cvi brookhaven feasibility study

Upload: tucker-initiative

Post on 03-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    1/66

    RevenueandExpenditure

    Estimatesfor aProposedCityofBrookhaven

    November 2011

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    2/66

    TableofContentsIntroduction............................................................................................................................. 1I. Revenues............................................................................................................................ 3II. Expenditures.................................................................................................................... 17AppendixA StudyAreaMap.............................................................................................. 32AppendixB TownBrookhavenDevelopment.................................................................... 33AppendixC MiscellaneousRevenues................................................................................. 37AppendixD UnincorporatedCountyRevenueFiguresandDataSources........................40AppendixE HotelsintheStudyArea................................................................................ 42Appendix

    F

    HOSTCalculations

    and

    County

    Certification

    Letter

    ........................................

    43

    AppendixG CDBGDataTables.......................................................................................... 50AppendixH ParksData...................................................................................................... 55AppendixI CapitalDataTables......................................................................................... 57

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    3/66

    1

    Introduction

    SeeAppendixAforamapofthestudyarea

    See

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    4/66

    2

    3See.

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    5/66

    3

    I. Revenues

    TheFiscalImpactonDeKalbCountywithPossible IncorporationofDunwoody,Georgia Revenue and ExpenditureAnalysis of a Proposed City ofDunwoody

    SeeAppendixBforfurtherexplanationTable1:StudyAreaRevenueEstimates

    RevenueSource DataSource Amount

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    6/66

    4

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    7/66

    5

    SeeAppendixC.

    SeeAppendixDforcountyrevenuedatadetail.

    TotalRevenueEstimate $23,810,619 $28,528,983

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    8/66

    6

    Table2:2010PropertyValuesinStudyAreaandUnincorporatedDeKalb

    StudyArea UnincorporatedDeKalbCounty

    PercentStudyAreato

    Unincorporated

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    9/66

    7

    ThesearelistedinAppendixE

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    10/66

    8

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    11/66

    9

    Table3:2010PopulationFiguresforStudyAreaandUnincorporatedDeKalb

    StudyArea

    Unincorporated

    DeKalbCountyPercent

    Study

    AreatoUnincorporated

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    12/66

    10

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    13/66

    11

    Appendix F contains these two separate calculations using the

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    14/66

    12

    spreadsheetutilizedbytheGeorgiaDepartmentofRevenueaswellasthemostrecentcountycertificationletter.

    ThedatausedforthesecalculationsisshowninAppendixG.4 see

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    15/66

    13

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    16/66

    14

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    17/66

    15

    Table4:

    City

    and

    Fiscal

    Year

    Budget

    Revenue

    Per

    Capita

    StudyAreaRevenueEstimate $149,040

    See

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    18/66

    16

    7See.

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    19/66

    17

    Table5:2010DemographicProfileofStudyAreaandPrimaryComparisonCities

    StudyArea JohnsCreek Dunwoody

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    20/66

    18

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    21/66

    19

    Table6:SummaryofExpenditureEstimates

    TotalOperatingCosts $21,311,237

    TotalAnnualExpenditures $25,083,242

    DeficitBasedonRevenueEstimatesUsing2010PropertyTaxes $1,272,623SurplusBasedonRevenueEstimatesUsing2011PropertyTaxes*** +$3,445,741

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    22/66

    20

    Cityand

    Fiscal

    Year

    Budget

    Dept.

    Budget

    StudyAreaEstimate$215,093

    City

    and

    Fiscal

    Year

    Budget

    Dept.

    Budget Per

    Capita

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $408,260

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    23/66

    21

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Dept.Budget PerCapita

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $2,035,399

    Cityand

    Fiscal

    Year

    Budget

    Dept.

    Budget Per

    Capita

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $280,372

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Dept.Budget PerCapita

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $1,804,216

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    24/66

    22

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Dept.Budget PerCapita

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $151,991

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Dept.Budget PerCapita

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $137,726

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Dept.Budget PerCapita

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $2,701,897

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    25/66

    23

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Dept.Budget PerCapita

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $101,327

    CityandFiscalYearBudget LeasedSpaceSq.Ft. PerCapitaSq.Ft.

    StudyAreaEstimateofSquareFootageNeeded 30,005

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Dept.Budget PerSq.Ft.

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $592,592

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    26/66

    24

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Dept.Budget PerCapita

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $295,620

    SeeAppendixH.

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    27/66

    25

    Table7:StudyAreaParkAmenities

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Dept.Budget Acres CostPerAcre

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $1,376,492

    See

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    28/66

    26

    2010DemographicProfileStudyAreaandSmyrna

    StudyArea Smyrna

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    29/66

    27

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Dept.Budget PerCapita

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $5,568,082

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    30/66

    28

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Dept.Budget LaneMiles CostperLaneMile

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $3,610,978

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Dept.Budget PerCapita

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $1,275,937

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    31/66

    29

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Dept.Budget PerCapita

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $328,576

    SeeAppendixI

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    32/66

    30

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Budget CostPerOfficer

    StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $3,077,847

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    33/66

    31

    CityandFiscalYearBudget Budget PerCapita StudyAreaExpenditureEstimate $827,342

    $3,077,847

    $827,342

    $3,905,189

    Amortizedover5yearsat2.5%interest $831,682

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    34/66

    Appendix

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    35/66

    33

    BackgroundofTaxAbatementTransactions

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    36/66

    34

    TownBrookhavenTaxAbatementStructure

    17 The bond-lease transaction approved for Town Brookhaven consists of five separate series of bonds. The fiveseries were validated in the same validation proceeding in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed$244,000,000. Typically, the aggregate amount of the bonds will reflect the total amount of expected constructionand other development costs for a project.18 For example, initial bonds would be issued to acquire the land, and as improvements are constructed, additionalbonds are issued to acquire those improvements.

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    37/66

    35

    TownBrookhavenPILOTAgreements

    19 Since the bond structure technically consisted of five separate series of bonds, there are five separate, butsubstantially identical, PILOT agreements one for each series of bonds.

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    38/66

    36

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    39/66

    37

    RevenueSource

    Methodology StudyAreaEstimate

    DataSource

    TotalMiscellaneous $13,743

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    40/66

    38

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    41/66

    39

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    42/66

    40

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    43/66

    41

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    44/66

    42

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    45/66

    43

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    46/66

    Example from 48-8-104

    (2) For illustration purposes, a hypothetical example of the (3) In the event the total amount payable in a calendar year to all existing municipalities

    calculation of the equalization amount is provided below. Calculated using DeKalb/Study Area as certified by the county pursuant to subparagraph (d)(2)(B) of this Code section plus

    Example Example data Calculation the total equalization amount payable to all qualified municipalities in the special district

    First, calculate the exceeds the capital outlay proceeds calculated based on a maximum capital factor of 0.200,

    homestead factor in the commissio ner shall pay to the governing authority of each qualified municipali ty a share

    accordance with division of such proceeds calculated as follows:

    (c)(2)(B)(i) of this Code Amount from county certification letter (A) above plus Equalization amount (J) from lef 3,814,328.47$

    section as follows: Does this amount exceed Capital outlay proceeds (A) below? YES

    (A) Capital factor 0.150 0.150 - If yes, continue calculation below. If no, go to (5) belo

    certified by county as

    required by subsection (d) (A) Determine the capital outlay proceeds based on a maximum capital factor of 0.200;

    of this Code section Capital outlay proceeds = Capital factor (A) times Net Sales & Use tax (B) from left 16,600,000.00$(B) Net amount of sales and $50 million 50,000,000.00$ 83,000,000.00$ (B) Subtract the amount certified by the county as payable to existing municipal ities pursuantuse tax collected in the to subparagraph (d)(2)(B) of this Code section;

    special district pursuant Amount from county certification letter: $0.00

    to this article for the (C) The remaining amount equals the portion of the capital outlay proceeds that may be used

    previous calendar year by the commissioner to pay equalization amounts to qualified municipalities.

    (C) Taxes levied for county $1 00 m il li on 10 0, 000 ,0 00 .0 0$ 154,329,606.97$ Total: 16,600,000.00$purposes on only that The commission er shall calculate each qualified municipalit y's share of such remaining amount

    portion of the county tax by dividing the net homestead digest for each qualified municipality by the total homestead

    digest that represents net digest for all municipalities.

    assessments on qualified Net Homestead Digest for municipality: 1,291,864,316$

    homestead property after Total Homestead Digest for all municipalities: 4,198,280,316

    all other homestead Divide Net Homestead Digest by Total Homestead Digest: 31%

    exemptions have been applied

    (D) Calculation of 0.425 0.425 0.538 Total (C) above times calculated percentage above 5,108,031.39$homestead factor using

    figures above =

    [(1-0.150)($50 (4) In the event the incorporated county millage rate for a qualified municipality is greater than

    million/$100 million)] the unincorporated county millage rate, no payment shall be due from the governing authority

    Next, calculate the 15.0 mills of the qualified municipal ity to the governing authority of the county.equalization amount in

    accordance with paragraph (1)

    of this subsection as follows: (5) In the event the amount of capital outlay proceeds exceeds the sum of the equalization

    (E) Unincorporated county 15.0 mills 15.00 19.40 mills amounts due all qualified municipalities plus the total amount certified under subparagraph (d)(2)(B)

    millage rate of this Code section as due all existing municipalities, the commissioner shall distribute to each(F)Minus the incorporated Difference: (10.0 mills) (10.00) (13.91) mills qualified municipality a portion of such excess equal to the net homestead digest for such

    county millage rate for municipality divided by the total homestead digest.

    qualified municipality "Y" Capital outlay proceeds = Capital factor (A) times Net Sales & Use tax (B) from left -$

    Difference: = 5.0 mills 5.00 5.49 mills Amount from county certification letter (A) above plus Equalization amount (J) from lef 10,928,408.00$

    (G) Times homestead factor x .425 0.425 x 0.538 Does amount of Capital outlay proceeds exceed amount from (3) above NO

    (calculated above) If yes, continue calculation below. If no, go back to (3) above

    (H) Equals the equalization = 2.125 2.125 2.953 millsmillage: Amount of excess = Capital outlay proceeds minus amount from (3) above (10,928,408.00)$

    (I) Times net homestead $2 00 m il li on 20 0, 000 ,0 00 .0 0$ 1,291,864,316$

    digest for qualified Net Homestead Digest for municipality from Certification letter: 1,291,864,316.00$

    municipality "Y" Total Homestead Digest for county: 9,051,268,724.00$

    (J) Equals the equalization $425,000 $425,000.00 3,814,328.47$ Divide Net Homestead Digest by Total Homestead Digest: 14%

    amount payable to

    municipality "Y" Total (C) above times calculated percentage above (1,559,783.58)$

    Georgia Department of Revenue

    Local Government Services Division

    Data compiled by: J.Ussery1 of 1

    Scenario 1

    44

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    47/66

    Example from 48-8-104

    (2) For illustration purposes, a hypothetical example of the (3) In the event the total amount payable in a calendar year to all existing municipalities

    calculation of the equalization amount is provided below. Calculated using DeKalb/Study Area as certified by the county pursuant to subparagraph (d)(2)(B) of this Code section plus

    Example Example data Calculation the total equalization amount payable to all qualified municipalities in the special district

    First, calculate the exceeds the capital outlay proceeds calculated based on a maximum capital factor of 0.200,

    homestead factor in the commissio ner shall pay to the governing authority of each qualified municipali ty a share

    accordance with division of such proceeds calculated as follows:

    (c)(2)(B)(i) of this Code Amount from county certification letter (A) above plus Equalization amount (J) from lef 3,902,927.31$

    section as follows: Does this amount exceed Capital outlay proceeds (A) below? NO

    (A) Capital factor 0.150 0.150 0.200 If yes, continue calculation below. If no, go to (5) belo

    certified by county as

    required by subsection (d) (A) Determine the capital outlay proceeds based on a maximum capital factor of 0.200;

    of this Code section Capital outlay proceeds = Capital factor (A) times Net Sales & Use tax (B) from left 18,241,559.40$(B) Net amount of sales and $50 million 50,000,000.00$ 91,207,797.00$ (B) Subtract the amount certified by the county as payable to existing municipal ities pursuantuse tax collected in the to subparagraph (d)(2)(B) of this Code section;

    special district pursuant Amount from county certification letter: $0.00

    to this article for the (C) The remaining amount equals the portion of the capital outlay proceeds that may be used

    previous calendar year by the commissioner to pay equalization amounts to qualified municipalities.

    (C) Taxes levied for county $1 00 m il li on 10 0, 000 ,0 00 .0 0$ 154,329,606.97$ Total: 18,241,559.40$purposes on only that The commission er shall calculate each qualified municipalit y's share of such remaining amount

    portion of the county tax by dividing the net homestead digest for each qualified municipality by the total homestead

    digest that represents net digest for all municipalities.

    assessments on qualified Net Homestead Digest for municipality: 1,291,864,316$

    homestead property after Total Homestead Digest for all municipalities: 4,198,280,316

    all other homestead Divide Net Homestead Digest by Total Homestead Digest: 31%

    exemptions have been applied

    (D) Calculation of 0.425 0.425 0.473 Total (C) above times calculated percentage above 5,613,160.12$homestead factor using

    figures above =

    [(1-0.150)($50 (4) In the event the incorporated county millage rate for a qualified municipality is greater than

    million/$100 million)] the unincorporated county millage rate, no payment shall be due from the governing authority

    Next, calculate the 15.0 mills of the qualified municipal ity to the governing authority of the county.equalization amount in

    accordance with paragraph (1)

    of this subsection as follows: (5) In the event the amount of capital outlay proceeds exceeds the sum of the equalization

    (E) Unincorporated county 15.0 mills 15.00 19.40 mills amounts due all qualified municipalities plus the total amount certified under subparagraph (d)(2)(B)

    millage rate of this Code section as due all existing municipalities, the commissioner shall distribute to each(F)Minus the incorporated Difference: (10.0 mills) (10.00) (13.01) mills qualified municipality a portion of such excess equal to the net homestead digest for such

    county millage rate for municipality divided by the total homestead digest.

    qualified municipality "Y" Capital outlay proceeds = Capital factor (A) times Net Sales & Use tax (B) from left 18,241,559.40$

    Difference: = 5.0 mills 5.00 6.39 mills Amount from county certification letter (A) above plus Equalization amount (J) from lef 11,211,166.00$

    (G) Times homestead factor x .425 0.425 x 0.473 Does amount of Capital outlay proceeds exceed amount from (3) above YES

    (calculated above) If yes, continue calculation below. If no, go back to (3) above

    (H) Equals the equalization = 2.125 2.125 3.021 millsmillage: Amount of excess = Capital outlay proceeds minus amount from (3) above 7,030,393.40$

    (I) Times net homestead $2 00 m il li on 20 0, 000 ,0 00 .0 0$ 1,291,864,316$

    digest for qualified Net Homestead Digest for municipality from Certification letter: 1,291,864,316$

    municipality "Y" Total Homestead Digest for county: 9,051,268,724$

    (J) Equals the equalization $425,000 $425,000.00 3,902,927.31$ Divide Net Homestead Digest by Total Homestead Digest: 14%

    amount payable to

    municipality "Y" Total (C) above times calculated percentage above 1,003,429.98$

    Georgia Department of Revenue

    Local Government Services Division

    Data compiled by: J.Ussery1 of 1

    Scenario 2

    45

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    48/6646

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    49/6647

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    50/6648

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    51/6649

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    52/66

    50

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    53/66

    51

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    54/66

    52

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    55/66

    53

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    56/66

    54

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    57/66

    55

    Department of Recreation, Parks and Cultural Affairs

    Brookhaven Scope Questions

    1. The age and square footage of the recreation centers in Briarwood Park and

    Lynwood Park?

    Briarwood Recreation Center

    History

    The center was built in 1964. It is unknown if the property was either purchased or donated.The origin of its name is unknown.Building Features - less than 10,000 square feet to include:

    x Gymnasium 5205 sq. ft. Multi-purpose room 1200 sq. ft.

    x classroom 525 sq. ft.(estimate) office 90 sq. ft. (est.)

    x mechanical room 60 sq. ft. (est.) hallway 32 sq. ft. (est.)

    x snack area 464 sq. ft (est.) kitchen 70 sq. ft. (est.)

    x x-room 44 sq. ft. (est.) restrooms each @ 296 sq. ft. (est.)

    Lynwood Recreation Center

    History

    x Lynwood Recreation Center originated from the Lynwood Park School.

    x The school was built in the early 40s for the African-American communitystudents in grades 1-12

    x When integration took place in the mid-60s the school closed.

    x The county purchased the land for $1.00 and redeveloped the recreation center inthe early 70s.

    Building Features - 15,000 square ft. The building consist of a game room 38x 28 ,art/weight room 28x 24,

    2. The annual revenue collected from the reservation fees for picnic shelters in Blackwood

    Park and Murphey Candler Park?

    The department only charges a fee to rent a picnic shelter at Blackburn and its estimated annualrevenue is around 1,500 dollars annually.

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    58/66

    56

    3. The total annual revenue generated by the pools in Briarwood, Lynwood, and Murphey

    Candler Parks?

    Briarwood pool = pool closed due environmental issuesLynwood Pool = $800 dollars annually

    Murphey Candler = 31,000 annually

    4. The total annual revenue generated by the tennis courts in Ashford, Blackburn,

    Briarwood, Lynwood, Murphey Candler, and Skyland Parks?

    The Department only charges a fee at Blackburn tennis center and it brings in an estimated$16,600 dollars annually.

    5. The annual costs for operating these parks, pools and recreation centers?

    x It costs the County approximately $113,000 annually to operate the Lynwood and

    Briarwood Recreation Centers.

    x Annual costs to the County to operate Murphey Candler, Lynwood and Briarwood pools:

    Murphy Candler:o $25,000 for personnelo $9,000 chemical costo $3,000 supplies

    Briarwood and Lynwood are the same due to volume of people attending:o 16,000 for personnelo

    5,500 chemical costo 3,000 supplies

    Annual costs for operating Ashford, Blackburn, Briarwood, Lynwood, Murphey Candler, andSkyland Parks:

    o $331,040 per year

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    59/66

    57

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    60/66

    58

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    61/66

    59

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    62/66

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    63/66

    Supplemental ProposedCityofBrookhavenPropertyTaxAnalysis

    January 2012

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    64/66

    SupplementalProposedCityofBrookhavenPropertyTaxAnalysis

    AttherequestofStateRepresentativeMikeJacobs,thissupplementalanalysiswasundertakento determine the potential property tax revenue that would be derived under two hypotheticalmunicipalmillageratescenarios.Utilizingthesamedatausedtopreparetheprimaryreport,RevenueandExpenditureEstimatesforaProposedCityofBrookhaven,theamountofpropertytaxrevenuethatwould be generated by a hypothetical municipal millage rate of 3.35 mills and 3.221 mills with ahomestead exemption of $20,000 was calculated. Because residential homestead property owners inDeKalbCountyenjoythebenefitofapropertytaxrollbackoncountytaxesbyvirtueoftheoperationofthe Homestead Option Sales Tax, identical millage rates imposed by the county and cities within thecounty have a different impact in the dollar amount due the applicable government from residentialhomesteadpropertyowners.

    Theprimarystudyestimatedexpendituresat$25,083,242andrevenuesof$28,528,983basedon the 2011 preliminary tax digest and current county special district millage rate of 6.39 mills. Thisrevenue estimate is based upon an estimation of $9,927,881 in property tax revenue and $43,207 inproperty tax penalties currently being collected in the DeKalb County special district. The estimatedrevenues other than the property tax related revenues are $18,557,895, meaning that for estimatedrevenuestomatchestimatedexpenditures,$6,525,347wouldneedtobegeneratedbypropertytaxes.Asdemonstratedinthetablebelow,themillageratenecessarytogeneratethatamountofpropertytaxrevenue is 3.221. A municipal millage rate of 3.35 mills would generate $6,786,928, which exceedsestimatedexpendituresintheprimarystudyby$261,348.

    Table1:RevenueGeneratedbyHypotheticalCityMillageRates andDeKalbSpecialDistrictMillageRateCityMillageRateof3.221millswith$20,000homesteadexemption

    City Millage Rate of 3.35 mills with$20,000homesteadexemption

    DeKalbCountyMillageRate of6.39mills with existing homesteadexemptions and HOST factor of47.3%

    $6,525,580 $6,786,928 $9,927,881

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    65/66

    Supplemental ProposedCityofBrookhavenAirportAreaRevenueAnalysis

    March 2012

  • 7/28/2019 CVI Brookhaven Feasibility Study

    66/66

    SupplementalProposedCityofBrookhavenAirportAreaRevenueAnalysis

    ThissupplementalanalysiswasundertakenattherequestofStateRepresentativeMikeJacobsto determine the estimated potential tax and fee revenue value that could be derived from a smallportionoftheareaoriginallyincludedinthestudyareaintheprimaryreport,RevenueandExpenditureEstimatesforaProposedCityofBrookhaven.Utilizingthesamedataandmethodologyusedtopreparetheprimaryreport,theestimatedamountofrevenuethatwouldbegeneratedbythesocalledairportareawascalculated.1

    It should be noted that much of this area is part of Peachtree DeKalb Airport and thus beingpublicproperty,wouldnotgeneratetaxrevenuetoamunicipalcorporation.Becausethereisverylittleresidentpopulationintheairportarea,therevenueestimatemethodologiesprovidedinthereportthataremostheavilydependentoncommercialpropertywereutilized.Includingpropertytaxes,removaloftheairportareawouldreducetheoverallrevenueestimatebyapproximately$126,000.Fordeterminingthepropertytaxportionofthisestimate,apropertytaxmillagerateof3.35millsandthe2011propertytaxdigestvalues,whichwerelowerthan2010values,wereused.

    The following table demonstrates the changes in the ratios of residential, commercial, andindustrial areas of the study area to the unincorporated area of DeKalb County with the Airport Arearemoved.

    RatioComparisonsPrimaryReportStudyAreaWithandWithoutAirportArea OriginalStudyArea (including

    AirportArea) StudyAreawithoutAirportAreaResidentialAV 14.67% 14.66%

    CommercialAV 12.41% 12.10%IndustrialAV 1.40% 1.31%

    A previous supplemental analysis, Supplemental Proposed City of Brookhaven Property TaxAnalysis,indicatedthatamunicipalmillagerateof3.35millsinthestudyareawouldgenerateanoverallrevenueestimatewhichexceedsestimatedexpendituresintheprimarystudyby$261,348.Subtractingthe estimated revenue loss resulting from removal of the airport area from this figure, results in ananticipatedsurplusof$135,348,beforetakingintoconsiderationanypossiblereductioninexpendituresthatmightresultfromremovaloftheairportarea.

    removal of

    the airport area would reduce the overall revenue estimate by approximately $126,000.

    3.35 mills

    anticipated surplus of $135,348,

    results in an