data preparedness workshop - napsg foundation · data preparedness workshop ... training, webinars,...

Data Preparedness Workshop2017 National Geospatial Preparedness Summit

August 7th | University of Alabama | Tuscaloosa, AL

2

Michael Donnelly Deputy Director (Acting)

DHS Geospatial Management Office

Welcome & Introductions

David BialekHSIP Program Manager

NGA Source Office of Geography

Goals:

• Review Community Perspectives & Data Driven Lessons Learned from this Past Year

3

• Identify & Prioritize Common Core Geospatial Data Needs of the Public Safety Community

• Discuss National Priority Areas

• Discover Available Data Sets

• Dialogue Around National Data Needs in Public Safety

• Uncover Gaps & Unmet Data Needs

• Network & Build Partnerships to Strengthen Data Preparedness

Objectives:

Deriving ‘Data to Impact’ – Overview of Core Information Requirements

Mission Critical Decision Points

Required by Senior Leaders and Operators

Information required to make best

decisions

Data(EEIs or CODs) required

to fulfill information requirements

Attribute-level data required to fulfill

information needs

Analysis required to fulfill

information needs

4

Start the process by defining critical decision points…

• What decisions need to be made?• By who and when?

• What information is required to fulfill those decision points?

• What data and attributes are needed to fill needs?

• What analysis on the data and attributes is needed to make information actionable?

Applies to all decisions…• Identifying and assessing risk• All types of planning• Developing & conducting exercises• Determining mitigation investments• Managing and allocating resources• Response operations• Recovery operations

Example Core Information Requirements –Situational Awareness

Situational Awareness

Information Point

Description

1. Event scale This point refers to event complexity, extent, and general location. It is an initial

information point needed as soon as available, even if it is a preliminary

determination of event location and extent based on best available data or just-

in-time/predetermined planning assumptions immediately following an incident.

2. Event forecast/prediction For notice events, such as hurricanes and planned events, assumptions and

predictions are commonly used to assess event magnitude and severity. This

includes forecasting consequences to areas directly affected and potential

cascading consequences to/from neighboring communities.

3. Event magnitude For both notice and no-notice events, event magnitude is generally assessed

within 0-12 hours of initial incident. By about 24 hours, the magnitude of the

event has typically been ground-truthed and decision makers are provided with

updated consequence analysis.

4. Demographic trends Key demographic indicators within affected areas are critical information points

for both notice and no-notice events. Demographic information for aiding

decision making is not just basic population and number of households data. This

information must go deeper to include trends and other factors such as primary

languages spoken, socio-economic/income brackets, populations with access or

functional needs, transportation dependencies, and analysis of commodity and

support service requirements based on demographic trends.

5. Critical Infrastructure Impact No later than 24 hours post incident, decision makers need to be provided with

information regarding effects on critical infrastructure. This specifically relates to

impacts on community lifelines such as: transportation infrastructure, electricity,

communications, health systems, potable water, sewer/sanitation, and others.

Updates to this information should be provided on a regular basis but updated

once a day minimally or as additional information becomes available.5

6

Looking Back at 2016

GIS Collaboration

Lessons Learned.

Local Perspective – Lessons Learned

from Recent Events and Exercises

Phil Beilin, GIS Coordinator,

City of Walnut Creek, California

2016 Lessons Learned in GIS Collaboration and Preparedness

from CaliforniaAugust 7, 2017

Phil Beilin

City of Walnut Creek

Data Preparedness Workshop

napsgfoundation.org | @napsgfoundation 7

Synopsis of Your Story

Actionable decision-making

Partnerships


Origins of the Clearinghouse Concept

1st Clearinghouse called for by Gov. Ronald Reagan after 1971 San Fernando Earthquake—2017 is our 46 Year Anniversary!

Managing Organizations

California Seismic Safety Commission

Chair: California Geological Survey (Permanent Lead Agency)

Vice Chair: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute

California Office of Emergency Services

U.S. Geological Survey

Clearinghouse Objectives

● Facilitate field investigations by earth scientists, engineers and social scientists, who converge on the disaster site

● Synthesize information for response agencies

● Clearinghouse does not direct or control activities of participants

Nisqually, WA Clearinghouse, Feb. 2001

2014 S. Napa Earthquake, DR-4193 (photo A.Rosinski)

Federal Agencies:

10+

State and Local:

22+

Academic and Research: 7+

Non-Governmental

Organizations: 12+

Neighboring States and

Jurisdictions: 12+

Private Sector: 16+

Clearinghouse Exercise Successes

9 EXERCISES

Sept. 22, 2015: “…a geospatial method, technique, capability or resource that provides superior support to the mission; and is used by the geospatial community as a benchmark for success”

California Earthquake Clearinghouse

CA CLEARINGHOUSE RECOGNIZED BY

U.S. Department of Homeland Security as

a GeoCONOPS Best Practice!

• Common Operational Data - Multiple data sources and formats orchestrated and made available to other applications

• Make data intelligent so can use for analysis so responders can make informed decisions

• Support sharing on both geospatial and NON-geospatial information

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5GvWUeTFvE&feature=youtu.be

USGS-Open Geospatial Consortium recommendation for technology interoperability with XchangeCore

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5GvWUeTFvE&feature=youtu.be

Vigilant Guard 17 – Combining Data Provided By Multiple Response Organizations, And Shared Through TheCalifornia Earthquake Clearinghouse XchangeCore, For Enhanced Situational Awareness

Each Organization Uses Their Own Application to

Compose Data Into the Right View

DHS Science &

Technology

Directorate

XchangeCore

CA Earthquake

Clearinghouse

Information

Sharing &

Technology

Interoperability

Mandate Means to accomplish mandate

•State of California

•National Earthquake Consortia

•DHS FEMA NEHRP

Information Sharing: Improving Situational

Awareness and Decision Support

Take Away Message

CA Earthquake

CH AAR

SymbologyStandards

Essential Elements

of Informatio

n

Multiple levels of

government

Multiple disciplines

“Data” person -decision maker

relationship

Training, ExercisesWebinars,

lessons learned,

stakeholder engagement


Thank you!

Phil Beilin

City of Walnut Creek GIS Coordinator, CA GIS Council Chair 2017; NAPSG R9 co-Coordinator

http://californiaeqclearinghouse.org or [email protected]


http://californiaeqclearinghouse.org/

19

HIFLD Program Overview

Mike Donnelly

Deputy Director (Acting)


22

GeoPlatform: The Future of HIFLD OPEN

https://hifld-geoplatform.opendata.arcgis.com

23

Current HIFLD Open Statistics Since Inception

# SHP GDB CSV KML

1 Colleges and Universities

Electric Power Transmission Lines Colleges and Universities Electric Substations

2Hospitals Generating Units Hospitals

Electric Power Transmission Lines

3Public Schools

Electric Retail Service Territories

Fortune 500 Corporate Headquarters

National Bridge Inventory (NBI) Bridges

4 Electric Power Transmission Lines Fire Stations Public Schools

Natural Gas Liquid Pipelines

5 Natural Gas Liquid Pipelines Electric Substations Pharmacies Hospitals

Top 5 downloaded layers by file formats:

* Data as of 8/2/2017

24

HIFLD Secure

❖ Location: https://gii.dhs.gov/hifld/data/secure

❖ What’s available:

98 data layers across 21 categories

35 FOUO data layers

63 Licensed data layers

❖ How to request access to licensed data via HIFLD website: https://gii.dhs.gov/HIFLD

❖ Work being done to expand access to Licensed layers

https://gii.dhs.gov/data/secure

https://gii.dhs.gov/HIFLD

The overall classification of this presentation is:

Classified by:

Derived from:

Declassify on:

David Bialek

8/7/2017

Approved for public release, 17-764

HIFLD 2017 Feedback Session

UNCLASSIFIED


26



Recent Acquisitions and Strategy

❖ Transportation Data—• OY 1 purchased 29-June 2017• Data Disclosure Uplift-Local• August 2017 Delivery to NGA

❖ Parcel Data—• Will exercise OY1 28-September-2017• Distinct Feature Class breakout of Residential and Commercial Parcels

• Delivery 05 December 2017

❖ Business Points Data—Request For Proposal and strategy for FY18

27


Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Data Enhancements


Accepted• Hospitals

• Prisons

• Mobile Home Parks

• Nursing Homes/Assisted Care Facilities

• Public Schools

• Colleges and Universities

• Supplemental Colleges

• Major Sport Venues

• Solid Waste

Under Review• LandScanUSA

• Electrical Energy

• Natural Gas POL

• National Shelters

• Day Care Centers

• Public Transit Stations and Public Transit Systems

28

Data Enhancement Lifecycle



29

❖ Since September of 2015

• Contacted 63 HIFLD Data Providers to Discuss Enhancements

• Performed “QA/QC” process on 390+ Data Layers

• Completed Enhancement & Posted 75+ Layers on HIFLD Open

• Ingested 85+ Web Services on HIFLD Open

❖ What’s Next:

• Continue to Partner with Data Providers

• Continue to Enhance Data Layers & Post on HIFLD Open

• Continue to Welcome Input & Feedback


Data Enhancement Strategy


30

❖ Data Enhancements Metrics:

• Average number of edits: 6,624

• Highest number of edits: 60,743

❖ In Fiscal Year 2017:

• Averaging 20+ layer updates per month

• 30 data providers participated in specific communications:

• Confirmed authoritative data source

• Provided data updates

• Participated in quality control process


Data Enhancement Continued


31

Does now represent an opportunity to simplify our brand for the benefit of the user community?


❖Data access to authorized users

• Current-Federal Use Only

• Revised to include State and Local/Tribal exposure• When applicable

• Access and Use Constraint Language• Simplify this information

• Provide easy access to commodity data license agreements

• Provide easy access to constraint information associated with non-commodity datasets

Data Use Agreement (DUA)


Breakout Group Discussions to Prioritize Information and Data

Requirements

33

Report Out From Breakout Groups

34

35

Summer 2017 HIFLD Virtual Feedback Results

Outdated Data

Status of Parcel Data?

I have data to give

36

Summer 2017 HIFLD Virtual Feedback Summary Statistics

Law Enforc., 15%

Fire/EMS, 9%

EM, 51%

Military, 1%

Critical Infra., 16%

State GIS, 3%

Public Health, 2%

Urban Planning , 2% Private Sector, 1% Other, 1% Mission

Affiliation

37

Federal State Local Tribal Other

100+ Respondents

Summer 2017 HIFLD Virtual Feedback Summary Statistics

38

Layers We Can’t Live Without

❖ Location of Federal Buildings

❖ Emergency Services (Fire, EMS, EOCs, etc.)

❖ Law Enforcement

❖ Public Health (Hospitals, Pharmacies, Nursing Homes

❖ Education (Schools, Colleges/Uni., Day Care Facilities)

❖ Pipelines (both Water and Gas)

❖ Electrical Transmission Lines

❖ Electrical Substations

❖ National Bridge Inventory

❖ Communication Towers

❖ Parcels

HIFLD Layers the Community Says It

Cannot Live Without

39


❖ US Cable Undersea Landing Areas

❖ Cell Phone Service Areas

❖ Building Footprints

❖ Internet Exchange Ports

❖ Imagery*

❖ Thermal Imagery*

❖ Elevation Data*

HIFLD Layers the Community is

Desirous for in the Future

40


Select Sample of Mission Use Cases from the Community

On Why They are Leveraging HIFLD Data

“Broadly speaking, our agency works to assess human health effects in communities of potential environmental concern.Layers like these help us identify and characterize populations in the vicinity of environmental sites so that we can createmaps to inform decision making public health officials.”

“We use these layers during Emergency Operations (Disaster Response) for visualization/situational awareness, responseplanning, and decision support. Analysis of dependencies and potential cascading effects (Primarily planning and mitigationresource allocation) Risk assessments for facilities and systems that include business/government continuity analysis.impacts to/from surrounding infrastructure, and response planning activities specific to the site(s)…”

“Planning for future large-scale management and transport of commercial spent nuclear fuel from nuclear power plants toeventual storage and disposal facilities”

“We continuously monitor national and international incidents and events that may impact emergency communications.We prioritize and assess infrastructure for our region, which necessitates understanding vulnerabilities and disruptionconsequences to infrastructure.”

“We (a local county emergency management office) need the ability to display power transmission lines in order todetermine which areas are likely to be impacted by the path of a storm or tornado.”

“BOGS is the coordinator between BIA and 567 Federally recognized tribes with a service population of about 1.9 millionAmerican Indian and Alaska Natives. Managed enterprise-wide, day-to-day operations ($3.2M per year) for the Bureau ofIndian Affairs Branch of Geospatial Support.”

Facilitated Questions & Answers

41

What Else….? Workshop Wrap Up

42

Michael Donnelly Deputy Director (Acting)


Closing Remarks

David BialekHSIP Program Manager

NGA Source Office of Geography

data preparedness workshop - napsg foundation · data preparedness workshop ... training, webinars,...

Documents