crime victims: an introduction to victimology sixth edition
DESCRIPTION
Crime Victims: An Introduction to Victimology Sixth Edition. By Andrew Karmen Chapter Twelve: Repaying Victims. How are Victims Repaid?. 1. Offender Pays—Preferred 2. Civil Suit 3. Insurance Companies 4. Victim Compensation Program 5. Profits from Notorious Criminals. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
11
Crime Victims: An Introduction to Crime Victims: An Introduction to VictimologyVictimology
Sixth EditionSixth EditionBy Andrew KarmenBy Andrew Karmen
Chapter Twelve:Chapter Twelve:
Repaying VictimsRepaying Victims
22
How are Victims Repaid?How are Victims Repaid?
1. Offender Pays—Preferred1. Offender Pays—Preferred 2. Civil Suit2. Civil Suit 3. Insurance Companies3. Insurance Companies 4. Victim Compensation Program4. Victim Compensation Program 5. Profits from Notorious Criminals5. Profits from Notorious Criminals
33
Restitution By OffenderRestitution By Offender
Return of stolen goodsReturn of stolen goods
Equivalent amounts of moneyEquivalent amounts of money
Performs direct servicesPerforms direct services
44
Restitution By OffenderRestitution By Offender
Types of RestitutionTypes of Restitution
– Community ServiceCommunity Service
– Symbolic Restitution Symbolic Restitution
– Creative RestitutionCreative Restitution
55
Rise/Fall/Rediscovery of Rise/Fall/Rediscovery of RestitutionRestitution
Code of Hammurabi, 1775 B.C.Code of Hammurabi, 1775 B.C.
Roman LawRoman Law
Early AmericaEarly America
Courts system: “crimes against the state”Courts system: “crimes against the state”
66
Rise/Fall/Rediscovery of Rise/Fall/Rediscovery of RestitutionRestitution
1982: Presidents Task Force on Victims and 1982: Presidents Task Force on Victims and Crime—Recommendation for Restitution Crime—Recommendation for Restitution paid by offenderspaid by offenders
1994: Mandatory restitution for sexual 1994: Mandatory restitution for sexual assault and domestic violence—federal lawassault and domestic violence—federal law
Courts in every state now have right to order Courts in every state now have right to order restitutionrestitution
77
Restitution By OffenderRestitution By Offender
Reimbursement CoversReimbursement Covers
– Medical and counseling costsMedical and counseling costs– Replacement of propertyReplacement of property– Lost wages due to injuriesLost wages due to injuries– Other direct costsOther direct costs– Funeral expendituresFuneral expenditures
88
Purposes of RestitutionPurposes of Restitution
1. Repay Victims1. Repay Victims 2. Rehabilitate Offenders2. Rehabilitate Offenders 3. Reconciliation3. Reconciliation 4. Means of Punishing4. Means of Punishing
– First to incarcerate to repay debt to societyFirst to incarcerate to repay debt to society– Second is to make efforts to repaySecond is to make efforts to repay
– Incarceration and Restitution Not CompatibleIncarceration and Restitution Not Compatible
99
Restitution By OffenderRestitution By Offender
Opportunities for Restitution –Figure 12.1, page Opportunities for Restitution –Figure 12.1, page 315315
Very small percentage receive restitution (Figure Very small percentage receive restitution (Figure 12.2, page 316: Funneling or Shrinkage: The 12.2, page 316: Funneling or Shrinkage: The Leaky Net)Leaky Net)
Economic RealitiesEconomic Realities Evaluation of Restitution Programs:Evaluation of Restitution Programs:
– Victim oriented—make victims wholeVictim oriented—make victims whole– Offender oriented—rehabilitateOffender oriented—rehabilitate– System oriented—reduces costs of incarcerationSystem oriented—reduces costs of incarceration
No consensus on how to evaluateNo consensus on how to evaluate
1010
Imposition of RestitutionImposition of Restitution
Ordered in small proportion of violent Ordered in small proportion of violent crimes:crimes:– Murder 8%Murder 8%– Rape and Robbery 12%Rape and Robbery 12%– Aggravated Assault 18%Aggravated Assault 18%
Higher for Property CrimesHigher for Property Crimes
Burglaries 24%Burglaries 24%
Fraud 35%Fraud 35%
1111
Civil Court RemediesCivil Court Remedies
Victims can pursue offenders in civil courtVictims can pursue offenders in civil court
Tort Law—private wrongsTort Law—private wrongs Plaintiff—victimsPlaintiff—victims Punitive Damages—sanctions to punish Punitive Damages—sanctions to punish
offender (money)offender (money) Compensatory Damages—actual lossesCompensatory Damages—actual losses
1212
Civil Court ProcessCivil Court Process
Plaintiff files complaint (pleadings), noting Plaintiff files complaint (pleadings), noting jurisdictional issues and causes for actionjurisdictional issues and causes for action
Summons served to defendant and must Summons served to defendant and must respond within 30 daysrespond within 30 days
Discovery processDiscovery process Usually occurs after a criminal trialUsually occurs after a criminal trial ““Preponderance of Evidence”—51%Preponderance of Evidence”—51%
1313
Civil Court ProcessCivil Court Process
ChallengesChallenges
– Takes years to repayTakes years to repay– Victim may counter-sue for harassmentVictim may counter-sue for harassment– Good attorneys more important than factsGood attorneys more important than facts– Most criminals do not have resources to pay a Most criminals do not have resources to pay a
judgment ordered in civil courtjudgment ordered in civil court
1414
33rdrd Party Lawsuits Party Lawsuits
See Examples in ChapterSee Examples in Chapter Suing BusinessSuing Business
– Negligence created opportunityNegligence created opportunity– Did not act to prevent foreseeable crimeDid not act to prevent foreseeable crime
Disregarded complaintsDisregarded complaints Did not post warningsDid not post warnings
Most 3Most 3rdrd party lawsuits brought by rape victims party lawsuits brought by rape victims
1515
33rdrd Party Lawsuits Party Lawsuits
Suing GovernmentSuing Government– Standard is “gross negligence”Standard is “gross negligence”– Sovereign immunitySovereign immunity– MalfeasanceMalfeasance– NonfeasanceNonfeasance– Wrongful escapeWrongful escape– Failure to warnFailure to warn– Wrongful releaseWrongful release
1616
Collecting Insurance Collecting Insurance ReimbursementsReimbursements
Most insurance policies reimburse victims:Most insurance policies reimburse victims:– Life InsuranceLife Insurance– Home Owners InsuranceHome Owners Insurance– Disability InsuranceDisability Insurance– Auto InsuranceAuto Insurance– Lost Wages Insurance—Workman’s CompLost Wages Insurance—Workman’s Comp
1717
Victim Compensation ProgramsVictim Compensation Programs
Government programs for social problemsGovernment programs for social problems– ““New Frontier” and “Great Society”New Frontier” and “Great Society”– RationalesRationales
Shared Risk RationaleShared Risk Rationale Government Liability RationaleGovernment Liability Rationale Social Welfare Approach—Social JusticeSocial Welfare Approach—Social Justice Political RealitiesPolitical Realities
1818
Victim Compensation ProgramsVictim Compensation Programs
VOCA—Victims of Crime Act, 1984VOCA—Victims of Crime Act, 1984– First established compensation funds through First established compensation funds through
fines, penalties and forfeituresfines, penalties and forfeitures– 1993—Every state had such a fund1993—Every state had such a fund
How Funds OperateHow Funds OperateCompensate only “innocent victims”Compensate only “innocent victims”
Serious crimes only—injury, trauma, deathSerious crimes only—injury, trauma, deathDo not replace goods unless critical—elderlyDo not replace goods unless critical—elderly
Only “Out of Pocket” expenses reimbursedOnly “Out of Pocket” expenses reimbursed
1919
Victim Compensation Programs Victim Compensation Programs ContinuedContinued
Will not pay if insurance paysWill not pay if insurance pays No double compensationNo double compensation Restitution is subtracted from awardRestitution is subtracted from award Groups can receive award if families of DUI or Groups can receive award if families of DUI or
Domestic ViolenceDomestic Violence Groups ExcludedGroups Excluded
– Police, fire, parolees, probationers, prisonersPolice, fire, parolees, probationers, prisoners– ““Pain and Suffering” paid in some statesPain and Suffering” paid in some states– In 1980—only victims facing financial hardships were In 1980—only victims facing financial hardships were
eligibleeligible
2020
Victim Compensation Programs Victim Compensation Programs ContinuedContinued
How to Evaluate? Process and ImpactHow to Evaluate? Process and Impact Process Evaluation—how program Process Evaluation—how program
operates, productivity and costs and operates, productivity and costs and decision-making patternsdecision-making patterns
1988 study1988 study– 62% from local fines and forfeitures62% from local fines and forfeitures– 23% from taxes23% from taxes– 15% from VOCA15% from VOCA
2121
Victim Compensation Programs Victim Compensation Programs ContinuedContinued
Process Evaluation:Process Evaluation:Most claims for DUI, Homicides, rapes, robberies Most claims for DUI, Homicides, rapes, robberies
and child abuseand child abuse
Time for processing claims—1-24 monthsTime for processing claims—1-24 months
1996: U.S. paid out $250 Million to violent crime 1996: U.S. paid out $250 Million to violent crime victimsvictims
#1 Assault Victims—47%#1 Assault Victims—47%
#2 Child Sex Abuse—12%#2 Child Sex Abuse—12%
2222
Victim Compensation Programs Victim Compensation Programs ContinuedContinued
Impact Evaluation—Impact Evaluation—– No evidence program is encouraging victims to No evidence program is encouraging victims to
report and cooperate with CJ systemreport and cooperate with CJ system– Not reducing public discontent with CJ system, Not reducing public discontent with CJ system,
provoked additional frustrationsprovoked additional frustrations– ¾ of those applying will not again if victimized¾ of those applying will not again if victimized– This is only an exercise of “ symbolic politics”This is only an exercise of “ symbolic politics”– Public supports program but has no Public supports program but has no
understanding of victim dissatisfactionunderstanding of victim dissatisfaction
2323
Confiscating Profits from Notorious Confiscating Profits from Notorious CriminalsCriminals
Read examples in chapterRead examples in chapter Son of Sam and Dog Day AfternoonSon of Sam and Dog Day Afternoon 1977: New York passed “Son of Sam Laws” 1977: New York passed “Son of Sam Laws”
preventing criminals from making money from preventing criminals from making money from writing books or movieswriting books or movies
1981: U.S. Supreme Court overturned based on 1981: U.S. Supreme Court overturned based on free speech limitationsfree speech limitations
Laws changed to give all assets of criminals to Laws changed to give all assets of criminals to family of victims—no mention of royalties or family of victims—no mention of royalties or moviesmovies
2424
Key TermsKey TermsCommunity ServiceCommunity Service Symbolic restitutionSymbolic restitution Creative restitutionCreative restitution
TortsTorts Funneling or shrinkageFunneling or shrinkage Punitive damagesPunitive damages
Compensatory damagesCompensatory damages DiscoveryDiscovery InterrogatoriesInterrogatories
Preponderance of Preponderance of evidenceevidence
Default judgmentDefault judgment Pain and sufferingPain and suffering
NegligenceNegligence Sovereign immunitySovereign immunity NonfeasanceNonfeasance
MalfeasanceMalfeasance
Gross negligenceGross negligence Shared risk rationaleShared risk rationale Government liability Government liability rationalerationale
Social welfare Social welfare approachapproach
Social justice rationaleSocial justice rationale Symbolic politicsSymbolic politics