decision-making and strategic information workshop on m&e of phn programs july 24-august 11,...

36
Decision-Making and Strategic Information Workshop on M&E of PHN Programs July 24-August 11, 2006 Addis Ababa

Post on 19-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Decision-Making and Strategic Information

Workshop on M&E of PHN ProgramsJuly 24-August 11, 2006Addis Ababa

Learning Objectives

By the end of the session, participants will be able to:

• Identify basic purpose of monitoring and evaluation (M&E)

• Understand the components and uses of strategic information

• Identify key elements in decision-making process

• List common barriers to using M&E data for decision-making and ways to overcome them

Monitoring versus Evaluation

MONITORING =

• Tracking changes in program performance over time

EVALUATION =

• Attributing program outcomes to their causes

Illustration of Program Monitoring

Programstart

Programend

TIME->

Programindicator

Illustration of Program Impact

Programstart

Programend

TIME->

Changeinprogramoutcome

With program

Without program

Programimpact

Purpose of Monitoring and Evaluation

The purpose of monitoring and evaluation is to measure program

effectiveness.

What Information Do Decision Makers Need M&E Data to Provide?

• Process:– Was the program carried out as planned?– How well was it carried out?

• Results:– Did the expected change occur?– How much change occurred?

• Impact:– Is the change attributable to the program?– Does the change mean program “success”?

STRATEGIC INFORMATION

Data Versus Information

Can be used interchangeably, but:

• Data often refers to raw data, or unprocessed information

• Information usually refers to processed data, or data presented in some sort of context

Definition of Strategic Information

• Monitoring & Evaluation

• Evidence-based Research

• Surveillance

• Management Information System (MIS)

• Routine Health Information System (RHIS)

Components of Strategic Information

Surveillance Population Surveys

Basic/Academic Research

Programs

Routine HMIS Facility Survey

Monitoring, Analyzing and

Triangulating Core Indicators

Program Evaluation Operations Research Targeted Evaluation (Including, outcome evaluations, rapid ethnographies, economic evaluations, case studies)

National Level Response

Coverage Surveys

National Level Impact/Collective

Effectiveness Modeling

Surveillance/Impact M&E

Uses of Strategic Information

• Strategic Information is the foundation upon which all planning and program design decisions are based.

• Strategic information facilitates program improvement, evaluates progress, and ensures policy compliance.

Strategic Information & Program Life Cycle

ASSESSMENTWhat is the nature of the

(health) problem?

EVALUATIONHow do I know that the strategy is working?

How do I judge if the intervention is making a difference?

STRATEGIC PLANNINGWhat primary objectives should my

program pursue to address this problem?

MONITORINGHow do I know the activities are being implemented as

designed? How much does implementation vary from site to site? How can be program become more efficient or effective?

DESIGNWhat strategy, interventions and approaches should my program use to achieve these priorities?

1

2

34

5

UNDERSTANDING decision-making

What is Decision-Making?

• The process of choosing from among various alternatives using information

What Determines Utilization of SI for Decision-Making?

SYSTEMS APPOACH

TECHNICAL APPOACH

INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIORPOLITICS

CULTURE

SOCIETY

Understanding Decision-Making

Decisionmakers

Decisions

Understanding Decision-Making

DecisionDecisionmakersmakers

SectorSectorHealthHealthEducationEducationCommercialCommercial

FunctionFunctionPolicyPolicyPlanningPlanningBudgetingBudgetingService deliveryService deliveryAdvocacyAdvocacy

EvaluationEvaluation

LevelLevelNationalNationalRegionalRegionalLocalLocal

Types of Decisions

DecisionsDecisions

Policy-makingPolicy-making……

Work plan Work plan developmentdevelopment

……Resource allocationResource allocation

BudgetBudgetHuman Human

resourcesresourcesInfrastructureInfrastructure

Understanding decision-makingUnderstanding decision-making

Why

?

Why

?W

ho else?

Who else?

How?How?

DecisionDecisionmakersmakers DecisionsDecisions

Understanding Decision-Making

DecisionDecisionmakersmakers DecisionsDecisions

Why

?

Why

?W

ho else?

Who else?

How?How?

What What information?information?

Use of data and other information for decision-making occurs within a

given context.

Who is Involved in Decision-Making?

Different types of decision makers• View activities from different perspectives• Have different degrees of understanding of the

program• Need different information• Want different information• Need or want information at different levels of

complexity• Have different intensities of interest

Examples: Decision Makers and Information Needs

Decision maker Information needs

Donor agency Effectiveness Policy implications Sustainability

Implementation Partners

Efficacy Effectiveness Clientele Market share

Policy makers Correct/improved policies Quality Re-appointment

How are Decisions Made?

• Rational/Scientific

• Political

• Routine

When Is Decision-Making Not Political?Submitted Answer to AEA Presidental Address Challenge in 1989 by R. Turpin

• No one cares about the program• No one knows about the program• No money is at stake• No power or authority is at stake• No one in the program • And, no one in the program is making decisions about

the program, or is otherwise involved in, knowledgeable about, or attached to the program

Class Activity: Data Use & Decision-Making

• Why are decisions made in your organization?

• Who makse decisions in your organization?

• How are decisions made in your organization?

• Discuss and present a time when data was used to make decisions...

• … and a time when other factors outweighed data utilization in decision-making

UTILIZATION-FOCUSED EVALUATION

Utilization-Focused Evaluation

Doing evaluations that are useful and actually used• Evaluations are largely unused

• As are research results

• New directions in accountability• Increasing demand for professional evaluations• Need to bring use into practice

Standards for Evaluation

• Utility - serve practical information needs of intended users

• Feasibility - be realistic, prudent, diplomatic and frugal

• Propriety - conducted legally, ethically, and with regard to those involved in and affected by the evaluation

• Accuracy - reveal and convey technically accurate information

Class Discussion

• What are the kinds of situations that pose special challenges to the utilization of M&E data for program decision-making?

• What factors should be considered in order to foster the utilization of M&E findings by intended users?

Increasing Use of M&E Data: Ad-hoc Evaluations

• Develop realistic recommendations for program improvement

• Explore multiple uses of study data

• Continuously remind decision makers of findings & recommendations

• Share findings & recommendations with broad audiences

• Assign evaluation staff to assist in implementing recommendation

Increasing Use of M&E Data: Outcome Monitoring

• Provide timely reports

• Involve program staff in definition of outcome measures and data collection

• Maintain high face validity of outcome data

• Demonstrate use of outcome information

• Repeat outcome measures on regular basis

• Mandate performance monitoring

“Seven Use-Deadly Sins of Evaluators”(per Patton, 1997:54)

• Act as the primary decision-makers• Identify vague, passive audiences as users, instead

of real people• Target organizers as users, instead of individuals• Focus on decisions, instead of decision-makers• Assume the evaluation’s funding agency is

automatically the primary stakeholder• Wait until findings are in to identify intended users

and intended uses• Distance themselves from people and politics

Closing Comments

Information must be based on quality data in order to be useful

Information must be communicatedeffectively in order to be useful

Information must be usedto be good M&E

References

• Patton, Michael Quinn. 1997. Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.