court funding task force
DESCRIPTION
Court Funding Task Force. October 7, 2002. Court Funding – Recommendations from the Past. 1972 – Citizen’s Conference on Courts “…courts should be part of one state system and the costs borne by the state” 1985 – Judicial Administration Comm. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
-
Court Funding Task ForceOctober 7, 2002
-
Court Funding Recommendations from the Past1972 Citizens Conference on Courtscourts should be part of one state system and the costs borne by the state
1985 Judicial Administration Comm.all salaries of superior and district court judges should be paid by state
-
Recommendations from the Past (contd)1985 Judicial Administration Comm.salaries of superior court commissioners and court administrators should be paid by the stateall pro tem costs should be paid by the statethe state should pay part of indigent criminal defense
-
Recommendations from the Past (contd)1985 Judicial Administration Comm.
Legislature should increase civil filing fees at all court levels
adopt a process for estimating fiscal impact on local courts/governments
-
Recommendations from the Past (contd)1988 Judicial Council Task Force on Courts of Limited JurisdictionIncrease PSEA assessment to 100% of all fines and penaltiesAdjust revenue distribution to 60% local, 40% stateState should pay salaries of district court judges
-
Recommendations from the Past (contd)1999 Commission on Justice, Efficiency, and Accountability
the Board for Judicial Administration should develop a funding strategy for the judicial branch and evaluate state funding for mandated judicial services
-
Recommendations from the Past(contd)1999 Court Improvement Act
initiated by BJAat local option - state to pay costs of trial judges salaries, expert witness fees, jury, interpreter and indigent defense costsstate to pay for costs of capital cases
-
Recommendations from the Past (contd)1999 Court Improvement Act
state to pay for civil legal servicesestablished court improvement account for counties that opted inincreased filing fees, PSEA assessment, and infraction penalties redistributed revenue between local and state govts.
-
Recommendation from the Past (contd)2001 Project 2001a long term solution for adequate funding of the judicial system as an independent branch of government is critical to the success of court reform efforts. Finding the proper balance of shared financial responsibility between local and state government is imperative
-
Other StatesCALIFORNIAImpetus: Unequal justiceCounty fiscal crisisAuthority:Constitutional amendmentLocal optionBudget:base plusmonthly drawmaximum state control
-
Other StatesOREGONImpetus: County fiscal crisisAuthority:StatutoryBudget:base -formula drivenplus new programslump sum maximum local control
-
Other States
FLORIDAImpetus:Routine Constitutional ReviewAuthority:Constitutional amendmentBudget:hold harmlessperformance and accountability standards
-
Other StatesPENNSYLVANIAImpetus:Lawsuit
Authority:Court order
Budget:Implementation in fluxphase 1- 175 employees
-
Other States RecommendationsContinue partial local responsibilityMaintain legislative involvementFacilities should remain local responsibilityDecide responsibility for collections activityDecide responsibility for personnel(union contracts, retirement systems)State-wide automation is critical
-
Other States Recommendations (contd)Clarify how court revenue will be distributedFunctional approach to state funding works bestLitigation is a treacherous solution to the court funding problem
-
Washington State 01-03 Budget(Dollars in Thousands)LegislativeJudicialGovt OperationsHuman ServicesNatural ResourcesTransportationPublic SchoolsHigher EducationOther EducationSpecial Appropriations$136,110$140,864$2,649,413$18,976,685$1,102,464$105,690$11,503,685$6,439,607$110,984$1,904,368
-
Chart1
136110
140864
2649413
18976685
1102464
105690
11503685
6439607
110984
1904368
Washington State 01-03 Budget
Sheet1
Washington State
Legislative136,110.0
Judicial140,864.0
Govt Operations2,649,413.0
Human Services18,976,685.0
Natural Resources1,102,464.0
Transportation105,690.0
Public Schools11,503,685.0
Higher Education6,439,607.0
Other Education110,984.0
Special Approps1,904,368.0
Statewide Total43,069,870.0
Judicial
Admin for the Courts85514
Court of Appeals25618
Office of Public Defense12944
Supreme Court10987
State Law Library3906
Judicial Conduct1895
Judicial140864
Sheet1
Washington State 01-03 Budget
Sheet2
Judicial Branch 01-03 Budget
Sheet3
-
Judicial Branch 01-03 Budget(Dollars in Thousands)AOC ($30 M = superior court judges salaries)Court of AppealsOffice of Public DefenseSupreme CourtState Law LibraryJudicial Conduct Comm.TOTAL (annual)
$85,514
$25,618$12,944$10,987$3,906$1,895
$70,432
-
Chart2
85514
25618
12944
10987
3906
1895
Judicial Branch 01-03 Budget
Sheet1
Washington State
Legislative136,110.0
Judicial140,864.0
Govt Operations2,649,413.0
Human Services18,976,685.0
Natural Resources1,102,464.0
Transportation105,690.0
Public Schools11,503,685.0
Higher Education6,439,607.0
Other Education110,984.0
Special Approps1,904,368.0
Statewide Total43,069,870.0
Judicial
Admin for the Courts85514
Court of Appeals25618
Office of Public Defense12944
Supreme Court10987
State Law Library3906
Judicial Conduct1895
Judicial140864
Sheet1
Washington State 01-03 Budget
Sheet2
Judicial Branch 01-03 Budget
Sheet3
-
Local Government Annual Expenditures
Superior Court$160.6 millionJuvenile Operations$105.6 millionDistrict Court$80.1 millionMunicipal Court$55.0 million
TOTAL$401.3 million
-
Chart2
70432
401300
State/Local Support of Courts
Sheet1
Washington State
Legislative136,110.0
Judicial140,864.0
Govt Operations2,649,413.0
Human Services18,976,685.0
Natural Resources1,102,464.0
Transportation105,690.0
Public Schools11,503,685.0
Higher Education6,439,607.0
Other Education110,984.0
Special Approps1,904,368.0
Statewide Total43,069,870.0
Judicial
Admin for the Courts85514
Court of Appeals25618
Office of Public Defense12944
Supreme Court10987
State Law Library3906
Judicial Conduct1895
Judicial140864
State70432
Local401300
Sheet1
Washington State 01-03 Budget
Sheet2
Judicial Branch 01-03 Budget
Sheet3
State/Local Support of Courts
-
Annual State RevenuePSEA
Superior Court$8.5 millionDistrict Court$33.3 millionMunicipal Court$24.0 million
TOTAL$65.8 million
-
Local Government Annual Revenue
Superior Court$20 millionDistrict Court (county)$39 millionDistrict Court (city)$10 millionMunicipal Court$41 million
TOTAL$111 million
-
Summary Annual State & Local Expenditures for Trial Courts$416 million($15 million state + $401 million local)Annual State & Local Revenues from Trial Courts$177 million($66 million state + $111 million local)