da responses. then on to the k. then onto the

Upload: db8r0x

Post on 30-May-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 DA Responses. Then on to the K. Then Onto The

    1/10

    DA responses.

    Then on to the K.

    Then onto the counter K.

    Then onto murdering nuking the CPs

  • 8/14/2019 DA Responses. Then on to the K. Then Onto The

    2/10

    The 3 DAs.

    Impact turn: Impact: EXTINCTION. Well, actually were clarifying our plan now. We

    abolish the environment and nuke the world in strategic places. Basically, we Nuke

    Antarctica, the Arctic, North Korea, Iran (durrrrrr), Brazil (except for the rainforests),

    and China.

    Therefore we dont cause extinction because we Nuke all the countries that could case

    nuclear war. So were awesome and all VOTE FOR US CUZ WE KILL ALL THE BAD

    GOVERNMENTS IN THE WORLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    The K We agree with the K everything does come down to LOLWUT. Look.

  • 8/14/2019 DA Responses. Then on to the K. Then Onto The

    3/10

  • 8/14/2019 DA Responses. Then on to the K. Then Onto The

    4/10

  • 8/14/2019 DA Responses. Then on to the K. Then Onto The

    5/10

    LOLWUT?!?!Basically, our case is totally based on LOLWUT?!?!?!

    The counter K They never accknowlege thert more lolcats exist than lolwuts. They also

    commit the fallacy that all kats kant spell as evidenced here.

  • 8/14/2019 DA Responses. Then on to the K. Then Onto The

    6/10

    The alt vote against their LOLWUT is everything K.

    The Advantages

    -- GLOBAL COOLING

  • 8/14/2019 DA Responses. Then on to the K. Then Onto The

    7/10

    WILLIAM MATTHEWS 13 Jun 17:05 EDT (21:05 GMT) http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?

    i=3579019

    Nuclear radiation from the war probably would not affect the U.S., Europe, Russia or

    areas outside of the two warring countries. But smoke would cause colder temperatures

    than the world has experienced in 1,000 years, the pair said in a presentation on CapitolHill on June 13.

    MULTIPLE COMPUTER MODELS SUGGEST GLOBAL COOLING FROM

    NUCLEAR WAR

    WILLIAM MATTHEWS 13 Jun 17:05 EDT (21:05 GMT) http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?

    i=3579019

    Toon of the University of Colorado, and Robock of Rutgers University, used new, more capable

    computer models of the atmosphere to calculate the effects of a regional nuclear war in which

    two countries attacked each other with 50 nuclear weapons.

    Based on their climate modeling, temperatures worldwide would decline by an average of about

    two degrees Fahrenheit in the year after the nuclear war.

    If we nuke the terrorists we get rid of people kats like dis.

    http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3579019http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3579019http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3579019http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3579019http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3579019http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3579019http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3579019http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3579019
  • 8/14/2019 DA Responses. Then on to the K. Then Onto The

    8/10

    If we nuke the terrorists, we get rid of this LOLWUT???

  • 8/14/2019 DA Responses. Then on to the K. Then Onto The

    9/10

  • 8/14/2019 DA Responses. Then on to the K. Then Onto The

    10/10