ctc project coonamia to tarcoola>

© Australian Rail Track Corporation Limited 2013 Disclaimer:

This document has been prepared by ARTC for internal use and may not be relied on by any other party without ARTC’s prior written consent. Use of this document shall be subject to the terms of the relevant contract with ARTC.

ARTC and its employees shall have no liability to unauthorised users of the information for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of an unauthorised user using or relying upon the information in this document, whether caused by error, negligence, omission or

misrepresentation in this document.

This document is uncontrolled when printed. Authorised users of this document should visit ARTC’s intranet or extranet (www.artc.com.au) to access the latest version of this document.

CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>

End Stage Report

18/12/14 3.0

Template Status

Discipline: Engineering Category: Procedure - Template Related Procedure: EGP-20-01 Project Management Template number: EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report Date Reviewed: 03 Sep 13 Version: 1.0

End Stage Report 18/12/14 3.0 CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>

Engineering Procedure - Template of 13 EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report EGP-20-01 Project Management Date of last revision: 03 Sep 13 This document is uncontrolled when printed. See ARTC Intranet for latest version. Version 1.0

Contents

1 Purpose ................................................................................................. 4

2 Stage Objectives .................................................................................... 5

2.1 Product(s) Developed ........................................................................ 5

2.2 Time Performance (Milestones) ........................................................... 5

2.2.1 Incorrect Schedule Related Assumptions ..................................... 6

2.2.2 Common Schedule Factors ........................................................ 6

2.3 Costs Performance ............................................................................ 6

2.3.1 Incorrect Costing Assumptions .................................................. 6

2.3.2 Common Costing Factors .......................................................... 6

2.4 Quality Performance .......................................................................... 6

2.4.1 Incorrect Quality Assumptions ................................................... 7

2.4.2 Common Quality Factors .......................................................... 7

3 Approved Changes ................................................................................. 7

3.1 Statistics on Changes Received ........................................................... 7

3.2 Change Impact ................................................................................. 7

3.3 Statistics on Issues Received .............................................................. 8

3.4 Issues Impact................................................................................... 8

4 Lessons Learned .................................................................................... 8

5 Recommendations ................................................................................. 9

6 Appendix A .......................................................................................... 10

6.1 Stage 1 Coonamia to Stirling North Single Line Diagram ....................... 10

7 Appendix B .......................................................................................... 11

7.1 Stage 2 Spencer Junction to Tarcoola Single Line Diagram .................... 11

8 Appendix C .......................................................................................... 12

8.1 Financial Report .............................................................................. 12

9 Appendix D .......................................................................................... 13

9.1 Radio Link Configuration .................................................................. 13



Document Control

Client: Australian Rail Track Corporation

Project: CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola

Document Title: End Stage Report

Date Issued: 18/12/14

Revision: 2.0

Prepared by:

Purpose: To close out the CTC Project

Endorsed by:

Approved by: Budget Investment Committee

Date Approved: 18/12/14

Issued to: BIC

Revision History

Revision Date Issued To Description

1.0 26/11/14 Initial review

2.0 27/11/14 Operational and client review

3.0 18/12/14 BIC For Approval



1 Purpose Prior to this project Coonamia to Stirling North and Spencer Junction to Tarcoola were areas that operated on Manual Train Orders, a paper based system of safe working delivered via a voice radio handshake process between the Network Controller and the Train Driver or Track Worker.

Mineral traffic growth was driving the requirement for new train paths on the East West Corridor between Port Augusta and Tarcoola. This new demand was in addition to the growth experienced in intermodal traffic over recent years on this section. The IMX ore, and intermodal traffic growth and the Arrium Minerals (Western Plains) ore traffic had consumed the capacity available from the timetable in the corridor. Whilst this was positive for revenue it impacted on our ability to continue to deliver reliable operations with the existing system and hence would constrain our ability to grow the business.

Alternative means of delivering capacity had been evaluated and initially a restricted capability version of ATMS was chosen. Unfortunately the timeframe to deliver this form of ATMS was outside the required timeframe for a solution. As a result, to deliver extra capacity, simultaneously reduce pressure on network control; and improve safety, Centralised Traffic Control with mid-section or intermediate signals was installed from Coonamia to Stirling North and Spencer Junction to Tarcoola. The CTC Island at Port Augusta was interfaced to the two projects in order to provide a continuous CTC system from Adelaide to Tarcoola.

The original budget was fixed and the scope of works was amended to fit the budget which necessitated that intermediate signals at 8 locations between crossing loops could not be installed. This had the effect of reducing train capacity between Port Augusta and Tarcoola but this only had a minor impact given the overall improvement that CTC has provided as an outcome to the project.

The ability of the Infrastructure Services team in delivering the CTC system at 16 crossing loops and 12 intermediate locations between Coonamia and Tarcoola within a 17 month period is a testament to their professionalism, dedication and work ethics to get this significant project across the line.

The benefits of this project to our customers have been significant and have alleviated congestion on this section of the Interstate Network. The benefits include:

The existing headway of approximately 16 minutes between Dry Creek and Coonamia now extends to Spencer Junction from the previous 25 minute headway between Coonamia and Spencer Junction.

Flexibility of pathing enhanced between Port Germein and Spencer Junction.

Improved management of PN driver only operations.

Reduction in headway allocation between Spencer Junction and Tarcoola to approximately 20 minutes from the previous 25 minutes.

Flexibility in pathing between Spencer Junction and Tarcoola.

Security of the network by locking all sidings and network interface points requiring intervention by the Network Controller.

Visual notification of active level crossing operations.

The project was carried out in 2 stages, stage 1 was between Coonamia and Stirling North with an agreed budget of $2.6M, stage 2 was between Spencer Junction and Tarcoola with an agreed budget of $16.950M. Added to the overall budget was the expenditure incurred against the initial ATMS Voice Operating system ($500K) and the sunk costs for ATMS ($1.5M). Total budget for the project was $21,550,000.00.

The project received additional funds to cover the cost of increased scope of works under stage 2 and encountering sub surface rock at sites from Wirrappa to Tarcoola. A reasonable amount of money was allocated to the project under risk to cover encountering rock however unexpectedly a significant amount of sub surface rock was encountered that proved to be more extensive and harder than envisaged.

The decision to use the Telstra Next G network to control intermediate signal locations and the Coondambo crossing loop was taken early in the project as this was seen as the most cost



effective methodology to fit within the agreed budget. The issue of latency (time delay in milliseconds) causing drop out within the Next G network was discussed and evaluated with the decision to accept the risk and proceed with using the Telstra Next G Network. An identified risk mitigation was to incorporate time delays into the signal design to manage the latency of the Next G Network.

While the Next G Network is within specification for voice transmission it has since been proven that with data package transmission the incidence of drop out causing axle counter failure in a fail safe mode has increased, the axle counter failures; subject to confirmation of certain conditions; requires a reset from Network Control which is an encumbrance operationally.

A 5.8 GHz radio link was installed and tested at the intermediate signal location (Renton) between Kingoonya and Ferguson to determine the reliability of the link.

The testing of the radio link has been successful. The latency of the radio network is negligible and should significantly reduce the incidence of axle counter resets and a project has been set up and funded ($410,000) to install the radio link at all sites that are using the Next G Network to minimise the incidence of axle counter failure and Network Control intervention.

The project for installation of CTC between Coonamia and Tarcoola has been completed with the agreed scope of works delivered.

2 Stage Objectives

2.1 Product(s) Developed

Product Name Product Description Status

Stage 1 Installation of CTC between Coonamia and Stirling North

Complete

Stage 2 Installation of CTC between Spencer Junction and Tarcoola

Complete

2.2 Time Performance (Milestones) Tasks that were achieved within time estimates:

Stage 1, Coonamia to Port Augusta, commissioning of three crossing loops and intermediate locations were achieved.

Tasks delivered under time estimates:

Nil

Tasks that exceeded time estimates:

Long lead items - material delivery exceeded the supplier given timeframes.

The commissioning of Stage 2, (Port Augusta to Tarcoola) crossing Loops and intermediate locations exceeded the initial delivery timeframe by 12 months.

This was due to the following factors:-

o signal design changes and material procurement to accommodate additional starter signals, signal locations for starter signals, relocation of signal 54; extra point detection and roll out protection for goods sidings,

o relocation of Signal 54 at Spencer Junction to accommodate operational overlap requirements,

o extension of McLeay Goods Siding,

o weather (extreme heat),

o sub surface rock at nine crossing loop locations.



2.2.1 Incorrect Schedule Related Assumptions The schedule was implemented with the ‘best case’ scenario relating to staff, plant, contractors, weather and local conditions given an expected initial completion date of the 30th June 2013.

Contractors were engaged with the intention to reduce the project timeline. This assumption provided less timeframe reduction than envisaged.

Additional works to accommodate operational requirements (relocation of #54 signal at Spencer Junction and advance starter signals at all crossing loops with intermediate signal locations).

Discovery of significant areas of sub surface rock at nine crossing loops dramatically increased the construction time at each of those loops.

2.2.2 Common Schedule Factors Common schedule changes through the project were due to signalling scope and design changes as the project progressed and the discovery of sub surface rock at nine crossing loops all contributed to increase the overall project timeframe.

2.3 Costs Performance Costs that met or bettered agreed budgets:

Stage 1, $2.6M (Coonamia to Stirling North) was under budget by $175,669.00.

Costs that exceeded agreed budgets:

Stage 2, $16.950M (Port Augusta to Tarcoola) exceeded budget by $168,003.00.

2.3.1 Incorrect Costing Assumptions Stage 2 (Spencer Junction to Tarcoola) exceeded initial estimates due to:

Site construction work at nine crossing loops was significantly more than anticipated due to the extent and hardness of sub surface rock.

The number of axle counters was more than the initial concept signal design as it did not cover all scenarios for operational requirements.

Additional works to meet operational requirements, relocation of #54 signal at Spencer Junction to provide safety overlap and advance starter signals at all crossing loops with intermediate signal locations. Starter signals were required to comply with Network Operating Rules.

Extension of the McLeay Goods Loop, this was requested by the East West corridor to provide a ballast loading location north of Port Augusta.

2.3.2 Common Costing Factors A common costing factor for this project was the discovery of sub surface rock at nine crossing loops.

2.4 Quality Performance Outputs that met or exceeded quality requirements:

The processes to ensure quality outcomes of the train management system as detailed in ARTC standard ESC-21-02 Inspection and Testing of Signalling, Plans, Programs, Documentation and Packages met the Project Management Plan (PMP) objectives. Signalling Inspection and Test Plans along with Installation and Commissioning Work Plans were also produced to meet the quality requirements of the project.

Outputs that failed to meet quality requirements:



The Telstra Next G network did not meet the reliability requirements expected of the system due to latency issues with the network. The latency in the network caused ‘drop outs’ which affected the reliability of the CTC train management system. While the Next G Network is within specification for voice transmission it has since been proven that with data package transmission the incidence of drop out causing axle counter failure in a fail safe mode has increased.

2.4.1 Incorrect Quality Assumptions The Telstra Next G Network did not perform as expected with data package transmissions even though time delays were built into the signal design to compensate for the latency.

2.4.2 Common Quality Factors A common quality factor was the Telstra Next G Network.

3 Approved Changes

3.1 Statistics on Changes Received Approved Changes:

Signalling Design

o Increase in the number of Axle Counters from original estimate

o Relocation of signal 54 at Spencer junction to meet the overlap requirements for the Spencer Junction to Tent Hill block section.

o Advance Starter signals at crossing loops with intermediate signal locations to comply with Network Operating Rules.

o Goods siding extended at McLeay Crossing Loop

Scope

o Advance starter signals at crossing loops with intermediate locations

o Extension of the McLeay Crossing Loop goods siding

o Reduction in the number of intermediate locations

Timeframe

o Material delivery delays

o Project commissioning delays

o Sub surface rock at nine crossing loops

o Additional signal installations

Cost

o Sub surface rock increased construction costs of plant, labour and ancillary costs.

o Project delivery timeframe impacted the overall cost.

3.2 Change Impact Scope change extended the delivery timeframe and cost. (NcOP) (Starter Signals)

Scope change meant signal design changes that extended the delivery timeframe

Cost increase due to nine locations having sub surface rock. ($1,920,630.00)



3.3 Statistics on Issues Received Twenty issues were identified by the Project Manager for the project and were recorded in the CTC Project Issues register.

The majority of issues were concerned with scope changes and request for information from the Signalling Contractor.

All identified Project issues were closed out.

3.4 Issues Impact Stage 1 – Coonamia to Port Augusta

Material delivery delays – Delayed site work such that construction staff had to relocate to other loops while waiting for materials to arrive.

Rail Insulation – Delays to the installation of insulated spacers due to frozen rail clips.

Stage 2- Port Augusta to Tarcoola

Material Delivery Delays – Delayed site work such that construction staff had to relocate to other loops while waiting for materials to arrive.

Signal Configuration Change – the requirement for a 300 metre safety overlap between # 53 and #54 signals at Spencer Junction to allow shunting operations to continue while a train is travelling from Tent Hill to Spencer Junction.

Signal Configuration Change- the requirement for Advance Starter Signals to be installed at crossing loops for line sections that had Intermediate Signals.

Signalling Contractor – delays for the delivery of designs for construction works, communication and design principle issues.

Sub Surface Rock – Affected trenching at nine crossing loops – significant impact on cost and delivery timeframe (The extent and hardness of the rock was not anticipated at the time of original scope and cost estimate).

4 Lessons Learned

Project Area Lesson Learned Required Action

Project Process Improve the transition from a concept proposal to allow for a detailed scope and cost to be produced prior to project initiation and budget approval.

Follow EGP 20-01.

Project Process Review the project proposal against the Operational Specification for compliance with the train safe working system applicable to the location of the project.

Review prior to project commitment.

Project Process Use of a common estimating tool (database v spreadsheet) to improve project estimating.

Investigate.

Signalling Design Ensure the contracted signal design organisation agree to and comply with the ARTC directives relating to signal design principles for the required project.

Review prior to contract engagement.

Technical Processes Provision of dedicated safe worker/s for all commissioning’s.

Actioned

Contract Management Scope of works to be clear and concise as possible with no anomalies and responsibilities and accountabilities defined.

Review scope of works prior to contract engagement.

Quality Management Interface works between Signalling Infrastructure and Track and Civil Infrastructure required better coordination.

Review prior to project commencement.



5 Recommendations That the Budget Investment Committee approves this End of Stage Report and the CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola is closed out.



6 Appendix A

6.1 Stage 1 Coonamia to Stirling North Single Line Diagram

Rev Date Revision Description

Sheet No.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

A

B

C

D

E

F

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

A

B

C

D

E

F

AUSTRALIAN RAIL TRACK CORPORATION LTD

Designed

Checked Ind. Rev.

Approv.

© [2010] Australian Rail Track Corporation Ltd.

Scale:

NA

Used on / Next higher assembly:

Alternate DMS number:

Filename:

ASSEMBLY

ARTCW3090128.DWG

Drawing standard in accordance with PP-117.4.3

TO

S

TIR

LIN

G N

OR

TH

ARTCW3090128

1 of 1

ARTC APPROVAL

Designing By:

Drawn

Checked

Review

Signature

Ind.Rev. Company Ind.Rev. Name

Approved By

Approval Date

Signed:

R.G.

T.O.

ARTC (SC)

SIRI HATTOTUWA

03/02/2010

TO

T

EN

T H

IL

L

PT. AUGUSTA PASSENGER LOOP

SALT LAKE

OV

ER

PA

SS

HIG

HW

AY

89.968km

ST

IR

LIN

G

90.266km

RD

HO

SP

IT

AL

90.767km

RD

CA

RLT

ON

91.580km

PA

RA

DE

91.561km

23

17

27

MAINLINE

CROSSING LOOP (1108m)

24

24

E

A

18

18

A

19

19

91.647km

91.692km

91.882km

92.100km

OV

ER

PA

SS

FLIN

DE

RS

T

CE

92.149km

OV

ER

PA

SS

JE

RV

OIS

S

T

92.360km

OV

ER

PA

SS

HIG

HW

AY

92.410km

33

33

E

92.742km

92.823km

92.867km

ST

TA

SS

IE

28

A

37

29

MAINLINE

29

93.020km

92.940km

34

34

34

H

E

93.135km

(DWARF)

43

43

E

38

38

40

A

46

95km

41

95.086km

95.145km

95.170km

39

39

A

95.228km95.294km

44

42

95.320km

52

51

96

54

53

98

9

5

.

8

3

7

k

m

9

7

.

9

8

0

k

m

9

5

.

7

2

0

k

m

9

7

.

8

2

0

k

m

TO

W

HY

ALL

A

PT. AUGUSTA CROSSING LOOP

SPENCER JUNCTION

YARD

B

R

I

D

G

E


ARTC MAINLINE

PICHI RICHI MAINLINE

TO

C

OO

NA

MIA

TO

P

T A

UG

US

TA

PT. GERMEIN

7

A

16

20

MAINLINE

GOODS SIDING


3

16

26.900km

24.738km

13.41km

24.84km

26.841km

25.06km

MAMBRAY CREEK

29.394km

23.918km

SO

UT

HE

RN

A

CC

ES

S

PT

G

ER

ME

IN

OV

ER

PA

SS

HIG

HW

AY

1

OLD

81.915km

RD

WILM

IN

GT

ON

83.082km

RD

QU

OR

N

83.058km

84.705km

TC

E

NO

RT

H

3

84.687km

85.360km

13

8

9

8

13

E

A

TO WILKATANA

TO

P

OW

ER

S

TA

TIO

N

HA

RR

IS

85.526km

ST

FO

OT

NE

R

87.150km

RD

14E

14

85.850km

88.495km

STIRLING NORTH

88

89

ARTC MAINLINE

PICHI RICHI MAINLINE

A

9

(A1_SHEET)

14

13

21

22.531km

4

4

E

24.74km

26.746km

23

23

E

26.901km

24

30

34.7km

34

33

720

MAINLINE


3

43.927km

44.02km

45.938km

47.550km

41

42.300km

4

4

E

43.929km

23

23

E

45.954km

24

48

45.841km

60.1km

60

59

7

20

MAINLINE


3

70.446km

70.534km

72.473km

74.976km

68.919km

RD

MA

IN

N

OR

TH

67

68.022km

4

4

E

70.448km

72.378km

23

23

E

72.476km

24

74

WINNINOWIE

83

TO

S

TIR

LIN

G N

OR

TH

TO

W

IN

NIN

OW

IE

A 29/7/13 CTC Installation - Coonamia to Pt Augusta (I.S. 19/6/13)

T.O. M.F. S.H. D.B.

A


Engineering Procedure - Template Page 11 of 13 EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report EGP-20-01 Project Management Date of last revision: 03 Sep 13 This document is uncontrolled when printed. See ARTC Intranet for latest version. Version 1.0

7 Appendix B

7.1 Stage 2 Spencer Junction to Tarcoola Single Line Diagram

ARTC APPROVAL

Sheet No.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

A

B

C

D

E

F

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

A

B

C

D

E

F

SJC-S0043

AUSTRALIAN RAIL TRACK CORPORATION LTD

© [2014] Australian Rail Track Corporation Ltd.

Scale:

NA

Used on / Next higher assembly:

Alternate DMS number:Filename:

SJC-S0043.DWG

Designed

Checked

Review

Signature

Ind.Rev. Company Ind.Rev. Name

Approved By

Approval Date

Signed:

SPENCER JUNCTION TO TARCOOLA

SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM

Rev Date Revision Description

Designed

Checked Ind. Rev.

Approv.

Drawing standard in accordance with EGP-04-01 & EGP-04-02

ARTC

MAINLINE

120.622km118.644km

TENTHILL


MAINLINE

274.609km

PIMBA


272.464km

WO

OM

ER

AR

D

148.910km

ST

UA

RT

HW

Y

115.860km

MAINLINE

311.983km

309.791km

BURANDO


118.428km

118.728km

7

120.573km120.880km

123.439km

20

MAINLINE

HESSO


143

3

7

4E

150.006km

20

MAINLINE

BOOKALOO


172.600km

173

3

7

23

23E

24

182

20

MAINLINE

211.147km

209.060km

McLEAY


206.347km

207

209.126km

3

7

4

4E

211.069km

211.368km

23

23E

24

214.018km

214

20

208.829km

MAINLINE

242.900km

240.918km

WIRRAPPA


238.050km

237

240.687km

240.990km

3

7

242.829km

243.200km

23

23E

24

245.765km

246

20

269.780km

267

272.280km

272.692km

13

14

14E

274.538km274.838km

23

23E

24

277.338km

278

20

306.995km

307

309.860km

13

7

14

14E

309.558km

311.915km

312.215km

23

23E

24

314.696km

314

20

MAINLINE

343.001km

341.018km

WIRRAMINNA


337.995km

337

340.816km

341.121km

13

7

14

14E

342.955km343.252km

23

23E

24

345.712km

344

20

MAINLINE

366.541km

364.500km

COONDAMBO


361.778km

361

364.596km

3

7

4

4E

364.296km

366.451km

366.751km

24

369.269km

370

20

MAINLINE

394.671km

392.703km

KULTANABY


389.800km

391

392.501km

392.801km

3

7

4

4E

394.573km394.873km

23

23E

24

397.570km

396

20

MAINLINE

426.860km

424.870km

KINGOONYA


422.020km

423

424.640km

424.940km

3

7

4

4E

426.762km427.062km

23

23E

24

430.312km

430

20

MAINLINE

469.690km

467.634km

FERGUSON


464.774km

465

467.713km

13

7

14

14E

467.457km

469.617km

469.917km

24

472.391km

472

20

SPENCER JUNCTION

TO

M

cLE

AY

TO

B

OO

KA

LO

O

TO

B

UR

AN

DO

TO

P

IM

BA

TO

K

ULT

AN

AB

Y

TO

C

OO

ND

AM

BO

TO

T

AR

CO

OLA

374.968km

ST

UA

RT

HW

Y

OV

ER

BR

ID

GE

23E

23

23

23E

255.350km

255

256

283.650km

283

284

295

296

326.000km

325

326

448.150km

447

448

97.820km

447.850km

325.700km

255.050km 283.350km

296.900km

296.600km

MASON CREEK

PALPINNA

RENTON

7

Q1

Q4 Q6

Q7

Q8Q9

Q10 Q11 Q12

Q13

Q14

Q15

Q16 Q17

Q18 Q19 Q20

Q21

Q22

Q24

Q23

Q25

Q26

Q28Q27

Q29Q30

Q31

Q32 Q33

Q34

Q35

Q36

Q38 Q40

Q39 Q41 Q42

Q43 Q44 Q45

Q47

Q48

Q49

Q51

Q50

Q52 Q53

Q54

Q55

Q56 Q57Q58

Q60

Q61

Q62

Q63

Q64

Q66

Q68

Q69Q70

Q71

4

33

Q72

Q73

Q74 Q75

4

Q76

Q77

Q78

Q80Q82

Q81 Q83

33

Q84

Q85

Q86

Q87 Q88 Q89

Q90

Q91

Q92

Q93

Q94

Q95

Q96 Q974

Q100 Q101

Q102

Q103 Q104

Q105

Q106

Q108

Q107 Q109 Q110

Q111 Q112 Q113

Q114

Q115

Q116

Q117

Q118

Q119

Q120Q121

Q124 Q125 Q126

Q127

Q128

Q129

Q130

Q132

Q131

Q133 Q134

33

Q135

Q136

Q137Q138

Q1394

Q140 Q141

Q142 Q144

Q145

Q146Q148

Q147Q149 Q150

33

18

A

18

2021

A

21

TARCOOLA

TO KALGOORLIE


CAR MAINLINE

TAR MAINLINE

TO ALICE SPRINGS

503.379km

501

487.050km

487.350km

500.61km

13

503.110km

9

7

14E

503.472km

14

14H

503.420km

508.5km

508

506

34

24

505.624km

505.506km

23E

23

TO

F

ER

GU

SO

N

5

1

0

.

8

5

0

k

m

NORTHGATE BLOCK POINT

487

488

WILGENA

4

33

503.868km 504.229km

504.360km

505.44km

505.435km

505.39km

505.312km

505.310km

503.327km

11

12

15

Q151

Q152

Q153 Q154

Q156

Q155

Q157

Q158

Q159 Q161

Q160

Q162

Q163

Q164Q165

Q166

Q168

Q167

Q169

Q171

Q172

Q173

Q174

177.704km

177.63km

177.93km

180.43km

272.703km

272.631km

175.720km

175.508km

175.808km

176.465km

147.031km145.056km142.330km

144.823km

145.124km

146.965km147.269km

33

EUCOLO

LAKE HART

Q175 Q170

54

53

95.720km

END CTC

START TOW

END TOW

START CTC

END GW

TOW

273.122km

210.206km

210.928km

242.646km

311.083km

342.650km

393.495km

426.55km

468.072km

468.582km

START GW

TOW

Q65

Q67

1211

12

11

12

12

11

11

12

12

11

12

11

98

Q2 Q3

117

3

4

4E 23E

23

24

124

4

23E

23

24

150

4E

4

Q5

4

4E

Q46

Q79

Q143

Q37

Q

1

7

6

Q177

511.0km

364.826km

176.521km

272.758km

273.070km

210.240km

210.931km

242.780km

311.043km

311.086km

342.638km

342.688km

468.135km

468.524km

503.910km

504.186km

505.322km

96.020km

04/08/14

05/08/14

05/08/14

T.OH

504.441km

M.FORBES

ARTCS.HATTUTOWA

05/08/14

ORIGINAL_SIGNED

D.BUTTON

ORIGINAL_SIGNED

11

A

11

A

12

A

12

A

11

A

12

A

12

A

11

A

11

A

12

A

12

A

11

A

12

A

11

A

12

A

15

A



8 Appendix C

8.1 Financial Report

1

2012 - 2013 Financial Year

ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR YTD ACT/FOR BUD VAR

MAJOR WORKS

860901 772 CTC Installation - Coonamia to Pt Augusta 258,879 - (258,879) 337,607 311,230 (26,377) 705,907 788,000 82,093 591,259 700,000 108,741 222,507 100,000 (122,507) 245,272 160,000 (85,272) 2,361,430 2,361,430 2,600,000 238,570

860902 772 CTC Installation - Spencer Jct to Tarcoola 606,642 - (606,642) 330,611 586,500 255,889 595,477 906,663 311,186 1,700,128 750,000 (950,128) 1,463,607 500,000 (963,607) 947,452 500,000 (447,452) 5,643,917 5,643,917 14,200,000 8,556,083

860900 995 Voice ATMS Operating - 80,000 80,000 40,971 40,000 (971) 35,000 40,000 5,000 45,000 40,000 (5,000) 43,779 40,000 (3,779) 42,245 40,000 (2,245) 206,995 206,995 500,000 293,005

TOTAL: 865,521 80,000 (785,521) 709,189 937,730 228,541 1,336,384 1,734,663 398,279 2,336,386 1,490,000 (846,386) 1,729,893 640,000 (1,089,893) 1,234,969 700,000 (534,969) 8,212,342 8,212,342 17,300,000 9,087,658

Actual / Forecast Variance %

Coonamia to Port Augusta 0% 8% 10% 16% 123% 53% Port Augusta to Tarcoola 0% 44% 34% 127% 193% 89%

Voice ATMS Operating 100% 2% 13% 13% 9% 6%


ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR

MAJOR WORKS

860901 772 CTC Installation - Coonamia to Pt Augusta 12,823 - (12,823) 6,266 - (6,266) - - - 43,812 - (43,812) - - - - - -

860902 772 CTC Installation - Spencer Jct to Tarcoola 1,351,004 780,681 (570,323) 1,390,095 1,300,000 (90,095) 1,525,241 1,350,000 (175,241) 1,542,034 1,300,000 (242,034) 1,030,645 1,200,000 169,355 917,670 884,339 (33,331)

860900 995 Voice ATMS Operating 82,175 50,000 (32,175) 41,618 50,000 8,382 40,000 50,000 10,000 40,000 50,000 10,000 40,000 50,000 10,000 40,000 48,859 8,859

TOTAL: 1,446,001 830,681 (615,320) 1,437,980 1,350,000 (87,980) 1,565,241 1,400,000 (165,241) 1,625,846 1,350,000 (275,846) 1,070,645 1,250,000 179,355 957,670 933,198 (24,472)


Coonamia to Port Augusta 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Port Augusta to Tarcoola 73% 7% 13% 19% 14% 4%


ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR PROJ TD ACT/FOR BUD VAR

MAJOR WORKS

860901 772 CTC Installation - Coonamia to Pt Augusta - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2,424,331 2,424,331 2,600,000 175,669

860902 772 CTC Installation - Spencer Jct to Tarcoola 1,344,640 398,788 (945,852) 807,222 433,991 (373,231) 440,131 200,000 (240,131) 351,824 350,000 (1,824) 472,017 357,401 (114,616) 287,347 220,000 (67,347) 17,103,787 17,103,787 16,950,000 (153,787)

860900 995 Voice ATMS Operating - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 490,788 490,788 500,000 9,212

ATMS Sunk Costs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,490,589 1,500,000 9,411

TOTAL: 1,344,640 398,788 (945,852) 807,222 433,991 (373,231) 440,131 200,000 (240,131) 351,824 350,000 (1,824) 472,017 357,401 (114,616) 287,347 220,000 (67,347) 20,018,906 21,509,494 21,550,000 40,506





ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR PROJ TD ACT/FOR BUD VAR

MAJOR WORKS

860901 772 CTC Installation - Coonamia to Pt Augusta - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2,424,331 2,424,331 2,600,000 175,669

860902 772 CTC Installation - Spencer Jct to Tarcoola 14,216 50,000 35,784 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17,118,003 17,118,003 16,950,000 (168,003)

860900 995 Voice ATMS Operating - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 490,788 490,788 500,000 9,212

ATMS Sunk Costs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,490,589 1,500,000 9,411

TOTAL: 14,216 50,000 35,784 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20,033,122 21,523,710 21,550,000 26,290




Infrastructure Services - CTC Project - Coonamia to Tarcoola31st July 2014

APR-13 MAY-13 JUN-13 12/13 TOTAL

JOB No.

ACT DESCRIPTIONJUL-13 AUG-13 SEP-13

JOB No.

ACT DESCRIPTIONJAN-13 FEB-13 MAR-13

JOB No.

ACT DESCRIPTIONJAN-14 FEB-14

SEP-14 OCT-14

OCT-13 NOV-13 DEC-13

MAR-14 APR-14

JOB No.

ACT DESCRIPTIONJUL-14 AUG-14 NOV-14 DEC-14 PROJECT TOTAL

MAY-14 Jun-14 PROJECT TOTAL



9 Appendix D

9.1 Radio Link Configuration

LAN

Other Devices being Monitored

LAN

Distant Signal Location (Site A)

Microlok

RS232/422LAN

RS90

0 Sw

itch EDW-100

I/O Link

FAdC via Fibre and Nokia System

Site A

FAdC

RS900 Switch

Site B

Nokia System Nokia System

RS900 Switch

Ethernet over 2 Mb Trib of 34 Mb PDH System

LAN

LAN

LAN

Sing

le M

ode

Fibr

e

LAN

Other Devices being Monitored

LAN

Distant Signal Location (Site B)

Microlok

RS232/422LAN

RS90

0 Sw

itch EDW-100

I/O Link

FAdC

Single Mode Fibre

TITLE:Sheet 6 of 10

20/ REV DESCRIPTION DESIGN CHECK APPRDATE

PROJECT:

Vital Axle Counter Communication Link

Spencer Juntion to Tarcoola CTC

20/1/13 Draft PH

Serial Server

Microlok

Pimba Distant West

Switch

Solar Reg

A/D Monitor

LAN

FAdC

Serial Server

LAN

LAN

Diag Serial

LAN

LAN

Eucolo

Switch

Solar Reg

A/D Monitor

LAN

FAdC

Serial Server

LAN

LAN

Diag Serial

Next GVPN Client

LAN

LAN

Phoenix Serial

LAN

Lake Hart

Switch

Solar Reg

A/D Monitor

LAN

FAdC

LAN

LAN

Diag Serial

Next GVPN Server

LAN

LAN

Microlok

Burando Distant East

Switch

Solar Reg

LAN

FAdC

Serial Server

LAN

LAN

Diag Serial

LAN

LAN

Telstra Network

NextG Network

Pt Augusta

Telstra Network

BDSL

Railway Communications Network - E1

Fibre Optic CableFibre Optic

Cable

Microlok Microlok

A/D Monitor

LAN LAN

IPsec VPN IPsec VPN IPsec VPN

Serial Server

Microlok

Pimba Distant West

Switch

Solar Reg

A/D Monitor

LAN

FAdC

Serial Server

LAN

LAN

Diag Serial

LAN

LAN

Eucolo

Switch

Solar Reg

A/D Monitor

LAN

FAdC

Serial Server

LAN

LAN

Diag Serial

Next GVPN Client

LAN

LAN

Phoenix Serial

LAN

Lake Hart

Switch

Solar Reg

A/D Monitor

LAN

FAdC

LAN

LAN

Diag Serial

Next GVPN Server

LAN

LAN

Microlok

Burando Distant East

Switch

Solar Reg

LAN

FAdC

Serial Server

LAN

LAN

Diag Serial

LAN

LAN

Railway Communications Network - E1

Fibre Optic Cable

Fibre Optic Cable

Microlok Microlok

A/D Monitor

LAN LAN

AES 128

Pimba Comms HutBurando Comms Hut

AES 128AES 128

860900 ARTC Overheads 500860901 CTC Coonamia Pt Augusta 2500860902 CTC Spc Jct - Tar 15750860905 Contingency 1300860903 ATMS Authority 1000860904 ATMS Authority Sunk Costs 500860905860906860907

BIC SubmissionAugust September October November December January ebruar

860901 CTC Coonamia Pt Augusta 12,858 171 37 250 350860902 CTC Spc Jct - Tar 2,600 42 400 400

Total 20,000 64 105 100 204 -110 866 938

-$500

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$ '0

00

CTC Coonamia to Tarcoola Project Phasing

BIC Submission

Varied Budget

Actuals

Varied budget tracks BIC submission until Jan 2014

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

$'00

0

CTC Coonamia to Tarcoola Cumulative Project

BIC Submission

Varied Budget

Actuals

Varied budget tracks BIC submission until Jan 2014

ctc project coonamia to tarcoola>

Documents