cultural heritage in regional networks regnet technological implementation plan – d12
TRANSCRIPT
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworksCultural Heritage in REGional NETworks
REGNETREGNETTechnological Implementation Plan –
D12
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
2Technological Implementation Technological Implementation Plan (TIP) – Final ReportPlan (TIP) – Final Report
Task 5.1: Development of a Technical Implementation Plan
Deliverable 12
Author: MOT
Partners involved: AIT, ONB, IMAC, TARX, MUS, SPAC, CC, IAT, ICCS, ZEUS, VALT
Period: April 2001 - March 2003
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
3
OutlineOutline
Purpose and Structure of the TIP
Methodology used to gather data
Data presentation and analysis
Final remarks
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
4
TIP – Purpose and structureTIP – Purpose and structure
Part 1: Overview (public)Executive summary/Overview of all results
Quantified data on the project
Assessment of the European interests
Expected project impact
Part 2: Description of each result (public)
Part 3: Intentions of the partners (confid.)Dissemination and use of the results
Quantified data for each partner’s main result
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
5TIP – Part 1 (public)TIP – Part 1 (public) - - Overview -Overview -
Network of web-based service centers dedicated to Cultural Heritage management across Europe15 Deliverables + 3 StudiesMore than 80 results usable outside or within the consortiumBroad dissemination and many use intentions for these outputs
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
6TIP – Part 1 (public)TIP – Part 1 (public) - - Overview of all results -Overview of all results -
A – Results usable outside the consortium
B – Results usable exclusively within the consortium
C – Case studies
64%
33%
3%
A
B
C
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
7TIP – Part 1 (public)TIP – Part 1 (public) - - Quantified data on the project -Quantified data on the project -
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
PD IN PS IN NS C NS P
current
future
PD IN – # of product innovations (commercial)
PS IN – # of process innovations
NS C – # of new services (commercial)
NS P – # of new services (public)
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
8TIP – Part 1 (public)TIP – Part 1 (public) - - Example for a product innovation -Example for a product innovation -
Infrastructure entry point: REGNET portalUser customization functions
Personal information synchronization
Internationalization
Multi-terminal support
Security
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
9TIP – Part 1 (public)TIP – Part 1 (public) - - Example for new services/products -Example for new services/products -
• Data Management• Information Retrieval• Services
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
10TIP – Part 1 (public)TIP – Part 1 (public) - - Example for new services/products -Example for new services/products -
Publishing
Knowledge Management
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
11TIP – Part 1 (public)TIP – Part 1 (public) - - Quantified data on the project -Quantified data on the project -
NM A – # of new methods (academic)
SBT – # of scientific breakthrough
TS – # of technical standards
EU Reg – # of EU regulations to which REGNET has contributed
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
NM A SBT TS EU Reg
current
future
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
12TIP – Part 1 (public)TIP – Part 1 (public) - Candidates for new - Candidates for new products -products -
PORTAL: Access to remote data entry, distributed search, e-business:
Data Entry & Search & Retrieval: Search over distributed meta data repositories connected to data stores
e-Shop, e-Auction, e-Procurement: e-commerce system allowing access to distributed product/service catalogues
Topic Map: Management of all metadata, terminologies, needed in the CH domain as well as in the e-business domain
E-Publishing: Allowing the production of personalized digital products based on standardized meta data and workflows
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
13TIP – Part 1 (public)TIP – Part 1 (public) - - Quantified data on the project -Quantified data on the project -
TRAIN – # of grantees/trainees including transnational exchange of personnel
PhDs – # of PhDs generated
INT Reg – # of International regulations to which REGNET has contributed
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
INT Reg PhDs TRAIN
current
future
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
14TIP – Part 1 (publishable)TIP – Part 1 (publishable) - - Assessment of the European interests -Assessment of the European interests -
Monitoring and creating jobs in the EU through networking of:creators in private/public sectors; Packagers and designers; Language and customization players; Publishers and distributors; Net services companies; Rights trading actors; Capital market players; Market enablers
Support of the production, use and distribution of European digital content and promotion of linguistic and cultural diversity on the global networks
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
15TIP – Part 1 (publishable)TIP – Part 1 (publishable) - - Expected project impact -Expected project impact -
Innovative and viable contents
Multinational and cross-sector partnerships
Accompanying measures addressing market awareness and dissemination
Market studies for visions, insight, challenges and opportunities
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
16TIP – Part 1 (publishable)TIP – Part 1 (publishable) - - Exploitation example MOT -Exploitation example MOT -
End-to-end e-Commerce wireless system in CH domain, reusable for other domains based on customers’ needsEuropean wide testbed for 3G services and novel wireless technologies“Toolkit” for development of Wireless Portals
Reduce cycle time consistently for WAP/Voice devicesProvide full support for customizationDevice-independent presentation and navigationTransparent to the developerPortability and scalability
XML-driven Web Sites expertise
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
17
Part 2 & 3 (public & conf.)Part 2 & 3 (public & conf.)
Part 2:What are the potential applications for this result?
Who are the end-users of this results?
What are the main innovative features/benefits?
Part 3:Timetable of the use and dissemination activities within the next 3 years after the end of the project
Foreseen collaborations with other entities
Economic impacts (table 3.2)
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
18
Final remarksFinal remarks
To do:Completion of eTIP and final TIP
<to be finished end of March 2003>
Thank you!