debate technicality of australasian parliamentary system
DESCRIPTION
DEBATE TECHNICALITY OF AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM. debate is all about arguing between affirmative/government team and negative/opposition team upon a motion. Affirmative support the motion Negative deny the motion. MOTION. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
debate is all about arguing between affirmative/government team and negative/opposition team upon a motion.
• Affirmative support the motion
• Negative deny the motion
MOTION
MOTION is the topic to be debated. It should be debatable and impartial.
(THBT=This House Believes That…)
TH would legalize gambling
TH would support euthanasia
THBT we should be free from terrorists
THE ORDER OF SPEAKERS The first affirmative 7 minutes The first negative 7 minutes The second affirmative 7 minutes The second negative 7 minutes The third affirmative 7 minutes The third negative 7 minutes The negative reply 5 minutes The affirmative reply 5 minutes
ROLE OF SPEAKERSROLE OF SPEAKERS
1st speaker of affirmative background, definition, theme line, team split, argument, sum-up.
1st speaker of negative Accept or refuse the affirmative’s definition, background, TL, TS, rebuttal, argument, sum-up.
2nd speaker of affirmative
2nd speaker of negative
3rd speaker of affirmative
3rd speaker of negative
Rebut, rebuild, bulk of case, sum-up
Rebut, rebuild, sum-up
FLOW OF SPEAKERS
AFFIRMATIVE
1st Speaker
2nd Speaker
3rd Speaker
Reply Speaker
NEGATIVE
1st Speaker
2nd Speaker
3rd Speaker
Reply Speaker
FURTHER EXPLANATION
BACKGROUND to establish framework.
DEFINITION
straight motion to be debated literally, current issue. TH Would Enhance GM Crops.
linkable motion not to be debated literally. That militaristic flavor is needed to promote stability.
THEME LINE
Theme line is the underlying reason which answers the big question “WHY” one side of the house supports or opposes a motion. Theme line is what a team needs to prove, or the so-called burden of proof. It is also the main reason why a team attacks the opponent’s case.
TEAM SPLIT
A set of arguments is called a case. It is very impossible to deliver the whole arguments by only a speaker, thus, those arguments should be distributed fairly to the first and second speaker. This is aimed to avoid overlapping job of carrying out particular arguments. It is more preferable to state the team split explicitly.
ARGUMENT / SPLIT Argument is the fragment of thought to support the theme
line. They are usually abbreviated as AREL. ASSERTION Assertion is a statement which shows
one’s stance. REASONING Reasoning is the way of explaining and
elaborating assertion to be comprehensible and logical. EXAMPLES People will not that easily believe in
something unless there is fact or data prove it. Therefore, proof, evidence, example and data are very significance in upholding an argument.
LINK BACK An argument sometimes can go nowhere if it is not known what its relevance with the theme line is. Link back to theme line can bridge the long way from argument and theme line itself.
REBUTTAL To win a debate, debaters not only need to build a
strong case but they also have to attack their opponent’s arguments and provide strong defense from any attacks.
Global Rebuttal: It is an attack against the main core of the opponent’s case, the theme line.
Detailed Rebuttal: It is an attack towards each argument or example. It will not deteriorate the whole case, but at least mess up the opponent’s image.
A case is a forest, it is more effective to focus on the forest as a whole rather than the trees. To be remembered, the trees, however, are the elements of the forest.
Rebuild own’s case Case Enhancement is the part of reply
speech showing how important the proposal is. For negative, it can show how essential the denial is. Enhancing the case means talking about our own case but in a different way. It can be in the form of a story, analogy or joke. The aim is to give a clearer description to the audience.
Comparison In showing how good one’s case is and how bad the opposition may have can be accomplished by comparing both cases.
Definitional Challenge (DC)Definitional Challenge is done unless the
affirmative provides a definition which violates the principle of defining, that is avoiding truism, tautology, squirreling, and time and place setting.
Reject the affirmative’s definition. Provide a new definition and a set of
new case. Rebut with even-if rebuttals. Repetition of definition.
SPEAKER STYLE Language. Fluency and clarity in speaking help debater
transferring what he believes to his audience. It is not as simple as what it looks like because there are many things to consider, such as how to make our speech comprehensible. (spontaneity, loudness, etc)
Eye Contact Gesture / Paralanguage Stance Humor
The nature of debate – changing and dynamic – a debater should up date himself by accessing any kinds of information.
www.debate.uvm.eduwww.debatabase.orghttp://www.geocities.com/nyuparli/novice_edwww.debating.net