defendant gillespie’s rule 1.150 motion to strike sham pleadings-nov-10-2015

Upload: neil-gillespie

Post on 07-Aug-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    1/56

    THIS IS NOT A COMMERCIAL FORCLOSURE

    IN THE CIRCUIT COUFIFTH JUDICIAL CIRIN AND FOR MARION

    REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.,CASE NO.: 2013-CA-0

     Plaintiff, 42-2013-CA-000115-A

    vs. Residential Home ForecHECM Reverse Mortga

     NEIL J. GILLESPIE AND MARK GILLESPIE Florida Homestead of NAS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE GILLESPIEFAMILY LIVING TRUST AGREEMENTDATED FEBRUARY 10, 1997, ET AL.

    Defendants.

     ________________________________________/

    DEFENDANT GILLESPIE’S RULE 1.150 MOTION TO STRIKE SHAM PLE November 10, 2015

    Notice of Criminal Conspiracy: Judge Stancil, Clerk Ellspermann and attorney CFla. Stat. section 777.04 Attempts, solicitation, and conspiracy

    Defendant pro se Neil J. Gillespie, henceforth in the first person, a disabled,

    indigent/insolvent non-lawyer, unable to obtain adequate counsel, a vulnerable adul

    consumer of legal and court services affecting interstate commerce, states as follow

    1. On November 9, 2015 the Marion County Clerk’s public online docket in th

    captioned case shows “Default Entered” at document no. 228, 3 pages. (Exhibit 1)

    2. The document appearing November 9, 2015 as document no. 228 at the “De

    Entered” location described in paragraph 1 appears at Exhibit 2, but does not show a

    Filing # 34264753 E-Filed 11/10/2015 10:26:06 AM

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    2/56

    DEFENDANT GILLESPIE’S RULE 1.150 MOTION TO STRIKE SHAM PLEADINGS November-10-2015

     Notice of Criminal Conspiracy: Judge Stancil, Clerk Ellspermann and attorney Curtis Wilson

    CASE NO.: 2013-CA-000115, 42-2013-CA-000115-AXXX-XX

    “Default Not Entered Against Elizabeth Bauerle [By] Motion Filed W/The C

    10/28/15 - you may Request A “Judicial” Default” followed by “NH” with aaround, and 11.9.15 below

    3. Attorney Curtis Wilson is also known as Curtis Wilson, Esq., and is also kno

    Alan Wilson, Fla. Bar No. 77669, of McCalla Raymer, LLC, and perhaps other nam

    Florida Bar attorney directory page for Curtis Alan Wilson, Fla. Bar No. 77669. (Ex

    4. The foregoing is evidence of a criminal conspiracy between Judge Hale Stan

    David R. Ellspermann and attorney Curtis Wilson a/k/a/ Curtis Alan Wilson, agains

    777, Florida Statutes, and section 777.04 Attempts, solicitation, and conspiracy.

    5. On November 6, 2015 document no. 225 appeared as a 2 page “locked” eFil

    on the Marion County Clerk’s public online docket. (Exhibit 4).

    6. On November 9, 2015 document no. 225 was not “locked” and shows “AFF

    CONSTRUCTIVE SERVICE FL BAR NO. 77669” (Unofficial Document, Exhibit

    Wilson, Esq. (but signed Curtis Wilson Nov-03-2015) also known as Curtis Alan W

    Bar No. 77669. The Unofficial Document, AFFIDAVIT OF CONSTRUCTIVE SER

    BAR NO. 77669, (Exhibit 5) states in relevant part:

    Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared, Curtis Wilson, E being duly sworn, deposes and says:

    1. Affiant is the attorney for the Plaintiff in this action. He has retainedof Provest, LLC to make diligent search and inquiry to discover the name anof UNKNOWN SETTLORS BENEFICIARIES OF THE GILLESPIE FAMLIVING TRUST AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 4, 1997, Defendant

    ti d th t f th i thi t t t ti l l i i ti t

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    3/56

    DEFENDANT GILLESPIE’S RULE 1.150 MOTION TO STRIKE SHAM PLEADINGS November-10-2015

     Notice of Criminal Conspiracy: Judge Stancil, Clerk Ellspermann and attorney Curtis Wilson

    CASE NO.: 2013-CA-000115, 42-2013-CA-000115-AXXX-XX

    7. DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO VERIFIED COMPLAINT TO FORECLOS

    EQUITY CONVERSION MORTGAGE (HECM); DEFENSES AND CLAIMS IN

    RECOUPMENT; OTHER DEFENSES; COUNTER-CLAIMS; AND CROSS-CLA

    # 23275828 E-Filed 02/03/2015 01:25:45 AM, appears as Exhibit 8, a separate 32 p

    and negates the preceding AFFIDAVIT OF CONSTRUCTIVE SERVICE FL BAR

    8. The foregoing is a continuation of the criminal conspiracy of Judge Hale Sta

    David R. Ellspermann, and attorney Curtis Wilson, a/k/a Curtis Alan Wilson, see

    DEFENDANT GILLESPIE’S RULE 1.150 MOTION TO STRIKE SHAM PLE

    Notice of Criminal Conspiracy: Judge Stancil, Clerk Ellspermann and attorney C

    RULE 1.150. SHAM PLEADINGS

    9. The “Default Entered” at document no. 228, 3 pages (Exhibit 1) is a sham pl

    must be stricken pursuant to Rule 1.150(a) Fla.R.Civ.P. The document appearing N

    2015 as document no. 228 at the “Default Entered” location does not show a default

    Instead, there is a hand-written message in the signature block for the Clerk of the C

    of the document, which is “MOTION TO DEFAULT” dated November 3, 2015 and

    Curtis Wilson, a/k/a Curtis Alan Wilson (Fla. Bar No. 77669) of McCalla Raymer, L

    33997561 E-Filed 11/03/2015 at 12:50:25 PM. The hand-written message states:

    “Default Not Entered Against Elizabeth Bauerle [By] Motion Filed W/The C10/28/15 - you may Request A “Judicial” Default” followed by “NH” with a

    around, and 11.9.15 below

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    4/56

    DEFENDANT GILLESPIE’S RULE 1.150 MOTION TO STRIKE SHAM PLEADINGS November-10-2015

     Notice of Criminal Conspiracy: Judge Stancil, Clerk Ellspermann and attorney Curtis Wilson

    CASE NO.: 2013-CA-000115, 42-2013-CA-000115-AXXX-XX

    (a) Motion to Strike. If a party deems any pleading or part thereof filed by to be a sham, that party may move to strike the pleading or part thereof befois set for trial and the court shall hear the motion, taking evidence of the resp parties, and if the motion is sustained, the pleading to which the motion is di be stricken. Default and summary judgment on the merits may be entered indiscretion of the court or the court may permit additional pleadings to be filecause shown.

    (b) Contents of Motion. The motion to strike shall be verified and shall set the facts on which the movant relies and may be supported by affidavit. No tthe motion shall be required.

    THIS IS NOT A COMMERCIAL FORCLOSURE

    10. The Civil Cover Sheet Form 1.997 in this case appears at Exhibit 6 and was

    Danielle N. Parsons, Fla. Bar # 0029364 of McCalla Raymer LLC. The Clerk’s stam

    January 9, 2013 at 12.45 PM.

    11. Counsel Parsons wrongly filed this action as a “Commercial foreclosure $5

    $249,999” shown on Form 1.997 CIVIL COVER SHEET, II. TYPE OF CASE, atta

    Verified Complaint, and signed by Plaintiff’s counsel Danielle Parsons, who represe

    “I CERTIFY that the information I have provided in this cover sheet is accu best of my knowledge and belief”.

    Counsel’s certification is a false official statement. This is a residential foreclosure.

    12. Section 837.06, Florida Statutes, governs False official statements.

    837.06 False official statements.—Whoever knowingly makes a false statemwriting with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as pr775 082 775 083

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    5/56

    DEFENDANT GILLESPIE’S RULE 1.150 MOTION TO STRIKE SHAM PLEADINGS November-10-2015

     Notice of Criminal Conspiracy: Judge Stancil, Clerk Ellspermann and attorney Curtis Wilson

    CASE NO.: 2013-CA-000115, 42-2013-CA-000115-AXXX-XX

    CERTIFY that the information I have provided in this cover sheet is accurate to the

    knowledge and belief”. Counsel’s certification is false. This properly is the homeste

    Gillespie under Section 4, Article X of the Florida Constitution. This action is a “Ho

    residential foreclosure $50,001 -$249,999”. Oak Run is a residential 55+ communit

    commercial activity is permitted. The HECM reverse mortgage was made on the res

     property. It appears counsel’s false declaration was intended to deceive the Clerk an

    that this is a commercial foreclosure, in violation of F.S. § 837.06, False official sta

    14. Clerk Ellspermann filed my residential foreclosure as a commercial foreclos

    failed to take corrective action when notified that the civil cover sheet (form 1.997)

    See, AFFIDAVIT OF NEIL J. GILLESPIE OF RESIDENTIAL HOMESTEAD, TH

    A COMMERCIAL FORCLOSURE, Filing # 23497600 E-Filed 02/07/2015 11:56:0

    15. On December 24, 2014 I notified Gregory C. Harrell, General Counsel to D

    Ellspermann, Marion County Clerk of Court & Comptroller (Exhibit 7),

    RE: Clerk’s duty and the civil cover sheet (form 1.997), Rule 1.100(c)(2).Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. vs. Neil J. Gillespie, et al., Case No. 13-11

    Dear Mr. Harrell:

    You emailed me December 09, 2014 at 4:59 PM about the civil cover sheet -The case was designated as a commercial foreclosure by plaintiff's counsel cover sheet that the plaintiff is responsible for preparing and filing at the outcase. You will need to take the matter up with the court and/or the plaintiff hdeem appropriate if you dispute the plaintiff's characterization of the case, ashas no say in that.

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    6/56

    DEFENDANT GILLESPIE’S RULE 1.150 MOTION TO STRIKE SHAM PLEADINGS November-10-2015

     Notice of Criminal Conspiracy: Judge Stancil, Clerk Ellspermann and attorney Curtis Wilson

    CASE NO.: 2013-CA-000115, 42-2013-CA-000115-AXXX-XX

    sheet is not filed, the clerk shall accept the complaint or petition for filing; b

     proceedings in the action shall be abated until a properly executed cover shecompleted and filed. The clerk shall complete the civil cover sheet for a part pro se.

    Currently the civil cover sheet (form 1.997) is not “properly executed” as cofiled. The Clerk has a ministerial duty under Rule 1.100(c)(2), “...all proceedaction shall be abated until a properly executed cover sheet is completed and

    When can I expect the Clerk to fulfill its ministerial duties under Rule 1.100

    16. Clerk Ellspermann violated the Clerk's Duties & Responsibilities found on i

    http://www.marioncountyclerk.org/index.cfm?Pg=clerksdutiesresponsibiliti

    The Clerk of Court, as an officer of the Marion County Court system, is resp

    maintaining court records with the utmost care and security. These court reccriminal felony and misdemeanor cases, civil, family, probate and small clai proceedings, juvenile cases, and traffic citations.

    Clerk Ellspermann failed in maintaining court records with the utmost care and secu

    SANCTIONS: DISMISS THE FORECLOSURE WITH PREJUDICE

    17. The Court has the inherent power to sanction perjury, misconduct and other

    Plaintiff. A plain reading of section 57.105(1) Florida Statutes shows sanctions may

    “upon the court’s initiative”.

    18. I respectfully request the Court on its own initiative to DISMISS WITH PR

    the Plaintiff’s VERIFIED COMPLAINT TO FORECLOSE HOME EQUITY CON

    MORTGAGE as a sanction imposed for perjury by Counsel Danielle N. Parsons, Es

    Prior Counsel Danielle N. Parsons, Esq. - Officer of the CourtC t C l C ti Wil Offi f th C t

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    7/56

    DEFENDANT GILLESPIE’S RULE 1.150 MOTION TO STRIKE SHAM PLEADINGS November-10-2015

     Notice of Criminal Conspiracy: Judge Stancil, Clerk Ellspermann and attorney Curtis Wilson

    CASE NO.: 2013-CA-000115, 42-2013-CA-000115-AXXX-XX

     justice, and, as such, his conduct is subject to judicial supervision and scruti

    rel. Florida Bar v. Evans, 94 So.2d 730 (1957).

    20. As attorneys, Parsons and Wilson must comply with the Rules of Profession

    including candor before the tribunal, as described in the Florida Bar Informational P

    Candor Before The Tribunal. “The lawyer's duty not to assist witnesses, including th

    own client, in offering false evidence stems from the Rules of Professional Conduct

    statutes, and caselaw.”

    Rule 4-1.2(d) prohibits the lawyer from assisting a client in conduct that the knows or reasonably should know is criminal or fraudulent.

    Rule 4-3.4(b) prohibits a lawyer from fabricating evidence or assisting a witfalsely.

    Rule 4-8.4(a) prohibits the lawyer from violating the Rules of Professional Cknowingly assisting another to do so.

    Rule 4-8.4(b) prohibits a lawyer from committing a criminal act that reflectsthe lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer.

    Rule 4-8.4(c) prohibits a lawyer from engaging in conduct involving dishone

    deceit, or misrepresentation.

    Rule 4-8.4(d) prohibits a lawyer from engaging in conduct that is prejudicialadministration of justice.

    Rule 4-1.6(b) requires a lawyer to reveal information to the extent the lawye believes necessary to prevent a client from committing a crime.

    This rule, 4-3.3(a)(2), requires a lawyer to reveal a material fact to the tribundisclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the 3.3(a)(4) prohibits a lawyer from offering false evidence and requires the law

    bl di l h f l t i l id h b ff d

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    8/56

    DEFENDANT GILLESPIE’S RULE 1.150 MOTION TO STRIKE SHAM PLEADINGS November-10-2015

     Notice of Criminal Conspiracy: Judge Stancil, Clerk Ellspermann and attorney Curtis Wilson

    CASE NO.: 2013-CA-000115, 42-2013-CA-000115-AXXX-XX

    21. Florida caselaw prohibits lawyers from presenting false testimony or eviden

    Williams, 30 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 1947), states that perpetration of a fraud is outside the

     professional duty of an attorney and no privilege attaches to communication betwee

    and a client with respect to transactions constituting the making of a false claim or t

     perpetration of a fraud. Dodd v. The Florida Bar, 118 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1960), remind

    courts are . . . dependent on members of the bar to . . . present the true facts of each

    enable the judge or the jury to [decide the facts] to which the law may be applied. W

    attorney . . . allows false testimony . . . [the attorney] . . . makes it impossible for the

     justice] to balance." See The Fla. Bar v. Agar, 394 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 1981), and The

    Simons, 391 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1980). To permit or assist a client or other witness to t

    is prohibited by F.S. § 837.02 which makes perjury in an official proceeding a felon

    F.S. § 777.011 which proscribes aiding, abetting, or counseling commission of a fel

    22. Oath of Admission to The Florida Bar. The general principles which should

    the lawyer in the practice of the legal profession are clearly set forth in the followin

    admission to the Bar, which the lawyer is sworn on admission to obey and for the w

    violation to which disbarment may be had.

    "I do solemnly swear:

    "I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of tFlorida;

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    9/56

    DEFENDANT GILLESPIE’S RULE 1.150 MOTION TO STRIKE SHAM PLEADINGS November-10-2015

     Notice of Criminal Conspiracy: Judge Stancil, Clerk Ellspermann and attorney Curtis Wilson

    CASE NO.: 2013-CA-000115, 42-2013-CA-000115-AXXX-XX

    "I will employ for the purpose of maintaining the causes confided to me suc

    as are consistent with truth and honor, and will never seek to mislead the judany artifice or false statement of fact or law;

    "I will maintain the confidence and preserve inviolate the secrets of my clienaccept no compensation in connection with their business except from them knowledge and approval;

    "To opposing parties and their counsel, I pledge fairness, integrity, and civiliin court, but also in all written and oral communications;

    "I will abstain from all offensive personality and advance no fact prejudicialor reputation of a party or witness, unless required by the justice of the causeI am charged;

    "I will never reject, from any consideration personal to myself, the cause of t

    defenseless or oppressed, or delay anyone's cause for lucre or malice. So hel

    23. Creed Of Professionalism

    I revere the law, the judicial system, and the legal profession and will at all t professional and private lives uphold the dignity and esteem of each.

    I will further my profession's devotion to public service and to the public go

    I will strictly adhere to the spirit as well as the letter of my profession's code

    the extent that the law permits and will at all times be guided by a fundamenhonor, integrity, and fair play.

    I will not knowingly misstate, distort, or improperly exaggerate any fact or owill not improperly permit my silence or inaction to mislead anyone.

    I will conduct myself to assure the just, speedy and inexpensive determinatioaction and resolution of every controversy.

    I will abstain from all rude, disruptive, disrespectful, and abusive behavior atimes act with dignity, decency, and courtesy.

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    10/56

    DEFENDANT GILLESPIE’S RULE 1.150 MOTION TO STRIKE SHAM PLEADINGS November-10-2015

     Notice of Criminal Conspiracy: Judge Stancil, Clerk Ellspermann and attorney Curtis Wilson

    CASE NO.: 2013-CA-000115, 42-2013-CA-000115-AXXX-XX

    My word is my bond.

    WHEREFORE, the Court has the inherent power to sanction perjury, miscon

    other fraud by the Plaintiff. A plain reading of section 57.105(1) Florida Statutes sho

    sanctions may be awarded “upon the court’s initiative”.

    I respectfully move the Court on its own initiative to DISMISS WITH PREJ

    the Plaintiff’s VERIFIED COMPLAINT TO FORECLOSE HOME EQUITY CON

    MORTGAGE as a sanction imposed for perjury by Counsel Danielle N. Parsons, Es

    continued by Curtis Alan Wilson.

    VERIFICATION OF NEIL J. GILLESPIE

    Under penalty of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing, and the fa

    therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

    RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED November 10, 2015.

     Neil J. Gillespie8092 SW 115th LoopOcala, Florida 34481Phone: 352-854-7807

    Email: [email protected]

    Certificate of Service I hereby certify that today November 10, 2015 I serveforgoing to the following names on the Florida E-filing Portal.

    Curtis Wilson a/k/a Curtis Alan Wilson

    https://www.civitekflorida.com/ocrs/app/caseinformation.xhtml?query=CyTsX_QZPFTZAwa

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    11/56

    NewCase Information

    422013CA000115CAA 01/09/2013 MARION Circuit Civil 37-D O

    STANCIL, HALE R JUDGE

    REVERSE

    MORTGAGE

    SOLUTIONS INC

    PLAINTIFFWILSON, CURTIS

     ALAN77669

    GILLESPIE, NEIL J DEFENDANT

    OAK RUN

    HOMEOWNERS

     ASSOCIATION

    DEFENDANT

    UNITED STATES

    OF AMERICADEFENDANT

    BAUERLE,

    ELIZABETH

    DEFENDANT

    GILLESPIE, MARK DEFENDANT CAPARAS, TIFFANY 89863

    GILLESPIE, NEIL J DEFENDANT

    DEVELOPMENT &

    CONSTRUCTION

    COR

    DEFENDANT

    GILLESPIE, JOETTA DEFENDANT

    https://www.civitekflorida.com/ocrs/app/caseinformation.xhtml?query=CyTsX_QZPFTZAwa

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    12/56

    223 11/03/2015 AFFIDAVIT OF CONSTRUCTIVE SERVICE

    218 06/18/2015 NOTICE OF FILING APPEAL TO FLORIDA SUPREME

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    13/56

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    14/56

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    15/56

    https://www.floridabar.org/wps/portal/flbar/home/attysearch/mprofile/!ut/p/a1/jc_LDoIwEAXQT-pthRaWo6mkRazx

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    16/56

    Ethics Rules

    Search The Florida Bar 

    THE FLORIDA BAR / Find A Lawyer / Profile

    Member in Good Standing Eligible to Pra

    Bar Number:Mail Add ress:

    Email:

    Personal Bar URL:

    vCard:

    County:

    Circuit:

     Admit ted:

    Young Lawyers

    Division:

    10-Year Disc ipline

    History:

    Law School:

    Firm:

    Firm Size:

    Firm Position:

    Firm Website:

    Curtis Alan Wilson

    77669225 E Robinson St Ste 660

    Orlando, FL 32801-4321

    United States

    Office: 407-674-1850 x2915

    [email protected]

    www.floridabar.org/mybarprofile/77669

    Orange

    9

    04/20/2010

    Member 

    None

    Florida Coastal School of Law, 2009

    Sections: Young Lawyers

    Federal Courts: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

    U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida

    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida

    McCalla Raymer, LLC.

    51 to 100

     Associate

    www.McCallaRaymer.com

    The Find a Lawyer directory is provided as a public serv ice. The Florida Bar maintains limited basic information about attorneys licensed to practice in the state (e

    birth, gender, law schools attended, admission year). However, through this directory The Florida Bar allows individual attorneys the opportunity to pr ovide for pu

     ABOUT THE BAR NEWS & EVENTS FOR THE PUBLIC MEMBER SERVICES LOG IN

    https://www.civitekflorida.com/ocrs/app/caseinformation.xhtml?query=CyTsX_QZPFTZAwa

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    17/56

    NewCase Information

    422013CA000115CAA 01/09/2013 MARION Circuit Civil 37-D O

    STANCIL, HALE R JUDGE

    REVERSEMORTGAGE

    SOLUTIONS INC

    PLAINTIFFWILSON, CURTIS

     ALAN77669

    GILLESPIE, NEIL J DEFENDANT

    OAK RUN

    HOMEOWNERS

     ASSOCIATION

    DEFENDANT

    UNITED STATESOF AMERICA DEFENDANT

    BAUERLE,

    ELIZABETHDEFENDANT

    GILLESPIE, MARK DEFENDANT CAPARAS, TIFFANY 89863

    GILLESPIE, NEIL J DEFENDANT

    DEVELOPMENT &

    CONSTRUCTIONCOR DEFENDANT

    GILLESPIE, JOETTA DEFENDANT

    https://www.civitekflorida.com/ocrs/app/caseinformation.xhtml?query=CyTsX_QZPFTZAwa

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    18/56

    223 11/03/2015 AFFIDAVIT OF CONSTRUCTIVE SERVICE

    218 06/18/2015 NOTICE OF FILING APPEAL TO FLORIDA SUPREME

    216 06/17/2015 NOTICE OF FILING CORRECTED ORIGINAL TRANS217 06/17/2015 TRANSCRIPT CONT - SEE DOC

    215 06/16/2015 NOTICE OF FILING CORRECTED ORIGINAL TRANS

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    19/56

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    20/56

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    21/56

    Form1.997CIVIL COVER SHEET

    The civilcoversheetand theinformationcontainedhereinneitherreplacenorsupplementthe filingand servi

    papers

    as

    required

    by

    law. Thisform s h ~ l I ~ b e . f i ~ d   by the plaintifforpetitioner for theuse of theClerkof theC

    reportingjudicialworkloaddata pursuani··t

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    22/56

    II. TYPE OF

    C SE

    (If the case

    fits

    more

    than

    one type

    of

    case, select the most definitive

    descriptive label is a subcategory (is indented under

    8

    broader category

    the main ~ t g o r y   and subcategory boxes.

    . 0... .

    \

    Condominium

    Homestead residential foreclosure $0

    Discrimination - employment

    or

    other Securities litigation

    Insurance claims

    Trade secrets

    Intel1ectual property

    Trust litigation

    III. REMEDIES SOUGHT (check

    all

    that apply):

    X monetary;

    nonmonetary declaratory

    or

    injunctive relief;

    punitive

    IV

    NUMBER OF CAUSES OF ACTION

    [

    (specify)

    IS

    THIS

    CASE A

    CL SS

    CTION

    LAWSUIT?

    yes

    X

    no

    VI HAS

    NOTICE

    OF ANY KNOWN RELATED CASES BEEN

    FILED?

    X no

    yes

    If

    "yes," list all related cases by name, case number,

    and court.

    VII.

    IS

    JURY TRIAL DEMANDED IN COMPLAINT?

    yes

    X no

    Signatu

    d

    in

    this cover sheet is accurate to the best of

    my

    knowledge and

    la.

    Bar# 0029364

    Attorney or party

    (Bar

    #

    if

    attorney)

    Danielle N. Parsons

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    23/56

    VIA Email [email protected] Decembe

    Gregory C. Harrell

    General Counsel to David R. EllspermannMarion County Clerk of Court & Comptroller 

    Ocala, Florida 34475

    RE: Clerk’s duty and the civil cover sheet (form 1.997), Rule 1.100(c)(2).

    Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. vs. Neil J. Gillespie, et al., Case No. 13-11

    Dear Mr. Harrell:

    You emailed me December 09, 2014 at 4:59 PM about the civil cover sheet (form 1

    -The case was designated as a commercial foreclosure by plaintiff's counsel

    cover sheet that the plaintiff is responsible for preparing and filing at the out

    case. You will need to take the matter up with the court and/or the plaintiff h

    deem appropriate if you dispute the plaintiff's characterization of the case, as

    has no say in that.

    Mr. Harrell, under Rule 1.100(c)(2) “...all proceedings in the action shall be abated

     properly executed cover sheet is completed and filed...”. This is the Clerk’s duty, se

    Rule 1.100(c)(2) Pleadings and Motions.

     (2) A civil cover sheet (form 1.997) shall be completed and filed with the cl

    time an initial complaint or petition is filed by the party initiating the action.

    sheet is not filed, the clerk shall accept the complaint or petition for filing; b

     proceedings in the action shall be abated until a properly executed cover she

    completed and filed. The clerk shall complete the civil cover sheet for a part

     pro se.

    Currently the civil cover sheet (form 1.997) is not “properly executed” as completed

    The Clerk has a ministerial duty under Rule 1.100(c)(2), “...all proceedings in the ac

    abated until a properly executed cover sheet is completed and filed.”.

    When can I expect the Clerk to fulfill its ministerial duties under Rule 1.100(c)(2)?

    Sincerely,

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    24/56

    RULE 1.100 FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

    such; an answer to a crossclaim if the answer containsa crossclaim; a third-party complaint if a person who

    was not an original party is summoned as a third-party

    defendant; and a third-party answer if a third-party

    complaint is served. If an answer or third-party an-

    swer contains an afrmative defense and the opposing

     party seeks to avoid it, the opposing party shall le

    a reply containing the avoidance. No other pleadings

    shall be allowed.

    (b) Motions. An application to the court for an or-

    der shall be by motion which shall be made in writing

    unless made during a hearing or trial, shall state with

     particularity the grounds therefor, and shall set forth

    the relief or order sought. The requirement of writing

    is fullled if the motion is stated in a written notice of

    the hearing of the motion. All notices of hearing shall

    specify each motion or other matter to be heard.

    (c) Caption.

    (1) Every pleading, motion, order, judgment, or

    other paper shall have a caption containing the name

    of the court, the le number, the name of the rst party

    on each side with an appropriate indication of other

     parties, and a designation identifying the party ling

    it and its nature or the nature of the order, as the case

    may be. All papers led in the action shall be styled insuch a manner as to indicate clearly the subject mat-

    ter of the paper and the party requesting or obtaining

    relief.1

    (2) A civil cover sheet (form 1.997) shall be com-

     pleted and led with the clerk at the time an initial

    complaint or petition is led by the party initiating the

    action. If the cover sheet is not led, the clerk shall

    accept the complaint or petition for ling; but all pro -ceedings in the action shall be abated until a properly

    executed cover sheet is completed and led. The clerk

    shall complete the civil cover sheet for a party appear-

    ing pro se.

    (3) A nal disposition form (form 1 998) shall be

    The clerk shall complete the nal dispoa party appearing pro se, or when the

    missed by court order for lack of prosec

    to rule 1.420(e).

    (d) Motion in Lieu of Scire Facia

    available by scire facias may be grant

    after notice without the issuance of a

    facias.

    1.E.g., “Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for

    ment,” “Defendant’s Motion to Compel,” “Orde

    dant’s Motion to Dismiss,” “Final Judgment for P

    Committee Notes

    1971 Amendment. The change requires a mor

    nation of the document that is led so that it may

    identied. It also species the applicability of the

    of the various documents that can be led. For exa

    dismiss should now be entitled “defendant’s mot

    complaint” rather than merely “motion” or “moti

    1972 Amendment. Subdivision (a) is amende

    mandatory when a party seeks to avoid an afrm

    an answer or third-party answer. It is intended to

    the problems exemplied by Tuggle v. Maddox, 6

    1952), and Dickerson v. Orange State Oil Co., 12

    2d DCA 1960).

    1992 Amendment. Subdivision (b) is amendnotices of hearing to specify the motions or ot

    heard.

    RULE 1.110. GENERAL RULES O

    PLEADING

    (a) Forms of Pleadings. Forms of ac

    nical forms for seeking relief and of ple

    or motions are abolished.

    (b) Claims for Relief. A pleading w

    a claim for relief, whether an original c

    claim, crossclaim, or third-party claim

    cause of action and shall contain (1) a s

    Filing # 23275828 E-Filed 02/03/2015 01:25:45 AM

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    25/56

    THIS IS NOT A COMMERCIAL FORCLOSURE IN THE CIRCUIT COU

    FIFTH JUDICIAL CIR

    IN AND FOR MARIONREVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.,

    CASE NO.: 2013-CA-0

     Plaintiff, 42-2013-CA-000115-A

    vs. Residential Home For

    Florida Homestead of N

     NEIL J. GILLESPIE AND MARK GILLESPIE

    AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE GILLESPIEFAMILY LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT

    DATED FEBRUARY 10, 1997, ET AL.

    Defendants.

     ________________________________________/

    DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO VERIFIED COMPLAINT TO FORECLO

    HOME EQUITY CONVERSION MORTGAGE (HECM); DEFENSES AND CRECOUPMENT; OTHER DEFENSES; COUNTER-CLAIMS; AND CROSS-

    Defendants Neil J. Gillespie, individually, and as former Trustee (F.S. Ch. 7

    of the terminated Gillespie Family Living Trust Agreement Dated February 10, 199

    (“Terminated Trust”), a person with disabilities, indigent, denied counsel appointme

    reluctantly appearing pro se, answers the Plaintiff’s Verified Complaint To Foreclos

    Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) (“Verified Complaint”, “HECM”, and/or “re

    mortgage”), demand trial by jury, and allege:

    1. As to paragraph 1 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegationreverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further means to colle

    2. As to paragraph 2 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegatio

    reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further means to colle

    There nothing is attached to the Verified Complaint as Exhibits "A" and "B " respec

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    26/56

    DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO VERIFIED COMPLAINT TO FORECLOSE

    HOME EQUITY CONVERSION MORTGAGE (HECM); DEFENSES AND CLAIMS IN RECOU

    OTHER DEFENSES; COUNTER-CLAIMS; AND CROSS-CLAIMS

    3. As to paragraph 3 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegatio

    is attached to the Verified Complaint as Composite Exhibit "C." A HECM reverse m

    non-recourse loan and the lender has no further means to collect the debt.

    4. As to paragraph 4 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegation

    reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further means to colle

    5. As to paragraph 5 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants admit the allegatio

    month the Plaintiff sends a monthly statement to Penelope Gillespie, see attached. T

    sued the wrong party. A HECM foreclosure must commence within 6 months. 24 C206.125(d)(1). Bank of America gave notice October 5, 2009 the mortgage was due

    The Plaintiff did not foreclose until January 9, 2013. The time has expired, even und

    A HECM reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further mea

    the debt.

    6. As to paragraph 6 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegation

    reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further means to colle

    The property is the principal residence of me, Neil J. Gillespie, my homestead propeexempt from levy and execution under Section 4, Article X of the Florida State Con

    7. As to paragraph 7 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegation

    reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further means to colle

    The Plaintiff filed notice of lis pendens on or about January 9, 2013. Validity of a n

     pendens is one year from filing. § 48.23(2), Fla. Stat. (2013). The Plaintiff failed to

     pendens and it is not valid. Pursuant to my authority as Trustee of the Trust, and act

    capacity, I transferred the property to the beneficiary, myself, on January 14, 2015.

    my authority as Trustee of the Trust, and acting in that capacity, I terminated the Tr

     provided by Fla. Stat. § 736.0414, and Article V, the Trust.

    8. As to paragraph 8 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegation

    9. As to paragraph 9 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegation

    reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further means to colle

    10. As to paragraph 10 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegatio

    reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further means to colle

    11 As to paragraph 11 of the Verified Complaint Defendants are without know

    A S’ A S O CO A O O C OS

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    27/56

    DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO VERIFIED COMPLAINT TO FORECLOSE

    HOME EQUITY CONVERSION MORTGAGE (HECM); DEFENSES AND CLAIMS IN RECOU

    OTHER DEFENSES; COUNTER-CLAIMS; AND CROSS-CLAIMS

    13. As to paragraph 13 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants are without know

    therefore deny the allegations. A HECM reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan an

    has no further means to collect the debt.

    14. As to paragraph 14 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegatio

    record shows the Plaintiff failed to effectuate service of process on Defendant, NEIL

    GILLESPIE AND MARK GILLESPIE AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE GILLESPIE

    LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 10,1997, which is not a pro

    Pursuant to my authority as Trustee of the Trust, and acting in that capacity, I termin

    Trust as provided by Fla. Stat. § 736.0414, and Article V, the Trust. A HECM reveris a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further means to collect the debt.

    15. As to paragraph 15 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegatio

    16. As to paragraph 16 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegatio

    information and belief, the Plaintiff failed to follow the procedure for constructive s

     process, and appointment of guardian ad litem for UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF ELIZA

    BAUERLE. A HECM reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has nomeans to collect the debt.

    17. As to paragraph 17 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants are without know

    therefore deny the allegations. A HECM reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan an

    has no further means to collect the debt.

    18. As to paragraph 18 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegatio

    record shows the Plaintiff failed to effectuate service of process on UNKNOWN TE

    POSSESSION 1 and UNKNOWN TENANT IN POSSESSION 2. A HECM reverse

    a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further means to collect the debt.

    19. As to paragraph 19 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegatio

    an improper party. A HECM reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender

    further means to collect the debt.

    20. As to paragraph 20 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegatio

    reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further means to colle

    21. As to paragraph 21 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegatio

    reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further means to colle

    DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO VERIFIED COMPLAINT TO FORECLOSE

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    28/56

    DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO VERIFIED COMPLAINT TO FORECLOSE

    HOME EQUITY CONVERSION MORTGAGE (HECM); DEFENSES AND CLAIMS IN RECOU

    OTHER DEFENSES; COUNTER-CLAIMS; AND CROSS-CLAIMS

    UNKNOWN TRUSTEES, SETTLERS AND BENEFICIARIES OF UNKNOWN

    SETTLERS/BENEFICIARIES OF THE GILLESPIE FAMILY LIVING TRUST A

    DATED FEBRUARY 10, 1997.” Pursuant to my authority as Trustee of the Trust, a

    that capacity, I terminated the Trust as provided by Fla. Stat. § 736.0414, and Articl

    Trust. A HECM reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has no furth

    collect the debt.

    23. As to paragraph 23 of the Verified Complaint, Defendants deny the allegatio

    reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further means to colle

    The Plaintiff filed notice of lis pendens on or about January 9, 2013. Validity of a n pendens is one year from filing. § 48.23(2), Fla. Stat. (2013). The Plaintiff failed to

     pendens and it is not valid. Pursuant to my authority as Trustee of the Trust, and act

    capacity, I transferred the property to the beneficiary, myself, on January 14, 2015.

    my authority as Trustee of the Trust, and acting in that capacity, I terminated the Tr

     provided by Fla. Stat. § 736.0414, and Article V, the Trust.

    DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSES AND CLAIMS IN RECOUPMENT, Sec. 673.305

    See the AFFIDAVIT OF NEIL J. GILLESPIE - DEFENSES AND CLAIMS

    RECOUPMENT, Section 673.4051(1)(a), Fla. Stat. lack of legal capacity of the bor

    Section 673.3051, Florida Statutes, provides for defenses and claims in reco

    Subpart (1)(a)2. provides a defense for "lack of legal capacity, or illegality o

    transaction which, under other law, nullifies the obligation of the obligor;"

    3. Fraud that induced the obligor to sign the instrument with neither knowled

    reasonable opportunity to learn of its character or its essential terms; or 

    Defendants hereby assert under Fla. Stat. § 673.3051 all Defenses and claims in rec

    DEFENDANTS’ OTHER DEFENSES

    A HECM reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further meathe debt. The Plaintiff filed notice of lis pendens on or about January 9, 2013. Valid

    notice of lis pendens is one year from filing. § 48.23(2), Fla. Stat. (2013). The Plain

    renew the lis pendens and it is not valid. Pursuant to my authority as Trustee of the

    acting in that capacity, I transferred the property to the beneficiary, myself, on Janu

    Pursuant to my authority as Trustee of the Trust and acting in that capacity I termin

    DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO VERIFIED COMPLAINT TO FORECLOSE

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    29/56

    DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO VERIFIED COMPLAINT TO FORECLOSE

    HOME EQUITY CONVERSION MORTGAGE (HECM); DEFENSES AND CLAIMS IN RECOU

    OTHER DEFENSES; COUNTER-CLAIMS; AND CROSS-CLAIMS

    commence within 6 months. 24 C.F.R. § 206.125(d)(1). Bank of America gave noti

    2009 the mortgage was due and payable. The Plaintiff did not foreclose until Januar

    The time has expired, even under Fla. law. A HECM reverse mortgage is a non-reco

    and the lender has no further means to collect the debt.

    Statute of Limitations. A HECM foreclosure must commence within 6 months. 24 C

    206.125(d)(1). Bank of America gave notice October 5, 2009 the mortgage was due

    The Plaintiff did not foreclose until January 9, 2013. The time has expired, even und

    A HECM reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan and the lender has no further mea

    the debt.

    DEFENDANTS’ COUNTER-CLAIMS

    The Plaintiff failed to effectuate service on the Defendants, therefore this Court doe

    lawful jurisdiction over the Defendants, thus the Defendants’ counter-claims agains

    will be brought by a separate action.

    DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-CLAIMS

    The Plaintiff failed to effectuate service on the Defendants, therefore this Court doe

    lawful jurisdiction over the Defendants, thus the Defendants’ cross-claims will be b

    against Counter Parties by a separate action.

    RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED February 2, 2015. CORRECTED Feb-03-2015

     Neil J. Gillespie, individually, and former Trustee, F.S. Ch. 736 Part III, of the Term

    8092 SW 115th Loop

    Ocala, Florida 34481

    Phone: 352-854-7807

    Email: [email protected]

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    30/56

    Amended Certificate of Service

    CORRECTED Feb-03-2015

    I Hereby Certify that I provided February 2, 2015 CORRECTED Feb-03-20

    DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO VERIFIED COMPLAINT TO FORECLOSE HOM

    CONVERSION MORTGAGE (HECM); DEFENSES AND CLAIMS IN RECOUP

    OTHER DEFENSES; COUNTER-CLAIMS; AND CROSS-CLAIMS through the F

    Filing Portal to names on the service list.

    Mr. Curtis Wilson, Esq. Ms. Colleen Murphy Davis, AU

    McCalla Raymer, LLC 400 N. Tampa Street, Suite 320225 E. Robinson Street, Ste. 660 Tampa, FL 33602

    Orlando, FL 32801 Email: USAFLM.State.Foreclo

    Email: [email protected] [email protected]

    USAFLM.HUD.Disclaimers@

    Oak Run Homeowners Association, Inc. Development & Construction Corporat

    Registered Agent Paul Pike c/o Carol Olson, Vice President of Adm

    11665 SW 72ND CIRCLE and Secretary-Treasurer, for RA PriyaOCALA, FL 34476 10983 SW 89 Avenue

    c/o ORHA President Ocala, FL 34481

    Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]

     Neil J. Gillespie and Mark Gillespie as Co-Trustees of the Gillespie Family Living

    Agreement dated February 10, 1997

    8092 SW 115th Loop

    Ocala, FL 34481

    Email: [email protected]

    Email: [email protected]

     Neil J. Gillespie Mark Gillespie

    8092 SW 115th Loop 7504 Summer Meadows Drive

    Ocala, FL 34481 Ft. Worth, TX 76123

    Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]

    Unknown spouse of Mark Gillespie n/k/a Joetta Gillespie

    7504 Summer Meadows Drive

    Ft. Worth, TX 76123

    Email: mark gillespie@att net

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    31/56

    Elizabeth Bauerle n/k/a Elizabeth Bidwood Unknown spouse of Elizabeth B

    7504 Summer Meadow Drive 6356 SW 106th Place

    Ft. Worth, TX 76123 Ocala, FL 34476

    Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]

     NOTE: Plaintiff’s Counsel,

    Danielle Nicole Parsons (FL Bar ID 29364),

    Curtis Allen Wislon (FL Bar ID 77669), and,McCalla Raymer, LLC, a Foreign Limited Liability Company (Geor

    (collectively “McCalla Raymer”)

    failed to follow the procedure for constructive service of process for Unknown Settl

    /Beneficiaries of The Gillespie Family Living Trust Agreement dated February 10,

    other unknown parties, and failed to move the Court for appointment of a representa

    unknown parties. Judge Stancil stated in open court December 18, 2014 that only a

    represent a trust, but no lawyer was appointed to represent the unknown parties, or o

    RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED February 2, 2015. CORRECTED Feb-03-

     NEIL J. GILLESPIE, individually, and as former trustee, F.S. Ch. 736 Part I

    8092 SW 115th LoopOcala, Florida 34481

    Phone: 352-854-7807

    Email: [email protected]

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    32/56

    RMS'"

    Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc

    Statement Date: J

    5010 Unbar Drive, Suite 100

    Nashville,

    TN

    37211

    Year

    Ending: Dec

    Monthly

    Statement

    5618

    PENELOPE M GILLESPIE

    8092 SW 115TH LOOP

    OCALA, FL 34481

    ***

    THIS IS NOT A

    BILL

    ***

    Account Information

    Pay Plan Type:

    Funded Date:

    Loan

    :

    Borrower:

    Property:

    Line of Credit

    06/16/2008

    68011002615899

    PENELOPE M GILLESPIE

    8092 SW 115TH LOOP

    OCALA, FL 34481

    Interest Rates

    Interest Rate Type: Monthly (1-Yr CMT)

    Month Index Margin Int. Rate

    (Index+Margin)

    December: 0.110°A> 1.500°A> 1.610°A>

    January: 0.140°A> 1.500°A> 1.640°A>

    February (**) 0.270°A> 1.500%

    1.770°A>

    Your Reverse Mortgage loan has a variable-rate feature; the monthly and

    daily periodic rates may vary

    as a

    result. Please refer to important

    informatIon found on the back of this monthly statement and on the

    additional page.

    . Credit Line Set Aside Informat

    Original Credit Line:

    Current Gross Credit Line:

    Unsch. Credit Line Disb. Bal. (-):

    Net Credit Line Set Aside (=):

    * Modified Term

    or

    Modified

    Principal Limit Information

    Original Principal Limit

    Current Principal Limit:

    Loan Balance (-):

    Servicing Fee Set Aside (-):

    Repair Set Aside (-):

    First Year Set Aside (-):

    Credit Line Set Aside (-):

    Net Principal Limit (=):

    Interest Rate Information:

    ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE (APR): 2.424°'c»

    Loan Periodic Rates: Mortgage Insurance Premium (MIP) Periodic Rates:

    Interest (F

    IMonthly Periodic Rate on

    IAPPlicable Principal Balance:

    MIP Monthly Periodic Rate on Applicable

    0.1340A> Principal Balance:

    Periodic

    Finance C

    Daily Periodic Rate on

    MIP Daily Periodic Rate on Applicable

    Applicable Advances or

    0.004

    0

    A

    Advances or Payments:

    ~ ~ y m n t s

    Corresponding APR:

    1.610°A>

    Corresponding APR:

    Notice

    of

    Changes in

    your

    Interest Rate on

    your

    Adjust able Rate Reverse Mortgage

    On February 01, 2015, the interest rate on your adjustable-rate Reverse Mor tgage will increase from 1.640°A> to 1.

    interest rate was based on an index value of 0.140°A>. To determine your new interest rate, we added the current in

    .:fI .

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    33/56

    RMS'" Reverse

    Mortgage

    Solutions Inc

    Statement

    Date:

    5010 Unbar Drive, Suite 100

    Nashville,

    TN 37211

    Year

    Ending: De

    Loan Balance

    ctivity

    Current Month

    114,592.56

    revious Loan Balance

    0.00

    oan

    Advance

    I

    Scheduled Payment (if applicable):

    0.00

    oan Advance / Unscheduled Disbursements (if applicable):

    0.00

    epair Set Aside Disbursements:

    0.00

    axes Paid:

    Insurance Paid:

    0.00

    0.00

    ther Property Charges:

    153.75

    nterest (Finance Charge):

    MIP (Finance Charge): paid to HUD:

    47.75

    Monthly Servicing Fee (Finance Charge): 30.00

    0.00

    hange of Plan Fee/Misc. (Finance Charge):

    0.00

      '

    :

    Transaction Intll'c>rmatic>n):

    otal Balance ity:

    Closing Loan Balance as of December

    31,2014 114,824.06

    * Corporate Advance (not part of Loan Balance):

    197.50

    Transaction Information

    Transaction Effective Transaction Description

    Date Date

    12/31/2014 12/31/2014

    Monthly Interest, MIP Accrual

    &

    SF

    12/29/2014 12/29/2014 Corp Adv - S306 - Other

    12/19/2014 12/19/2014 Corp Adv - Prop Preserve - Prop

    Inspect

    12/05/2014 12/05/2014 Corp Adv - Prop Preserve - Prop

    Inspect

    Grand Total:

    Principa.1 Interest

    MIP Servicing

    Advances Fee

    Ad

    0.00 153.75 47.75

    30.00

    0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

    0.00

    0.00 0.00 0.00

    0.00

    0.00 0.00 0.00

    0.00

    153.75 47.75 30.00

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    34/56

    R

      t5' Reverse

    Mortgage Solutions

    Inc

    Statement

    Date:

    J

    5010 Linbar Drive, Suite 100

    Nashville, TN

    37211

    Year Ending: Dec

    A.

    ANNUAL

    PERCENTAGE RATE (APR)

    The ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE for the interest portion

    of

    your FINANCE CHARGE may increase or decrease annually ba

    ("Index"). Therefore, the monthly and daily periodic rates relating to the interest portion

    of

    your FINANCE CHARGE may vary. T

    PERCENTAGE RATE that will apply to your Account,

    we

    add a margin to the value

    of

    the Index, subject to certain rate limitatio

    Reverse Mortgage Note.

    The corresponding annual percentage rate for the interest portion

    of

    the FINANCE CHARGE does not include costs other than

    ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE includes interest and all other FINANCE

    CHARGES

    that relate to your loan.

    B. FINANCE CHARGES

    Each advance or payment made to you or on your behalf under your Reverse Mortgage will be subject to a FINANCE CHARG

    each advance

    or

    payment is made. A FINANCE CHARGE will continue to be assessed on your Reverse Mortgage until the en

    all fees due under the Notes, Security Instruments and Loan Agreement are paid.

    C.INTEREST

    The interest portion of the FINANCE CHARGE on your Account is computed by (i) calculating the FINANCE CHARGE on

    beginning

    of

    each month, which includes any payments

    or

    credits applied to your loan during the previous month, (ii) calculatin

    each advance, payment

    or

    credit made to you

    or

    on your behalf during the month, and then (iii) adding all

    of

    these sums togethe

    We start with the outstanding principal balance on your Account at the beginning

    of

    each month, which includes FINANCE

    month (the "Previous Loan Balance"). At the end

    of

    each month, we multiply the Previous Loan Balance by the then-current AN

    divided by 12 (the "Monthly Periodic Rate").

    At the end

    of

    each month

    in

    which any advances (also known as disbursements and labeled as "Disb" on this statement)

    or

    p

    you or on your behalf, we multiply the amount

    of

    the advance or payment by the number

    of

    days remaining in the month after

    made (not including the day the advance was made) and then multiply this amount by the then-current ANNUAL PERCENTAG

    "Daily Periodic Rate"). This calculation is repeated for each advance

    or

    payment made to you

    or

    on your behalf during the mont

    The sum

    of

    the final result

    of

    these calculations equals the interest portion of your FINANCE CHARGE for the month.

    D. MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS (MIP)

    In

    addition, mortgage insurance premiums ("MIP"), which are a FINANCE CHARGE, are computed by as follows:

    At the end

    of

    each month, we multiply the lesser

    of

    the Previous Loan Balance

    or

    the maximum balance on which HUD require

    MIP rate divided by 12 (the "MIP Monthly Period Rate"). At the end

    of

    each month

    in

    which any advances (also known as d

    "Disb" on this statement) or payments have been made to you or on your behalf, we multiply the amount of the advance

    or

    pay

    or payment that exceeds the maximum advances

    or

    payments on which HUD requires MIP to be paid) by the number

    of

    days

    that advance or payment was made (not including the

    day

    the advance was made),and then multiply this amount by your MIP

    Daily Periodic Rate"). This calculation is repeated for each advance or payment made to you or on your behalf during the month

    The sum of the final result of these calculations equals the mortgage insurance portion

    of

    your FINANCE CHARGE for the mon

    E. CALCULATION

    OF

    BALANCES

    The "Principal Limit Information" section on the front

    of

    the monthly statement shows your "Original Principal Limit" and you

    includes any "Set Asides". The "Loan Balance" section on page 2

    of

    this monthly statement shows your prior month's Prev

    current month's Closing Loan Balance, which includes the current month's activity. If you would like to determine your payof

    questions on this monthly statement, please call the telephone number listed on the bottom

    of

    this monthly statement.

    F.

    OTHER INFORMATION

    We compute the interest and other fees assessed on your loan monthly. This information is available on page 2

    of

    this monthl

    monthly statement indicates both the current month and year to date interest and other fees.

    If

    you repay all or a portion of you

    interest paid due to a repayment exceeds $600, a separate IRS Form 1098 will be mailed to you by January 31 st. Interest ac

    repayments, will not be reported to the IRS until the loan is paid

    in

    full.

    G. BILLING RIGHTS SUMMARY

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    35/56

     

    At

     

    ' Reverse

    Mortgage Solutions Inc

    Statement Date:

    5010 Unbar Drive, Suite 100

    Year

    EndinQ: De

    Nashville, TN

    37211

    We will acknowledge your letter within 30 days. Within 90 days, we will either correct the er ror or explain why we believe the

    If we determine the monthly statement was not correct, we will credit the disputed amount along with any associated interest

    investigation, you will continue to see the disputed amount on your monthly statement; however, you do not have to pay any

    charges that apply to it

    Even though payments are not required on a reverse mortgage, by law, you are still required to meet

    your Notes, Security Instruments and Loan Agreement. This includes paying your property taxes and insurance premiums.

    H

    CREDIT INFORM TION

    Regular monthly installment payments are not required

    on

    this loan unless you have a repayment plan for a delinquent a

    obligation to pay your property taxes and insurance premiums. The loan must be repaid

    in

    full

    in

    one payment if your

    Payable . Payments may be made by check, money order or wired funds, payable

    in

    U.S. Dollars.

    Do

    not send cash. P

    address listed on the bottom

    of

    this monthly statement. Payments are allocated as described in your Note.

    ~ ; : ~ 1 1   J ~ : ' : ~   IlIi; :,li ~ : . : a ~ : : ~ f I I ~ ; . , : ~ 1 I J ~ : ' : : ~  

    III

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    36/56

    C)

    feel·

    - I .

    Ll

    . .:.

    tTl

    l1l

    .}::l

    ()

    .".:

    .....

     

    7\

    .....

    .t:..

    1 1

    .....

    i@tll@IIIBliimill§m@tll@llfl

    .

    _...

    - ..._..._..- .......

     ....

    ...- ... ,

    : ~ ~ ~ m ~ i ~ ~ I , ~ :  

    ~ ~ W H ~ H   i H ~ ~ I I H ~ H  I  

    n 8 ~ I I E ~ ~  

    i

    . - ..._...

    __

    ... - .....- ...

    - ...

    _...

    imi \miHiliiiHTI lllliiiiml \mtIH

    = ; ~ = = = = = ~ ; ~

    i § t i i @ i i i B i i i § i i i ~ i l l l i i § t i i @ i i t j  

    = = = ~ = = ~ ~ = =

    i B H i i @ i i i ® i i i m i i i § H j B ~ i i i @ i i i j  

    Illi!IIIIII!lilillllllll!III!1

    ~ ~ H i i m i H @ i j j m i i i @ i i i ~ H i i m i i H  

    ::::.::::::::: = = = = = ~   : : : ~  

    m t i i m i H B i i i § i i i ~ i l l l i i § t i i @ i i t

    -

    ...

    - ...

    __ ... _- .. ..-..

    ...

    -

    ...

    _- ....

    · m t l § l i f ~ H i ~ i l f ] i l i m t i j § l i l ~  

    mf[l@llimlltmIIIEfIII@lilmllij

    = = = = = = = = = ~

    @ i i i @ i i i B i B m i i i B ~ i i i @ i i i @ i i i j  

    =: : := : : : := : : := : : : : .= : : := : : := : : : :

    ~ ~ i i i § i H @ i j H B i i i @ i i i ~ H i i § i i H  

    ~ ; = = = = = = ~ ; =

    · § t i i § i i i B i i i § i i i ~ ~ i i i § t i i @ i i i i  

    = = ; ; = ~ ~ = = = ;

    B ~ i B @ i i j ® i i i m i i i § i i i B ~ t i j @ i i j j  

    m f j l m l l ~ m l l f m l l m { : { i @ : { l m l : l ~ i  

    = = ~ = = = = = =

    m i i i R i i i m i i i f f i i i j i ? : ~ i i i m i i i R i i i ;  

    ~ = : : : = : : : = : : : = ; ; : = : : : = : : : = : : : :  

    i ~ H i i B i H m i i i m i i i @ i i i ~ ~ i i i B H H  

    § ~ § q § § ~ ~

    · · : t 1 k . : : ~   i l h : : : ~ l ~ : : : d l ~ : : : ~ l l l ~ : : : d l l ~ : . : : ~

    ._ .....

    .....  .._... ..

    ~  

    IJ

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    37/56

    Termination of the Gillespie Family Living Trust Agreement Dated February 10

    STATE OF FLORIDA )

    ) SS.:

    COUNTY OF MARION )

    AFFIDAVIT

    BEFORE ME this day personally appeared NEIL

    J.

    GILLESPIE, who upon b

    sworn deposed upon oath as follows:

    1.

    My name is Neil J. Gillespie. I am over eighteen years

    of

    age. This affidavit is

    personal knowledge unless otherwise expressly stated.

    2.

    I am sole Trustee of the Gillespie Family Living Trust Agreement Dated Febru

    1997 (hereinafter Trust ).

    3. My Florida residential homestead property is the sole asset

    of

    the Trust, proper

    8092 SW 115th Loop, Ocala, Florida 34481, Marion County, Florida, (the property )

    have lived in the property continuously and uninterruptedly since February 9, 2005, T

    7013-007-001, legal description:

    Lot(s)

    1

    Block G, OAK RUN WOODSIDE TRACT, according to the Plat the

    recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page(s) 106 through 112, inclusive of the Public Re

    Marion County, Florida.

    4. Pursuant to my authority as Trustee of the Trust, and acting in that capacity, I t

    the remaining trust property to the beneficiary, myself, on January 14,2015.

    5. Pursuant to my authority as Trustee of the Trust, and acting in that capacity, I h

    terminate the Trust as provided by Fla. Stat. § 736.0414, and Article V, the Trust. The

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    38/56

    having a total value less than 50,000 may terminate the trust

    if

    the trustee concludes

    value

    of

    the trust property is insufficient to justify the cost

    of

    administration.

    FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT,

    The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, this 2nd day

    of

    Febru

    FL-bL

     

     Sl

    by Neil J. Gillespie, who is personally known to me, or who has produced .

    identification and states that he is the person who made this affidavit and that its conte

    truthful to the best

    of

    his knowledge, information and belief.

    of

    Notary Public

    (SEAL)

    Notary Public

    State

    of Florida

    Angelica Cruz

    y

    Commission EE067986

    Expires

    02127 2015

    My Commission Expires: - - - - . 2 J _ 2 , _ : . r ~ , _ S   _

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    39/56

     

    THIS

    IS

    NOT

    A COMMERCIAL

    FORCLOSURE

    IN THE CIRCUIT COUR

    FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRC

    IN AND FOR MARION

    REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.,

    CASE NO.: 2013-CA-00

    Plaintiff,

    42-2013-CA-000115-AX

    vs.

    Residential Home Forec

    Florida Homestead

    of

    Ne

    NEIL J. GILLESPIE AND MARK GILLESPIE

    AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE GILLESPIE

    FAMILY LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT

    DATED FEBRUARY 10,1997, ET AL.

    Defendants.

    AFFIDAVIT OF NEIL J. GILLESPIE - DEFENSES AND CLAIMS IN RECOU

    Section 673.4051(1)(a), Fla. Stat. lack

    of

    legal capacity

    of

    the borrower

    STATE OF FLORIDA )

    ) SS.:

    COUNTY OF MARION )

    AFFIDAVIT

    BEFORE ME, this day personally appeared NEIL J. GILLESPIE, who upon

    sworn deposed upon oath as follows:

    1.

    My name is Neil J. Gillespie. I am over eighteen years of age. This affidavit is

    personal knowledge unless otherwise expressly stated.

    2. I have resided at 8092 SW 115th Loop, Ocala, Marion County, Florida ("the p

    continuously and uninterruptedly since February 9, 2005. On November 17, 2009 I ap

    and received the homestead tax exemption as to the property, that 7013-007-001 is th

    AFFIDAVIT OF NEIL J. GILLESPIE - DEFENSES AND CLAIMS IN RECOUPMENT

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    40/56

    Section 673.4051(1)(a), Fla. Stat. lack of legal capacity of the borrower

    3. The Plaintiffs Verified Complaint To Foreclose Home Equity Conversion M

    alleges at paragraph

    4:

    Plaintiff is entitled to enforce the Note and Mortgage, pursuant to F.S.

    §

    673.

    owner and holder

    of

    an instrument.

    4.

    Section 673.3051, Florida Statutes, provides for defenses and claims in recou

    Subpart (1)(a)2. provides a defense for "lack

    of

    legal capacity, or illegality

    of

    the tran

    which, under other law, nullifies the obligation of the obligor;"

    Section 673.3051, Florida Statutes, defenses and claims in recoupment.

    (1) Except as stated in subsection (2), the right to enforce the obligation

    of

    a p

    an instrument

    is

    subject to:

    (a) A defense of the obligor based on:

    2. Duress, lack

    of

    legal capacity, or illegality

    of

    the transaction which, under

    nullifies the obligation of the obligor;

    5.

    I am the eldest son ofPenelope Marie Gillespie who died September 16, 2009

    6.

    The death certificate for Ms. G-illespie issued September 23, 2009 for the state

    shows dementia was the immediate cause

    of

    death. No other cause of death is shown

    7. Ms. Gillespie lacked capacity individually on June 5, 2008 to make any finan

    decisions due to Alzheimer's disease and/or dementia.

    8.

    Ms. Gillespie lacked capacity as Grantor Trustee on June 5 2008 to manage o

    contract the Gillespie Family Living Trust Agreement Dated February 10, 1997, due

    Alzheimer's disease and/or dementia.

    9. Guardianship in Florida is governed by Chapter 744 Florida Statutes. o guar

    AFFIDAVIT O NEIL

    J.

    GILLESPIE - DEFENSES AND CLAIMS IN RECOUPMENT

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    41/56

    Section 673.4051 (1)(a), Fla. Stat. lack of legal capacity of the borrower

    11. Ms. Gillespie was a patient ofDr. Gregory J. Howell, M.D., Neurologist, Oca

    Neurodiagnostic Center, Windsor Oaks Medical Park, Bldg 400,

    1901

    S.E. 18th Ave

    Florida 34471, Noverrlber 1,2005 through the close of his practice December 12,200

    12. On May

    8

    2006 Dr. Howell wrote to Dr. Christopher Grainger, Ms. Gillespie

    care doctor, that she was being treated for Alzheimer's dementia, and she was not com

    make any financial decisions:

    "I have been treating the patient for Alzheimer's dementia..." and "It is my im

    that the patient has moderate Alzheimer's and

    is

    not competent to give things

    make any financial decisions..."

    The letter ofDr. Howell dated May

    8

    2006

    is

    attached.

    13.

    On September 4, 2008 Dr. Jay

    J.

    Rubin, M.D wrote to Dr. Granger about Ms.

    participation

    in

    a research study. Dr. Rubin diagnosed Ms. Gillespie with moderate d

    consistent with Alzheimer's disease, currently treated with Aricept and Namenda. Dr.

    his Neurological Examination that "She

    is

    disoriented and certainly confused." The le

    14.

    A

    Home Equity Conversion Mortgage

    or HECM,

    is

    a Federal Housing Admi

    (FHA) "reverse" mortgage program administered by the Secretary, United States Dep

    Housing and Urban Development (Secretary or HUD) to enable home owners over 62

    access the subject home's equity. A HECM reverse mortgage

    is

    governed by federal l

    12

    U.S.C.

    §

    1715z-20 - Insurance

    of

    home equity conversion mortgages for el

    homeowners; and 24 CFR Part 206 - Home Equity Conversion Mortgage Insu

    15.

    A HECM reverse mortgage

    is

    a non-recourse loan, and the lender has no furth

    AFFIDAVIT O NEIL J. GILLESPIE - DEFENSES AND CLAIMS IN RECOUPMENT

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    42/56

    Section 673.4051(1)(a), Fla. Stat. lack of legal capacity of the borrower

    16.

    On April 22, 2008 I attended a telephonic HECM counseling session with Ms

    and Susan Gray, a HUD approved HECM counselor. The counseling session did not

    with HECM rules. Ms. Gillespie was not able to answer questions showing she under

    reverse mortgage. A transcript

    of

    the counseling session shows Ms. Gillespie did not

    participate in the call or the counseling. Ms. Gray did not ask Ms. Gillespie to "succe

    answer five

    of

    the ten review questions" or make other effort to determine

    if

    she unde

    basic information about reverse mortgages, which was impossible due to Alzheimer's

    but required under

    12

    USC

    §

    1715z-20(f) Counseling services and information for m

    Therefore Ms. Gray should not have issued the certificate to Ms. Gillespie, but she di

    17.

    Ms. Gillespie had Alzheimer's disease and dementia and lacked capacity at th

    the HECM counseling session April 22, 2008. Ms. Gillespie lacked capacity at the tim

    HECM loan closing June 5, 2008. Elizabeth "Liz" Baize

    of

    the Ocala office

    of

    The Pa

    Bank was the HECM loan originator. I told Ms. Baize that Penelope Gillespie had Al

    disease early

    in

    the origination process. Ms. Baize's only concern was whether a guar

    was in place for Ms. Gillespie. There was no guardianship.

    18.

    Liz Baize did not require anyone to act as power

    of

    attorney for Ms. Gillespie

    the bank had me and Mark Gillespie added to the quit-claim deed along with Ms. G-ill

    required us all to sign the HECM Notes and HECM Mortgages. When the HECM clo

    2008, Penelope Gillespie age 77 was the only person age 62 or older qualified to be a

    borrower. I was age 52. Mark Gillespie was age 49.

    AFFIDAVIT OF NEIL J. GILLESPIE - DEFENSES AND CLAIMS IN RECOUPMENT

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    43/56

    Section 673.4051(1)(a), Fla. Stat. lack of legal capacity

    of

    the borrower

    20. At all times pertinent to this HECM, the lender and lender parties knew

    or

    sh

    known Ms. Gillespie was not competent and suffered from Alzheimer's disease and d

    21. Charles J. Thomas, a New York Supreme Court Judge, voided a reverse mort

    subsequent refinancing on the grounds that the borrower's mental illness made her un

    understand the reverse mortgage. The Order and a related news story are attached.

    Matter

    of

    Doar (Brunson) 2009 NY Slip Op 29549 [28 Misc 3d 759] Decemb

    Thomas, J. Supreme Court, Queens County Published by New York State La

    Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Thursday, Oct

    Appellate Division continued to require that a mortgagee have knowledge of

    mortgagor's incapacity before the contract which is otherwise voidable could

    In order to void a contract which is voidable because of incapacity, the mortg

    establish that the mortgagee had knowledge of the incapacity and were n

    mortgagees for value. (See Weisberg v DeMeo, 254 AD2d 351, 351 [1998].)

    Under these circumstances, the court finds that Hermina Brunson was incapab

    understanding the agreements that she signed on April 21, 2003 and that Fina

    Freedom is charged with the responsibility to determine, and was in a position

    her incapacity. Therefore, the court finds the mortgages on June 20, 2003 void

    22. Therefore this HECM is void or voidable because the mortgagee had knowled

    incapacity and were not bona fide mortgagees for value.

    FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT,

    The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, this 2nd day

    of

    Febru

    by Neil J. Gillespie, who is personally known to me,

    or

    who has produced

    identification and states that he is the person who made this affidavit and that its cont

    truthful to the best

    of

    his knowledge, information and belief.

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    44/56

    OCALA

    NEURODIAGNOSTIC

    CENT·ER

    Windsor Oaks Medical Park

    1901 S.E. 8th Avenue Bldg 400

    Ocala, Florida 34471

    Tel

    (352) 732-7095

    Fax (352) 732-0477

    Jose Gaudier, M.D.

    Wnliam

    GaY't

    M.D.

    Ken

    NS,

    M.D.

    Gregory

    Howell

    M.D.

    Diplomate•• A

    Psychla

    May

    8

    1

    2006

    h r i ~ t o p h r   Grainger.

    M.D.

    4600

    SW

    46th Court. 8te. 310

    Ocala.

    FL

    34474

    RE: Penelope

    Gillespie

    73008

    Dear

    Dr.

    Grainger:

    I last saw Ms. Gillespie in

    February. I

    have since received notffication from her

    son

    who

    takes

    lives with her

    that

    she had

    contributed 40,000 towards

    a

    mortgage to purchase a share in

    a

    res

    money was gone and the

    restaurant

    closed. This

    involved

    one

    of

    the patient s

    children, a daught

    also apparently

    gave

    several

    paintings

    to the

    daughter

    and

    they

    were not famny portraits

    or

    heir

    were worth around 20.000. The

    patient herself didn t

    know how she

    got

    the

    paintings

    and

    was

    whether

    the

    paintings

    were on loan to

    the

    daughter or whether she is going to return them. The p

    riding in

    a

    car with

    a friend

    who

    would drink

    and

    drjve.

    At

    this point

    the son

    now

    lives

    with her

    and has Power

    of

    Attorney..

    I

    have been treating the

    patient

    for

    Alzheimer s

    dementia, which Is

    moderate. She

    is on both Aric

    and Namenda 10mg b.i.d.

    along with

    her

    other medications, which include Dlovan for

    hYPertens

    her heart. Nitroglycerine, Nu-iron for anemia,

    va,rjous

    vitamins,

    and

    Aspirin.

    It is my Impression that the patient has moderate AlzheJmer·s

    nd

    Is

    not competent

    to give things

    any financial decisions and needs Power of Attorney or

    legaJ

    guardian to look after

    her

    bills

    and-

    t

    and make sure

    that

    she doesn t give away items or her money to inappropriate people.

    The

    patient s

    other medications right

    now

    include Metoprolol, Oynacirc, Coumadin, Lasix. Spiro

    iron,

    centrum SHver.

    812. and some

    prn Nitroglycerine.

    The patient s blood pressure today was 110 64 in the right arm and 82 50

    in

    the

    left

    arm.

    'Sh

    deficits.

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    45/56

    NEUROLOGICAL ASSOCIATES

    Jay J RUbin, M,D   , P.A  • Anette V. Nieves, M.D. • Anna Y. Khan

    Specializing in Neurological, Neuromuscular, Movement, Sleep,

    nd

    Cerebrova

    Florida

    Professional

    Park (352)

    732-9643

    Del Webb

    2685 SW   Place

    (352) 732-2243

    fax 14031 D

    Ocala,

    Fl34474 NeuroHealthinc.com

    Summerf

    September 4, 2008

    Christopher

    Grainger, M.D.

    4600 SW 46

    th

    Court, #310

    Ocala. Florida 34474

    NEUROLOGICAL CONSULTATION

    Re: Penelope M. Gillespie

    Dear

    Christopher:

    Thank you for

    requesting a

    neurological

    consu1tation

    regarding this 77-year-old

    female

    with A

    Mrs.

    Gillespie

    is accompanied by

    her

    son who is a

    very

    good

    historian.

    He

    also

    provided

    regarding her

    current

    medications.

    History

    of Present Illness:

    Mrs. Gillespie has a history

    of

    progressive short-term memory

    imp

    with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease made by Dr. A. Singh in 2004. She was placed on

    evaluated

    neurologically

    by Dr.

    Howell

    and

    treated

    with Aricepl In

    2007, Aricept

    was stoppe

    whereupon

    her memory worsened.

    Mrs. GiJJespie

    stopped

    driving in

    2004. Her son

    cooks

    medications.

    She generally

    eats

    and sleeps well, sleeping

    about

    eight to ten hours a

    day on th

    infrequently awakens

    during

    the night. She wears Depends for incontinence and

    for

    occasiona

    some episodes of increased confusion but

    no

    hallucinations.

    Generally,

    her disposition is

    ve

    quite cooperative.

    More recently. she has been under the care

    of

    Dr.

    Gaya,

    but

    her

    son

    expressed

    an

    interes

    Investigational Study. Her son indicates that Mrs. Gillespie

    has

    had more confusion this

    year

    often

    does

    not seem

    to

    realize that

    her

    son Jives

    with

    her.

    Your

    evaluation inclUded

    a

    head CT

    scan in

    12/07

    at

    Advanced

    Imaging Center that

    showed

    an

    frontoparietal

    cortical

    stroke

    and

    atrophy.

    She had a

    normal

    TSH and

    8 2

    level

    in

    06/08.

    gradually been elevated and was 1.98

    in

    July

    Past Medical/Surgical

    History:

    Is

    noteworthy for atrial

    fibrillation1

    mitral valve regurgitation,

    A

    TIA. hypertension

    1

    and irritable bowel syndrome. She is

    sIp

    bilateral total knee arthroplasty (in 1

    Current

    Medications: Namenda 10 mg bid began in 2004 , Aricept 10 mg q a.m. began in

    20 mg qd, Spironolactone 25

    mg qd,

    Coumadin. Ni1roglycerin 0.4

    mg

    pm,

    multivitamins,

    v

    '.

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    46/56

    Penelope

    M.

    Gillespie

    09/04/08 - Neurological Consultation

    (Page 2 of 2)

    Family

    History

    Her mother died at 83 years of age from a stroke. Her father died at 60

    myocardial infarction. Her brother is age 82 and

    her

    sister is age 79, both with heart disea

    grandmother

    also had

    dementia.

    Review

    of

    Systems: Is noteworthy for

    weakness, fatigue.

    hypertension, occasional che

    heartbeat, daytime sleepiness, nocturia, back pain, pain with walking about half a block. con

    anxiety, but there is no history of depression according to Mrs. Gillespie or

    her

    son. Complete

    the

    chart

    and

    I reviewed

    this

    with Mrs.

    Gillespie.

    NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION: Blood pressure is 120/80. Pulse 80 with slight irregularity.

    157 Ibs. She is right-handed. Mrs. Gillespie appears short-stature,

    pleasant,

    cooperative, comf

    somewhat flattened affect

    f

    and with mild bradykinesia. Chest is clear. Heart rate is frequently

    murmur or carotid bruits are present. She is disoriented and certainly confused. She recalled

    minutes with poor visual spatial skills. She scores 17 30 on the Mini-Mental Status Examination.

    FuJI

    visual fields and extraocular

    movements but with

    decreased smooth pursuit.

    Normal

    elevation of palate,

    shrug

    and

    tongue

    movements. There

    is mUd

    atrophy

    present in

    the distal

    lo

    strength

    is

    normal

    throughout. Sensation is only decreased to

    vibration

    in

    the toes.

    Normal co

    Deep tendon reflexes

    are

    diminished

    throughout

    but

    symmetrical.

    Babinski sign is presen

    spasticity

    is present.

    DIAGNOSES:

    1 Moderate dementia consistent with Alzheimer's disease, currently treated with Aricept an

    2.

    History of right frontoparietal

    cortical

    stroke probably

    occurring

    two

    years ago by histo

    scan

    3. Chronic

    renal insufficiency.

    RECOMMENDATIONS/PLAN: I

    revIewed

    the

    findings,

    diagnoses and

    treatment options with

    M

    He is very intelligent. supportive

    and

    provides many documents including a detailed list

    of

    a

    procedures between 10/05 and 07/08. Her son expresses much interest in helping his moth

    research study. Therefore, this is being discussed. If she is a candidate, she will be screened

    her son is interested, then we will pursue appropriate treatment. Otherwise, I am going to reco

    current medications. We will also schedule a return appointment

    for

    Mrs. Gillespie and I look f

    her along

    It was a

    pleasure

    seeing this delightful

    lady

    today and I also appreciate the

    helpful records

    you

    pr

    - Reverse Mortgage Daily - http://reversemortgagedaily.com -

    http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/01/14/judge-voids-reverse-mortgage-says-counseling

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    47/56

    Judge Voids Reverse Mortgage, Says Counseling Fails to ProCompetency

    Posted By Reva On January 14, 2010 @ 9:50 am In Counseling,Legislation,News,Reverse

    Comments

    In a ruling last month, Charles J. Thomas, a New York Supreme Court Judge voided a remortgage and its subsequent refinancing on the grounds that the borrower’s mental il lne

    unable to understand the reverse mortgage.

    In the case, Matter of Doar, 31393/07  [1], the borrower, Ms. Hermina Brunson, took out

    mortgage with Financial Freedom on her home in Queens for $300,000 in December of 2refinancing for $375,000 in June of 2003.

    However, at the time, Ms. Brunson was being treated for chronic paranoid schizophreniaof 2001, her psychiatrist testified that Ms. Brunson was hearing voices, believed her neig

    trying to take her home away from her, and claimed that she no longer had the deed to

    Despite the counseling session lasting 45 minutes over the phone, the judge wrote that i

    meant to be perfunctory or a mere rubber stamp of the banking or mortgage industry. Iintended to secure that the rights of elderly homeowners were protected. The mortgageentrusted with the responsibility of conducting an inquiry of the applicant’s understandinmortgage agreement.” 

    Judge Thomas continued, “There is no evidence that Ms. Brunson understood the terms mortgage or the Counseling Certificate that she signed on June 20, 2003.” He faulted thefor not unearthing the borrower’s mental illness and her delusions regarding her home. significantly for the industry, Judge Thomas ruled:

    While the Certificate of Counseling is an indication that information was given to thomeowners it is not dispositive of the issue of the mortgagor’s knowledge and understanding of the implications of a reverse mortgage or that the National Hous Act has been satisfied. That determination rests ultimately with the court.

    As a result, the responsibility is on the lender to prove that the borrower understood themortgage, regardless of whether or not they received a counseling certificate.

    The judge further faulted the counseling process, noting that there was no evidence as tqualifications of the counselor, whether the counselor spoke to Ms. Brunson or only to heMs. Bunson’s questions were answered, and what information the counselor provided.

    While recent counseling reforms such as the qualification of the counselor addresses som

    issues, this is still a situation that could be repeated today.

    Own Your Home? Over 62? Learn More! Free Reverse Mortgage

    Facebook [6]

    Twitter [7]

    http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/01/14/judge-voids-reverse-mortgage-says-counseling

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    48/56

    Article printed from Reverse Mortgage Daily: http://reversemortgagedaily.com

    URL to article: http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/01/14/judge-voids-revemortgage-says-counseling-fails-to-prove-competency/

    URLs in this post:

    [1] Matter of Doar, 31393/07: http://reversemortgagedaily.com/img-112161623-0

    [2] Reva Minkoff: mailto:[email protected]

    [3] Sign up: http://reversemortgagedaily.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=bccc16f054acb3137aa5fcfe5&id=48b4357284

    [4] RSS feed: http://reversemortgagedaily.com/feed/[5] Google: http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/01/14/judge-voids-reversesays-counseling-fails-to-prove-competency/?share=google-plus-1

    [6] Facebook: http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/01/14/judge-voids-revermortgage-says-counseling-fails-to-prove-competency/?share=facebook

    [7] Twitter: http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/01/14/judge-voids-reversesays-counseling-fails-to-prove-competency/?share=twitter

    Copyright © 2011 Reverse Mortgage Daily. All rights reserved.

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    49/56

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    50/56

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    51/56

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    52/56

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    53/56

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    54/56

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    55/56

  • 8/20/2019 Defendant Gillespie’s Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings-nov-10-2015

    56/56