cube roots

26
Cube root estimates David Coulson, 2013 [email protected]

Upload: david-coulson

Post on 18-May-2015

628 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Simple procedures for approximating the cube root of a number

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cube roots

Cube root estimates

David Coulson, 2013

[email protected]

Page 2: Cube roots

To estimate the cube root of a number in the range 100-500.... 250

Page 3: Cube roots

250

Reduce it by a tenth... 225

To estimate the cube root of a number in the range 100-500....

Page 4: Cube roots

250

Reduce it by a tenth... 225

Divide it by 100... 2.25

To estimate the cube root of a number in the range 100-500....

Page 5: Cube roots

250

Reduce it by a tenth... 225

Divide it by 100... 2.25

...and add four. 6.25

To estimate the cube root of a number in the range 100-500....

Page 6: Cube roots

6.25

Correct value = 6.30

error = 0.8%

Page 7: Cube roots

Second example: 430

Reduce it by a tenth... 387

Divide it by 100... 3.87

Add four... 7.257.54 (4% error)

~

Page 8: Cube roots

300

Reduce it by a tenth... 270

Divide it by 100... 2.70

Add four... 6.706.69 (0.1% error)

Third example:

~

Page 9: Cube roots

100

Reduce it by a tenth... 90

Divide it by 100... 0.90

Add four... 4.904.64 (6% error)

Fourth example:

~

Page 10: Cube roots

Perc

ent e

rror

The technique works best at values close to 216.

Page 11: Cube roots

The technique comes from applying a straight line approximation to the cube curve in regions close to multiples of 3.

x=3k

Page 12: Cube roots

Substitute

x=3k

Page 13: Cube roots

Substitute

Page 14: Cube roots
Page 15: Cube roots

Substitute

Page 16: Cube roots

Substitute

Page 17: Cube roots
Page 18: Cube roots

In the case where k=1, the straight line is tangent at (3,27), and we have a reasonable approximation for the cube roots of numbers near 27.

Page 19: Cube roots

This version produces some very good estimates for cube roots in the range 10~50.

Page 20: Cube roots

(2.46, error 3%)

This version produces some very good estimates for cube roots in the range 10~50.

Dividing by 27 can be approximated as dividing by 30 and making the answer 10% bigger.

Page 21: Cube roots

(error 0.1%)

Alternatively, when the numerator and denominator are of similar size, you can adjust the values by the same amount to get numbers that are easier to process.

Page 22: Cube roots

However, one number in three is on the 3 times table.Therefore it’s often easy to divide by 27.

(2.76, error 1%)

Page 23: Cube roots

The case where k=2 shifts the tangent line up to (6, 216).

The formula benefits from numbers which are multiples of three because the derivative term 3x2 resonates with the x3 term for these numbers.

Page 24: Cube roots

This works well for numbers near 216, extending out as far as 100~500.

Approximating the denominator as 100 will often be good enough, but better results are obtained by reducing the numerator by ten percent first.

Page 25: Cube roots

What about other multiples of 3? Consider k=3.

This should be good in the region near 729.

Experimentation shows it is reliable between 500~1000.

K values above 3 produce tangent points greater than 1000.Cube roots for numbers above 1000 can be related to numbers in the range 1~10. Therefore k values bigger than 3 are redundant.

Page 26: Cube roots

[END]