cost reduction strategies taskforce

Upload: rewrwe

Post on 03-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Cost Reduction Strategies Taskforce

    1/8

    Cost Reduction Strategies Taskforce

    Presenters:

    Lynn Kious, Johnson ControlsJeri Ballard, Shell Real Estate

  • 7/28/2019 Cost Reduction Strategies Taskforce

    2/8

    Cost Reduction Strategies

    MISSION At the Portfolio Level, develop strategies that integrate Real Estate, Operations,

    Projects, Sustainability and utilization to meet cost savings targets/objectives.

    SCOPE OF TASKFORCE Low hanging fruit is gone, we are now into 2-3 years of cost savings initiatives - What

    is next/now what? How can we learn from each other?

    GOALS Develop a base of case study examples of cost savings initiative that have been

    successful (implemented)

    Develop a list of recommended performance measurements and KPIs Whats new? Innovative Ideas?

    OBJECTIVES Case Studies / Best Practice Sharing Interviews Article Editorial / Whitepaper Presentations Virtual / Webinars or In-person

    2

  • 7/28/2019 Cost Reduction Strategies Taskforce

    3/8

    Cost Reduction Strategies

    COMMITTEE Lynn Kious, Johnson Controls Chair Jeri Ballard, Shell Co-Chair Andrew Hallissey, CB Richard Ellis Mark Schleyer, AT&T Grant Rockwell, Kaiser Permanente Chris Landers, Fischer Company

    MEETINGS 1st Tuesday of Month 10:30am (Pacific Time)

    DELIVERABLES Innovative idea sharing Real-world case studies with results

    3

    Rebecca Shirey, Herman Miller Sholem Prasow, Teknion Stephanie Leta, Jones Lange LaSalle Sandy Heistand, Advent Software Craig Hendrickson, CB Richard Ellis

    Discussion forums White papers

  • 7/28/2019 Cost Reduction Strategies Taskforce

    4/8

    Cost Reduction Strategy Leveraging LEED

    EBOM 2009High ROI and Short Paybacks Possible

    LEED for Existing Buildings:

    Operations and Maintenance 2009targeted at greening the worlds

    existing stock of buildings

    LEED EBOM demonstrated to: Reduce energy and water costs on

    an ROI basis for individual

    buildings Attract LEED-seeking tenants Increase rents

    Source: Sholem Prasow, Teknion

    Energy Conservation

    Measure

    Capital

    Cost

    Annual

    Energy and

    Water Cost

    Savings

    Light Fixtures 43,100 11,320

    Occupancy Sensors 14,200 14,365

    Day-Lighting sensors 11,500 3,893

    Low-Flow Fixtures 27,909 11,622

    Re-Commissioning 35,071 57,568

    Total 304,291 98,768

    Approximate EBOM

    Certification Costs

    25,000

    ROI examples: hard savings vs soft costs

  • 7/28/2019 Cost Reduction Strategies Taskforce

    5/8

    Cost Reduction Strategy Leveraging

    LEED EBOM 2009

    Further savings possible through synergies in a portfolioenvironment

    Object of this CoreNet study to identify the added benefits ofmanaging the entire portfolio synergistically

    Impact of USGBCs Portfolio Strategy (to be launched in2010)

    Volume LEED certification to streamline process and reducecosts

    Benefits of hard and soft district energy programs Streamlining policies and procedures across multiple facilities

    Results expected ready for presentation by CoreNet GlobalFall Summit

    5

  • 7/28/2019 Cost Reduction Strategies Taskforce

    6/8

    Portfolio Knowledge is the Key to

    Cost Reduction

    Bearing:

    1) Strategic

    2) Non-Strategic Short Term

    3) Surplus

    Operational Requirements:

    1) Preferred Term

    2) Flexibility Needed

    3) Risk Tolerance

    Financial Impacts:1) Balance Sheet Considerations

    2) Tax Treatment

    3) Use of Proceeds (Debt Reduction/Reinvestment/StockRepurchase)

    6

  • 7/28/2019 Cost Reduction Strategies Taskforce

    7/8

    Pursue Multiple Cost Drivers

    But Understand Which Ones Really Matter

    Total Cost of Occupancy

    Location:

    Drives the overall cost per sqft

    Country, city, and sub-market

    Urban versus suburban

    Quality of building (class A, B, or C)

    Space:

    Total number of people accommodated

    Size of offices, workstations, amenitiesand special use spaces (sqft perperson)

    Dynamic sharing ratios, unassignedworkspace and home working policies

    Ability to efficiently space plan the floors

    Amount of vacant space in the portfolio

    Services:

    Consistent global standards and servicelevels

    Leverage goods and servicespurchased

    Capex versus opex tradeoffs

    Higher density and utilization =increased wear and tear

    Holding:

    Lease versus Own

    Legal Entity

    Tax Treatments

    Exit strategy drives holding strategy

    7

  • 7/28/2019 Cost Reduction Strategies Taskforce

    8/8

    Speed of delivery

    $Impact

    High

    Low

    1 year 5 year

    Location change- countryImproved dynamic

    sharing

    Location change -city

    FM Service levels

    Location change- City vs Urban

    Demand management

    Outsourcing

    RebidContracts

    Biggest Opportunities are not Short-term