data for public health decision...

18
DATA FOR PUBLIC HEALTH DECISION MAKING María Estela Ayala Galdós INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO PESQUERO DEL PERÚ Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Laboratory Capacity Building Workshop Thailand – August 2011

Upload: lekien

Post on 24-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

DATA FOR PUBLIC HEALTH DECISION MAKING

María Estela Ayala GaldósINSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO PESQUERO DEL PERÚ

Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Laboratory Capacity Building Workshop Thailand – August 2011

PERU: FISHERY COUNTRY

Anchoveta

Jack mackerel

Caballa

Pota Coast line; 3.100 km Marine Domain: 900.000Km2

> 700 marine species

RESEARCH

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER

HEALTH AUTHORITY

ACCREDITED LABS - ITP

ISO/IEC 17025/2006 Sensory Microbiology Chemistry Biotoxins

Government Fishery Institution:

INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO PESQUERO DEL PERÚ - ITP

:

Accredited Methodologies at LABS - ITP

FDA, USDA, UE, AOAC, BAM, ISO 3 Sensory 13 Microbiology* 14 Chemistry (5 validated)*

Instrumental Methodologies:

LOD LOQ

* Uncertainty (except for qualitative results)

Accredited Methodologies. Enough?

Clients must be sure thataccredited food tests areconsistently monitoredfor levels of proficiency.

Proficiency at performingtest analysis must bedemonstrated .

PROFICIENCY

Methodology

Equipment

Personnel

Data QualityAssurance

Uncertainty A procedure followed N times (highly unlikely results be always the same) Plotting data: a normal distribution curve.

A TARGET VALUE IS NECESSARY

GOOD REPRODUCIBILITYHIGH PROFICIENCY

SMALL SD

Uncertainty: value of potential errors while performing a particular procedure

Why is a target needed?

Average (mean value) from data obtained from replicates (same procedure).

Proficiency Spread of values Based on N° results closest to the mean value. (Confidence Interval)

x x

x

x

Data: Interpretation and Decisions

Decisions are based on science

Sampling

Type of food

Methodology

Do data detect and quantify food safety risks?

Two scopes:

Quality

Food Safety *

Accept ? Refuse?

* Not negotiable

Legislative Standards & Labs results

If FSO = less than 2.5, but LR= 2,532.5 ± ???????

Decision Criteria: Uncertantyo LQ?o LD?

o Equipmento Methodology

o Personnelo (antagonism/synergism, mattrix effect)

Uncertainty: Total Volatile Bases (N) In Frozen Fish

REF. Official Bull.EU. (CE) N° 1022/2008 Commision October 2008 (L 277/18, L277/19, L277/20).

T- VBN

Balance calibration

Lineality Weight Tare

Lineality

Balance calibration

SAMPLE MASS

DESTILATION

Volumen alicuote

Destilation Time

Recovering

TITRATION

Concentration

Calibration

Temperature

PRECISION

Sample weight

Destilation Process

Titration Final Point

HISTAMINE QUANTIFICATION

STANDARD CALIBRATION CURVE

PRECISIÓN

Sample WeightTotal Volume & Alicuote

Lecturas del área asociada al contenido de histamina.

SAMPLE MASS

Gross Weight

PESOTARA

Balance Calibration

LinealityLineality

Cause-Effect Diagram for HistamineQuantification

Balance Calibration

Acceptance Criteria for UncertaintyEstimation Measures

CONCENTRATIONEXPANDED

UNCERTAINTY

ACCEPTABLE

CONCENTRATION RANGE

100g / 100g 4% 96 a 104 (g / 100g )

10g / 100g 5% 9.5 a 10.5 (g / 100g)

1g / 100g 8% 0.92 a 1.08 (g / 100g)

1g / Kg. 11% 0.89 a 1.11 (g / kg.)

100 mg / kg 16% 84 a 116 (mg / kg)

10 mg / kg 22% 7.8 a 12.2 (mg / kg)

1 mg / kg 32% 0.68 a 1.32 (mg / kg)

< 100 ug / kg 44% 56 a 144 (ug / Kg.)

Lead: SCALLOPS Argopecten purpuratus

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

PIURA ANCASH ICA

Pb mg/kg

2009 2010

Permissible Level = 1,5 mg/kg

LQ = 0,07ppm LD = 0,03ppm

Cadmium: SCALLOPS Argopecten purpuratus

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

PIURA ANCASH ICA

Cd mg/kg

2009 2010

Permissible Level = 1 mg/kg

LQ = 0,01ppm LD = 0,003ppm

NUMBER OF UFC

ENVIRONMENT CONDITION DURING INCUBATION

Temperature

Time

INTRINSIC VARIABILITY

CONFIRMATION

Precision of Count colonies By Analist

SUB SAMPLE AND HOMOGENIZATION

Inoculated plate volumen

C= (CFU/g or mL)

Precision of dispensed volumes

Serial Dilution

VOLUMETRY

Precision of dispensed volumes

QUANTITATIVE MICROBIOLOGY: Cause – effect diagram methods

“ITP - MANUAL : UNCERTAINTY FOR CATEGORY II”

Fishmeal:

Humidity: FAO: Food and Nutrition Paper. Pp: 205 T14/7. NTP : 204.030 / 1986

Fat: LABS-ITP-FQ-003-09 Method. 2009 Ash: Food and Nutrition Paper- pp 228 T14/7. NTP 204.022 (1982) Protein: MÉTODO LABS-ITP-FQ-001-09.2009

Fish Sausage: Sodium Chloride; AOAC: 937.09. 2005 (18th edition) Humidity: FAO. Food and Nutrition Paper. pp. 205 T14/7. 1986

Fat: Método LABS-ITP, FQ-003-09.

Protein: LABS-ITP-FQ-001-09. Method

Ash: FAO, Food and Nutrition paper pp, 228 T 14/7. 2009

Fishoils Free fatty acids: AOAC: 940.28. 2005 (18th edition) Anisidine: NTP: 209.217. 1983 Peroxide Value AOAC: 965.33- 2005 (18th edition)

Fresh or frozen: fish, seafood:

Volatile Basis: Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. REGLAMENTO (CE) N° 1022/2008 de la comisión del 17 de octubre del 2008 (L 277/18, L277/19, L277/20).

Histamine: Método LABS-ITP-FQ-005-2009

“ITP - MANUAL : UNCERTAINTY FOR CATEGORY II”

Km 5,2 Carretera a Ventanilla - Callao

Telephone : 577-0116 577-0118Fax : 577-0019 577-0202Email : [email protected] : http://www.sea-world.com/itp

INSTITUTO TECNOLOGICO PESQUEROLABS - ITP