t o n i t r i l e compos
nd t h e
ons kl
f o r I 1
t i o n i n
the m o b i l e phase w i t h i n t e r f e r e n c e a t h i g h e r t h a n 30 %.
T h e r e r f o r e , a m o b i l e phase o f 25 96 a c e t o n i t r i l e was s e l e c t e d
s i n c e i t p r o v i d e d c o m p l e t e l y r e s o l v e d sha rp peaks w i t h i n a
reasonab le e l u t i o n t ime.
V a r i a t i o n o f pH ( F i g . 2 ) y i e l d e d c o n s i d e r a b l e change i n
k l v a l u e s o f V w h i l e i t had no e f f e c t on k l v a l u e s o f t h e
o t h e r compounds. compound V, b e i n g the o n l y c a r b o x y l i c a c i d ,
e x p l a i n s t h e c o n s i d e r a b l e i n c r e a s e i n k l upon i n c r e a s i n g
t h e pH va lue . T h i s b e h a v i o u r c o u l d be a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
DETERMINATION OF ATENOLOL COMBINATIONS 1683
16
12
10
k' 8
6
4
2
l& 2& 25% 36% 35%
CONCENTRATION OF ACETONITRILE (v/v)
F i g u r e ( 1 ) : P l o t s o f t h e c a p a c i t y f a c t o r versus t h e a c e t o n i t r i l e compostion i n t h e mobi l e phase.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
1684 SA’SA’, JALAL, AND KHALIL
12
10
8
k’ 6
4
2
Internal Standard * 0 - -
I11 I 0
3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.5
PH
F i g u r e (7) : P l o t s o f t h e c a p a c i t y f a c t o r ve rsus pH.
i n c r e a s e d s o l u b i l i t y o f a c i d a t h i g h e r pH va lues . pH 3 .5 - 4.5 c o u l d be chosen as opt imum v a l u e s f o r t h e a n a l y s i s .
However, pH 3.5 was s e l e c t e d a t w h i c h t h e i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d
e l u t e s b e f o r e compound V. There was, however, no v a r i a t i o n i n
t h e sharpness o f t h e peaks between pH 3.5 - 4.5 and no
c o n s i d e r a b l e d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e e l u t i o n t ime.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
DETERMINATION OF ATENOLOL COMBINATIONS
8 -
6 - k'
1685
( F - 1 Internal Standard - - - -
0.5 1.0 2.0
I&! OF &?&%IUh! ACETATE
F i g u r e ( 3 ) : P l o t s o f t h e c a p a c i t y f a c t o r ve rsus t h e m o l a r i t y o f amnonium a c e t a t e .
The v a r i a t i o n o f t h e i o n i c s t r e n g t h s l i g h t l y a f f e c t e d
the k l v a l u e s ( F i g . 3 ) . S a t i s f a c t o r y k f v a l u e s were
o b t a i n e d a t 1.0 rdvl amnonium a c e t a t e . A l t h o u g h t h e e f f e c t o f
amnonium a c e t a t e on k l v a l u e s i s i n s i g n i f i c a n t , y e t i t has
a c o n s i d e r a b l e e f f e c t on r e d u c i n g t h e peak t a i l i n g o f
a t e n o l o l . A l s o , t h e a d d i t i o n o f 2.0 mM o f sod ium
o c t a n e s u l f o n a t e has been f o u n d t o reduce t h e peak t a i l i n g o f
a t e n o l o l .
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
1686 SA'SA, JALAL, AND KHALIL
To d e t e r m i n e t h e l i n e a r i t y o f t h e d e t e c t o r response,
c a l i b r a t i o n s t a n d a r d s o l u t i o n s o f I, I I and I l l were p r e p a r e d
as d e s c r i b e d i n t h e t e x t . A p l o t o f peak a r e a r a t i o s ve rsus
amounts i n j e c t e d was l i n e a up t o 15.00, 3.75, and 3.75 ug,
r e s p e c t i v e l y w i t h c o r r e l a t on c o e f f i c i e n t s o f 0.999 o r b e t t e r
f o r each compound.
To d e t e r m i n e t h e accu racy o f
was s p i k e d w i t h a p l a c e b o and sub
a l i cases , s a t i s f a c t o r y r e c o v e r
t h e method, each s t a n d a r d
e c t e d t o HPLC a n a l y s i s . I n
e s and r e p r o d u c i b i I i t y o f
peak a reas were o b t a i n e d . A l i n e a r r e g r e s s i o n a n a l y s i s o f t h e
d a t a shows e x c e l l e n t c o r r e l a t i o n ove r t h e a n a l y s i s range
s t u d i e d ( T a b l e I ) . No i n t e r f e r e n c e s due t o e x c i p i e n t s were
produced. The d e t e c t i o n l i m i t s
, 1 1 , and I l l, r e s p e c t i v e l y , as
andard s o l u t i o n s w i t h me thano l
and i n j e c t i n g 10-uL o f each s o l u t i o n i n t o the column.
d e t e c t e d i n t h e chromatograms
were 200, PS, and 50 pg f o r
d e t e r m i n e d b y d i l u t i n g t h e s
The s p e c i f i c i t y o f t h e method i s i l l u s t r a t e d i n ( F i g . 4 )
where comp le te s e p a r a t i o n was n o t i c e d f o r a s y n t h e t i c m i x t u r e
o f I , I I , 1 1 1 , IV , V, and the i n t e r n a l s tandard . The r e s u l t s
o f a n a l y s i s o f f i v e c o m n e r c i a l p r o d u c t s ( T a b l e I I , F i g u r e s 5-
8 ) i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e p roposed assay can be used f o r t h e
q u a n t i t a t i o n o f I , I I , . a n d I l l i n c o m n e r c i a l samples. The
accu racy o f t h e me hod was s u p p o r t e d b y t h e c loseness o f t h e
r e s u l t s t o t h e l a b e c l a i m . The p r e c i s i o n o f t h e HPLC method
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
I t+m
-
I I I
+ED
-
Adde
dlTa
blet
Fo
und/
Tabl
et
Reco
very
Adde
dITa
blet
Fo
undl
iabl
et
Reco
very
Ad
dedI
Tabl
et
FoundITablet
Reco
very
(n
s)
(mg)
(%
) (w
) (ng)
(9q
(mp)
(n
s)
!%I
50.00
M.O
l+l.7
6 -
100.
02+1
.76
12.5
0 12
.772
1.06
10
2.1
551.
06
12.5
0 12
.47M
.37
- 99
.7e.
37
70 .00
69.8
19-3
4 99.735-34
15.0
0 15
.1ot
O.7
3 -
100.
67+0
.73
15.0
0 15
.32+
0.27
-
102.
1 3M
.27
- 80
.00
80.7
2tp.
82
10
0.~
*8
2 20.00
20.1
8+1*
81
100.
9otl
.81
- 20
.00
20.0
7+0.
60
- 10
0.35
+0.6
0
100.
00
100.
2OH
l.55
- 1
00
~~
~5
5
25.0
0 25
.01M
.62
- 10
0.04
+0.6
2 25
.OO
24
.6.2
0
98.4
q10.
20
125 .00
12
4.e
.29
99
.57+
0.29
30.00
29.6
8+0.
70
- 98
-933
l.70
30 .oo
29
.96+
0.32
-
99.8
7+0.
32
- 37
.819
.43
1 OO
.83M
.43
1500
.00
148.
86to
.27
- 99
.24s
.27
37.5
0 37
.31M
.96
- 99
.499
.96
37.5
0 -
Intercept :
1.01
82
0.48
81
- 0.0
079
Slope
: 0.
9877
0.
9794
1.
0020
R : 0.9999
0,9999
0.9996
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
1688 SA'SA', JALAL, AND KHALIL
11
F i g u r e ( 4 ) : A t y p i c a l chromatogram o f a 10-uL i n j e c t i o n o f a s y n t h e t i c m i x t u r e o f I - V and t h e i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d .
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
DETERMINATION OF ATENOLOL COMBINATIONS 1689
f ATENXCL
a Hypoz i de
b Tenoret i c
C
Esidrex
b Hygrotow-50
e Hygro tow1 00
a
100.3 + 0.04 -
100.41 2 0.55
Lot 634 (AlHikna Phamceut
Lot 1 H 323 (Imperial Chenical
Lot 006000 (CIB4 - El@' Limi
b
C
d
e
f
Lot 011m (CIW - CEIGY!
Lot 745587 (CIR4 - am)
100.82 f 0.03 -
99.27 i 0.81 -
100.06 f 0.59 -
99.83 - + 0.46
99.87 + 0.99 - -
cals - Aman - Jordan).
Industries PLC, U.K.)
ed, Basle, Ssvitzerland)
hkan 2 RSD for 3 x 6 deteminations (three sarples, six injections each).
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
1690 SA'SA', JALAL, AND KHALIL
a -
H !
1
XI
i F i g u r e ( 5 ) : a ) A t y p i c a l chromatogram o f a 10-uL i n j e c t i o n
o f a s t a n d a r d c o n t a i n i n g 2.5 u g o f I I , 18 ug o f I , and 0.1 ug o f t h e i n t e r a l s t a n d a r d ( t h e assay method p r o c e d u r e ] .
b ) A t y p i c a l chromatogrtam o f a 10-uL i n j e c t i o n o f a comnercia l p r o d u c t ( H y p o z i d e ) .
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
DETERMINATION OF ATENOLOL COMBINATIONS 1691
F i gu
- L
TIME (MIN.)
( 6 ) : a ) A t y p i c a l chromatogram o f a 10-u i n j e c t i o n o f a s t a n d a r d c o n t a i n i n g 10 u g o f I , 2.5 ug o f I I I , a n d 0.125ug o f t h e i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d .
b) A chromatogram f o r a 10-uL i n j e c t i o n o f a s o l u t i o n made o f one t a b l e t o f T e n o r e t i c ( t h e assay method p r o c e d u r e ) .
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
1 F i g u r e ( 7 ) : a ) A t y p i c a l chromatogram o f a 10-uL i n j e c t i o n
o f a s t a n d a r d c o n t a i n i n g 2.5 ug o f II and 0.1 ug o f t h e i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d .
b ! A chromatogram f o r a 10-uL i n j e c t i o n o f a s o l u t i o n made o f one t a b l e t o f E s i d r e x ( t h e assay method p r o c e d u r e ) .
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
1693 DETERMINATION OF ATENOLOL COMBINATIONS
HYGRYKN-50 HYGI#Tr(3N-100
SAMPLE m m m
8 ;r)
-c, t rn
k a, c, c H
P.1 h
r%-
b -
1
Q
C - SAMPLE -
c;
F i g u r e ( 8 ) : A t y p i c a l chromatogram o f a 10-uL i n j e c t i o n s f o r :
a ) a s t a n d a r d c o n t i n i n g 2.0 ug o f I l l and 0.1 ug o f t h e i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d .
b ) sample o f Hygroton-50.
c ) a s t a n d a r d c o n t a i n i n g 2.5 ug o f 1 1 1 and 0.1 ug o f t h e i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d .
d ) sample o f Hygroton-100.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
TABU
E (1
11)
TABL
ET No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
hlea
n m
H
i gh
LOW
a"r u
\IIFG
%lT
Y K
R I
, I I
, P
N)
1 I I
IN O
JvM
Rcl
PL TAELETS B
y W
LC.
PE
RC
EN
T
LA
BE
L
CL
AI
M
FO
UN
D(*
)
96 e4
2 10
4.62
99
.58
106.
56
98 -0
5 10
0.49
10
4.04
98
-66
94.56
103.
03
100.
30
3.44
104.6
5 97
.86
97.8
6 10
4.28
97
.89
103.
75
99.85
99
.21
100 -
63
99.8
4 10
0.59
10
0.84
100.
47
2.13
104.
28
94.5
6
98.9
8 10
0.00
10
3.48
99.86
100.
67
97.97
10
0.12
96.50
96 -7
6 10
2.12
99.6
5 2.2
1 10
3.48
96.50
96.32
97
.10
100.
32
97.4
9 98
.1 2
97.55
98
.31
96.32
96
.68
100.8
3
97.9
0 1.6
0 10
0 .83
96
.32
(*)
Each
Dat
a p
oin
t is
the
aver
age
of
tw
inje
ctio
ns)
.
100.
78
105 2
5
91.6
3 97
.14
98.1
1 10
0.12
94.58
10
5.50
97
.07
99.37
4.5
8 10
5.50
91
.63
103.
50
95.21
10
2.46
10
1.79
96
.53
94.4
8 10
0.22
97
.76
101.
47
97.45
97
.81
98.51
2.8
6 10
2.46
94
.a
100.
16
95.11
10
2.91
97.0
5 10
3.01
10
0.86
91
1.50
95.11
94
.89
95.1
1
98.2
7 3.3
4 10
3.01
94
.89
m z !b U
7c
X
9 c r
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
DETERMINATION OF ATENOLOL COMBINATIONS 1695
i s s u p p o r t e d b y t h e v e r y s m a l l r e l a t i v e s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n
(RSD) based on 3 x 6 r e a d i n g s .
The s p e c i f i c i t y o f t h e method i s f u r h t e r c o n f i r m e d b y
t h e r e s u t s o f c o n t e n t u n i f o r m i t y w h i c h show comp l iance t o
s p e c i f i c a i o n s o f a l l dosage forms and s u p p o r t t h e
s p e c i f i c i t y o f t h e HPLC r e s u l t s ( T a b l e I l l ) .
and I I I by
one mounth
t h i s p e r 0
Compound I
I n
shown
a v a i l a b
p r e c i s e
p l a c i n g sa
t h e r e s u
d w i t h o u t
I degraded
A s t a b i l i t y s t u d y was p e r f o r m e d on s tandards o f I, I I ,
p l e s i n w a t e r - g l y c e r i n b a t h a t 6OoC f o r
t s show t h a t , compound I I was s t a b l e i n
any measurab le d e g r a d a t i o n t o IV .
t o g i v e t r a c e s o f V(0.06+5.33% mg).
c o n c l u s i o n , t h e HPLC assay d e s c r i b e d h e r e has been
c o m n e r c i a l l y t o be o f g e n e r a l a p p l i c a b i l i t y t o
e p r o d u c t s . The method i s q u i t e s imp e , a c c u r a t e ,
r a p i d and easy t o p e r f o r m .
ACKNClWLEDGEMENTS
The f i n a n c i a l s u p p o r t p r o v i d e d b y Yarmouk U n i v e r s i t y ,
M i n i s t r y o f P lann ing -Jo rdan , and Al-Hikma P h a r m a c e u t i c a l s ,
h a n - J o r d a n a r e g r a t e f u l l y acknowledged. The a u t h o r s wou ld
a l s o l i k e t o thank Al-Hikma P h a r m a c e u t i c a l s f o r p r o v i d i n g t h e
raw m a t e r i a l s and s tandards .
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13
1696
REFERENCES
SA'SA, JALAL, AND KHALIL
1 . Kaye C.M., Br. J . C l i n . Pharmacol., 1, 84 (1974) .
2. Ma1 b i c a 1 .O.and Monson K.R., J .Pharm. S c i . ,*,1992( 1975).
3 . Cohen A.I., Kee le r . B.T., Coy N.H., and Y a l e H.L., Ana l . Chem., 34, 216 (1962) .
4. D e l e o A.B. and S t e r n M.J., J.Pharm. S c i . , s , 173 (1966) .
5. F a z z a r i F.R. , J . Assoc. O f f . Anal . Chem.,E, 582 (1970) .
6. Chu R., i b i d . , 54, 603 (1971) .
7. U rbany i T. and O 'Conne l l A., Anal.Chem.,44, - 565 (1972) .
8. B u t t e r f i e d A.G.,Lovering E.G.,and Sears R.W., J . Pharm. Sci . , - 67, 650 (1978) .
9. Abd ine H., E l Sayed M.A.H., and E l Sayed Y.M., J.Assoc. O f f . Ana l . Chem., 6l, 6975 (1978) .
10. Menon G.N. and W h i t e L.B., J.Pharm. S c i . , ~ , 1 0 8 3 ( 1 9 8 1 ) .
11. K k o l o s E. and Walker J.,Anal. Chem. Acta,80,117 - (1975) .
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mon
ash
Uni
vers
ity L
ibra
ry]
at 0
9:51
25
Sept
embe
r 20
13